Alcator C-Mod Run 1031218 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:304
Date Filed: 6/19/2002
Title:H-Mode Regimes
First Author:Martin Greenwald
Session Leader:Dmitri Mossessian (shots 1-30)

Operators
Session leader(s):Dmitri Mossessian
Physics operator(s):Bill Rowan
Engineering operator(s): Unknown

Engineering Operator Run Comment
MP# 304---H-Mode Regimes

Session Leader Plans

Physics Operators Plans

Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:35:493PM
Author: Dmitri Mossessian
Run summary for 1031218 - MP#304 H-mode regime boundaries.

The purpose of the run was to explore the boundary between EDA and ELMing regimes in plasma
current/shape/pedestal density/pedestal temperature space. To obtain the transition between
EDA and ELMy regimes high pedestal density (above 2e20) and temperature (above 500 eV) are
generally required. This kind of pedestal was achieved previusly in discharges with normalized
beta above 1.2. Threfore, high performance plasmas are necessary for successful completion of
this experiment. Unfortunately, we were not able to obtain high performance EDA discharges
that would be comparable to the discharges where ELMs were previously observed. Therefore, no
progress at all was made in carrying out the MP#304.
However, some progress was achieved in understanding the peculiarities of RF heating
and we were able to obtain first long steady state EDA H-modes in this run campaign.
Obtaining steady state EDA H-mode proved to be rather difficult in the present state of the machine.
We started from 1 MA discharge with target line integral density of about 1.1e20, 4 MW RF power lower
triangularity around 0.6 and upper triangularity around 0.4 - a configuration that produced high
performance EDA during 2000 run campaign. This discharge had multiple
transiennt H-modes that terminated when radiated power exceeded input power.
Although QC-mode was present in all H-modes (according to PCI) radiated power
was rising exponentially, cooling the pedestal quickly to temperatures at or
below 300 eV despite high input power. Changing shape (lowering both upper and lower
triangularities) and increasing target density did not improve the situation.
We also tried ECDC between shots attempting to lower the impurity level, but
it did not help. Eventually, we lowered the current to 0.9 MA, which, in
combination with high target density (1.2e20) did produce steady state EDA but
with stored energy of only about 100 kJ at 4 MW input power. The radiated
power on this shot decreased by a factor of 2 comparec to maximum level on
previous shots. It is not clear whether the current change is
the real reason why steady state EDA appeared since after that we were able to
achieve long steady state EDA at 1MA. Most likely first 11 discharges (may be
in combination with ECDC) conditionned the walls enough to produce better QC
mode and lower impurity level.
After obtaining steady state EDA at 1 MA we attempted target density and power scan to
optimize plasma performance. Raising targt density as high as 1.3e20 and
increasing RF power to 6.2 MW we were able to achieve only 150 kJ of stored
energy. Basically, all the discharges we had are on the lower edge of the
deltaW vs P_rf curve indicating very poor machine performance.
Finally, we attempted to evaluate the realtive contribution of J-port power
to the heating. First, the discharge was ran with 3.2 MW power from D and E
antennas only. It had an EDA with W=120 kJ - only 30 kJ lower than the shot
with 6.2 MW RF power. Then we repeated the same plasma with 3.2 MW from J-port
only. Although J-port antenna did not run well without D and E, it looks like
3 MW from J can produce about the same stored energy as similar power from D
and E. The conclusion seems to be that RF heating is efficient below 3 MW, but
the efficiency drops nonlinearly as the power is raised above 3 MW level.

Details:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218001 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 9:41:52:630AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multiple H-modes - RF trips a lot. nl=9.3e19

Next shot: increase target nl to 1.1e20, ask for 2 levels of RF - 4 MW from
0.6 to 1 sec, 5 MW from 1 to 1.5 sec
Also increase right gap by 2 mm for better RF coupling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218002 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 9:45:37:226AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multiple H-modes again. QC mode is seen on PCI, but radiation kills H-modes -
no steady state EDA.

Next shot - try to incraese nl more.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218003 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 9:56:05:856AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
J-port did not work. RF levels are 2 and 2.5 MW.
In both phases strong QC mode on PCI, but the second segment (2.5 MW)
is interrupted by bursts of ELMs (type III ?).
Radiation is our main problem.

Next shot - try to move lower x-point out va little to decrease delta to 0.53
and move
strike point onto the vertical plate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218004 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 10:31:31:010AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rf is better but trips a lot. Got EDAs, but radiation kills it quick,
destroying QC mode into type III.

Next shot - repeat with better RF
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218005 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 10:31:44:790AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fizzle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218006 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 10:39:48:153AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RF is bad again. Also P_rad is so high that Te_ped is only about 300 eV at 5
MW.
QC mode is again killed by radiation.

Next shot - ECED between shots for 10 min.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218007 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 11:05:33:786AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ECDC seems to make things a little better - we got somewhat longer EDAs, but
the radiation is still
very high and, although we are going from 4 to 5 MW, Te_ped falls and QC mode
deteriorates into type III ELMs.

Next shot - keep doing ECDC. Tune RF to get steadyer 5 MW level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218010 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 12:19:28:816PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Smaller upper delta (0.37) makes weeker QC mode. But generally, the situation
is
the same as on previous shots - radiation is too high and H-modes are too
short with
very low pedestal temperature.

Next shot - lower RF power (3 MW and 4 MW instead of 4 and 5)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218009 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 12:24:43:506PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Similar to 8.

Next shot - reduce upper triangularity to 0.35
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218011 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 12:49:07:813PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Same thing.
Next shot - raise q by going to 0.9 MA, decrease left gap to 1 cm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218012 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 1:06:21:976PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Higher q makes H-mode more EDA-like. But w is down to 100 kJ
and pedestal density is down to 1.5e20.

Next shot - raise target nl to 1.2 e20 to get higher pedestal
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218013 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 1:12:02:743PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Good steady EDA, but with low W (90 kJ) and very low pedestal density (1.2e20)
and temperature (300 eV)

Next - try to get more RF
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218014 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 1:26:07:623PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Good steady EDA, as on shot 13. RF is still bad

Next shot - try to improve Rf
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218015 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 1:43:57:223PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Good steady EDA, as on shot 14. RF is still bad

Next shot - change shape (delta_u 0.37 -> 0.3, delta_l 0.5 -> 0.55) to change
RF coupling
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218016 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 1:56:48:073PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
J port did not run because of high pressure. D and E are OK, making EDA at 2
MW

Next - reduce target 1.1e20 to make it easier for J
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218017 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 2:06:44:700PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Power is back up. The EDa is better than previous shot, W=100 kJ, Te_ped = 400
eV with 3 MW, but
300 eV at 4 MW !

Next shot - go back to 1 MA leaving everything else as is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218020 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 2:50:02:233PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Two H-modes, the first is more ELM-free, the second is steady EDA but with
lower Te_ped, although RF is higher.

Next - 4 MW of RF from the beginning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218021 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 3:01:41:753PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
First H-mode is steady state but is terminated by a large injection. Second
has lower Te_ped as usual.

Next shot - repeat
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218022 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 3:19:10:200PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In first H-mode P_rad is rising linearly and destroys H-mode while density is
almost
constant. It means that the radiation comes from high Z impurities in EDA
H-mode.
Second H-mode has lower Te_ped as usual.

Next shot - increase target nl to 1.3e20
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218023 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 3:29:53:013PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Steady state EDA for the duration of RF (4 MW). Confinement is bad - W=125 kJ

Next shot - higher RF power
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218024 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 4:23:54:066PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long steady EDA with 5.5 MW RF, W=134 kJ

Next shot - more power
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218025 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 4:24:28:880PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long steady EDA with 6.2 MW RF, W=150 kJ

Next shot - turn J port antenna off
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218026 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 4:25:57:520PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long steady EDA with 3.2 MW RF, W=121 kJ - only 30 kJ lower than with
additional 2 MW from J

Next shot - turn D and E on for short period and then leave only J port on
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218028 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 4:53:40:140PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
J port does not wotk at this target density.

Next shot - lower target nl to 1e20. Run only D and E at 3 MW
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218029 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 4:54:19:390PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short H-mode with rising P_rad. W=118 kJ at 2.8 MW from D and E only
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218030 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 5:02:02:956PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trying the same thing with J port only.

J port worked for 100 msec only 100 msec, but confinement is comparable to
previous shot with D and E.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031218027 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 23 2003 3:01:56:836PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
J port did not work at all, but we got long H-mode with type III ELMs on Ohmic
power only

Next shot - try to repeat with longer period of D and E to make J running


Physics Operator Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:37:20:100PM
Author: Bill Rowan
Physics Operator Summary for Thursday, December 18, 2003
Run 1031218

Purpose: MP# 304 --- H-Mode Regimes

Physics operator: Rowan
Session leader : Mossessian

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Summary-----------------------------------------------------------------

The intent in this run was to scan the boundaries of EDA H-mode. The mode
was not obtained until late in the run. The absorbed power was low thus
isolating the work in a regime that the SL found uninteresting for the purposes
of the miniproposal. Some progress was made in simply finding the right
conditions to produce EDA.

Machine prep for the run consisted of ECDC in helium and baking. Shot 1031217019
(SNL) was loaded from the previous run. There were H-modes, but they ended
due to excess radiated power: After the formation of the H-mode, the bolometer
signal reached a peak and suddenly collapsed to a lower level as the plasma
transitioned out of H-mode. QC mode was clearly visible on the PCI diagnostic.

For a handful of sequential shots, ECDC in D2 was applied between shots. After
that, we made slight changes in shape. The EDA H-mode appeared for parameters
that we covered earlier in the day. See the SL log for details.


Score Card--------------------------------------------------------------
Plasmas 29 (001-004, 006-030)
Early disruptions 0
Fizzles 1
Duds 0

Total 30

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Engineering Setup--------------------------------------------------------------
ECDC overnight in He at 9e-5 Torr, stopping at 7 AM
Bake at 60 C overnight

Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 17:00.

Power systems the same as on 1031217019.

A-coils should be hooked up as on 1031204021 and the power supply should be enabled.

Gas setup:
fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4)
fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar Hybrid enabled (PG1)
leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2)
fill C-side with 30 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3)

Enable gatevalves (there will be no vacuum problems): ECE, VUV, DNB

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RF Setup: All 4 transmitters in Run On by 08:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Run plan for 1031218, MP 304 H-mode regimes-----------------------------

We will try to explore ELMy boundaries depending on triangularity and q. We
should start with a single null shot (one from 1031217) with
target nl=1.2e20, Ip=1 MA, upper delta=0.3, lower delta=0.5, and max RF power
(6 MW ?) establishing high performance discharge. When we get beta_norm above
1.3 (and hopefully see ELMs) we will do the RF power scan (two or three levels
of RF power in one shot) establishing the power boundary between ELMs and EDA.
The scan should be repeated for different values of delta and current. We will
use three values for upper delta (0.2, 0.4 and 0.7) and two values for lower
delta (0.5 and 0.7) at three plasma currents (0.7 MA, 1 MA and 1.2 MA)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Log---------------------------------------------------------------------


Overnight ECDC in helium. ECDC off at 7am


001. Plasma.

Next shot.
nl_04 to 1.1e+20
Increase the outer gap by 2 mm (reduce RCUR by 1 mm)

002. Plasma
nl_04 = 1.0e+20
outer gap approx 1 cm

Next shot.
nl_04 = 1.2e+20

003. Plasma
nl_04 = 1.2e+20 just before the RF

Next shot.
Move rxl out by 1 cm.

004.
lower triangularity is 0.53
shot 003 was approx 0.6

Next shot Repeat to improve RF

005. Fizzle

Next shot.
Reduced the prefill from 25 ms to 20 ms.

006. Plasma

Next shot. ECDC in D2

007. Plasma.

Next shot. ECDC in D2 for 10 minutes

008. Plasma

Next shot,
ECDC in D2 for 10 minutes.
Reduce the nl_04 demand to 1.1e+20

009. Plasma

Next shot. ECDC in D2 for 10 minutes
Reduced upper triangularity: RXU increased by 2 cm
Reduce the nl_04 demand to 1.0e+20

010. Plasma
Upper triangularity is approx 0.37

Next shot. ECDC in D2 for 10 minutes


011. Plasma

Next shot:
Decrease the plasma current to 0.9 MA
Decrease the inner gap by 1 cm.


012. Plasma
Inner gap is 1 cm.
Ip is 0.9 MA

Next shot.
Increase the target nl_04 to 1.2e+20

013. Plasma

Next shot.
No PCS changes.

014. Plasma.

Next shot.
No PCS changes

015. Plasma


Next shot.
Decrease RXL by 0.5 cm
Increase RXU by 1 cm

016. Plasma
upper triangularity = 0.318
lower triangularity = 0.53

Next shot.
nl_04 demand = 1.1e+20

017. Plasma
nl_04 = 1.1e+20

Next shot.
Increase IP to 1 MA

018. Plasma

Next shot.
No successful PCS changes

019. Plasma

Next shot.
Increase nl_04 demand to 1.2e+20

020. Plasma

Next shot.
No pcs changes


021. Plasma.
Injection at 0.76s

Next shot
No changes

022. Plasma

Next shot.
Increase nl_04 demand to 1.3e+20

023. Plasma.

Next shot.
No pcs changes

024. Plasma

Next shot.
No pcs changes

025. Plasma

Next shot.
No pcs changes.

026. Plasma

Next shot
No pcs changes

027. Plasma

Next shot.
No pcs changes


028. Plasma

Next shot.
nl_04 = 1.0e+20

029. Plasma

Next shot.
No pcs changes

030. Plasma.


























































Session Leader Comments
Dec 18 2003 09:41:52:630AM1031218001Dmitri MossessianMultiple H-modes - RF trips a lot. nl=9.3e19

Next shot: increase target nl to 1.1e20, ask for 2 levels of RF - 4 MW from 0.6 to 1 sec, 5 MW from 1 to 1.5 sec
Also increase right gap by 2 mm for better RF coupling.
Dec 18 2003 09:45:37:227AM1031218002Dmitri MossessianMultiple H-modes again. QC mode is seen on PCI, but radiation kills H-modes - no steady state EDA.

Next shot - try to incraese nl more.
Dec 18 2003 09:56:05:857AM1031218003Dmitri MossessianJ-port did not work. RF levels are 2 and 2.5 MW.
In both phases strong QC mode on PCI, but the second segment (2.5 MW)
is interrupted by bursts of ELMs (type III ?).
Radiation is our main problem.

Next shot - try to move lower x-point out va little to decrease delta to 0.53 and move
strike point onto the vertical plate
Dec 18 2003 10:31:31:010AM1031218004Dmitri MossessianRf is better but trips a lot. Got EDAs, but radiation kills it quick, destroying QC mode into type III.

Next shot - repeat with better RF
Dec 18 2003 10:31:44:790AM1031218005Dmitri MossessianFizzle.
Dec 18 2003 10:39:48:153AM1031218006Dmitri MossessianRF is bad again. Also P_rad is so high that Te_ped is only about 300 eV at 5 MW.
QC mode is again killed by radiation.

Next shot - ECED between shots for 10 min.
Dec 18 2003 11:05:33:787AM1031218007Dmitri MossessianECDC seems to make things a little better - we got somewhat longer EDAs, but the radiation is still
very high and, although we are going from 4 to 5 MW, Te_ped falls and QC mode deteriorates into type III ELMs.

Next shot - keep doing ECDC. Tune RF to get steadyer 5 MW level.
Dec 18 2003 12:24:43:507PM1031218009Dmitri MossessianSimilar to 8.

Next shot - reduce upper triangularity to 0.35
Dec 18 2003 12:19:28:817PM1031218010Dmitri MossessianSmaller upper delta (0.37) makes weeker QC mode. But generally, the situation is
the same as on previous shots - radiation is too high and H-modes are too short with
very low pedestal temperature.

Next shot - lower RF power (3 MW and 4 MW instead of 4 and 5)
Dec 18 2003 12:49:07:813PM1031218011Dmitri MossessianSame thing.
Next shot - raise q by going to 0.9 MA, decrease left gap to 1 cm.
Dec 18 2003 01:06:21:977PM1031218012Dmitri MossessianHigher q makes H-mode more EDA-like. But w is down to 100 kJ
and pedestal density is down to 1.5e20.

Next shot - raise target nl to 1.2 e20 to get higher pedestal
Dec 18 2003 01:12:02:743PM1031218013Dmitri MossessianGood steady EDA, but with low W (90 kJ) and very low pedestal density (1.2e20) and temperature (300 eV)

Next - try to get more RF
Dec 18 2003 01:26:07:623PM1031218014Dmitri MossessianGood steady EDA, as on shot 13. RF is still bad

Next shot - try to improve Rf
Dec 18 2003 01:43:57:223PM1031218015Dmitri MossessianGood steady EDA, as on shot 14. RF is still bad

Next shot - change shape (delta_u 0.37 -> 0.3, delta_l 0.5 -> 0.55) to change RF coupling
Dec 18 2003 01:56:48:073PM1031218016Dmitri MossessianJ port did not run because of high pressure. D and E are OK, making EDA at 2 MW

Next - reduce target 1.1e20 to make it easier for J
Dec 18 2003 02:06:44:700PM1031218017Dmitri MossessianPower is back up. The EDa is better than previous shot, W=100 kJ, Te_ped = 400 eV with 3 MW, but
300 eV at 4 MW !

Next shot - go back to 1 MA leaving everything else as is.
Dec 18 2003 02:50:02:233PM1031218020Dmitri MossessianTwo H-modes, the first is more ELM-free, the second is steady EDA but with lower Te_ped, although RF is higher.

Next - 4 MW of RF from the beginning.
Dec 18 2003 03:01:41:753PM1031218021Dmitri MossessianFirst H-mode is steady state but is terminated by a large injection. Second has lower Te_ped as usual.

Next shot - repeat
Dec 18 2003 03:19:10:200PM1031218022Dmitri MossessianIn first H-mode P_rad is rising linearly and destroys H-mode while density is almost
constant. It means that the radiation comes from high Z impurities in EDA H-mode.
Second H-mode has lower Te_ped as usual.

Next shot - increase target nl to 1.3e20
Dec 18 2003 03:29:53:013PM1031218023Dmitri MossessianSteady state EDA for the duration of RF (4 MW). Confinement is bad - W=125 kJ

Next shot - higher RF power
Dec 18 2003 04:23:54:067PM1031218024Dmitri MossessianLong steady EDA with 5.5 MW RF, W=134 kJ

Next shot - more power
Dec 18 2003 04:24:28:880PM1031218025Dmitri MossessianLong steady EDA with 6.2 MW RF, W=150 kJ

Next shot - turn J port antenna off
Dec 18 2003 04:25:57:520PM1031218026Dmitri MossessianLong steady EDA with 3.2 MW RF, W=121 kJ - only 30 kJ lower than with additional 2 MW from J

Next shot - turn D and E on for short period and then leave only J port on
Dec 23 2003 03:01:56:837PM1031218027Dmitri MossessianJ port did not work at all, but we got long H-mode with type III ELMs on Ohmic power only

Next shot - try to repeat with longer period of D and E to make J running
Dec 18 2003 04:53:40:140PM1031218028Dmitri MossessianJ port does not wotk at this target density.

Next shot - lower target nl to 1e20. Run only D and E at 3 MW
Dec 18 2003 04:54:19:390PM1031218029Dmitri MossessianShort H-mode with rising P_rad. W=118 kJ at 2.8 MW from D and E only
Dec 18 2003 05:02:02:957PM1031218030Dmitri MossessianTrying the same thing with J port only.

J port worked for 100 msec only 100 msec, but confinement is comparable to previous shot with D and E.
Dec 18 2003 09:04:30:633AM1031218033Dmitri MossessianRun plan for 1031218, MP 304 H-mode regimes

We will try to explore ELMy boundaries depending on triangularity and q.
We should start with a single null shot (one from 1031217) with
target nl=1.2e20, Ip=1 MA, upper delta=0.3, lower delta=0.5, and max RF power (6 MW ?)
establishing high performance discharge. When we get beta_norm above 1.3 (and hopefully see ELMs)
we will do the RF power scan (two or three levels of RF power in one shot) establishing
the power boundary between ELMs and EDA. The scan should be repeated for different values of
delta and current. We will use three values for upper delta (0.2, 0.4 and 0.7) and two values
for lower delta (0.5 and 0.7) at three plasma currents (0.7 MA, 1 MA and 1.2 MA)

First shot is 1031217019 - the best EDA from yesterday with delta_u=0.48, delta_l=0.6, 1 MA, nl=1e20

Physics Operator Comments
Dec 18 2003 07:49:02:917AMBill RowanEngineering setup for Thursday, December 18, 2003

MP# 304 --- H-Mode Regimes

Session leader : Mossessian
Physics operator: Rowan


ECDC overnight in He at 9e-5 Torr, stopping at 7 AM
Bake at 60 C overnight

Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 17:00.

Power systems the same as on 1031217019.

A-coils should be hooked up as on 1031204021 and the power supply should be enabled.

Gas setup:
fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4)
fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar Hybrid enabled (PG1)
leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2)
fill C-side with 30 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3)

Enable gatevalves (there will be no vacuum problems): ECE, VUV, DNB

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RF Setup: All 4 transmitters in Run On by 08:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Run plan for 1031218, MP 304 H-mode regimes

We will try to explore ELMy boundaries depending on triangularity and q. We
should start with a single null shot (one from 1031217) with
target nl=1.2e20, Ip=1 MA, upper delta=0.3, lower delta=0.5, and max RF power
(6 MW ?) establishing high performance discharge. When we get beta_norm above
1.3 (and hopefully see ELMs) we will do the RF power scan (two or three levels
of RF power in one shot) establishing the power boundary between ELMs and EDA.
The scan should be repeated for different values of delta and current. We will
use three values for upper delta (0.2, 0.4 and 0.7) and two values for lower
delta (0.5 and 0.7) at three plasma currents (0.7 MA, 1 MA and 1.2 MA)


Overnight ECDC in helium. ECDC off at 7am



Dec 18 2003 09:12:58:777AM1031218001Bill Rowan001. Plasma.
Dec 18 2003 09:20:50:230AM1031218001Bill Rowan
Next shot.
nl_04 to 1.1e+20
Increase the outer gap by 2 mm (reduce RCUR by 1 mm)
Dec 18 2003 09:29:15:343AM1031218002Bill Rowan002. Plasma
nl_04 = 1.0e+20
outer gap approx 1 cm
Dec 18 2003 09:37:10:910AM1031218002Bill Rowan
Next shot.
nl_04 = 1.2e+20
Dec 18 2003 09:42:37:553AM1031218003Bill Rowan
003. Plasma
nl_04 = 1.2e+20 just before the RF
Dec 18 2003 09:56:01:167AM1031218003Bill Rowan
Next shot.
Move rxl out by 1 cm.
Dec 18 2003 10:05:13:907AM1031218004Bill Rowan004.
lower triangularity is 0.53
shot 003 was approx 0.6

Next shot Repeat to improve RF
Dec 18 2003 10:30:40:057AM1031218005Bill Rowan
005. Fizzle

Next shot.
Reduced the prefill from 25 ms to 20 ms.
Dec 18 2003 10:38:50:870AM1031218006Bill Rowan006. Plasma

Next shot. ECDC in D2
Dec 18 2003 11:00:42:100AM1031218007Bill Rowan007. Plasma.

Next shot. ECDC in D2 for 10 minutes
Dec 18 2003 11:24:08:810AM1031218008Bill Rowan008. Plasma
Dec 18 2003 11:29:24:170AM1031218008Bill Rowan
Next shot,
ECDC in D2 for 10 minutes.
Reduce the nl_04 demand to 1.1e+20
Dec 18 2003 11:55:42:290AM1031218009Bill RowanReduce the nl_04 demand to 1.0e+20
Dec 18 2003 12:47:51:920PM1031218011Bill Rowan011. Plasma

Next shot:
Decrease the plasma current to 0.9 MA
Decrease the inner gap by 1 cm.
Dec 18 2003 01:00:14:097PM1031218012Bill Rowan012. Plasma
Inner gap is 1 cm.
Ip is 0.9 MA

Next shot.
Increase the target nl_04 to 1.2e+20
Dec 18 2003 01:09:49:553PM1031218013Bill Rowan013. Plasma

Next shot.
No PCS changes.
Dec 18 2003 01:26:12:013PM1031218014Bill Rowan014. Plasma.

Next shot.
No PCS changes
Dec 18 2003 01:45:00:880PM1031218015Bill Rowan015. Plasma


Next shot.
Decrease RXL by 0.5 cm
Increase RXU by 1 cm
Dec 18 2003 01:55:16:197PM1031218016Bill Rowan016. Plasma
upper triangularity = 0.318
lower triangularity = 0.53

Next shot.
nl_04 demand = 1.1e+20
Dec 18 2003 02:07:12:560PM1031218017Bill Rowan017. Plasma
nl_04 = 1.1e+20

Next shot.
Increase IP to 1 MA
Dec 18 2003 02:32:54:023PM1031218018Bill Rowan018. Plasma

Next shot.
No successful PCS changes
Dec 18 2003 03:02:46:440PM1031218019Bill Rowan019. Plasma

Next shot.
Increase nl_04 demand to 1.2e+20
Dec 18 2003 02:49:20:860PM1031218020Bill Rowan020. Plasma

Next shot.
No pcs changes
Dec 18 2003 03:01:31:143PM1031218021Bill Rowan021. Plasma.
Injection at 0.76s

Next shot
No changes
Dec 18 2003 03:17:22:527PM1031218022Bill Rowan022. Plasma

Next shot.
Increase nl_04 demand to 1.3e+20
Dec 18 2003 03:28:57:670PM1031218023Bill Rowan023. Plasma.

Next shot.
No pcs changes
Dec 18 2003 03:42:24:940PM1031218024Bill Rowan024. Plasma
Dec 18 2003 03:44:33:490PM1031218024Bill Rowan024. Plasma

Next shot.
No pcs changes
Dec 18 2003 04:06:10:933PM1031218025Bill Rowan025. Plasma

Next shot.
No pcs changes.
Dec 18 2003 04:06:57:170PM1031218026Bill Rowan026. Plasma

Next shot
No pcs changes
Dec 18 2003 04:23:30:410PM1031218027Bill Rowan027. Plasma

Next shot.
No pcs changes
Dec 18 2003 04:29:40:850PM1031218028Bill Rowan028. Plasma

Next shot.
nl_04 = 1.0e+20
Dec 18 2003 04:47:31:840PM1031218029Bill Rowan029. Plasma

Next shot.
No pcs changes
Dec 18 2003 04:55:30:720PM1031218030Bill Rowan030. Plasma.

Last shot.


Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
109:10:26:137AMPlasmaOk
209:23:20:403AMPlasmaOk
309:38:03:927AMPlasmaOk
409:59:57:480AMPlasmaOk
510:13:06:313AMPlasmaOk
610:31:17:883AMPlasmaOk
710:56:35:080AMPlasmaOk
811:21:37:653AMPlasmaOk
911:47:49:570AMPlasmaOk
1012:12:47:330PMPlasmaOk
1112:37:29:543PMPlasmaOk
1212:51:33:970PMPlasmaOk
1301:04:47:770PMPlasmaOk
1401:17:28:510PMPlasmaOk
1501:35:45:237PMPlasmaOk
1601:48:26:053PMPlasmaOk
1702:01:12:073PMPlasmaOk
1802:13:44:063PMPlasmaOk
1902:26:37:193PMPlasmaOk
2002:43:10:497PMPlasmaOk
2102:55:33:907PMPlasmaOk
2203:08:21:333PMPlasmaOk
2303:21:32:463PMPlasmaOk
2403:34:31:797PMPlasmaOk
2503:47:12:223PMPlasmaOk
2604:00:00:620PMPlasmaOk
2704:12:39:830PMPlasmaOk
2804:26:19:817PMPlasmaOk
2904:39:47:430PMPlasmaOk
3004:52:35:170PMPlasmaOk