| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Dennis Whyte |
| Physics operator(s): | Jim Irby |
| Engineering operator(s): | Bill Parkin,Ed Fitzgerald |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| Characterization and Optimization of I-mode EO Parkin, PO Irby, SL Whyt |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Oct 8 2009 02:22:00:070PM |
| Author: Dennis Whyte |
| Characterization and Optimization of I-mode
---------------------------------- Day 2 The purpose of these experiments is to characterize the necessary parameters to obtain I-mode (a.k.a. enhanced L-mode) while documenting I-mode plasma characteristics and optimizing I-mode towards its application in Alcator C-Mod for high confinement at low density. The experiment will focus on expanding the available I-mode operating space by exploring the effects of shaping, density, q95, and Ip with a goal of obtaining basic scaling relationships for further use on C-Mod and possible exploration on other devices. USN, #1090915020 reference shot (shape) Cryopump ON Toroidal Field: 5.0 - 5.8 T (clockwise) Plasma Current: 0.8 - 1.4 MA Working Gas Species: D2 Density: Target NL04 densities from 0.3 to 1 (1e20) Boronization Requested: NO ICRF Power: > 5 MW, Each shot will have 4 steps in RF of 200 ms each. Diagnostics: ECE with varying B field Edge TS with alignment for pedestal/edge as reference shot Note: DNB is offline so no pedestal diagnosis available from CXRS Run Plan -------- Our first run day had some delays so we only got to #3c in our run plan. The analysis to date suggested that q95 was the most important parameter in H-mode avoidance which may affect our choices in the scans. Changes to shot strategy from Day 1 1. RF power will ramp up to the first step rather than turn on to full power immediately. 2. We should examine the early density control which seemed to swing the density around, presumably due to the presence of the cryopump. Here's the rest of our run ( I use the same numbering as in the MP) 3 c) Ip = 1.15 MA, q95 ~ 3.36, 250 ms Prf steps: 3.4, 3.6, 3.8, 4.0 d) Ip = 1.25 MA, q95 ~ 3.1, 250 ms Prf steps: 3.9, 4.1, 4.3, 4.5 e) Ip = 1.35 MA, q95 ~ 2.9, 250 ms Prf steps: 4.3, 4.6, 4.9, 5.2 4. Density scan at high Ip / low q95 (3e forms part of scan) N.B. ordering of density scan is reversed from MP Reference shape: #1080416015, Ip = 1.35 MA, Bt = 5.63 T 6 shots a) NL04 = 0.5e20, Prf steps: 4.3, 4.6, 4.9, 5.2 (or lowest density achievable) b) NL04 = 0.6e20, Prf steps: 4.3, 4.6, 4.9, 5.2 c) NL04 = 0.7e20, Prf steps: 4.3, 4.6, 4.9, 5.2 d) NL04 = 0.9e20, Prf steps: 4.3, 4.6, 4.9, 5.2 e) NL04 = 1.1e20, Prf steps: 4.3, 4.6, 4.9, 5.2 f) NL04 = 1.3e20, Prf steps: 4.3, 4.6, 4.9, 5.2 5. Density scan at low Ip / high q95 (3b forms part of scan) Reference shape: #1080416015, Ip = 1.0 MA, Bt = 5.63 T 6 shots a) NL04 = 0.3e20, Prf steps: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 (or lowest density achievable) b) NL04 = 0.4e20, Prf steps: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 c) NL04 = 0.5e20, Prf steps: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 d) NL04 = 0.6e20, Prf steps: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 e) NL04 = 0.7e20, Prf steps: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 f) NL04 = 1e20, Prf steps: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 When we get through this we move the "shaping study" 6. Increase κ to ~1.7, same triangularity ~ 0.6 as Day 1 (Circle 2 Fig. 3) 3 shots a) Ip = 1 MA, Bt = 5.63 T, q95 ~ 3.9, NL04 = 0.8e20, Prf steps: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 b) Ip = 1 MA, Bt = 5.63 T, q95 ~ 3.9, NL04 = 0.5e20 (or lowest possible) , Prf steps: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 c) Ip = 1.35 MA, Bt = 5.63 T, q95 ~ 2.9, NL04 = 0.8e20, Prf steps: 4.3, 4.6, 4.9, 5.2 7. Increase κ to ~1.8 (or max.), same triangularity ~ 0.6 as Day 1 (Circle 3 Fig. 3) 3 shots a) Ip = 1 MA, Bt = 5.63 T, q95 ~ 3.9, NL04 = 0.8e20, Prf steps: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 b) Ip = 1 MA, Bt = 5.63 T, q95 ~ 3.9, NL04 = 0.5e20 (or lowest possible) , Prf steps: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 c) Ip = 1.35 MA, Bt = 5.63 T, q95 ~ 2.9, NL04 = 0.8e20, Prf steps: 4.3, 4.6, 4.9, 5.2 8. Keep κ at ~1.8 (or max.), increase triangularity to 0.8 (Circle 4 Fig. 3) 3 shots a) Ip = 1 MA, Bt = 5.63 T, q95 ~ 3.9, NL04 = 0.8e20, Prf steps: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 b) Ip = 1 MA, Bt = 5.63 T, q95 ~ 3.9, NL04 = 0.5e20 (or lowest possible) , Prf steps: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 c) Ip = 1.35 MA, Bt = 5.63 T, q95 ~ 2.9, NL04 = 0.8e20, Prf steps: 4.3, 4.6, 4.9, 5.2 9. Reduce κ to ~1.7 (or max.), keep triangularity at 0.8 (Circle 5 Fig. 3) 3 shots a) Ip = 1 MA, Bt = 5.63 T, q95 ~ 3.9, NL04 = 0.8e20, Prf steps: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 b) Ip = 1 MA, Bt = 5.63 T, q95 ~ 3.9, NL04 = 0.5e20 (or lowest possible) , Prf steps: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 c) Ip = 1.35 MA, Bt = 5.63 T, q95 ~ 2.9, NL04 = 0.8e20, Prf steps: 4.3, 4.6, 4.9, 5.2 10. Steady demonstration shot Type #1: â??ITER q=3â?? 4 shots Bt=5.4 T, q95~3, shape: TBD Variables (influenced on parameter scan results of 2-4. - target density: NL04 ~ 0.5-0.7 to reduce pedestal collisionality to ITER target 0.08 - RF: constant through shot, ~ 4.5 - 5 MW 11. Steady demonstration shot Type #2: Low collisionality AT / LH target 4 shots Bt= TBD, q95~4, shape: TBD Variables (influenced on parameter scan results of 2-4. - target density: minimum possible NL04 ~ 0.5-0.7 - RF: constant through shot, ~ 3.5 - 4 MW |
| Entered: Oct 9 2009 03:30:29:533PM |
| Author: Dennis Whyte |
| 1 MA 5.6 T case
Trying to better regulate the early density form so that we won't get runaways and locked modes at higher current Density had too big a dip at 0.4 seconds when the plasma diverted and started pumping. Will tweak the gas forms again. |
| Entered: Oct 9 2009 04:00:35:280PM |
| Author: Dennis Whyte |
| 1 MA 5.6 T case
Got better density control on this. Very constant NL04~0.8 in flattop 3.4 MW RF without any H-mode. Sure looks like I-mode. Good confinement (lost edge TS) |
| Entered: Oct 9 2009 04:22:10:547PM |
| Author: Dennis Whyte |
| 1.25 MA 5.6 T case
Early H-mode at 3.5 MA Next shot: turn off LBO and Ninja to make sure these aren't affecting anything. and reduce early RF. |
| Entered: Oct 9 2009 05:03:30:687PM |
| Author: Dennis Whyte |
| 1.35 MA 5.6 T case
Step 3e H-mode at 3.6 MW. Note much lower than 1080416028 PLH ~ 4.4 MW but that was at slightly higher density Wth 170 kJ |
| Entered: Oct 9 2009 05:04:25:720PM |
| Author: Dennis Whyte |
| 1.25 MA 5.6 T case
Step 3d D ant dropped out so less power, but definitely I-mode |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Entered: Oct 8 2009 03:09:27:023PM |
| Author: Jim Irby |
| We will continue MP579 Characterization and optimization of I-mode
SL: Whyte PO: Irby ----------------- Engineering Setup ----------------- Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 17:00 Power systems as on: 1090915020 Acoil: +Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot (standard) Hybrid Enabled Gas setup: Fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar Hybrid DISABLED (PG1) leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) fill B-main (C-side) with 40 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3) fill NINJA with 10 psi D2 DISABLED Enable gatevalves and shutters: ECE, VUV, Z-bolo Torvac gatevalve toggle (yes/no): no Boronization(yes/no): no Overnight ECDC (yes/no): if available ICRF(yes/no): yes LH(yes/no): no DNB(yes/no): no Cryopump (yes/no): yes Vessel temperature: 35/35/35 ------------------------------ ECDC Parameters (if available) ------------------------------ gas and pressure: D2 at 2e-4 Torr sweep: 44/45/103 cm scan: 20/120 s |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Oct 9 2009 05:41:06:267PM |
| Author: Dennis Whyte |
| We did not advance the run plan very far today
due to the alternator and EF3 issues, however we did accomplish getting through the current/q95 scan at nearly fixed density. I-modes were achieved up to 1.35 MA, q95~3 although the H-mode threshold was lower than 2008 shots at higher density. We were about to start the density scan but ran out of time. shot run plan # Ip 9 3 b 1 10 3 c 1.15 11 3 d 1.25 12 3 d 1.25 13 3 e 1.35 |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Oct 13 2009 02:05:48:410PM |
| Author: Jim Irby |
| This run had several engineering issues that greatly reduced the number of useful discharges for the I-Mode mini-proposal. We were unable to bring the alternator up to speed by run time because of fault indications in the motor drive control electronics. After several hours of debugging, the alternator made full speed 13:00. However, on the first plasma attempt, the EF3 supply did not perform properly. So time was then required to debug the supply, and perform an EF3 PLC controlled test shot We finally had another plasma attempt around 14:44 which turned out to be a Physics Operator induced fizzle (incorrect setting of EF4 pre-charge current). The rest of the day (from a PO perspective) involved adjustments of prefill, pg3 puffing, and nl04 feedback to eliminate MARFEs, fill in the density drop around 400 ms, and reduce runaways. We also had a couple of cryopump burps resulting in fizzles. At least one disruption, probably as a result of a locked mode, resulted in a post-disruption fizzle. From shot 1 it was clear that the ratiomatic had failed. This problem did not help work on the startup.
Score: fizzles 01,03,04,06,08,15,16 plasmas 05,07,09,10,11,12,13,14 tests 02 fizzle suspects: 01 ef3 03, 04 incorrect ef4 setting 06 cryopump 08 disruption recovery 15,16 cryopump and/or disruption recovery |
| Session Leader Comments |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Oct 9 2009 02:07:56:370PM | 1091009001 | Jim Irby | We did have ECDC last night
load from 1090915020 --- USN, 1 MA, 5.62 T, 0.8e20/m^2 in seg 2 recalculated magnetics predictors in all segments loaded open tree done pg4 was 60 ms TF current 156400 A in seg 2 TF current set to 156400 A in seg 1 nl04 programming adjusted to get more density early (fill in dip) loaded open tree done little burst of N2 as cryopump was cooled down ef4 from -1300 to -1260 A loaded done 08:48 ---- alternator delay --- still no transfer to speed 3 09:20 752 RPM and still falling ***** 09:35 overcurrent indication in the alternator drive system. Alternator is being brought down to at least speed 1, to check it out estimated delay: 1.5 to 2.5 hours ***** ***** 10:47 still debugging --- another hour of debug at least, followed by 2.5 hours for spin up ***** ***** 11:00 spin up should begin by 11:30, we will start operation at 15:00 assuming transfer to speed 3 goes well ***** ***** 11:40 450 RPM --- full speed in 1:50 ***** ***** 12:38 Alt looks good --- resume operation at 13:15 ***** 13:00 Alternator is ready results -------------------------------- BP 1.5e-8 Torr EF3 starts very late at 1.1 s?? Ignores fizzle?? Ratiomatic electronics fault ---- controller will have to be removed and checked out on Tuesday |
| Oct 9 2009 02:26:43:997PM | 1091009002 | Jim Irby | Engineers in cell checking out EF3
EF3 circuit breaker had a flag Several EF3 circuit boards reseated (AFOLs for example) Nothing else found Setting up for EF3 PLC test pulse: 3 kA changes -------------------------------- no DPCS changes results -------------------------------- looks good --- right current, right time |
| Oct 9 2009 02:36:22:450PM | 1091009003 | Jim Irby | changes --------------------------------
no DPCS changes try for plasma results -------------------------------- fizzle --- from MKS gauges, pressure looks high compared to yesterday shot 31 |
| Oct 9 2009 02:44:52:013PM | 1091009004 | Jim Irby | changes --------------------------------
prefill from 60 to 50 ms loaded results -------------------------------- fizzle --- no current rise change I made to EF4 was probably incorrect will reset to yesterday's value (1300 A). |
| Oct 9 2009 02:59:20:527PM | 1091009005 | Jim Irby | changes --------------------------------
EF4 from -1260 to -1300 A loaded results -------------------------------- plasma for 1.48 s 3 MW rf MARFE from 100 to 350 ms --- too much gas |
| Oct 9 2009 03:08:38:980PM | 1091009006 | Jim Irby | changes --------------------------------
pg3 gas reduce by 20 ms nl04 risetime dropped a little loaded results -------------------------------- fizzle --- cryopump burp |
| Oct 9 2009 03:28:49:990PM | 1091009007 | Jim Irby | changes --------------------------------
try again w/o burp --- no dpcs changes results -------------------------------- BP 1.1e-7 Torr in CHECK plasma for 0.5404 s -- something fell in |
| Oct 9 2009 03:34:24:637PM | 1091009008 | Jim Irby | changes --------------------------------
nl04 programming increased to 1e20 before 0.35 s loaded results -------------------------------- fizzle |
| Oct 9 2009 03:48:07:640PM | 1091009009 | Jim Irby | changes --------------------------------
no changes results -------------------------------- plasma into rampdown nl04 dip much better still have injection at 0.414 s |
| Oct 9 2009 04:03:49:687PM | 1091009010 | Jim Irby | changes --------------------------------
Ip request to 1.15 MA from 1.00 MA nl04 peak request from 1 to 1.1e20 at 0.34 s loaded results -------------------------------- plasma into rampdown --- hards/MARFE |
| Oct 9 2009 04:16:46:093PM | 1091009011 | Jim Irby | changes --------------------------------
prefill increased by 5 ms Ip from 1.15 to 1.25 MA loaded results -------------------------------- plasma into rampdown |
| Oct 9 2009 04:29:14:720PM | 1091009012 | Jim Irby | changes --------------------------------
nl04 request dropped back to 1.0e20 early loaded results -------------------------------- plasma into rampdown --- no h-modes |
| Oct 9 2009 04:47:44:733PM | 1091009013 | Jim Irby | changes --------------------------------
Ip request from 1.25 to 1.35 MA loaded EF3 PLC limit from 12 to 14 kA results -------------------------------- plasma into rampdown |
| Oct 9 2009 05:13:38:390PM | 1091009014 | Jim Irby | changes --------------------------------
nl04 request from 0.8e20/m^2 to 0.6e20/m^2 early nl04 request from 1 to .8 e20/m^2 loaded results -------------------------------- plasma, but I dropped the early density too much --- locked mode at 0.4 took us out. |
| Oct 9 2009 05:19:14:453PM | 1091009015 | Jim Irby | changes --------------------------------
raised early nl04 request results -------------------------------- fizzle --- cryopump gurgle and burp |
| Oct 9 2009 05:25:28:233PM | 1091009016 | Jim Irby | changes --------------------------------
try again --- no changes results -------------------------------- fizzle --- a little bit more current, but... done |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 01:02:21:387PM | Plasma | Bad | EF3 fault, Fired at +1.2 sec |
| 2 | 02:15:30:823PM | Test | Ok | EF3 PLC 3KV, 3KA |
| 3 | 02:26:00:573PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 02:38:55:340PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 02:51:30:980PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 03:04:20:713PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 03:17:11:137PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 03:30:10:767PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 03:42:46:950PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 03:56:11:047PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 04:08:50:640PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 04:24:32:530PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 04:40:02:233PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 04:54:45:170PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 05:10:08:500PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 05:22:50:797PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| System Availability | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oct 9 2009 01:01:54:543PM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||