| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Brian Labombard |
| Physics operator(s): | Earl Marmar |
| Engineering operator(s): | Bill Parkin,Bill Byford,Gary Dekow |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| MP493 Ohmic L-H Threshold Experiments SL: Brian LaBombard PO: Earl Marma |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Jan 23 2008 01:10:07:327PM |
| Author: Brian Labombard |
| Run Plan for 1080124
MP#493 "Ohmic L-H Threshold Experiments" Goal Investigate in detail the plasma conditions near the last-closed flux surface (pressure gradients, collisionality, plasma flows, ...) that are associated with ohmic L-H transitions. Approach We will "dial-up" some ohmic H-modes by the usual method of ramping the toroidal field down and then back up slightly after L-H transition. We will look at edge plasma flows and gradients just before and after transition with all available edge diagnositcs. In particular, we will be taking the time to optimize scanning probe insertion depths and times so as to cleanly resolve the velocity shear layer - this will involve taking some risks with the probes. Plan Start by reloading shot#1070710012. This was an NL04 = 0.75e20, Ip= 0.8 MA ohmic only shot with the desired TF rampdown, exhibiting an L-H transition at 1.0 s. If necessary, tweak ohmic H-mode start time and transition from ELM-free to EDA by adjusting TF ramp and starting density. A. 0.8 MA, LSN - 8 shots i. Optimize scanning probe plunge depths and scan times to record conditions just before (1 scan) and during H-mode (2 scans). ii. Scan probes to record conditions well before the L-H transition, while q95 is ramping down. B. 0.8 MA, USN - 2 shots Reload from shot #1071220010 (which ran on segment#3?). Then, program same plasma current, TF ramp and target density as in "A". Also, reduce inner gap by 1 mm and reduce the outer gap by 3 mm. i. Optimize scanning probe plunge depths and scan times to record conditions as q95 is ramping down (0.5, 0.75, 1.0 s) - make sure that the probes scan deep enough to resolve shear layer. C. 0.6 MA, LSN - 8 shots Go back to LSN discharge. Reprogram for 0.6 MA. Start the TF ramp-down earlier so as to attain ~2.2 tesla by 1.0s and then back up to 2.7 tesla. Program NL04 ~ 0.6 x10^20 m^-2. Optimize ohmic H-mode (start time, transition from ELM-free to EDA) by adjusting TF ramp and starting density. i. Optimize scanning probe plunge depths and scan times to record conditions just before (1 scan) and during H-mode (2 scans). ii. Optimize scanning probe plunge depths and scan times to record conditions well before the L-H transition, while q95 is ramping down. D. 0.6 MA, USN - 2 shots Reload a shot from "B" above. Program same plasma current, TF ramp and target density as in "C". i. Optimize scanning probe plunge depths and scan times to record conditions as q95 is ramping down (0.5, 0.75, 1.0 s) - make sure that the probes scan deep enough to resolve shear layer. E. 1.2 MA, LSN - 6 shots Back to LSN discharge, but with plasma current of 1.2 MA and toroidal field of 6 tesla. Program TF ramp-down to 4.4 tesla by 0.9s and then back up to 5.4 tesla. Program NL04 ~ 0.7 x10^20 m^-2. Optimize ohmic H-mode (start time, transition from ELM-free to EDA) by adjusting TF ramp and starting density. i. Optimize scanning probe plunge depths and scan times to record conditions just before (1 scan) and during H-mode (2 scans). F. 1.2 MA, USN - 2 shots Reload a shot from "D" above. Program same plasma current, TF ramp and target density as in "E". i. Optimize scanning probe plunge depths and scan times to record conditions as q95 is ramping down (0.5, 0.7, 0.9 s) - make sure that the probes scan deep enough to resolve shear layer. |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Entered: Jan 23 2008 05:25:24:027PM |
| Author: Earl Marmar |
| Engineering Setup
----------------- Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 17:00 MP493 Ohmic L-H Threshold Experiments SL: Brian LaBombard PO: Earl Marmar Power systems as on: 1070710012 Acoil: +Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot (standard) Hybrid Enabled Gas setup: Fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar Hybrid DISABLED (PG1) leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) fill B-main (C-side) with 40 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3) fill NINJA with 5 psi helium DISABLED Enable gatevalves and shutters: ECE, VUV, DNB, Z-bolo Torvac gatevalve toggle (yes/no): no Boronization(yes/no): no Overnight ECDC (yes/no): yes ICRF(yes/no): no LH(yes/no): no DNB(yes/no): yes (if available) Cryopump (yes/no): no Vessel temperature: 35/35/35 ------------------------------ ECDC Parameters ------------------------------ gas and pressure: D2 at 2e-4 Torr sweep: 44/45/103 cm scan: 20/120 s vessel temp: 60/60/60 |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jan 24 2008 10:38:40:377PM |
| Author: Brian Labombard |
| Run Summary for 1080124 MP#493 ""Ohmic L-H Threshold Experiments"" This was a very productive run, with only 4 shots out of 34 lost to fizzle, power supply dud or data system hang. We started out by reloading an ohmic H-mode shot from last July, 1070710012. On the first plasma attempt, the discharge was reproduced, being a virtual clone of the July shot. Shots 2-10 focussed on getting all three scanning probes (ASP, FSP, WASP) reaching the last closed flux surface in three separate scans (0.6, 0.8, 1.05 s) as the TF was ramped down to utlimately produce an ohmic H-mode (0.8 MA discharges). By shot #10, we managed to accomplish this goal. The probes recorded some clean n, Te profiles as well as parallel and perpendicular flow profiles. The velocity shear layer was well resolved, showing its characteristic jump-up towards the electron diamagnetic direction, just before reaching the last-closed flux surface (both in perpendicular Mach number and in the phase velocities of the fluctuations). No obvious changes in the shear layer were evident despite the different q values of 3.5, 3.1, and 2.6 in L-mode. Shots 11-17 were dedicated to recording the H-mode profiles by targeting the probes for a single scan just after the L-H transition. The ohmic H-modes were ELM-free and short-lived - a consequence of the boronization layer being worn off. But since the goal today was primarily focused on studying the L-mode conditions that spawn the H-mode, this behavior was acceptable. It took some patience, but shots 16 and 17 rewarded us with some nice profiles with ASP and FSP scanning as far as possible in ELM-free H-mode, resolving the shear layer. While the jump in perpendicular velocities looked about the same across the shear layer, the perpendicular scale length did look a bit shorter. The pressure and temperature scale lengths were extremely short, looking like the probe hit a 'wall' of hot plasma. In retrospect, it would have been interesting to probe some EDA H-modes to see if the shear layer relaxes a bit in this case, but this will have to be saved for another run, preferably after boronization. Also it would have been smart to get some outboard CXRS measurements of flows and rotation. But the DNB was off-line and under repair - another reason to try some of these discharges again. Istvan and Jim also puffed the NINJA at these discharges at various times, recording fluctuation phase velocity information from the GPI diode and camera systems. Shots 18-25 were an attempt to cover part B of the run plan, dialing up some matched USN discharges that were otherwise identical to the LSN ones. But, we failed to get any of these discharges to continue without disruption beyond about 1s, with no obvious reason why. Perhaps the low q (< 3) discharges are somehow incompatible with USN? Anyway, rather than bang our heads on this much further, we moved on to part C of the run plan - 0.6 MA LSN ohmic H-mode discharges. These went pretty well, yielding an L-H transition (actually many of them) when q dropped below 2.6. By shot 30, we got some very nice profile data in L-mode up to a time just prior to the first L-H transition. No H-mode profile data was taken, since our shot count was high and we wanted to look at some 1.2 MA discharges. Skipping part D (more USN discharges), we went right to part E (1.2 MA). Shots 31, 33, and 34 netted us some nice profile data, including shear layer information in the L-mode phase as q was ramped down, from 3.4 to 3.1 to 2.9. Running out of time, no data was taken in the H-mode phase or for part F of the MP (1.2 MA USN). The good news is that all scanning probes survived the run intact. (You may recall that we toasted all three scanning probes in the last attempt at this MP in July.) Moreover, the SW electrode on the WASP probe, which was exhibiting some intermittent opens earlier, worked perfectly on the last shot. While this MP is still not complete (need to fugure out the problems with the USN plasmas, record more H-mode profiles and get CXRS data), we certainly collected some very nice data today to chew on. ___________________________________________________________________________________ Quick shot log 01-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.06, NL04=0.65, no probes scanning 02-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.1, NL04=0.81, SP @ 0.6, 1.0, 1.2s, ASP(+4), FSP(-8), WASP (+2 rho) 03-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.14, NL04=0.75, SP @ 0.6, 1.05, 1.2s, ASP(+6), FSP(-5), WASP (+2 rho) 04-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.08, NL04=0.63, SP @ 0.6, 1.05, 1.2s, ASP(+7), FSP(-3), WASP (+0 auto) 05 - power test 06-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.06, NL04=0.62, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+7), FSP(-1), WASP (+0 auto) 07-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.24, NL04=0.8, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+8), FSP(+2), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) 08-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.25, NL04=0.85, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+8.5), FSP(+3), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) 09-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.1, NL04=0.62, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+8.5), FSP(+3), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) 10-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.03, NL04=0.54, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+8.5), FSP(+3), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) third scan in H-mode 11-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.15, NL04=0.62, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+8.5), FSP(+3), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) nice data, go to single scan during H-mode 12-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.125, NL04=0.64, SP @ 1.18s, ASP(+8.5), FSP(+3), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) ASP not deep enough, FSP too deep. 13-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, first L-H @ 1.02, NL04=0.67, SP @ 1.18s, ASP(+9), FSP(+1), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) EFH scan. ASP - excellent, FSP not deep enough. 14-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, first L-H @ 1.12, NL04=0.6, SP @ 1.18s, ASP(+9), FSP(+2), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) scan during H->L. FSP catches H going in, L coming out. 15-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, first L-H @ 1.13, NL04=0.6, SP @ 1.18s, ASP(+9), FSP(+2), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) scan during EFH. Nice data on FSP. ASP not deep enough. 16-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, first L-H @ 1.12, NL04=0.6, SP @ 1.18s, ASP(+10), FSP(+3), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) scan in EFH. ASP & FSP data look good. 17-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, first L-H @ 1.11, NL04=0.65, SP @ 1.16s, ASP(+10), FSP(+3), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) scan in EFH. ASP & FSP data look good. 18-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-3.3 disrupts at 0.94 19-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-3.5 disrupts at 0.86 20-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-3.3 disrupts at 0.925 21-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.9 disrupts at 1.08 22-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-3.4 disrupts at 1.08 23-no power 24-power supply dud 25-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-3.4 disrupts at .894 Punt on USN. go to LSN at 0.6 MA 26-LSN, Ip=0.6, drooping to 0.58, Bt=5.4-2.2, NL04=0.6, no probes scanning. no H-mode 27-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.2, first L-H @ 1.2 (q=2.6) NL04=0.55, SP @ 0.6, 1.0, 1.4s, ASP(+8), FSP(+0), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) Last scan in EFH 28-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.2, first L-H @ 1.12, NL04=0.47, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+9.5), FSP(+3), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) ASP ok, could be deeper. FSP not deep enough. 29-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.2, first L-H @1.2, NL04=0.54, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+11), FSP(+6), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) ASP a bit deep. FSP not deep enough. 30-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.2, first L-H @1.1, NL04=0.5, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+10.5), FSP(+7.5), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) Nice data on ASP and FSP 31-LSN, Ip=1.2, Bt=5.9-4.9, first L-H @0.97 (q=2.9) NL04=0.91, no probes scanning, disrupted at 1.5 s 32 - fizzle 33-LSN, Ip=1.2, Bt=5.9-4.5, first L-H @1.05, NL04=0.81, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 0.95s, ASP(+8), FSP(-3), WASP (+0 auto) ASP ok. FSP could be deeper. 34-LSN, Ip=1.2, Bt=5.9-4.5, first L-H @1.05, NL04=0.81, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.00s, ASP(+8), FSP(+0), WASP (+0 auto) Excellent data on ASP, FSP and WASP (even the SW electrode on the wasp was working!) |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Jan 24 2008 07:06:17:070PM |
| Author: Earl Marmar |
| This was a good run from the physop point of view. Initiation was reliable. Two shots were lost to engineering problems. In one case nothing fired (shot 23), attributed to an iogr problem. The following shot was missing several power supplies. There was also an event at the end of shot 4, when EF3 turned back on at 4.5 seconds and then the breaker pulled. This was followed by a successful EF3-only test.
Lower Single Null ohmic h-modes were explored at 600, 800 and 1200 kA. The attempts to get USN with toroidal field rampdowns in the up-down mirror shape were not successful, resulting in a series of shots that disrupted around 1 second. Steve Wolfe pointed out that these had outer strike point on the pumping slots, which might have caused a power handling issue, but this is unclear. Scorecard: Plasmas 30 fizzle 1 power supply dud 1 no power shot 1 test 1 Total cycles 34 |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Jan 24 2008 09:32:18:457AM | 1080124001 | Brian Labombard | 001 LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.06, NL04=0.65, no probes scanning Repeat with probes, NINJA, argon, and Li pellet at 1.5s |
| Jan 24 2008 09:54:24:013AM | 1080124002 | Brian Labombard | 002 LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.1, NL04=0.81, SP @ 0.6, 1.0, 1.2s, ASP(+4), FSP(-8), WASP (+2 rho) Repeat |
| Jan 24 2008 10:41:51:223AM | 1080124003 | Brian Labombard | 003 LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.14, NL04=0.75, SP @ 0.6, 1.0, 1.2s, ASP(+6), FSP(-5), WASP (+2 rho) repeat with probes deeper, lower density. |
| Jan 24 2008 10:45:29:807AM | 1080124004 | Brian Labombard | 004 LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.08, NL04=0.63, SP @ 0.6, 1.05, 1.2s, ASP(+7), FSP(-3), WASP (+0 auto) |
| Jan 24 2008 11:04:22:280AM | 1080124006 | Brian Labombard | 06-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.06, NL04=0.62, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+7), FSP(-1), WASP (+0 auto) |
| Jan 24 2008 11:13:28:057AM | 1080124007 | Brian Labombard | 07-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.24, NL04=0.8, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+8), FSP(+2), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) |
| Jan 24 2008 11:27:52:043AM | 1080124008 | Brian Labombard | 08-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.25, NL04=0.85, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+8.5), FSP(+3), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) |
| Jan 24 2008 11:53:13:180AM | 1080124009 | Brian Labombard | 09-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.1, NL04=0.62, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+8.5), FSP(+3), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) |
| Jan 24 2008 12:02:07:787PM | 1080124010 | Brian Labombard | 10-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.03, NL04=0.54, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+8.5), FSP(+3), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) third scan in H-mode |
| Jan 24 2008 12:34:07:557PM | 1080124012 | Brian Labombard | 12-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.125, NL04=0.64, SP @ 1.18s, ASP(+8.5), FSP(+3), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) Scan is during H-mode. FSP is too deep, ASP is not deep enough Try again |
| Jan 24 2008 12:49:40:933PM | 1080124013 | Brian Labombard | 13-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, first L-H @ 1.02, NL04=0.67, SP @ 1.18s, ASP(+9), FSP(+1), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) EFH scan. ASP - excellent, FSP not deep enough. |
| Jan 24 2008 12:54:37:347PM | 1080124014 | Brian Labombard | 14-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, first L-H @ 1.12, NL04=0.6, SP @ 1.18s, ASP(+9), FSP(+2), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) scan during H->L. FSP catches H going in, L coming out. |
| Jan 24 2008 01:19:54:860PM | 1080124015 | Brian Labombard | 15-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, first L-H @ 1.13, NL04=0.6, SP @ 1.18s, ASP(+9), FSP(+2), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) scan during EFH. Nice data on FSP. ASP not deep enough. |
| Jan 24 2008 01:20:15:830PM | 1080124016 | Brian Labombard | 16-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, first L-H @ 1.12, NL04=0.6, SP @ 1.18s, ASP(+10), FSP(+3), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) scan in EFH. ASP & FSP data look good. |
| Jan 24 2008 01:35:09:610PM | 1080124017 | Brian Labombard | 17-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, first L-H @ 1.11, NL04=0.65, SP @ 1.16s, ASP(+10), FSP(+3), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) scan in EFH. ASP & FSP data look good. go to USN next. |
| Jan 24 2008 03:58:01:853PM | 1080124026 | Brian Labombard | 26-LSN, Ip=0.6, drooping to 0.58, Bt=5.4-2.2, NL04=0.6, no probes scanning. no H-mode |
| Jan 24 2008 03:59:24:917PM | 1080124027 | Brian Labombard | 27-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.2, first L-H @ 1.2 (q=2.6) NL04=0.55, SP @ 0.6, 1.0, 1.4s, ASP(+8), FSP(+0), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) Last scan in EFH |
| Jan 24 2008 03:59:39:743PM | 1080124028 | Brian Labombard | 28-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.2, first L-H @ 1.12, NL04=0.47, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+9.5), FSP(+3), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) ASP ok, could be deeper. FSP not deep enough. |
| Jan 24 2008 04:16:30:733PM | 1080124029 | Brian Labombard | 29-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.2, first L-H @1.2, NL04=0.54, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+11), FSP(+6), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) ASP a bit deep. FSP not deep enough. |
| Jan 24 2008 04:46:58:050PM | 1080124030 | Brian Labombard | 30-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.2, first L-H @1.1, NL04=0.5, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+10.5), FSP(+7.5), WASP (+0 auto + 0.5V) Nice data on ASP and FSP |
| Jan 24 2008 04:49:08:240PM | 1080124031 | Brian Labombard | 31-LSN, Ip=1.2, Bt=5.9-4.9, first L-H @0.97 (q=2.9), NL04=0.91, no probes scanning, disrupted at 1.5 s |
| Jan 24 2008 06:23:47:990PM | 1080124033 | Brian Labombard | 33-LSN, Ip=1.2, Bt=5.9-4.5, first L-H @1.05, NL04=0.81, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 0.95s, ASP(+8), FSP(-3), WASP (+0 auto) ASP ok. FSP could be deeper. |
| Jan 24 2008 06:23:36:300PM | 1080124034 | Brian Labombard | 34-LSN, Ip=1.2, Bt=5.9-4.5, first L-H @1.05, NL04=0.81, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.00s, ASP(+8), FSP(+0), WASP (+0 auto) Excellent data on ASP, FSP and WASP (even the SW electrode on the wasp was working!) |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Jan 24 2008 09:20:05:100AM | 1080124001 | Earl Marmar | slight delay in the start of the run
TF cooling on one leg is lagging; should be ready soon |
| Jan 24 2008 09:30:59:580AM | 1080124001 | Earl Marmar | load from 1070710012 (ohmic H-mode, with TF decrease starting at .3 s)
call all magnetics predictors in segments 2, 3 and 4 import segment 1 from 1080123030 into segment 1 plasma startup had a bounce to the outside 4 ohmic H-modes (all ELM-free) |
| Jan 24 2008 09:41:08:170AM | 1080124002 | Earl Marmar | argon enabled, 75 msec puff starting at .325
Ninja also puffing LPI after 1.5 s plasma better startup very similar H-modes (4, ELM-free) post-LPI disruption at 1.52 s |
| Jan 24 2008 10:33:20:853AM | 1080124003 | Earl Marmar | argon puff to 100 msec, starting at 0.3 s
plasma first H-mode is a bit later post-LPI disruption |
| Jan 24 2008 10:27:12:160AM | 1080124004 | Earl Marmar | nl_04 target to .6e20 (from .65e20)
plasma first H-mode a little earlier post-LPI disruption EF3 came back on after 4.5 seconds, then the EF3 breaker pulled expect a delay while the engineers investigate |
| Jan 24 2008 10:41:35:723AM | 1080124005 | Earl Marmar | EF3 test under PLC control |
| Jan 24 2008 11:04:38:983AM | 1080124006 | Earl Marmar | repeat
plasma no LPI |
| Jan 24 2008 11:11:00:993AM | 1080124007 | Earl Marmar | added early ninja puff
plasma higher density; first H-mode delayed |
| Jan 24 2008 11:26:49:540AM | 1080124008 | Earl Marmar | turn off early ninja puff
plasma density intermediate between those from shots 6 and 7 first H-mode still later than we would like |
| Jan 24 2008 11:39:07:850AM | 1080124009 | Earl Marmar | nl_04 target to 5e19 (from 6e19)
plasma first H-mode is earlier |
| Jan 24 2008 12:13:24:800PM | 1080124010 | Earl Marmar | nl_04 target to 5.8e19
plasma survives the Li pellet |
| Jan 24 2008 12:13:13:657PM | 1080124011 | Earl Marmar | no pcs changes
plasma survives the Li pellet |
| Jan 24 2008 12:39:50:797PM | 1080124012 | Earl Marmar | no pcs changes
plasma |
| Jan 24 2008 12:39:40:563PM | 1080124013 | Earl Marmar | no pcs changes
plasma |
| Jan 24 2008 01:09:38:240PM | 1080124014 | Earl Marmar | no pcs changes
plasma |
| Jan 24 2008 01:09:48:690PM | 1080124015 | Earl Marmar | no pcs changes
plasma |
| Jan 24 2008 01:08:52:783PM | 1080124016 | Earl Marmar | no pcs changes
plasma |
| Jan 24 2008 01:23:33:190PM | 1080124017 | Earl Marmar | no pcs changes
plasma |
| Jan 24 2008 01:47:53:887PM | 1080124018 | Earl Marmar | go to USN
import 1071220010 segment 3 into segment 3 nl_04 target to 5.8e19 copy TF current waveform from shot 17 (ramp-down starting at .3 seconds) plasma lots of early MHD disrupt 0.9s (locked?) |
| Jan 24 2008 02:00:13:773PM | 1080124019 | Earl Marmar | slow the early density rise, nl_04 target to 5.519
plasma disrupts a little earlier |
| Jan 24 2008 02:22:32:743PM | 1080124020 | Earl Marmar | ZCUR TO +.004 (from 0)
nl_04 target to 5.9e19 plasma still disrupting before 1 second |
| Jan 24 2008 02:33:44:740PM | 1080124021 | Earl Marmar | nl_04 target to 7e19
plasma lasted a little longer |
| Jan 24 2008 03:23:04:720PM | 1080124022 | Earl Marmar | nl_04 target to 6e19
ramp TF down a little less (to 90 kA) disable argon plasma similar disruption time |
| Jan 24 2008 02:53:01:200PM | 1080124023 | Earl Marmar | start TF increase at .95 s (after rampdown)
no power; problem with iogr |
| Jan 24 2008 03:03:42:883PM | 1080124024 | Earl Marmar | try again
TF re-ramp starting at .95 s power supply dud no OH1, no EF1 |
| Jan 24 2008 03:22:30:513PM | 1080124025 | Earl Marmar | once more, with feeling
TF re-ramp starting at .95 s plasma no improvement, disrupt at .95 s |
| Jan 24 2008 03:23:25:530PM | 1080124026 | Earl Marmar | back to lower single null
segment 3 off segment 2 on Ip to 600 kA TF rampdown to 55kA, starting at .25s enable argon (100 msec, starting at .3 s) |
| Jan 24 2008 03:57:09:133PM | 1080124027 | Earl Marmar | nl_04 target to 5e19
TF rampdown to 55kA, starting at .2s program a slight ramp-up in Ip (to compensate a droop on shot 26) plasma 7 H-modes (ELM-free) |
| Jan 24 2008 03:57:24:540PM | 1080124028 | Earl Marmar | no pcs changes
plasma density is a bit lower 10 short H-modes |
| Jan 24 2008 04:31:40:953PM | 1080124029 | Earl Marmar | no pcs changes
plasma |
| Jan 24 2008 04:32:11:330PM | 1080124030 | Earl Marmar | no pcs changes
plasma |
| Jan 24 2008 04:47:31:470PM | 1080124031 | Earl Marmar | 1.2 MA
TF ramp up to 6 T, then down to 4.9 T nl_04 target to 8e19 plasma got h-modes disrupt just before 1.5 s hit various supply PLC limits |
| Jan 24 2008 04:47:06:017PM | 1080124032 | Earl Marmar | reduce prefill to 20 msec (from 24)
nl_04 target to 7e19 increase OH1 and EF3 PLC limits modify TF ramp (start down from 6 T at 0.5 s, go lower) start Ip rampdown at 1.4 s fizzle |
| Jan 24 2008 05:18:27:303PM | 1080124033 | Earl Marmar | no additional PCS changes
plasma multiple h-modes ramped down to 700 kA, then disrupted Power supplies look like they stayed within limits |
| Jan 24 2008 05:19:27:633PM | 1080124034 | Earl Marmar | no additional PCS changes
plasma multiple h-modes peaks up nicely after the pellet (which was injected into H-mode), then disrupts |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 09:20:38:303AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 2 | 09:33:43:210AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 09:54:19:450AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 10:12:20:110AM | Plasma | Ok | EF3 & UPS fault right after the shot |
| 5 | 10:38:56:707AM | Test | Ok | EF3 PLC test |
| 6 | 10:50:37:920AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 11:03:02:343AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 11:16:13:670AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 11:30:28:843AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 11:43:11:840AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 11:56:30:387AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 12:12:27:423PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 12:28:44:380PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 12:41:18:690PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 12:54:01:657PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 01:06:20:500PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 01:18:49:153PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 01:33:21:017PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 01:47:45:910PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 02:00:13:523PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 02:21:54:257PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 02:34:21:147PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 02:46:54:880PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 02:58:31:283PM | Plasma | Bad | EF1 and OH1 didn't fire. |
| 25 | 03:10:57:877PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 03:23:31:127PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 03:36:16:827PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 03:48:44:513PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 04:01:45:170PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 30 | 04:14:17:027PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 31 | 04:30:30:077PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 32 | 04:44:07:827PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 33 | 04:56:30:373PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 34 | 05:08:50:950PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| System Availability | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jan 24 2008 09:20:15:270AM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||