| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Chuck Kessel |
| Physics operator(s): | Robert Granetz |
| Engineering operator(s): | Andy Pfeiffer,Bill Byford,Bill Parkin |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| MP# 454: High bootstrap current fraction plasmas Session leaders: C. Kes |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Jul 20 2006 04:14:51:717PM |
| Author: Amanda Hubbard |
| Session Leader plan for 1060721: MP 454: High Bootstsrap Current Fraction Plasmas
Session Leader: Chuck Kessel Physics Operator: Bob Granetz Aim: To establish the feasibility of obtaining high bootstrap fraction plasmas using controlled ITBs at low current, via off and on-axis heating. We will use 4.5 T scenario with off-axis heating at 80 MHz, on-axis at 70 MHz. If successful scenarios are developed, and LH is available, may try LHCD to drive additional non-inductive current. This would be dependent on being able to run both LH and ICRH systems together. Overnight boronization followed by ECDC is desired; see phsyop plan for details. May also necessitate ICRF conditioning before the run. 1) Establish 'standard' ITB at 4.5 T, 800 kA, target nel 9e19 m-2. Suggest starting from 1060707031 (4.7 T, 700 kA) and adjusting waveforms as needed. Apply 80 MHz only 2-3 MW, starting early in I/Bt flat top (~ 0.6-1.4 s) no on-axis power, produce H-mode and ITB Repeat until steady H-modes, ITB achieved. (3-4 shots). May apply J-port late in flat top to condition. LHCD may wish to test at low power late in RF pulse. 2) add 70 MHz on-axis power to successful case above, 0.5 & 1.0 MW , timing depending on ne and Prad ramp. (3 shots) 3) following same Ip ramp as 800 kA, flattop at 600 kA, move on-time of 80 MHz earlier, no on-axis power, produce H-mode and ITB. Extend flat top length if volt-seconds permit, to allow more time for ITB development. 4) add 70 MHz on-axis power to successful case above, 0.5 & 1.0 MW 5, 6) Assuming success, repeat above ITB production and stabilization at 450 kA, 300 kA. Determine lower limit for getting decent confinement. 7) If steady, reasonable low ne ITBs have been achieved, return to most promising condition and try applying LHCD during flat top. Probably 90 degree phasing, maximum power from 1060720. This should maximize the non-inductive fraction and give useful info for future AT scenarios. |
| Entered: Jul 21 2006 08:37:46:857AM |
| Author: Chuck Kessel |
| Aim: To establish the feasibility of obtaining high bootstrap fraction plasmas using controlled ITBs at low current, via off and on-axis heating. We will use 4.5 T scenario with off-axis heating at 80 MHz, on-axis at 70 MHz. If successful scenarios are developed, may try LHCD to drive additional non-inductive current. Overnight boronization followed by ECDC is desired; see phsyop plan for details. May also necessitate ICRF conditioning before the run. 1) Establish 'standard' ITB at 4.5 T, 800 kA, target nel 9e19 m-2. Suggest starting from 1060707031 (4.7 T, 700 kA) and adjusting waveforms as needed. Apply 80 MHz only 2-3 MW, starting early in I/Bt flat top (~ 0.6-1.4 s) no on-axis power, produce H-mode and ITB Repeat until steady H-modes, ITB achieved. (3-4 shots). May apply J-port late in flat top to condition. 2) add 70 MHz on-axis power to successful case above, 0.5 & 1.0 MW , timing depending on ne and Prad ramp. (3 shots) 3) following same Ip ramp as 800 kA, flattop at 600 kA, move on-time of 80 MHz earlier, no on-axis power, produce H-mode and ITB 4) add 70 MHz on-axis power to successful case above, 0.5 & 1.0 MW 5, 6) Assuming success, repeat above ITB production and stabilization at 450 kA, 300 kA. Determine lower limit for getting decent confinement. 7) If steady, reasonable low ne ITBs have been achieved, return to most promising condition and try applying LHCD during flat top. Probably 90 degree phasing, maximum power from 1060720. This should maximize the non-inductive fraction and give useful info for future AT scenarios. |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Entered: Jul 21 2006 08:13:08:750AM |
| Author: Robert Granetz |
Engineering setup for Friday 21 July 2006 MP# 454: High bootstrap current fraction plasmas Session leaders: C. Kessel/A. Hubbard Physics operator: R. Granetz Overnight boronization, followed by the usual ECDC in helium (~4 hours), and finally by an hour or two of ECDC in deuterium. Bake at 60 C. The run will start at 09:00 and end at 17:00. Power systems as on 1060707031 (except tweak Bt to 4.5 T and Ip to 0.8 MA). A-coil configuration: normal [+Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot] and enabled. Gas Setup: fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar + 2 psi Ne Hybrid DISABLED (PG1) leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) fill B-main (C-side) with 40 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3) leave NINJA as is disabled Enable the following gate valves and shutters, assuming no vacuum problems: ECE, VUV, Z-bolo shutters Torvac setup: Gate valves open Key diagnostics: ECE, VB, TCI, TS essential. Reflectometry, PCI, MSE high desirable. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ICRF Setup: all transmitters (70 and 80 MHz) in run-on by 08:30. We will need 0.5-1.5 MW at 70 MHz, and 2-3 MW at 80 Mhz. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Run plan: Start with 4.5 T and 0.8 MA. We will basically be decreasing Ip shot-to-shot, while varying the application of RF frequencies and timing. See the session leaders' plan for more information. |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 24 2006 09:19:54:563AM |
| Author: Chuck Kessel |
| H-mode + ITB plasmas were established at plasma currents of 800, 600 and 450 kA. The toroidal field was fixed at 4.5 T, with the (1-2.8 MW) 80 MHz launcher giving off-axis heating (HFS, turned on at 600 ms) and the (0.5-1.0 MW) 70 MHz launcher giving on-axis heating. At 800 kA, H-modes with mild ITBs were generated, however, some impurity influx was consistently causing radiative collapses which resulted in H-to-L transitions. Density profile peakings of 1.25 were observed. The source of impurity was not found, but the X-pt position was moved and plasma current lowered to 600 kA. At 600 kA, the 70 MHz was effective at slowing the density rise (010, 012, 014), with 014 clearly the best stabilized H-mode+ITB discharge of the day. Soon after 014 the 70 MHz launcher was no longer working, and we had to run off-axis heating only discharges. The plasma current was lowered to 450 kA, and a power scan of the 80 MHz heating was done. Due to the lack of the on-axis heating the density rises were not controlled, and resulted in back transitions to the L-mode. Fast density rises resulted from ITB formation, giving short lived peaked density phases, although the ITB's were still clearly visible in the density profile data prior to the H-to-L transitions. The power scan (at 450 kA) showed that 1.0 MW was insufficient to get into the H-mode, 1.5 MW appeared to slowly enter H-mode, 1.75-2.8 MW had H-modes and appear to have ITB's as well before the H-to-L transition. Finally a power ramp was tried to try to slow the density rise, and appears to have worked, but there was no time left to examine it further.
Overall, it appears that H-mode + ITB's can be created at lower currents, as low as 450 kA. There was no apparent limitation to lowering the plasma current even further. The density and stored energies dropped with lower plasma current, although the peak electron temperatures consistently reached 1.25-1.5 keV regardless of current. From a cursory examination, the loop voltage did not drop over the plasma current variation, but the transient nature of the H-mode + ITB's in these discharges make this difficult to interpret. Whether higher bootstrap current would have resulted if the transport regime was sustained will be examined. Several questions arose out of the experiments: 1) how important was the timing of the on-axis power versus its magnitude in setting the final density in H-mode+ITB shots? 2) are there power trajectories that can make the formation of these plasmas more reliable (more directly, slow the density rise down), such as a power ramp versus full on? 3) as the plasma current is lowered, the pulse length can be extended (desirable for future experiments to establish long steady configurations), what are the limitations to doing this (TF coil, ICRF, PFC heating??) 4) are the features of these H-mode+ITB plasmas changing as the current is lowered? |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 21 2006 05:02:18:643PM |
| Author: Robert Granetz |
Run summary for Friday 21 July 2006:
MP# 454: High bootstrap current fraction plasmas
Session leaders: C. Kessel/A. Hubbard
Physics operator: R. Granetz
The tokamak ran quite reliably today in terms of plasma operation. D and E
antenna systems regularly gave 2+ MW for long, fault-free times. J-antenna
(70 MHz) was also operated at the 0.5-0.75 MW level until transmitter #3
developed a problem after shot 16. Good core peaking was observed on many
shots, and there were some ITBs, but there were problems keeping the core
temperature high. See the session leaders' summaries for detailed physics
results.
Note: the DNB was fired into every plasma, starting with shot 3.
Scorecard: 27 plasmas
0 duds
0 fizzles
0 gas system tests
0 TF scanner tests
0 power supply tests (EF3-only)
0 no power MDS shot cycles
--------------
Total: 27 shot cycles
|
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Jul 21 2006 09:38:49:723AM | 1060721001 | Chuck Kessel | good test shot |
| Jul 21 2006 09:56:11:417AM | 1060721002 | Chuck Kessel | interesting shot, H-mode and density rise, then a little RF power < 1 MW and another density rise |
| Jul 21 2006 10:18:08:690AM | 1060721003 | Amanda Hubbard | Nice shot . 2 MW D and E, clean, gives nice long H-mode. And apparently an ITB, judging from bremstrahlung. Te starts to drop around 1.3 secs, will try to add some J-port. |
| Jul 21 2006 10:22:29:910AM | 1060721003 | Chuck Kessel | good RF pulse at 2 MW, density rise follows RF on time, Te flat at 1.25 keV in spite of density rise, probably a smaller ITB |
| Jul 21 2006 10:41:57:107AM | 1060721004 | Chuck Kessel | RF power was up, disruption |
| Jul 21 2006 10:59:03:960AM | 1060721005 | Chuck Kessel | another disruption, something getting into plasma and radiating |
| Jul 21 2006 11:13:43:400AM | 1060721006 | Chuck Kessel | pulse much better, more stuff into plasma and strong radiation blips, plasma recovers, but drops out of H-mode, RF power good and 70 MHz fired |
| Jul 21 2006 11:25:56:920AM | 1060721007 | Chuck Kessel | RF power dropped to 1.8 MW, radiation bursts occur earlier in discharge, plasma in H-mode and struggling to stay in H-mode, Te contuning to recover thru shot, radiative collapse |
| Jul 21 2006 11:33:17:377AM | 1060721007 | Amanda Hubbard | This shot did have an ITB after the injections. But, presumably because of them, Prad increased in core and caused an early end. |
| Jul 21 2006 11:46:45:380AM | 1060721007 | Chuck Kessel | Ip = 600 kA, shorter pulse, RF power at 1.8 MW, another radiation collapse |
| Jul 21 2006 11:55:11:120AM | 1060721009 | Chuck Kessel | longer 600 kA pulse, RF pulse good at 1.8 MW, but 70 MHz barely on before end of discharge, density profile peaking |
| Jul 21 2006 12:14:43:860PM | 1060721009 | Amanda Hubbard |
This one definitely had an ITB, with max peaking at 1.0 secs. However, Te starts decreasing ~ 0.87 secs, getting to a few 100 eV by end of H-mode (~1.3 s). H-factor declines accordingly, from 1 to ~ 0.2! Next shot, add some central heating earlier, 0.85 s in hoes of avoiding this. |
| Jul 21 2006 12:15:35:860PM | 1060721010 | Amanda Hubbard | Adding J-port earlier did help - Te collapse delayed to 1 second. Peaking transiently arrested, but still continues. Raise power on all RF next shot. |
| Jul 21 2006 12:42:37:653PM | 1060721012 | Chuck Kessel | nice long pulse, density peaking stronger, RF pulse good except drop out of on axis power which causes drop out of H-mode |
| Jul 21 2006 12:45:33:310PM | 1060721012 | Amanda Hubbard |
Cleat ITB. The increased central heating (0.7 MW) does work; Te0 increases and Prad, ne0 stop rising. But, following a J-port trip at 0.93, get strong cooling from which ITB doesn't recover even after J returns. 61 kJ, beta_p =0.6, H=1.1 (at 0.92 s). |
| Jul 21 2006 01:06:30:710PM | 1060721014 | Chuck Kessel | good long pulse, RF power perfect, ITB forming and RF clamping density rise maybe too hard or too early |
| Jul 21 2006 01:20:59:637PM | 1060721015 | Chuck Kessel | moved on axis RF from 0.85 to 0.95 s,dropped out of H-mode, density rose too fast before we could get on-axis power on |
| Jul 21 2006 01:28:34:687PM | 1060721016 | Chuck Kessel | similar to 15, drop out in temperature before on-axis RF power |
| Jul 21 2006 01:28:47:187PM | 1060721016 | Amanda Hubbard | On this shot the Te collapse came a little earlier (0.85 s), I think due to a small injection at 0.81 secs. nepeaking to 1.36, decays after J-port on.
Next shot, move J to 0.9 secs, and try to increase 80 MHz power |
| Jul 21 2006 02:46:25:637PM | 1060721017 | Amanda Hubbard | Change of run plan due to problem with J-port. We will have to use 80 MHz only for the remainder. Have decided to explore the impact of power variation on rate of rise/duration of ITBs, along with continuing to lower current.
Start with 2.2 MW. Without the central heating, get Te collapse at 0.85 secs. Amazingly, Te0 stays steady at 300 eV for the rest of the RF pulse (and what looks like multiple H-modes). |
| Jul 21 2006 03:14:04:257PM | 1060721017 | Chuck Kessel | no on-axis power, so have strong density rise makeing plasma exit H-mode, RF power at 2.3 MW, Ip = 600 kA |
| Jul 21 2006 03:15:04:883PM | 1060721018 | Chuck Kessel | same as 17 but RF at 1.5 MW, slower density rise (more linear?) |
| Jul 21 2006 03:40:27:643PM | 1060721019 | Chuck Kessel | Ip = 450 kA, P = 1.0 MW, not enough power to get in H-mode |
| Jul 21 2006 03:49:47:927PM | 1060721020 | Chuck Kessel | Ip = 450 kA, P = 2.0 MW, density rise with RF power but no Thomson |
| Jul 21 2006 03:50:51:100PM | 1060721021 | Chuck Kessel | same as 20, got Thomson, get fast density rise and drop out of H-mode, transient ITB |
| Jul 21 2006 03:52:21:833PM | 1060721021 | Amanda Hubbard |
This shot was a repeat. Got YAG and confirmed a clear, if brief, ITB. ne0 to 3e20 m-3 at 0.84 s, peaking factor to 1.6, foot around 79 cm. Te collapse at 0.79 secs, ITB collapse at 0.84 Next shot, reduce RF power. |
| Jul 21 2006 04:09:14:717PM | 1060721021 | Amanda Hubbard | At 1.5 MW, got a later H-mode (L-H 0.96 s).
Very brief but definite ITB at 1.1 secs - ne0 2.67e20, peaking factor 1.7. But Te0 drops from 1.04 s, is 0.6 by 1.1 s. We really need the central heating! |
| Jul 21 2006 04:43:23:730PM | 1060721024 | Amanda Hubbard | Higher power, 2.8 MW. Again, clear ITB on ne.2e0 2.8e20 m-3.
Te0 drop is only slightly earlier, at 0.78 secs; ne is pretty peaked at this point, would be a good case to try central heating if we had it. |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Jul 20 2006 11:16:59:553PM | Robert Granetz | Use segments 1,3, and 4 from yesterday's run, and load segment 2 from 1060707031 segment 2. (I confirmed that segment 2 was the one in use back on that shot.) Changed Ip to 0.8 MA. Changed Bt to 4.5 T (125 kA) Changed nl_04 to 0.9e20 m-2 Saved in /home/granetz/pcs_scratch as shot 1060721000. | |
| Jul 21 2006 09:24:13:843AM | Robert Granetz | A small air leak opened up around 08:45 (N2, Ar), but it mysteriously went away after a few minutes. | |
| Jul 21 2006 09:42:00:910AM | 1060721001 | Robert Granetz | Just noticed that A-coil current is programmed with a ramp, which is an unnecessary holdover from the shot I copied from. I will set it at a constant 2 kA, starting with the next shot. |
| Jul 21 2006 10:29:18:570AM | 1060721001 | Robert Granetz | Shot 01 -- Plasma. Good shot. 0.8 MA, 4.6 T, 1.0e20 m-2. Next shot: tweak Bt down to 4.5 T (123 kA) and a slightly flattop earlier time. Also take 1 ms off of pre-fill, and program A-coils with a flat 2 kA, rather than the ramp that's there now. |
| Jul 21 2006 10:28:58:837AM | 1060721002 | Robert Granetz | Shot 02 -- Plasma. Good shot. 0.8 MA, 4.5 T. H-mode and pretty high density. Got a little power from D and E, but lots of faulting. Next shot: repeat with more RF. |
| Jul 21 2006 10:11:18:783AM | 1060721003 | Robert Granetz | Shot 03 -- Plasma. Good shot. Prf=2.0 MW, long pulse (D+E, 80 MHz). Long H-mode. Next shot: no PCS changes. Get J-port on (70 MHz). |
| Jul 21 2006 10:41:40:183AM | 1060721004 | Robert Granetz | Shot 04 -- Plasma. Disrupted at t=0.85. It looks like there was an impurity injection at t=0.81 s. Next shot: repeat, no DPCS changes. |
| Jul 21 2006 10:52:59:353AM | 1060721005 | Robert Granetz | Shot 05 -- Plasma. Disrupted at t=0.97 s due to another injection at t=0.86 s. The video cameras do not show anything obvious. Prf=2.25 MW from D and E. Next shot: try again. |
| Jul 21 2006 11:04:04:543AM | 1060721006 | Robert Granetz | Shot 06 -- Plasma. Good shot, no disruption. There were still some injections around t=0.8-0.9 s. Prf(D+E)=2.2 MW, P(70 Mhz)=0.5 MW at t=1.3 s. Next shot: repeat, no DPCS changes. |
| Jul 21 2006 11:23:04:323AM | 1060721007 | Robert Granetz | Shot 08 -- Plasma. Good shot. ITB? Still got some injections. D+E=1.8 MW, J=0.5 MW. Next shot: reduce Ip to 0.6 MA but with the same initial rampup. |
| Jul 21 2006 11:42:04:940AM | 1060721008 | Robert Granetz | Shot 08 -- Plasma. Disrupted at t=0.87 s. Ip=0.6 MA. Next shot: move RXL in by 1 cm. |
| Jul 21 2006 12:02:22:247PM | 1060721010 | Robert Granetz | Shot 09 -- Plasma. Disrupted at t=1.38 s. RXL moved in 1.1-1.2 cm, as requested. Got an ITB. Next shot: no DPCS changes. |
| Jul 21 2006 12:12:20:157PM | 1060721011 | Robert Granetz | Shot 10 -- Plasma. Disrupted at 1.38 s. J-port is now coming on at t=0.85 s. Core peaking was not as good as the previous shot. Next shot: load A-coil feedback into wire 9 (was just preprogrammed). |
| Jul 21 2006 12:21:20:190PM | 1060721011 | Robert Granetz | Shot 11 -- Plasma, but very short, ugly, and disruptive. (Forgot to remove A-coil preprogramming, but it didn't get a chance to turn on anyway.) Next shot: Remove A-coil pre-programming; move integrator start time to 0.3 s (from 0.5) |
| Jul 21 2006 12:37:02:730PM | 1060721012 | Robert Granetz | Shot 12 -- Plasma. Good shot. Full length. Got 2.0 MW from D+E, 0.5 MW from J. Got some good core peaking. Next shot: repeat, no DPCS changes. |
| Jul 21 2006 12:47:04:780PM | 1060721013 | Robert Granetz | Shot 13 -- Plasma, but very short. Impurity injection at 0.27 s killed it. Next shot: repeat, no DPCS changes |
| Jul 21 2006 01:04:19:270PM | 1060721014 | Robert Granetz | Shot 14 -- Plasma. Good shot, full length. 2.0 MW from D+E, 0.75 MW from J, both 70 and 80 MHz for long, fault-free pulse...beautiful. Almost no core peaking though. Next shot: no DPCS changes. |
| Jul 21 2006 01:15:15:663PM | 1060721015 | Robert Granetz | Shot 15 -- Plasma. Disrupted at t=1.4 s. 2.0 MW (D+E), 0.6 MW (J). Core peaking increases until J-port turns on. Next shot: no DPCS changes. |
| Jul 21 2006 01:31:36:577PM | 1060721016 | Robert Granetz | Shot 16 -- Plasma. Good shot, full length. Next shot: no DPCS changes. RF timing will be changed. |
| Jul 21 2006 02:34:22:600PM | 1060721016 | Robert Granetz | Transmitter #3 had a problem after this shot which required extended power room access. After considerable time, it was decided that the problem could not be fixed in a reasonable time. Therefore the run will carry on without J-port (70 MHz). |
| Jul 21 2006 02:46:06:433PM | 1060721017 | Robert Granetz | Shot 17 -- Plasma. Good shot, full length. Lots of short H-modes. 2.2 MW from D+E. J-port is no longer working today. Next shot: no DPCS changes. Decrease 80 MHz RF power. |
| Jul 21 2006 03:18:17:650PM | 1060721019 | Robert Granetz | Shot 18 -- Plasma. Good shot, full length. 1.5 MW from D+E. Next shot: reduce Ip to 0.45 MA and nl_04 to 0.65e20 m-2. |
| Jul 21 2006 03:19:41:430PM | 1060721019 | Robert Granetz | Shot 19 -- Plasma. Good shot, full length. 0.45 MA, 4.5 T. Prf=1.0 MW, which was not enough to get an H-mode. Next shot: repeat, no DPCS changes. Increase RF power. |
| Jul 21 2006 03:39:40:703PM | 1060721020 | Robert Granetz | Shot 20 -- Plasma. Good shot, full length. 0.45 MA. Not sure we even had an H-mode. (Amanda thinks there was an H-mode.) Next shot: Enable an Ar/Ne puff (B-side-lower) from t=1.300 to 1.350 s for A. Graf. Also change RF timing. |
| Jul 21 2006 03:56:09:273PM | 1060721022 | Robert Granetz | Shot 21 -- Plasma. Good shot, full length. 0.45 MA. Prf=2.0 MW. Next shot: no DPCS changes |
| Jul 21 2006 04:06:42:213PM | 1060721022 | Robert Granetz | Shot 22 -- Plasma. Good shot, full length. Next shot: no DPCS changes. |
| Jul 21 2006 04:17:41:330PM | 1060721023 | Robert Granetz | Shot 23 -- Plasma. Good shot, full length. 0.45 MA. Prf=1.75 MW. Next shot: no DPCS changes. More RF power. |
| Jul 21 2006 04:32:10:413PM | 1060721024 | Robert Granetz | Shot 24 -- Plasma. Good shot, full length. 0.45 MA. Prf=2.9 --> 1.6 MW Next shot: reduce nl_04 to 0.5e20 m-2. |
| Jul 21 2006 04:45:58:543PM | 1060721025 | Robert Granetz | Shot 25 -- Plasma. Good shot, full length. Prf=2.8 MW. Next shot: no DPCS changes. |
| Jul 21 2006 04:53:03:093PM | 1060721026 | Robert Granetz | Shot 26 -- Plasma, but very short. May have been an impurity injection, but not obvious. Next shot: no changes. (last shot) |
| Jul 21 2006 05:02:58:800PM | 1060721027 | Robert Granetz | Shot 27 -- Plasma. Good shot, full length. RF power was linearly ramped to 2.6 MW. End of run |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 09:24:46:500AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 2 | 09:42:22:320AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 10:03:35:263AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 10:30:27:383AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 10:43:49:153AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 10:57:33:983AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 11:12:36:087AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 11:25:55:107AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 11:43:40:677AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 11:58:47:527AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 12:11:57:110PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 12:24:37:943PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 12:38:19:057PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 12:52:13:470PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 01:05:17:800PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 01:17:54:480PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 02:36:53:883PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 03:00:30:347PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 03:14:08:023PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 03:26:37:043PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 03:40:41:440PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 03:54:46:930PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 04:08:32:200PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 04:21:04:627PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 04:34:00:117PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 04:46:36:683PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 04:59:31:813PM | Plasma | Ok | |