| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Chuck Kessel |
| Physics operator(s): | Steve Wolfe |
| Engineering operator(s): | Andy Pfeiffer,Ed Fitzgerald |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| automatically entered by signon - please replace with real comment |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Jul 10 2007 02:35:33:643PM |
| Author: Chuck Kessel |
| MP492: Kessel, Hubbard, Bonoli, Lin, Parker, Terry, Schmidt, Wallace, Wilson, Wolfe, Wukitch
Toroidal Field: 5.4 T for ICRF Plasma Current: 0.60 MA (and 0.45 kA for 2nd day) Working Gas Species: D, H-minority. Density: Target 6-9e19 m-2 Cryopump: on standby to cool down in 30 minutes (He permitting) Equilibrium configuration (if possible, refer to database equilibria): slow Ip ramp discharges 1070412 at Ip = 600 kA listed below ICRF Power, pulse length, phasing: J-port essential, 1.0-2.0 MW. D and/or E desirable, 1 MW. LHCD Power, pulse length, phasing: 0.5-1.0 MW, variable phase (probably 90 deg, but also 120 deg), longest pulse available. Pellet Injection (species): no Impurity blow-off injection: no Diagnostic Neutral Beam: Highly desirable Special gas puffing: NINJA (with D2) should be available. Non-axisymmetric Coils (Connections, Current); Yes; optimized to reduce locked modes. Start with established discharge with slower Ip ramp: 1070412022 for 1000 ms rampup and early divert, at Ip = 600 kA. Adjust this discharge to get 500 ms rampup. 0) establish older discharge with flux loop correction 1) tune plasma position for ICRF and LH coupling at early times (200 ms) to allow effective heating (2 shots) (reference discharge has too large an outer gap at early times, and possibly also later times) 2) 500 ms rampup to 600 kA (4 shots) a. ICRF only, 1.0 MW at 500 ms b. ICRF only, 1.0 MW at 200 ms c. ICRF only, 2.0 MW at 500 ms d. ICRF only, 2.0 MW at 200 ms 3) 1000 ms rampup to 600 kA (4 shots) a. same as above but with 500 and 200 ms on times for ICRF 4) 500 ms rampup to 600 kA (2 shots) (LH: 90 deg phasing, possibility for 120 deg) a. LH only, (maximum available) 0.5 MW at 500 ms b. LH only, (maximum available) 0.5 MW at 200 ms 5) 1000 ms rampup to 600 kA (2 shots) (LH: 90 deg phasing, possibility for 120 deg) a. same as above but with 500 and 200 ms on times for LH 6) 500 ms rampup to 600 kA (2 shots) (LH: 90 deg phasing, possibility for 120 deg) a. ICRF 1.0-2.0 MW at 200 ms, LH 0.5-1.0 MW at 400 ms b. ICRF 1.0-2.0 MW at 400 ms, LH 0.5-1.0 MW at 600 ms 7) 1000 ms rampup to 600 kA (2 shots) (LH: 90 deg phasing, possibility for 120 deg) a. ICRF 1.0-2.0 MW at 200 ms, LH 0.5-1.0 MW at 400 ms b. ICRF 1.0-2.0 MW at 400 ms, LH 0.5-1.0 MW at 600 ms Start with established discharges with slower Ip ramps generated on previous day, to produce Ip = 450 kA. 1070412022 (or equivalent) can be used for the 500 ms rampup, by truncating the rampup. The 1000 ms ramp will have to be developed. Repeat sequence above. |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Entered: Jul 10 2007 04:30:33:387PM |
| Author: Steve Wolfe |
Physop Plan and Engineering setup for Wednesday, July 11, 2007 MP#492: Lower Ip Advanced Scenarios SL: Kessel, Hubbard PO: wolfe No overnight boronization! Overnight ECDC in D2 at 2e-4, sweep rmin/rdwell/rmax=44/45/103 tdwell/period = 20/60sec 60C bake Engineering setup: ------------------- Power systems as on 1070412022 (Note non-standard crowbar times) A-coil configuration standard (+Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot) enabled start time 0.2sec Gas setup: fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar Hybrid Enabled (PG1) leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) fill B-main (C-side) with 40 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3) fill NINJA with 10 psi D2 Enabled Enable the following gate valves and shutters, assuming no vacuum problems: ECE, VUV, DNB, Z-bolo shutters Torvac setup: Gate valves open ICRF: In RUN-ON by 08:00 (#1,2, and 4) LH: Ready for use later in run Physop Plan: ------------- Step 0: -------- The first trick will be to recover the startup from 1070412022, which dates from before the f10 loop died. This is a special startup with early current control and tweaks to supply voltages, so we can't just start from a recent segment 1. The major changes will be: RCUR offset from 1500 to 1000 -- This is most likely to cause issues BR0 to -.003 IC_EF4U leave at -1325, since Bz looks a little negative today Obviously, need to recalculate all the magnetics predictors in both segments 1 and 2. Following the SL plan, change the Ip program in seg2 to flattop at 600kA at 0.5sec. May want to move early RXL program from -.01 to -.03 or increase the early gain to get the xpoint off the inner nose. If there are significant problems with this, consider reverting to 1070412015. Note that pg2 (argon) puff was at 35ms; leave it like that until somebody complains, one way or the other. Step 1: Still with 600kA at 500ms, try optimizing ICRF target (outer gap) for early times. Step 2: Keep PCS program the same while ICRF timing and power are varied Step 3: Delay start of flattop to 1.0sec (like on shot 22) and repeat ICRF variations. Step 4: Back to 500ms start of flattop, possibly retune target for LH Step 5: back to 1.0sec SOF, more LH Step 6: Back to 500ms SOF, both ICRF and LH (* if possible, else go to 8) Step 7: Back to 1.0sec SOF, repeat ICRF + LH (* if possible) Step 8: If time remains, or we have to skip 6 and 7, begin 450kA experiments. First case would be 450kA at 0.5sec, which should look like just an earlier flattop on step 3. |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 12 2007 07:20:44:030AM |
| Author: Chuck Kessel |
| MP492 Slow Ip Rampup with ICRF and LH heating/CD
Discharge 1070412022 (1000 ms ramp to 600 kA) provided the reference for these experiments, and was used to generate the 500 ms rampup case. The plasma current was at 600 kA and Bt was at 5.4 T all day. ICRF heating included 1MW from J-port, 1 MW from D-port and 1 MW from E-port. LH (90 deg phasing co-CD) power reached 500 kW, with 400 kW more reliable in terms of avoiding trips. The goal of the experiments was to establish discharges with slower Ip ramps and varying timing and power levels of heating from both ICRF and LH. The 500 ms rampup case was setup quickly with an ohmic reference shot (003). Work was needed on the plasma position relative to the antenna and although the ICRF was working OK, smaller outer gaps with better contouring to the LH antenna were ongoing over several shots for the LH. The LH pulses were stretched out to about 900 ms. In addition, efforts to remove the lull (after 40 ms) in the Ip ramp after the first preprogrammed segment were attempted. A sequence was completed, 500 ms rampup to 600 kA a) 1.0 MW ICRF at 500 ms (005) b) 1.0 MW ICRF at 300 ms (actual on at 400 ms choppy and 500 ms clean) (006) c) 1.0 MW ICRF at 200 ms (008) d) 2.0 MW ICRF at 200 ms (010) e) 2.0 MW ICRF at 200 ms, 3.0 MW at 400 ms (got NSTAR thing going on) (011) f) 0.4 MW LH at 200 ms (012,013,015) g) higher power LH at 200 ms (backed off to 0.4 MW after these shots) (016,017) h) 1.0 MW ICRF and 0.4 MW LH at 200 ms (018) i) 1.0 MW ICRF and 0.4 MW LH at 200 ms, and 2.0 MW ICRF at 400 ms (019) j) 2.0 MW ICRF and 0.4 MW LH at 200 ms (020) 1000 ms rampup to 600 kA a) 2.0 MW ICRF at 200 ms b) 2.0 MW ICRF and 0.4 MW LH at 200 ms During the discharge the plasma was entering H-mode but not sustaining it (probably due to low density according to Hubbard and Hughes) even with only 1 MW of ICRF. Unfortunately the longest H-mode appeared in a discharge that disrupted (022). Each additional power notch (from ICRF and/or LH) caused a corresponding drop in the surface voltage and li. The sawtooth onset was being delayed significantly (compared to the normal onset at say 140 ms). Electron temperatures were reaching 3-3.5 keV under 2 MW of ICRF and LH and 2.5-3 under 2 MW of ICRF. A particular case with a long enough LH dropout showed that Te clearly dropped in its absence and recovered when the LH recovered. A cursory look at li indicated that the LH may have had a strong impact on li even at only 0.4 MW. We were successful on getting the ICRF and LH into the plasma simultaneously, the ICRF and LH pulses were long and pretty clean. There were some long delays associated with TF cooling, however we got 24 discharges and accomplished a lot of what we were after. Probably the only downside was that H-modes were not sustained since we would like to the higher edge Te and get the ICRF+LH working under these conditions. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 11 2007 06:50:59:780PM |
| Author: Steve Wolfe |
Physics Operator Summary for Wed. July 11, 2007
MP#492: Slow ramp AT scenarios
SL: Kessel
PO: wolfe
EO: Pfeiffer, Fitzgerald
A mixed day, with some progress on the MP. We also had some
delays and some problems with injections and disruptions, and
one (#11) possible NSTAR related issue with EFC, 3 MW ICRF and LH (into
dummy load). We didn't try 3MW again.
Toward the end of the day we had a few OH2 coax warnings, probably
because the shots were not double swinging the OH's. For Shot#22 we
implemented the late TF/OH inversion times and delayed fizzle settings,
although due to disruptions on the succeeding shots these were not
required. I recommend that tomorrow's run use these power supply
timings, from shot 1070711022, rather than those from the earlier
shots today, in order to avoid the coax warnings.
The first two shots were short and seemed to suffer from
vertical instability before 200ms. There had been a burst
of such on the original shot 1070412022. Small adjustments
to clearin reducing the early elongation seemed to improve
this to the point that shot#3 survived to full length. This
more or less completed step 0. Despite the reduced CLEARIN,
this shot and all the rest today were diverting nice and early,
between 0.16 and 0.18sec.
Unfortunately, after shot 3 the HEAT breaker tripped out due
to a bad thermocouple on the vessel and we ended up losing
two hours. First there was a long delay to reset the breaker,
fix the TC, and let the vessel come back up to temperature;
it got as low as -12C or so. Then the TF resistance value
would not come back down to its usual value required for the
cryo permissive. There was suspicion that the resistance temp
reading was invalid, although the values with the 5A supply
and the first-last turn with the PEI at 600A and at 3000A all
indicated higher than normal values. PEI values were around -149C
and the 5A supply gave -139C. Shot #4 was a no-power shot with
TF scanner, and it also indicated a first-last turn resistance
slightly higher than following the full magnet shot #3; this after
almost an hour of cooling. All the magnet arm tc's were reading
cold, <-170C by this time. We proceeded with a shot, with the
resistance reading around -153C at INIT. Subsequent exploration
indicated that increasing the CC cooling was capable of bringing
the TF resistance measurement down to its usual < -160C level,
at the expense of possibly overcooling the vessel and ports. There
were some indications of a small N2 leak on the RGA.
By the time we got to take shot#5, it was decided to increase the
Ip target at 0.1sec from 200kA to 300kA. The idea was to prevent
the flat or decreasing current waveform between the OH crowbar time
at 0.04sec and 0.10 sec, with the idea of recucing the high li.
This may have been successful, although it took a couple shots since
I initially forgot to increase the Ip gain starting at .04 sec.
Shot #5 also had ICRF, beginning step 1 and/or 2a.
Most of the rest of the physop's day was spent making shape tweaks to improve
the outer gap and later trying to match better to the top of the
LH grill. The LH grill probes were observed to be lighting up on the
video view, and later in the day there were some probe Isat warnings,
although the EFIT outer gap was not that small, >5mm after about shot
#11. While I don't necessarily trust the EFIT gaps with f10 and f11 gone,
this behavior is contrary to the earlier result in which EFIT seemed
to be claiming the gap to be smaller than it really was, as on 1070619.
I checked that this was not due to the new EFIT icalz setting by comparing
to a run of efit01 on 1070711024 using the old icalz value, which
showed insignificantly different outer gap (>1cm). Between shots 13 and
20 the RXU value was varied between -.02 and +.05 in an effort to
get higher density and better reflection coefficient at the top
of the LH grill. The results did not seem to make sense (at least to
me). In addition for all of the LH shots (beginning on #12) the LH
seemed to cause a density pumpout between .2 and .3sec.
We were successful in putting both LH (~.5MW) and ICRF(2MW) into the plasma
starting at 0.2sec, and combining the two, in the initial ramp case
with start of flattop at 0.5sec (600kA). We also got a very nice
long ramp case with start of flattop at 1.0sec and 2MW ICRF starting
at 0.2sec (shot#21). Shots 22 and 24 both had combined LH and ICRF
into the long ramp case but disrupted early, apparently due to
injections. Sawteeth were delayed in cases with both ICRF and with LH.
Some of these also had some interesting low-frequency (4,8,12kHz) MHD,
possibly tearing modes. Both the ICRF and LH seemed quite robust to
excessive trips at these levels, although at higher power the LH
began to fault.
There were UFO's and meteors all day on the video cameras, some
of which may have done us in. The H-modes were frequent, but mostly
short. None looked EDA'ish, but the target density was pretty low.
All the H-L's seemed to be radiative, some helped along by injections
during the h-mode. Since these shots all had early (<180ms) divertor,
this may be a counter-argument to the opinion that getting off the
limiter early is a cure for impurity problems.
It was interesting that despite the nice constant RF pulses starting
at 0.2sec, most of the H-modes did not come until much later in the
discharge.
Scorecard:
No power tests 1
Duds 1 (No TMX supplies)
Fizzles 2
Plasmas <200msec 3
Plasmas >200msec 17
================ ==
Shots 24
|
| Session Leader Comments |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Jul 11 2007 07:27:55:733AM | Steve Wolfe | Setting up for MP#492 experiment, using PCS from 1070412022 modified for broken flux loops Import Seg1 & seg2 from 1070412022 Call the predictors- Seg 1: Rcur - change offset from 1500 to 1000 zcur2, zcur3, zxl, bz_0, BR_0 - change offset from -.0007 to -.003 Ip (superfluous) Seg 2: rcur (all 3 rows) zcur2, zcur3 clearin rxl,zxl,rxu,zxu Program changes in seg2 (start=0.08) Ip SOF from 1.0 to 0.5sec Leave RXL for now. Seg1: PG4 from 25ms to 20ms Load at 11-Jul-2007 07:27:38.00 Open tree /home/wolfe/pcs_scratch -1 Open tree done | |
| Jul 11 2007 09:20:31:163AM | 1070711001 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#1: Trying to reproduce startup of 1070412022 but with a 500ms start of flattop. No RF or LH requested yet. Result: Short, but not a fizzle. Gets to about 180ms, looks like a vertical stability problem The old shot was close to having this problem too, but survived. I could back off on clearin, or increase rcur some. Since I want to get the outer gap down anyway, I'll try the latter. |
| Jul 11 2007 09:37:06:613AM | 1070711002 | Steve Wolfe |
Shot#2: MOve rcur point at .255s from .652 to .660 and
.374s from .65352 to .660
.543 from .6553 to .660
Leave clearin as is for now.
Another shorty. Something funny about the EFC current this time.
I think I'd better back off on clearin.
Breakdown looks ok, bz is a bit negative.
|
| Jul 11 2007 09:50:13:327AM | 1070711003 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#3: Drop clearin @.12 from .018 to .01 plasma full length. diverts around 180ms. Still a little dicey between 160 and 240ms on efc. Next: start tuning gaps a little |
| Jul 11 2007 10:08:49:310AM | 1070711003 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#4: clearin @.12sec from .01 to .008 rcur @.8 from .659 to .660 ZXL @.536 from +.044 to .02,.62 to .01 HEAT breaker tripped before this shot and had to be reset. Vessel temperature got down to -12C. Likely about a half-hour delay. |
| Jul 11 2007 11:28:01:247AM | 1070711004 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#4: clearin @.12sec from .01 to .008 rcur @.8 from .659 to .660 ZXL @.536 from +.044 to .02,.62 to .01 ** Change Ip demand to ask for 300kA at .1 sec instead of 200kA ** segments 1 and 2. late change per SL request. Shot#4 will be a no power cycle to get a TF scanner reading. There seems to be a problem with the TF resistance value at the PLC. |
| Jul 11 2007 12:10:01:810PM | 1070711005 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#5: Resistance reading still shows -153C, Jim says take the shot anyway. clearin @.12sec from .01 to .008 rcur @.8 from .659 to .660 ZXL @.536 from +.044 to .02,.62 to .01 ** Change Ip demand to ask for 300kA at .1 sec instead of 200kA ** segments 1 and 2. late change per SL request. plasma full length, H-mode from .63 to .9sec Early current still has the flat spot, probably because there's no gain on Ip until 70ms and then only at 1.0 instead of 4. Try moving rcur out earlier and turn Ip gain on sooner |
| Jul 11 2007 12:39:48:613PM | 1070711006 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#6: In seg1: Ip gain on at 1 at .04sec, to 4 at .06sec In seg2: first rcur point at .66 from .255sec to .18sec ICRF to fire at 300msec To INIT at -150C reading. Got runaways this time. plasma ran full length bounce in startup (12msec) Three h-modes, starting at 1sec. Did get less of a current pause after crowbar at .04sec outer gap is smaller, down to 2cm at 0.2sec, <1cm at .3sec RF didn't try to come on until .4sec, stayed on after .5sec |
| Jul 11 2007 12:55:14:080PM | 1070711007 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#7: pg 4 from 20 to 23msec, ic_ef4u from -1325 to -1310A rcur @.18sec from .660 to .6625 fizzle. Next: EF4 back to -1325 |
| Jul 11 2007 01:05:44:023PM | 1070711008 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#8: pg 4 from 20 to 23msec, ic_ef4u back to -1325 from -1310A rcur @.18sec from .660 to .6625 plasma, bounced again, one early runawau dump around 40msec RF on at .2sec, heating is clear on ece. H-modes at 1.2sec, outer gap goes to 1mm at .3sec Next: Increase RF to 2MW, try to flatten gap |
| Jul 11 2007 01:21:21:397PM | 1070711009 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#9: pg 4 from 23 to 25msec Add an rcur point at .25s,.659 fizzle. actually, made it to 200kA, but had bounced twice. Bz came up on this shot. Next: rcur offset from 1000 to 1300 |
| Jul 11 2007 01:37:00:330PM | 1070711010 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#10: rcur offset from 1000 to 1300 pg 4 still at 25msec Add an rcur point at .25s,.659 plasma full length, still has one early bounce RF ok at .2sec, 2MW; H-mode starts at 1.2sec outer gap back up to 4mm at .3sec, ends up at 1.5cm after .6sec I think the ZXL sweep is affecting this gap through the CLEARIN. Next: LH is complaining about probe ISAT at .3 sec and 1.7sec Need to open the gap more. |
| Jul 11 2007 01:59:20:643PM | 1070711011 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#11: MOve ZXL down to zero faster earlier; see if that gets rid of the small outer gap around 0.3sec. Move CLEARIN ramp in rampdown slower No startup changes. Disrupted at 0.8sec. Gap didn't change as much as I expected. On the plus side, no bounce. There was a trip on TMX on EFC-B, but that seems to be later. Not sure what happened. There are thrashes on zcur and efc starting at 0.7sec, but I don't know what's cause and what's effect. |
| Jul 11 2007 02:19:47:363PM | 1070711012 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#12: drop pg4 from 25 to 23msec Trying for LH at 0.2sec plasma full length. Got the LH ok, 400kW. Next: move XU up and out between .2 and .4 for LH coupling |
| Jul 11 2007 02:30:40:807PM | 1070711013 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#13: move ZXU up between .2 and .4 and RXU out from -.02 to 0 all through shot for LH coupling plasma ful length, LH on with no dropouts Next: try moving closer at top (still more) |
| Jul 11 2007 02:40:39:300PM | 1070711014 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#14: RXU from 0 to +.02, ZXU back down to 0 NO TMX supplies == DUD Next: try that again |
| Jul 11 2007 03:02:15:003PM | 1070711015 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#15: RXU from 0 to +.02, ZXU back down to 0 plasma full length, Still not close enough to top of grill |
| Jul 11 2007 03:17:35:993PM | 1070711016 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#16: RXU from +.02 to +.05 Move nl04=5e19 from .4 to .3sec plasma full length, som LH trips. Density at top of grill is higher this time. Next: repeat |
| Jul 11 2007 03:34:27:723PM | 1070711017 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#17: RXU back from .05 to .02 (Now he claims it may have been too close on 16) plasma full length, LH still tripping between .27 and .34 Now the density at the grill is higher by a factor of 10. There is something very screwy with that measurement. This one does have more gas coming in then. Next: ICRF + LH, no PCS change |
| Jul 11 2007 03:44:30:280PM | 1070711018 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#18: ICRF + LH, no PCS change plasma full length, with some fireworks. Something comes in at .8sec and gives a huge fast xray dump. h-mode at .38sec Next: raise ICRF, not LH |
| Jul 11 2007 03:57:12:523PM | 1070711019 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#19: ICRF + LH, no PCS change plasma full length, six h-modes LH has a couple of dropouts; ICRF ok in two steps Some injections throughout, Next: Move 2MW ICRF earlier |
| Jul 11 2007 04:09:57:237PM | 1070711020 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#20: ICRF + LH, no PCS change plasma full length, h-modes, sparks LH and ICRF on ok, one ICRF trip at .29 Next: go to the slow ramp? |
| Jul 11 2007 04:26:42:013PM | 1070711021 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#21: Move start of flattop to 1.0sec 2MW ICRF, LH off Alternator fault in INIT, cleared plasma full length. Got some h-modes late. ICRF looks clean. Stored energy ramps up with the current. rmidout no longer has overshoot. Got an oh2l coax warning. We're not double swinging. change invert times and fizzle gate. |
| Jul 11 2007 04:43:16:543PM | 1070711022 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#22: No PCS changes, ICRF and LH fizzle gate off to 2.1, tf and oh inverts to 2.3sec disrupted at .68sec, H-mode early, RF and LH both there. Doesn't look like a vertical or EFC problem this time. I think it's just a killer injection. |
| Jul 11 2007 04:46:22:187PM | 1070711023 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#23: No PCS changes, ICRF and LH at .2sec fizzle gate off to 2.1, tf and oh inverts to 2.3sec fizzle. Next: drop pg4 2ms (one shot late) |
| Jul 11 2007 05:15:18:660PM | 1070711024 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#24: drop pg4 2ms (one shot late) Allow pellet at 1.6sec Last shot today try for combined LH and ICRF in slow ramp case Disrupted at .9sec. ICRF and LH one short drop-out No long hmode this time. Still seems to be an injection, but I'm suspicious that it may be associated with the LH, since 21 didn't seem to have a problem. On 21,22, and 24 there seem to be low frequency MHD modes (tearing?) around 4kHz and harmonics(?). On 22 and 24 these are there and strong just before the disruption, on 21 they seem to go away during the H-modes after 1.1sec. No sign that they slow and lock at the disruption, but maybe they are contributory. |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 09:10:55:687AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 2 | 09:27:49:950AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 09:40:32:290AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 11:29:55:793AM | Test | Ok | |
| 5 | 11:59:05:333AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 12:32:00:640PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 12:46:14:540PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 12:59:03:143PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 01:11:39:653PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 01:24:28:100PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 01:41:54:863PM | Plasma | Bad | EFC Power Supply Problem during the Shot |
| 12 | 02:07:09:087PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 02:24:03:473PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 02:37:53:140PM | Plasma | Bad | We forgot to reset TMX beakers after an i2T fault |
| 15 | 02:53:49:927PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 03:07:21:020PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 03:22:48:637PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 03:35:56:587PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 03:49:11:080PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 04:02:02:540PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 04:14:36:223PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 04:31:10:750PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 04:43:56:153PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 04:56:33:630PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| System Availability | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jul 11 2007 09:10:31:093AM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jul 11 2007 09:27:26:997AM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jul 11 2007 11:29:36:823AM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||