Alcator C-Mod Run 1050620 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:296
Date Filed: 5/14/2001
Title:Confirmation of Thomson scattering density calibration using electron cyclotron emission cutoffs
First Author:Jerry Hughes
Session Leader:Kirill Zhurovich (shots 1-15)
Miniproposal:419
Date Filed: 4/8/2005
Title:Fiducial wall pumping measurements for comparing operating conditions
First Author:Bruce Lipschultz
Session Leader:Bruce Lipschultz (shots 16-35)

Operators
Session leader(s):Kirill Zhurovich,Bruce Lipschultz
Physics operator(s):Ron Parker
Engineering operator(s):Bill Cochran,Gary Dekow,Ed Fitzgerald

Engineering Operator Run Comment
MP #296 and MP #419

Session Leader Plans
Entered: Jun 20 2005 08:48:00:120AM
Author: Kirill Zhurovich
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1050616xxx KIRILL SL_PLAN Jun 15 2005 12:24:33:316PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Run plan for 1050620a (same as for 1050616):
MP #296 (revised) 'TS/ECE density calibration'

Configure GPC, GPC2 for 4T operation
No RF
L-mode operation, avoid getting ohmic H-modes

Basically repeat the run 1050412c, shots 23-28.

Start with 1050412023:
Bt=3.9 T
Ip=0.87 MA
LSN
nl up to 2e20

Magnetic field and gas puff will be optimized to get ECE cutoffs for all TS spatial channels.

Some shots will be repeated for different optical setup in TS lab.


Entered: Jun 20 2005 11:37:08:760AM
Author: Bruce Lipschultz
MP #419: 'Fiducial wall pumping measurements for comparing operating conditions'
There are several goals for this afternoon:

We are looking for 1 MA shots with densities just under nl04=1.e20. We need the shots not to disrupt through to current reaching close to zero. The amount of RF has to be constant, shot to shot.

1) see if the wall pumping is the same at this point as it was pre-titaniumization. This will require several shots. But we will be seeing if the wall pumping saturates as well. SO this will require at least 5 constant shots. The equilibrium used will be 1050610020. The amount of RF to be determined as mentioned earlier.

2) Vary the wetted area to see if that affects the pumping. We will start with LSN on the vertical target (step 1). Then move to inner wall limited (Granetz to supply shot number from last week). Finally to upper single null (shot 1050608014 for equilibrium).

3) We would also like to know if the pumping saturates with length of shots (fluence). This will require several shots at verious flattop periods varying from 0., 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 seconds. The density may be down, more like 0.85. Likely not time enough today.

Physics Operators Plans
Entered: Jun 17 2005 01:13:18:137PM
Author: Ron Parker
Run plan for Monday, 20 June 2005

MP #296 (revised) "TS/ECE Density Calibration"
MP #419 "Fiducial wall pumping measurements for comparing operating conditions"


SL: Kirill Zhurovic (MP #296), Bruce Lipschultz (MP #419)

PO: Ron Parker

Run BEGINS @ 09:00 and ENDS @ 17:00

No ECDC, bake overnight at 60C

Power systems as on 1050616002


A-coil in standard configuration (+Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot)
C-coil Start=0.3sec, Invert=2.0sec

No ICRF initially, may require for MP #419



Gas setup:
fill B-top 6psi D2 Hybrid Enabled (PG4)
fill B-side lower 1psi Argon Hybrid Enabled (PG1)
leave B-side Upper alone Hybrid DISABLED (PG2)
fill B-main 30psi D2 Hybrid Enabled (PG3)


Enable: ECE, VUV, Z-bolo shutter


Run Plan: (MP #296)

Configure GPC, GPC2 for 4T operation
No RF, L-mode operation, avoid getting ohmic H-modes

Basically repeat the run 1050412c, shots 23-28.

Start with 1050412023:
Bt=3.9 T
Ip=0.87 MA
LSN
nl up to 2e20

Magnetic field and gas puff will be optimized to get ECE cutoffs for all TS spatial channels.

Some shots will be repeated for different optical setup in TS lab.

Run Plan: (MP #419)

Load ohmic shot with 1 MA, 5.4 T, nl_04 = 0.85 (e.g., 1050610020 w/o RF)

Run discharges of varying length. Gate valves off for > 5 minutes after each shot.

Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Jun 20 2005 06:03:55:590PM
Author: Bruce Lipschultz
MP419 - 'Fiducial wall pumping measurements for comparing operating conditions'
1050620

Two pieces of information from this run:

1) Continued shot after shot repetition of the same shot did not lead quickly to saturation: If saturation of the wall is occurring it is slowly. There did appear to be some drop in pumping. But then, in the 4th shot of the sequence (20) we corrected the density dropping slightly and the wall pumping came up a bit. In the last shot of the sequence, we got an H-mode and the pumping was in line with earlier shots.

2) Changing the wetted surface led to changes in wall pumping: When we shifted the strike point off of the vertical plate to the floor (23-26) the pumping dropped by a factor of 2.5-3. When we went to USN (28-30) the pumping returned to values almost as high as with the strike point on the lower vertical plate. Unfortunately, the inner wall limited shots (32-34) were disruptive and the pumping results for those equilibria are not comparable. Certainly the density was high during those shots, above the programmed value (and the feedback gas turned off) implying that the wall was seriously outgassing during the shot. On the last shot (35) we switched to outer limited. The wall pumping was the highest of the day BUT, this shot followed several disruptions and the divertor pressures were 35 mT, almost as high as for LSN plasmas (40 mT), indicating that the plasma was not really limited. More work needed here. I should mention that when we returned to the vertical plate (shot 27) the wall pumping was the same as earlier in the run.

Lastly, the values for wall pumping with the strike point on the vertical plaate (LSN) were similar to that of 1050412 run, pre-sboronization and pre-titaniumization. So, it appears on a gross level that the wall pumping is that we are operating 'normally'.

Physics Operator Summaries
Entered: Jun 20 2005 05:17:11:303PM
Author: Ron Parker
The run had two parts, first completion of MP 296, Thomson Calibration, then continuation of MP 419 on Wall Pumping Studies.

The machine ran well for both MP's. The Thomson calibrations were completed about
half way through the run. The only difficulty encountered during the entire run was trying to avoid a disruption during rampdown for a limiter shot, the last part of MP 419. This will take some work, possibly moving the plasma to the outside limiter during rampdown.

Early in the run, there was some difficulty in getting a reliable startup. The situation was improved by a suggestion of Steve Wolfe, who recommended importing segment 1 from an optimized startup, namely shot 1050525001. From this point onward (shot 9) there were no problems with startup with one exception: shot 31 which was a full bore dud for which absolutely no reason was evident.

Scorecard: 4 fizzles, 1 dud and 29 full length plasmas.

About 10 minutes were lost due to one data system hangup, and two of the full length shots were improperly loaded (Operator Error). All in all, a successful run.

Session Leader Comments
Jun 20 2005 09:10:19:413AM1050620001Kirill ZhurovichNo plasma...
Jun 20 2005 09:29:10:060AM1050620002Kirill ZhurovichGood shot.
Got ECE cutoffs for Ch. 2-5 (R~ 70-79cm)
ECE Ch.6-8 (R ~ 82-87cm) have low signal
Jun 20 2005 09:40:18:650AM1050620003Kirill ZhurovichNo plasma
Jun 20 2005 10:01:35:550AM1050620004Kirill ZhurovichGreat shot.
Unfortunately, something went wrong: both lasers stoppped firing in the middle of the shot + both gate valves closed at 25mT
Jun 20 2005 10:06:36:640AM1050620005Kirill ZhurovichNo plasma, it's a Murphy's law...
Jun 20 2005 10:21:05:027AM1050620006Kirill ZhurovichGreat shot.
Got ECE cutoffs for Ch. 2-7 (R ~ 71.5-86.5 cm)
Jun 20 2005 10:31:59:553AM1050620007Kirill ZhurovichWe tried to delay the gas puff by ~100ms.
No plasma, unfortunately
Jun 20 2005 10:56:48:700AM1050620008Kirill ZhurovichGood shot.
Got ECE cutoffs for Ch. 2-7.
No density analysis/mapping yet due to problems with the EFIT
Jun 20 2005 10:59:34:747AM1050620008Kirill ZhurovichStart ECE calibrations for the other optical setup (no lens in front of labsphere) in TS lab
Jun 20 2005 11:17:22:097AM1050620009Kirill ZhurovichGood shot,
but no ECE signal (ECE PLC color settings confused me):(
Jun 20 2005 11:30:48:060AM1050620010Kirill ZhurovichGood shot.
Got ECE cutoffs for Ch 2-7 (R ~ 71.5-86.5 cm).
Ch.1 is marginal.
Jun 20 2005 11:41:05:057AM1050620011Kirill ZhurovichGood shot.
Got ECE cutoffs for Ch 2-7 (R ~ 70-85 cm).
Ch.1 is marginal.
Jun 20 2005 12:01:10:957PM1050620012Kirill ZhurovichGood shot.
Got ECE cutoffs for Ch 2-7 (R ~ 70-84.7 cm).
Ch.1 is marginal.
Requested a change of magnetic field from 3.9T to 3.95T
This should shift ECE channels outward by ~.75cm
Jun 20 2005 12:07:30:000PM1050620013Kirill ZhurovichGood shot.
Got ECE cutoffs for Ch 2-7 (R ~ 71-85.5 cm).
Ch.1 is marginal.
Jun 20 2005 12:20:15:153PM1050620014Kirill ZhurovichGood shot.
Got ECE cutoffs for Ch 2-7 (R ~ 70.7-85.5 cm).

Jun 20 2005 12:32:36:037PM1050620015Kirill ZhurovichGood shot.
Got ECE cutoffs for Ch 2-7 (R ~ 72.3-86.8 cm).
This is the last shot for ECE/TS calibration.
Jun 20 2005 12:53:16:450PM1050620016Bruce LipschultzStarting off with 1 MA LSN constant shots.

Fine shot, nl04=1. L-mode with 1 MW of RF


Jun 20 2005 01:12:39:180PM1050620017Bruce LipschultzFine shot, nl04=1. L-mode with 1 MW of RF

density dropping slightly after 1 second. It looks like the feedback is truned off then in anticipation of an H-mode.


Jun 20 2005 01:20:35:080PM1050620018Bruce LipschultzFine shot, nl04=1. L-mode with 1 MW of RF
Jun 20 2005 01:34:36:357PM1050620018Bruce LipschultzFine shot, nl04=1. L-mode with 1 MW of RF
Jun 20 2005 01:58:16:350PM1050620019Bruce Lipschultznl04=1. with 1 MW of RF L-mode


Jun 20 2005 01:59:25:863PM1050620020Bruce Lipschultznl04=1. with 1 MW of RF L-mode

gas puff feedback extended to 1.3 seconds


Jun 20 2005 01:57:03:817PM1050620021Bruce Lipschultznl04=1. with 1 MW of RF

Buit got an H-mode!


The wall pumping appears to be holding pretty steady, perhaps dropping a little bit. from 12 tl on shot 16 to 10 tl on shot 19. Shot 20 was back up to 11.3
Jun 20 2005 02:17:46:607PM1050620022Bruce Lipschultznl04=1. with 1 MW of RF H-mode during RF

had the lower strike point down the plate to the bottom.

Very much less pumping (see RGA entry)
Jun 20 2005 02:36:21:523PM1050620023Bruce Lipschultznl04=1. with 1 MW of RF H-mode during RF

Ohmic H-mode before RF. It seems like the H-mode threshold is dropping.

had the lower strike point on the floor.

wall outgassing instead of pumping
Jun 20 2005 02:45:42:610PM1050620024Bruce Lipschultznl04=1. strictly Ohmic - still getting H-modes

had the lower strike point on the floor.

wall pumping
Jun 20 2005 02:57:07:623PM1050620025Bruce Lipschultznl04=1. RF + Ohmic - still getting H-modes

had the lower strike point on the floor.

wall pumping
Jun 20 2005 03:12:11:960PM1050620026Bruce Lipschultznl04=1. RF + Ohmic - still getting H-modes

had the lower strike point on the floor.

wall pumping
Jun 20 2005 03:26:24:957PM1050620027Bruce Lipschultznl04=1. RF + Ohmic - still getting H-modes

had the lower strike point back on the vertical plate.

wall pumping back to that level
Jun 20 2005 03:39:09:933PM1050620028Bruce Lipschultznl04=1. RF + Ohmic no H-modes

Upper single null

pumping higher than in the lower slot, but not as much as for on the lower vertical plate
Jun 20 2005 03:50:58:913PM1050620029Bruce Lipschultznl04=1. RF + Ohmic no H-modes

Upper single null

pumping still close to that of the lower vertical plate
Jun 20 2005 04:03:35:440PM1050620030Bruce Lipschultznl04=1. RF + Ohmic no H-modes

Upper single null

pumping still close to that of the lower vertical plate

Next shot on to inner limited
Jun 20 2005 04:15:28:407PM1050620031Bruce Lipschultzdud
Jun 20 2005 04:33:32:650PM1050620032Bruce LipschultzIner wall limited.

Density too high - 1.2 and gas valve turns off at 0.4 s.

Disrupts on the rampdown at 500 kA

wall outgassing
Jun 20 2005 04:37:34:240PM1050620033Bruce LipschultzInner wall limited.

Density too high - 1.2 and gas valve turns off.

Disrupts at start of rampdown at 950 kA

wall outgassing
Jun 20 2005 04:45:00:427PM1050620033Bruce LipschultzInner wall limited.

Density too high - 1.2 and gas valve turns off.

Disrupts at start of rampdown at 950 kA

wall outgassing
Jun 20 2005 04:57:52:937PM1050620034Bruce LipschultzInner wall limited.

Density too high - 1.2 and gas valve turns off.

Disrupts at start of rampdown at 850 kA

wall outgassing
Jun 20 2005 05:56:55:230PM1050620035Bruce LipschultzOuter limited. But still observed significant divertor pressures.

Density (nl04) ~ 1.0e20

No RF

wall pumping - largest of the day. But, just after disruptions and the divertor pressures were 35 mT, almost as high as for LSN plasmas (40 mT), indicating that the plasma was not really limited. More work needed here.

Physics Operator Comments
Jun 20 2005 08:45:18:290AM1050620001Ron ParkerGood morning! Today we'll try to make up the run scheduled for last
Thursday, 6/16/06. Assuming success with the Thomson calibration, we'll
move on to wall pumping experiments.
Jun 20 2005 09:17:52:050AM1050620001Ron ParkerPatience folks, OH needs to cool a few more degrees.
Jun 20 2005 09:50:41:520AM1050620001Ron ParkerFirst shot was a fizzle, fill pressure was high, 0.2 mT.

But programmed pulse was short???

On next shot, pulse gas prefill increased by 5 ms.
Jun 20 2005 09:37:56:760AM1050620002Ron ParkerShot 002 ran OK, as programmed. Disrupts on current rampdown.

Next shot: Field during flat top increased from 3.9 to 4.0 T.
Jun 20 2005 09:43:57:087AM1050620003Ron ParkerShot 003 fizzled, breakdown a bit late and fill pressure now ~0.06 mT.

Walls loaded up aftershot 002.

For next shot, 3 ms taken off pulse gas.
Jun 20 2005 10:02:50:953AM1050620004Ron ParkerShot 004 ran, breakdown OK, but fill pressure still a bit high.

Next: reduce puff by 2 ms, also reduce Bz(0) offset by 10 A.
Jun 20 2005 10:09:14:000AM1050620005Ron ParkerShot 005 fizzled, fill gas is still a bit too high. Reduce to 16 ms gas puff.
Jun 20 2005 10:31:48:943AM1050620006Ron ParkerShot 006 ran OK, as programmed. Still disrupts on rampdown going vertically unstable.
Jun 20 2005 10:35:56:113AM1050620007Ron ParkerShot 007 fizzled. It seems that every other shot is fizzling.

No changes, see if the next shot runs.
Jun 20 2005 10:56:43:357AM1050620008Ron ParkerShot 8 ran, good breakdown, disruption now at 500 kA.

Steve suggests using an optimized startup from 1050525001 and
this is implemented on next shot.

Meanwhile, data system hung on shot 008. Short (hopefully) delay.
Jun 20 2005 05:17:52:397PM1050620009Ron ParkerShot 9 ran OK, breakdown was later, 7 ms as compared with 5 ms for previous startup. No change for next shot except to touch up Bz(0).

Data system delay was about 10 minutes
Jun 20 2005 11:34:31:200AM1050620010Ron ParkerShot 10 ran OK, breakdown back to 5 ms with EF 4 at -1300 (from -1310).

Next shot: field reset to 3.9 T from 4.0) and argon puff added at 0.3 s, for 40 ms.
Jun 20 2005 11:45:20:383AM1050620011Ron ParkerShot ran OK, breakdown early (5 ms). Still disrupting at 500 kA.

Fill pressure perhaps a tad too high, 0.05 mTorr. Reduce prefill by 1 ms.for next shot.

Gas puff delayed by another 50 ms.
Jun 20 2005 12:00:31:520PM1050620012Ron ParkerShot 012 ran OK. Next: BT increased from 3.90 to 3.95 T.
Jun 20 2005 12:13:37:233PM1050620013Ron ParkerShot 13 ran OK, but disrupted at 850 kA.

Next: Same shot.
Jun 20 2005 12:26:56:010PM1050620014Ron ParkerShot 14 ran OK. Still disrupts at 850 kA during ramp down.

Next: BT increased to 4.05 T.
Jun 20 2005 12:39:26:380PM1050620015Ron ParkerShot 015 ran OK. This ends MP 296 part of run.

Next: Begin MP 419 part of run, with shot 1050610020 loaded in segment 2.

Segment 1 remains the same as in other shots today.
Jun 20 2005 12:53:53:373PM1050620016Ron ParkerShot 016 looked good. Early startup, full rampdown to 0 current.

RF power ~ 1 MW, no H-mode.

Fill pressure could be a tad too high, 0.046 Torr

No change for next shot.
Jun 20 2005 01:21:26:473PM1050620017Ron ParkerShot 017 was a repeat of shot 016. Good shot.
Jun 20 2005 05:11:24:947PM1050620018Ron ParkerShot 018 was another fine shot, running as programmed with early breakdown
and full rampdown to ~ 0 kA.

There will be a small delay awaiting instructions from SL.
Jun 20 2005 01:33:13:263PM1050620019Ron ParkerAnother good shot. Next: Extend density flattop to 1.3 ms.
Jun 20 2005 01:49:10:120PM1050620020Ron ParkerShot 20 looked good, density flattop extended as requested.
Next: same shot, with 1 ms off gas prepuff.
Jun 20 2005 02:04:16:643PM1050620021Ron ParkerSorry folks, I know it's a bit boring.

Shot 21 ran well, essentially repeat of previous two shots.

However, fill pressure has creeped up to 0.05 mTorr and
breakdown is delayed to 10 ms. Prefill pulse reduced
to 12 ms.

We'll sweep the lower X-point 1-1.5 cm further to the inside for the next shot.
Jun 20 2005 02:16:56:013PM1050620022Ron ParkerShot 22 ran well, breakdown back to 5.5 ms and lower X-point
moved as requested.

Next: Move the X-pont further inside, ~ 0.5 to 1.0 cm.
Also changed IC EF4 to -1305.
Jun 20 2005 05:11:53:620PM1050620023Ron ParkerShot 23 ran OK.

Next: Tweak RXl a bit to keep strike point from hitting indentation on
divertor floor.
Jun 20 2005 02:41:21:473PM1050620024Ron ParkerShot 24 ran well. One more shot here and we'll switch to upper null.
Jun 20 2005 02:55:55:640PM1050620025Ron ParkerShot 25 was OK. One more shot (26) here, at same conditions.
Jun 20 2005 03:12:38:790PM1050620026Ron ParkerShot 26 ran as programmed.

Next shot: upper null, from shot 1050608014.
Jun 20 2005 03:37:31:107PM1050620027Ron ParkerSorry folks, that was not an upper null shot. Wrong segment from shot 1050608014 was used. Should be OK this time.
Jun 20 2005 03:38:20:560PM1050620028Ron ParkerOK, that was the single null shot.

But the outer gap was varying because Rcur was not constant.
Should be fixed for next shot.


Jun 20 2005 03:53:56:803PM1050620029Ron ParkerShot 29 ran OK. Continue with slight tweaking of Rcur.
Jun 20 2005 03:55:14:100PM1050620030Ron ParkerShot 30 ran OK, last upper single null shot.

Next: Limited inner wall shots, starting with 1050615022, but with 1 MA current..
Jun 20 2005 04:15:42:047PM1050620031Ron ParkerShot 31 was a dud, reason not evident.

Try again.
Jun 20 2005 04:39:01:757PM1050620032Ron ParkerShot 32 went off as programmed. Why was previous shot a dud???


Jun 20 2005 04:40:34:647PM1050620033Ron ParkerShot 33 ran but disrupted shortly after inversion in spite of attempts to
circularize it during ramp down.

For shot 34, we'll revert to reloaded shot 32.
Jun 20 2005 04:56:36:560PM1050620034Ron ParkerFor the next and last shot, shot 020 will be rerun, but clearin and Rcur will be adjusted so that the plasma will lean on the outer limiter.

Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
109:08:32:320AMPlasmaOk
209:22:20:237AMPlasmaOk
309:38:08:353AMPlasmaOk
409:50:52:100AMPlasmaOk
510:03:22:657AMPlasmaOk
610:16:03:183AMPlasmaOk
710:29:31:897AMPlasmaOk
810:42:03:050AMPlasmaOk
911:09:54:680AMPlasmaOk
1011:22:43:127AMPlasmaOk
1111:35:31:327AMPlasmaOk
1211:50:42:680AMPlasmaOk
1312:03:26:470PMPlasmaOk
1412:15:50:217PMPlasmaOk
1512:28:20:587PMPlasmaOk
1612:44:37:050PMPlasmaOk
1712:57:12:747PMPlasmaOk
1801:09:50:150PMPlasmaOk
1901:22:22:330PMPlasmaOk
2001:35:50:030PMPlasmaOk
2101:49:33:820PMPlasmaOk
2202:05:20:033PMPlasmaOk
2302:19:24:263PMPlasmaOk
2402:32:49:727PMPlasmaOk
2502:45:18:597PMPlasmaOk
2602:58:09:467PMPlasmaOk
2703:12:03:540PMPlasmaOk
2803:24:37:520PMPlasmaOk
2903:38:08:233PMPlasmaOk
3003:51:14:620PMPlasmaOk
3104:04:15:707PMPlasmaOk
3204:16:48:530PMPlasmaOk
3304:31:33:480PMPlasmaOk
3404:45:23:317PMPlasmaOk
3504:58:41:357PMPlasmaOk