Alcator C-Mod Run 1050412 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:296
Date Filed: 5/14/2001
Title:Confirmation of Thomson scattering density calibration using electron cyclotron emission cutoffs
First Author:Jerry Hughes
Session Leader:Kirill Zhurovich (shots 21-32)
Miniproposal:419
Date Filed: 4/8/2005
Title:Fiducial wall pumping measurements for comparing operating conditions
First Author:Bruce Lipschultz
Session Leader:Bruce Lipschultz (shots 12-20)
Miniproposal:420
Date Filed: 4/8/2005
Title:Developing and applying a relative B density measurement
First Author:Bruce Lipschultz
Session Leader:Bruce Lipschultz (shots 1-11)

Operators
Session leader(s):Bruce Lipschultz,Bruce Lipschultz,Kirill Zhurovich
Physics operator(s):Jim Irby
Engineering operator(s):Bill Cochran,Sam Pierson,Ed Fitzgerald

Engineering Operator Run Comment
MP#420, MP#419, MP#296

Session Leader Plans
Entered: Apr 10 2005 11:14:11:457PM
Author: Bruce Lipschultz
There are 2 MPs for this half day

MP # 420 'Developing and applying a relative B density measurement'

Goals: We need some measure of the level of B in discharges. This will enable comparison of various operating conditions and across operating periods. If the diagnostic measurement proves viable then we need a set of comparison shots that can be compared across operational periods. We want measurements in both RF heated and Ohmic discharges. We have data from the RF-heated discharges (1050406004-10) and hope that the data are sufficient there. This run will concentrate on Ohmic plasmas. Monitor the B density through several measurements:
1) Background intrinsic BII and BV brightnesses
2) CXRS measurements of the relative change in the level of BV normalized to the injected D2

Diagnostics - Chromex spectrograph tuned to 486, nm. Need NINJA puff of D2 for the CXRS measurements

Setup: Ninja to 8 PSI, puffs at 0.45 (0.2 seconds) and 1,1 seconds.

Plasma - 1 MA or so (1050406010), but without RF, no gate valve closure, BUT reduce nl04 to 0.7 or so.

Shots
1. Set up shot as specified and adjust to lowish density that can be achieved without difficulty (2 shots)
2. Increase nl04 shot by shot, in increments of 0.2 up to 1.4 or so (4-6 shots)

MP # 419 'Fiducial wall pumping measurements for comparing operating conditions'

Goals: The level of wall pumping is an important factor in predicting and understanding the operation of a cryopump in C-Mod. Understanding wall pumping and its dependence on wall conditions (bare Mo or B layer, new boronization vs oldā?¦) will have important implications for predicting the operation of an experiment like ITER. We need to record data for both Ohmic and RF-heated plasmas. We accumulated some data on 1050406 (shots 26-31). The plan today is to do the Ohmic part.

Diagnostics - MKS baratron gauges. Chromex tuned for BV CXRS line (no NINJA puffing)

Setup: Gate valves closed

Plasma - 1 MA or so (1050406010 or better still, 30), but without RF.

Shots
1. Set up shot as specified and adjust to lowish density that can be achieved without difficulty (2 shots)
2. Increase nl04 shot by shot, in increments of 0.2 up to 1.4 or so (4-6 shots)

If time remains then go back to first part and add RF.
Entered: Apr 11 2005 07:30:51:277PM
Author: Kirill Zhurovich
Run plan for 1050412C (second half of the day):
MP# 296 'TS/ECE density calibration'

Configure GPC, GPC2 for 4T operation
No RF
L-mode operation, avoid getting ohmic H-modes

Start with 1050330013:
Bt=4 T
Ip=0.86MA
LSN
nl up to 2e20
Try to optimize gas puff to reach ECE critical density values (~2e20 of nl4 value)
for all ECE channels before the end of discharge

In case we have problems getting all necessary cutoffs we might consider lowering B-field a bit.
The good candidate is 1030502010:
Bt=3.7 T
Ip=0.75 MA
LSN
nl up to 2e20

In case of getting ohmic H-modes we might consider inner wall limited discharges

If we have cutoffs for all ECE channels early enough during the discharge we can try increasing
magnetic field after that to have ECE signal back (cutons) and have more data for the same shot
(exact timing and rate of B-field increase will be estimated during the earlier part of the run)

Physics Operators Plans
Entered: Apr 12 2005 07:40:07:907AM
Author: Jim Irby
Engineering Setup for Run 1050412 in support of:

MP#420 Boron Density measurement

MP#419 Fiducial wall pumping measurements

MP#296 TS/ECE density calibration

Overnight ECDC, bake at 60C

Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 17:00 (EDT)

Power systems as on 1050406010

Density request to 7e19/m^2 to start

A-coil in standard configuration (+Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot)
C-coil Start=0.3sec, Invert=2.0sec

ICRF in run on by 8:30

******
A data system cycle test should be performed by 08:15 with the
gas system enabled
******

Gas setup:
fill B-top 6psi D2 Hybrid Enabled (PG4)
fill B-side lower 1psi Argon Hybrid Enabled (PG1)
leave B-side Upper alone Hybrid DISABLED (PG2)
fill B-main 30psi D2 Hybrid Enabled (PG3)

NINJA 8 psi D2

Enable: ECE, VUV, Z-bolo shutter

Machine gatevalves will be left open at the beginning of the run but
may be toggled later in the run.

Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Apr 12 2005 05:56:50:920PM
Author: Kirill Zhurovich
Run summary for MP #296: "TS/ECE density calibration"

Session leader : Kirill Zhurovich
Physics Operator : Jim Irby

Second half of the day - shots 21-32

Aim: get ECE cutoff data at different radii, so that later it will be possible to derive density
calibration coefficients for TS from the calculated critical density values for ECE

Low magnetic field (~4T): since it's easier to get cutoffs at lower Btor
L-mode : to avoid abrupt cutoffs at the edge during L-H transition and avoid TS timing issues

Results:
Very productive run. The machine ran very well.
Got multiple cutoffs at different radii, essantially covering the whole profile.
We found that to get cutoffs in the center of the plasma we need to puff earlier and harder.
This produces cutoffs at the edge before we reach flattop phase of the discharge.
In order to get cutoffs at the very edge during flattop phase gas puff needs to be delayed.
We did a couple of shots for ECE calibration (at Amanda's request). Those produced multiple H-modes
with abrupt cutoffs across the plasma. These cutoffs will possibly be useful, but require special analysis.
For details of each particular shot, see SL comments during the run.
Entered: Apr 13 2005 11:20:08:007AM
Author: Bruce Lipschultz
MP # 420 'Developing and applying a relative B density measurement'

Goals: We need some measure of the level of B in discharges. This will enable comparison of various operating conditions and across operating periods. If the diagnostic measurement proves viable then we need a set of comparison shots that can be compared across operational periods. We want measurements in both RF heated and Ohmic discharges. We have data from the RF-heated discharges (1050406004-10) and hope that the data are sufficient there. This run will concentrate on Ohmic plasmas. Monitor the B density through several measurements:
1) Background intrinsic BII and BV brightnesses
2) CXRS measurements of the relative change in the level of BV normalized to the injected D2

Ninja was puffed twice during the sshot to allow CXRS measurements.
Plasma - 1 MA of the MP417 type (e.g. 1050406010), but without RF so that we can evaluate the B levels without RF

Shots
1. Set up shot as specified and adjust to lowish density that can be achieved without difficulty (2 shots)
2. Increase nl04 shot by shot, in increments of 0.2 up to 1.4 or so (4-6 shots)

We got a good range in density - nl04 = 0.45 - 1.5e20. The evaluation of the B data will have to await fitting of the lines but there appeared to be reasonable signal.

There was an odd shot where the plasma went into H-mode (shot 5). The radiated power seemd very low all during the shots included.
The NINJA puff was moved later on shot 7 to allow for more period of the shot in equilibrium (intrinsic B) before the active CXRS.

Shots to analyze:
shot nl04
3 0.7 - 0.85 (gas puff left on during mid-shot)
5 0.7-0.8
6 0.85
7 1.0
8 1.2
9 1.4-1.5
10 0.7 - 0.8
11 0.5



Entered: Apr 13 2005 11:20:14:710AM
Author: Bruce Lipschultz
MP # 419 'Fiducial wall pumping measurements for comparing operating conditions'

Goals: The level of wall pumping is an important factor in predicting and understanding the operation of a cryopump in C-Mod. Understanding wall pumping and its dependence on wall conditions (bare Mo or B layer, new boronization vs old) will have important implications for predicting the operation of an experiment like ITER. We need to record data for both Ohmic and RF-heated plasmas. We accumulated some data on 1050406 (shots 26-31). The plan today is to do the Ohmic part.

Gate valves closed & 1 MA of the MP417 type (e.g. 1050406010), but without RF.
Increase nl04 shot by shot, in increments of 0.2 up to 1.4 or so.

We got a reasonable range in density. In previous runs, which did not go to low density (nl04=0.4), the wall pumping increased as we went to low density. In general the increase was monotonic. The data obtained today was very surprising in that the wall pumping was essentially zero at the lowest densities. At nl04 = 0.8 there was a quantum change to 17 Tl or so. There was a general decrease in wall pumping, going to higher densities, as had been recorded before.

One potential reason for the variability of the pumping (much large than seen before) could be how much of a disruption occured on the preceeding shot during current rampdown. I have included the plasma current levels at the disruption with the other shot information below. The size of the disruption could be affecting the next shot. An example is the large disruption on shot 15 could be increasing the wall pumping on shot 16. Likewise, the lack of a disruption on 16 leads to less wall pumping on 17. The problem is that the disruption on 14, similar to that on 15, leads to no pumping on 15.

Another explanation of variation of the pumping is the amount of hard x-rays on a given shot (suggested by Marmar), I am not sure how to convert the level of HXRs measured to evaporation of Mo and subsequent pumping. So, for now, this remains a possibility but difficult to substantiate.

Lastly, the question of why the pumping changes abruptly at nl04=0.8 could have another explanation. Certainly, if one looks at the divertor parameters, the divertor temperatures are high (40-50 eV) before nl04=0.8, corresponding to a sheath-limited condition. At higher densities the plasma moves to a high recycling condition. The fluxes to divertor surfaces go up exponentially in the transition from sheath-limited to high-recycling and continue in that fashion until detachment. Perhaps the change, and increase, in fluxes is leading to the change in wall pumping?

Shots:

shots nl04(e20) wall pumping (Torr-l) disruption current
14 0.4 0.13 550 kA
15 0.64 1.0 620 kA
16 0.8 16.9 0
17 1.0 5.5 130
18 1.2 10.9 200
19 1.45 8.2 560
20 1.4 10.1

Physics Operator Summaries
Entered: Apr 12 2005 05:28:09:797PM
Author: Jim Irby
Very good run day from the operations standpoint. We had 100%
startup; no duds or fizzles. No tweaks of fields or prefill were
required. Startup fields, h_alpha, and other parameters were shot
after shot overlays. Impurity levels as seen on the RGA (m/q 46,27,48,
49, 60) were very low, probably because we have not had much ICRF for
several days. There is very little increase in mass 18, 20, or 28
following a discharge. Still having problems with neuts/hards. This
problem may go away after boroninzation, but at this point adding
early gas does not cure the problem. H/(H+D) got below 2% today in
some of the very high density shots.

We had several shots with good elm-free h-modes today (05,29,30).

We took two cycle tests before the run to make sure the data system,
gas, cameras, etc, were functioning properly, but still had failures
of daq server and/or highway on three shots.


Tests 01,02

Daq probem 04,12,13

Duds

Fizzles

Plasmas 03,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,14,15,
16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,
26,27,28,29,30,31,32

Session Leader Comments
Apr 12 2005 09:20:36:610AM1050412003Bruce Lipschultzshot went well. Need to get rid of gas puff at around 0.9 s that was left over from the reload of the shot from the other day. Take again.
Apr 12 2005 09:38:03:233AM1050412004Bruce Lipschultzcamac problem of some sort
Apr 12 2005 09:47:12:187AM1050412004Bruce Lipschultzcamac problem of some sort
Apr 12 2005 09:49:34:297AM1050412005Bruce Lipschultznl04 of 7-8 e19. H-mode at around 1.2 seconds!!?? Take it I guess
H~1.38, H/(H+D) ~ 3-4%
Apr 12 2005 10:17:17:873AM1050412006Bruce Lipschultznl04 of 8.5 e19.
H/(H+D) ~ 4%
keep raising density
Apr 12 2005 10:16:54:123AM1050412007Bruce Lipschultznl04 of 1.0e20.
H/(H+D) ~ 3.3%
keep raising density
Apr 12 2005 10:41:04:250AM1050412008Bruce Lipschultznl04 of 1.2e20.
Note that the 2 Pi diode and the foil array are reading similar values for radiated power and the divertor is probably radiating strongly. Also note that the radiated powers are VERY low ~ 15-20% radiated power fraction.
H/(H+D) ~ 3.2%
keep raising density
Apr 12 2005 10:58:26:763AM1050412009Bruce Lipschultznl04 of 1.4e20 and rising.

H/(H+D) ~ 2.4%
lower density back to start to recover that and prepare for next mp
Apr 12 2005 11:08:41:030AM1050412010Bruce Lipschultznl04 of 0.7-0.8e20

H/(H+D) ~ 4%
lower density but try try for lower still
Apr 12 2005 11:26:59:047AM1050412011Bruce Lipschultznl04 of 0.5e20

H/(H+D) ~ 5%
good shot. On the next mp
Apr 12 2005 12:04:51:907PM1050412013Bruce LipschultzCAMAC issue no plasma
Apr 12 2005 12:51:50:390PM1050412014Bruce LipschultzGate valve closed

nl04 ~4.5 e19

H/(H+D) ~ 4%

10.07 tl in
9.94 Tl remaining after shot

Mass 4: 8e-7
Mass 3: 8.8 e-8
Mass 1: 1.e-8

ISP on for 3 sweeps
Apr 12 2005 12:51:10:530PM1050412015Bruce LipschultzGate valve closed

nl04 ~6.4 e19

H/(H+D) ~ 4.1%

12.6 tl in
11.6 Tl remaining after shot

Mass 4: 1.e-6
Mass 3: 1.2-7
Mass 1: 1.25e-8
Apr 12 2005 12:49:40:640PM1050412016Bruce LipschultzGate valve closed

nl04 ~8 e19

H/(H+D)~4.2%

27.7 tl in
10.83 Tl remaining after shot

Mass 4: 9.8e-7
Mass 3: 8.3e-8
Mass 1: 1.1e-8
Apr 12 2005 12:50:34:720PM1050412017Bruce LipschultzGate valve closed

nl04 1.e20

H/(H+D) ~ 3.5%

27.7 tl in
22.23 Tl remaining after shot

Mass 4: 2.e-6
Mass 3: 1.2e-7
Mass 1: 1.7e-8
Apr 12 2005 01:04:16:470PM1050412018Bruce LipschultzGate valve closed

nl04 1.2e20

H/(H+D) ~ 3.0%

43.4 tl in
32.5 Tl remaining after shot

Mass 4: 3.e-6
Mass 3: 1.3e-7
Mass 1: 2.2e-8

224KA at disruption
Apr 12 2005 01:22:06:157PM1050412019Bruce LipschultzGate valve closed

nl04 1.4-1.5e20

H/(H+D) ~ 2.5%

60.3 tl in
52.1 Tl remaining after shot

Mass 4: 4.6e-6
Mass 3: 1.7e-7
Mass 1: 3.2e-8

560KA at disruption (20 kJ)
Apr 12 2005 07:29:08:720PM1050412020Bruce LipschultzGate valve closed

nl04 1.4e20

Early MARFE

H/(H+D) ~ 2.7%

43.9 tl in
33.8 Tl remaining after shot

Mass 4: 3.e-6
Mass 3: 1.1e-7
Mass 1: 2.2e-8

460KA at disruption (17 kJ)
Apr 12 2005 02:09:11:077PM1050412021Kirill ZhurovichEarly disruption
Some cutoffs before we reached flattop phase,
some of them inside plasma but very abrupt
most of cutoffs outside plasma

For next shot derease and/or delay gas puffing
Apr 12 2005 02:26:31:500PM1050412022Kirill ZhurovichGood cutoff data for R ~ 70-85 cm
Channels at 67 and 87 cm are marginal
Apr 12 2005 02:44:38:437PM1050412023Kirill ZhurovichGood cutoffs for R ~ 70-87 cm
ECE Channels 1 and 9 are marginal

Next: increase Bt from 3.9 to 4 T (move ECE channels ~1.5cm outside)
Apr 12 2005 03:08:00:000PM1050412024Kirill ZhurovichCutoffs for R ~72-86 cm (ch1 is close)

Next: try to increase the density to get Ch1 cutoff
and current to make it possible and to shift Ch1 a bit outward
Apr 12 2005 03:24:11:750PM1050412025Kirill ZhurovichGood cutoffs for R ~ 69-86 cm
Central channel has a clear cutoff (at least 1)
Nexh shot : repeat for the central channel
Apr 12 2005 03:50:31:610PM1050412026Kirill ZhurovichCutoffs for R ~ 68-87 cm

Next: decrease and delay gas puff - focus on edge channels
Apr 12 2005 04:04:58:560PM1050412027Kirill ZhurovichECE cutoffs during flatttop phase for R ~ 75-86 cm
No TS data!
Next: repeat the shot with Bt 4T --> 4.05T to shift ECE channels a bit outward
Apr 12 2005 04:26:34:170PM1050412029Kirill ZhurovichSupposed to be non-cutoff shot for Amanda's calibration
Got multiple H-modes with brief cutoffs at the edge
Apr 12 2005 04:44:53:157PM1050412030Kirill ZhurovichNo-cutoff shot for Amanda's calibration
2 brief H-modes with rapid cutoffs/cutons across the whole profile
Apr 12 2005 05:01:07:763PM1050412031Kirill ZhurovichCutoffs for R ~ 76.7 - 85 cm
The most desired Ch.7 at R ~ 87.7cm did not get cutoff

Next shot: same bt, puff harder
Apr 12 2005 05:11:52:983PM1050412032Kirill ZhurovichCutoffs for R ~ 73.5 - 85.5 cm
Ch.7 at 87.7 cm is marginal again (more detailed analysis is needed)

Physics Operator Comments
Apr 11 2005 05:36:20:450PM1050412001Jim IrbyLoaded shot 1050406010 into segment 2

set nl_04 request to 0.7e20/m^2
Apr 12 2005 09:17:43:843AM1050412003Jim Irbyplasma into rampdwon

still had gas puff for h-mode starting around 0.8 s --- PO error
Apr 12 2005 09:39:25:000AM1050412004Jim Irbyno power shot --- data system meltdown

Apr 12 2005 09:49:37:750AM1050412005Jim Irbyjosh thinks data system okay --- try for plasma

plasma into rampdown --- elm free h-mode!

h-factor 1.36

h/(h+d) abt 4%



Apr 12 2005 10:04:07:437AM1050412006Jim Irbynl_04 request from 0.7 to 0.9 e20 /m^2

added a little early gas to damp hards --- didn't help

plasma into rampdown

h/(h+d) 4 %

Apr 12 2005 10:26:06:013AM1050412007Jim Irbynl_04 request to 1.1e20/m^2

added more early gas to damp hards

plasma into rampdown

neuts/hards out of saturation

h/(h+d) < 4%


Apr 12 2005 10:40:49:843AM1050412008Jim Irbynl_04 request to 1.3e20 /m^2

added 2 mm to clearin at .3 s in an attempt to keep us off the wall during crossover

plasma into rampdown

left gap still going to zero at 0.36 s

h/(h+d) 3% at 1 s

neuts and hards still okay
Apr 12 2005 10:55:17:420AM1050412009Jim Irbynl_04 request to 1.5e20 /m^2

added 2 mm to left gap at .258 s

plasma into rampdown --- density ramping up during shot --- should have brought it up sooner




Apr 12 2005 11:06:46:890AM1050412010Jim Irbynl_04 request to 0.7e20 /m^2

plasma into rampdown

some lh injections after 1.45 s

Apr 12 2005 11:21:14:250AM1050412011Jim Irbydensity request to 5e19/m^2

plasma into rampdown
Apr 12 2005 11:42:59:763AM1050412012Jim Irbyrepeat density but with gatevalves toggling closed for 5 minutes

another daq meltdown
Apr 12 2005 11:49:32:577AM1050412013Jim Irbytry again

daq meltdown --- Joe, Yuri, Josh, Tom all working on the problem
Apr 12 2005 12:09:33:703PM1050412014Jim Irbyanother try --- problem has been camac server 2, highway 4 --- looks fine now

plasma into rampdown

gatevalves toggling --- pressure 8.3e-4 Torr drifting up to 8.5e-4 after shot
Apr 12 2005 12:23:45:013PM1050412015Jim Irbynl_04 request to 7e19/m^2

increased early gas a little to damp run-aways --- low density operation providing less off walls?

plasma into rampdown

neuts/hards a little better

Apr 12 2005 12:31:42:140PM1050412016Jim Irbynl_04 density request to 9e19/m^2

plasma into rampdown

Apr 12 2005 12:44:44:483PM1050412017Jim Irbynl_04 request to 1.1e20/m^3

good shot

Apr 12 2005 12:58:58:030PM1050412018Jim Irbynl_04 request to 1.3e20/m^3 --- delayed density rampdown from 1.2 to 1.4 s

density into rampdown

Apr 12 2005 04:32:24:827PM1050412019Jim Irbynl_04 to 1.5e20 /m ^2

disrupted at 1.7 s, 560 kA --- extended gas puff?

Apr 12 2005 01:30:20:610PM1050412020Jim Irbystarted density rampdown at 1.15 s
nl_04 request to 1.4e20/m^3

plasma, but large marfe --- density rise too fast?

last shot for Bruce....
Apr 12 2005 02:10:16:763PM1050412021Jim Irbyswitching to mp296 --- Thomson calibration


cell access to tweak TCI, change LH boards

loaded shot 1050330013 into segment 3

nl_04 density request 2.5e20/m^3 --- rampdown starting at 1.2 s

disruption at .69 s

density rise too fast --- some cutoffs observed
Apr 12 2005 02:26:03:657PM1050412022Jim Irbydropped density rate of rise. Try reach 2e20 /m^3 well after 0.7 s

density for 1.86 s

Thomson/ECE people seem happy

Apr 12 2005 02:47:03:373PM1050412023Jim Irbyadded a little more early gas --- repeat otherwise

good plasma --- 1.56 s

neuts/hards high again??

Apr 12 2005 02:59:15:110PM1050412024Jim IrbyBt from 3.9 to 4T (105 to 107.7 ka)

plasma for 1.53 s

Apr 12 2005 03:29:14:733PM1050412025Jim Irbyincreased density rate of rise before 400 ms --- trying to get a little more density
increased Ip request from 900 to 925 kA with a ramp to 930 kA

h/(h+d) below 2% on last shot

plasma for 1.53 s

got slight increase in nl_04 over last shot

got a little more current

h/(h+d) 1.7%

Apr 12 2005 03:45:30:327PM1050412026Jim Irbyrepeat

plasma for 1.47 s

Apr 12 2005 04:03:10:750PM1050412027Jim Irbyloaded seg 3 of 1050412024 into seg 3

dropped density request before 0.8 s

plasma for 1.68 s
Apr 12 2005 04:15:58:093PM1050412028Jim IrbyBt from 4.0 to 4.05 T

plasma for 1.67 s

Apr 12 2005 04:31:49:500PM1050412029Jim Irbynl_04 request to 7e19/m^2

dropped Bt from 4.05 to 3.8 T

plasma for 1.67 s

elm-free h-modes
Apr 12 2005 04:42:13:187PM1050412030Jim Irbynl_04 request to 9e19/m^2

Btor to 3.9 from 3.8 T

still had h-modes after 1.06 s

Apr 12 2005 04:52:11:203PM1050412031Jim Irbyloaded seg 3 from 1050412028 into seg 3

Btor to 4.1 T

plasma for 1.67 s


Apr 12 2005 05:10:08:030PM1050412032Jim Irbyraised density request from 1.2 to 1.5 e20 before 0.8 s
raised density ramp after .8 s

early gas puff started at 19 ms from 20 ms

good shot ---- 1.56 s

now it can be said --- 100% startup today

neuts/hards better maybe because of gas

Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
107:18:27:220AMTestOkShot Cycle Test
207:28:12:047AMTestOkShot Cycle Test
309:03:54:817AMPlasmaOk
409:18:54:967AMPlasmaBadInit Failure-Daq Failure
509:37:56:843AMPlasmaOk
609:52:14:560AMPlasmaOk
710:07:28:063AMPlasmaOk
810:31:50:077AMPlasmaOk
910:44:39:437AMPlasmaOk
1010:57:22:000AMPlasmaOk
1111:10:32:873AMPlasmaOk
1211:28:54:170AMTestOk
1311:42:44:657AMTestOkIGOR ACK fail
1412:00:51:203PMPlasmaOk
1512:13:35:717PMPlasmaOk
1612:26:35:780PMPlasmaOk
1712:40:02:657PMPlasmaOk
1812:53:31:373PMPlasmaOk
1901:10:49:000PMPlasmaOk
2001:23:23:797PMPlasmaOk
2101:55:42:373PMPlasmaOk
2202:10:59:687PMPlasmaOk
2302:32:45:513PMPlasmaOk
2402:49:21:060PMPlasmaOk
2503:14:57:983PMPlasmaOk
2603:27:49:407PMPlasmaOk
2703:51:38:843PMPlasmaOk
2804:07:34:343PMPlasmaOk
2904:22:15:030PMPlasmaOk
3004:34:38:780PMPlasmaOk
3104:47:25:047PMPlasmaOk
3205:00:36:047PMPlasmaOk