| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Dmitri Mossessian |
| Physics operator(s): | Bill Rowan |
| Engineering operator(s): | Unknown |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| MP# 304---H-Mode Regimes |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:35:493PM |
| Author: Dmitri Mossessian |
| Run summary for 1031218 - MP#304 H-mode regime boundaries. The purpose of the run was to explore the boundary between EDA and ELMing regimes in plasma current/shape/pedestal density/pedestal temperature space. To obtain the transition between EDA and ELMy regimes high pedestal density (above 2e20) and temperature (above 500 eV) are generally required. This kind of pedestal was achieved previusly in discharges with normalized beta above 1.2. Threfore, high performance plasmas are necessary for successful completion of this experiment. Unfortunately, we were not able to obtain high performance EDA discharges that would be comparable to the discharges where ELMs were previously observed. Therefore, no progress at all was made in carrying out the MP#304. However, some progress was achieved in understanding the peculiarities of RF heating and we were able to obtain first long steady state EDA H-modes in this run campaign. Obtaining steady state EDA H-mode proved to be rather difficult in the present state of the machine. We started from 1 MA discharge with target line integral density of about 1.1e20, 4 MW RF power lower triangularity around 0.6 and upper triangularity around 0.4 - a configuration that produced high performance EDA during 2000 run campaign. This discharge had multiple transiennt H-modes that terminated when radiated power exceeded input power. Although QC-mode was present in all H-modes (according to PCI) radiated power was rising exponentially, cooling the pedestal quickly to temperatures at or below 300 eV despite high input power. Changing shape (lowering both upper and lower triangularities) and increasing target density did not improve the situation. We also tried ECDC between shots attempting to lower the impurity level, but it did not help. Eventually, we lowered the current to 0.9 MA, which, in combination with high target density (1.2e20) did produce steady state EDA but with stored energy of only about 100 kJ at 4 MW input power. The radiated power on this shot decreased by a factor of 2 comparec to maximum level on previous shots. It is not clear whether the current change is the real reason why steady state EDA appeared since after that we were able to achieve long steady state EDA at 1MA. Most likely first 11 discharges (may be in combination with ECDC) conditionned the walls enough to produce better QC mode and lower impurity level. After obtaining steady state EDA at 1 MA we attempted target density and power scan to optimize plasma performance. Raising targt density as high as 1.3e20 and increasing RF power to 6.2 MW we were able to achieve only 150 kJ of stored energy. Basically, all the discharges we had are on the lower edge of the deltaW vs P_rf curve indicating very poor machine performance. Finally, we attempted to evaluate the realtive contribution of J-port power to the heating. First, the discharge was ran with 3.2 MW power from D and E antennas only. It had an EDA with W=120 kJ - only 30 kJ lower than the shot with 6.2 MW RF power. Then we repeated the same plasma with 3.2 MW from J-port only. Although J-port antenna did not run well without D and E, it looks like 3 MW from J can produce about the same stored energy as similar power from D and E. The conclusion seems to be that RF heating is efficient below 3 MW, but the efficiency drops nonlinearly as the power is raised above 3 MW level. Details: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218001 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 9:41:52:630AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Multiple H-modes - RF trips a lot. nl=9.3e19 Next shot: increase target nl to 1.1e20, ask for 2 levels of RF - 4 MW from 0.6 to 1 sec, 5 MW from 1 to 1.5 sec Also increase right gap by 2 mm for better RF coupling. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218002 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 9:45:37:226AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Multiple H-modes again. QC mode is seen on PCI, but radiation kills H-modes - no steady state EDA. Next shot - try to incraese nl more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218003 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 9:56:05:856AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J-port did not work. RF levels are 2 and 2.5 MW. In both phases strong QC mode on PCI, but the second segment (2.5 MW) is interrupted by bursts of ELMs (type III ?). Radiation is our main problem. Next shot - try to move lower x-point out va little to decrease delta to 0.53 and move strike point onto the vertical plate ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218004 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 10:31:31:010AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rf is better but trips a lot. Got EDAs, but radiation kills it quick, destroying QC mode into type III. Next shot - repeat with better RF ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218005 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 10:31:44:790AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fizzle. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218006 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 10:39:48:153AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RF is bad again. Also P_rad is so high that Te_ped is only about 300 eV at 5 MW. QC mode is again killed by radiation. Next shot - ECED between shots for 10 min. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218007 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 11:05:33:786AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ECDC seems to make things a little better - we got somewhat longer EDAs, but the radiation is still very high and, although we are going from 4 to 5 MW, Te_ped falls and QC mode deteriorates into type III ELMs. Next shot - keep doing ECDC. Tune RF to get steadyer 5 MW level. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218010 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 12:19:28:816PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Smaller upper delta (0.37) makes weeker QC mode. But generally, the situation is the same as on previous shots - radiation is too high and H-modes are too short with very low pedestal temperature. Next shot - lower RF power (3 MW and 4 MW instead of 4 and 5) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218009 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 12:24:43:506PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Similar to 8. Next shot - reduce upper triangularity to 0.35 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218011 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 12:49:07:813PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Same thing. Next shot - raise q by going to 0.9 MA, decrease left gap to 1 cm. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218012 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 1:06:21:976PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Higher q makes H-mode more EDA-like. But w is down to 100 kJ and pedestal density is down to 1.5e20. Next shot - raise target nl to 1.2 e20 to get higher pedestal ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218013 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 1:12:02:743PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Good steady EDA, but with low W (90 kJ) and very low pedestal density (1.2e20) and temperature (300 eV) Next - try to get more RF ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218014 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 1:26:07:623PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Good steady EDA, as on shot 13. RF is still bad Next shot - try to improve Rf ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218015 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 1:43:57:223PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Good steady EDA, as on shot 14. RF is still bad Next shot - change shape (delta_u 0.37 -> 0.3, delta_l 0.5 -> 0.55) to change RF coupling ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218016 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 1:56:48:073PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J port did not run because of high pressure. D and E are OK, making EDA at 2 MW Next - reduce target 1.1e20 to make it easier for J ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218017 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 2:06:44:700PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Power is back up. The EDa is better than previous shot, W=100 kJ, Te_ped = 400 eV with 3 MW, but 300 eV at 4 MW ! Next shot - go back to 1 MA leaving everything else as is. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218020 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 2:50:02:233PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Two H-modes, the first is more ELM-free, the second is steady EDA but with lower Te_ped, although RF is higher. Next - 4 MW of RF from the beginning. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218021 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 3:01:41:753PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . First H-mode is steady state but is terminated by a large injection. Second has lower Te_ped as usual. Next shot - repeat ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218022 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 3:19:10:200PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . In first H-mode P_rad is rising linearly and destroys H-mode while density is almost constant. It means that the radiation comes from high Z impurities in EDA H-mode. Second H-mode has lower Te_ped as usual. Next shot - increase target nl to 1.3e20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218023 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 3:29:53:013PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Steady state EDA for the duration of RF (4 MW). Confinement is bad - W=125 kJ Next shot - higher RF power ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218024 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 4:23:54:066PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long steady EDA with 5.5 MW RF, W=134 kJ Next shot - more power ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218025 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 4:24:28:880PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long steady EDA with 6.2 MW RF, W=150 kJ Next shot - turn J port antenna off ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218026 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 4:25:57:520PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long steady EDA with 3.2 MW RF, W=121 kJ - only 30 kJ lower than with additional 2 MW from J Next shot - turn D and E on for short period and then leave only J port on ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218028 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 4:53:40:140PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J port does not wotk at this target density. Next shot - lower target nl to 1e20. Run only D and E at 3 MW ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218029 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 4:54:19:390PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short H-mode with rising P_rad. W=118 kJ at 2.8 MW from D and E only ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218030 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 18 2003 5:02:02:956PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Trying the same thing with J port only. J port worked for 100 msec only 100 msec, but confinement is comparable to previous shot with D and E. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1031218027 mossessian SESSION_LEADER Dec 23 2003 3:01:56:836PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J port did not work at all, but we got long H-mode with type III ELMs on Ohmic power only Next shot - try to repeat with longer period of D and E to make J running |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:37:20:100PM |
| Author: Bill Rowan |
| Physics Operator Summary for Thursday, December 18, 2003 Run 1031218 Purpose: MP# 304 --- H-Mode Regimes Physics operator: Rowan Session leader : Mossessian =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Summary----------------------------------------------------------------- The intent in this run was to scan the boundaries of EDA H-mode. The mode was not obtained until late in the run. The absorbed power was low thus isolating the work in a regime that the SL found uninteresting for the purposes of the miniproposal. Some progress was made in simply finding the right conditions to produce EDA. Machine prep for the run consisted of ECDC in helium and baking. Shot 1031217019 (SNL) was loaded from the previous run. There were H-modes, but they ended due to excess radiated power: After the formation of the H-mode, the bolometer signal reached a peak and suddenly collapsed to a lower level as the plasma transitioned out of H-mode. QC mode was clearly visible on the PCI diagnostic. For a handful of sequential shots, ECDC in D2 was applied between shots. After that, we made slight changes in shape. The EDA H-mode appeared for parameters that we covered earlier in the day. See the SL log for details. Score Card-------------------------------------------------------------- Plasmas 29 (001-004, 006-030) Early disruptions 0 Fizzles 1 Duds 0 Total 30 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Engineering Setup-------------------------------------------------------------- ECDC overnight in He at 9e-5 Torr, stopping at 7 AM Bake at 60 C overnight Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 17:00. Power systems the same as on 1031217019. A-coils should be hooked up as on 1031204021 and the power supply should be enabled. Gas setup: fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar Hybrid enabled (PG1) leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) fill C-side with 30 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3) Enable gatevalves (there will be no vacuum problems): ECE, VUV, DNB ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RF Setup: All 4 transmitters in Run On by 08:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Run plan for 1031218, MP 304 H-mode regimes----------------------------- We will try to explore ELMy boundaries depending on triangularity and q. We should start with a single null shot (one from 1031217) with target nl=1.2e20, Ip=1 MA, upper delta=0.3, lower delta=0.5, and max RF power (6 MW ?) establishing high performance discharge. When we get beta_norm above 1.3 (and hopefully see ELMs) we will do the RF power scan (two or three levels of RF power in one shot) establishing the power boundary between ELMs and EDA. The scan should be repeated for different values of delta and current. We will use three values for upper delta (0.2, 0.4 and 0.7) and two values for lower delta (0.5 and 0.7) at three plasma currents (0.7 MA, 1 MA and 1.2 MA) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Log--------------------------------------------------------------------- Overnight ECDC in helium. ECDC off at 7am 001. Plasma. Next shot. nl_04 to 1.1e+20 Increase the outer gap by 2 mm (reduce RCUR by 1 mm) 002. Plasma nl_04 = 1.0e+20 outer gap approx 1 cm Next shot. nl_04 = 1.2e+20 003. Plasma nl_04 = 1.2e+20 just before the RF Next shot. Move rxl out by 1 cm. 004. lower triangularity is 0.53 shot 003 was approx 0.6 Next shot Repeat to improve RF 005. Fizzle Next shot. Reduced the prefill from 25 ms to 20 ms. 006. Plasma Next shot. ECDC in D2 007. Plasma. Next shot. ECDC in D2 for 10 minutes 008. Plasma Next shot, ECDC in D2 for 10 minutes. Reduce the nl_04 demand to 1.1e+20 009. Plasma Next shot. ECDC in D2 for 10 minutes Reduced upper triangularity: RXU increased by 2 cm Reduce the nl_04 demand to 1.0e+20 010. Plasma Upper triangularity is approx 0.37 Next shot. ECDC in D2 for 10 minutes 011. Plasma Next shot: Decrease the plasma current to 0.9 MA Decrease the inner gap by 1 cm. 012. Plasma Inner gap is 1 cm. Ip is 0.9 MA Next shot. Increase the target nl_04 to 1.2e+20 013. Plasma Next shot. No PCS changes. 014. Plasma. Next shot. No PCS changes 015. Plasma Next shot. Decrease RXL by 0.5 cm Increase RXU by 1 cm 016. Plasma upper triangularity = 0.318 lower triangularity = 0.53 Next shot. nl_04 demand = 1.1e+20 017. Plasma nl_04 = 1.1e+20 Next shot. Increase IP to 1 MA 018. Plasma Next shot. No successful PCS changes 019. Plasma Next shot. Increase nl_04 demand to 1.2e+20 020. Plasma Next shot. No pcs changes 021. Plasma. Injection at 0.76s Next shot No changes 022. Plasma Next shot. Increase nl_04 demand to 1.3e+20 023. Plasma. Next shot. No pcs changes 024. Plasma Next shot. No pcs changes 025. Plasma Next shot. No pcs changes. 026. Plasma Next shot No pcs changes 027. Plasma Next shot. No pcs changes 028. Plasma Next shot. nl_04 = 1.0e+20 029. Plasma Next shot. No pcs changes 030. Plasma. |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Dec 18 2003 09:41:52:630AM | 1031218001 | Dmitri Mossessian | Multiple H-modes - RF trips a lot. nl=9.3e19 Next shot: increase target nl to 1.1e20, ask for 2 levels of RF - 4 MW from 0.6 to 1 sec, 5 MW from 1 to 1.5 sec Also increase right gap by 2 mm for better RF coupling. |
| Dec 18 2003 09:45:37:227AM | 1031218002 | Dmitri Mossessian | Multiple H-modes again. QC mode is seen on PCI, but radiation kills H-modes - no steady state EDA. Next shot - try to incraese nl more. |
| Dec 18 2003 09:56:05:857AM | 1031218003 | Dmitri Mossessian | J-port did not work. RF levels are 2 and 2.5 MW. In both phases strong QC mode on PCI, but the second segment (2.5 MW) is interrupted by bursts of ELMs (type III ?). Radiation is our main problem. Next shot - try to move lower x-point out va little to decrease delta to 0.53 and move strike point onto the vertical plate |
| Dec 18 2003 10:31:31:010AM | 1031218004 | Dmitri Mossessian | Rf is better but trips a lot. Got EDAs, but radiation kills it quick, destroying QC mode into type III. Next shot - repeat with better RF |
| Dec 18 2003 10:31:44:790AM | 1031218005 | Dmitri Mossessian | Fizzle. |
| Dec 18 2003 10:39:48:153AM | 1031218006 | Dmitri Mossessian | RF is bad again. Also P_rad is so high that Te_ped is only about 300 eV at 5 MW. QC mode is again killed by radiation. Next shot - ECED between shots for 10 min. |
| Dec 18 2003 11:05:33:787AM | 1031218007 | Dmitri Mossessian | ECDC seems to make things a little better - we got somewhat longer EDAs, but the radiation is still very high and, although we are going from 4 to 5 MW, Te_ped falls and QC mode deteriorates into type III ELMs. Next shot - keep doing ECDC. Tune RF to get steadyer 5 MW level. |
| Dec 18 2003 12:24:43:507PM | 1031218009 | Dmitri Mossessian | Similar to 8. Next shot - reduce upper triangularity to 0.35 |
| Dec 18 2003 12:19:28:817PM | 1031218010 | Dmitri Mossessian | Smaller upper delta (0.37) makes weeker QC mode. But generally, the situation is the same as on previous shots - radiation is too high and H-modes are too short with very low pedestal temperature. Next shot - lower RF power (3 MW and 4 MW instead of 4 and 5) |
| Dec 18 2003 12:49:07:813PM | 1031218011 | Dmitri Mossessian | Same thing. Next shot - raise q by going to 0.9 MA, decrease left gap to 1 cm. |
| Dec 18 2003 01:06:21:977PM | 1031218012 | Dmitri Mossessian | Higher q makes H-mode more EDA-like. But w is down to 100 kJ and pedestal density is down to 1.5e20. Next shot - raise target nl to 1.2 e20 to get higher pedestal |
| Dec 18 2003 01:12:02:743PM | 1031218013 | Dmitri Mossessian | Good steady EDA, but with low W (90 kJ) and very low pedestal density (1.2e20) and temperature (300 eV) Next - try to get more RF |
| Dec 18 2003 01:26:07:623PM | 1031218014 | Dmitri Mossessian | Good steady EDA, as on shot 13. RF is still bad Next shot - try to improve Rf |
| Dec 18 2003 01:43:57:223PM | 1031218015 | Dmitri Mossessian | Good steady EDA, as on shot 14. RF is still bad Next shot - change shape (delta_u 0.37 -> 0.3, delta_l 0.5 -> 0.55) to change RF coupling |
| Dec 18 2003 01:56:48:073PM | 1031218016 | Dmitri Mossessian | J port did not run because of high pressure. D and E are OK, making EDA at 2 MW Next - reduce target 1.1e20 to make it easier for J |
| Dec 18 2003 02:06:44:700PM | 1031218017 | Dmitri Mossessian | Power is back up. The EDa is better than previous shot, W=100 kJ, Te_ped = 400 eV with 3 MW, but 300 eV at 4 MW ! Next shot - go back to 1 MA leaving everything else as is. |
| Dec 18 2003 02:50:02:233PM | 1031218020 | Dmitri Mossessian | Two H-modes, the first is more ELM-free, the second is steady EDA but with lower Te_ped, although RF is higher. Next - 4 MW of RF from the beginning. |
| Dec 18 2003 03:01:41:753PM | 1031218021 | Dmitri Mossessian | First H-mode is steady state but is terminated by a large injection. Second has lower Te_ped as usual. Next shot - repeat |
| Dec 18 2003 03:19:10:200PM | 1031218022 | Dmitri Mossessian | In first H-mode P_rad is rising linearly and destroys H-mode while density is almost constant. It means that the radiation comes from high Z impurities in EDA H-mode. Second H-mode has lower Te_ped as usual. Next shot - increase target nl to 1.3e20 |
| Dec 18 2003 03:29:53:013PM | 1031218023 | Dmitri Mossessian | Steady state EDA for the duration of RF (4 MW). Confinement is bad - W=125 kJ Next shot - higher RF power |
| Dec 18 2003 04:23:54:067PM | 1031218024 | Dmitri Mossessian | Long steady EDA with 5.5 MW RF, W=134 kJ Next shot - more power |
| Dec 18 2003 04:24:28:880PM | 1031218025 | Dmitri Mossessian | Long steady EDA with 6.2 MW RF, W=150 kJ Next shot - turn J port antenna off |
| Dec 18 2003 04:25:57:520PM | 1031218026 | Dmitri Mossessian | Long steady EDA with 3.2 MW RF, W=121 kJ - only 30 kJ lower than with additional 2 MW from J Next shot - turn D and E on for short period and then leave only J port on |
| Dec 23 2003 03:01:56:837PM | 1031218027 | Dmitri Mossessian | J port did not work at all, but we got long H-mode with type III ELMs on Ohmic power only Next shot - try to repeat with longer period of D and E to make J running |
| Dec 18 2003 04:53:40:140PM | 1031218028 | Dmitri Mossessian | J port does not wotk at this target density. Next shot - lower target nl to 1e20. Run only D and E at 3 MW |
| Dec 18 2003 04:54:19:390PM | 1031218029 | Dmitri Mossessian | Short H-mode with rising P_rad. W=118 kJ at 2.8 MW from D and E only |
| Dec 18 2003 05:02:02:957PM | 1031218030 | Dmitri Mossessian | Trying the same thing with J port only. J port worked for 100 msec only 100 msec, but confinement is comparable to previous shot with D and E. |
| Dec 18 2003 09:04:30:633AM | 1031218033 | Dmitri Mossessian | Run plan for 1031218, MP 304 H-mode regimes We will try to explore ELMy boundaries depending on triangularity and q. We should start with a single null shot (one from 1031217) with target nl=1.2e20, Ip=1 MA, upper delta=0.3, lower delta=0.5, and max RF power (6 MW ?) establishing high performance discharge. When we get beta_norm above 1.3 (and hopefully see ELMs) we will do the RF power scan (two or three levels of RF power in one shot) establishing the power boundary between ELMs and EDA. The scan should be repeated for different values of delta and current. We will use three values for upper delta (0.2, 0.4 and 0.7) and two values for lower delta (0.5 and 0.7) at three plasma currents (0.7 MA, 1 MA and 1.2 MA) First shot is 1031217019 - the best EDA from yesterday with delta_u=0.48, delta_l=0.6, 1 MA, nl=1e20 |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Dec 18 2003 07:49:02:917AM | Bill Rowan | Engineering setup for Thursday, December 18, 2003 MP# 304 --- H-Mode Regimes Session leader : Mossessian Physics operator: Rowan ECDC overnight in He at 9e-5 Torr, stopping at 7 AM Bake at 60 C overnight Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 17:00. Power systems the same as on 1031217019. A-coils should be hooked up as on 1031204021 and the power supply should be enabled. Gas setup: fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar Hybrid enabled (PG1) leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) fill C-side with 30 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3) Enable gatevalves (there will be no vacuum problems): ECE, VUV, DNB ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RF Setup: All 4 transmitters in Run On by 08:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Run plan for 1031218, MP 304 H-mode regimes We will try to explore ELMy boundaries depending on triangularity and q. We should start with a single null shot (one from 1031217) with target nl=1.2e20, Ip=1 MA, upper delta=0.3, lower delta=0.5, and max RF power (6 MW ?) establishing high performance discharge. When we get beta_norm above 1.3 (and hopefully see ELMs) we will do the RF power scan (two or three levels of RF power in one shot) establishing the power boundary between ELMs and EDA. The scan should be repeated for different values of delta and current. We will use three values for upper delta (0.2, 0.4 and 0.7) and two values for lower delta (0.5 and 0.7) at three plasma currents (0.7 MA, 1 MA and 1.2 MA) Overnight ECDC in helium. ECDC off at 7am | |
| Dec 18 2003 09:12:58:777AM | 1031218001 | Bill Rowan | 001. Plasma. |
| Dec 18 2003 09:20:50:230AM | 1031218001 | Bill Rowan | Next shot. nl_04 to 1.1e+20 Increase the outer gap by 2 mm (reduce RCUR by 1 mm) |
| Dec 18 2003 09:29:15:343AM | 1031218002 | Bill Rowan | 002. Plasma nl_04 = 1.0e+20 outer gap approx 1 cm |
| Dec 18 2003 09:37:10:910AM | 1031218002 | Bill Rowan | Next shot. nl_04 = 1.2e+20 |
| Dec 18 2003 09:42:37:553AM | 1031218003 | Bill Rowan | 003. Plasma nl_04 = 1.2e+20 just before the RF |
| Dec 18 2003 09:56:01:167AM | 1031218003 | Bill Rowan | Next shot. Move rxl out by 1 cm. |
| Dec 18 2003 10:05:13:907AM | 1031218004 | Bill Rowan | 004. lower triangularity is 0.53 shot 003 was approx 0.6 Next shot Repeat to improve RF |
| Dec 18 2003 10:30:40:057AM | 1031218005 | Bill Rowan | 005. Fizzle Next shot. Reduced the prefill from 25 ms to 20 ms. |
| Dec 18 2003 10:38:50:870AM | 1031218006 | Bill Rowan | 006. Plasma Next shot. ECDC in D2 |
| Dec 18 2003 11:00:42:100AM | 1031218007 | Bill Rowan | 007. Plasma. Next shot. ECDC in D2 for 10 minutes |
| Dec 18 2003 11:24:08:810AM | 1031218008 | Bill Rowan | 008. Plasma |
| Dec 18 2003 11:29:24:170AM | 1031218008 | Bill Rowan | Next shot, ECDC in D2 for 10 minutes. Reduce the nl_04 demand to 1.1e+20 |
| Dec 18 2003 11:55:42:290AM | 1031218009 | Bill Rowan | Reduce the nl_04 demand to 1.0e+20 |
| Dec 18 2003 12:47:51:920PM | 1031218011 | Bill Rowan | 011. Plasma Next shot: Decrease the plasma current to 0.9 MA Decrease the inner gap by 1 cm. |
| Dec 18 2003 01:00:14:097PM | 1031218012 | Bill Rowan | 012. Plasma Inner gap is 1 cm. Ip is 0.9 MA Next shot. Increase the target nl_04 to 1.2e+20 |
| Dec 18 2003 01:09:49:553PM | 1031218013 | Bill Rowan | 013. Plasma Next shot. No PCS changes. |
| Dec 18 2003 01:26:12:013PM | 1031218014 | Bill Rowan | 014. Plasma. Next shot. No PCS changes |
| Dec 18 2003 01:45:00:880PM | 1031218015 | Bill Rowan | 015. Plasma Next shot. Decrease RXL by 0.5 cm Increase RXU by 1 cm |
| Dec 18 2003 01:55:16:197PM | 1031218016 | Bill Rowan | 016. Plasma upper triangularity = 0.318 lower triangularity = 0.53 Next shot. nl_04 demand = 1.1e+20 |
| Dec 18 2003 02:07:12:560PM | 1031218017 | Bill Rowan | 017. Plasma nl_04 = 1.1e+20 Next shot. Increase IP to 1 MA |
| Dec 18 2003 02:32:54:023PM | 1031218018 | Bill Rowan | 018. Plasma Next shot. No successful PCS changes |
| Dec 18 2003 03:02:46:440PM | 1031218019 | Bill Rowan | 019. Plasma Next shot. Increase nl_04 demand to 1.2e+20 |
| Dec 18 2003 02:49:20:860PM | 1031218020 | Bill Rowan | 020. Plasma Next shot. No pcs changes |
| Dec 18 2003 03:01:31:143PM | 1031218021 | Bill Rowan | 021. Plasma. Injection at 0.76s Next shot No changes |
| Dec 18 2003 03:17:22:527PM | 1031218022 | Bill Rowan | 022. Plasma Next shot. Increase nl_04 demand to 1.3e+20 |
| Dec 18 2003 03:28:57:670PM | 1031218023 | Bill Rowan | 023. Plasma. Next shot. No pcs changes |
| Dec 18 2003 03:42:24:940PM | 1031218024 | Bill Rowan | 024. Plasma |
| Dec 18 2003 03:44:33:490PM | 1031218024 | Bill Rowan | 024. Plasma Next shot. No pcs changes |
| Dec 18 2003 04:06:10:933PM | 1031218025 | Bill Rowan | 025. Plasma Next shot. No pcs changes. |
| Dec 18 2003 04:06:57:170PM | 1031218026 | Bill Rowan | 026. Plasma Next shot No pcs changes |
| Dec 18 2003 04:23:30:410PM | 1031218027 | Bill Rowan | 027. Plasma Next shot. No pcs changes |
| Dec 18 2003 04:29:40:850PM | 1031218028 | Bill Rowan | 028. Plasma Next shot. nl_04 = 1.0e+20 |
| Dec 18 2003 04:47:31:840PM | 1031218029 | Bill Rowan | 029. Plasma Next shot. No pcs changes |
| Dec 18 2003 04:55:30:720PM | 1031218030 | Bill Rowan | 030. Plasma. Last shot. |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 09:10:26:137AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 2 | 09:23:20:403AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 09:38:03:927AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 09:59:57:480AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 10:13:06:313AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 10:31:17:883AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 10:56:35:080AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 11:21:37:653AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 11:47:49:570AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 12:12:47:330PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 12:37:29:543PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 12:51:33:970PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 01:04:47:770PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 01:17:28:510PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 01:35:45:237PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 01:48:26:053PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 02:01:12:073PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 02:13:44:063PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 02:26:37:193PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 02:43:10:497PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 02:55:33:907PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 03:08:21:333PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 03:21:32:463PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 03:34:31:797PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 03:47:12:223PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 04:00:00:620PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 04:12:39:830PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 04:26:19:817PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 04:39:47:430PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 30 | 04:52:35:170PM | Plasma | Ok | |