| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Brian Labombard |
| Physics operator(s): | |
| Engineering operator(s): | Andy Pfeiffer,Bill Cochran,Bill Byford |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| MP493 Ohmic L-H Threshold Experiments PB: MP477 Ohmic ITBs SL: Brian LaB |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Mar 12 2008 02:45:42:960PM |
| Author: Brian Labombard |
| Run Plan for 1080313 MP#493 ""Ohmic L-H Threshold Experiments"" Goal Investigate in detail the plasma conditions near the last-closed flux surface (pressure gradients, collisionality, plasma flows...) that are associated with ohmic L-H transitions. Approach We will ""dial-up"" some ohmic H-modes by the usual method of ramping the toroidal field down and then back up slightly after L-H transition. We will look at edge plasma flows and gradients just before and after transition with all available edge diagnositcs. In particular, we will be taking the time to optimize scanning probe insertion depths and times so as to cleanly resolve the velocity shear layer - this will involve taking some risks with the probes. We will also run some matched upper-null (USN) discharges to see if there are any differences in the flow and pressure gradient profiles that might hint as to why LSN discharges go into H-mode but USN ones do not. Plan Start by re-running shot#1080124009. This was a 0.8 MA LSN shot with a TF ramp-down: 5.4 tesla at 0.32 s, ramping down to 2.8 tesla by 1.15s and then back up to 3.5 tesla. NL04 was 0.61e20. We will spend a few shots optimizing the ohmic H-mode (start time, transition from ELM-free to EDA) by adjusting TF ramp and starting density. In particular, we wish to attain L-H transitions at slightly higher q95 and NL04 than on 1080124, which should push the H-mode towards the EDA regime. Hopefully the overnight boronization will minimize the radiated power fraction, enabling higher-density ohmic L-H transitions. The higher q95 may also help us avoid q95 ~ 3 disruptions that have tended to occur during the matched USN dishcarges (part B below). A. 0.8 MA, LSN - 8 shots Re-run shot#1080124009 i. Optimize scanning probe plunge depths and scan times to record the evolution of conditions before the L-H transition while q95 is ramping down. The last probe scan should ideally occur just before the L-H transition. The probes will probably need a few shots to clean off the boronization layer. B. 0.8 MA, USN - 6 shots Reload from shot #1080124018 (which ran on segment#3). Make the following program changes: - Program the same: (1) plasma current, (2) TF ramp and (3) target density as in ""A"". - Decrease R_XL by 4.0 cm - Increase Z_XL by 0.5 cm - Decrease R_XU by 1.5 cm - Decrease right gap by 0.3 cm These changes should make the plasma shape look like an up-down mirror reflection of LSN the discharges in ""A"". i. Optimize scanning probe plunge depths and scan times to record conditions as q95 is ramping down. Make sure that the probes scan deep enough to resolve shear layer. C. 0.8 MA, LSN, EDA - 4 shots i. If a steady EDA phase was obtained in ""A"" then reload the best shot from ""A"". Optimize scanning probe plunge depths and scan times to record the edge flow shear layer during EDA. D. 0.6 MA, LSN - 6 shots Reload best LSN shot from ""A"". Make the following changes: - Program Ip=0.6 MA - Reduce NL04 by 0.1e20 - Extend TF rampdown in time to reach 2.4 tesla at same ramp rate (~ -3 tesla/s). Keep the subsequent TF ramp-up the same. Optimize ohmic H-mode (start time, transition from ELM-free to EDA) by adjusting TF ramp and starting density. i. Optimize scanning probe plunge depths and scan times to record the evolution of conditions before the L-H transition while q95 is ramping down. The last probe scan should ideally occur just before the L-H transition. E. 0.6 MA, USN - 2 shots Reload the best USN shot from ""B"" above. Program same plasma current, TF ramp and target density as in ""D"". i. Optimize scanning probe plunge depths and scan times to record conditions as q95 is ramping down. Make sure that the probes scan deep enough to resolve shear layer. F. 1.2 MA, LSN - 6 shots Reload best LSN shot from ""A"". Make the following changes: - Program Ip=1.2 MA - Increase NL04 by 0.1e20 - Load TF programming from 1080124034 (segment #2). This has a ramp-up to 6 tesla followed by a ramp-down and hold at 4.5 tesla. Change programming to ramp back up to 5.4 tesla as soon as 4.5 tesla is achieved. Optimize ohmic H-mode (start time, transition from ELM-free to EDA) by adjusting TF ramp and starting density. i. Optimize scanning probe plunge depths and scan times to record the evolution of conditions before the L-H transition while q95 is ramping down. The last probe scan should ideally occur just before the L-H transition. G. 1.2 MA, USN - 2 shots Reload the best USN shot from ""B"" above. Program same plasma current, TF ramp and target density as in ""F"". i. Optimize scanning probe plunge depths and scan times to record conditions as q95 is ramping down. Make sure that the probes scan deep enough to resolve shear layer. |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Entered: Mar 12 2008 12:18:56:680PM |
| Author: Ron Parker |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --
Engineering Setup for Thursday 13 Mar 2008 ----------------- MP493 Ohmic L-H Threshold Experiments PB: MP477 Ohmic ITBs SL: Brian LaBombard PO: Ron Parker ** Overnight boronization required ** ------------------------------ Boronization Parameters ------------------------------ rmin/rdwell/rmax: 60/75/80 cm tdwell/tsweep: 60/120 s ~60 mTorr foreline pressure EF4 current: 200 A Post boronization ECDC in He, then D2 ------------------------------ ECDC Parameters ------------------------------ gas and pressure: D2 at 2e-4 Torr sweep: 44/45/103 cm scan: 20/120 s Vessel temperature: 35/35/35 Run will start at 09:00 and end at 17:00. Power systems as on: 1080124009 Acoil: +Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot (standard) Hybrid Enabled Gas setup: Fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar Hybrid DISABLED (PG1) leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) fill B-main (C-side) with 40 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3) fill NINJA with 10 psi deuterium DISABLED Enable gatevalves and shutters: ECE, VUV, DNB, Z-bolo Key Diagnostics: Scanning probes (ASP, FSP, WASP), CXRS systems (with NINJA and DNB), GPI, Edge Thomson, HIREXs Torvac setup: keep gate valves open No ICRF No LH Yes DNB No Cryopump Physop plan: ------------ Setup for first plasma: Load from shot#1080124009 with no changes (apart from startup). This was a 0.8 MA LSN shot with a TF ramp-down: 5.4 tesla at 0.32 s, ramping down to 2.8 tesla by 1.15s and then back up to 3.5 tesla. NL04 was 0.61e20. We will spend a few shots optimizing the ohmic H-mode (start time, transition from ELM-free to EDA) by adjusting TF ramp and starting density. See session leader plan for remaining shots. |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Mar 13 2008 10:31:17:030PM |
| Author: Brian Labombard |
| Run Summary for 1080313
MP#493 ""Ohmic L-H Threshold Experiments"" The run went very well, producing many ohmic H-modes. In fact, we found it difficult not to produce ohmic H-modes today. The boronization was very effective in reducing the radiated power, leading to H-mode transitions that quickly evolved into EDA. The toroidal-field ramp-down method of producing ohmic H-modes appears to be much more robust than previously thought. First we got some nice EDA H-modes leading to ITBs in LSN plasmas (0.8 MA). Probes were scanned to look at the edge shear layer. Then we went and dialed up some USN discharges with the intent of looking for differences in the edge shear layer in discharges that do not go into H-mode, but are otherwise matched in current, field and density. To our surprise, these discharges also exhibited an ohmic L-H transition followed by ITB at about the same time in the shot! We thought that we might be able to turn on the argon puff for the HIREX systems. However, we found that even a small (75 ms, shot#7) puff lead to a significant increase in radiated power, impurity accumulation and change in H-mode character to Elm-free with no following ITB. For this reason, we left the argon off for the rest of the day. This was an unfortunate necessity because it meant the we could not get any HIREX L-H rotation data. We spent some time poking at EDA H-modes with the scanning probes to record the shear layer. Large amplitude QCM signals were seen on the scanning probes. The phase velocities of the QCM were found to be very similar to the broadband turbulence prior to the H-mode. Ohmic H-modes were also studied at 0.6 MA in LSN and USN. Again, an ohmic L-H transition (EDA followed by ITB) was seen in USN at about the same time as in LSN. Finally, we were unsuccessful in finishing the 1.2 MA LSN/USN comparison, obtaining just a single 1.2 MA shot in LSN. By the way - the Ohmic L-H transition at 1.2 MA occurred at 5.3 tesla; no field ramp-down was required. The DNB was operated today and performed very well with beam currents approached 7 amps with few trips (Bob was very proud). This bodes well for obtaining some outer CXRS flow information in these ohmic L and H-modes. NINJA puffing was use extensively across the L-H transitions today, with data being recorded on fast-diodes, cameras, and gas-puff CXRS systems. ___________________________________________________________________________________ Quick shot log 01-LSN, early disruption 02-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-mode, NINJA puff at 0.9, no probes scanning 03-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.176, NL04=0.9, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+7), FSP(-7), WASP EDA H-mode, Catherine reports weak ITB 04-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.18, NL04=0.86, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+7), FSP(-4), WASP EDA H-mode, Catherine reports another weak ITB 05-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.22, NL04=0.88, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.15s, ASP(+7), FSP(-1), WASP EDA H-mode 06-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.08, NL04=0.72, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.15s, ASP(+7), FSP(+1), WASP last scan in H-mode, EDA H-mode, ITB, central Thomson ramps up over 6e20 07-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.15, NL04=0.87, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+7), FSP(+2), WASP good probe targeting, a couple of EFHs, Prad is up from argon puff 08-USN, early disruption 09-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, NL04=0.7, no probes scanning 10-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.1, NL04=0.88, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+5), FSP(+2), WASP Ohmic H-mode and ITB!! in USN! 11-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.1, NL04=0.81, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+5), FSP(+2), WASP Another ohmic H-mode and ITB in USN 12-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.11, NL04=0.87, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+5), FSP(+2), WASP Another ohmic H-mode and ITB in USN 13-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, NL4=0.75, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+6), FSP(+4), WASP disrupts just after thrid probe scan 14-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.13, NL4=0.82, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+6), FSP(+4), WASP Another ohmic H-mode and ITB in USN, ASP FSP records high frequency (~10 kHz) oscillation on third scan. 15-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.11, NL4=0.80, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+5.5), FSP(+4), WASP Another ohmic H-mode and ITB in USN 16-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.07, NL04=0.64, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+7), FSP(+2), WASP Elm-free 17-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.0, NL04=0.74, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+8), FSP(+2), WASP L,L,EFH to EDA 18-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 0.9, NL04=0.75, no probes scanning EFH to EDA 19-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 0.87, NL04=0.84, SP @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.2s, ASP(+7)-not scanning, FSP(+2), WASP L,EFH,EFH to EDA 20-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 0.87, NL04=0.83, SP @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.2s, ASP(+6), FSP(+1), WASP L,EFH to EDA 21-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 0.9, NL04=0.84, SP @ 1.2s, ASP(+8), FSP(+3), WASP EDA, ASP could be deeper, FSP is too deep. 22-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 0.9, NL04=0.82, SP @ 1.2s, ASP(+9), FSP(+2), WASP EDA, ASP too deep, FSP is ok. 23-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 0.87, NL04=0.83, SP @ 1.2s, ASP(+8.5), FSP(+2), WASP EDA, ASP & FSP data ok 24- early disruption 25- early disruption 26-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-mode, no probes scanning 27-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.4, L-H @ 1.4, NL04=0.71, SP @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.2s, ASP(+8), FSP(+2), WASP 28-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.4, L-H @ 1.27, NL04=0.6, SP @ 0.7, 1.0, 1.3s, ASP(+9), FSP(+3), WASP L,L, EFH 29-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.4, L-H @ 1.27, NL04=0.65, SP @ 0.7, 1.0, 1.2s, ASP(+9), FSP(+3), WASP good targeting 30-USN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.4, L-H @ 1.27, NL4=0.70, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.2s, ASP(+5.5), FSP(+4), WASP 31-USN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.27, NL04=0.68, SP @ 0.7, 1.0, 1.2s, ASP(+7), FSP(+6), WASP 32-LSN, Ip=1.2, Bt=5.9-4.5, first L-H @0.84, NL04=0.91, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.00s, ASP(+6), FSP(-3), WASP L, L, EDA 33- early disruption 34-strong fizzle |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Mar 13 2008 05:38:18:830PM |
| Author: Ron Parker |
| The machine performed well today. Although there were many disruptions, most were "intentional", as they were caused by Li pellet injection near the end of the shot.
There were no machine nor data system failures. After shot 9, the power room was briefly entered on suspicion of a burning smell, but nothing was found. The run plan called for dynamic TF field variations and a variety of currents and densities. All shots were Ohmic only. A surprising result was the production of upper-null, Ohmic H-modes with threshold well below that expected based on ITER scaling. See SL summary. Scorecard: 34 plasma attempts, 12 disruptions before rampdown (but 4 still satisfactory for run objectives), 17 full length shots, and 5 disruptions during rampdown (also satisfactory for run objectives.) No duds, nor fizzles. |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Mar 13 2008 09:35:07:270AM | 1080313002 | Brian Labombard | 02-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-mode, NINJA puff at 0.9, no probes scanning Next: repeat with prohes scanning, NL04 = 0.6 |
| Mar 13 2008 09:48:34:660AM | 1080313003 | Brian Labombard | 03-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.176, NL04=0.9, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+7), FSP(-7), WASP EDA H-mode, Catherine reports weak ITB Next: repeat with probes deeper, NL04 progam at 0.55 |
| Mar 13 2008 10:02:14:737AM | 1080313004 | Brian Labombard | 04-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.18, NL04=0.85, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+7), FSP(-4), WASP EDA H-mode, Catherine reports another weak ITB Repeat: probes deeper, NINJA later |
| Mar 13 2008 10:14:54:723AM | 1080313005 | Brian Labombard | 05-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.22, NL04=0.88, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.15s, ASP(+7), FSP(-1), WASP EDA H-mode Next: repeat, probes deeper. |
| Mar 13 2008 10:26:48:910AM | 1080313006 | Brian Labombard | 06-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.08, NL04=0.72, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.15s, ASP(+7), FSP(+1), WASP EDA H-mode, ITB, central Thomson ramps up over 6e20 Next: repeat with different probe timing, argon on. |
| Mar 13 2008 10:39:27:987AM | 1080313007 | Brian Labombard | 07-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.15, NL04=0.87, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+7), FSP(+2), WASP good probe targeting, a couple of EFHs, Prad is up from argon puff Next: go to USN, no probes scanning |
| Mar 13 2008 11:24:40:720AM | 1080313009 | Brian Labombard | 09-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, NL04=0.7, no probes scanning Touching on inner nose Next: repeat with RX_L change |
| Mar 13 2008 11:51:27:893AM | 1080313010 | Brian Labombard | 10-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.1, NL04=0.88, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+5), FSP(+2), WASP Ohmic H-mode and ITB!! in USN! |
| Mar 13 2008 12:06:33:597PM | 1080313011 | Brian Labombard | 11-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.1, NL04=0.81, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+5), FSP(+2), WASP Another ohmic H-mode and ITB in USN |
| Mar 13 2008 12:23:59:113PM | 1080313012 | Brian Labombard | 12-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.11, NL04=0.87, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+5), FSP(+2), WASP Another ohmic H-mode and ITB in USN |
| Mar 13 2008 12:24:37:427PM | 1080313013 | Brian Labombard | 13-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, NL4=0.75, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+6), FSP(+4), WASP disrupts just after third probe scan Repeat with FSP pulled out 2mm |
| Mar 13 2008 12:49:09:720PM | 1080313014 | Brian Labombard | 14-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.13, NL4=0.82, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+6), FSP(+4), WASP Another ohmic H-mode and ITB in USN, ASP FSP records high frequency (~10 kHz) oscillation on third scan. |
| Mar 13 2008 01:07:33:613PM | 1080313015 | Brian Labombard | 15-USN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.11, NL4=0.80, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+5.5), FSP(+4), WASP Another ohmic H-mode and ITB in USN Next: go to LSN |
| Mar 13 2008 01:08:21:080PM | 1080313016 | Brian Labombard | 16-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.07, NL04=0.64, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+7), FSP(+2), WASP Elm-free Next: higher density |
| Mar 13 2008 01:24:21:473PM | 1080313017 | Brian Labombard | 17-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.0, NL04=0.74, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.05s, ASP(+8), FSP(+2), WASP L,L,EFH to EDA Next: move Bt ramp-down to earlier time (by 100 ms) |
| Mar 13 2008 01:36:04:270PM | 1080313018 | Brian Labombard | 18-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 0.9, NL04=0.75, no probes scanning EFH to EDA Next: Increase NL04 by 0.05, scan probes |
| Mar 13 2008 01:54:50:597PM | 1080313019 | Brian Labombard | 19-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 0.87, NL04=0.84, SP @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.2s, ASP(+7)-not scanning, FSP(+2), WASP L,L,EFH to EDA |
| Mar 13 2008 02:19:43:817PM | 1080313020 | Brian Labombard | 20-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 0.87, NL04=0.83, SP @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.2s, ASP(+6), FSP(+1), WASP L,EFH to EDA |
| Mar 13 2008 02:20:02:190PM | 1080313021 | Brian Labombard | 21-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 0.89, NL04=0.87, SP @ 1.2s, ASP(+8), FSP(+3), WASP EDA, ASP could be deeper, FSP is too deep. Next: repeat |
| Mar 13 2008 02:30:39:063PM | 1080313022 | Brian Labombard | 22-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 0.9, NL04=0.82, SP @ 1.2s, ASP(+9), FSP(+2), WASP EDA, ASP too deep, FSP is ok Next: repeat |
| Mar 13 2008 02:53:21:363PM | 1080313023 | Brian Labombard | 23-LSN, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 0.87, NL04=0.83, SP @ 1.2s, ASP(+8.5), FSP(+2), WASP EDA, ASP & FSP data ok Next: go to 0.6 MA, LSN |
| Mar 13 2008 03:21:29:873PM | 1080313026 | Brian Labombard | 26-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-mode, no probes scanning |
| Mar 13 2008 03:43:41:313PM | 1080313027 | Brian Labombard | 27-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.4, NL04=0.71, SP @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.2s, ASP(+8), FSP(+2), WASP |
| Mar 13 2008 03:52:46:080PM | 1080313028 | Brian Labombard | 28-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.8, L-H @ 1.27, NL04=0.6, SP @ 0.7, 1.0, 1.3s, ASP(+9), FSP(+3), WASP L,L, EFH |
| Mar 13 2008 04:25:28:920PM | 1080313029 | Brian Labombard | 29-LSN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.4, L-H @ 1.27, NL04=0.65, SP @ 0.7, 1.0, 1.2s, ASP(+9), FSP(+3), WASP good targeting |
| Mar 13 2008 04:25:53:063PM | 1080313030 | Brian Labombard | 30-USN, Ip=0.6, Bt=5.4-2.4, L-H @ 1.27, NL4=0.70, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.2s, ASP(+5.5), FSP(+4), WASP could be deeper |
| Mar 13 2008 05:25:32:063PM | 1080313032 | Brian Labombard | 32-LSN, Ip=1.2, Bt=5.9-4.5, first L-H @0.84, NL04=0.91, SP @ 0.6, 0.8, 1.00s, ASP(+6), FSP(-3), WASP L, L, EDA |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Mar 13 2008 08:38:06:893AM | 1080313001 | Ron Parker | Good morning!. All systems go for a prompt start. |
| Mar 13 2008 08:53:00:520AM | 1080313001 | Ron Parker | There will be a short delay for cell access before run begins. |
| Mar 13 2008 09:15:06:707AM | 1080313001 | Ron Parker | Shot 1 disrupted very early, 20 ms.
Good breakdown, gas pulse looks about right. |
| Mar 13 2008 09:30:19:380AM | 1080313002 | Ron Parker | Shot 2 started up well,and ran full length. |
| Mar 13 2008 09:41:22:893AM | 1080313003 | Ron Parker | Shot 3 ran OK, H-Mode developed at 1.2 s. |
| Mar 13 2008 09:56:19:080AM | 1080313004 | Ron Parker | Shot 4 ran full length. Ohmic H-modes continue to develop. |
| Mar 13 2008 10:14:13:597AM | 1080313005 | Ron Parker | Shot 5 continued the trend -- full length. |
| Mar 13 2008 10:20:43:940AM | 1080313006 | Ron Parker | Shot 6 ran, disrupted on the current rampdown -- density limit disruption? |
| Mar 13 2008 10:23:03:427AM | 1080313006 | Ron Parker | Next shot will have 75 ms of Argon, beginning at 0.3 s. |
| Mar 13 2008 10:31:15:517AM | 1080313007 | Ron Parker | Shot was OK, disrupting in rampdown at ~ 350 kA. |
| Mar 13 2008 10:50:49:270AM | 1080313007 | Ron Parker | Next shot: Moving to Upper Null -- see SL run plan. |
| Mar 13 2008 10:57:19:473AM | 1080313008 | Ron Parker | Shot 8 didn't get very far -- used startup from 1080124018 and disrupted at ~ 45 ms. Not clear why. Resume startup from 1080313007 for next shot. |
| Mar 13 2008 11:15:17:380AM | 1080313009 | Ron Parker | Shot 9 ran full lenght, lower X-point looks like its too far inside.
For next shot reduce RXL from -5 cm to -2 cm. |
| Mar 13 2008 11:16:43:910AM | 1080313009 | Ron Parker | Ooops, computer glitch after shot 9. While it's being looked at, power room entry. |
| Mar 13 2008 11:25:13:173AM | 1080313009 | Ron Parker | Delay in the action. Suspicious smell detected in power room. Probably not anthropogenic. |
| Mar 13 2008 11:31:41:410AM | 1080313009 | Ron Parker | No problem found. Ready for shot. |
| Mar 13 2008 11:56:27:207AM | 1080313010 | Ron Parker | Shot 10 ran full length. Upper null Ohmic H-mode! |
| Mar 13 2008 11:55:06:330AM | 1080313011 | Ron Parker | Shot 11 went full length. |
| Mar 13 2008 12:13:50:563PM | 1080313012 | Ron Parker | Shot 12 ran full length. Another Upper Null Ohmic H-mode. |
| Mar 13 2008 12:28:17:063PM | 1080313013 | Ron Parker | Shot 13 disrupted because probe was inserted too deep. |
| Mar 13 2008 12:42:58:690PM | 1080313014 | Ron Parker | Shot 14 ran full length
|
| Mar 13 2008 12:49:32:880PM | 1080313015 | Ron Parker | Shot 15 disrupted at ~ 1.52 s -- no apparent cause. |
| Mar 13 2008 12:51:45:800PM | 1080313015 | Ron Parker | Next: Replay of shot 1080313007. |
| Mar 13 2008 01:01:48:817PM | 1080313016 | Ron Parker | Back to lower null on Shot 16, but it disrupted beginning around 1.4 s. |
| Mar 13 2008 01:11:35:847PM | 1080313017 | Ron Parker | Shot 17 ran more or less full length, although it struggled on the way down. |
| Mar 13 2008 01:32:37:690PM | 1080313018 | Ron Parker | Shot 18 ran OK, disrupting on current rampdown. |
| Mar 13 2008 01:42:45:143PM | 1080313019 | Ron Parker | Shot 19 ran OK; fairly long Ohmic H-mode. |
| Mar 13 2008 01:54:30:143PM | 1080313019 | Ron Parker | Next shot: reduce outer gap by 2 mm, with no change on RCUR. |
| Mar 13 2008 01:56:24:223PM | 1080313020 | Ron Parker | Shot 20 ran almost full length, struggling on the rampdown (pellet fragments?) |
| Mar 13 2008 02:16:39:393PM | 1080313021 | Ron Parker | Shot 21 started well, ran well, but disrupted at ~1.52 s |
| Mar 13 2008 02:31:58:927PM | 1080313022 | Ron Parker | Shot 22 ran well, then disrupted due to pellet injection. |
| Mar 13 2008 02:51:15:080PM | 1080313023 | Ron Parker | Shot 23 again disrupted due to pellet, but after SL's data were recorded. |
| Mar 13 2008 02:52:53:987PM | 1080313024 | Ron Parker | Shot 24 never got to programmed current, disrupting at 20-25 ms.
Probably cummulative effect of pellet-induced, full current disruptions. |
| Mar 13 2008 03:06:09:413PM | 1080313025 | Ron Parker | Another disruption, this one at 360 ms. |
| Mar 13 2008 03:16:40:730PM | 1080313026 | Ron Parker | Shot 26 ran full length. |
| Mar 13 2008 03:20:03:077PM | 1080313026 | Ron Parker | On shot 26, TF rampdown was not long enough, so on next shot it will be extended by 150 ms. |
| Mar 13 2008 03:31:10:797PM | 1080313027 | Robert Granetz | Granetz taking over for Ron prior to this shot. Tweak CLEARIN and RCUR to decrease inner gap by 1.5 mm by the end of the flattop (i.e. ramping during the flattop) without changing the outer gap. |
| Mar 13 2008 03:43:19:360PM | 1080313027 | Robert Granetz | Shot 27 -- Plasma. Good shot. Gaps are acceptable. Next shot: no DPCS changes |
| Mar 13 2008 03:54:35:687PM | 1080313028 | Robert Granetz | Shot 28 -- Plasma. Got an ELMfree H-mode late in the Ip flattop. Next shot: no DPCS changes |
| Mar 13 2008 04:11:31:330PM | 1080313029 | Robert Granetz | Shot 29 -- Plasma. Good shot. Next shot: switch back to upper null, based on seg 3 from shot 15, except load Btor, Ip, and nl_04 programming from this shot (29). |
| Mar 13 2008 04:18:58:407PM | 1080313030 | Robert Granetz | Shot 30 -- Plasma. Upper null. Got a short H-mode. Next shot: no DPCS changes |
| Mar 13 2008 04:33:35:063PM | 1080313031 | Robert Granetz | Shot 31 -- Plasma. Good shot. Upper null. Short H-mode. Next shot: reload seg 2,3,4 from 1080124034 (1.2 MA, Bt ramps to 6 T and then back to 5.4 T) |
| Mar 13 2008 04:47:07:453PM | 1080313032 | Robert Granetz | Shot 32 -- Plasma. 1.2 MA; disrupted at t=1.43 s because it went into an ELMfree H-mode and the density just kept climbing. Btor went up to 6 T and then ramped down to 4.5 T. Next shot: reduce pre-fill by 4 ms (disruption recovery) |
| Mar 13 2008 04:51:51:610PM | 1080313033 | Robert Granetz | Shot 33 -- Plasma, but disrupted very early. Looks like an injection. Next shot: reduce pre-fill pulse by 2 ms and try again. This will be the last shot. |
| Mar 13 2008 05:07:16:343PM | 1080313034 | Robert Granetz | Shot 34 -- Plasma/fizzle. Got to 100 kA when something hit it at t=24 ms. End of run |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 09:11:04:770AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 2 | 09:23:59:173AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 09:36:29:487AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 09:49:50:377AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 10:02:24:440AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 10:14:46:317AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 10:27:22:050AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 10:49:55:737AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 11:02:58:613AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 11:32:49:330AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 11:49:56:720AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 12:02:28:080PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 12:15:06:630PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 12:27:36:880PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 12:42:19:033PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 12:55:01:130PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 01:07:26:597PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 01:23:28:143PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 01:35:55:673PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 01:53:36:520PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 02:06:19:690PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 02:19:39:550PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 02:32:17:690PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 02:46:50:423PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 02:59:21:283PM | Plasma | Bad | OH1 Self Powered fault due to disruption |
| 26 | 03:13:02:150PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 03:29:33:267PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 03:42:14:627PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 03:55:26:627PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 30 | 04:08:20:343PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 31 | 04:20:48:877PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 32 | 04:34:28:047PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 33 | 04:47:52:093PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 34 | 05:00:31:687PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| System Availability | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mar 13 2008 09:10:55:910AM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||