| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Steve Wolfe |
| Physics operator(s): | Jim Irby |
| Engineering operator(s): | Andy Pfeiffer,Bill Byford |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| Locked mode threshold at different toroidal phase SL Wolfe PO Irby EO Pi |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Mar 15 2006 05:50:01:240PM |
| Author: Steve Wolfe |
Run plan for Fri. 17-Mar-2006
MP#402 Locked modes threshold at different toroidal phase
SL: Wolfe
PO: Irby
This run will continue the phase scan of applied non-axisymmetric
field orientation begun on 1050415. The purpose of these experiments is to improve our characterization of the C-Mod intrinsic error fields, and to investigate the dependence of the 2/1 locked mode threshold on the m=1
and m=3 sidebands.
Last April we completed one phase condition, namely
[-Bbot -Dtop +Gbot +Jtop], the so-called rotated helical configuration.
This corresponds to condition 5A of the original MP. We will start today
with the negative of this orientation, then proceed through the others
more or less in the order of the MP.
Start with A-coils connected as for 5B of the MP:
[+Bbot +Dtop -Gbot -Jtop]
phi~ +76 degrees
1) Establish shot with 1MA, 5.4T, NL04=1.15e20, Acoil off, like 1050415025.
Verify that no intrinsic locked mode occurs. If it does, raise NL04
2. A) Program A-coil current to maximum (4000A program, expect 3600A)
B) If locked mode appears on A, then reduce A-coil current to bracket
the threshold. Otherwise reduce NL04 by 10% and try again [1-3shots]
C) Set A-coil current to 1600A, trying for B21_app=4.4G. Ramp NL04 down
after 0.8 sec during shot to look for locking density (as on
1050415030). Note that A-coil program needs to be set higher than
actual value desired. The program from 1050415030 is probably a
good place to start.
3. Change A-coil taps to
[+Btop -Bbot -Gtop +Gbot]
This is the rotated quadrupole configuration, phi~ -49deg.
A) Return to density program of 2A&B. Program max A-coil current
B) If locked mode appears on 3A, then reduce A-coil current to
bracket the threshold. Otherwise reduce density 10% and try
again (if not down to intrinsic threshold already)
C) Set A-coil current to get 1660A (or whatever is needed to
get B21_app=4.4G). Program NL04 ramp-down as on 2C.
4. Reverse A-coil power supply leads, so A-coil taps setting is
[-Btop +Bbot +Gtop -Gbot]
phi=+131 deg quadrupole
A-C) Repeat the sequence of 2 and 3
5. If there is time remaining, proceed to the next case in the MP:
[+Btop +Bbot -Gtop -Gbot]
rotated dipole, phi=+38degrees
A-C) Repeat the shot sequence of the previous phases
Actually, I don't expect to be able to get a locked mode at
NL04=1.15e20 in this orientation, but we might as well try.
The A-coil current for step C (to get 4.4G) should be ~2900A
6. Reverse A-coil supply leads to give
[-Btop -Bbot +Gtop +Gbot]
rotated dipole, phi=-142deg
A-C) Repeat shot sequence of the previous phases. Program current
for step C should be same as determined for 5C to give 4.4G
It's highly unlikely we'll get this far, but if we should the next
tap setting would be a standard dipole
[+Dtop +Dbot -Jtop -Jbot]
|
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Mar 17 2006 06:10:14:127PM |
| Author: Steve Wolfe |
Run summary for 1060317 MP#402 Locked mode threshold at different toroidal phase SL: wolfe PO: Irby EO: Pfeiffer, Byford We got a number of new points on for the database, which should help refine the intrinsic error field determination. We completed steps 1-4 of the run plan, and got a solid null result on 5A/B; the locking density in configuration 5 was not determined, but it is probably more important to move on to the next configuration when we get another run day, as the rotated dipole in quad 1 ends up in a very stable region and I expect the locking density may be too low to access. 2. We started with the anti-rotated helical configuration [+Bbot +Dtop -Gbot -Jtop] which is 180deg from the configuration used on 1050415, the first half-day of this MP. We got only a lower bound on the 2e20/m^3 threshold field at |B21_app|> 10.4G at phi~ +76deg. (shot 4,5). The locking density at |B21_app|=4.7G was nebar~1.1e20/m^3 (shot 8) 3. The rotated quadrupole configuration [+Btop -Bbot -Gtop +Gbot] has phi=-49deg, essentially orthogonal to the standard configuration. For this orientation we got a threshold |B21_app| <= 10.0G at about 1.4sec (shot 11) The locking density at 4.5G was 1.44e20/m^3 (shot 14) 4. A good sequence of points was obtained in the opposite (3rd) quadrant with [-Btop +Bbot +Gtop -Gbot], isolating the threshold (nebar=2e20) at 3.9 < |B21_app| < 5.4G (shot 24,25) The locking density at 4.6G was 1.44e20/m^3 (Shot#16) 5. No locked mode obtained at max current with rotated dipole [+Btop +Bbot -Gtop -Gbot] phi=38deg |B21_app|=4.5G We were unable to get a shot to locate the locking density, which is expected to be very low. Circle plot including 2e20/m^3 data points from 1050415 and today, with intrinsic model center, and circle at 5G/e20 (all today's points "by hand"; may change some with further analysis) is shown below. Green points unlocked, red triangles locked.
|
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Mar 17 2006 05:42:26:950PM |
| Author: Jim Irby |
| A PO error on shot 01 resulted in a disruption at 0.7 s. I zeroed the NL04 predictor by accident. Shot 02 was a no power test.
We certainly had problems with fizzles and a few duds today. These problems seemed to be cured mostly by adjustments to bz0 and a general trend downward in the prefill pulsewidth. The E-Left vertical leg cooling slowed us down during the first half of the run, but a change in the cooling setup to lower pump pressure and manual operation kept us below 10 minutes the rest of the run. This issue will be investigated more on Monday. test 02 PS prob 29 duds 09,10,28 fizzles 07,12,17,19,21,27 plasmas 01,03,04,05,06,08,11,13,14,15 16,18,20,22,23,24,25,26,30 |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Mar 17 2006 09:18:08:263AM | 1060317001 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#1: Bad runaways early disruption at 0.7sec TCI looks noisy. |
| Mar 17 2006 09:48:47:030AM | 1060317002 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#1 looked like there was no nl04 signal, but it's there. Jim seems to have zeroed the nl04 predictor. Re-do the load from scratch for shot#2: Load from 1060317018 Import seg2 from 1050415025 Recalculate ONLY THE MAGNETICS PREDICTORS: Wires 1-8, and 16. |
| Mar 17 2006 09:59:28:013AM | 1060317003 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#3: plasma to 1.7sec. ECE gate valve was closed, but I'm pretty sure there's no locked mode. Nebar~2.1e20. Next shot: Acoil on full current |
| Mar 17 2006 10:17:32:483AM | 1060317004 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#4: Acoil at 3500A, ECE signal not there yet EFIT didn't run. No locked mode, reduce NL04 to 1.0e20 and try again. B21_app=10.4G |
| Mar 17 2006 10:27:24:827AM | 1060317005 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#5: NL04 to 1.0e20; Acoil still at 4000 program Still no locked mode. Drop it to 0.8 for next shot. If that doesn't work, move on to "C" |
| Mar 17 2006 10:41:02:403AM | 1060317006 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#6: NL04 to 0.8e20; Acoil program still at 4000. Maybe locks in rampdown, around 1.57sec. Move on to Step 2C: Density in free-fall after 0.8sec, Acoil demand at 2000A. |
| Mar 17 2006 10:53:48:327AM | 1060317007 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#7: Move on to Step 2C: Density in free-fall after 0.8sec, Acoil demand at 2000A. Fizzle. |
| Mar 17 2006 11:28:13:640AM | 1060317008 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#8: Move on to Step 2C: Density in free-fall after 0.8sec, Acoil demand at 2000A. plasma to 1.65sec. Locked mode at 1.37sec, nl04=6.0e19, 4.7G on A-coil (1760A). Nebar=1.07e20, Btot(Model)=4.7G Compare 1050415030: NL04=0.95 at 4.4G (app), phi_a=-104deg. Let's move on 3A: [+Btop -Bbot -Gtop +Gbot] |
| Mar 17 2006 11:41:38:107AM | 1060317009 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#9: move on 3A: [+Btop -Bbot -Gtop +Gbot],NL04 back to 1.2e20, Acoil cur program back to 4000A. Dud. |
| Mar 17 2006 11:53:20:810AM | 1060317010 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#10: move on 3A: [+Btop -Bbot -Gtop +Gbot],NL04 back to 1.2e20, Acoil cur program back to 4000A. Dud |
| Mar 17 2006 12:15:59:840PM | 1060317011 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#10: move on 3A: [+Btop -Bbot -Gtop +Gbot],NL04 back to 1.2e20, Acoil cur program back to 4000A. plasma, some runaways -Locks around 1.4sec, nebar=1.95e20 ? B21_app=10.0G =(7.5,-6.5) Btot(model) = 9.7G Next shot: Drop NL04 to 1.0e20 to try to get it to lock earlier. |
| Mar 17 2006 12:21:55:403PM | 1060317012 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#11: Drop NL04 to 1.0e20 to try to get it to lock earlier. fizzle |
| Mar 17 2006 12:42:04:483PM | 1060317013 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#12: Drop NL04 to 1.0e20 to try to get it to lock earlier. plasma to 1.6sec, locks at 0.74sec, nebar=1.55e20. Well, that brackets it pretty well. Next: Part "C", density in free-fall after 0.8sec; Acoil prog to 1900A |
| Mar 17 2006 01:14:12:890PM | 1060317014 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#13: Part "3C", density in free-fall after 0.8sec; Acoil prog to 1900A plasma to 1.65sec Locks at 1.3sec,nebar=1.35 (nl4=7.5e19) but field is too low; Bapp=3.3G ? Acoil was programmed to 1600 and got 1280. We want 1700, so program 2000, I think. |
| Mar 17 2006 01:29:00:763PM | 1060317015 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#15: Part "3C", density in free-fall after 0.8sec; Acoil prog to 2000A plasma to 1.6 Locks at 1.23sec, nl04=8e19, nebar=1.44e20, B21_app=4.5G. Move to Case 4: Reverse leads to give [-Btop +Bbot +Gtop -Gbot] We'll leave the current and density program as is, so next shot will be case 4C; then go back up in density and current to get parts A and B |
| Mar 17 2006 01:46:18:373PM | 1060317016 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#16: Reverse leads to give [-Btop +Bbot +Gtop -Gbot] Part "4C", density in free-fall after 0.8sec; Acoil prog to 2000A plasma. Locks at 1.19sec, nl04=7.7e19, nebar=1.44e20, B21app=4.6G Btot (Model)=8.5G |
| Mar 17 2006 01:57:28:983PM | 1060317017 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#17: 4A - NL04=1.2e20, Acoil Current to 4000 (prog) fizzle. |
| Mar 17 2006 02:17:42:043PM | 1060317018 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#18: 4A - NL04=1.2e20, Acoil Current to 4000 (prog) plasma to 1.5sec locks at 1.45 I think - lose sawteeth, jump on magnetics, but no density fall? Density at nl04=1.46e20.Nebar=2.6e20 B21_app=(-6.5,7.5) = 10G, btot(mod)=13.9G Next shot: drop nl04 to 1.1e20 |
| Mar 17 2006 02:24:02:140PM | 1060317019 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#19:drop nl04 to 1.1e20 (ran high on 18) fizzle |
| Mar 17 2006 02:45:22:043PM | 1060317020 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#20:drop nl04 to 1.1e20 (ran high on 18) plasma, locked mode at .97sec, nl04=1.1, nebar=2.0e20 Next: Drop Acoil current from 4000 to 3300A (program) |
| Mar 17 2006 02:54:58:780PM | 1060317021 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#21: Drop Acoil current from 4000 to 3300A (program) fizzle. |
| Mar 17 2006 03:13:15:340PM | 1060317022 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#22: Drop Acoil current from 4000 to 3300A (program) plasma, locks at 1.23sec, b21_app=8.4G,nebar=2.05e20 B21_app=(-5.5,6.4) Next: drop acoil current from 3300A to 2800A (program) |
| Mar 17 2006 03:26:46:607PM | 1060317023 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#23: Drop Acoil current from 3300A to 2800A(program) plasma to 1.5sec lock at 1.27sec, nebar=2.06e20, B21=6.9G=(-4.7,5.3) Next: Acoil to 1800A, need to get a non-lock case |
| Mar 17 2006 03:43:18:687PM | 1060317024 | Steve Wolfe |
Shot#24: Acoil to 1800A, need to get a non-lock case
plasma to 1.66. No locked mode. B21_app=(-2.65,3.1)=3.9G
{Is it consistent with 4.5G result?)
Anyhow, that brackets it. Next go to 2300A (program)
This one has a possible lock in rampdown, at 1.55sec.
|
| Mar 17 2006 03:53:36:340PM | 1060317025 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#25: Acoil to 2300A plasma to 1.62sec Lock at 1.46sec, nebar=2.1e20, b21_app=(-3.7,4.25) Next: On to step 5A [+Btop +Bbot -Gtop -Gbot] |
| Mar 17 2006 04:17:31:920PM | 1060317026 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#26: Step 5A [+Btop +Bbot -Gtop -Gbot] Acoil=4000A program. NL04=1.1e20 program plasma. No locked mode. B21_app=4.5G = (3.6,2.8) Next: Do the density drop; I don't know if we can even get it low enough to lock in this direction with this spectrum. |
| Mar 17 2006 04:26:38:967PM | 1060317027 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#27: Do the density drop; Start from 8e19, free-fall after .8sec Acoil still at 4000 (program) to get |B21|=4.4G I don't know if we can even get nebar low enough to lock in this direction with this spectrum. Probably should have started with the negative sense of this case, but that will need to wait till next time. fizzle. |
| Mar 17 2006 04:38:51:793PM | 1060317028 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#28: Do the density drop; Start from 8e19, free-fall after .8sec Acoil still at 4000 (program) to get |B21|=4.5G dud |
| Mar 17 2006 04:50:55:217PM | 1060317029 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#29: Do the density drop; Start from 8e19, free-fall after .8sec Acoil still at 4000 (program) to get |B21|=4.5G No TF |
| Mar 17 2006 05:20:31:700PM | 1060317030 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#30: Last Try- Start from 8e19, free-fall after .8sec Acoil still at 4000 (program) to get |B21|=4.5G plasma to 0.6sec, disrupted before the density drop just after the start of the acoil pulse. Possible early locked mode??? There were some runaways and looks like an injection at.56sec, then it locks around .575 and there's a major injection at .599 |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Mar 17 2006 09:30:13:717AM | Jim Irby | loaded shot 1050415025 --- verfied only seg 1 and seg 2 were being used
loaded shot 1060316018 into seg 1 did recalc on all seg 2 lines did a load/clean Ip request is 1 MA Bt 5.4 T nl04 request is 1.2e20 /m^2 TF delay and fizzle back to normal --- no need for backporch No A-Coil current for this shot --- see if we can get locked modes plasma for 0.7 s --- lots of runaways | |
| Mar 17 2006 12:16:57:700PM | 1060317011 | Jim Irby | Just noticed my earlier entries were under TCI no PO
EF4 from -1325 to -1335 A prefill to 30 ms from 28 ms plasma into rampdown --- not a great startup but... |
| Mar 17 2006 12:31:41:077PM | 1060317012 | Jim Irby | nl04 from 1.2 to 1.0e20/m^2
fizzle --- |
| Mar 17 2006 12:40:52:140PM | 1060317013 | Jim Irby | prefill back to 28 ms
TF vert cooling from -182 to -184 vessel back to 35/35/35 from 20/20/20 folling this shot plasma into rampdown --- startup much better |
| Mar 17 2006 01:08:45:450PM | 1060317014 | Jim Irby | vessel at 35/35/35
nl04 ramped negative at 0.8 s from 1e20/m^2 A-Coils to 1600 A --- but Steve wanted 1900 A plasma into rampdown |
| Mar 17 2006 01:27:00:530PM | 1060317015 | Jim Irby | A-Coils to 2000 A
plasma into rampdown |
| Mar 17 2006 01:46:47:263PM | 1060317016 | Jim Irby | repeat with new A-Coil configuration
plasma |
| Mar 17 2006 02:03:30:700PM | 1060317017 | Jim Irby | nl04 request to 1.2e20 until 1.5 s
A-Coils to 4000 A fizzle --- killed at 20 ms by ?? |
| Mar 17 2006 02:16:33:763PM | 1060317018 | Jim Irby | try again with no DPCS changes
plasma |
| Mar 17 2006 02:30:02:857PM | 1060317019 | Jim Irby | pg1 from 50 to 60 ms starting at 0.3 s
nl04 from 1.2 to 1.1e20/m^2 fizzle problems with data system |
| Mar 17 2006 02:45:33:390PM | 1060317020 | Jim Irby | prefill from 28 to 26 ms
lost some data from last shot plasma --- startup good |
| Mar 17 2006 03:00:43:937PM | 1060317021 | Jim Irby | A-Coil current from 4000 to 3300 A
fizzle --- |
| Mar 17 2006 03:11:18:733PM | 1060317022 | Jim Irby | prefill from 26 to 24 ms
plasma --- startup very good |
| Mar 17 2006 03:20:48:763PM | 1060317023 | Jim Irby | A-Coil current to 2800 A
plasma |
| Mar 17 2006 03:33:34:077PM | 1060317024 | Jim Irby | A-Coil current to 1800 A from 2800 A
prefill from 24 to 22 ms --- almost lost startup on shot 23 plasma --- startup better |
| Mar 17 2006 03:52:40:560PM | 1060317025 | Jim Irby | A-Coil current to 2300 A
reduced prefill another ms to 21 ms plasma --- breakdown a little later |
| Mar 17 2006 04:15:38:247PM | 1060317026 | Jim Irby | Cell entry to change A-Coil configuration
A-Coil current to 4000 A plasma --- |
| Mar 17 2006 04:29:35:420PM | 1060317027 | Jim Irby | Drive density negative at 0.8 s starting from 8e19/m^2
fizzle --- spikes in CIII at .02 and .028 ms does in startup |
| Mar 17 2006 04:40:46:903PM | 1060317028 | Jim Irby | no DPCS changes
dud --- Bz0? |
| Mar 17 2006 05:02:18:373PM | 1060317029 | Jim Irby | EF4 from -1335 to -1345 A
no TF?? |
| Mar 17 2006 05:20:50:840PM | 1060317030 | Jim Irby | Try again with TF
disruption at 0.6 s a few injections starting at .1 s could be boron big injection at just before 0.6 s |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 09:13:52:780AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 2 | 09:40:47:090AM | Test | Ok | |
| 3 | 09:52:52:700AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 10:05:45:653AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 10:20:31:687AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 10:33:23:373AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 10:52:03:530AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 11:06:34:873AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 11:39:02:513AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 11:51:42:357AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 12:06:35:043PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 12:20:15:827PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 12:37:23:030PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 12:59:54:793PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 01:18:46:590PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 01:40:04:340PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 01:55:52:857PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 02:08:52:997PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 02:22:30:873PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 02:39:11:090PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 02:52:59:733PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 03:05:39:450PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 03:18:20:030PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 03:30:54:280PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 03:46:44:140PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 04:10:54:560PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 04:23:41:937PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 04:36:21:873PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 04:48:49:327PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 30 | 05:07:45:747PM | Plasma | Ok | |