| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Bruce Lipschultz |
| Physics operator(s): | Jim Irby |
| Engineering operator(s): | Andy Pfeiffer,Sam Pierson,Gary Dekow |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| MP430 - Between shot boronization SL Bruce Lipschultz, PO Jim Irby |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Apr 4 2006 03:53:52:717PM |
| Author: Bruce Lipschultz |
| Engineering setup:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Power systems as on 1060329005 A-coil configuration: normal [+Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot] and enabled. C-coil Start=0.3sec, Invert=2.0sec ICRF in Run-on by 7:15AM; desire ~ 3 MW steady for all shots Gas Setup: ---------- fill B-top 6psi D2 Hybrid Enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower 1 psi Argon Hybrid Disabled (PG1) fill B-side Upper 12 psi He-4 for ecdc Hybrid Disabled (PG2) fill B-main 40psi D2 Hybrid Enabled (PG3) NINJA: 12psi D2 *** Boronization system set up for between-shot boronization *** We will be using 20% diborane 80% He mixture which has twice the amount of diborane as usual. Enable ECE, VUV, Z-bolo shutter for all plasma shots; these must be disabled for between-shot boronization The A-Side TV camera shutter must be CLOSED before the boronizations (before the run and for the rest of the day). The MSE shutter must be CLOSED before the start of the run, and remain closed throughout the day. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SL plan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MP430 - Between shot boronization Plasma setup like 1060329005 Assume 10 minute boronization length to start with. Pressure 5 mTorr. Pause at center of each scan. Steady ECDC, no pulsing. To reduce fizzles after boronization the prefill is greatly reduced see 1050810xxx and wait to get the pressure down to <2.5x10-6 Torr We will start using static fill, rather than the prepuff. -1) Establish plasma operation with RF. 1) Establish plasma and RF power for suitable fiducial 2) Boronize sequence (1 shot to measure effect, 2nd shot to determine if it has worn off) using 10 cm wide scans to cover from 90 to 50 cm. Work from outer major radius inward in 10 cm steps. 3) Once done with the scan, return to the most effective location to examine reproducibility. 4) Scan using 5 cm stepsize on either side of the best location. Potential next steps - Switch in 10% diborane 90% He mixture bottle. - Compare the usual boronization including pulsed ECDC with leaving the ECDC on steadily during the period. - If not done earlier then reduce the length of boronizations now to 10 and 5 minutes length (4 shots min. if not including fizzles). - Compare boronization lifetime by comparing D&E heated versus J heated. |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Entered: Apr 4 2006 05:16:50:263PM |
| Author: Jim Irby |
| ECDC overnight in D2 at 2.e-4 Torr
Power systems as on 1060329005 A-coil configuration: normal [+Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot] and enabled. C-coil Start=0.3sec, Invert=2.0sec ICRF in Run-on by 7:15AM; desire ~ 3 MW steady for all shots Gas Setup: ---------- fill B-top 6psi D2 Hybrid disabled, Fill select enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower 1 psi Argon Hybrid Disabled (PG1) fill B-side Upper 12 psi He-4 for ecdc Hybrid Disabled (PG2) fill B-main 40psi D2 Hybrid Enabled (PG3) NINJA: 12psi D2 *** Boronization system set up for between-shot boronization *** We will be using 20% diborane 80% He mixture which has twice the amount of diborane as usual. Enable ECE, VUV, Z-bolo shutter for all plasma shots; these must be disabled for between-shot boronization The A-Side TV camera shutter must be CLOSED before the boronizations (before the run and for the rest of the day). The MSE shutter must be CLOSED before the start of the run, and remain closed throughout the day. |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Apr 11 2006 04:02:48:310PM |
| Author: Bruce Lipschultz |
| 1060405 - MP#430 'optimization of boronization location'
We did optimize the boronization process today. Several factors contributed to this. First, we learned that the pre-breakdown puff was better than the static fill for getting breakdown; With static fill we had 2 fizzles following a boronization. With the pre-puff we often had no fizzles. The second factor is that we learned a little about shortening the boronization process; Filling the machine with diborane can be done in parallel with the magnet resistance measurements saving ~ 5 minutes. We also found that we could start into init at higher pressures saving some time as well. The above, together with the engineering operators efficiency gains, led to a time between shots (at when init starts) of ~ 17 minutes on the big board time in the best case. One small additional change we made - we changed the relative sweep period and dwell time for the boronization. We kept the 20 sec dwell, but lengthened the sweep (which includes the dwell time) from 60 to 200s. We could consider eliminating the dwell completely. But, don't forget, although we do not think this change will have a big effect we cannot rule it out. We would like to compare this data, with 20% diborane, to the data from 1050705, when we last did a boronization location study with 78 MHz (1050810 was 50MHz on J-port, with a He3 resonance, so the erosion of the boronization erosion could be different). All shots today had rapidly decreasing confinement during the shot. It appears that it is faster than for 1050705; For example shots 1050705009 and 12 at 20 minutes boronization with 10% diborane have slower energy delay than shot 23 from today. So, although the stored energy from today matches that of 1050705, the degradation is faster, perhaps more like the 10 min. boronization shots from that day. The main goal of today, repeating the same boronization, but centered at different radial locations, was not accomplished. The problem was that the boronizations were not reproducible. The first 2 boronizations were done with the pressure under pressure feedback. It was clear that the pressure could not be controlled well. In one case I observed the pressure dropped below 1 mT for several minutes (the gauge onle reads down to 1 mT) and then jumped up to 14 mT; 5 mT was what was programmed. After the first 2 boronizations the operators switched to manual control but this was only marginally better. Because of all the efforts to get the pressure right the lengths of boronizations also varied beyond the 10 minutes requested. We hoped to make some sense of how much pressure variation there was by looking at the historian data. Unfortunately only 5 out of 10 were recorded in the trend data. The problem, in the end, was with the valve. It died in the 'open' position during the last boronziation. For further reference the following shots are of interest: 4: no boronization, for comparison 7: first shot after 85-95 cm boronization 10: first shot after 75-85 cm boronization 11: second shot after 75-85 cm boronization 14: first shot after 65-75 cm boronization 15: second shot after 65-75 cm boronization 17: first shot after 55-65 cm boronization 18: second shot after 55-65 cm boronization 19: first shot after 45-55 cm boronization 20: second shot after 45-55 cm boronization 21: first shot after 75-85 cm boronization 22: second shot after 75-85 cm boronization 23: first shot after 70-80 cm boronization 24: second shot after 70-80 cm boronization 25: first shot after 65-75 cm boronization 26: second shot after 65-75 cm boronization 28: first shot after 60-70 cm boronization 29: second shot after 60-70 cm boronization The time between shots (after a boronization) is as follows: shots 4-7: 58 minutes shots 7-10: 58:39 shots 11-14: 68:24 shots 15-17: 54:06 shots 18-19: 35:21 shots 20-21: 28:12 shots 22-23: 24:23 shots 24-25: 24:31 The 'standard' shot rate appears to be around 13 minutes. So, the 10 minute boronization added about 11 minutes time to between shots. It is possible to trim mor etime off the boronization schedule but it will need better gas changeover control and trying shots when the pressure is higher in the machine. If we repeat this run then, of course, we will need to redo the scans. But, we should aim to vary the pressure as well- if we could raise the pressure and boronize for a shorter period then we could shorten the boronization further. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Apr 5 2006 07:04:38:000PM |
| Author: Jim Irby |
| PO Summary for Run 1060405 Boronization localization
SL: Blip PO: Irby We began by establishing a LSN plasma on shots 01 to 04. Shot 05 was a dud following the first boronization. I had reduced the static fill pressure to 6.5e-6 Torr, which was clearly too low, but consistent with fill pressures obtained during pre-puffs on run 1050810. We then spend a few more shots searching for a good static fill pressure following boronization, but finally gave up on shot 16, when we went back to a pulsed gas prefill. Going to a 6 ms gas puff for the first shot following a boronization, and then going to 16 or 18 ms for the 2nd shot produced a very good string of discharges. We also had one nice 2nd shot startup with a 6 ms pre-puff. ***************** So the prescription for getting a discharge following between shot boronization is the same as it was last year: reduce pre-puff to 6 ms for the 1st shot. Then increase pre-puff to 16 or 18 ms for the 2nd and following shots. ***************** Shot 23 was the best performance discharge of the day with 199 kJ of stored energy. The ECDC scan for this shot was 70/75/80 cm. We had trouble from the beginning of the run today controlling the pressure during the boronization. By going to manual control of the voltage on the piezo valve we were able to control it most of the day, but we had to stop the run following shot 29 because the piezo failed in an open condition. The machine would immediately fill with gas when we tried to initiate the boronization. duds 05,08 fizzles 06,09,12,13,16,27 plasmas 01,02,03,04,07,10,11,14,15,17 18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,28 29 |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Apr 5 2006 09:17:45:570AM | 1060405001 | Bruce Lipschultz | 1 MA, nl04=1e20, fiducial shot. J tripping a bit. Repeat before boronization.
Repeated short H-modes. |
| Apr 5 2006 09:33:17:900AM | 1060405002 | Bruce Lipschultz | 1 MA, nl04=1.1e20. We seem to have lost a fringe on the interferometer leading to slightly higher density and that caused higher pressures at the antennas and J had problems. D antenna did as well?
H-factor ~ 1.4 with 2 MW. Repeat and try to get things (density and ICRF) settled. |
| Apr 5 2006 09:55:15:527AM | 1060405003 | Bruce Lipschultz | 1 MA, nl04=0.75e20. No interferometer fringes lost and too low a density. So set the density programming back to 1.0
H-factor ~ 1.0 with 3 MW. Repeat and try to get things (density and ICRF) settled. |
| Apr 5 2006 10:23:58:197AM | 1060405004 | Bruce Lipschultz | 1 MA, nl04=0.9e20.
OK to go for between shot boronization (10 minutes, scan from 85-95 cm, dweel at 90 cm, no pulsing). At the moment the boronization is set for 20 seconds of dwell (at one spot) out of a 60 second sweep period. |
| Apr 5 2006 11:00:00:743AM | 1060405005 | Bruce Lipschultz | dud
|
| Apr 5 2006 11:00:08:760AM | 1060405006 | Bruce Lipschultz | fizzle
|
| Apr 5 2006 02:56:59:723PM | 1060405007 | Bruce Lipschultz | 1 MA plasma, first after 85-95 cm boronization.
H=1.4 and dropping through the shot. Mainly D and E antennas - 2 MW. H-modes are much longer dprad/dt ~ 2 before H-mode and with full power (2 MW) dprad/dt ~ 8 during H-mode and with full power (2 MW) dprad/dt ~ 3 during the last h-mode. nrate 4 neutron rate ~ 1-2e13/s |
| Apr 5 2006 11:26:56:410AM | 1060405008 | Bruce Lipschultz | First attempt at plasma after boronization -
10 minutes, sweep 200 seconds with 20 s dwell, Sweep range 75-85 cm, dwell at 80 cm. Note we changed the sweep period. dud |
| Apr 5 2006 11:59:14:020AM | 1060405008 | Bruce Lipschultz | dud |
| Apr 5 2006 11:59:23:380AM | 1060405009 | Bruce Lipschultz | fizzle |
| Apr 5 2006 03:07:05:363PM | 1060405010 | Bruce Lipschultz | First plasma after boronization. Disrupted 0.9 s
10 minutes, sweep 200 seconds with 20 s dwell, Sweep range 75-85 cm, dwell at 80 cm. Note we changed the sweep period. 1 MA H~ 1.5 dprad/dt ~ 1.5 before H-mode (3 MW) dprad/dt ~ 2.0 during H-mode (2-3 MW) nrate_4 neutron rate 2.5e13/s Take another shot to recover. |
| Apr 5 2006 03:09:21:723PM | 1060405011 | Bruce Lipschultz | Second shot after 75-85 cm boronization
Still pretty good in terms of initial H-factor ~ 1.5, but rapidly drops dprad/dt ~ 1.6 before H-mode at 3 MW dprad/dt ~ 5 during H-mode at 3 MW nrate_4 neutron rate 2.5e13/s boronize next from 65-75 cm |
| Apr 5 2006 02:11:03:503PM | 1060405012 | Bruce Lipschultz | fizzle after 65-75 cm boronization |
| Apr 5 2006 02:06:01:833PM | 1060405013 | Bruce Lipschultz | fizzle after 65-75 cm boronization |
| Apr 5 2006 03:12:06:020PM | 1060405014 | Bruce Lipschultz | First shot after 65-75 cm boronization
Still pretty good in terms of initial H-factor ~ 1.7 (Wtot ~ 167 kJ), but drops dprad/dt ~ 0.3 before H-mode at 3 MW dprad/dt ~ 2 during H-mode at 3 MW nrate_4 neutron rate 4.8e13/s repeat shot |
| Apr 5 2006 03:14:05:427PM | 1060405015 | Bruce Lipschultz | Second shot after 65-75 cm boronization
Still pretty good in terms of initial H-factor ~ 1.5 (Wtot ~ 154 kJ), but drops dprad/dt ~ 2 before H-mode at 3 MW dprad/dt ~ 4 during H-mode at 3 MW nrate_4 neutron rate 3.2e13/s go on to boronize at 55-65 cm |
| Apr 5 2006 02:13:03:207PM | 1060405016 | Bruce Lipschultz | fizzle after 55-65 cm boronization |
| Apr 5 2006 02:45:06:537PM | 1060405017 | Bruce Lipschultz | First shot after 55-65 cm boronization. This went on for 12-14 minutes while they tried to get the pressure to hold constant. It had been varying from below 1 mT up to 14 mT!
Initial H-factor ~ 1.65 (Wtot ~ 177 kJ), but drops no dprad/dt before H-mode as it immediately goes into H-mode. Note that the plasma is dithering (Ohmic H-mode) before the RF comes on. dprad/dt ~ 1.8 during H-mode at 3 MW nrate_4 neutron rate reaching 6e13 |
| Apr 5 2006 02:43:40:897PM | 1060405018 | Bruce Lipschultz | Second shot after 55-65 cm boronization.
Initial H-factor ~ 1.2 (Wtot ~ 130 kJ), but drops immediately goes into H-mode so no pre-H-mode dprad/dt dprad/dt ~ 7 during H-mode at 3 MW nrate_4 neutron rate reaching 2e13 |
| Apr 5 2006 03:20:07:440PM | 1060405019 | Bruce Lipschultz | First shot after 45-55 cm boronization.
Initial H-factor ~ 1.66 (Wtot ~ 180 kJ), but drops immediately goes into H-mode so no pre-H-mode dprad/dt dprad/dt ~ 2 during H-mode at 3 MW nrate_4 neutron rate reaching 7e13 |
| Apr 5 2006 03:38:45:953PM | 1060405020 | Bruce Lipschultz | Second shot after 45-55 cm boronization.
Initial H-factor ~ 1.2 (Wtot ~ 132 kJ), but drops dprad/dt ~ 3 before H-mode at 3 MW dprad/dt ~ 8.5 during H-mode at 3 MW nrate_4 neutron rate reaching 2e13 |
| Apr 5 2006 03:59:03:830PM | 1060405021 | Bruce Lipschultz | Return to a boronization from 75-85 cm.
First shot afterwards. disrupted at 0.5s. Is it a coincidence that shot 10 also disrupted and the boronization was at the same place? |
| Apr 5 2006 04:58:14:800PM | 1060405022 | Bruce Lipschultz | Second shot after 75-85cm boronization
H~1.4 before dropping (132 kJ) dprad/dt ~ 2 before H-mode dprad/dt ~ 6.6 during H-mode at 3 MW nrate_4 neutron rate 2e13/s go on to boronize at 70-80 cm |
| Apr 5 2006 05:01:20:800PM | 1060405023 | Bruce Lipschultz | First shot after 70-80cm boronization
H~1.83 before dropping (196 kJ) no dprad/dt before H-mode dprad/dt ~ 2 during H-mode at 3 MW nrate_4 neutron rate 10e13/s |
| Apr 5 2006 04:54:34:000PM | 1060405024 | Bruce Lipschultz | Second shot after 70-80cm boronization
H~1.4 before dropping (132 kJ) no dprad/dt before H-mode dprad/dt ~ 6.6 during H-mode at 3 MW nrate_4 neutron rate 2e13/s go on to boronize at 65-75 cm |
| Apr 5 2006 05:15:14:907PM | 1060405025 | Bruce Lipschultz | First shot after 65-75cm boronization
H~1.7 before dropping (185 kJ) no dprad/dt before H-mode dprad/dt ~ 2 during H-mode at 3 MW nrate_4 neutron rate 8e13/s |
| Apr 5 2006 05:34:14:220PM | 1060405026 | Bruce Lipschultz | Second shot after 65-75cm boronization
H~1.2 before dropping (117 kJ) no dprad/dt before H-mode dprad/dt > 8 during H-mode at 3 MW nrate_4 neutron rate 1.7e13/s |
| Apr 5 2006 05:43:04:690PM | 1060405027 | Bruce Lipschultz | fizzle |
| Apr 5 2006 06:05:08:050PM | 1060405028 | Bruce Lipschultz | First shot after 60-70cm boronization
H~1.4 for a short period before dropping (140 kJ) no dprad/dt before H-mode dprad/dt ~2.5 during H-mode at 3 MW nrate_4 neutron rate 3e13/s |
| Apr 5 2006 06:42:36:987PM | 1060405029 | Bruce Lipschultz | Second shot after 60-70cm boronization
Reversed J with D/E in time to test whether J can work at slightly lower density and higher power. The answer, at least for now, is no. H~1.2 for a short period |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Apr 5 2006 09:16:28:260AM | Jim Irby | loaded 1060329005 into seg 3 to compare with seg 2 from yesterday.
Essentially the same. did a load/clean | |
| Apr 5 2006 09:16:50:027AM | Jim Irby | Purging diborane system and opening the bottle
bottle open at 08:53 | |
| Apr 5 2006 09:15:56:570AM | 1060405001 | Jim Irby | set nl_04 request to 1.0e20 from 0.9e20 /m^2
static fill request to 1.7e-5 from 1.9e-5 Torr plasma into rampdown Bz0 -1.16 mT at t=0 vs +0.79 mT last shot yesterday but startup looks good 3 MW of rf with a few trips sparker voltage 28.67 kV at t=0, current 245 uA Results 1 - 4 of 4. |
| Apr 5 2006 09:45:19:417AM | 1060405002 | Jim Irby | No DPCS changes
plasma into rampdown breakdown later --- time to adjust Bz0? |
| Apr 5 2006 09:52:38:510AM | 1060405003 | Jim Irby | nl_04 request to 9e19/m^2 (problem with feedback on last shot)
ef4 from -1350 to -1340 A plasma into rampdown 3 MW of rf |
| Apr 5 2006 10:04:28:400AM | 1060405004 | Jim Irby | no DPCS changes
plasma into rampdown boronize before next shot |
| Apr 5 2006 11:15:13:723AM | 1060405005 | Jim Irby | ef4 from -1340 to -1330 A
boronized for 20 minutes static fill request to 6.5e-6 Torr go into INIT when basepressue reaches 2.5e-6 Torr dud ratiomatic at 3e-5 Torr at t=0 vs 6e-5 on last shot |
| Apr 5 2006 10:47:20:917AM | 1060405006 | Jim Irby | static fill request back to 1.7e-5 Torr
fizzle --- late breakdown CIII light nearly gone |
| Apr 5 2006 11:06:44:267AM | 1060405007 | Jim Irby | static fill request to 1.5e-6 Torr
plasma into rampdown --- longer lasting h-modes j-port in trouble h/(h+d) down to 4% from about 8% will boronize before next shot |
| Apr 5 2006 11:27:18:740AM | 1060405008 | Jim Irby | boronized for 10 minutes
static fill request to 8.2e-6 Torr dud --- fields okay |
| Apr 5 2006 11:41:34:240AM | 1060405009 | Jim Irby | static fill request to 1.5e-5 Torr
fizzle --- Bz0 drifted up again |
| Apr 5 2006 12:00:54:613PM | 1060405010 | Jim Irby | ef4 to -1340 from -1330 A
disruption at 0.915 s fields okay |
| Apr 5 2006 12:28:01:957PM | 1060405011 | Jim Irby | no DPCS changes
plasma into rampdown, 2.5 MW, sustained h-mode, 157 kJ boronization seems to bring up sparker current: now at 270 uA |
| Apr 5 2006 12:52:20:287PM | 1060405012 | Jim Irby | boronized --- problems setting fill pressure
static fill request to 1.2e-5 Torr INIT at 2.5e-6 Torr fizzle --- Bz0 up a little |
| Apr 5 2006 01:25:26:850PM | 1060405013 | Jim Irby | no DPCS changes
static fill request to 1.5e-5 Torr fizzle --- breakdown okay but.. |
| Apr 5 2006 01:26:16:300PM | 1060405014 | Jim Irby | no changes
plasma into rampdown |
| Apr 5 2006 01:50:50:317PM | 1060405015 | Jim Irby | no changes
plasma into rampdown |
| Apr 5 2006 02:12:17:973PM | 1060405016 | Jim Irby | boronized for at least 13 minutes at variable pressures
will go back to puffed gas startup PG4 puff from -0.506 to -0.500 s Screw up ---- forgot to load shot --- got 20 ms puff |
| Apr 5 2006 02:29:40:520PM | 1060405017 | Jim Irby | prefill to 18 ms from 6 ms
plasma into rampdown --- 178 kJ h/(h+d) down compared to shot 15 |
| Apr 5 2006 02:42:39:567PM | 1060405018 | Jim Irby | ef4 from -1340 to -1345 A
1.8e-6 Torr on IGT in CHECK plasma into rampdown --- startup better |
| Apr 5 2006 03:15:19:207PM | 1060405019 | Jim Irby | boronized for 10 minutes
pre-puff for 6 ms -- load/clean going into INIT at 4e-6 Torr at 32 minutes plasma --- bad startup, but will take it 181 kJ |
| Apr 5 2006 03:27:08:890PM | 1060405020 | Jim Irby | pre-puff to 18 ms from 6 ms
plasma into rampdown --- startup looks very good neuts down |
| Apr 5 2006 03:56:51:737PM | 1060405021 | Jim Irby | pre-puff to 6 ms --- load/clean
start boronization at 7 minutes end boronization 17 minutes go into INIT at 4e-6 Torr ( 25:29 minutes) disruption at 0.496 s ufo swarm following disruption bounces off outer wall |
| Apr 5 2006 04:10:49:173PM | 1060405022 | Jim Irby | repeat -- w/o disruption?
pre-puff was only 6 ms! plasma into rampdown --- bounce on startup |
| Apr 5 2006 04:33:42:517PM | 1060405023 | Jim Irby | pre-puff 6 ms
boronized for 10 minutes (70/75/80 cm) INIT at 4e-6 Torr plasma into rampdown --- 197 kJ |
| Apr 5 2006 04:47:38:283PM | 1060405024 | Jim Irby | pre-puff to 18 ms
plasma into rampdown |
| Apr 5 2006 05:10:59:050PM | 1060405025 | Jim Irby | boronized (65/70/75 cm)
pre-puff at 6 ms with load/clean entered INIT at 21:57 minutes and 4.0e-6 Torr plasma into rampdown |
| Apr 5 2006 05:21:21:143PM | 1060405026 | Jim Irby | pre-puff to 18 ms and load/clean
plasma into rampdown |
| Apr 5 2006 05:46:01:157PM | 1060405027 | Jim Irby | boronization (60/65/70 cm)
pre-puff 6 ms load/clean INIT at 5e-6 Torr (19:55 minutes) fizzle |
| Apr 5 2006 05:57:38:220PM | 1060405028 | Jim Irby | ef4 from -1345 to -1350 A
pre-puff from 6 ms to 16 ms plasma into rampdown --- |
| Apr 5 2006 06:52:00:237PM | 1060405029 | Jim Irby | nl_04 request to 8e19/m^2
pre-puff to 18 ms from 16 ms load/clean 2.4e-6 Torr IGT on INIT plasma into rampdown **** stop run because of problem with diborane piezo valve |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 09:01:46:150AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 2 | 09:18:46:993AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 09:35:46:337AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 09:53:02:883AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 10:23:30:993AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 10:37:55:777AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 10:51:05:400AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 11:21:59:740AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 11:35:47:240AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 11:48:42:723AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 12:03:42:770PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 12:43:55:100PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 12:57:17:317PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 01:12:07:503PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 01:24:51:443PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 02:03:56:207PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 02:19:00:677PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 02:31:59:520PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 03:07:19:693PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 03:21:05:503PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 03:49:16:987PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 04:02:31:830PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 04:27:14:767PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 04:40:33:237PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 05:05:08:877PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 05:17:49:250PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 05:40:16:000PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 05:53:39:893PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 06:06:12:690PM | Plasma | Ok | |