| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Brian Labombard |
| Physics operator(s): | Bill Rowan |
| Engineering operator(s): | Andy Pfeiffer,Bill Cochran,Bill Cochran,Bill Byford |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| MP#570 - Boundary layer heat transport experiments in L-mode plasmas SL |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Sep 22 2009 01:36:10:430PM |
| Author: Brian Labombard |
| Run Plan for 1090923
MP#570 - Boundary layer heat transport experiments in L-mode plasmas Goal Our first goal today is to complete the 2.7 tesla entries in Table 1 of the MP. With luck, we will complete this in the first half of the run. Then we will start on a series of ICRF power scan discharges at 0.8 MA and 5.4 tesla at various densities ('run number 5' in Table 1 of the MP). Setup Reload from shot#1090910024. This was a NL04 ~ 0.34e20, 0.4 MA shot with TF ramping down to 4 tesla from 5.4. This shot used Steve Wolfe's OH1 cross-over glitch controller. It also had a slow ramp in RXL to sweep the strike-point across the outer divertor. Import segment#1 from 1090710008 - low field startup. Set engineering parameters based on this shot. Program toroidal field to 2.7 tesla and plasma current to 0.4 MA in other segments. NINJA should be filled to 8 PSI D2. Tweak the RXL sweep so that probe#8 on the outer divertor goes into the private flux region. A. LSN, 2.7 tesla, 0.4 MA, Ohmic NL04~ 0.35, 0.45, 0.55, 0.65e20 Two shots at each density, probes scanning to resolve shear layer. If the low-field startup looks like a problem, we will reload from 1090910024 and program the field to ramp down to 2.7 tesla. The strike-point sweep will need to happen much later in time, affecting the ability to do GPI on every shot. B. LSN, 5.4 tesla, 0.8 MA, ICRF power scans Reload shot#5 from 1090825 Tweak RXL so that probe#8 on the outer divertor goes into private zone. NL04: ~ 0.4 RF: 0 MW - 2 shots (first with NINJA, second without) RF: 0.6 MW - 2 shots RF: 1.2 MW - 2 shots NL04: ~ 0.6 ... NL04: ~ 0.8 ... NL04: ~ 1.0 ... NL04 ~ 1.2 ... |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Entered: Sep 22 2009 02:53:10:920PM |
| Author: Bill Rowan |
| -----------------
Engineering Setup ----------------- Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 17:00 Power systems as on:1090710008 Acoil: +Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot (standard) Hybrid Enabled Gas setup: Fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar Hybrid DISABLED (PG1) leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) fill B-main (C-side) with 40 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3) fill NINJA with 8 psi D2 DISABLED Enable gatevalves and shutters: ECE, VUV, DNB, Z-bolo Torvac gatevalve toggle (yes/no): no Boronization(yes/no): no Overnight ECDC (yes/no): yes ICRF(yes/no): yes LH(yes/no): no DNB(yes/no): if available Cryopump (yes/no): no Vessel temperature: 35/35/35 ------------------------------ ECDC Parameters (if requested) ------------------------------ gas and pressure: He at 5e-5 Torr sweep: 44/45/103 cm scan: 20/120 s |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Sep 23 2009 10:20:01:053PM |
| Author: Brian Labombard |
| Run Summary for 1090923
MP#570 "Boundary layer heat transport experiments in L-mode plasmas" This was another successful run for the MP, completing the 2.7 tesla ohmic density scan and getting a good start on a set of 5.4 tesla, RF-heated L-mode plasmas. In order to set up the 0.4 MA, 2.7 tesla discharges, we employed a low-field start-up program developed recently by Ian. Initially, there was some concern that we would not be able to reproduce Ian's 'magic touch' at the controls and would just bang our heads against a string of fizzles/duds. Instead, the gamble paid off. Apart from shot#1 (an early disruption) every low-field startup attempt went on to produce a useful plasma - 15 shots in a row. So low-field start-up is definitely a new tool that we should not be afraid to use. It was particularly helpful today because we wanted to establish the 2.7 tesla flattop early (before 0.5s) so that we could make the most use of a strike-point sweep. Steve Wolfe's cross-over control algorithm was also employed, keeping the left gap open during this even with a manageable level of gap wobble. By shot #5 we had optimized the strike-point sweep up the divertor plate such that the 'nose' Langmuir probe (#8 ) recorded the full SOL profile -- common-flux region, strike-point and private-flux regions. This was important as it was noted in earlier runs that the pressure profile measured by 'vertical plate' probes is different from the 'nose' probe, likely involving the differences in field line angles striking the divertor plate. Heat fluxes were low in the 0.4 MA shots, so we relied heavily on the divertor sensors for these. On shot#17 we turned our attention back to standard 5.4 tesla, 0.8 MA shots with the idea of adding RF to change the footprint power loading. Now the IR camera started to record profiles. Although the strike-point sweep was great for Langmuir probes and heat-flux sensors (Dan reported some clean temperature rises on surface TCs #3 an #5), it was not so good for generating a simple IR camera picture of the footprint. As the strike-point runs up the plate it lights up various tile sensors in an irregular way, blending with some reflected plasma light near the nose tile. Also, because the sweep reduces the temperature excursion on the plate by spreading the heat flux, the IR signal tends to stay low. Despite these warts, we kept on with the strike-point sweeping program. However, we will want to go back to a fixed strike-point later to let the tiles heat up to generate a nice IR signature. As expected, the ICRF-heated shots were a challenge for the scanning probes today. Sheath-rectification effects were evident on the ASP and FSP as high Te values were recorded in the far SOL. Yet the WASP on the inner wall appeared to be immune to the RF, recording clean Te profiles and regularly poking past the LCFS. An additional wrinkle has the that FSP appeared to pipe RF noise into the F-Port rack system, causing the cPCI systems to do crazy things like putting power supplies into a standby mode halfway through the shot. For this reason, we left it off after shot#23 (no more entertainment on the video monitor). The ASP was pushed to its limits also, on the verge of overheating in the later shots. This required a number of embarrassingly small tweaks to the right gap, which Bill accommodated without complaint. H-modes were a problem today - we did not want them but got them without trying. They tended to occur late in the shot (> 1 s) at very low RF power, 0.5 MW, at the lowest densities (21,23,24,27). They would spoil the footprint because they would occur before the strike-point sweep was completed. I don't remember attaining H-modes under these conditions at such low power. Also, we had the strike-point on the 'nose' tile, a location where the power threshold was found to increase during recent runs. Anyway, these pesky H-modes restricted the amount of RF that we could inject so we only got a two-point power scan, 0 and 0.4 MW, for NL04 < 0.8. For NL04 ~ 0.82 we were on our way to get a three-point power scan (0, 0.4, 0.8MW). However, the ASP was inserted too far for the 0.8 MW case and the plasma disrupted shortly thereafter. Shot Log: 1- early disruption 2-LSN,4.0T,0.4MA,NL04~0.33, no probes scanning. 3-LSN,3.3T,0.4MA,NL04~0.33, ASP(0),FSP(-10),WASP(7V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.2s 4-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.35, ASP(+5),FSP(-7),WASP(7V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.2s 5-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.35, ASP(+5),FSP(-5),WASP(9,10,12V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.2s Probes need to be deeper Excellent x-pt sweep. LP#8 maps out full profile 6-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.36, ASP(+7),FSP(-3),WASP(11,13,15V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s ASP could be deeper, else pretty good. 7-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.36, ASP(+8.5),FSP(-3),WASP(11,13,15V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s Boron coating finally comes off ASP. Best data is last two scans. 8-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.45, ASP(+8.5),FSP(-1),WASP(11,13,15V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s F-port power supplies stayed in standby on this shot. No FSP or WASP data 9-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.47, ASP(+10.5),FSP(-1),WASP(11,13,15V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s F-port supplies back. FSP not deep enough. 10-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.47, ASP(+10.5),FSP(+1),WASP(11,13,17V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s Nice data. 11-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.57, ASP(+10.5),FSP(+1),WASP(11,13,17V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s FSP could be deeper 12-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.57, ASP(+10.5),FSP(+3),WASP(11,14,18V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s Nice data. 13-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.65, ASP(+10.5),FSP(+3),WASP(11,14,18V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s WASP could be deeper 14-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.64, ASP(+10.5),FSP(+3.5),WASP(13,16,20V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s 15-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.7, ASP(+12),FSP(+5),WASP(13,16,22V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s F-port DT191_01 - no data. 16-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.72, ASP(+12.5),FSP(+6),WASP(13,16,22V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s Change to 5.4 tesla, 0.8 MA 17-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.68 no probes scanning 18-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.52, ASP(+8),FSP(-12),WASP(14,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s WASP was not enabled. Target drifts away from ASP 19-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.45, ASP(+8),FSP(-12),WASP(14,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s FSP too deep on last scan ASP not reaching on last scan. 20-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.47, ASP(+8),FSP(-12),WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s WASP - excellent FSP, ASP could be deeper Add 0.6 MW RF next 21-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.47, ASP(+8),FSP(-12),WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.95, 1.3s 0.6 MW RF (D&E) No data from F-port Langmuir probes. Xantrex supplies go into standby mode during shot, CPCI gets gronked - likely RF pickup from FSP H-mode at 1.14 s 22 - early disruption 23-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.47, ASP(+8), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.95, 1.3s FSP not scanning. It may be causing RF pickup in F-port rack so leave it off for now. 0.5 MW RF (D & E) H-mode at 1.3s More power to divertor plate. 24-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.47, ASP(+9), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.95, 1.3s 0.5 MW RF (D & E) H-mode at 1.3s Excellent WASP and ASP data. ASP sees sheath-rectification effects - high Te in far SOL WASP is does not appear to be affected by RF. 25- no power shot 26-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.68, ASP(+9), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.95, 1.3s No RF. Excellent WASP and ASP data. 27-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.68, ASP(+9), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.95, 1.3s 0.5 MW RF ASP deep on first scan. H-mode at 1 second - spoils footprint mapping Next: reduce RF power to 0.4 MW 28-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.7, ASP(+8.5), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.95, 1.3s ASP a bit deep on first scan. 0.44 MW RF (D & E) no H-mode 29-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.82, ASP(+8.5), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.95, 1.3s No RF. again, ASP a bit deep on first scan. ASP SE electrode - no dt216 data 30-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.82, ASP(+8.0), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.95, 1.3s ASP a bit deep on first scan. 0.2 MW RF (E only) 31-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.82, ASP(+7.5), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.95, 1.3s Great targeting 0.4 MW (E only) 32-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA 0.8 MW (E only) Disrupts at 0.6 seconds. ASP too deep. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Sep 24 2009 09:35:54:027AM |
| Author: Bill Rowan |
| During this run, there was a density scan at low field (2.9T) and a density and small RF power scan at 5.4T. Later shots at 5.4 T generated H-modes at even the low RF power applied (0.4 MW).
Since low density discharges were requested for the first shots, ECDC was in helium. The requested densities were easily achieved at the lower TF that we started with. Later in the day and at higher TF, the lowest requested density was not obtained although the gas valve seemed to be turned off during the discharge. The recently-developed low field start up was used for the low field part of the run. (Reference 1090710008) The requested setup required an extensive strike-point scan at low TF, and the usual technique of starting at 5.4 T and then reducing the field would not have left sufficient time for the strike-point scan. The low field startup was modified by starting the TF at -1.0 s instead of -0.5 s. The intent was to avoid problems with coax resistance in the low field startup. This seemed to have helped. The strike-point scan was accomplished with simultaneous radial and vertical motion of the lower x-point. The most extreme scan was approximately 4 cm radially and two cm vertically. There were three disruptions during the day. The initial attempt to operate at 2.7 T resulted in a disruption (001). Without much reflection, the field was increased to 2.9 T (also acceptable to the SL), and shot 002 did not disrupt. shot 022 disrupted after lowering the density. The density was increased on the following shot and the disruption did not repeat. Shot 032 disrupted and was possibly due to a probe interaction. Score card 31 plasmas, 3 disruptions (001,022,02) 01 no power shot -- computer problem 0 fizzles 0 duds 32 total |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Sep 23 2009 10:09:40:917AM | 1090923002 | Brian Labombard | 2-LSN,4.0T,0.4MA,NL04~0.33, no probes scanning. |
| Sep 23 2009 10:09:54:633AM | 1090923003 | Brian Labombard | 3-LSN,3.3T,0.4MA,NL04~0.33, ASP(0),FSP(-10),WASP(7V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.2s |
| Sep 23 2009 10:11:27:807AM | 1090923004 | Brian Labombard | 4-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.35, ASP(+5),FSP(-7),WASP(7V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.2s increased x-pt sweep by 1 cm in RXL |
| Sep 23 2009 10:26:25:230AM | 1090923005 | Brian Labombard | 5-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.35, ASP(+5),FSP(-5),WASP(9,10,12V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.2s Probes need to be deeper Excellent x-pt sweep. LP#8 maps out full profile |
| Sep 23 2009 10:40:57:073AM | 1090923006 | Brian Labombard | 6-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.36, ASP(+7),FSP(-3),WASP(11,13,15V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s ASP could be deeper, else pretty good. |
| Sep 23 2009 11:12:17:947AM | 1090923007 | Brian Labombard | 7-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.36, ASP(+8.5),FSP(-3),WASP(11,13,15V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s Boron coating finally comes off ASP. Best data is last two scans. |
| Sep 23 2009 11:12:34:260AM | 1090923008 | Brian Labombard | 8-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.45, ASP(+8.5),FSP(-1),WASP(11,13,15V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s F-port power supplies stayed in standby on this shot. No FSP or WASP data |
| Sep 23 2009 11:30:39:963AM | 1090923009 | Brian Labombard | 9-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.47, ASP(+10.5),FSP(-1),WASP(11,13,15V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s F-port supplies back. FSP not deep enough. |
| Sep 23 2009 11:42:17:823AM | 1090923010 | Brian Labombard | 10-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.47, ASP(+10.5),FSP(+1),WASP(11,13,17V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s Nice data |
| Sep 23 2009 12:08:20:320PM | 1090923011 | Brian Labombard | 11-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.57, ASP(+10.5),FSP(+1),WASP(11,13,17V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s FSP could be deeper |
| Sep 23 2009 12:08:40:883PM | 1090923012 | Brian Labombard | 12-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.57, ASP(+10.5),FSP(+3),WASP(11,14,18V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s Nice data. |
| Sep 23 2009 01:14:12:337PM | 1090923013 | Brian Labombard | 13-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.65, ASP(+10.5),FSP(+3),WASP(11,14,18V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s WASP could be deeper |
| Sep 23 2009 01:14:27:243PM | 1090923014 | Brian Labombard | 14-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.64, ASP(+10.5),FSP(+3.5),WASP(13,16,20V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s |
| Sep 23 2009 01:14:48:493PM | 1090923015 | Brian Labombard | 15-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.7, ASP(+12),FSP(+5),WASP(13,16,22V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s F-port DT191_01 - no data |
| Sep 23 2009 01:49:01:603PM | 1090923016 | Brian Labombard | 16-LSN,2.8T,0.4MA,NL04~0.72, ASP(+12.5),FSP(+6),WASP(13,16,22V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s Change to 5.4 tesla, 0.8 MA |
| Sep 23 2009 01:49:14:947PM | 1090923017 | Brian Labombard | 17-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.68 no probes scanning |
| Sep 23 2009 04:02:30:103PM | 1090923018 | Brian Labombard | 18-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.52, ASP(+8),FSP(-12),WASP(14,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s WASP was not enabled Target drifts away from ASP |
| Sep 23 2009 04:02:46:273PM | 1090923019 | Brian Labombard | 19-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.45, ASP(+8),FSP(-12),WASP(14,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s FSP too deep on last scan ASP not reaching on last scan |
| Sep 23 2009 04:02:57:167PM | 1090923020 | Brian Labombard | 20-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.47, ASP(+8),FSP(-12),WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s WASP - excellent FSP, ASP could be deeper Add 0.6 MW RF next |
| Sep 23 2009 04:09:18:900PM | 1090923021 | Brian Labombard | 21-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.47, ASP(+8),FSP(-12),WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s 0.6 MW RF (D&E) No data from F-port Langmuir probes. Xantrex supplies go into standby mode during shot, CPCI gets gronked - likely RF pickup from FSP H-mode at 1.14 s |
| Sep 23 2009 04:09:30:870PM | 1090923023 | Brian Labombard | 23-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.47, ASP(+8), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s FSP not scanning. It may be causing RF pickup in F-port rack so leave it off for now. 0.5 MW RF (D & E) H-mode at 1.3s More power to divertor plate |
| Sep 23 2009 04:09:42:133PM | 1090923024 | Brian Labombard | 24-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.47, ASP(+9), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.9, 1.3s 0.5 MW RF (D & E) H-mode at 1.3s Excellent WASP and ASP data. ASP sees sheath-rectification effects - high Te in far SOL WASP is does not appear to be affected by RF. |
| Sep 23 2009 04:10:09:337PM | 1090923026 | Brian Labombard | 26-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.68, ASP(+9), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.99, 1.3s Excellent WASP and ASP data. |
| Sep 23 2009 04:10:51:133PM | 1090923027 | Brian Labombard | 27-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.68, ASP(+9), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.99, 1.3s ASP deep on first scan. H-mode at 1 second - spoils footprint mapping Next: reduce RF power to 0.4 MW |
| Sep 23 2009 04:21:54:277PM | 1090923028 | Brian Labombard | 28-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.7, ASP(+8.5), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.99, 1.3s ASP a bit deep on first scan. 0.44 MW RF (D & E) no H-mode |
| Sep 23 2009 04:37:41:790PM | 1090923029 | Brian Labombard | 29-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.82, ASP(+8.5), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.95, 1.3s No RF. Again, ASP a bit deep on first scan. |
| Sep 23 2009 04:54:22:120PM | 1090923030 | Brian Labombard | 30-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.82, ASP(+8.5), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.95, 1.3s ASP deep on first scan. 0.2 MW RF (E only) |
| Sep 23 2009 05:21:16:233PM | 1090923031 | Brian Labombard | 31-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA,NL04~0.82, ASP(+7.5), WASP(13.5,16,18V) @ 0.6, 0.95, 1.3s Great targeting 0.4 MW (E only) |
| Sep 23 2009 05:21:28:263PM | 1090923032 | Brian Labombard | 32-LSN,5.5T,0.8MA 0.8 MW (E only) Disrupts at 0.6 seconds. ASP too deep |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Sep 23 2009 08:27:10:430AM | Bill Rowan | verified that ECDC was in helium as requested
loaded 1090910024 as requested by SL imported segment 1090710008 to pick up the low field startup increased prefill (PG4 in seg 1) from 17 ms to 24 ms to match prefill on 1090922003 Reset plateau TF to 2.7 T (74250A) to match SL request The low field startup segment 1 ends at 96000 so set the starting point of segment 2 to 96000 Verified IP set to 0.4 MA | |
| Sep 23 2009 08:51:14:777AM | Bill Rowan | Change TF start to -1.0s from -0.5. Programmed a flat top from -1.0 to 0.0
Change the engineering timing as well | |
| Sep 23 2009 09:13:33:463AM | 1090923001 | Bill Rowan | 001. Startup worked. Disruption at 0.35 s
Next shot. Increase BT to 3.7 T which was the original setting for this segment. |
| Sep 23 2009 09:28:11:790AM | 1090923002 | Bill Rowan | 002. Plasma ran full length
Next shot. BT = 3.2T (90000A) |
| Sep 23 2009 09:32:03:947AM | 1090923002 | Bill Rowan | Changed the x-point sweep. added 1 cm to rxl at end of sweep
|
| Sep 23 2009 09:47:43:137AM | 1090923003 | Bill Rowan | 003. Plasma ran full length
Bt = 3.3 T Next shot. BT = 2.7 t (75000) |
| Sep 23 2009 09:49:59:743AM | 1090923003 | Bill Rowan | Changed the x-point sweep. added 1 cm to rxl at end of sweep |
| Sep 23 2009 09:50:39:430AM | 1090923003 | Bill Rowan |
plc/hardware fizzle detector to 2.1 s OH supply inversion times to 2.3 s |
| Sep 23 2009 10:04:45:523AM | 1090923004 | Bill Rowan | 004. Plasma ran full length
Bt = 2.9 T Next shot No PCS changes |
| Sep 23 2009 10:14:22:540AM | 1090923005 | Bill Rowan | 005. Plasma
Runaways evident Next shot Add 2 ms to prefill: 26 ms |
| Sep 23 2009 10:27:04:760AM | 1090923006 | Bill Rowan | 006. Plasma
|
| Sep 23 2009 10:38:37:730AM | 1090923006 | Bill Rowan | Next shot. No pcs changes |
| Sep 23 2009 10:46:19:447AM | 1090923007 | Bill Rowan | 007. Plasma
Next shot. increase nl_04 from 0.35e+20 to 0.45e+20 |
| Sep 23 2009 11:00:00:773AM | 1090923008 | Bill Rowan | 008. Plasma
nl_04 averages 0.45 |
| Sep 23 2009 11:12:47:590AM | 1090923008 | Bill Rowan | Next shot.
No pcs changes |
| Sep 23 2009 11:27:56:930AM | 1090923009 | Bill Rowan | 009. Plasma
Next shot. No pcs changes |
| Sep 23 2009 11:34:59:947AM | 1090923010 | Bill Rowan | 010. Plasma
Next shot increase nl_04 from 0.45 to 0.55 |
| Sep 23 2009 11:56:58:073AM | 1090923011 | Bill Rowan | 011. Plasma
nl_04 averages 0.55 Next shot No PCS changes |
| Sep 23 2009 12:00:44:917PM | 1090923012 | Bill Rowan | 012. Plasma
Next shot. increase nl_04 from 0.55 to 0.65 |
| Sep 23 2009 12:14:36:260PM | 1090923013 | Bill Rowan | 013. Plasma
Next shot. No PCS changes |
| Sep 23 2009 12:31:54:027PM | 1090923014 | Bill Rowan | 014. Plasma
|
| Sep 23 2009 12:36:48:023PM | 1090923014 | Bill Rowan | 014. Plasma
Next shot increase nl_04 from 0.65 to 0.70 |
| Sep 23 2009 12:47:16:947PM | 1090923015 | Bill Rowan | 015. Plasma
|
| Sep 23 2009 12:49:17:807PM | 1090923015 | Bill Rowan | Next shot.
No PCS changes |
| Sep 23 2009 01:10:55:637PM | 1090923016 | Bill Rowan | 016. Plasma
|
| Sep 23 2009 01:25:06:400PM | 1090923016 | Bill Rowan | next shot
load 1090825005 into pcs this is also the new engineering shot load segment 1 from 1090922003 changed rxl to match that on shot 015 to produce the x-point scan required by SL |
| Sep 23 2009 01:35:37:057PM | 1090923017 | Bill Rowan | 017. Plasma
ip = 0.8 MA nl_04 = 0.65e+20 Bt = 5.5 T |
| Sep 23 2009 01:42:52:777PM | 1090923017 | Bill Rowan | Next shot.
No PCS changes |
| Sep 23 2009 02:06:14:243PM | 1090923018 | Bill Rowan | Next shot.
decrease outer gap in a ramp from 0.5 to 1.5 s |
| Sep 23 2009 02:09:45:510PM | 1090923019 | Bill Rowan | 019. Plasma
Next shot. decrease outer gap again increase zxl by 5 mm in a ramp from 0.5 to 1.5 |
| Sep 23 2009 02:23:20:167PM | 1090923020 | Bill Rowan | 020. Plasma
next shot. increase zxl by an additional 5 mm in a ramp from 0.5 to 1.5 decrease outer gap again |
| Sep 23 2009 02:35:10:603PM | 1090923021 | Bill Rowan | 021. Plasma. dithering h-mode
Next shot decrease nl_04 demand from 0.4e+20 to 0.35e+20 |
| Sep 23 2009 02:36:28:057PM | 1090923021 | Bill Rowan | increase outer gap slightly
|
| Sep 23 2009 03:24:46:930PM | 1090923023 | Bill Rowan | 023. Plasma |
| Sep 23 2009 03:24:12:917PM | 1090923024 | Bill Rowan | 024. Plasma
Next shot Increase nl_04 to 0.65e+20 |
| Sep 23 2009 03:37:19:340PM | 1090923025 | Bill Rowan | 025. No power shot |
| Sep 23 2009 03:49:11:070PM | 1090923026 | Bill Rowan | 026. Plasma
Next shot. No PCS changes |
| Sep 23 2009 04:07:06:900PM | 1090923027 | Bill Rowan | 027. Plasma. H-mode at 1 s
Next shot No PCS changes |
| Sep 23 2009 04:20:47:120PM | 1090923028 | Bill Rowan | 028. Plasma. No h-mode
Next shot Increase nl_04 demand by 0.2e+20 |
| Sep 23 2009 04:32:02:027PM | 1090923029 | Bill Rowan | 029. Plasma
nl_04 = 0.83e+20 next shot. Slight reduction in outer gap |
| Sep 23 2009 04:49:48:527PM | 1090923030 | Bill Rowan | 030. Plasma
Next shot. Slight reduction in outer gap |
| Sep 23 2009 05:00:27:197PM | 1090923031 | Bill Rowan | 031. Plasma
Next shot No pcs changes |
| Sep 23 2009 05:16:14:660PM | 1090923032 | Bill Rowan | 032. Plasma. disruption at 0.6 s
might be a probe Last shot. |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 08:57:23:977AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 2 | 09:16:59:807AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 09:34:27:853AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 09:52:07:417AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 10:05:32:010AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 10:24:47:573AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 10:38:42:680AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 10:52:51:917AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 11:15:53:400AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 11:28:47:353AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 11:41:31:730AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 11:55:21:447AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 12:09:43:773PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 12:22:24:557PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 12:41:51:417PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 01:08:41:370PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 01:28:24:353PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 01:45:09:387PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 02:00:33:120PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 02:13:20:150PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 02:27:48:917PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 02:45:15:523PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 02:59:08:743PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 03:12:33:277PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 03:33:18:260PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 03:45:13:213PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 03:58:08:447PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 04:12:12:213PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 04:25:35:197PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 30 | 04:41:39:727PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 31 | 04:56:22:103PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 32 | 05:13:35:560PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| System Availability | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sep 23 2009 08:56:59:070AM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||