| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Amanda Hubbard |
| Physics operator(s): | Steve Wolfe |
| Engineering operator(s): | Bill Cochran,Bill Byford |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| MP#397 |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Apr 6 2005 04:10:43:757PM |
| Author: Amanda Hubbard |
| Run Plan for 1050407: MP 397 Comparison of C-Mod EDA regime with JFT2M HRS regime - Pre-boron comparison Session Leaders: Amanda Hubbard, Naoyuki Oyama, Kensaku Kamiya Physics Operator: Steve Wolfe Purpose: On both C-Mod and JFT2-M, boronization has operationally been found to be a necessary condition for steady EDA or HRS regimes. However, the corresponding physics reason is not very well understood, since we have for several years mostly been running with boronized walls. For this run, we plan to revisit the plasma shape and bulk parameters of a previous successful comparison with JFT2M at q_95=3.4 (on 1040416). We will scan density and increase power, comparing the edge temperature, collisionality and fluctuations with those observed with boronized conditions. If time permits, we will repeat at higher q_95 = 4.8, in anticipation of future post-boronization scans at this q. While not part of the original mini-proposal, this run day will exploit the current all-metal machine conditions and should contribute to the JOULE milestone to study the effects of removing boron from C-Mod. Run Plan: 1) Start with plasma equilibrium, shape from 1040416016, density from 1040416011 (EDA+"Type II" ELMS) (5.4 T, 940 kA, target nel 9x10^19 m-2). Check shape and tweak if necessary given changes to control system. Tune RF (2 shots). 2) Add 3 MW RF, to make H-mode. Compare pedestal density to that of 1040416011 (ne_95=1.85e20 m-3). Adjust target if necessary to match. (2 shots) 3) Power scan, shot to shot: 2 MW, 3 MW, 4 MW, 5(if avail) MW. Monitor edge pedestals (Edge TS, ECE), edge fluctuations (PCI), ELMs (D_alpha, magnetics), radiation profiles (bolos) (6 shots). If needed, use between shot ECDC to keep H/D below 5%. 4) Reduce target ne to that of 1040416016 (7x10^19 m-2). Check if sustained H-modes are achieved, at ~ 3 MW. If so, repeat limited power scan. (3 shots) 5) Reduce density shot to shot to find low ne limit (ideally to that of 1040416026 (which previously gave large ELMs), target 4x10^19 m-2. Repeat RF scan, look for edge Te, nu*, ELMs. (6 shots.) Time permitting, in anticipation of future post-boronization run: 6) Reduce current to 660 kA, should give q_95=4.8. If needed, tweak Ip and shape. Tune RF (2 shots). 7) Repeat prior density and power scans, again starting with nel=7e19 m-2. (We will let prior experience guide our choices of parameters). |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Entered: Apr 6 2005 05:04:10:360PM |
| Author: Steve Wolfe |
Physics Operator Plan for Thursday, 7-Apr-2005 MP#397 Comparison of C-Mod EDA regime with JFT2-M HRS regime SL: Hubbard, Oyama, Kimiya PO: wolfe Engineering setup: ------------------ Overnight ECDC, bake at 60C Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 17:00 (EDT) Power systems as on 1040416019 A-coil in standard configuration (+Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot) C-coil Start=0.3sec, Invert=2.0sec Transmitters #1,2,3,4 in RUN-ON by 08:30 Gas setup: fill B-top 6psi D2 Hybrid Enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower 1psi Argon Hybrid Enabled (PG1) leave B-side Upper alone Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) fill B-main 30psi D2 Hybrid Enabled (PG3) Enable (assuming no vacuum problems): ECE, VUV, Z-bolo shutter We WILL be running ECDC for 5 minutes between shots until we decide not to. We will NOT be closing the gate valves in pulse. ---------------------- Plan: Load seg2 from 1040416019 Update offsets, predictors Change nl04 target to 9e19 Program an A-coil waveform Load seg1 from a decent startup from 1050406 1) Check and tweak shape, wait for RF to get tuned 2) At 3MW rf, tweak nl04 to match pedestal density of 1.7e20/m^3 3) Power scan 2-5 MW 4) Reduce target nl04 to 7e19, Prf=3MW; may do limited power scan 5) Reduce nl04 to lower limit, e.g. 4e19/m^2; repeat power scan 6) Ip to 660kA (q95~4.8),nl04=7e19; tweak Ip and/or shape to taste. 7) Scan nl04 and RF power until we run out of time. |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Apr 8 2005 02:18:44:450PM |
| Author: Amanda Hubbard |
| Run summary for 1050407: MP 397 Comparison of C-Mod EDA regime with
JFT2M HRS regime - Pre-boron comparison Session Leaders: Amanda Hubbard, Naoyuki Oyama (JAERI), Kensaku Kamiya (JAERI) Physics Operator: Steve Wolfe Purpose: On both C-Mod and JFT2-M, boronization has operationally been found to be a necessary condition for steady EDA or HRS regimes. However, the corresponding physics reason is not very well understood, since we have for several years mostly been running with boronized walls. For this run, we plan to revisit the plasma shape and bulk parameters of a previous successful comparison with JFT2M at q_95=3.4 (on 1040416). We will scan density and increase power, comparing the edge temperature, collisionality and fluctuations with those observed with boronized conditions. If time permits, we will repeat at higher q_95 = 4.8, in anticipation of future post-boronization scans at this q. While not part of the original mini-proposal, this run day will exploit the current all-metal machine conditions and should contribute to the JOULE milestone to study the effects of removing boron from C-Mod. Results: Overall, quite a successful day. The machine and RF generally ran well, and we covered essentially the planned operational space at q_95=3.4. Given the extra shots needed for RF tuning etc, we did not get to the high q part of the run. To summarize, we carried out density and power scans with JFT-2M like shape at IP/BT~0.9MA/5.4T (q95~3.4). As previously observed before boronization, the global character was that of standard ELM-free H-modes, with increasing density and radiated power which are terminated by H-L transitions, sometimes preceded by small Type-III-like ELMs. The pedestal electron pressure, pe,ped, was limited at almost constant pe,ped in over a wide range of collisionality, nu*e,ped, (~0.2-5.0). The pedestal density and line averaged density overlap well the ranges of the previous boronized plasmas on 1040416. The apparent pedestal density is lower, but the TS density calibration is currently uncertain; this needs to be resolved by better edge cross-calibration and/or Raman scattering to allow conclusions about the relative pedestal pressures which may shed light on the reasons for the different H-mode behaviour without boronization. An interesting result was that the 'QC-mode', a key signature of Endhanced D_alpha H-mode, was seen by PCI, at f~150 kHz, only at higher nu*e,ped during 'ELM-free' periods. Its amplitude increase with density, particularly during the later shots with gas puffing (27 and 28). Its amplitude was rather weak and apparently not sufficient to stabilize the density rise, although it was noted that dne/dt decreased. Shots 14-17 are good examples with target ne 9e19 m-2; 17 had the best RF. The QC mode was not noted in prior experiments at standard C-Mod shape (eg 1050406), though we should go back and reexamine the PCI data. H-factors were up to 1.6 transiently in the first H-mode, but ~1 in steady periods). At lower target density, the H-modes consisted of very short 'dithers', triggered by, and lasting only for the duration of, large sawtooth heat pulses. There were strong buildups of edge radiation, expelled at the back-transitions. However, in contrast to prior runs, this seemed to give a 'quasi-steady' state with near-constant density and radiation, with the back-transitions filling the usual role of ELMs or QC-mode (which was not present). Energy confinement was better, with H up to 1.5 transiently and 1.3 for long periods, as good as we have seen pre-boronization. Shots 18-20 had target nel 7e19 m-2, shot 19 has the cleanest RF (3 MW) and 20 the highest (4 MW). Te_95 was 400-600 eV. Shot 21 had the lowest density (5e19 m-2 target, 8e19 H-mode), and hottest pedestal (up to 800 eV). Dropping the density further resulted in a nasty disruption (shot 22), which took a few shots to recover from (23-26). Further analysis of the kinetic and radiation profiles, both of which require improved absolute calibrations, are needed. We are optimistic that this will help resolve the physical differences pre and post boronization H-modes, and thank all participants (especially machine and RF operators, ETS, bolometry and PCI diagnostics) for their capable operation and assistance. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Apr 7 2005 06:26:30:847PM |
| Author: Steve Wolfe |
Physop Summary 1050407
MP#397 JFT2-M / C-Mod Comparison (pre-boron special edition)
SL: Hubbard, Kamiya, Oyama
PO: wolfe
EO: the Bills (Cochran, Byford, Parkin)
This was a pretty good run from the operational standpoint, and
we got much of the planned program done, despite some early difficulties.
All of the steps at q=3.4 were addressed. It took a few more shots than
anticipated to match the shape and q=3.4 of the 1040416 experiment. The shape
started out quite close, and only required some small tweaks, but for some
reason the current had to be reduceed to 900kA (from program value of 960 in
the old shot) to get the q95=3.4 value.
There was also a problem at the start of the day with the J4 crowbar
system. Apparently a low voltage supply had failed. This required a number of
power room accesses, as well as trips to the high yard, to repair. J-port
became available at shot#8.
I initially had some difficulty raising the density to the requested value. It
behaved as if the gain on the nl04 feedback was insufficient. It was necessary
to provide a substantial maintenance pg3 level (>60V) to get nl04 above 1e20.
Once I did that the target density came out as programmed. Of course the
maintenance level had to be reduced when we went to lower density.
We used five minutes of ecdc between most shots, and the H/D was maintained
pretty stable as a result. We actually got H/D down to ~3% at the higher
density end of the scans. On several shots the engineers were unable to get
the between-shot ecdc started because of some interlock problem, so we skipped
those rather than delay things further. I didn't wait for the base pressure to
come down after ecdc as far as I had on Tuesday. It worked just fine if I only
held off pushing the button until 3 to 4e-6.
Startup was reasonably robust all day, but despite trying everything I could
think of (see logbook), I was unable to do anything about the runaways. There
still seems to be a slight tendency for Bz to rise by 1-2 mT over the course
of the day, which I compensated by raising IC_EF4U by 10Amps on two
occasions.
Things were going pretty smoothly until we pushed our luck going to low
density and high power on shot#22. This resulted in a hard disruption during
the RF pulse, which took two fizzles and two short (~200ms) disruptions to
recover from. The last shots #27 and 28 returned to a higher target density
and used puffing into the h-mode to try to increase the collisionality and
provoke a QC mode. This may actually have worked (see SL summary). The best
shot of the day was a low collisionality case on shot#21, which achieved very
high pedestal temperatures and a semi-decent H-factor, with Wmhd~115kJ and
Rneut~1.5e13/sec.
Scorecard:
Tests 1
Duds 1 (No TF)
Fizzles 3
Short disruptions 2
Plasmas 21
============= ===
Shots 28
|
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Apr 7 2005 09:38:56:783AM | 1050407002 | Amanda Hubbard | Full length plasma. 0.95 MA, 5.34 T. q_95 =3.2, a little low. Shape close, requires slight change in x-pt position. nel0.8-1.2 e20 m-2. ETS channels out of pedestal. |
| Apr 7 2005 09:57:23:350AM | 1050407003 | Amanda Hubbard | Good shot. 0.95 MA, 5.34 T. q_95 =3.2, still a little low. nel0.8-1.4 e20 m-2. RF 2.3 MW, many trips. Series of what look like ELM-free H-modes. But, what looks like a QC mode is reported on PCI during H-modes, at around 150 kHz. Jery and Ted will adjust ETS fiber positions. Repeat. |
| Apr 7 2005 10:39:00:917AM | 1050407004 | Amanda Hubbard | Good shot- similar ELM-free series. 0.945 MA, 5.44 T. q_95 =3.23, still a little low. nel0.8-1.3 e20 m-2., nebar 2.3e20 m-3. "strong QC mode". But, ne and Prac are rising rapidly. RF 2.2 MW, sereral trips. Edge TS positions seem better (trouble plotting profiles). ne_95 up to 1.4e20 m-3. (BUT calibration may be low!) Te_95 0.43-0.6 keV. (this is hotter than yesterday). |
| Apr 7 2005 10:42:04:903AM | 1050407004 | Amanda Hubbard | Good shot- similar ELM-free series. 0.92 MA, 5.44 T. q_95 =3.33, still a little low. nel0.85-1.3 e20 m-2., nebar 2.5e20 m-3. - about the same as 1040416016 RF has more trips. 2.7 MW max, this seems to be the limit (note that J-port transmitter out of action for now.) Te_95 up to 560 eV, |
| Apr 7 2005 11:57:03:110AM | 1050407005 | Amanda Hubbard | H-modes similar to shot 4. Got q=3.3.5 (920 kA). |
| Apr 7 2005 10:55:29:987AM | 1050407006 | Amanda Hubbard | Similar, but q_95 now up to 3.4 as desired. 900 kA. I'm unclear why we need lower Ip this run, since shape appears to be the same. D-port is staying on well, E has a lot of trips. 2.6 MW max. Many ELM-free H-modes. Next shot: raise target ne, back off on E power. |
| Apr 7 2005 11:31:43:447AM | 1050407007 | Amanda Hubbard | Good. RF 2.5 MW, much cleaner. Density slightly higher, but not as much as requested: nel 9e19 m-2 target, 1.46 peak. QC mode appears about 0.75 secs, midway through first H-mode. Global character still appears as series of ELM-free H-modes, ne and Prad increasing. nebar up to 2.9 m-3, close to previous EDA range. Te_95 400 eV, |
| Apr 7 2005 11:47:32:447AM | 1050407008 | Amanda Hubbard | Steve's gas changes mean nel got to programmed nel 1.1e20 m-2, by 0.7 secs. Unfortunately, RF tune didn't like this, got no power. Retune, retry. |
| Apr 7 2005 12:03:57:800PM | 1050407009 | Amanda Hubbard | Early gas results in MARFE, nel up to 1.5e20. Not surprisingly, RF unhappy - 1 MW, (E only), L-mode. |
| Apr 7 2005 12:17:44:037PM | 1050407010 | Amanda Hubbard | Fizzle |
| Apr 7 2005 12:41:57:213PM | 1050407011 | Amanda Hubbard | Plasma. Got target 1.0e20 m-2 (nebar 2e20). RF starts 2 MW, mopstly just 1 MW. 3 H-modes, very brief. First seems to start with an extended Type III ELmy period, gradual ne rise. Retune, retry. |
| Apr 7 2005 12:48:03:563PM | 1050407012 | Amanda Hubbard | No TF |
| Apr 7 2005 01:12:49:623PM | 1050407013 | Kamiya | There is no clear QC-mode on PCI, except for a weak broadband one in frquency range between f~100-200. |
| Apr 7 2005 01:14:17:660PM | 1050407013 | Amanda Hubbard | Good shot. 2-3 MW RF. Several apparently ELM-free H-modes. No QC mosde appareent. Ne rise rate larger than in previous shots with weak QC mode. Te_95 ~ 400 eV. GPC is back, can see the erosion in edge T during each H-mode, as Prad rises. |
| Apr 7 2005 01:26:54:553PM | 1050407014 | Amanda Hubbard | Good shot. 2.8 MW RF, with a lot of trips (J unhappy). Several apparently ELM-free H-modes. No QC mosde appareent. No ECE- valve closed. This is likely as much power as we will get at this ne. Go back to target 9e19 m-3, as for shot 7. Try for 3 MW power. |
| Apr 7 2005 01:42:49:587PM | 1050407014 | Kamiya | Weak QC-mode is visible during ELM-free phase |
| Apr 7 2005 01:45:17:730PM | 1050407015 | Kamiya | Similar QC-mode activities with previous one (1050407014) |
| Apr 7 2005 01:54:38:750PM | 1050407016 | Kamiya | Similar QC-mode activities with previous one |
| Apr 7 2005 01:59:54:510PM | 1050407016 | Amanda Hubbard | Better RF, 2.8 MW, more steady. Still multiple, short H-modes.
RF seems to prefer the slightly larger gap. Retune, increase power. Te_95 ~ 400 eV |
| Apr 7 2005 02:09:51:790PM | 1050407017 | Kamiya | QC-mode channged to be somewhat stronger than that seen in previous shot. |
| Apr 7 2005 02:23:41:183PM | 1050407018 | Kamiya | No clear QC-mode |
| Apr 7 2005 02:38:46:547PM | 1050407018 | Amanda Hubbard |
Target 7e19 m-2, as requested. Rather different H-mode character. 3 MW RF. From D_alpha, and edge Te, seems we are getting very short H-modes at each sawtooth. But, density and Prad are quasi-steady (nel 1e20 m-2, nebar 2.1e20 m-3). 2pi foil bolo 3.1 MW (high), prad_main 1.5 MW. Edge is hotter, Te_95 (ETS) 400-600 eV (check). 100 kJ, H 1.5 (transient), 1.2 (steady) |
| Apr 7 2005 02:43:06:373PM | 1050407019 | Kamiya | No clear QC-mode |
| Apr 7 2005 02:51:57:137PM | 1050407019 | Amanda Hubbard |
Very nice, steady 3 MW RF. Again, quasi-steady 'dithering' H-mode. 108 kJ, Te8 680 ev( at sawtooth pulse/dither). Note nebar=2.1e20, comparable to 1040416022. Te_95 (ETS) 400-600 eV. H 1.5 (transient), 1.2 (steady) |
| Apr 7 2005 03:06:30:347PM | 1050407020 | Kamiya | No clear QC-mode |
| Apr 7 2005 04:06:36:247PM | 1050407020 | Amanda Hubbard | Similar to 19, but with up ro 4 MW RF - many trips however.
nel 0.7-1.1 e20 m-2. Note dithes more regular, and ne climbing slightly, in later period with higher RF. Te8 600 eV (pulse peak). Te_95 400 eV, |
| Apr 7 2005 03:17:10:173PM | 1050407021 | Kamiya | No clear QC-mode |
| Apr 7 2005 03:30:20:457PM | 1050407021 | Amanda Hubbard | Good. 0.5e20 target, 0.8 in quasi-steady dithering H-mode.
nebar 1.7e20 (comparable to previous Type I ELM shots) Big D_alpha oscillations early, (ELM-s or dithers??). 112 kJ, H=1.47 transient, 1.3 steady. |
| Apr 7 2005 03:47:48:057PM | 1050407022 | Amanda Hubbard | Lower target to 4e19 m-2. RF is high (4 MW), but the plasma is not happy-
very high Prad from beginning of RF, cooling edge. 2pi_foil 4.9 MW! Disrupts at 0.82 secs. Looks like a sort of dithering H-mode again, nel only 6e19 m-2, nebar 1.27 m-3; transition not clear, might be an L-mode. H does get to 1.3, then decreases. Think we've hit the useful low ne limit. Now try to get some high ne (and nu*) ponts by returning to shot 17, puffing into H-mode. |
| Apr 7 2005 05:04:27:220PM | 1050407024 | Amanda Hubbard | Fizzle |
| Apr 7 2005 04:53:24:927PM | 1050407025 | Amanda Hubbard | Disrupts 0.2 secs. Big injection starting at 0.11 |
| Apr 7 2005 05:07:54:897PM | 1050407028 | Kamiya | QC-mode is visible |
| Apr 7 2005 05:11:42:590PM | 1050407028 | Amanda Hubbard | Even better shot. Target density 9e19 m-2, puffing into H-modes, 0.78-1.3 secs (via ne feedback).
Five H-modes. D-alpha level is rising, rate of ne rise decreasing, as ne progresses. The QC mode does get stronger, as we hoped! Looking as EDAish as anything I've seen this campaign. Got high ne than previous, nel to 1.65e20, nebar to 3.5e20, RF up to 3 MW, still some trips but better. Gives up at 1.05 sec (then L-mode). That's all folks - thanks |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Apr 7 2005 08:43:34:803AM | Steve Wolfe | Setting up for 1050407 - MP#397 (pre-boronization exploitation) Import seg2 from 1040416019 call_alg on ZCUR (2 & 3), CLEARIN, IP change title to "JFT2-M shape" Change density to nl04=9e19 copy A-coil waveform from seg3 (start at .2sec,to 2000@0.6sec) change DC level on Chopper voltage from 100V to 0V Import seg1 from 1050406005 PG4 is 20ms; leave it for now. Earl reduced the PG3 level between 35ms and .1s to 55-50V; put it back up to 80V until .075s Change final chopper voltage from 150V to 0. Touch wire2 in seg1 to fix timestamp Load at 7-Apr-2005 07:21:57.00 Open tree /home/wolfe/pcs_scratch -1 Open tree done | |
| Apr 7 2005 09:12:54:910AM | 1050407001 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#1: Cycle test. Successful. Gas puff seems to have been too big, got .062mTorr . Plenum was at 6.7psi, but that's not enough to explain it. Have them pump it down to 6psi and see what happens on the first real shot. |
| Apr 7 2005 09:17:22:480AM | 1050407001 | Steve Wolfe | There is a problem with the crowbar circuit on J4, so we're starting the day with only D&E. It may take a two hour turnaround to get J back on the air, later in the day. |
| Apr 7 2005 09:31:00:510AM | 1050407002 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#2: Plasma attempt plasma full length. Got H-modes. nl04 is a little low. shape is pretty close. q95~3.2 instead of 3.4 rxl is a little more positive, and top is a little high Tweak up shape. ECDC 5 minutes |
| Apr 7 2005 09:43:45:333AM | 1050407003 | Steve Wolfe |
Shot#3: RXL=-.045 from -.04
ZXU= .08 from .07
nl04 to 1e20
Plasma full length. RF having some faults.
qpsi=3.2, Could stand a little bit more off the top.
Jerry will move fiber locations for edge TS.
|
| Apr 7 2005 10:12:21:230AM | 1050407004 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#4: RXU out by .01 (-.015 from -.025) RXL in by another 5mm to -.050 TF_CURRENT to 150kA from 147. Tweak startup RCUR waveform to start 1cm in (.65 from .66) to try to deal with runaways. Plasma full length. q is still too low, ~3.25-3.3 Shape looks pretty good, maybe a tiny bit high all around Runaways still bad. |
| Apr 7 2005 10:31:45:487AM | 1050407005 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#5: No ECDC this time, some problem with PEI plc setup. Ip from .96 to .92e6 to try to get q closer raise Pg3 puff in seg 1 to 100V Plasma full length. q=3.3 to 3.35, shape looks good, could use another 20kA off Runaways still bad. |
| Apr 7 2005 10:52:46:160AM | 1050407006 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#6: Ip from 920 to 900kA Program RCUR further in in seg1: Start at .63 until 10msec then out to .64 Plasma full length. q=3.4 next shot: up in density by 0.2e20 |
| Apr 7 2005 11:34:06:057AM | 1050407007 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#7: nl04 from 1.0 to 1.2e20, add some pg3 maintenance level rcur offset from 2500 to 3000 (still working on runaways) plasma full length, density still low? Did I forget to load? No it just needs more gas to get there. Try raising the pre-program by 40V Long delay for RF work in power room ECDC back on now. |
| Apr 7 2005 11:50:55:133AM | 1050407008 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#8: nl04 from 1.0 to 1.2e20, add some pg3 maintenance level Raise pg3 maintenance pre-program by 40V to 65V Plasma disrupted at 1.5sec Looks like it actually got to 1.2e20 but only after .75sec No rf. EF3 is seems to be on the rail after 1.3sec, although it only reads 11kA instead of 12kA; outer gap went to zero before the disruption. Raise Ef3 current limit to 15kA Ask for density to come up faster and hope it doesn't marfe |
| Apr 7 2005 12:07:30:033PM | 1050407009 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#9: Raise Ef3 current limit to 15kA Ask for density to come up faster and hope it doesn't marfe plasma, but did get a marfe, and it disrupted at 1.55 too much density early. This time oh2u railed, causing loss of vertical control and disruption. Startup is getting a little dicey, and no real progress on runaways Back off on density demand. |
| Apr 7 2005 12:16:50:117PM | 1050407010 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#10: nl04 to 1.0e20, leave pg3 pre-program, put early target back down lower to avoid marfe fizzle. breakdown a little later, slow current rise, bz may be creeping up. No pcs changes, just run it around again (no ECDC this time) |
| Apr 7 2005 12:33:14:907PM | 1050407011 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#11: nl04 to 1.0e20, leave pg3 pre-program, put early target back down lower to avoid marfe plasma full length, nl04=1e20 as requested, rf not too happy, some brief h-modes startup still a little hesitation. next shot: same density, rf will try to tune |
| Apr 7 2005 12:43:13:230PM | 1050407012 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#12:initial seg2 pg3 point to 40V ef4 from -1325 to -1335 No tf => No plasma Once more, with feeling! |
| Apr 7 2005 12:58:50:323PM | 1050407013 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#13:initial seg2 pg3 point to 40V ef4 from -1325 to -1335 Plasma full length, h-modes. Still trying to get rf to match. Bz came down, but there's still a hesitation. Put rcur offset back to 2500A-m |
| Apr 7 2005 01:23:32:790PM | 1050407014 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#14: Rcur offset back to 2500 Plasma full length, h-modes ECE gate valve closed RF trying, but not staying on very well startup still not great; still have hards. next shot: lower density to 9e19 |
| Apr 7 2005 01:40:56:607PM | 1050407015 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#15: NL04 to 9e19, no startup tweaks plasma, full length, got 9e19, J seems a litle happier D&E still faulting Startup a little better (did nothing) still lots of runaways. next shot: Wookie trying to improve match on D |
| Apr 7 2005 01:55:20:400PM | 1050407016 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#16: Increase gap. reduce rcur by .0015m to .6625 plasma full length, outer gap is bigger, swinging less. E still faulting, other RF is happy. Startup better again (still doing nothing), Still getting runaways though. One more shot with more power (we hope) |
| Apr 7 2005 02:04:35:107PM | 1050407017 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#17: No pcs changes plasma full length, multiple h-modes next shot: nl04 down to 7e19 |
| Apr 7 2005 02:29:52:580PM | 1050407018 | Steve Wolfe | shot#18: nl04 from 9 to 7e19, pg3 maint. level from ~60 to 30V seg1 pg4 from 20 to 22msec Plasma full length, got the density, D&J stayed on, E faulting. Type III's or dithers? Looks better than before, hotter at least. Still have runaways, startup looks ok. next shot: More power |
| Apr 7 2005 02:44:37:330PM | 1050407019 | Steve Wolfe | shot#19: No pcs changes plasma full length, no flickers Wmhd higher ~107kJ, 3MW steady from the RF startup a little hesitant on this one next shot: go for 4MW |
| Apr 7 2005 03:04:26:320PM | 1050407020 | Steve Wolfe | shot#20: Drop pg4 back to 20ms plasma full length, not as steady 4MW but not staying on. still hesitation in startup. Bz does seem to be creeping up again. next shot: ef4 10A more negative nl04 to 5e19 |
| Apr 7 2005 03:21:37:797PM | 1050407021 | Steve Wolfe | shot#21: ef4 10A more negative nl04 to 5e19, pg3 maint. level to 10V from 30V plasma full length, got an h-mode (or maybe a few hundred of them?), slowly increasing density through the RF pulse; Prf=3MW steady. Wmhd~112MW, Prad~1.7. Te(8) up to 800eV. Neutron rate above 1.5e13. No ECDC after this one (wouldn't turn on) Lower density on next shot |
| Apr 7 2005 03:38:18:297PM | 1050407022 | Steve Wolfe | shot#22: nl04 to 4e19, pg3 maint to 0.0 Disrupted at 0.8sec, big injection? RF was at 4MW steady right to the end. Possible locked mode at 0.81, but halpha has already started up at 0.80sec next shot: Go back to #17 and puff into H-mode to raise density, and collisionality |
| Apr 7 2005 03:49:59:790PM | 1050407023 | Steve Wolfe | shot#23: reload seg2 from #17 and ask for 2e20 between .75s and 1.3sec, so it will puff into the H-mode No change to startup fizzle. Should probably have dropped the fill after the disruption CIII light more than doubled. next shot: try again |
| Apr 7 2005 04:04:22:153PM | 1050407024 | Steve Wolfe | shot#24: target nl04=9e19 and ask for 2e20 between .78s and 1.3sec, (slight change in waveform from 23) so it will puff into the H-mode No change to startup, but ECDC after the fizzle. Another fizzle. CIII still high. next shot: No ecdc, lower pre-puff |
| Apr 7 2005 04:26:25:317PM | 1050407025 | Steve Wolfe | shot#25: No ecdc, pg4 from 20 to 18ms Early disruption? .22sec. Startup looks ok, but gets hit with something. May also have some current rise MHD. |
| Apr 7 2005 04:36:05:987PM | 1050407026 | Steve Wolfe | shot#26: ecdc for 5minutes, no pcs changes Still trying to get to puff into the H-mode Just the same. Short disruption at 0.2sec but in trouble at 0.2 sec. next shot: reduce seg1 pg3 puff by factor of 2 and the first point in seg2 to 32V |
| Apr 7 2005 04:54:07:617PM | 1050407027 | Steve Wolfe | shot#27: ecdc for 5minutes, reduce seg1 pg3 puff by factor of 2 and the first point in seg2 to 32V plasma to 1.7sec. Didn't stay in H-mode long. Got the puff into the H-mode, RF tripped out though. next shot: repeat? |
| Apr 7 2005 05:11:36:870PM | 1050407028 | Steve Wolfe | shot#28: ecdc for 5minutes, slow down density demand in H-mode to .85sec for 1.7e20 plasma to 1.7sec, bite out of the current around .65sec, but it recovered. Density rising until 1.05sec, then RF trips off for good (or ill) Actually E stays onm but we lose the h-mode. Better than 27, not wonderful. Probably got the high edge collisionality case; Te(8) down to 400eV. End of run. |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 08:56:43:837AM | Test | Ok | |
| 2 | 09:19:31:350AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 09:36:57:403AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 10:01:34:557AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 10:23:49:410AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 10:48:13:467AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 11:04:28:763AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 11:39:40:540AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 11:55:08:723AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 12:12:10:113PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 12:24:47:540PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 12:40:57:183PM | Plasma | Bad | No TF Supply Current |
| 13 | 12:53:16:900PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 01:13:56:373PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 01:29:06:617PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 01:46:18:370PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 02:02:39:610PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 02:18:16:967PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 02:37:10:947PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 02:52:17:030PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 03:09:54:770PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 03:24:32:673PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 03:46:07:897PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 04:01:17:007PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 04:13:47:990PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 04:30:12:760PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 04:46:59:140PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 05:03:11:017PM | Plasma | Ok | |