Alcator C-Mod Run 1000907 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:271
Date Filed: 5/12/2000
Title:Scaling of H-mode pedestal parameters with global plasma parameters
First Author:Dmitri Mossessian
Session Leader:Dmitri Mossessian (shots 1-19)

Operators
Session leader(s):Dmitri Mossessian
Physics operator(s):Ron Parker
Engineering operator(s):Bill Cochran,Bill Parkin

Engineering Operator Run Comment
MP271,part2-pedestal parameters scalings with magnetic field and plasma

Session Leader Plans

Physics Operators Plans

Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:24:773PM
Author: To Be Determined
Run summary for 1000907 - MP 271 Pedestal scalings

The plan was to start with 1000906018, 5.4 T, 0.8 MA. RF 2.5 - 2 MW, obtain steady state EDA and then
scan BT shot to shot from 4.5 to 5.5 T.(higher field was done on 1000906). Then we were going to
scan target density shot to shot from 4e19 to 1.4e19, keeping const RF at 2.5 - 2 MW (Ip=0.8MA, Bt=5.4T)
The idea was to see if pedestal parameters, gradPe in particular, scale with density at constant plasma current.
To get a wide density range we also were going to to control plasma density during H-mode with additional gas puff.

Only a small part of the plan was carried out - the Bt scan. Initial conclusion is that none of the pedestal parameters
depend on Bt.
An attempt to do the density scan was stopped by series of unexplainable disruptions, fizzles and duds.
There are 6 usefull shots out of 19, see details below.

ECDC between shots did help to keep H/D relatively low. Still, on average H/D was about 10-8%, as opposed to the optimum of 3%

Details:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000907001 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Sep 7 2000 9:29:57:950AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Starting field scan. Repeat shot 18 from 09/06:

Nice plasma: Ip=0.8 MA, Bt=5.2 T, nl=0.8e20, RF 2.5/2 MW, EDA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000907002 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Sep 7 2000 9:56:07:436AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lower field for this shot to 4.8 T. Other - same.

PLasma: 3 ELM-free-looking H-modes. RF 2.5/2 MW with 2 trips
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000907003 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Sep 7 2000 10:19:36:013AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plasma: Same field (4.8 T), lower RF 2/1.5 MW. Multiple ELM-free.

H/D is about 10% - strart ECDC between shots after this shot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000907004 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Sep 7 2000 10:26:59:996AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plasma: 4.8 T, after ECDC H/D is at 6% at the beginning of the shot, rising
to 10% with RF. First H-mode is EDA, then 2 ELM-free

For next shot: go to 4.5 T, other - same. ECDC between shots
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000907005 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Sep 7 2000 10:44:33:390AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.5 T, multiple ELM-free

Go back to 5.4 T, start nl scan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000907008 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Sep 7 2000 12:44:48:700PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ELM-free looking (but with QC at 120kHz) at 2.5/2 MW

Keep density low, go to 1.5/1 MW
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000907009 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Sep 7 2000 12:45:11:140PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ELM-free looking (but with QC at 120kHz) at 1.5/1 MW

Try going to lower density
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000907016 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Sep 7 2000 3:58:04:326PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Series of disruptions, fizzles and duds after shot 9.

Finally, plasma on shot 16, EDA with 2.5/2 MW at 0.9e20 m^-2

Go to higher tagret 1.1e20 for next shot
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000907019 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Sep 7 2000 4:54:08:966PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
All disruptions after shot 16.

Physics Operator Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:37:11:940PM
Author: To Be Determined
PHYSOP SUMMARY FOR 1000907

ENGINEERING SETUP AND RUN PLAN

MP271 Pedestal Parameters Scalings with Magnetic Field and Plasma Density

Session Leader: D. Mossessian
Physics Operator: R. Parker
Engineering Operators: B. Cochran/W. Parkin

Engineering Setup:

Overnight ECDC in D2, stopping 1-2 hours before run.

Run begins at 9:00 and ends at 17:00.

Power system setup: Same as for 1000906018 (5.4 T, 0.8 MA diverted)

Set OH1, OH2U and OH2L fizzle delays at 300ms
Set TF fizzle delay at 400 ms


Gas setup: B-Top 6 psi D2 Hybrid Enabled
B-side lower 1 psi Argon Hybrid Enabled
B-side upper leave as is Hybrid DISABLED
C-side 30 psi D2 Hybrid Enabled
J-bottom leave as is Hybrid DISABLED

The following Gate Valves should be ENABLED, assuming no vacuum problems:

ECE, VUV

DNB Valve DISABLED

RUN PLAN:

Start with shot 1000906018, a 5.4 T, 0.8 MA, diverted discharge with
RF heating starting at 2.5 MW, then stepping down to 2.0 MW after 400 ms.

Then, scan field between 4.5 and 5.5 Tesla.

Return to 1000906018 and scan target density from 0.4 to 1.4e20 cm-3, with
RF as above.

We'll attempt to control plasma density during H-Mode with gas puff.

RUN SUMMARY

The run began well, with the first 5 shots going off as programmed. However, the
plan to run ECDC between shots was thwarted by a faulty shutter on a bolometer.
This was fixed after shot 3, and ECDC remained in use between shots for the rest
of the run. As in previous runs, it was successfully used to reduce the H/D
ratio.

Bob Granetz replaced R. Parker for shots 6-11. Shots 6,7,10 and 11 disrupted,
while shots 8 and 9 produced useful data. High disruptivity plagued the
rest of the run, with only shot 16 avoiding a major disruption.

The disruptions were evidently caused by a Moly injection, but the cause of
the injection was not clear.

Overall, a difficult day with a disappointing number of useful shots. A minor
delay was caused by the faulty shutter, but a more significant delay was
caused by an OH2 U power supply problem. This occured on shot 13, resulting
in the only fizzle of the day, and led to a delay of over 1 hour during which
time 3 fuses were replaced.

Scorecard: 19 shots, 1 power supply test, 1 fizzle, 1 dud and 8 major disruptions

Session Leader Comments
Sep 7 2000 09:15:23:107AMDmitri MossessianMP 271 - Pedestal scalings.
We'll try to do filed and density scans today
Sep 7 2000 09:29:57:950AM1000907001Dmitri MossessianStarting field scan. Repeat shot 18 from 09/06:

Nice plasma: Ip=0.8 MA, Bt=5.2 T, nl=0.8e20, RF 2.5/2 MW, EDA
Sep 7 2000 09:56:07:437AM1000907002Dmitri MossessianLower field for this shot to 4.8 T. Other - same.

3 ELM-free-looking H-modes. RF 2.5/2 MW with 2 trips
Sep 7 2000 10:19:36:013AM1000907003Dmitri MossessianSame field (4.8 T), lower RF 2/1.5 MW. Multiple ELM-free.
H/D is about 10% - strart ECDC between shots after this shot.
Sep 7 2000 10:26:59:997AM1000907004Dmitri Mossessian4.8 T, after ECDC H/D is at 6% at the beginning of the shot, rising
to 10% with RF. First H-mode is EDA, then 2 ELM-free

For next shot: go to 4.5 T, other - same. ECDC between shots
Sep 7 2000 10:44:33:390AM1000907005Dmitri Mossessian4.5 T, multiple ELM-free

Go back to 5.4 T, start nl scan
Sep 7 2000 11:06:11:780AM1000907006Dmitri MossessianEDA at 2.5 MW disrupted at .9 sec.

Go to 5e19 m^-2 for next shot
Sep 7 2000 12:44:48:700PM1000907008Dmitri MossessianELM-free looking (but with QC at 120kHz) at 2.5/2 MW

Keep density low, go to 1.5/1 MW
Sep 7 2000 12:45:11:140PM1000907009Dmitri MossessianELM-free looking (but with QC at 120kHz) at 1.5/1 MW

Try going to lower density
Sep 7 2000 12:45:45:920PM1000907010Dmitri MossessianDensity a little lower. Disruptet after 1st ELM-free

Go to 9e19 target, 2.5/2 MW
Sep 7 2000 03:58:04:327PM1000907016Dmitri MossessianSeries of disruptions, fizzles and duds after shot 9.

Finally, plasma on shot 16, EDA with 2.5/2 MW

Go to higher tagret 1.1e20 for next shot
Sep 7 2000 04:54:08:967PM1000907019Dmitri MossessianAll disruptions after shot 16.

Physics Operator Comments
Sep 7 2000 09:32:51:640AM1000907001Ron Parker
First shot today ran as programmed, with a slight field ramp from 5.4 to 5.2 T.

There is no ECDC between shots, as the Z bolo shutter is not working. It should be fixed

for shot 3 or 4.
Sep 7 2000 09:43:44:390AM1000907002Ron Parker
In shot 2, the field was ramped down to 4.8 T (133500 kA). No other changes from
shot 1 were made. The shot ran again as programmed. No changes for the next shot.
ECDC still not operating and H/D ratio is high, ~10%.
Sep 7 2000 10:12:25:950AM1000907003Ron Parker
Shot 3 ran as programmed, with periodic H modes.
Cell entry after shot to fix bolo shutter.

Bolo shutter is fixed and ECDC has been turned on for 10 minutes
prior to next shot which will be delayed about 5 minutes.
Sep 7 2000 10:28:11:170AM1000907004Ron Parker
Shot 4 ran well. ECDC now running between shots.
Next shot: Field lowered to 4.5 T (125 kA)
Sep 7 2000 10:44:07:437AM1000907005Ron ParkerShot 5 ran well, but periodic injections are limiting H-mode durations.
For next shot, the field will be set at 5.4 T (150 kA).
H/D still ~ 8%. ECDC between shots continues.
Sep 7 2000 11:00:55:670AM1000907006Robert GranetzI'm substituting for Ron as physics operator for the next 1.5 hours.
Sep 7 2000 11:10:24:983AM1000907006Robert GranetzShot 06 -- Plasma. Disrupted at t=0.90 s. Looks like it was killed by a brick
injected at 0.88 s. One EDA H-mode. Btor=5.3 T. Ip=0.8 MA.

Next shot: reduce density to nl_04=0.5e20 m-2 (from 0.7e20).
Brian will begin firing the FSP on the next shot, but far out in the SOL.

ECDC in D2 is being done between shots.
Sep 7 2000 11:36:07:043AM1000907007Robert GranetzShot 07 -- Plasma. Disrupted at t=0.73 s. Prad is very high, and starts
its rise as soon as the RF turns on. NL_04=0.6e20 m-2 before
the H-mode starts.

Next shot: no changes.

ECDC in D2 is being done between shots.
Sep 7 2000 12:00:18:997PM1000907008Robert GranetzShot 08 -- Plasma. Good shot. Multiple H-modes. Prf(D+E)=2.6 MW, then 2.0 MW.
Target nl_04=0.6-0.7e20 m-2.

Next shot: no PCS changes. Raise Prf to 3.0 MW, then 2.0 MW.

ECDC in D2 is being done between shots.
Sep 7 2000 12:24:51:297PM1000907009Robert GranetzShot 09 -- Plasma. Good shot. Target nl_04=0.55-0.7e20 m-2.
H/D=5-8%. Multiple H-modes.

Next shot: reduce target density further by lowering the
pre-programmed valve voltage

ECDC in D2 is being done between shots.
Sep 7 2000 12:46:47:200PM1000907010Robert GranetzShot 10 -- Plasma. Disrupted at t=0.79 s. There was a lot of radiated power
on this shot, similar to the previous disruption on shot 07.
Target nl_04 decreased a little to 0.35-0.64e20 m-2.

Next shot: increase density to nl_04=0.9e20 m-2.

ECDC in D2 is being done between shots.
Sep 7 2000 01:07:14:700PM1000907011Robert GranetzShot 11 -- Plasma. Disrupted at t=0.62 s. Looks like a brick. Target density
increased to nl_04=0.9e20 m-2, as desired. The injection occurred
before the FSP fired.

Ron Parker is back as physics operator now.

ECDC in D2 is being done between shots.
Sep 7 2000 01:37:23:530PM1000907012Ron Parker
Shot disrupted again, even though RG has left the PO chair.

Why? RF? Ar? Probe? Strike point? None of the above?

We'll find out if it is any of the first three on shot 13 by 1) moving RF turnon 200 msec
later; 2) reducing Ar pulse to 10 ms (it was only 20 ms); 3) keeping the probe stationary.
If none of these, we'll move the plasma around.
Sep 7 2000 02:26:33:187PM1000907013Ron ParkerShot 13 was a fizzle, caused by OH2 power supply problems.

On inspection 6 blown fuses were found. Repair requires a delay of
approximately 1 hour.
Sep 7 2000 03:26:06:937PM1000907014Ron ParkerShot 14 was an OH2 upper test. It turned out that only 3 fuses were blown.

After the repair to the fuses, there was an additional delay due to a hung
computer. Shot 13 will be a repeat of 13, hopefully without the fizzle.
Sep 7 2000 03:40:38:810PM1000907015Ron Parker
Shot was a dud, pressure a bit low, .055 mT, and BZ drifting upwards, -.0015 @ t=0.
Pressure will be higher on next shot due ot ECDC and EF4 current decreased by 20 A.
Sep 7 2000 04:01:48:437PM1000907016Ron Parker
Shot 16 ran well, no disruption (why?).

Next shot: target density increased to 1.1e20.
Sep 7 2000 04:19:32:437PM1000907017Ron Parker
Shot 17 disrupted at 0.9 s due to an unidentified injection.

Try again on next shot.
Sep 7 2000 04:46:18:747PM1000907018Ron ParkerShot 18 again disrupted. Try again, no changes.
Sep 7 2000 04:54:05:640PM1000907019Ron ParkerSame shot, same disruption. No conclusion on cause.

Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
109:13:23:997AMPlasmaOk
209:33:04:530AMPlasmaOk
309:51:02:420AMPlasmaOk
410:17:45:483AMPlasmaOk
510:36:04:623AMPlasmaOk
610:59:18:967AMPlasmaOk
711:20:23:530AMPlasmaOk
811:48:38:730AMPlasmaOk
912:11:06:513PMPlasmaOk
1012:34:05:437PMPlasmaOk
1112:55:51:030PMPlasmaOk
1201:19:11:747PMPlasmaOk
1301:41:24:310PMPlasmaOk
1403:04:53:780PMTestOkoh2U test PLC control
1503:25:41:700PMPlasmaOk
1603:47:46:700PMPlasmaOk
1704:08:38:717PMPlasmaOk
1804:29:16:890PMPlasmaOk
1904:49:27:403PMPlasmaOk