Alcator C-Mod Run 1050317 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:414
Date Filed: 2/23/2005
Title:Divertor conditioning with Li pellets in near double-null discharges
First Author:Earl Marmar
Session Leader:Earl Marmar (shots 1-28)

Operators
Session leader(s):Earl Marmar
Physics operator(s):Steve Wolfe
Engineering operator(s):Bill Cochran,Gary Dekow,Bill Parkin

Engineering Operator Run Comment
MP#414 Divertor Conditioning with Li pellets in near-DN discharges

Session Leader Plans
Entered: Mar 17 2005 08:35:49:577AM
Author: Earl Marmar
MP 414 Li pellet wall conditioning in double null

Previous experience with the use of lithium for wall conditioning in tokamaks has been
mixed. On TFTR, dramatic reductions in recycling were observed, first through Li pellet
conditioning[1], and later with other techniques utilizing Li evaporation[2]. Target
plasmas with reduced hydrogenic content following intensive Li conditioning were used
as targets for beam fueling in the supershot regime, and led directly to the highest fusion
performance discharges obtained on TFTR, including both D-D and D-T plasmas.
Experiments on C-Mod[3] and DIII-D[4] showed little or no effect on wall conditioning
and recycling after Li pellet injections. Since C-Mod has no carbon PFCs, while TFTR
used them exclusively, one conjecture for the differences between these two sets of
experiments relates to wall chemistry. However, DIII-D also has carbon plasma-facing
tiles, and so this does not yield a compelling explanation.
Recent C-Mod results on scrape-off-layer flows, and their dependence on separatrix
topology[5], may provide a unifying explanation for these seemingly contradictory
results. TFTR had no divertor, and the discharges were limited on the inner wall. For both
DIII-D and C-Mod, previous Li wall conditioning attempts were carried out in single-null
divertor topology. Based on our current understanding of particle dynamics and SOL
flows, we would expect that most of the lithium leaving the plasma following pellet
injection will do so near the outboard midplane, and then will be deposited preferentially
at the inner divertor strike point, on the high field side, carried by the strong asymmetric
flows; additional Li might be deposited on the outboard limiters, due to the intermittent
(blob) transport. However, little, or none of the Li would be expected to flow to the
outer divertor leg, which is the region that sees the dominant heat flux in single null
cases. This picture is also consistent with the results of post campaign tile analysis carried
out by Dennis Whyte, showing that boron is eroded from the outer strike area, and
deposited at the inner strike region. While we do not entirely know the overall dynamics,
one explanation for the need to re-boronize after a few hundred discharges, is this erosion
of the boron layer from the highest heat flux region of the outer divertor. 13C tracer
experiments on DIII-D show similar results on erosion and deposition[6]. For the TFTR
limited case, the Li should have been deposited on the inner wall, just in the regions that
also experience the highest heat flux.
Based on our current understanding of the origin of the strong SOL flows, an approach
which should allow for the escaping lithium to find the high heat flux outer divertor leg,
is to inject pellets into double-null plasmas. In this case the flows cannot reach the inner
leg, and particles leaving on the low-field side must end up on the outer legs (both upper
and lower) and possibly the outboard limiters. This opens a new line of investigation,
which might be fruitful for controlling molybdenum influx, and perhaps recycling as
well, without the need for boronization.


SHOT SEQUENCE

Start from a standard .8 MA SNL shot, nl_04=1e20 m^-2.
Apply RF from .6 to 1.0 seconds, 3 MW (1 MW each from D, E and J) to obtain HMode(s) (ELM free or EDA).
Tune to double null by about 1.1 seconds, monitoring SOL
flows to find the SSEP that corresponds to the stagnated double-null. Use multiple probe
plunges as possible and appropriate. ISP will probably be the most sensitive measure;
we want minimum flow and density to the inner midplane. (4 shots)
Keep SSEP fixed at that value until 1.55 seconds. Add Li pellet injection, 3 pellets per
discharge, injected at 1.1, 1.25 and 1.4 seconds. This gives enough time for most of the
lithium to leave the discharge before the subsequent pellet is injected or the equilibrium
changes.
Monitor discharge conditions (impurities, etc.), particularly during the RF phase of each
subsequent discharge, continuing to inject Li pellets during the double-null phase of the
discharges. (15 shots)
Continue to run the same plasma, but without Li injection, again monitoring all relevant
parameters (5 shots).

Physics Operators Plans
Entered: Mar 16 2005 03:54:34:700PM
Author: Steve Wolfe
Engineering setup and Physop Plan for
Thursday, 17-Mar-2005

MP#414 Divertor Conditioning with Li pellets in near-DN discharges
SL: Marmar
PO: wolfe

Overnight ECDC in D2, bake at 60C

Power systems as on 1050311024

Gas setup:
___________
fill B-top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4)
fill B-side lower with 2 psi Ar Hybrid ENabled (PG1)
leave B-side upper with 15 psi He3 Hybrid DISabled (PG2)
fill B-main (former C-side) with 30 psi D2, Hybrid enabled (PG3)
fill lower capillaries (NINJA plenum) with 10 psi D2

Vacuum setup:
_____________
GV1 OPEN, Pump valves NOT closed in pulse
Enable ECE, Z-bolo shutters (assuming no vacuum problems)
Enable Li pellet injector gate valve

ICRF setup: all transmitters in run on by 8:30 am

------------------------------------------------------
PO Plan:
---------
Load active segment from seg4 of 1050311024, which has SSEP control
and goes from SSEP=-.005 to 0 starting at .9sec. It also had copious
runaways and some small injections after 1sec; we don't want either of
those, so pick a good startup from 1050315 or 1050316, and hope for the
best on the injections.

Move SSEP transition to be between 1.0 and 1.1sec, and possibly decrease
pre-transition value to -.01; also work on the offset, since -2500 seems
not to be correct anymore. Leave SSEP at 0 until 1.55sec, then go
back to lower null for most of rampdown (? Not sure why, that's what's
implied in the MP. Check with ESM on this.)

Remove drop in ZXL gain at 0.9sec

Raise nl_04 to 1.0e20 from 9e19.

Tune SSEP and equilibrium shape based on flow stagnation measurement
with probes. (4shots)

Leave equilibrium alone as SL carries out pellet injection experiments during
DN phase, as described in the MP. Try to keep startup happy, otherwise
resist the urge to tweak.

Leave a good one on the drum.

Go home and drink lots of Irish Whisky in honor of St Pat's Day,
while watching first round of NCAA tournament.


Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Mar 19 2005 09:43:43:513AM
Author: Earl Marmar
We accomplished a substantial fraction of the run plan.

The configuration was tuned after a few shots, using the ISP to look at density and flows to determine the SSEP that gave the smallest of each. This was around SSEP = -1 to -2 mm. Lithium pellets were injected on many subsequent shots. However, in most cases, the plasma disrupted after either the first or second pellet. We never managed to get 3 pellets into a single discharge. A total of 21 pellets were injected, all but 2 into near double-null. Shot 24 was LSN all the way through, with 2 pellets, and no disruption.

There were no obvious effects of the lithium on any of monitored plasma parameters, including radiated power, h-factor, H/(H+D) and core moly radiation (HIREX). Chromex measurements clearly saw neutral Li emission from the lower outer divertor. Mo I emission from this region was weak even before the first pellet, and did not appear to change much. While the numerous post-pellet disruptions may have muddled the result somewhat, the initial conclusion is that the pellets had little or no effect in terms of wall conditioning.

There are a number of pulses with steady RF at 3MW total (D+E+J), giving dithery/tiny ELM H-modes; h_89~1 assuming 100% absorbed. Total power (RF launched, plus ohmic) was over 3.5 MW on most shots. Shots 22, 23, 26, 27 and 28 are good examples. H/(H+D) started the day at or below 5%; by the last shot it was approaching 10%.

Physics Operator Summaries
Entered: Mar 17 2005 06:15:30:147PM
Author: Steve Wolfe
Physop Summary for March 17, 2005
MP#414
SL: Marmar
PO: wolfe
EO: Cochran, Dekow, Parkin

The equilibrium change setup went ok, but the DN plasmas were not very
robust and we had lots of pellet-induced disruptions. We ended up with a
flow stagnation point according to Brian's ISP when EFIT claimed
SSEP= -1 to -2mm, which corresponded to a programmed value of -.003. I decided
not to mess with the SSEP offset, because the discrepancy seems to be between
the fluxihh value and the EFIT value, not really an offset as such. There were
some apparent injections while close to DN, especially on the SSEP~0 shots, as
there had been on 1050311. We did not try a full upper null, but there is still
a concern something is not right in the upper vessel. No dust was visible on the
cameras, but they now have filters.

Li injection did not have any apparent beneficial effects. It may have been implicated in problems in the current ramp phase (see below), but probably not. While we had fewer successful pellets than hoped, and more disruptions, the experimental plan was essentially completed, without positive result.

We had several runaway shots early in the run, all associated with outside
bouncing startups. At shot 10 I changed the RCUR offset in seg1 from 1500 to 2000, while also increasing pg4 for the third or fourth time, to 35msec. We did not have any further runaway shots, at least at the level of getting snow on the cameras. However, after that we ran into a new pathology: very radiative, cold (hollow temperature profiles) current rise phase in segment 4, basically between 200 and 400msec. Ian reported peaked core radiation, and Amanda was seeing hollow Te with Te0 as low as 300eV. This effect was especially pronounced after a big injection around 400ms killed shot 12, but Ian says the radiation was already starting to increase by shot 9. Current was not reaching flattop until after .6sec, and hanging around at 650kA a long time, which was not the case early in the run. Shot#1 had Te0~2500eV at 200ms, and shot 28 had 600eV.

I suspected that something about the SSEP control, which was on from the beginning of seg4, was causing the slow startup, maybe forcing an interaction
with the outer limiter, or the upper chamber. I made a number of unsuccessful attempts to remedy the situation, including gas and equilibrium tweaks.
At shot 21 I copied essentially
all the waveforms from a standard lower null shot, except for SSEP, into
the active segment 4; that failed to improve the ramp phase at all. On shot 24
we reverted to a standard lower null (from 1050316018), and that didn't help
either. It didn't get worse over the last five shots, may have been improving very slightly.

The last five shots (24-28) were lower null, the last 4 without pellets, as
called for in the plan. The current ramp may have improved marginally over
this period, but certainly did not get back to the state at the beginning of
the day.

There were two no power shots. On shot 2 a TF breaker pulled out in init; this turned out to be an actual breaker failure, and we had a long delay to swap in the spare breaker. On shot 17 dpcs_init hung up in Init, although it finally completed, after we had opened the breakers and set up for no power. DPCS apparently worked fine on this shot; this is the first time I know of that the DPCS_INIT task has had any problem. We also had one very short plasma (<40msec) on shot 15; this was effectively a fizzle, although the current got to 130kA before it either hit something or was hit by something at 32msec.

Scorecard:
Tests/No power 2
Duds 0
Fizzles 0
Early term 2 (including one ~40msec and one ~400msec)
Plasmas 24
---------- ---
Shots 28

Session Leader Comments
Mar 17 2005 10:06:13:930AM1050317001Earl MarmarLPI at 1.1 second; got the pellet;

J3 off for this shot, so J is a monopole (0.5 MW, J4 only)

H/(H+D) ~ .05, rising during RF to ~0.08,
then maybe drops slightly after the pellet


Mar 17 2005 09:30:56:823AM1050317002Earl Marmarno power shot; power supply problem during init
Mar 17 2005 10:33:12:417AM1050317003Earl Marmarplasma

single pellet again at 1.1 seconds

disrupt at 1.25 seconds, after lithium mostly gone.

Brian reports it took a little more gas to fuel this shot, compared to shot 3

several short dithery H-modes; RF power unavailable (digitizer problem)


Mar 17 2005 11:29:56:090AM1050317004Earl Marmarno pellet this shot

Mar 17 2005 11:30:38:057AM1050317005Earl Marmarno pellet, ISP scanning
looks like small counter flow
reduce late SSEP slightly for next shot
Mar 17 2005 11:31:09:963AM1050317006Earl Marmarlooks like less flow on ISP
we'll stay here for now
Mar 17 2005 11:42:25:167AM1050317007Earl Marmarprogram for 3 Li pellets (1.2, 1.35, 1.5 seconds)
only got the first pellet
disrupts at 1.245 s; density increase from pellet has mostly decayed by then
Mar 17 2005 12:00:07:777PM1050317008Earl MarmarLi pellets programmed for 1.2 and 1.4 seconds - position 1, barrels 3 and 4
got both pellets; pretty prompt disruption after the second pellet

more RF trips on this shot; hard to compare Mo with previous shots

Mar 17 2005 12:09:09:323PM1050317008Earl MarmarLi pellets programmed for 1.2, 1.35 and 1.5 seconds
Got the first only, then pretty prompt disrupt (35 msec after the pellet hits)
density decayed most of the way before the disruption

This shot had a much lower target density, because of a TCI feedback problem
Mar 17 2005 12:44:23:777PM1050317010Earl Marmar2 Li pellets (1.2 and 1.45 seconds). Got both. Disrupt after second pellet.
Mar 17 2005 12:59:58:620PM1050317011Earl MarmarLi pellets at 1.33 and 1.5
Got the first pellet, then disrupt
Mar 17 2005 12:59:05:010PM1050317012Earl Marmarprogrammed for Li pellets at 1.15 and 1.3 seconds

early disruption, before RF; no pellets
Mar 17 2005 01:19:51:027PM1050317013Earl Marmartry again
pellets programmed for 1.15 and 1.3 seconds
didn't get the first pellet
Got the second, no disruption
Mar 17 2005 01:33:24:370PM1050317014Earl Marmarpellets programmed for 1.15, 1.3 and 1.45 seconds
got the first, disrupt before the second

Mar 17 2005 01:49:04:260PM1050317015Earl MarmarLi pellets programmed at 1.15 and 1.3

very early demise (~100 kA)

no pellets fired
Mar 17 2005 02:06:53:213PM1050317016Earl MarmarLi pellets programmed for 1.15 and 1.3

Got only the first, no disruption
Mar 17 2005 02:15:35:090PM1050317017Earl Marmarno power shot
data system problem during init
Mar 17 2005 02:33:12:260PM1050317018Earl Marmarprogrammed for 3 pellets 1.15, 1.3, 1.45 s
got the first, then disrupts after about 45 msec


Mar 17 2005 03:07:22:993PM1050317019Earl Marmar2 pellets called for and injected
disrupt after second pellet, most of density decayed

no J-port on this shot
Mar 17 2005 03:34:10:993PM1050317021Earl Marmarprogrammed for 2 pellets
got the first at 1.15, then disrupt later
Mar 17 2005 03:47:57:667PM1050317022Earl Marmarprogram for 1 pellet at 1.15
did not get the pellet
Mar 17 2005 04:02:55:010PM1050317023Earl Marmarset for 3 pellets,

got 2, then disrupt
Mar 17 2005 04:48:14:870PM1050317024Earl Marmarstandard lower single null shot all the way through

programmed for 3 pellets (1.0, 1.25, 1.45 s); got the first 2, although second density rise is smaller
no third pellet
no disruption
Mar 17 2005 04:49:44:883PM1050317025Earl Marmarno pellets
standard LSN
watch to see if Li disappears shot by shot from the divertor (chromex)
continue to monitor moly, radiated power, etc. for the rest of the shots today
Mar 17 2005 04:50:14:277PM1050317026Earl Marmarrepeat
Mar 17 2005 04:58:30:680PM1050317027Earl Marmarrepeat
Mar 17 2005 05:09:48:823PM1050317028Earl Marmarrepeat
nothing dramatically different

Physics Operator Comments
Mar 17 2005 08:01:58:770AMSteve WolfeSetting up for Earl's Li Pellet experiment MP#414:
Startup seg using last settings from yesterday-
IC_ef4= -1335
RCUR offset=1500
Br0 = -.002
pg4 = 28ms
v_oh1 = 100 between 0 and 11ms
v_ef3 = 2650,2400,2500 @[-.001,.005,.012]
Current and Bz rise could stand being faster than on
1050316018, but there was no hesitation and no hards.

Import seg4 from 1050311024
seg2 off, seg4 on
change title LN->DN (instead of UN)
Increase nl04 9e19 to 1e20
Note: zcur is set to 0 instead of -.009
Remove drop in ZXL gain
Move SSEP swing to be from 1.0 to 1.1sec (was 0.9 to 0.94)
and back down to LN between 1.55 and 1.8
reduce pg3 at .1, increase a little at .3:.6
Load into model
Load at 17-Mar-2005 08:01:32.00
Open tree /home/wolfe/pcs_scratch -1
Open tree done

Mar 17 2005 09:15:03:480AM1050317001Steve WolfeShot#1: Try for plasma, similar to 1050311024 but
with slower and later ssep swing (see plan)
LPI will fire at 1.1sec on this shot to check out system

Plasma, full length.
Got a pellet, also injections from upper chamber.
SSEP looks a little bit positive after the swing,
Looks like ssep goes more positive in rampdown, though
I programmed it to go negative again? Gain is off at
1.5sec.

Next shot: extend ssep gain to 2sec


Mar 17 2005 09:34:08:870AM1050317002Steve WolfeShot#2:extend ssep gain to 2sec
pellets will fire again.
Blab not in yet, so no ISP data

Forgot to load the ssep change, but the breakers
came out in INIT so we had a no power shot anyway.

DPCS timed out but I didn't get a message.





Mar 17 2005 09:52:02:260AM1050317002Steve WolfeThere is a delay while the engineers look at a problem
with one of the TF breakers in the power room.

The cell is available for CONTROLLED ACCESS
Mar 17 2005 10:29:25:837AM1050317003Steve WolfeShot#3:extend ssep gain to 2sec (loaded this time)
pellets will fire again.
Brian wants the inner gap changed for targeting the ISP
increase clearin by 3mm to .003 and rcur by 1.5mm from
0.7sec on.

plasma to 1.25sec
EFC floors at 1.15sec?




Mar 17 2005 10:54:12:150AM1050317004Steve WolfeShot#4: No pellet this time, reduce Ip gain from 9 to 5
after 1sec
May need to slow the ssep transition down.
plasma to 1.77sec, one small injection on Dalpha at
1.29sec. SSEp still doesn't come down in rampdown

Gain is there, try adding another point later in the
waveform; DPCS may not be holding that last point?






Mar 17 2005 11:09:32:230AM1050317005Steve WolfeShot#5: try adding another point later in the SSEP
waveform; DPCS may not be holding that last point?
Brian will scan, still no pellet.

Plasma to 1.65, with runaways. Lots of action on halpha
from 1.45sec on.

next shot: 1mm less far on SSEP.



Mar 17 2005 11:21:54:727AM1050317006Steve WolfeShot#6: SSEP to -.003, Pg4 to 31msec
plasma to 1.75, no injections on Halpha in second
half of shot. Still no pellet, RF off at 0.9sec

SSEP is -1 to -2mm after 1sec, still doesn't seem
to be going back down according to EFIT?

next shot: Drop NL04 to 7e19 after RF



Mar 17 2005 11:41:55:040AM1050317007Steve WolfeShot#7: Drop NL04 to 7e19 after RF, pellets to start
at 1.2sec

Runaways again, and short. Disrupts at 1.26sec
Startup is bouncy again. Density rises after 1 sec,
may be NINJA, may be eq. change.

next shot: NINJA off. Increase pg4 again



Mar 17 2005 11:52:28:213AM1050317008Steve WolfeShot#8: NINJA off. Increase pg4 to 32ms!
plasma to 1.4sec, second pellet killed it.
Density is down before the pellet this time,
so the rise may have been NINJA.

Voltage goes up to 2V at the first pellet and never
comes back down. A couple of additional spikes on
Halpha between the pellets may be dust.





Mar 17 2005 12:08:11:777PM1050317009Steve WolfeShot#9: No changes
Can't get rid of the runaways!
plasma to 1.24sec, gas turned off at 0.3sec and density
ended up at 6e19 during the RF; it may be repetitive
H-modes?
Wmhd reaches 99kJ.
First pellet killed it though.

Next shot: Increase RCUR offset in seg1

Mar 17 2005 12:37:33:993PM1050317010Steve WolfeShot#10: Increase RCUR offset in seg1 1500 to 2000,pg4 to 35msec
plasma to 1.51sec
Second pellet killed it, after nearly recovering.
Current and Bz rise still seem slow, no runaways.

Mar 17 2005 12:51:56:243PM1050317011Steve WolfeShot#11: No pcs changes
plasma to 1.38sec; that was the second pellet,
but didn't get the first pellet.

Mar 17 2005 01:07:32:400PM1050317012Steve WolfeShot#12: No pcs changes
Early disruption, .45sec
In trouble from .33, around crossover,
then something big comes in around 0.4sec

No obvious control problems or failed sensors.
Blame it on meteorites and try again
Mar 17 2005 01:19:50:430PM1050317013Steve WolfeShot#13: No pcs changes
plasma to 1.8sec. One pellet.
SSEP is still not going back down in rampdown
according to EFIT; Aout thinks it is doing almost what
it's supposed to, which means the predictor is wrong
or else EFIT is. Aout is +1700 at 1.8sec, when the current
is down below 400kA, which means 4mm error which may be
right; I'm now only asking for about a 4mm change.

Next shot: Ask for SSEP=-.015 in rampdown
Mar 17 2005 01:35:05:290PM1050317014Steve WolfeShot#14: Ask for SSEP=-.015 in rampdown
plasma to 1.21, looks like first pellet at 1.15 did it in.
We had a couple of early injections .13 and .21sec seen
on Halpha which take smal bites out of the current rise.
Current gain steps are at .34(small) and .63

Next shot: move the second step to .5sec
Mar 17 2005 01:48:28:883PM1050317015Steve WolfeShot#15: Ask for SSEP=-.015 in rampdown
move the second Ip gain step to .5sec
Got to 130kA at 32msec and died?

next shot: reduce inner gap and try to move
outer lower strike point down
Mar 17 2005 02:27:13:400PM1050317016Steve WolfeShot#16: RXL flat at 0, ZXL downto 0 at .6, -.005 at 1.5
clearin back to 0, rcur in by .0015

plasma to 1.7sec, 1 pellet at 1.15sec
early seg2 current rise is ratty; looks like EF4 turns
around at about .25, when ef2_by_ef4 comes on.

Next shot: try to move ZXL even lower, drop Zcur
Mar 17 2005 02:16:29:323PM1050317017Steve WolfeShot#17: ZXL down another 5mm, ZCur to -.009
dpcs_init hung in init/ NO POWER shot
Mar 17 2005 02:35:58:730PM1050317018Steve WolfeShot#18: ZXL down another 5mm, ZCur to -.009
Try again.
Plasma to 1.21sec, killed by pellet

next shot: Earl wants the strike point after 1.1
where it is during RF, so I need to move zxl down
more; the right way would be to turn on strkpsi.
Mar 17 2005 02:49:16:277PM1050317019Steve WolfeShot#19: Earl wants the strike point after 1.1
where it is during RF, so I need to move zxl down
more.

Plasma to 1.44, second pellet did it in.
Strike point stil too high at pellet.
And we have a baseline offset on f15! It doesn't look bad,
may be ok.
Yijun says FMIT#3 has a problem.



Mar 17 2005 03:13:33:290PM1050317020Steve WolfeShot#20: Try moving rxl in during the shot
Increase early pg3 in seg2 to try to reduce reported
core radiation between .2 and .4sec

plasma to 1.23sec, early phase looks worse

Mar 17 2005 03:32:54:383PM1050317021Steve WolfeShot#21: Remove pg3 increase, set Ic_ef4 to 2000
ef2_by_ef4 to -2000 (from -3000)

plasma to 1.2sec, current rise is worse.
EF2U actually goes to zero at .3 this time.
Had an f27 baseline warning this time; may have
fixed itself

Next shot: copy in waveforms from seg2 for
RCUR, CLEARIN, ZCUR, RXL, ZXL, EF2by EF4, IC_EF4,Ip
Mar 17 2005 03:43:26:680PM1050317022Steve WolfeShot#22:copy in waveforms from seg2 for
RCUR, CLEARIN, ZCUR, RXL, ZXL, EF2by EF4, IC_EF4,Ip
decrease nl04 to 8e18
plasma to 1.9sec, current ramp still terrible.
No pellets. Flux loops look ok this time.

next shot: Move rcur in before .6sec to increase right gap.


Mar 17 2005 03:57:09:557PM1050317023Steve WolfeShot#23: Move rcur in by 2mm before .5sec to increase
right gap. Decrease early SSEP from -7mm to -1cm, start
sweep at .95sec

plasma to 1.33sec, still horrible early.
F27 has baseline shift this time. Also F01.

next shot: Change to seg2 (LN like yesterday)



Mar 17 2005 04:12:58:573PM1050317024Steve WolfeShot#24: Change to seg2 (LN like yesterday)
plasma to 1.83, First 500msec still horrible.
Solid lower null throughout. Got two pellets.

next shot: No pcs changes, no pellets, extend RF

Mar 17 2005 04:27:25:883PM1050317025Steve WolfeShot#25: plasma to 1.8, looks like type 3 elmy H-mode
Current rise still bad, early radiation and low central
Te.
Not getting some updates on my scopes, we lost the announce
in init and had to restart it.
Mar 17 2005 04:50:18:570PM1050317026Steve WolfeShot#26: No pcs changes, no pellets
plasma full length, current rise still bad.
Breakdown is very late, after 7ms
Fields look ok or at least no different.
Leave it alone and see if it gets better.
Mar 17 2005 05:04:12:073PM1050317027Steve WolfeShot#27: No pcs changes, no pellets
Plasma full length, still poor current rise.
One H->L around .95sec, RF stays on.
Breakdown back earlier, 6.3ms.

next shot: No changes, will be last shot of the day
Mar 17 2005 05:13:16:307PM1050317028Steve WolfeShot#28: No changes
plasma, full length
Current rise phase not noticeably better,
Te0 may be a little higher early. Still have a major
fast spike on Halpha at .219sec.
Two short H->L in the middle of a clean RF pulse.

END OF RUN

Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
109:05:28:057AMPlasmaOk
209:26:05:777AMPlasmaBadTF Breaker Failure
310:21:42:307AMPlasmaOk
410:42:51:573AMPlasmaOk
510:55:52:167AMPlasmaOk
611:12:31:370AMPlasmaOk
711:31:49:823AMPlasmaOk
811:45:21:947AMPlasmaOk
911:59:49:823AMPlasmaOk
1012:26:59:680PMPlasmaOk
1112:43:15:900PMPlasmaOk
1212:56:06:667PMPlasmaOk
1301:10:04:870PMPlasmaOk
1401:26:02:040PMPlasmaOk
1501:43:43:040PMPlasmaOk
1601:56:53:133PMPlasmaOk
1702:13:33:150PMPlasmaBadHybrid System Hung
1802:25:45:430PMPlasmaOk
1902:38:37:917PMPlasmaOk
2003:05:50:917PMPlasmaOk
2103:19:16:540PMPlasmaOk
2203:38:18:590PMPlasmaOk
2303:50:25:323PMPlasmaOk
2404:04:13:040PMPlasmaOk
2504:21:32:290PMPlasmaOk
2604:38:42:590PMPlasmaOk
2704:54:01:040PMPlasmaOk
2805:06:28:900PMPlasmaOk