| Miniproposals | ||||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Steve Wukitch,Yijun Lin |
| Physics operator(s): | Jim Irby |
| Engineering operator(s): | Gary Dekow,Bill Parkin,Ed Fitzgerald |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| MP#326 High Power RF; SL: Wukitch/Lin; PO: Irby; EO:Dekow/Fitz/Parkin |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:32:913PM |
| Author: Steve Wukitch |
| *********************************************************************************** 05-June-2003 *********************************************************************************** Engineering setup for Thursday 1030605 MP#326 High Power RF SL: Wukitch/Lin PO: Irby ECDC overnight in D2 at 2e-4 Torr, stopping by 07:00. Bake at 60 C overnight. Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 17:00. All ICRF transmitters will be needed for this run. Power systems the same as on 1030529025 Non-axisymmetric control coil configuration: +Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot Gas setup: fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar Hybrid enabled (PG1) fill B-side upper with 10 psi D2 Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) (for ECDC) fill C-side with 30 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3) Enable the following gatevalves: ECE, DNB, VUV 002 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~1 LSN D: 0.75 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 0.75 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran clean E: ran clean J: ran multiple faults early, fewer late PRF = 2.6 MW 003 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 3 faults early E: ran 4 faults early J: ran max faults PRF = 4.4 MW for brief period 004 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.25 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.25 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran max faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults - better than last shot PRF = 5 MW for brief period 005 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 2.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran max faults - runaway power E: ran 5 faults J: ran max faults PRF = 5 MW for brief periods 006 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 2.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: NTP (no EF3) 007 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 2.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 4 faults - runaway power E: ran 3 faults J: ran max faults but better PRF = 5 MW for brief periods 008 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 0 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 3 faults - runaway power E: 0 J: ran max faults - retries struggle a bit PRF = 4.5 MW for brief periods 009 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 0 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 3.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 3 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults PRF = 5.6 MW for brief periods new record injected power from J for short pulses 010 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 3.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 2 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults - better PRF = 5.6 MW for brief periods 011 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 3.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 1 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults - better PRF = 5.6 MW for brief periods 012 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 3.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 4 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults - better PRF = 6 MW for 40 msec J4 had a screen overload and J3 ran by itself at 1.6 MW without injections 013 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 4 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults - better PRF = 6 MW for 40 msec 014 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 4 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults - better PRF = 6 MW for 60 msec 015 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 4 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults - better PRF = 6 MW for 80 msec 016 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 4 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults PRF=5.4 MW for ~0.3 sec 017 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 3 faults - runaway power E: ran clean J: ran max faults PRF = 5.4 MW for 80 msec 018 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 3 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults PRF = 5.4 MW for 80 msec 019 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma - early disruption 020 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 3 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults PRF = 4.8 MW for 80 msec 021 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 0.6 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.2 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran max faults E: ran 4 fault J: ran max faults - all from J3DC1 PRF = 4.6 MW for 80 msec 022 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 0.6 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.2 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran max faults E: ran clean J: ran max faults - but got better later in discharge PRF = 4.6 MW for 80 msec 023 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec, open-loop. no power feedback. E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran. Seems that the demand and the result still off. Max faults. E: ran. one faults. J: ran.Max faults. PRF = 4 MW D port open loop operation seems to also by-pass the slow-rise start-up. As a result, the retries are less successful than running with the feedback. 024 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: .7 MW [.7-1.3] sec, open-loop. no power feedback. E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.8 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran. Start with power overshoot then come down. No slow start-up. I will ramp up for next shot. E: ran. one faults. J: ran.Max faults. 025 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: off E: 1.2 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.8 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: off E: ran. clean J: ran. 6 faults. D off to check the problem in the power. Demand seemed to be too high. Found it was the bad coefficients I put in the tree for the calibration of demand and power. (Don't why they are not working). 026 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: off E: 1.2 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.8 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: off E: ran. one faults. J: ran.Max faults. D off to check the problem in the power. Demand seemed to be too high. Found it was the bad coefficients I put in the tree for the calibration of demand and power from dummy load test. (Don't why they are not working). Reload old coefficients. Now it should work, but the max programable power is about 0.8 MW in the RF-control widget. It gives you 1.5 MW. (The response is nonlinear!) 027 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: demand 0.5 MW, should get 1 MW. [0.7, 1.3] Sec. open-loop E: 1.2 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.8 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran. about 1 MW. 100 ms gaps from 0.96 to 1.05 sec with difficultied in retries E: ran. clean. 1.3 MW. J: ran. Max faults. about 2 MW. PRF = 4.4 MW, one long EDA H-mode 028 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: demand 0.53 MW, should get 1.2 MW. [0.7, 1.3] Sec. open-loop. E: 1.3 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.7 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran. about 1-1.2 MW. Some retry problems later. E: ran. clean. 1.5 MW. J: ran. one fault later. about 1.9 MW. PRF = 4.6 MW. Best shot so far. 4.6 MW, continueous for 520 ms. One long EDA H-mode 029 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: demand 0.55 MW, should get 1.3 MW. [0.7, 1.3] Sec. open-loop. E: 1.4 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.8 MW[.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran. about 1.2-1.3 MW. Some retry problems later. E: ran. clean. 1.6 MW. J: ran. one fault later. about 2 MW. PRF = 5.0 MW. 4.9 MW, continueous for 370 ms. One long EDA H-mode. 030 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: demand 0.565 MW, should get 1.4 MW. [0.7, 1.3] Sec. open-loop. E: 1.45 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.75 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran. about 1.2-1.4 MW. clean E: ran. clean. 1.7 MW. clean J: ran. one trip. about 2 MW. PRF = 5.0 MW. 5.0 MW, with only one trip from J at 1.03 sec. One long EDA H-mode. Next shot: try 1 MA shot. 031 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: demand 0.57 MW, should get 1.45 MW. [0.7, 1.3] Sec. open-loop. E: 1.45 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.76 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran. one gap from 0.8 to 0.82 sec. Retry problem. E: ran. clean. 1.7 MW. clean J: ran. 2 trips. about 2 MW. PRF = 4.8 MW. 250 dummy load test D-port with open loop feedback; demand 0.1 MW; result .001 251 252 better 253 DL test for D-port with modulator swapped from E-port 254 DL test for E-port with modulator swapped from D-port Summary: Steady (~0.5 sec) 5 MW EDA H-modes were achieved (1030605029 and 030) for the first time. Higher power shorter (<0.1 sec) H-modes were also achieved. The overall plasma performance was moderate. H-factors ~1.5 were typical and the maximum stored energy for the day was ~195 kJ. There have been 3 MW discharges in the past that had > 200 kJ. High performance at high current and density will take some shot development. RF pulse length and total power level were paced by D and J-port antennas. An on-going problem with D-port power feedback limited its power level to ~1 MW. The temporary solution was to run the feedback open loop. For J-port, 2 MW, 0.5 sec pulses have become more reliable, but high powers still had multiple faults. At 2.7 MW (1030605016), the pulse length is currently ~0.3 sec and for 3.2 MW the pulse length is ~0.08 sec. The conditioning progress is better than after the first boronization and the system appears to be improving. Additional operation may result in even higher power, 0.5 sec pulses. Record J-port power level was achieved for short (0.08 sec) pulses for the first time as well. In shot 012, J3 was run at 1.6 MW without injection without J4 powered. In the past this type of operation has led to injections. Additional RF Notes: At high power on D, the voltage and Vmax derived from DC2 diverge and the power is likely to run uncontrolled. Swapped modulator boards in D and E. D-port still ran uncontrolled but E-port was fine. To have some reliable control of the power, FMIT#1 was run open loop and it behaved better. For steady targets, the output power will be fairly steady but varying loads will result in varying output power. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:37:18:130PM |
| Author: Jim Irby |
| Run 1030605 High RF Power SL: Lin, Wukitch EO: Dekow, Fitzgerald, Parkin PO: Irby, Rowan The machine ran extremely well today with no duds or fizzles and 29 plasmas. Two disruptions, shots 18 and 19, were caused by the mysterious injections from the divertor. Shot 18 ran nearly 1.3 s before disrupting, while 19 only ran only 0.6 s. So we waited 20 minutes before taking shot 20, and also did 5 minutes of ECDC. Either the ECDC, or the wait, or random events helped as we did not have another disruption. A major result of the run was obtaining reliable operation at 5 MW using all three antennas. On shot 22, going against the advice of the PO, the SL decreased the current from 1 MA to 0.8 MA. This change allowed us to get a sustained EDA mode. By shot 28 the rf had been tuned up to get pretty clean 4.5 MW rf pulses. By shot 30 nearly 5 MW of power was coupled with only one interrupt on j-port. On shot 15 we had 195 kJ of stored energy with an rf power level of 5 MW. Though this was a fairly high stored energy for recent operation, we have obtained over 200 kJ at 3 MW of rf in the past. So a careful study of stored energy with rf power should be a high priority now that the rf is working well. The non-axisymmetric control coils were used from shot 7 onward. Problems -------- EF3 failed to go on shot 6. Still having problems with d-port rf power control. The feedback link was cut part way though the run, and the power level was controlled directly. It took several visits to the power room to get the a-coils running. Score ----- duds: 0 fizzles: 0 plasmas: 29 Shot Log -------- test 01 ef3 fault 06 plasma 02,03,04,05,07,08,09,10,11.12,13, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24, 25,26,27,28,29,30,31 disruptions: 18,19 --- injections from lower divertor Details ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605xxx irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 8:53:59:800AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . loaded shot 1030529025 from the last high power rf run will start out with non-axisymmetric coils in operation Yijun just told me that he and Charley just found an unterminated splitter from DC0 on d-port that might explain the control problem. may try x-point sweep if we continue to have problems with injections from the divertor ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605001 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 8:38:11:560AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Start with cycle test --- check data system and gas gs looks a little high ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605002 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 9:23:31:883AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pre-fill from 27 to 25 ms reduced argon from 37 to 25 ms until John complains Gary reports a problem with the a-coil breaker --- we may or may not have them for this shot Plasma --- first h-mode actually lasted a while --- 134 kJ, only 100 kJ to go h/(h+d) at 6% at 1.2 s vs 9% during the 5/29 run (shot 25) startup looks very good No a-coil --- contactor not closed Time (ms): 0 5 10 25 ---------------------------------------- % Compiled module: DERIV. Ip (kA): -4.5115 -18.2121 -32.2062 -118.2515 dIp/dt (kA/ms): -1.4241 -2.7796 -3.2100 -7.0591 pressure (mTorr): 0.0647 0.0662 0.0677 0.0669 Bz0 (mT): -3.5554 -1.1766 1.8778 22.2482 Br0 (mT): -1.4500 -1.6009 -1.7910 -1.7759 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605003 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 9:40:35:046AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Density request from 1e20 to 8e19 /m^2 --- a little better for rf? plasma into rampdown --- h-modes not as good --- earl suggests higher not lower density startup still looks good, though pressure was up 5 or 10% h/(h+d) up a little ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605004 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 9:58:18:430AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . plasma into rampdown rf power 3 av going up to 5 --- good early h-mode --- 162 kJ briefly h-mode starting earlier with more rf power early h/(h+d) at 7% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605005 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 10:17:48:303AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . prefill from 25 to 23 ms plasma --- but almost lost it --- gas too low? series short lasting h-modes --- irritation d-port is still not under control --- got nearly 2 MW when programmed for 1 h/(h+d) no change ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605006 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 10:39:15:353AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . prepuff increased by 1 ms to 24 ms. no plasma and no EF3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605007 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 10:46:48:480AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plasma into rampdown --- startup much better still lots of h-modes a-coil back in operation --- turn on at 0.5 s rf power between 3 an 5 MW stored energy about 150 kJ h/d creeping up ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605008 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 11:02:16:423AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No PCS changes plasma into rampdown --- startup still looks good no e-port rf --- multiple ratty h-modes h/(h+d) at 7% at 1.2 s ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605009 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 11:17:22:003AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No PCS changes startup up not as good --- will drop prefill slightly for next shot plasma into rampdown --- a little more rf power, but troubles with j-port 164 kJ, 41e12 neuts/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605010 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 11:33:50:353AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepuff reduced by 1ms startup good --- little longer h-modes cycle jumped directly to recool --- Tom restarted dispatcher --- data showing up ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605011 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 11:46:43:790AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No PCS changes Startup worse again 6 MW peak rf power, but j-port still tripping h-modes look a little better ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605012 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 12:03:15:626PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Added back the 1 ms prepuff --- now 24 ms again startup very good --- pressure a little higher as requested plasma into rampdown ---- three h-modes 182 kJ briefly h/(h+d) nearly 8% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605013 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 12:27:16:900PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No PCS changes plasma into rampdown, good startup 187 kJ, a little less j-port power but ran longer w/o fault --- 5.5 MW total 64e12 neuts --> 191 kJ from Earl's scaling law ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605013 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 12:43:09:910PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No PCS changes plasma into rampdown, good startup 183 kJ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605014 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 12:44:17:020PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No PCS changes plasma into rampdown --- j-port on a little more ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605015 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 12:53:52:503PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No PCS changes Plasma into rampdown --- good startup Catherine mentions we were already in neutron alert territory last shot 195 kJ briefly h/(h+d) 8.2% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605016 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 1:07:12:400PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No PCS changes Plasma into rampdown --- j-port looking better h/(h+d) to 9% 189 kJ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605017 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 1:25:51:943PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No PCS changes --- shot 16 startup not great, but gas, fields, etc looked fine, so leave alone Plasma into rampdown --- 1st h-mode lasted 420 ms, 5.2 MW note that 2Pi foil radiation 50% of shot 14 level h/(h+d) 7.5% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605018 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 1:39:26:916PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No PCS changes Disruption at 1.28 s, injection ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605019 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 2:10:59:636PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reduced prefill by 1 ms Disruption even earlier --- big injection note that more gas is required to maintain density request following the disruption on shot 18 hards early ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605020 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 2:22:30:763PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 minutes of ecdc --- plus an 18 minute wait no change in gas puff plasma into rampdown, but bad startup --- br0 too positive? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605021 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 2:45:18:610PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Br0 from 0.000 to -.00025 T --- let's pretend to make a change prefill increased by 1 ms Argon disabled for this shot --- too high signal on PPPL spectrometer? 20 minute wait before INIT plasma into rampdown --- startup is better ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605022 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 3:04:00:170PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ip from 1e6 to 0.8e6 Amps plasma into rampdown --- looks like EDA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605023 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 3:13:36:106PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 023. Rowan sitting in for Irby Plasma through ramp down. Next shot: no pcs changes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605024 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 3:27:30:096PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 024. Plasma. 16 minutes since last shot Next shot. No pcs changes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605025 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 3:54:57:516PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 025. Plasma through rampdown 19 minutes since last shot Next shot: no pcs changes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605026 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 4:08:41:380PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 026. Plasma. Again through ramp down. Next shot: No PCS changes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605027 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 4:36:37:390PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 027. Plasma. Lasted through rampdown. Rowan's last shot. Irby resumes control. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605028 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 4:56:34:220PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thank you Bill... No PCS changes plasma into rampdown ---- h-factor 1.8 peak (rf_eff = 80%) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605029 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 4:57:04:580PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plasma into rampdown ---- 5 MW ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605030 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 5:03:45:590PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No PCS changes plasma into rampdown --- nice eda, only one j-port trip! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030605031 irby PHYSICS_OPERATOR Jun 5 2003 5:24:45:246PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . For the last shot: increase Ip to 1 MA increase Density to 1.e20 nl04 Plasma to rampdown --- couple of trips on j-port, a few on d-port -- 3 h-modes Great day! |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Jun 5 2003 09:37:00:180AM | 1030605002 | Steve Wukitch | 002 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~1 LSN D: 0.75 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 0.75 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran clean E: ran clean J: ran multiple faults early, fewer late PRF = 2.6 MW |
| Jun 5 2003 09:40:06:310AM | 1030605003 | Steve Wukitch | 003 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 3 faults early E: ran 4 faults early J: ran max faults PRF = 4.4 MW for brief period |
| Jun 5 2003 10:22:19:563AM | 1030605004 | Steve Wukitch | 004 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.25 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.25 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran max faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults - better than last shot PRF = 5 MW for brief period |
| Jun 5 2003 10:21:59:500AM | 1030605005 | Steve Wukitch | 005 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 2.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran max faults - runaway power E: ran 5 faults J: ran max faults PRF = 5 MW for brief periods |
| Jun 5 2003 10:21:49:593AM | 1030605006 | Steve Wukitch | 006 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 2.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: NTP (no EF3) |
| Jun 5 2003 11:11:01:130AM | 1030605007 | Steve Wukitch | 007 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 2.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 4 faults - runaway power E: ran 3 faults J: ran max faults but better PRF = 5 MW for brief periods |
| Jun 5 2003 11:11:27:380AM | 1030605008 | Steve Wukitch | 008 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 0 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 3 faults - runaway power E: 0 J: ran max faults - retries struggle a bit PRF = 4.5 MW for brief periods |
| Jun 5 2003 11:11:42:820AM | 1030605009 | Steve Wukitch | 009 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 0 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 3.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 3 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults PRF = 5.6 MW for brief periods new record injected power from J for short pulses |
| Jun 5 2003 11:47:14:387AM | 1030605010 | Steve Wukitch | 010 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 3.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 2 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults - better PRF = 5.6 MW for brief periods |
| Jun 5 2003 11:46:57:697AM | 1030605011 | Steve Wukitch | 011 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 3.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 1 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults - better PRF = 5.6 MW for brief periods |
| Jun 5 2003 12:03:30:360PM | 1030605012 | Steve Wukitch | 012 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.6-1.3] sec J: 3.0 MW [.6-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 4 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults - better PRF = 6 MW for 40 msec |
| Jun 5 2003 12:37:35:320PM | 1030605013 | Steve Wukitch | 013 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 4 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults - better |
| Jun 5 2003 02:03:44:593PM | 1030605014 | Steve Wukitch | 014 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 4 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults - better PRF = 6 MW for 60 msec |
| Jun 5 2003 02:03:56:423PM | 1030605015 | Steve Wukitch | 015 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 4 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults - better PRF = 6 MW for 80 msec |
| Jun 5 2003 02:04:22:440PM | 1030605016 | Steve Wukitch | 016 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 4 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults PRF=5.4 MW for ~0.3 sec |
| Jun 5 2003 02:04:36:957PM | 1030605017 | Steve Wukitch | 017 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 3 faults - runaway power E: ran clean J: ran max faults PRF = 5.4 MW for 80 msec |
| Jun 5 2003 02:49:31:290PM | 1030605018 | Steve Wukitch | 018 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 3 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults PRF = 5.4 MW for 80 msec |
| Jun 5 2003 01:59:20:040PM | 1030605019 | Steve Wukitch | 019 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma - early disruption |
| Jun 5 2003 02:50:45:650PM | 1030605020 | Steve Wukitch | 020 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran 3 faults - runaway power E: ran 1 fault J: ran max faults PRF = 4.8 MW for 80 msec |
| Jun 5 2003 02:51:13:370PM | 1030605021 | Steve Wukitch | 021 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 0.6 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.2 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran max faults E: ran 4 fault J: ran max faults - all from J3DC1 PRF = 4.6 MW for 80 msec |
| Jun 5 2003 02:51:21:450PM | 1030605022 | Steve Wukitch | 022 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 0.6 MW [.7-1.3] sec E: 1.2 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran max faults E: ran 4 faults J: ran max faults - all from J3DC1 PRF = 4.6 MW for 80 msec |
| Jun 5 2003 03:25:31:033PM | 1030605023 | Yijun Lin | 023 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: 1.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec, open-loop. no power feedback. E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 2.0 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran. Seems that the demand and the result still off. Max faults. E: ran. one faults. J: ran.Max faults. PRF = 4 MW023 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D port open loop operation seems to also by-pass the slow-rise start-up. As a result, the retries are less successful than running with the feedback. |
| Jun 5 2003 04:13:41:230PM | 1030605024 | Yijun Lin | 024 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: .7 MW [.7-1.3] sec, open-loop. no power feedback. E: 1.5 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.8 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran. Start with power overshoot then come down. No slow start-up. I will ramp up for next shot. E: ran. one faults. J: ran.Max faults. |
| Jun 5 2003 04:27:17:910PM | 1030605025 | Yijun Lin | 25 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: off E: 1.2 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.8 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: off E: ran. clean J: ran. 6 faults. D off to check the problem in the power. Demand seemed to be too high. Found it was the bad coefficients I put in the tree for the calibration of demand and power. (Don't why they are not working). |
| Jun 5 2003 04:27:31:410PM | 1030605026 | Yijun Lin | 26 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: off E: 1.2 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.8 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: off E: ran. one faults. J: ran.Max faults. D off to check the problem in the power. Demand seemed to be too high. Found it was the bad coefficients I put in the tree for the calibration of demand and power from dummy load test. (Don't why they are not working). Reload old coefficients. Now it should work, but the max programable power is about 0.8 MW in the RF-control widget. It gives you 1.5 MW. (The response is nonlinear!) |
| Jun 5 2003 04:31:10:210PM | 1030605027 | Yijun Lin | Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: demand 0.5 MW, should get 1 MW. [0.7, 1.3] Sec. open=loop. E: 1.2 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.8 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran. about 1 MW. 100 ms gaps from 0.96 to 1.05 sec with difficultied in retries E: ran. clean. 1.3 MW. J: ran. Max faults. about 2 MW. PRF = 4.4 MW, one long EDA H-mode |
| Jun 5 2003 04:37:28:847PM | 1030605028 | Yijun Lin | 28 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: demand 0.53 MW, should get 1.2 MW. [0.7, 1.3] Sec. open-loop. E: 1.3 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.7 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran. about 1-1.2 MW. Some retry problems later. E: ran. clean. 1.5 MW. J: ran. one fault later. about 1.9 MW. PRF = 4.6 MW. Best shot so far. 4.6 MW, continueous for 520 ms. One long EDA H-mode |
| Jun 5 2003 04:51:27:447PM | 1030605029 | Yijun Lin | 29 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: demand 0.55 MW, should get 1.3 MW. [0.7, 1.3] Sec. open-loop. E: 1.4 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.8 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran. about 1.2-1.3 MW. Some retry problems later. E: ran. clean. 1.6 MW. J: ran. one fault later. about 2 MW. PRF = 5.0 MW. 4.9 MW, continueous for 370 ms. One long EDA H-mode. |
| Jun 5 2003 05:01:56:977PM | 1030605030 | Yijun Lin | 030 Ip~0.8 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: demand 0.565 MW, should get 1.4 MW. [0.7, 1.3] Sec. open-loop. E: 1.45 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.75 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran. about 1.2-1.4 MW. clean E: ran. clean. 1.7 MW. clean J: ran. one trip. about 2 MW. PRF = 5.0 MW. 5.0 MW, with only one trip from J at 1.03 sec. One long EDA H-mode. Next shot: try 1 MA shot. |
| Jun 5 2003 05:16:27:437PM | 1030605031 | Yijun Lin | 031 Ip~1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nl~0.8 LSN D: demand 0.57 MW, should get 1.45 MW. [0.7, 1.3] Sec. open-loop. E: 1.45 MW [.7-1.3] sec J: 1.76 MW [.7-1.3] sec Result: plasma D: ran. one gap from 0.8 to 0.82 sec. Retry problem. E: ran. clean. 1.7 MW. clean J: ran. 2 trips. about 2 MW. PRF = 4.8 MW. |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Jun 5 2003 08:53:59:800AM | Jim Irby | loaded shot 1030529025 from the last high power rf run will start out with non-axisymmetric coils in opration Yijun just told me that he and Charley just found an unterminated splitter from DC0 on d-port that might explain the control problem. may try x-point sweep if we continue to have problems with injections from the divertor | |
| Jun 5 2003 08:38:11:560AM | 1030605001 | Jim Irby | Start with cycle test --- check data system and gas gs looks a little high |
| Jun 5 2003 09:23:31:883AM | 1030605002 | Jim Irby | pre-fill from 27 to 25 ms reduced argon from 37 to 25 ms until John complains Gary reports a problem with the a-coil breaker --- we may or may not have them for this shot Plasma --- first h-mode actually lasted a while --- 134 kJ, only 100 kJ to go h/(h+d) at 6% at 1.2 s vs 9% during the 5/29 run (shot 25) startup looks very good No a-coil --- contactor not closed Time (ms): 0 5 10 25 ---------------------------------------- % Compiled module: DERIV. Ip (kA): -4.5115 -18.2121 -32.2062 -118.2515 dIp/dt (kA/ms): -1.4241 -2.7796 -3.2100 -7.0591 pressure (mTorr): 0.0647 0.0662 0.0677 0.0669 Bz0 (mT): -3.5554 -1.1766 1.8778 22.2482 Br0 (mT): -1.4500 -1.6009 -1.7910 -1.7759 |
| Jun 5 2003 09:40:35:047AM | 1030605003 | Jim Irby | Density request from 1e20 to 8e19 /m^2 --- a little better for rf? plasma into rampdown --- h-modes not as good --- earl suggests higher not lower density startup still looks good, though pressure was up 5 or 10% h/(h+d) up a little |
| Jun 5 2003 09:58:18:430AM | 1030605004 | Jim Irby | plasma into rampdown rf power 3 av going up to 5 --- good early h-mode --- 162 kJ briefly h-mode starting earlier with more rf power early h/(h+d) at 7% |
| Jun 5 2003 10:17:48:303AM | 1030605005 | Jim Irby | prefill from 25 to 23 ms plasma --- but almost lost it --- gas too low? series short lasting h-modes --- irritation d-port is still not under control --- got nearly 2 MW when programmed for 1 h/(h+d) no change |
| Jun 5 2003 10:39:15:353AM | 1030605006 | Jim Irby | prepuff increased by 1 ms to 24 ms. no plasma and no EF3 |
| Jun 5 2003 10:46:48:480AM | 1030605007 | Jim Irby | Plasma into rampdown --- startup much better still lots of h-modes a-coil back in operation --- turn on at 0.5 s rf power between 3 an 5 MW stored energy about 150 kJ h/d creeping up |
| Jun 5 2003 11:02:16:423AM | 1030605008 | Jim Irby | No PCS changes plasma into rampdown --- startup still looks good no e-port rf --- multiple ratty h-modes h/(h+d) at 7% at 1.2 s |
| Jun 5 2003 11:17:22:003AM | 1030605009 | Jim Irby | No PCS changes startup up not as good --- will drop prefill slightly for next shot plasma into rampdown --- a little more rf power, but troubles with j-port 164 kJ, 41e12 neuts/s |
| Jun 5 2003 11:33:50:353AM | 1030605010 | Jim Irby | Prepuff reduced by 1ms startup good --- little longer h-modes cycle jumped directly to recool --- Tom restarted dispatcher --- data showing up |
| Jun 5 2003 11:46:43:790AM | 1030605011 | Jim Irby | No PCS changes Startup worse again 6 MW peak rf power, but j-port still tripping h-modes look a little better |
| Jun 5 2003 12:03:15:627PM | 1030605012 | Jim Irby | Added back the 1 ms prepuff --- now 24 ms again startup very good --- pressure a little higher as requested plasma into rampdown ---- three h-modes 182 kJ briefly h/(h+d) nearly 8% |
| Jun 5 2003 12:27:16:900PM | 1030605013 | Jim Irby | No PCS changes plasma into rampdown, good startup 187 kJ, a little less j-port power but ran longer w/o fault --- 5.5 MW total 64e12 neuts --> 191 kJ from Earl's scaling law |
| Jun 5 2003 12:43:09:910PM | 1030605013 | Jim Irby | No PCS changes plasma into rampdown, good startup 183 kJ |
| Jun 5 2003 12:44:17:020PM | 1030605014 | Jim Irby | No PCS changes plasma into rampdown --- j-port on a little more |
| Jun 5 2003 12:53:52:503PM | 1030605015 | Jim Irby | No PCS changes Plasma into rampdown --- good startup Catherine mentions we were already in neutron alert territory last shot 195 kJ briefly h/(h+d) 8.2% |
| Jun 5 2003 01:07:12:400PM | 1030605016 | Jim Irby | No PCS changes Plasma into rampdown --- j-port looking better h/(h+d) to 9% 189 kJ |
| Jun 5 2003 01:25:51:943PM | 1030605017 | Jim Irby | No PCS changes --- shot 16 startup not great, but gas, fields, etc looked fine, so leave alone Plasma into rampdown --- 1st h-mode lasted 420 ms, 5.2 MW note that 2Pi foil radiation 50% of shot 14 level h/(h+d) 7.5% |
| Jun 5 2003 01:39:26:917PM | 1030605018 | Jim Irby | No PCS changes Disruption at 1.28 s, injection |
| Jun 5 2003 02:10:59:637PM | 1030605019 | Jim Irby | Reduced prefill by 1 ms Disruption even earlier --- big injection note that more gas is required to maintain density request following the disruption on shot 18 hards early |
| Jun 5 2003 02:22:30:763PM | 1030605020 | Jim Irby | 5 minutes of ecdc --- plus an 18 minute wait no change in gas puff plasma into rampdown, but bad startup --- br0 too positive? |
| Jun 5 2003 02:45:18:610PM | 1030605021 | Jim Irby | Br0 from 0.000 to -.00025 T --- let's pretend to make a change prefill increased by 1 ms Argon disabled for this shot --- too high signal on PPPL spectrometer? 20 minute wait before INIT plasma into rampdown --- startup is better |
| Jun 5 2003 03:04:00:170PM | 1030605022 | Jim Irby | Ip from 1e6 to 0.8e6 Amps plasma into rampdown --- looks like EDA |
| Jun 5 2003 03:13:36:107PM | 1030605023 | Jim Irby | 023. Rowan sitting in for Irby Plasma through ramp down. Next shot: no pcs changes |
| Jun 5 2003 03:27:30:097PM | 1030605024 | Jim Irby | 024. Plasma. 16 minutes since last shot Next shot. No pcs changes. |
| Jun 5 2003 03:54:57:517PM | 1030605025 | Jim Irby | 025. Plasma through rampdown 19 minutes since last shot Next shot: no pcs changes |
| Jun 5 2003 04:08:41:380PM | 1030605026 | Jim Irby | 026. Plasma. Again through ramp down. Next shot: No PCS changes |
| Jun 5 2003 04:36:37:390PM | 1030605027 | Jim Irby | 027. Plasma. Lasted through rampdown. Rowan's last shot. Irby resumes control. |
| Jun 5 2003 04:56:34:220PM | 1030605028 | Jim Irby | Thank you Bill... No PCS changes plasma into rampdown ---- h-factor 1.8 peak (rf_eff = 80%) |
| Jun 5 2003 04:57:04:580PM | 1030605029 | Jim Irby | Plasma into rampdown ---- 5 MW |
| Jun 5 2003 05:03:45:590PM | 1030605030 | Jim Irby | No PCS changes plasma into rampdown --- nice eda, only one j-port trip! |
| Jun 5 2003 05:24:45:247PM | 1030605031 | Jim Irby | For the last shot: increase Ip to 1 MA increase Density to 1.e20 nl04 Plasma to rampdown --- couple of trips on j-port, a few on d-port -- 3 h-modes Great day! |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 08:24:44:433AM | Test | Ok | Data System Test |
| 2 | 09:10:13:633AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 09:29:00:707AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 09:45:50:310AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 10:03:26:740AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 10:18:08:337AM | Plasma | Bad | No EF3 |
| 7 | 10:30:53:117AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 10:48:15:330AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 11:01:48:517AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 11:19:11:010AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 11:32:33:960AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 11:50:16:910AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 12:08:42:823PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 12:31:23:267PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 12:44:40:520PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 12:58:26:430PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 01:11:16:450PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 01:24:16:750PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 01:45:11:863PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 02:11:12:497PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 02:34:16:547PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 02:47:32:177PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 03:06:18:080PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 03:22:58:887PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 03:42:04:400PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 03:55:09:080PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 04:17:10:910PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 04:30:32:867PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 04:43:11:510PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 30 | 04:56:23:517PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 31 | 05:10:39:287PM | Plasma | Ok | |