| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Brian Labombard |
| Physics operator(s): | Steve Wolfe |
| Engineering operator(s): | Unknown |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| MP#384 Experiments on Plasma Flows and the L-H Threshold |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:02:790PM |
| Author: Brian Labombard |
| Run Summary for 1040213 MP#384 - Experiments on Plasma Flows and the L-H Threshold: low density discharges, limited versus diverted topologies and the role of neutrals Physics Operator: S. Wolfe Session Leader: B. LaBombard ______________________________________________________________________________ Purpose: The purpose is to explore relationships between edge plasma flows, magnetic topologies, and the L-H power threshold. In particular, these experiments will focus on three topics which may help identify controlling physics: (1) influence of magnetic topology (upper- versus lower-null) in low density discharges, (2) limited versus diverted topologies, and (3) neutral charge-exchange collisions as a mechanism for flow momentum transfer between the scrape-off layer and the confined plasma. Shot Plan: All shots are 0.8MA, 5.7 tesla discharges. (Note: we want 5.7 tesla to place FRCECE channels near edge.) A. L-H thresholds in LSN/USN with NL04 = 0.6x1020 m-2 Load from shot#1031118018: LSN with NL04 = 0.7x1020 m-2 Set density program to NL04 = 0.6x1020 m-2 Set TF programming to 5.7 tesla. Notes on shot#1031118018: Segment 2 - single null lower Segment 3 - single null upper Segment 4 - double null Set probe scan times to 0.7 and 0.9 seconds. Program RF power ramp of 2 to 4 MW over time interval 0.95 to 1.5 sec. Shot#1-3: Optimize probe insertions. Determine L-H threshold power for LSN Load segment#3 from shot#1031118007: USN with NL04 = 0.65x1020 m-2 Set density program to NL04 = 0.6x1020 m-2 Set TF programming to 5.7 tesla. Shot#4-6: Optimize probe insertions. Determine L-H threshold power for USN Is the difference in USM/LSN power thresholds at this density significantly less than 2 MW (the difference value seen at NL04 = 0.9x1020 m-2)? B. Effect of inner wall gas puff on SOL/core momentum coupling Go back to LSN discharge (by turning on segment 2) Program for no RF power Fill NINJA plenum to 40 PSI deuterium Trigger capillary B16-001 to puff at 0.9 s for duration of 0.2 s Set probe scan times to 0.7, 0.9, and 1.1 seconds Shot#7-9: Vary gas-puff timing relative to probe scan time Change capillary to A/B Limiter, puffing at 0.9 s for duration of 0.2 s Shot#10-12: Vary gas-puff timing relative to probe scan time Compare flows near separatrix in Shot#7-9 with these baseline shots C. Effect of inner divertor nose recycling on SOL/core momentum coupling Refill NINJA plenum with helium (for CHROMEX) Set probe scan times to 0.7 and 0.9 seconds. Program RF power ramp of 2 to 4 MW over time interval 0.95 to 1.5 sec. Program lower x-point position to place LCFS close to but not touching inner divertor nose Shot#13-15: Vary distance between LCFS and inner divertor nose Look for differences in core rotation and L-H threshold power, compared to shots#1-3 above D. L-H Thresholds in Lower Limited versus Lower Diverted Discharges Reload a LSN shot from part B above Change density programming to NL04 = 0.9x1020 m-2 Program RF power ramp of 0 to 2 MW over time interval 0.95 to 1.5 sec. Shot#16-19: Determine L-H threshold power for LSN at this density Program lower x-point position to limit discharge on inner divertor nose Shot#20-25: Vary x-point location. Measure flows, determine L-H threshold powers. ______________________________________________________________________________ Result: It was a rough day at the office with assorted computer delays, a hybrid computer panic, and a liberal sprinkling of duds. But we did manage to force our way through a good chunk of the experimental plan. We also learned a few things. Part A At a density around NL04=0.6e20 the LSN L-H transition occurred at an RF power of about 1.1 MW (shots 4,5). This value is similar to that found earlier for NL04 near 0.9e20. Earlier experiments also noted that at the lower densities (NL04=0.6e20) the toroidal plasma rotation in the core (HIREX) and low field-side SOL plasma rotation near the separatrix (ASP, FSP) show only a weak dependence on USN/LSN topology. So the question to address today was: "Is the difference in USN/LSN power thresholds at this density correspondingly less than 2 MW (the difference value seen at NL04 = 0.9e20 m-2)?" The USN shots 6, 8, and 9 were our best attempts at addressing this question. Unfortunately, outgassing during RF (plus perhaps NINJA He puff) resulted in the plasma density rising above the target value (0.68e20 and 0.79e20 on shots 8 and 9) and clouded the result. Nevertheless, no L-H transition was seen for RF powers up to 2.2MW (shot 8) and 3 MW (shot 9). So it appears that the answer is a qualified NO - the L-H threshold power difference between USN/LSN is not significantly reduced in the lower density discharges. If there does exist a reduced difference in USN/LSN threshold powers at NL04=0.6e20, it is subtle and would require some careful tweaking of the target density and getting some cleaner high RF power ramps. It should be noted that the SOL flows on the high field (ISP) still show a dramatic dependence on USN/LSN topology (counter/co-current) at the lower density. So, were we just thinking about this wrong? Is it the ever-present high field SOL flows that matter most with regard to the affecting the USN/LSN threshold powers? - and the coupling of this flow momentum to the confined plasma merely a secondary effect? Part B LSN shots 15-19 were strong NINJA D2 gas puffs from the inner wall (15,16,18) and outer A-B limiter (17,19). The idea was to look for systematic differences in the toroidal plasma rotation at the separatrix (ASP,FSP) and in the core (HIREX) in response to the gas puff. The puff time was varied relative to probe scan times, in the hopes of catching a transient toroidal spin-up (or down). No dramatic changes in HIREX rotation or raw probe data traces were immediately evident - although it is difficult to subtract by eye the effect of the NINJA-induced density rise on the HIREX rotation changes. A more detailed analysis, particularly of the probe data, will need to be performed. Yet it appears that only subtle effects (if any) will come out of it. Part C Shots 21,22,24,25,27,28 were dedicated to looking at the effect of varying the gap between the inner divertor nose and separatrix on the L-H power threshold and plasma rotation. Shots 21,22,24,27 had small gap while shots 3,4,5,25,28 had normal gap. Ideally, we wanted to compare identical LSN discharges except with the gaps small/large. But, once again, we were plagued with varying target plasma densities which (we suspect) introduced variability in the L-H power thresholds. For NL04 around 0.5e20, it appears that we were flirting with the so-called "low density limit" to L-H access (another mystery in itself to be solved). Yet, the data does suggest that for small inner divertor nose gaps, the L-H power threshold may be lower. Consider the shots: Normal Gap Shot NL04 (1e20m^-2) Prf-threshold (MW) 3 0.71 1.2 4 0.6 1.1 5 0.58 1.1 25 0.5 no H-mode for Prf up to 1.4 28 0.59 no H-mode for Prf up to 1.5 Reduced Gap 21 0.9 0.85 22 0.63 0.75 24 0.58 0.76 27 0.5 no H-mode for Prf up to 1.2 Based on shots 5 and 24, the L-H threshold power appears to be reduced. But in light of the variability, these discharges need to be revisited. A comparison of corresponding toroidal flow data (HIREX and probes) should be interesting. Part D We did not get to Part D. This will have to wait for another run, but not on Friday the 13th please! Important Other Result It should be noted that in USN shot 11, the density feedback died and we got a very low density shot (NL04 =0.2e20 prior to RF). In response, HIREX recorded a very strong CO-current rotation in the ohmic phase!!. The ASP and FSP probes also recorded a very bizarre POSITIVE floating potential near the separatrix of over 100 volts! This implies a very strong POSITIVE Er near the separatrix which is consistent with the co-current HIREX rotation. (We also have probe flow data, but haven't looked at it yet.) No H-mode was seen for Prf up to 3.9 MW!!! So clearly something important is going on in these low density discharges which needs to be explored - a mini-proposal dedicated to poking at this low density regime is obviously in our future. ______________________________________________________________________________ Detailed Shot log: 1 - Hybrid problem? - long delay 2 - SNL, no probes scanning 3 - SNL, NL04 =0.6 to 0.71 - ASP(+9), FSP(-4), ISP => H-mode at RF turn-on 1.2 MW (NL04=0.71) 4 - SNL, NL04 =0.54 to 0.6 and rising during RF. - ASP(+9), FSP(-4), ISP => H-mode at Prf = 1.1 MW 5 - SNL, NL04 =0.52 to 0.58 and rising during RF. - ASP(+11, too deep on first scan), FSP(-3, ok), ISP => H-mode at Prf = 1.1 MW 6 - SNU, NL04 =0.53 to 0.58 and rising during RF. ASP(+8.5), FSP(+8.5), ISP => No H-mode at 1.5 PRF. Also core rotation does not change with RF power at this level 7 - early disruption 8 - SNU, NL04 =0.55 and jumps up during RF (0.68 and rising). ASP(+8.5), FSP(+8.5), ISP => No H-mode at 2.2 PRF. Core rotation is now responding To RF power. 9 - SNU, NL04 =0.61 and jumps up during RF (0.79) ASP(+8.2), FSP(+8.5), ISP - nice data = No H-mode at 3 MW PRF. ...long delay - computer problems 10- Early disruption. DAC mixes up shot 9 and 10 traces and labels them as shot 10! 11- SNU, NL04 =0.2 prior to RF! (0.4 during RF) lost gas feedback. ASP(+8.2), FSP(+8.5), ISP - nice data => No H-mode at 3.9 MW PRF => ASP and FSP see POSITIVE 100 volts floating potential! John also sees rotation go co-current as density drops. 12- SNU, NL04 ramping! probe scans at NL04=1.0 and 1.2. lost gas feedback. 1.0 MW PRF. ASP(+8.2), FSP(+8.5), ISP - nice data 13- early disruption 14- dud 15- SNL, NL04=0.56 jumps to 1.10 NINJA: D2 0.72 trig, 0.15 duration, B16-001 ASP(+10), FSP(-3), ISP 16- SNL, NL04=0.68 jumps to 1.13 NINJA: D2 0.805 trig, 0.15 duration, B16-001 ASP(+10), FSP(-3), ISP 17- SNL, NL04=0.75 jumps to 1.13 NINJA: D2 0.805 trig, 0.15 duration, AB-Lim ASP(+10), FSP(-3), ISP 18- SNL, NL04=0.66 jumps to 1.13 NINJA: D2 0.78 trig, 0.15 duration, B16-001 ASP(+10), FSP(-3), ISP 19- SNL, NL04=0.67 jumps to 1.12 NINJA: D2 0.78 trig, 0.15 duration, AB-Lim ASP(+10), FSP(-3), ISP 20 - fizzle 21- SNL, small inner divertor nose gap. NL04=0.73 ramping to 1.0 ASP(+10), FSP(-3, far out), ISP => dithering H-alpha at 0.85 MW Prf level (NL04=0.9) 22- SNL, small inner divertor nose gap. NL04=0.63 and flat ASP(+10), FSP(+6, 2 mm out), ISP => H-mode at Prf = 0.70 MW 23- dud 24- SNL, small inner divertor nose gap. NL04=0.58 and flat ASP(+10), FSP(+8), ISP => H-mode at Prf = 0.76 MW 25- SNL, normal inner divertor nose gap. NL04=0.5 and flat ASP(+10), FSP(-3), ISP => no H-mode for Prf up to 1.4 MW 26 -dud 27- SNL, small inner divertor nose gap. NL04=0.5 and flat ASP(+10), FSP(+8), ISP => no H-mode for Prf up to 1.2 MW 28- SNL, normal inner divertor nose gap. NL04=0.59 and flat ASP(+10), FSP(-3), ISP => no H-mode for Prf up to 1.5 MW |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:36:48:990PM |
| Author: Steve Wolfe |
| Physics Summary for Friday 13-Feb-2004 MP#384 Experiments on Plasma Flows and the L-H Threshold Piggyback MP#389 CNPA - V. Tang SL: LaBombard PO: wolfe EO: Cochran,Byford,Parkin (the Bills) Engineering Setup ----------------- ECDC Overnight in D2, stopping by 07:00 Run Begins at 09:00 and ends at 17:00 Power Systems as on 1031118018, except TF current limit to 170kA Gas System Setup: fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar Hybrid enabled (PG1) leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) fill C-side with 30 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3) fill NINJA (lower cap) with 6psi He Gate valve permissives for the usual suspectsd (ECE,VUV,DNB) assuming no vacuum problems RF: Transmitters #1,2,3 and 4 in RUN-ON by 08:00 RF program ramp from 2MW to 4MW over interval 0.95 to 1.5sec; loading similar to 1031118007. Run Plan --------- Purpose: The purpose is to explore relationships between edge plasma flows, magnetic topologies, and the L-H power threshold. In particular, these experiments will focus on three topics which may help identify controlling physics: (1) influence of magnetic topology (upper- versus lower-null) in low density discharges, (2) limited versus diverted topologies, and (3) neutral charge-exchange collisions as a mechanism for flow momentum transfer between the scrape-off layer and the confined plasma. Shot Plan: All shots are 0.8MA, 5.7 tesla discharges. (Note: we want 5.7 tesla to place FRCECE channels near edge.) A. L-H thresholds in LSN/USN with NL04 = 0.6x1020 m-2 Load from shot#1031118018: LSN with NL04 = 0.7x1020 m-2 Set density program to NL04 = 0.6x1020 m-2 Set TF programming to 5.7 tesla. Notes on shot#1031118018: Segment 2 - single null lower Segment 3 - single null upper Segment 4 - double null Set probe scan times to 0.7 and 0.9 seconds. Program RF power ramp of 2 to 4 MW over time interval 0.95 to 1.5 sec. Shot#1-3: Optimize probe insertions. Determine L-H threshold power for LSN Load segment#3 from shot#1031118007: USN with NL04 = 0.65x1020 m-2 Set density program to NL04 = 0.6x1020 m-2 Set TF programming to 5.7 tesla. Shot#4-6: Optimize probe insertions. Determine L-H threshold power for USN Is the difference in USM/LSN power thresholds at this density significantly less than 2 MW (the difference value seen at NL04 = 0.9x1020 m-2)? B. Effect of inner wall gas puff on SOL/core momentum coupling Go back to LSN discharge (by turning on segment 2) Program for no RF power Fill NINJA plenum to 40 PSI deuterium Trigger capillary B16-001 to puff at 0.9 s for duration of 0.2 s Set probe scan times to 0.7, 0.9, and 1.1 seconds Shot#7-9: Vary gas-puff timing relative to probe scan time Change capillary to A/B Limiter, puffing at 0.9 s for duration of 0.2 s Shot#10-12: Vary gas-puff timing relative to probe scan time Compare flows near separatrix in Shot#7-9 with these baseline shots C. Effect of inner divertor nose recycling on SOL/core momentum coupling Refill NINJA plenum with helium (for CHROMEX) Set probe scan times to 0.7 and 0.9 seconds. Program RF power ramp of 2 to 4 MW over time interval 0.95 to 1.5 sec. Program lower x-point position to place LCFS close to but not touching inner divertor nose Shot#13-15: Vary distance between LCFS and inner divertor nose Look for differences in core rotation and L-H threshold power, compared to shots#1-3 above D. L-H Thresholds in Lower Limited versus Lower Diverted Discharges Reload a LSN shot from part B above Change density programming to NL04 = 0.9x1020 m-2 Program RF power ramp of 0 to 2 MW over time interval 0.95 to 1.5 sec. Shot#16-19: Determine L-H threshold power for LSN at this density Program lower x-point position to limit discharge on inner divertor nose Shot#20-25: Vary x-point location. Measure flows, determine L-H threshold powers. Results: ---------- A difficult day; Friday the 13th definitely came on a Friday this month. We got through parts A and B of the plan; we also had a number of shots on part C, but without conclusive results. See the Session Leader's report for an evaluation. Vincent got signals from the CNPA when the beam and RF were both on before the L-H transition. Problems included numerous computer hangs and crashes, a mystery hybrid malfunction, tci feedback failures, extra density from NINJA puffs and RF, and duds and fizzles later in the day. There were also problems with J-port later in the day, which didn't really impact the run because that part was done with lower power requested. On the first shot, the hybrid seemed to have a problem which caused the ZCUR precictor to think the plasma was very high, which caused it to throw the plasma away early in segment 1. The outputs looked like there was a bad DAC card, with seriously wrong AOUT values on wire 2&3 (ZCUR), and possibly less wrong values on 1 and 4 during the pre-charge. All the inputs looked good, on the magnetics, hybrid camac and lowbrid. DPCS AOUT's looked normal, indicating a hybrid malfunction. After a couple of reload/coldstarts, a trip to the interface room to reseat the input connectors, a lot of head scratching and a couple of computer crashes, we took shot #2 around 10:30, and it was fine. Best guess is that somehow bad gains got loaded into the hybrid, although the initial load and coldstart looked normal. I've never seen this behavior before (and hope I never do again). The dpcs signals were useful in identifying this as a problem internal to the hybrid, although it still is not clear what the problem was. Alcserv4 (alcdaq) hung and/or crashed several times today. The last time Josh reseated the memory cards before rebooting. We also had a crash of daqa that may have been network-related. Note that after one alcserv4 hang, during INIT on shot#10, we ended up with some data from shot 9 stored as if from shot 10. The magnetics signals, including current, in the shot 10 tree are actually from shot 9. The actual shot 10 was a 0.5sec long disruptive discharge. As happened yesterday, there were a couple of duds and some slightly late breakdowns. I ended up with Br0=0 and IC_EF4=-1345, and pg4 at 20msec. The 10A more negative on EF4 may have helped, but there weren't enough shots to really tell. There were a number of disruptions that seemed to be related to random injections. Also, when we went to the part C discharges, with recycling off the nose, the outer strike point got onto or close to the EF1 pocket, and I think that was the cause of the disruptions on 21 and 27. Scorecard --------- Tests 0 Duds 3 Fizzles 1 <100msec 1 Hybrid error plasmas 23 (Includes 3 disruptions before 0.6sec) ------ -- shots 28 |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Feb 13 2004 08:55:32:563AM | Brian Labombard | MP#384 - Experiments on Plasma Flows and the L-H Threshold: low density discharges, limited versus diverted topologies and the role of neutrals Purpose: The purpose is to explore relationships between edge plasma flows, magnetic topologies, and the L-H power threshold. In particular, these experiments will focus on three topics which may help identify controlling physics: (1) influence of magnetic topology (upper- versus lower-null) in low density discharges, (2) limited versus diverted topologies, and (3) neutral charge-exchange collisions as a mechanism for flow momentum transfer between the scrape-off layer and the confined plasma. Shot Plan: All shots are 0.8MA, 5.7 tesla discharges. (Note: we want 5.7 tesla to place FRCECE channels near edge.) A. L-H thresholds in LSN/USN with NL04 = 0.6x1020 m-2 Load from shot#1031118018: LSN with NL04 = 0.7x1020 m-2 Set density program to NL04 = 0.6x1020 m-2 Set TF programming to 5.7 tesla. Notes on shot#1031118018: Segment 2 - single null lower Segment 3 - single null upper Segment 4 - double null Set probe scan times to 0.7 and 0.9 seconds. Program RF power ramp of 2 to 4 MW over time interval 0.95 to 1.5 sec. Shot#1-3: Optimize probe insertions. Determine L-H threshold power for LSN Load segment#3 from shot#1031118007: USN with NL04 = 0.65x1020 m-2 Set density program to NL04 = 0.6x1020 m-2 Set TF programming to 5.7 tesla. Shot#4-6: Optimize probe insertions. Determine L-H threshold power for USN Is the difference in USM/LSN power thresholds at this density significantly less than 2 MW (the difference value seen at NL04 = 0.9x1020 m-2)? B. Effect of inner wall gas puff on SOL/core momentum coupling Go back to LSN discharge (by turning on segment 2) Program for no RF power Fill NINJA plenum to 40 PSI deuterium Trigger capillary B16-001 to puff at 0.9 s for duration of 0.2 s Set probe scan times to 0.7, 0.9, and 1.1 seconds Shot#7-9: Vary gas-puff timing relative to probe scan time Change capillary to A/B Limiter, puffing at 0.9 s for duration of 0.2 s Shot#10-12: Vary gas-puff timing relative to probe scan time Compare flows near separatrix in Shot#7-9 with these baseline shots C. Effect of inner divertor nose recycling on SOL/core momentum coupling Refill NINJA plenum with helium (for CHROMEX) Set probe scan times to 0.7 and 0.9 seconds. Program RF power ramp of 2 to 4 MW over time interval 0.95 to 1.5 sec. Program lower x-point position to place LCFS close to but not touching inner divertor nose Shot#13-15: Vary distance between LCFS and inner divertor nose Look for differences in core rotation and L-H threshold power, compared to shots#1-3 above D. L-H Thresholds in Lower Limited versus Lower Diverted Discharges Reload a LSN shot from part B above Change density programming to NL04 = 0.9x1020 m-2 Program RF power ramp of 0 to 2 MW over time interval 0.95 to 1.5 sec. Shot#16-19: Determine L-H threshold power for LSN at this density Program lower x-point position to limit discharge on inner divertor nose Shot#20-25: Vary x-point location. Measure flows, determine L-H threshold powers. | |
| Feb 13 2004 10:45:11:723AM | 1040213002 | Brian Labombard | Shot 2- probes not scanning NL04 0.7 Next shot: lower density, scan probes |
| Feb 13 2004 11:03:45:967AM | 1040213003 | Brian Labombard | Shot 3 - ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9 seconds NL04 at 0.6 H-mode at 0.95 seconds at RF turn on |
| Feb 13 2004 11:17:35:853AM | 1040213004 | Brian Labombard | Shot 4 - ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9 seconds NL04 at 0.55 and rising. H-mode at 1.1 MW RF ISP - ok ASP - could be deeper FSP - could be deeper |
| Feb 13 2004 11:28:35:490AM | 1040213005 | Brian Labombard | Shot 5 - ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9 seconds NL04 at 0.55 and rising. again H-mode at 1.1 MW RF ISP - ok ASP - too deep on first scan FSP - good |
| Feb 13 2004 11:50:55:467AM | 1040213006 | Brian Labombard | Shot 6 - USN ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9 seconds NL04 at 0.55 and rising. No H-mode with 1.5 MW RF Toroidal rotation did not change at all with RF power at this level ISP - ok ASP - ok FSP - ok |
| Feb 13 2004 12:58:53:517PM | 1040213009 | Brian Labombard | Shot 9 - USN ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9 seconds NL04 at 0.55 and rising. No H-mode with 3.0 MW RF ISP - ok ASP - ok FSP - ok |
| Feb 13 2004 01:32:05:300PM | 1040213011 | Brian Labombard | Shot 11 - USN ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9 seconds NL04 at 0.3! No H-mode with 3.9 MW RF ISP - ok ASP - ok FSP - ok ASP and FSP see POSITIVE 100 volts floating potential on 0.9 s scan!! |
| Feb 13 2004 01:43:20:250PM | 1040213012 | Brian Labombard | Shot 12 - USN ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9 seconds NL04 ramp! 1 MW RF ISP - ok ASP - ok FSP - ok |
| Feb 13 2004 02:18:42:330PM | 1040213015 | Brian Labombard | Shot 15 - LSN, NINJA: D2 (1800 torr) 0.72 trig, 0.15 duration, B16-001 ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9, 1.1 seconds NL04 0.52, ramping up starting at 0.81 sec ISP - ok ASP - ok FSP - ok Next Shot: repeat, delay NINJA trigger to 0.805 sec |
| Feb 13 2004 02:30:51:137PM | 1040213016 | Brian Labombard | Shot 16 - LSN, NINJA: D2 (1800 torr) 0.805 trig, 0.15 duration, AB Lim ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9, 1.1 seconds NL04 0.52, ramping up starting at 0.89 sec ISP - ok ASP - ok FSP - ok Next Shot: repeat, puff from outer limiter |
| Feb 13 2004 02:43:57:273PM | 1040213017 | Brian Labombard | Shot 17 - LSN, NINJA: D2 (1800 torr) 0.805 trig, 0.15 duration, AB Lim ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9, 1.1 seconds NL04 0.71, ramping up starting at 0.91 sec ISP - ok ASP - ok FSP - ok Next Shot: repeat, puff from inner limiter, earlier by 0.025 s |
| Feb 13 2004 02:54:47:880PM | 1040213018 | Brian Labombard | Shot 18 - LSN, NINJA: D2 (1800 torr) 0.78 trig, 0.15 duration, B16-001 ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9, 1.1 seconds NL04 0.68, ramping up starting at .87 ISP - ok ASP - ok FSP - ok Next Shot: repeat, puff from outer limiter |
| Feb 13 2004 03:13:33:027PM | 1040213019 | Brian Labombard | Shot 19 - LSN, NINJA: D2 (1800 torr) 0.78 trig, 0.15 duration, AB Lim ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9, 1.1 seconds NL04 0.68, ramping up starting at .87 ISP - ok ASP - ok FSP - ok Next Shot: Go to small inner divertor nose gap |
| Feb 13 2004 04:09:31:880PM | 1040213021 | Brian Labombard | Shot 21 - LSN, small innder divertor nose gap ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9 seconds NL04 0.7 and rising ISP - ok ASP - ok FSP - ok, 7 mm out |
| Feb 13 2004 04:08:40:880PM | 1040213022 | Brian Labombard | Shot 22 - LSN, small inner divertor nose gap ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9 seconds NL04 0.6 flat target. H-mode at 0.8 MW PRF ISP - ok ASP - ok FSP - ok, 2 mm out |
| Feb 13 2004 04:29:37:560PM | 1040213024 | Brian Labombard | Shot 24 - LSN, small inner divertor nose gap ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9, 1.1 seconds NL04 0.55 flat target. H-mode at 0.75 MW PRF ISP - ok ASP - ok FSP - ok Next Shot: go back to normal gap (shot 19) |
| Feb 13 2004 04:37:08:340PM | 1040213025 | Brian Labombard | Shot 25 - LSN - normal inner divertor nose gap ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9, 1.1 seconds NL04 0.5 flat target. no H-mode up to 1.4 MW ISP - ok ASP - ok FSP - ok Next Shot: redo shot 24 |
| Feb 13 2004 05:14:46:110PM | 1040213027 | Brian Labombard | Shot 27 - LSN, small inner divertor nose gap ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9, 1.1 seconds NL04 0.49 flat target. no H-mode up to 1.2 MW ISP - ok ASP - ok FSP - ok |
| Feb 13 2004 05:26:18:320PM | 1040213028 | Brian Labombard | Shot 28 - LSN, normal inner divertor nose gap ASP, FSP, ISP scanning at 0.7, 0.9, 1.1 seconds NL04 0.59 flat target. no H-mode up to 1.4 MW ISP - ok ASP - ok FSP - ok |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Feb 12 2004 05:18:55:303PM | Steve Wolfe | Setting up PCS for run 1040213 load from 1031118018 load seg3 from 1031118007 load seg1 from 1040210030 In seg2 change tf from -150000 to -158000 copy to seg3 in seg2 change nl04 to 0.6e20 copy to seg3 build everything and touch up the stale wires. save as /home/wolfe/pcs_trees/pcs_1040213999 | |
| Feb 13 2004 07:07:46:267AM | Steve Wolfe | Load previously prepared shot from /home/wolfe/pcs_trees/pcs_1040213999 into model: Filling in configuration /12-NOV-2003 08:00:23.00/ Cleaning PCS tree in /home/wolfe/pcs_scratch about to ask alcdata to copy /home/wolfe/pcs_scratch/pcs_model to /cmod/trees/models/pcs/pcs_model Load at 13-Feb-2004 07:07:02.00 Open tree /home/wolfe/pcs_scratch -1 Open tree done | |
| Feb 13 2004 07:45:44:990AM | Steve Wolfe | There was a brief computer hang at about 07:44. All stations seemed to freeze for a minute, then woke up again. | |
| Feb 13 2004 07:52:34:980AM | Steve Wolfe | The logbook froze when I made the previous entry. Killed it and brought up a new one, which took a long time to appear See if it will accept this entry | |
| Feb 13 2004 09:32:37:360AM | 1040213001 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#1: Supposed to be SNL like 1031118018 except Bt=5.7,nl05=.60e20 fizzle? No it got 130kA then died vertically Looks like the chopper did something strange. There's a big offset on the zcur predictor, normally around -5000 at t=0, on shot 1 it is +5000 |
| Feb 13 2004 09:52:57:933AM | 1040213001 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#1: The lowbrid and hybrid disagree on the zcur value Looks like the hybrid is doing something strange. The zcur aoutputs seem to be wrong through the whole pre-charge, as if one input or more inputs are missing, or the coefficients are wrong. The zcur signals go to 1V at -.55sec Both of them do it, which could mean a missing input or a bad DAC in the A-matrix somewhere. |
| Feb 13 2004 10:13:58:347AM | 1040213001 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#1:Went in the hybrid room and made sure all the input cables are ok. It can't be that because I see all the camac signals, and they are bridge through the hybrid front panel, not teed. It may be a DAC or a bad gain. Hard to believe it's a gain since it's on two wires. Reload and do a new coldstart anyway. Tried to do a coldstart and it gave server connect errors! Tom restarted servers on daqa and did a coldstart. He says there were no errors. |
| Feb 13 2004 10:28:19:760AM | 1040213001 | Steve Wolfe | DAQA crashed. I'll do a new coldstart when it comes back up. rtnode -- data loaded, A matrix responds rtnode -- data loaded, M matrix responds rtnode -- data loaded, PID matrix responds RT_NODE Done Fri Feb 13 09:28:03 2004, Done \CMOD::TOP.HYBRID.HARDWARE.BITBUS:RT_NODE:EXEC_ACTION in CMOD shot -1, status=1 |
| Feb 13 2004 10:36:23:680AM | 1040213002 | Steve Wolfe | shot#2: Plasma. I have no idea what screwed up on first shot, but it's fixed now. nl4 is a little high. next shot: drop nl4 program to 5e19 |
| Feb 13 2004 10:51:10:283AM | 1040213003 | Steve Wolfe | shot#3: drop nl4 program to 5e19, and decrease pg3 seg2 maint level to 10V plasma, nl still a little high - NINJA is fueling some H-mode at 1.02sec, Prf~1.3MW next shot: turn seg2 pg3 off after .145sec |
| Feb 13 2004 11:08:53:420AM | 1040213004 | Steve Wolfe | shot#4: lower rf, drop pg3 V puff, plasma,hmode at 1.2sec density is coming up during the RF next shot: repeat for deep probe |
| Feb 13 2004 11:24:21:773AM | 1040213005 | Steve Wolfe | shot#5: repeat for deep probe plasma. next shot: upper null |
| Feb 13 2004 11:44:38:437AM | 1040213006 | Steve Wolfe | shot#6: go to upper null, seg2 off seg 3 on (after copying nl4 and gas ) plasma no h-mode, upper null. RF was still at lower power next shot: repeat |
| Feb 13 2004 12:31:20:123PM | 1040213007 | Steve Wolfe | shot#7:repeat with higher power disrupts at .39sec injection at .1, big injection near top of inner cyl before disruption. It's in crossover and just gointg diverted at that time next shot: increase current rise after .1sec, slow down clearin before .4, no change after .55 |
| Feb 13 2004 12:31:37:153PM | 1040213008 | Steve Wolfe | shot#8: increase current rise after .1sec, slow down clearin before .4, no change after .55 plasma, no hmode. J faulting, only got 2MW got rid of the injections, for this shot anyway. next shot: repeat for RF |
| Feb 13 2004 12:49:55:537PM | 1040213009 | Steve Wolfe | shot#9: repeat for RF plasma disrupts at 1.23, during the RF? Computer problem on rf traces. Scopes are blowing away, data not showing up. Alcdaq has been rebooted. Some data on 9 is lost. |
| Feb 13 2004 01:06:02:390PM | 1040213010 | Steve Wolfe | shot#10: repeat for RF NINJA is ready for part B (40psi D2), but will not pulse this shot. Hung up in init. Jas freed it up. Ugly early disruption at 0.5sec, Some traces are the same as shot9 Lots of runaways Current shot is still 9 according to the logbook and the big board |
| Feb 13 2004 01:09:16:357PM | 1040213010 | Steve Wolfe | shot#10: repeat for RF NINJA is ready for part B (40psi D2), but will not pulse this shot. Hung up in init. Jas freed it up. Ugly early disruption at 0.5sec, Some traces are the same as shot9 Lots of runaways Current shot is still 9 according to the logbook and the big board next shot: Get rid of zcur mismatch at 0.1sec |
| Feb 13 2004 02:08:53:163PM | 1040213011 | Steve Wolfe | shot#11: repeat for RF Get rid of zcur mismatch at 0.1sec plasma disrupted at 1.4sec, still no h-mode. looks like a locked mode at 1.03sec. Density is lower because the NINJA was off. next shot: turn up the density and increase the Acoil current |
| Feb 13 2004 02:09:27:100PM | 1040213012 | Steve Wolfe | shot#12: turn up the density to 6e19,and increase the Acoil current to 3500 (demand) set pg3 in seg3 to zero for whole time, no drop to negative. plasma to 1.7sec but this time tci feedback turned the valve on; last time it turned it off. next shot: go on to case B (LSN) no RF |
| Feb 13 2004 02:09:07:380PM | 1040213013 | Steve Wolfe | shot#13: go on to case B (LSN) no RF Seg3 off seg 2 on. disrupted at .36 Spark shower from (outer?) divertor next shot: repeat |
| Feb 13 2004 02:08:19:850PM | 1040213014 | Steve Wolfe | shot#14: go on to case B (LSN) no RF dud! next shot: raise the pre-puff |
| Feb 13 2004 02:12:00:897PM | 1040213015 | Steve Wolfe | shot#15: pg4 from 15 to 17msec plasma (finally!) NINJA hits at .8sec, raises nl4 from .55 to 1.05e20 next shot: repeat with different NINJA timing |
| Feb 13 2004 02:24:39:313PM | 1040213016 | Steve Wolfe | shot#16: repeat with different NINJA timing plasma NINJA comes in about 0.9sec next shot: repeat with outer puff |
| Feb 13 2004 02:40:36:993PM | 1040213017 | Steve Wolfe | shot#17: repeat with outer puff plasma - puff hits a little late Also, density has crept up, although gas is off. next shot: reduce pg3 in seg1 |
| Feb 13 2004 02:53:53:410PM | 1040213018 | Steve Wolfe | shot#18: reduce pg3 in seg1 plasma - Puff hits at .86 sec next shot: back to outer limiter puff |
| Feb 13 2004 03:05:46:797PM | 1040213019 | Steve Wolfe | shot#19: back to outer limiter puff reduce pg4 from 17->16msec plasma - puff hits around .88sec next shot: Done with B, on to C |
| Feb 13 2004 03:19:50:137PM | 1040213020 | Steve Wolfe | shot#20: Done with B, on to C decrease rxl by .02m from .6sec to 1.5sec fizzle next shot: drop pg4 again |
| Feb 13 2004 03:39:33:597PM | 1040213021 | Steve Wolfe | shot#21: drop pg4 from 16->15msec, br0 from .0002 to 0. plasma disrupts at 1.35sec density is rising during RF; NINJA was also on (He) next shot: raise zxl to try to keep outer strike off ef1 pocket |
| Feb 13 2004 04:00:12:980PM | 1040213023 | Steve Wolfe | shot#23: tweak current rise in seg2; change RF program dud next shot: raise pg4 back to 17msec |
| Feb 13 2004 04:17:25:613PM | 1040213024 | Steve Wolfe | shot#24: tweak current rise in seg2; change RF program raise pg4 back to 17msec plasma, hmode at 1.138sec next shot: load rxl,zxl from shot 5 |
| Feb 13 2004 04:29:11:577PM | 1040213025 | Steve Wolfe | shot#25:load rxl,zxl from shot 5 increase pg4 to 18msec plasma no hmode. rf is good, nl4 is down a smidge. next shot:go back to shot#24 |
| Feb 13 2004 04:42:53:180PM | 1040213026 | Steve Wolfe | shot#26:import seg2 from shot#24 (back to the nose) dud. next shot: decrease ic_ef4 by 10A, raise pg4 again. |
| Feb 13 2004 05:02:24:397PM | 1040213027 | Steve Wolfe | shot#27:import seg2 from shot#24 (back to the nose) ic_ef4 to -1345, pg4 to 20msec plasma disrupts at 1.43sec, no hmode next shot: raise nl4 to 6e19, rxl,zxl from 25 |
| Feb 13 2004 05:08:53:730PM | 1040213028 | Steve Wolfe | shot#28: raise nl4 to 6e19, rxl,zxl from 25 plasma no hmode density right on 6e19 until 1.2sec, then drops. END OF RUN |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 08:57:53:203AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 2 | 10:29:55:700AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 10:44:47:380AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 11:00:14:157AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 11:15:07:243AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 11:28:35:647AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 11:42:41:593AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 11:57:57:197AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 12:11:07:347PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 01:11:27:887PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 01:26:12:727PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 01:42:18:453PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 01:54:55:027PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 02:07:24:350PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 02:20:07:127PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 02:33:33:013PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 02:47:01:180PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 03:00:51:907PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 03:16:52:480PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 03:29:32:083PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 03:43:14:360PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 03:57:05:590PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 04:10:00:490PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 04:23:52:017PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 04:37:07:950PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 04:52:46:043PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 05:05:18:087PM | Plasma | Ok | |