| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Greg Wallace,Syunichi Shiraiwa |
| Physics operator(s): | Robert Granetz |
| Engineering operator(s): | Andy Pfeiffer,Bill Parkin,Bill Byford |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| MP553 MP612 Session leaders: S. Shiraiwa and G. Wallace Physics operator |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Nov 30 2010 05:27:40:780PM |
| Author: Syunichi Shiraiwa |
| SL plan for 1101201 (AM) : AM and PM may be swapped
MP553 - Creation of revearsed sheer current profile using LH on low Ip plasmas Required systems: LH, ICRF, DNB, MSE, HXR, cryopump This run is to reproduce the transport barrier which we obtained 11/19 during LHCD and to try several ideas to find a nob to optimize the discharge. Reference shot : 1101119006 Shot plan 1) Shot 1 - 5 : Repeat the reference discharge with different DNB timing for MSE. If the ITB is successfully obtained, we try Ar on and Ar off discharges to see the effect of puff on the core impurity accumulation. Also, we may put ICRF after LHCD pulse in some discharge. 2) Shot 6-9 : try 100 deg. phasing of LHCD. 4 shot is to optimize the coupling and the increase the LHCD power. 3) Shot 10-15 : Launch ICRF power from J-port antenna. Assuming that transition happens somewhat reproducible timing, we try to start ICRF during or slightly before the transition. 4) If the run goes smoothly, we try slightly different density to move the cut-off layer of 88 GHz reflectometer (cut-off density is about 9e19, which is slightly higher than the reference discharge) ------Request for LH operation------ LH Launcher position with repect to the limiters: 0.1 mm LH Start time: 0.9 sec LH Stop time: 1.4 sec Phasing: 90 deg Net Power desired: 1MW LH Run Duration: Full day Waveform description: Standard |
| Entered: Nov 30 2010 06:52:36:347PM |
| Author: Greg Wallace |
| SL plan for 1101201 (AM)
MP612: Expanded exploration of LHCD Density Limit Required systems: LH, DNB, MSE, HXR, cryopump. LH setup: 90 deg phasing, 80-160 kW/klystron, launcher 0.1 mm behind limiter, pulse length 0.8-1.3 s. Reference shot: 1100820007 1) Establish double null with large inner gap at ~600 kW LH, nl_04=4.5e19. (1-2 shots) 2) Scan inner gap during LH from nominal value (~1.25 cm) to zero at nl_04=4.5e19. Scan of inner gap will be dynamic during LH pulse. Outer gap should be ~constant during inner gap scan. (2-3 shots) 3) Increase density to nl_04=7e19 without transition to H-mode. Adjust outer gap as necessary to prevent ionization at LH grill. (2-4 shots) 4) Repeat of step 2 at higher density. Scan inner gap during LH from nominal value (~1.25 cm) to zero at nl_04=7e19. Scan of inner gap will be dynamic during LH pulse. Outer gap should be ~constant during inner gap scan. (2-3 shots) 5) Maintain steady inner gap of 0.3 cm. Ramp density from 4.5-8e19 during LH. (2-3 shots) 6) If time allows, increase LH power to maximum available (~1 MW) to see how much current can be driven at high density in double null with small inner gap. |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Entered: Nov 30 2010 04:20:53:980PM |
| Author: Robert Granetz |
Engineering setup for Wednesday 2010/12/01
MP553 - Creation of revearsed sheer current profile using LH on low Ip plasmas
MP612 - Expanded exploration of LHCD Density Limit
Session leaders: S. Shiraiwa and G. Wallace
Physics operator: R. Granetz
Overnight: standard ECDC and 60 C bake.
Run will start at 09:00 and end at 17:00.
Power systems as on: 1101119006 (0.45 MA, 5.4 T, 0.35e20 m-2 target, USN,
cryopump)
A-coil configuration: +Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot; Hybrid enabled (standard
configuration)
Gas Setup:
fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4)
fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar Hybrid DISABLED (PG1)
leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2)
fill B-main (C-side) with 40 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3)
fill NINJA with 10 psi D2
Enable the following gate valves and shutters, assuming no vacuum problems:
ECE, VUV, Z-bolo, HIREX-Sr, B-spectrometer GV
Torvac setup: keep gate valves open during pulse
Specific diagnostics: DNB, MSE, HXR array, LH probes
Desired diagnostics: reflectometry, divertor heat flux, scanning probes
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Boronization: no
Impurity injector: no
ICRF: yes, only J-port (half of day only)
LH: yes
DNB: yes
Cryopump: yes
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Run plan: For MP553, start with 1101119006 (0.45 MA, 5.4 T, 0.35e20 m-2,
USN, cryopump). No argon puffing to begin with. Will use J-port
ICRF, but not on the first shot.
For MP612, start with 1100820007 (near DN, 0.8 MA, 5.4 T,
0.45e20 m-2). Scan inner gap dynamically to zero, keeping outer
gap constant (delta_RCUR = -0.5 * delta_CLEARIN) at a couple of
densities. Scan density at a constant inner gap.
|
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Dec 1 2010 07:45:05:987PM |
| Author: Syunichi Shiraiwa |
| Shot 22 - 34
Successful half day run in term of machine operation without fizzle, dud, and other technical problems. The attempt to reproduce the ITB discharges turns out to be difficult and complicated... We had one discharge (shot 22), which shows Te0 exceeding 4keV. There were several shots (shot 23, 25, 26, 34) which shows a break-in-slope in core soft X ray signal, and the increase of Te0 by about 0.5 keV (from 3keV to 3.5keV) Also, ITB foot points seems to be narrower in these discharge. There is one shot (shot 32) which shows a long delay of the sawtooth restart. Shot 21 and 27 had a strong instability probably due to mode locking. |
| Entered: Dec 1 2010 07:49:21:783PM |
| Author: Syunichi Shiraiwa |
| Shot 22 - 34
Asuccessful half day run in term of machine operation without fizzle, dud, and other technical problems. The attempt to reproduce the ITB discharges turns out to be difficult and complicated... We had one discharge (shot 22), which shows Te0 exceeding 4keV. There were several shots (shot 23, 25, 26, 34) which shows a break-in-slope in core soft X ray signal, and the increase of Te0 by about 0.5 keV (from 3keV to 3.5keV) Also, ITB foot points seems to be narrower in these discharge. There is one shot (shot 32) which shows a long delay of the sawtooth restart. Shot 21 and 27 had a strong instability probably due to mode locking. Good experience to me is that ICRF can run without much trouble with these low current plasmas. It did not show a positive effect on LHCD, but the reason is still unclear. Also, there seems the enhancement of fast electron driven? mode during ICRF (see David log book) |
| Entered: Dec 1 2010 07:51:31:113PM |
| Author: Greg Wallace |
| SL summary for 1101201(AM)
MP612: Expanded exploration of LHCD Density Limit The goal of this run day was to explore the possible synergistic effects of combining double null discharges with reduced inner wall gaps. Previous runs have shown that these two changes can have positive effects on fast electron generation with LHCD at high density. The run plan included six steps: 1) Establish double null with large inner gap at ~600 kW LH, nl_04=4.5e19. (1-2 shots) 2) Scan inner gap during LH from nominal value (~1.25 cm) to zero at nl_04=4.5e19. Scan of inner gap will be dynamic during LH pulse. Outer gap should be ~constant during inner gap scan. (2-3 shots) 3) Increase density to nl_04=7e19 without transition to H-mode. Adjust outer gap as necessary to prevent ionization at LH grill. (2-4 shots) 4) Repeat of step 2 at higher density. Scan inner gap during LH from nominal value (~1.25 cm) to zero at nl_04=7e19. Scan of inner gap will be dynamic during LH pulse. Outer gap should be ~constant during inner gap scan. (2-3 shots) 5) Maintain steady inner gap of 0.3 cm. Ramp density from 4.5-8e19 during LH. (2-3 shots) 6) If time allows, increase LH power to maximum available (~1 MW) to see how much current can be driven at high density in double null with small inner gap. Unfortunately, only step 1 was definitively achieved (shots 2-3). Step 2 was attempted several times but we moved on since it appeared impossible to maintain accurate density control while approaching zero inner gap. Most of the morning was spent on step 3, however problems were encountered with H-modes and disruptions. On each attempt to apply LH to high density (nebar = 1.3e20) double nulls, the plasma would go into H-mode then vertically disrupt (according to Granetz and Wolfe). Jerry suggested that we were actually seeing radiative disruptions since the upper strike point was on the cryopump slots? Either way, we did not get what we wanted. One attempt was made to get a high density double null with a small inner gap but as usual it went into H-mode and disrupted. Before trying this experiment again we should come up with a plan on how to keep these high density double nulls from getting into H-mode and disrupting. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Dec 1 2010 04:46:57:627PM |
| Author: Robert Granetz |
Run summary for Wednesday 2010/12/01
MP612 - Expanded exploration of LHCD Density Limit
MP553 - Creation of revearsed sheer current profile using LH on low Ip plasmas
Session leader: G. Wallace and S. Shiraiwa
Physics operator: R. Granetz
We ran MP612 for the first half of the day, and MP553 for the 2nd half.
MP612 involved running double null configuration, and ramping CLEARIN and
RCUR on a subset of shots to vary the inboard gap down to fully limited.
The first set of shots went well, but then we raised the density and
started getting LH-induced H-modes and disruptions due to vertical
instability. We tried reducing the elongation, and decreasing LH power to
stay in L-mode, and even reloading an earlier full-length shot, but nothing
worked, and we didn't solve the vertical stability problem.
MP553 involved low current (0.4 MA), low density (nl_04=0.3e20 m-2) plasmas
with LH and some ICRF, as well as the DNB and MSE. All systems worked
quite well during this half of the day. There were not computer/network
issues today.
Scorecard: 32 plasmas (no early shutdowns)
1 dud (cryopump burped)
1 fizzles
0 power supply tests
0 no-power MDS shot cycle
--------------
Total: 34 shot cycles
|
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Dec 1 2010 09:05:33:923AM | 1101201001 | Greg Wallace | Attempt to make double null discharge with LH, nl_04=4.5e19. Disruption at .24 s. Current turns around at .2 s. Next shot will repeat. |
| Dec 1 2010 09:25:20:337AM | 1101201002 | Greg Wallace | Plasma. Not quite double null but very close. A few trips at very end of LH pulse and some hot spots on the A and B rows.
Changes: Increase ZCUR by 2mm to get closer to DN. Decrease RCUR by 2mm to make outer gap slightly bigger. Try again for more steady density and clean LH. |
| Dec 1 2010 09:35:24:850AM | 1101201003 | Greg Wallace | One trip at very end of LH pulse. Otherwise looks good. Density control pretty good. This will suffice for step 1 of the run plan.
Next shot will move on to step 2---low density inner gap scan. |
| Dec 1 2010 09:47:23:930AM | 1101201004 | Greg Wallace | Several LH trips at end of gap scan. Otherwise looks pretty good. Small hot spots on A and B rows.
Will back down a bit on LH power. Going from 160 kW/klystron to 145 kW/klystron. Will also try to get inner gap scan to go all the way to zero during LH. |
| Dec 1 2010 10:10:53:970AM | 1101201005 | Greg Wallace | Density a bit high and ramping down during the discharge. Two trips late in LH pulse. Will try again for better density control. |
| Dec 1 2010 10:13:21:310AM | 1101201006 | Greg Wallace | LH ran clean. Good shot except for density excursion just before inner gap goes to zero. Will repeat to see if inner wall cleans up. |
| Dec 1 2010 10:30:11:520AM | 1101201007 | Greg Wallace | Two trips just before plasma hits inner wall limited. Density also bumps up as we approach limited discharge. Will punt on step 2 for now. Moving on to step 3 in the interest of time. Next shot will have steady large inner gap with higher density (nl_04 = 7e19). |
| Dec 1 2010 10:46:16:773AM | 1101201008 | Greg Wallace | Many trips after 1.0 s. Looks like too much density at the grill. Lots of ionization on B and C rows. Decreasing LH power to 140 kW/klystron. Will decrease RCUR by 2.0 mm and try again. |
| Dec 1 2010 10:56:45:947AM | 1101201009 | Greg Wallace | Disruption at 1.0 s. LH camera looks OK. Unintended H-mode at .87 s. Will try again. |
| Dec 1 2010 11:10:32:553AM | 1101201010 | Greg Wallace | Another H-mode and disruption. Try again. |
| Dec 1 2010 11:21:06:240AM | 1101201011 | Greg Wallace | Dud. |
| Dec 1 2010 11:33:59:597AM | 1101201012 | Greg Wallace | Fizzle. |
| Dec 1 2010 12:08:31:980PM | 1101201013 | Greg Wallace | H-mode and disruption again. LH ran clean up to disruption. Reflection coefficient becomes noisier after transition to H-mode at 0.95 s. Next shot will increase RCUR by 2mm to see if that helps prevent vertical disruption. |
| Dec 1 2010 12:09:51:057PM | 1101201014 | Greg Wallace | H-mode and disruption again. Next shot will try again with LH into dummy load. |
| Dec 1 2010 12:35:00:110PM | 1101201015 | Greg Wallace | Shot ran full length without LH. H-mode seems to be the problem. Will try again with lower LH power. |
| Dec 1 2010 12:35:39:560PM | 1101201016 | Greg Wallace | Disruption at 0.45 s. Bob is not getting his candy bar from me yet. |
| Dec 1 2010 01:00:04:267PM | 1101201017 | Greg Wallace | Went into H-mode and disrupted again. One more shot. Next shot will decrease inner gap to 3mm while keeping outer gap ~constant. |
| Dec 1 2010 01:08:19:580PM | 1101201018 | Greg Wallace | Disruption a little later this time. Last shot on this MP.
Inner gap was smaller, ~5 mm. |
| Dec 1 2010 01:28:59:397PM | 1101201019 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | First shot for the second MP
Try to repeat 1101119006 |
| Dec 1 2010 01:29:20:810PM | 1101201019 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | First shot for the second MP
Try to repeat 1101119006. Disrupted at 1.1 due to the vertical instability |
| Dec 1 2010 01:36:42:523PM | 1101201020 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length,
Injection at 1.15 s |
| Dec 1 2010 01:39:59:523PM | 1101201020 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length,
Injection at 1.15 s Next : increase LH power to 160 KW for each and increase outer gap by 5mm |
| Dec 1 2010 01:41:59:250PM | 1101201020 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length,
Injection at 1.15 s Next : increase LH power to 160 KW for each and increase outer gap by 5mm Asked ICRF starting from 1.65 s to 1.8 s by 200kW |
| Dec 1 2010 02:06:13:290PM | 1101201021 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length
Locked...? Coherent oscillation on soft X-ray core channels. |
| Dec 1 2010 02:06:24:220PM | 1101201022 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length |
| Dec 1 2010 02:11:27:830PM | 1101201022 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length
Temperature jumps up to > 4keV.. |
| Dec 1 2010 02:11:48:433PM | 1101201022 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length Close to net zero OH flux swing.
Temperature jumps up to > 4keV.. |
| Dec 1 2010 02:14:13:717PM | 1101201022 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length Close to net zero OH flux swing.
Temperature jumps up to > 4keV.. Next: increase LH to 190kW and ICRF after LH to 500 kW |
| Dec 1 2010 02:19:35:967PM | 1101201022 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length Close to net zero OH flux swing.
Temperature jumps up to > 4keV.. Clean LH Next: increase LH to 190kW and ICRF after LH to 500 kW |
| Dec 1 2010 02:20:00:387PM | 1101201023 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length |
| Dec 1 2010 02:26:51:430PM | 1101201023 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length
Next: turn off Ar |
| Dec 1 2010 02:29:37:890PM | 1101201023 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length
Moderate increase of Te at 1.14s Central soft X-ray behaves similarly Next: turn off Ar |
| Dec 1 2010 02:30:26:410PM | 1101201023 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length
Moderate increase of Te at 1.14s Central soft X-ray behaves similarly Next: turn off Ar, ICRF after LH to be 500kW |
| Dec 1 2010 02:46:09:140PM | 1101201024 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length.
Next : Increase LH power |
| Dec 1 2010 02:47:04:937PM | 1101201025 | Syunichi Shiraiwa |
Ar off |
| Dec 1 2010 02:51:59:300PM | 1101201025 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length, Ar off
|
| Dec 1 2010 03:03:43:357PM | 1101201025 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length, Ar off
Next : Ar on |
| Dec 1 2010 03:05:59:270PM | 1101201026 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length
Te0 trace is same as shot 25 Next : Going Step 2 |
| Dec 1 2010 03:13:54:987PM | 1101201026 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length
Te0 trace is same as shot 25, Looks like Ar puff did not make a clear change....? Next : Going Step 2 |
| Dec 1 2010 03:26:38:100PM | 1101201027 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length
Injection Next : Moving on step 3. ICRF from 1.05 to 1.45s, 200kW |
| Dec 1 2010 03:28:05:210PM | 1101201027 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length
Injection Next : Moving on step 3. Let's move ICRF from 1.05 to 1.45s, 200kW and reduce LH power back to 180 for each Klystron. |
| Dec 1 2010 03:34:22:737PM | 1101201027 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length
Injection Next : Moving on step 3. Let's move ICRF from 1.05 to 1.45s, 200kW and reduce LH power back to 180 for each Klystron. Put phasing back to 90 deg. |
| Dec 1 2010 03:36:51:097PM | 1101201028 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length
Next : LH 180 deg and ICRF 500 kW |
| Dec 1 2010 03:54:57:817PM | 1101201029 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length
Higher loop voltage after 1.05s Next: 2.7e19 m-3 w/o locking !? |
| Dec 1 2010 04:30:01:870PM | 1101201031 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length
Instability at 1.15s Next: 3.3e19 m-3 w/o locking !? |
| Dec 1 2010 04:39:12:953PM | 1101201032 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length
Instability at 1.15s Next 80 deg. phasing |
| Dec 1 2010 05:27:56:847PM | 1101201034 | Syunichi Shiraiwa | Full length
ICRF started from 1.3 s 500kW. The increase of loop voltage seems dramatically large... |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Dec 1 2010 08:53:49:373AM | Robert Granetz | The starting shot for MP553 is loaded in seg 2, and the starting shot for MP612 is loaded in seg 3. We'll start with MP612 in order to allow more time for bringing the DNB voltage up, so I've turned off seg 2 and turned on seg 3. | |
| Dec 1 2010 09:05:50:857AM | 1101201001 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 01 -- Plasma, but very short. Looks like a big injection starting at t=0.19 s. Startup
looks good.
Next shot: no changes, try again
|
| Dec 1 2010 09:24:03:863AM | 1101201002 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 02 -- Plasma, full length. 0.8 MA, 5.4 T, 0.5-0.4e20 m-2, LSN but close to DN, cryopump
Next shot: reduce seg 3 gas puffing; set nl_04 to 0.45e20 m-2; raise ZCUR by 2 mm from t=0.7-1.2 s to
bring closer to double null; move RCUR in by 2 mm over the same time span to increase
outer gap.
|
| Dec 1 2010 09:38:50:220AM | 1101201003 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 03 -- Plasma, full length. 0.81 MA, 5.4 T, 0.45e20 m-2, DN, cryopump.
Next shot: implement a CLEARIN inner gap dynamic scan, starting at t=0.7 s and ending with a limited
plasma at t=1.2 s. Program RCUR appropriately to keep outer gap constant.
|
| Dec 1 2010 09:46:23:807AM | 1101201004 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 04 -- Plasma, full length. Inner gap scan just misses becoming limited. Outer gap is
very steady.
Next shot: Tweak CLEARIN scan another 2 mm to unambiguously limit on inboard wall. Tweak RCUR
by 1 mm also to keep outer gap constant.
|
| Dec 1 2010 10:05:31:993AM | 1101201005 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 05 -- Plasma, full length. P_LH=0.7 MW. Plasma just barely limits at end of CLEARIN ramp.
Density is a bit high early in the flattop.
Next shot: tweak CLEARIN and RCUR ramps; adjust ZCUR to make plasma USN at start of flattop in
order to better control density with cryopump
|
| Dec 1 2010 10:15:30:960AM | 1101201006 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 06 -- Plasma, nearly full length. Plasma definitely limited towards end of CLEARIN
ramp, as evidenced by light on the WIDE2 view. Density rises a bit at this
time, maybe from inboard wall fueling. Hopefully that will decrease over the
next few shots. P_LH=0.7 MW
Next shot: repeat, no changes
|
| Dec 1 2010 10:22:34:610AM | 1101201006 | Robert Granetz | There might be an air leak on the tokamak (noticed on the RGA after shot 6. |
| Dec 1 2010 10:29:52:873AM | 1101201007 | Robert Granetz | Shot 07 -- Plasma, nearly full length. Good inner gap scan. P_LH=0.7 MW. No sign of any air leak. Next shot: increase nl_04 to 0.7e20 m-2; remove CLEARIN and RCUR scans |
| Dec 1 2010 10:44:19:547AM | 1101201008 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 08 -- Plasma, full length. 0.81 MA, 5.4 T, 0.76e20 m-2, near DN, cryopump, no gap scan.
LH faulted a lot.
Next shot: move RCUR in by 2 mm to increase outer gap
|
| Dec 1 2010 10:56:17:890AM | 1101201009 | Robert Granetz | Shot 09 -- Plasma, disrupted at t=0.99 s. I think it was hit by an impurity injection. Next shot: repeat, no changes |
| Dec 1 2010 11:13:06:850AM | 1101201010 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 10 -- Plasma, disrupted at t=1.05 s. Doesn't look like an injection though. It's on
the edge of being vertically unstable. kappa=1.75-1.80
Next shot: move ZXL up by 4 mm and ZXU down by 4 mm to reduce elongation
|
| Dec 1 2010 11:22:59:047AM | 1101201011 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 11 -- Dud. Probably due to a cryopump regeneration before the shot, but the ratiomatic gauge
wasn't on. All the power supplies worked well.
Next shot: try again
|
| Dec 1 2010 11:38:23:380AM | 1101201012 | Robert Granetz | Shot 12 -- Fizzle. Bz is too high. Next shot: add -15 A to IC_EF4 |
| Dec 1 2010 12:03:18:440PM | 1101201013 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 13 -- Plasma, disrupted at t=1.06 s due to vertical instability, even though the elongation has
been reduced to 1.73 on this shot. There's a transition to H-mode around then too. Can't
see what the problem is.
Next shot: reload seg 3 from shot 8 seg 3 (the last full-length shot)
|
| Dec 1 2010 12:09:00:930PM | 1101201014 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 14 -- Plasma, but again disrupted at t=1.05 s. This is a repeat of shot 8, which was full length.
This shot also started into H-mode, whereas shot 8 did not.
Next shot: repeat, but turn off the LH.
|
| Dec 1 2010 12:27:00:390PM | 1101201015 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 15 -- Plasma, full length (finally). This shot had the LH turned off, and we did not go into
H-mode, and we did not go vertically unstable. It's pretty clear that those three things
are linked together, at least in the double-null plasmas. We can try USN, or lower LH
power, or increase the density.
Next shot: turn LH back on, but at reduced power; no DPCS changes
|
| Dec 1 2010 12:38:57:787PM | 1101201016 | Robert Granetz | Shot 16 -- Plasma, but disrupted at t=0.45 because a PF breaker pulled. Next shot: repeat, no changes (reduced LH power) |
| Dec 1 2010 01:00:09:203PM | 1101201017 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 17 -- Plasma, but disrupts at t=1.05 s again due to vertical instability, which has something
to do with going into H-mode with the LH power.
Next shot: decrease inboard gap by 9 mm (to be 3 mm) and decrease RCUR by 4.5 mm to keep
the outer gap the same
|
| Dec 1 2010 01:12:01:577PM | 1101201018 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 18 -- Plasma, but disrupted at t=1.22 s, again due to vertical instability. This shot briefly when
into H-mode, but it was back in L-mode when the disruption occurred.
End of MP612 for today.
Next shot: start on MP553 by turning on seg 2 and turning off seg 3. Fire DNB.
|
| Dec 1 2010 01:28:12:310PM | 1101201019 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 19 -- Plasma, disrupts at t=1.12 s due to issues with EF2s and EF4. 0.42 MA, 5.4 T, 0.3e20 m-2,
USN, cryopump. P_LH=0.7 MW
Next shot: reduce IC_EF4 to 500 A (from 2500 A) as per Steve Wolfe's suggestion
|
| Dec 1 2010 01:41:57:140PM | 1101201020 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 20 -- Plasma, full length. Shot lasts until t=2.1 s. 0.4 MA, 5.4 T, 0.3e20 m-2, USN, cryopump.
P_LH=0.7 MW. DNB fired 6 pulses. ECE and TS showed bizarre central electron temperatures.
Neuts_hards saturated after t=1.2 s through the end of the discharge.
Next shot: move RCUR in by 2 mm; turn on ICRF at t=1.65 s
|
| Dec 1 2010 01:55:05:957PM | 1101201021 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 21 -- Plasma, full length. 0.42 MA, 5.4 T, 0.3e20 m-2, USN, cryopump. P_LH=0.8 MW.
P_ICRF=0.25 MW late in the shot from J only. DNB fired.
Next shot: move RCUR in another 3 mm to increase outer gap some more
|
| Dec 1 2010 02:13:32:793PM | 1101201022 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 22 -- Plasma, full length. Similar to preceding shot, except that outer gap has increased
to 2.1 cm. P_Lh=0.8 MW, P_ICRF=0.25 MW.
Next shot: no DPCS changes; increase LH power; increase ICRF power
|
| Dec 1 2010 02:24:50:247PM | 1101201023 | Robert Granetz | Shot 23 -- Plasma, full length. P_LH=0.9 MW, P_ICRF=0.25 MW. DNB fired. Next shot: turn off argon |
| Dec 1 2010 02:46:34:243PM | 1101201024 | Robert Granetz |
Shot 24 -- Plasma, full length. Similar to preceding shots. P_LH=0.9 MW, P_ICRF=0.6 MW.
Good DNB. No argon.
Next shot: add -10 A to IC_EF4
|
| Dec 1 2010 02:54:31:757PM | 1101201025 | Robert Granetz | Shot 25 -- Plasma, full length. Same as preceding shots. P_LH=0.92 MW, P_ICRF=0.5 MW. Good DNB. Next shot: move RCUR in by 1 mm; turn on argon puff |
| Dec 1 2010 03:12:28:820PM | 1101201026 | Robert Granetz | Shot 26 -- Plasma, full length. Same-o, same-o. P_LH=0.92 MW, P_ICRF=0.78 MW. Good DNB. Next shot: add another -5 A to IC_EF4; LH phasing will be changed |
| Dec 1 2010 03:28:43:727PM | 1101201027 | Robert Granetz | Shot 27 -- Plasma, disrupted at t=1.43 s due to an impurity injection. Next shot: add +10 A to IC_EF4; ICRF power will be turned on earlier |
| Dec 1 2010 03:38:32:523PM | 1101201028 | Robert Granetz | Shot 28 -- Plasma, full length. Same discharge. P_LH=0.83 MW, P_ICRF=0.26 MW. Good DNB. Next shot: no DPCS changes |
| Dec 1 2010 03:50:42:507PM | 1101201029 | Robert Granetz | Shot 29 -- Plasma, full length. P_LH=0.89 MW, P_ICRF=0.6 MW Next shot: tweak PG3 gas programming in seg 1; reduce nl_04 to 0.27e20 m-2 |
| Dec 1 2010 04:12:10:620PM | 1101201030 | Robert Granetz | Shot 30 -- Plasma, full length. Next shot: no DPCS changes |
| Dec 1 2010 04:28:21:860PM | 1101201030 | Robert Granetz | Shot 31 -- Plasma, full length. Same as preceding shots. Next shot: increase nl_04 to 0.33e20 m-2 |
| Dec 1 2010 04:41:25:683PM | 1101201032 | Robert Granetz | Shot 32 -- Plasma, full length. Same. Next shot: no DPCS changes; no ICRF |
| Dec 1 2010 04:50:58:077PM | 1101201033 | Robert Granetz | Shot 33 -- Plasma, full length. Same. Next shot: reduce nl_04 to 0.30e20 m-2; turn ICRF back on |
| Dec 1 2010 04:51:07:670PM | 1101201034 | Robert Granetz | Shot 34 -- Plasma, full length. Same. P_LH=0.98 MW, P_ICRF=0.5 MW End of run |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 09:01:26:717AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 2 | 09:14:07:147AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 09:26:54:510AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 09:39:35:163AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 09:53:25:520AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 10:08:12:680AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 10:22:28:337AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 10:36:43:890AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 10:50:58:630AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 11:04:41:090AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 11:19:08:580AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 11:31:49:897AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 11:44:22:293AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 12:04:41:240PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 12:17:12:660PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 12:31:23:183PM | Plasma | Bad | OH2L commutation fault |
| 17 | 12:52:07:363PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 01:04:31:743PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 01:17:18:127PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 01:30:30:860PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 01:46:21:680PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 02:04:10:653PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 02:17:13:057PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 02:30:39:100PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 02:48:51:320PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 03:02:05:673PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 03:17:26:590PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 03:29:58:810PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 03:44:13:290PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 30 | 03:59:49:407PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 31 | 04:12:56:220PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 32 | 04:29:09:503PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 33 | 04:43:16:577PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 34 | 04:56:45:690PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| System Availability | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dec 1 2010 09:01:08:813AM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||