| Miniproposals | ||||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Jerry Hughes,Phil Snyder |
| Physics operator(s): | Steve Scott |
| Engineering operator(s): | Andy Pfeiffer,Bill Parkin,Bill Byford |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| automatically entered by signon - please replace with real comment |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Dec 13 2010 09:39:55:347PM |
| Author: Jerry Hughes |
| Run plan for MP578: Testing EPED in ELMy H-mode; shape variation.
SL: J. Hughes, P. Snyder PO: S. Scott Special Gas Request: fill B-side lower with 1psi Ar Hybrid enabled (PG1) fill H-bottom with 3psi Ne Hybrid enabled (PG5) fill NINJA with 10 psi D2 DISABLED Boronization: Was done on Sunday. ECDC: Do 2 hours in He in the morning before the run begins. --gas and pressure: He at 1e-4 Torr --sweep: 45/43/103 cm --scan: 20/120 s ICRF: All transmitters available for D(H) heating at 5.4T. LH: none requested Cryopump: no DNB: yes, for CXRS DIAGNOSTICS: Core/edge TS All ECE's. Optimize where possible for pedestal diagnosis at 5.4T Fast magnetics Core and SOL Reflectometry PCI Fast D-alpha edge CXRS Hirex Sr. Run plan: The main goal for this run is to extend the shape parameters over which we have ELMy H-mode data. The first part of the run will be an attempt to scan elongation while keeping the lower X-point essentially fixed. The target values for [RXL, ZXL] are [51.1, 36.8]cm. First shot: -We will begin with a promising shot that had kappa=1.54, with a JFT-2M like lower X-point: 1101117025. PO should load this shot and adjust the X-point programming to obtain something closer to the correct [RXL,ZXL]. Increase RXL by 0.5cm and increase ZXL by 0.5cm. Keep Ip, Bt and nl04 programs where they are. -Let's have diagnostic Ar. Enable B-side lower and apply a 50ms pulse from PG1 at 300ms. -Set H-bottom to chopper control. (An example of how to do this can be found under the PO entry of 1100826010) Apply a 40% pulse to PG5 from 0.4 to 0.6s. -ICRF should begin boronization recovery with 2--3MW, flat from 0.7 to 1.5s Part I: Boronization recovery and shape development (~5--8 shots) -Use boronization recovery discharges to develop discharges with a range of kappa, and fixed X-point. Shot by shot, decrease the ZXU program, and perhaps increase the ZCUR demand, reaching kappa of 1.7 if possible. Changes in elongation will change the realized position of the lower X-point, and so tweaks will have to made to [RXL,ZXL] as we go. Adjust Ne puff demand as SL (with Reinke's help) deems desirable. [Here there will likely be a short break for edge TS fiber positioning, with the chosen position based on the results of Part I. Part II: Density scans at various kappa values (~10--15 shots) Choosing suitable equilibria from Part I, apply 3MW of ICRF, flat from 0.7 to 1.5s. Perform a density scan at each elongation to map out the EDA/ELM-free/ELMy boundary. Alter the ICRF pulse, and apply Ne seeding as dictated by the machine response. Document pedestal/ELM behavior. At higher values of Pin/nebar, it may be necessary to puff some D2 into the H-modes, either using nl04 feedback or the NINJA. Part III: Upper triangularity variation (~5--8 shots) Choose a suitable target from Part II, and attempt to adjust upper triangularity through changes in RXU. Document pedestal/ELM behavior. Part IV: Lower triangularity variation (~5--8 shots) Choose a suitable target from Part III, and adjust lower triangularity through changes in RXL. Document pedestal/ELM behavior. |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Entered: Dec 13 2010 02:42:05:797PM |
| Author: Steve Scott |
| -----------------
Engineering Setup ----------------- Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 17:00 Power systems as on: 1101117025 (LSN) Acoil: +Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot (standard) Hybrid Enabled Gas setup (SPECIAL): Fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid ENABLED (PG4) fill B-side lower with 1 psi Argon Hybrid ENABLED (PG1) leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) fill B-main (C-side) with 40 psi D2 Hybrid ENABLED (PG3) fill NINJA with 10 psi D2 Hybrid DISABLED fill H-bottom with 3-psi Neon Hybrid ENABLED (PG5) Enable gate-valves and shutters: ECE, VUV, HiREX Sr, Xeus Leave z-bolo shutter as is (should be open) Torvac gatevalve toggle (yes/no): no Boronization(yes/no): yes, was completed on Sunday Overnight ECDC (yes/no): NO overnight ECDC. Want 2 hrs ECDC in AM before run. ICRF(yes/no): yes. all transmitters for D(H) heating @5.4 Tesla LH(yes/no): no Cryopump (yes/no): no DNB (yes/no): yes, for CXRS Vessel temperature: 35/35/35 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ECDC Parameters. 2 hours in morning before start of experiment ---------------------------------------------------------------- gas and pressure: Helium at 1e-4 Torr sweep: 45/43/103 cm scan: 20/120 s * ******************************************************************** * Startup * Load from shot 1101117025 with the following changes: RXL = -0.040 --> -0.035 to change real RXL from 50.6 to 51.1 cm ZXL = +0.007 --> +0.012 to change real ZXL from -37.3 to -36.8 Enable B-side lower, use existing programmed PG1 50ms pulse starting 0.300 Set H-bottom to chopper control. Apply 40% pulse on PG5 from 0.4-0.6 sec. * ******************************************************************* * * Part I: Boronization recovery and discharge development (8-10 shots) * ICRF: begin boronization recovery at 2-3 MW, flat from t=0.7 --> 1.5 sec * Following successful startup shot, make adjustments to ZXU & ZCUR to develop an ensemble of plasma shapes at fixed lower X-point with a range of kappa. First change will be: ZXU = 0.08 --> 0.04 and (simultaneously) increase ZCUR by 1 cm. * Subsequent changes will depend on outcome of first change. Roughly, the quantum changes in ZXU will be 1-2 cm and changes in ZCUR will be 0.5 - 1.0 cm. May have to adjust demand [RXL, ZXL] in response to changes to ZXU and ZCUR to maintain a fixed lower X-point location. * *************************************************************** * * Part II: Density scans at various elongations * Choose best equilibria from Part I. Apply PRF=3 MW, flat from 0.7-1.5 sec. Perform density scan at each elongation, 'a few' shots per scan. First-order objective is to document pedestal behavior in ELMy Hmode, so maximum target density may be set by transition to EDA H-mode (probably less than factor 2 variation in target NeL). But depending on results, may choose to document some pedestal behavior in EDA H-mode also. May adjust ICRF pulse and Ne seeding as needed to get desired ELM behavior. * *************************************************************** * * Part III: effect of upper triangularity * Choose suitable equilibrium from Part II. Adjust upper triangularity by changing demand to RXU. Document pedestal / ELM behavior. * *************************************************************** * * Part IV: effect of lower triangularity * Choose suitable equilibrium from Part III. Adjust lower trianglularity by changing demand to RXL. Document pedestal / ELM behavior. |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Dec 14 2010 05:30:34:223PM |
| Author: Jerry Hughes |
|
The main purpose of today's run was to extend the ELMy H-mode data set on C-Mod to a larger range of plasma elongation and, if possible, triangularity. The experiment was successful on these fronts. H-mode plasmas were obtained in equilibria with a JFT-2M-like lower X-point, and with kappa varied from 1.45 (the typical ELMy H-mode value) to just over 1.6. With variations in density and power programming, we were able to obtain ELMs with kappa up to about 1.58. ELMy access was greatly enhanced at kappa of 1.55 and less. A broad target density scan was carried out at kappa=1.54, allowing us to document the empirical boundary between ELMy H-mode and EDA H-mode in this condition. (The QCM is favored by nu*,95>1) Toward the end of the run we were able to compare shots at kappa=1.54, with varied upper triangularity. When delta_u was ~0.2, ELMs appeared early in the H-mode and the rise in radiated power was quite tolerable (Shot 029). For delta_u~0.4, and with other plasma parameters nearly identical (Shot 032), the H-mode was ELM-free, and the radiated power rose uncontrollably. An interpretation is that the very weak shaping in the former case destabilized the ELMs. These will be very interesting data points to compare using detailed studies of peeling-ballooning stability with ELITE. |
| Entered: Dec 14 2010 06:37:06:253PM |
| Author: Phil Snyder |
| This was a very productive run, many thanks to all those involved.
The goal was to vary the plasma shape to explore changes both in the pedestal structure and in ELM/EDA/ELM-free behavior. An important motivation for this experiment is the 2011 Joint Research Target on pedestal structure, including tests of peeling-ballooning stability and the EPED pedestal model. After boronization recovery and shape development, ELMing discharges in the typical "JFT-2M" ELMing shape (kappa~1.45, delta_u~0.15-0.2, delta_l~0.7-0.8) were reproduced (eg shots 12, 15, 17). Then the elongation was then increased to ~1.52 and ELMs were again observed (shots 18 & 19). Next the elongation was increased to kappa~1.6, and delta_u up to ~0.35. In these discharges (20-23), a high pedestal pressure was achieved early in the discharge, but no significant ELMs were observed, even in shots 22-23 where delta_u was reduced. Reducing elongation slightly to 1.58 in shot 24 led to a return of ELMs. ELMs are achieved less robustly in this shape, suggesting it is near the limiting case for the ELMing regime. Next we went back to the kappa~1.52 shape and did a density scan, resulting in multiple good shots (29,30,31) with long ELMing periods. These should be good candidates for ELM-synched analysis. In shot 32 the upper triangularity was increased, resulting in a longer ELM-free period before ELMs onset. One possible hypothesis to explain these observations is via the strong sensitivity of peeling-ballooning stability to changes in the plasma shape (particularly a strong increase in peeling-ballooning stability with elongation). It appears that, at low density, there is an effective maximum pedestal height that can be achieved due to balance of input power with radiative losses (and, when present, QC and other loss mechanisms). When peeling-ballooning stability is poor (weak shaping), it is possible to reach the peeling-ballooning stability limit, and ELMs will occur, and the pedestal height will vary as expected according to P-B stability (and the EPED model). As the shape is improved, and the peeling-ballooning stability boundary moves upward, it eventually becomes so high that the pedestal does not reach it and goes to ELM-free (low density) with large radiative losses, or to EDA (high density). If this hypothesis is correct, it suggests that higher pedestals and higher performance may be possible in C-Mod if a method can be found to control radiative losses in low density, high power plasmas. We plan to test this hypothesis via studies with the EPED model and also detailed peeling-ballooning stability studies using reconstructed kinetic equilibria which capture plasma shape in detail. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Dec 14 2010 05:18:42:573PM |
| Author: Steve Scott |
| This was a reasonably successful run. We explored a variety of plasma shapes with RF heating to explore the effect of elongation & triangularlity on the
pedestal height & compare to EPED1. Shot cycles: 34 Test shots: 1 shot attempts: 33 plasmas: 32 fizzle/dud 1 Lesson learned: adding ~1 MW of RF power for ~300 ms into the Ip rampdown does seem to be helpful in eliminating (or reducing probability of) disruptions in rampdown. On shot 33, we tried to make a shape with very low upper triangularity by moving RXU out significantly ... this resulted in EF2-Upper railing, leading to a disruption. One puzzle is that changing the NeL demand in the pre-RF phase does change the NeL, even though the NeL demand remains far less than the actual NeL that is obtained in the shot. For example, on shot 31 we asked for NeL=6.e19 from t=0.5-1.0, and we actually got NeL=1.1e20. Some of the early shots used neon to control surface heating, but this was abandoned in the later shots. Also, we had argon in some of the early shots, and this was also abandoned. Quite a few shots had impurity injections, usually moly, large enough to either affect stored energy and/or disrupt the plasma. To reduce these injections, we (a) changed plasma shape; and/or (b) reduced RF power. For future MP planning, this run day may be useful for documenting existence-proofs of a variety of plasma shapes (all LSN). Trophy shot of the day is 29. |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Dec 14 2010 08:57:47:130AM | 1101214001 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 1.
Gas test. |
| Dec 14 2010 09:18:29:617AM | 1101214002 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 2.
Attempt: kappa~1.55 with JFT-2M X-point. Result: Shape looks pretty decent. Got some RF. Mulitple H-modes, last one steady EDA. Some nasty injections early on. A couple of issues: (1) Too much density because PG3 puff was left high follwing gas test. (2) No Ne, because there was no gas programming for PG5. PO is fixing this for next shot. |
| Dec 14 2010 09:29:06:733AM | 1101214003 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 3.
Result: Density is better. Plenty of Ne. Back off for next shot (40%-->30%) X-point is not exactly at its target. But, leave as is for next shot. |
| Dec 14 2010 09:41:59:990AM | 1101214004 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 4:
Request: TF increase by 0.1T for improved FRCECE coverage of pedestal. Reduction of Ne puff. Result: EDA H-mode. Still plenty of Ne. Density is still high before the H-mode |
| Dec 14 2010 09:52:55:427AM | 1101214005 | Phil Snyder | Again we are seeing a high pedestal pressure phase early in the shot (~0.78-0.87s), and then a marked drop in pedestal pressure in the latter stages. No significant ELMs yet, presumably need to get density down. |
| Dec 14 2010 09:54:45:733AM | 1101214005 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 5.
Request: Actually increase Bt this time. And disable H-bottom for a comparison without a Ne puff. Result: Bt=5.48T. FRCECE coverage is closer to spanning the LCFS. Nudge again for next shot. Also for next shot, reenable Ne puff and reducd puff demand from 30%-->20% Also lower ZXU by 4 cm, and see what kind of effect on the elongation we get. |
| Dec 14 2010 10:08:22:993AM | 1101214006 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 6.
Change to ZXU didn't change kappa, but increased upper triangularity from 0.18 to 0.27. Result: EDA H-mode, very nice RF. kappa=1.55 delta_u=0.28 delta_l=0.72 |
| Dec 14 2010 10:10:16:380AM | 1101214006 | Phil Snyder | Very steady EDA H-mode with ne_ped~2.4e20. Continue shape development, and then consider going back to JFT-2M shape to get density down and get ELMs. |
| Dec 14 2010 10:22:29:893AM | 1101214007 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 7.
Result: kappa=1.62 delta_u=0.38 delta_l=0.73 This is a decent higher elongation shot with the JFT-2M-like x-point. Next: Make a tweak to the x-point location and lower the density demand. |
| Dec 14 2010 10:41:04:750AM | 1101214008 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 8.
Request: Drop nl04 demand to 4e19 and raise ZXL by 0.5cm. More RF power after 1.1s Result: kappa=1.6 delta_u=0.37 delta_l=0.72 Got a modest power scan in high density, EDA H-mode. Looks like a good case to return to if we can get the density down. |
| Dec 14 2010 10:44:37:333AM | 1101214008 | Phil Snyder | Another steady EDA H-mode at high elongation (~1.6) and triangularity (delta_u~0.36 delta_l~0.72). Density perhaps coming down slightly. Return to lower elongation to try to get lower density and ELMs. |
| Dec 14 2010 11:02:30:533AM | 1101214009 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 9.
Request: Revert to shape parameters of shot 005. Result: EDA H-mode. Some faulting from J-port. kappa=1.52 delta_u=0.2 delta_l=0.72 Pedestal density is not lower. Maybe increased. Next: reduce elongation to the standard JFT-2M case. |
| Dec 14 2010 11:05:23:277AM | 1101214009 | Phil Snyder | Reduced elongation (~1.52) and triangularity (delta_u~0.19, delta_l~.73), but density stays fairly high and no ELMs.
Continue down to lower elongation ~1.45, typical JFT-2M shape. The pedestal pressure is again peaking at ~0.8s in an ELM free phase before EDA fully kicks in. |
| Dec 14 2010 11:19:52:700AM | 1101214010 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 10:
Attempt: Baseline JFT-2M shape. Possible ELM at 0.81s, leading to a fault in E-port. Pedestal Te never really recovers. Still a radiative EDA. kappa=1.45 delta_u=0.14 delta_l=0.70 Next: Disable Ne and Ar. Also have PO decrease RXL by 0.5cm to try to better match X-point location. |
| Dec 14 2010 11:29:30:917AM | 1101214011 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 11.
Attempt: Rerun shot 010 with Ne/Ar diabled. Result: H-mode, with major injection and disruption. Reinke informs me that the seeding gods are "wrathful". Next: Reduce RF demand. |
| Dec 14 2010 11:42:52:557AM | 1101214012 | Phil Snyder | ELMing discharge in typical JFT-2M shape. Density has come down significantly with nebar~2e20 and neped~1.9e20. Thomson not well-aligned for this shape, but pedestal pressure appears in the ballpark of expected value for ELMing shot in this shape. |
| Dec 14 2010 11:47:35:963AM | 1101214012 | Jerry Hughes | SHOT 12.
Retry with more modest RF demands. 2MW-->3MW Got ELMs of rather significant size, fairly regular. Pedestal Te reaches several hundred eV transiently. neped and nebar are lower than at the higher elongation. J-port not very happy with the ELMs, or perhaps the match to the lower density pedestal. |
| Dec 14 2010 11:54:16:873AM | 1101214013 | Phil Snyder | Nice ELMing period from ~0.78-0.9s before a large injection at ~0.93s leads to a high density phase for the rest of the discharge. |
| Dec 14 2010 11:57:31:663AM | 1101214013 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 13.
Retry shot 012 with improved RF, and attempting to further reduce the L-mode density. Result: Good start. A hot H-mode with ELMs. Injection at 0.92 kills it. RF performs suprising well throughout this, the back-transition and the subsequent L-H to EDA H-mode. The nl04 feedback does its job after 0.9s. Next: Put some Ne back in. |
| Dec 14 2010 12:11:46:117PM | 1101214014 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 14.
Ne coming through H-bottom at 1.5psi fill, 50% duty cycle. H-modes with no ELMs, and high radiation. There is some QCM activity. Next: lower Ne puff. |
| Dec 14 2010 12:36:31:380PM | 1101214015 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 15.
Retry with reduced Ne seeding. Result: Some ELMy periods. Zeff is rather high, so plenty of Ne. Still getting injections. I am concerned that we are spending too much time trying to optimize seeding instead of getting on with the shape scans. Next: Disable Ne, come in more gently with the initial RF pulse. Hopefully get a case we can compare with later discharges at higher elongation. |
| Dec 14 2010 12:45:43:860PM | 1101214016 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 16.
Request: Come in with a slower power ramp early. No Ne seeding. Result: due to a miscommunication, the RF was programmed with a step instead of a ramp to 2MW. H-mode was late, and the nl04 step up demand at 0.9s overfuels the plasma, leading to EDA H-mode. Big injections when power is raised. We've seen this before. I can't tell where the injection is coming from, but I am suspicious of the strike point position. Having PO shift RXL inboard for next shot. Also fixing RF demand, and moving the nl04 step-up to 1.0s |
| Dec 14 2010 12:56:10:850PM | 1101214017 | Phil Snyder | Good shot, with a relatively steady period of ELMs mixed with QC. Increased RF power seems to lead to an injection at ~1.3s. Pedestal Te8 roughly steady at ~600eV from 0.8-1.2s.
Ready to start elongation scan. |
| Dec 14 2010 01:02:20:610PM | 1101214017 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 17:
Request RXL move inboard by 0.5cm Result: EFIT says strike point is off the floor tiles which have given us trouble in the past. No big injections ELMy H-mode kappa=1.46 delta_u=0.15 delta_l=0.76 nebar before H-mode=1.2--1.4e20 Next: Recover elongation of shot 9. |
| Dec 14 2010 01:09:19:747PM | 1101214018 | Phil Snyder | Nice shot with substantial ELMs at kappa~1.52. Two periods of high pedestal temperature from ~0.75-0.9s and 1.2-1.35s. RF power is a bit uneven. |
| Dec 14 2010 01:15:46:817PM | 1101214018 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 18:
Attempt: Higher kappa. Result: Nicely ELMing, with two distinct high Te,ped phases. kappa=1.52 delta_u=0.18 delta_l=0.79 nebar before H-mode=1e20 |
| Dec 14 2010 01:26:51:620PM | 1101214019 | Phil Snyder | Very brief hot ELMing phase from ~0.75-.88s, then a large injection occurs and density rises substantially. Later phase has high density with ELMs. |
| Dec 14 2010 01:31:55:077PM | 1101214019 | Jerry Hughes |
Shot 19. Attempt to repeat shot 18 with improved RF match, but also with X-point adjusted slightly to match the positioning on shot 17. Result: Shot showed some promise early, then a big injection at 0.89s. But there are ELMs, evolving with the discharge prior to that. Next: Go to higher elongation. |
| Dec 14 2010 01:42:47:933PM | 1101214020 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 20.
Attempt: Reproduce the shape of shot 8. Result: X-point needs a tweak, but generally okay shape. kappa=1.6 delta_l=0.8 delta_u=0.37 nebar in Ohmic phase=9e19 |
| Dec 14 2010 01:47:10:953PM | 1101214020 | Phil Snyder | Pedestal gets quite high in the early phase, but no significant ELMs. May be a sign that we've improved the pedestal stability so much (via improved shaping) that we can no longer reach the limit (perhaps radiatively limited). Calculations suggest the peeling-ballooning stability boundary should be substantially higher in this shape than in the base JFT-2M shape.
kappa~1.6, delta_u~.37, delta_l~0.8 |
| Dec 14 2010 02:00:22:720PM | 1101214021 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 21.
Retry shot 020 with an X-point tweak. Result: Shape looks good. X-point looks good. No ELMs. kappa=1.61 delta_l=0.76 delta_u=0.38 nebar in Ohmic phase=9e19 Next: Decrease upper triangularity |
| Dec 14 2010 02:14:42:473PM | 1101214022 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 22.
Try to achieve weaker shaping at crown: Result: No ELMs. kappa=1.62 delta_l=0.76 delta_u=0.38 nebar in Ohmic phase=1.1e20 Next: Try for more of a power ramp. |
| Dec 14 2010 02:22:28:837PM | 1101214023 | Phil Snyder | Again has a high pedestal pressure phase from ~0.8-0.95s, but apparently not high enough to trigger ELMs. Radiated power is large, and takes off after ~1.2s - having trouble getting net power (injected - radiated) up despite RF ramp to 4MW. |
| Dec 14 2010 02:34:34:803PM | 1101214023 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 23:
Attempt: More of a power ramp. at the high kappa point. Result: Again, early high Te H-mode with no ELMs. Pedestal density is considerably higher than at the lower kappa. Input power cannot keep up with radiation, and Te drops for a long period in flattop. Interestingly, in this and shot 022, there seems to be improvement in performance after the strike point begins its sweep out after 1.2s. It would be interesting to try this with seeding. Instead, we will try to stay focused and go for an elongation intermediate between 1.52 and 1.62. |
| Dec 14 2010 02:47:57:537PM | 1101214024 | Jerry Hughes | SHot 24.
Good ELMing data in the initial H-mode phase. Healthy Te,ped. Killed by an injection, unfortunately. kappa=1.58 delta_l=0.76 delta_u=0.15 nebar in Ohmic phase=1.05e20 |
| Dec 14 2010 02:55:23:950PM | 1101214024 | Phil Snyder | Elongation reduced slightly to kappa~1.58. Triangularity reduced as well.
Now ELMs return. Nice high pedestal ELMing from ~0.8-0.95s, before an injection and disruption. Speculation: It's starting to look like there's an effective limit on how high we can get the pedestal just based on radiative losses etc. If this limit is above the peeling-ballooning boundary (as it is in the JFT-2M shape) then we get an ELMing discharge. As we increase elongation and increase the P-B boundary, we eventually find a point where we can no longer get to the P-B limit and get ELMs (though presumably if we could reduce radiative losses somehow we could impact this). It looks like that transition point happens around kappa~1.58. (at higher density the QC mode comes in also) |
| Dec 14 2010 02:58:06:820PM | 1101214025 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 25.
Retry shot 024 with higher density. Ohmic nebar hits 1.7e20. H-mode density stays fairly low. There are ELMs. Next: Retry with reduced early density program. |
| Dec 14 2010 03:14:40:643PM | 1101214026 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 26.
Attempt: Repeat 024 with an increased target density, not overfuelled like 025 was. Result: Good shot. Clear ELMs at 0.87s and 0.99s. No clear QCM activity. kappa=1.58 delta_l=0.76 delta_u=0.15 nebar in Ohmic phase=1.15e20 Some peculiar density fluctuations are showing up in PCI and reflectometry on some of these shots, in the ~200kHz range and fairly narrowband. Center frequency is modulated by the sawtooth heat pulse. |
| Dec 14 2010 03:15:12:417PM | 1101214026 | Phil Snyder | Two large ELMs and 3 small ones before an injection at ~1.05s. |
| Dec 14 2010 03:39:44:863PM | 1101214027 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 27.
Attempt: Slightly higher ohmic density. Result: This is weird. At first I thought the thing detatched at 0.5s due to the extra puffing. But there's a Te pedestal there! So it is Ohmic H-mode until 0.7s. Why? |
| Dec 14 2010 03:36:41:607PM | 1101214028 | Phil Snyder | ELMing period with robust pedestal from ~0.8-0.9s.
|
| Dec 14 2010 03:44:55:320PM | 1101214028 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 28.
Retry 026 with a higher power ramp rate. Result: kappa=1.59 delta_l=0.76 delta_u=0.15 nebar in Ohmic phase=1.2e20 The big ELMs from shot 026 aren't there, but there are some smaller ELMs between 0.8 and 0.9s, when the Te is elevated. Next: Reload shot 19 and raise nl04 demand slightly. |
| Dec 14 2010 03:52:33:630PM | 1101214029 | Phil Snyder | Nice shot. Long periods of fairly steady ELMs with controlled density and radiated power. Very promising candidate for analysis, including ELM-synched analysis.
|
| Dec 14 2010 04:00:31:057PM | 1101214029 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 29.
Attempt: Go back to shot 019 and increase nl04 by 1e19. Result: A really fantastic looking shot! There are 2 distinct ELMy periods, with varying power balance and density. RF couples well throughout. ELM frequency drops later in the shot, when pedestal pressure is higher. Scales the wrong way for Type I ELMs. kappa=1.54 delta_u=0.19 delta_l=0.77 nebar before H-mode=1.2e20 |
| Sep 1 2011 08:31:45:757AM | 1101214029 | Jerry Hughes | There are some interesting high-frequency fluctuations on the 88GHz
reflectometer, coming up just before ELMs.
and also on magnetics:
The fluctuations persist in the higher density phase with longer ELM period, and the lab frame frequency scales with the edge Te:
|
| Dec 14 2010 04:16:24:560PM | 1101214030 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 30.
Good shot. Plenty of ELMs to look at, with a good scan in Te,ped. kappa=1.54 delta_u=0.20 delta_l=0.77 Ohmic nebar =1.6e20 |
| Dec 14 2010 04:17:35:123PM | 1101214030 | Phil Snyder | Another good shot for analysis with lots of ELMs. Somewhat higher neped (and lower teped) in early phase, compared to shot 29. |
| Dec 14 2010 04:34:15:763PM | 1101214031 | Phil Snyder | Yet another good shot for analysis with lots of ELMs after the recovery from a back-transition, ~1.1-1.4s.
Pedestal density significantly higher, ~2.5e20, and teped looks a bit lower. |
| Dec 14 2010 04:34:20:263PM | 1101214031 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 31
Attempt: More density. Result: It looks like we're near the end of our ability to raise density. QCM has reappeared in the early H-mode! Pure ELMs back in the latter phases. Good shot. kappa=1.53 delta_u=0.20 delta_l=0.78 Ohmic nebar =1.7e20 As on shot 027, there is on Ohmic H-mode associated with the extra fueling. Something to follow up on? |
| Dec 14 2010 04:47:05:193PM | 1101214032 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 32
Attempt: Reload 29 and increase upper triangularity Result: Matches 29 pretty well in terms of global parameters, but the initial H-mode phase is completely ELM-free! The radiation in the H-mode rises faster! kappa=1.55 delta_u=0.34 delta_l=0.77 Ohmic nebar=1.2e20 |
| Dec 14 2010 04:59:12:047PM | 1101214033 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 33.
Attempt: A large move of RXU relative to 032 in order to try for a very low triangularity. Result: Seem to have pushed it to far. Lost control. No H-mode either. Scratch this and move on to a high delta_L, lower kappa case. |
| Dec 14 2010 05:16:31:200PM | 1101214033 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 33.
Attempt: Low kappa, high delta_u Result: Fizzle. EOR |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Dec 14 2010 08:57:14:903AM | 1101214001 | Steve Scott | Setup from 1101117025 with changes as described in PO_PLAN.
This shot: gas test only. increase PG3 to be flattop at demand of 80 (no change to duration of the PG3 puff). Outcome: successful no-power shot with gas. |
| Dec 14 2010 09:15:50:500AM | 1101214002 | Steve Scott | return PG3 puffing to that of 1101117025.
Start boronization recovery with RF power. Outcome: PhysOp error: I apparently did not load the new PG3 gas puff programming. So gas puff was same as previous shot --> got high plasma density. Also, we did not get the requested H-bottom (PG5) puff of neon. Next shot: re-load PG3 programming as per 1101117025 and also add the H-bottom PG5 puff of neon (40%, 0.4-0.6 sec). |
| Dec 14 2010 09:29:26:013AM | 1101214003 | Steve Scott | result: got 1 - 2.5 MW RF, womewhat ratty time PRF time history.
Halpha is about factor 3-4 higher than 1101117025 and NeL during H-modes is high (circa 1.7e20 m^-2) compared to 1.3e20 on shot 1101117025. Next shot: raise BT by 2% to tweek locations of FRC-ECE (ITF increases from 150 to 153 kA) and decrease PG5 demand level from 40 to 30. |
| Dec 14 2010 09:39:30:513AM | 1101214004 | Steve Scott | result: apparently I changed the TF demand only in segment 1, not in segment 2.
So we did not get the desired 2% increase in BT. Next shot: increase ITF demand in segment 2 to -153 kA. Also remove the neon puff in PG5. |
| Dec 14 2010 09:40:07:197AM | 1101214004 | Steve Scott | result: apparently I changed the TF demand only in segment 1, not in segment 2.
So we did not get the desired 2% increase in BT. Next shot: increase ITF demand in segment 2 to -153 kA. Also disable H-bottom to remove the neon puff. |
| Dec 14 2010 09:58:06:630AM | 1101214005 | Steve Scott | Result: got the desired increase in BT. Pretty good PRF waveform at 3 MW.
Pretty steady radiated power at 0.3 MW. Density is still higher than 1101117025 and the Halpha level is still several times higher. full-length plasma. * * next shot * Increase ITF to 153567 in order to nudge BT up by 0.02 Tesla. re-enable H-bottom, and decrease demand level on PG5 from 30 to 20. also, reduce ZXU demand from 0.08 to 0.04 during flattop. |
| Dec 14 2010 10:08:17:307AM | 1101214006 | Steve Scott | Good shot. Very steady PRF at 3 MW, steady Wtot (about 1.4 times taue89),
steady Prad at 0.7 MW, steady density at 1.7e20. EDA H-mode. small injection at 1.25 sec. disrupted in rampdown at 1.7 sec (at about 0.5 MA). upper triangularity increased from 0.18 --> 0.27 on this shot. * * next shot * Increase Zcur from -0.01 --> 0.00 Decrease ZXU from 0.04 --> 0.02 |
| Dec 14 2010 10:16:57:637AM | 1101214007 | Steve Scott | Result: good EDA H-mode, steady PRF=3 MW. small injection at 1.25 sec.
disrupted again in rampdown at 1.7 sec. Kappa increased to about 1.6 on this shot. |
| Dec 14 2010 10:25:25:537AM | 1101214007 | Steve Scott | Result: good EDA H-mode, steady PRF=3 MW. small injection at 1.25 sec.
disrupted again in rampdown at 1.7 sec. Kappa increased to about 1.6 on this shot. NeL is still high at 1.6-1.7e20. * * next shot * 1. decrease NeL demand from 5.e19 to 4.e19 2. increase ZXU from 0.012 to 0.017 3. increase PRF to 4 MW |
| Dec 14 2010 10:41:18:967AM | 1101214008 | Steve Scott | Result: target NeL decreased slightly and NeL during RF decreased slightly as
well. good RF at 3--> 4 MW. disrupted in rampdown at 1.72 sec. No increase in Prad when RF power increases from 3 to 4 MW. * * This will be the "high-elongation" equilibrium. park it for later study. * * next shot * 1. Return ZCUR and ZXU to conditions of shot 5. 2. ZCUR set to -0.01. ZXU set to +0.08 3. Reduce RXL from -0.035 to -0.040 |
| Dec 14 2010 10:46:10:710AM | 1101214009 | Steve Scott | result: good EDA H-mode. disrupted in rampdown at 1.7 sec.
Nel still about 1.6-1,7e20, PRF = 3-4 MW, tauE = 1.5 x taue89. Achieved roughly desired shape. * * Next shot * 1. |
| Dec 14 2010 10:48:21:510AM | 1101214009 | Steve Scott | result: good EDA H-mode. disrupted in rampdown at 1.7 sec.
Nel still about 1.6-1,7e20, PRF = 3-4 MW, tauE = 1.5 x taue89. Achieved roughly desired shape. * * Next shot * 1. decrease ZCUR from -0.01 to -0.025 |
| Dec 14 2010 10:57:03:057AM | 1101214009 | Steve Scott | result: good EDA H-mode. disrupted in rampdown at 1.7 sec.
Nel still about 1.6-1,7e20, PRF = 3-4 MW, tauE = 1.5 x taue89. Achieved roughly desired shape. * * Problem: after the shot, all torus gate values closed due to pressure * excursion. there will be a delay while we investigate. * * Next shot * 1. Decrease ZCUR from -0.01 to -0.025 2. Add 1.0 MW of RF power from 1.5 to 1.7 sec (i.e. into rampdown) in an effort to eliminate the disruption during rampdown. |
| Dec 14 2010 11:12:34:650AM | 1101214010 | Steve Scott | Result: good plasma. A couple of ELMs and/or backtransitions.
Disruption delayed until circa 1.78 sec. * * Next shot * 1. |
| Dec 14 2010 11:19:02:880AM | 1101214010 | Steve Scott | Result: good plasma. A couple of ELMs and/or backtransitions.
I think the backtransitions are caused by faults in the RF power. Disruption delayed until circa 1.78 sec. * * Next shot * 1. disable H-bot and B-side lower 2. add another 100 ms to the RF in rampdown. 3. Decrease RXL by 5 mm, from -0.04 to -0.045 |
| Dec 14 2010 11:30:52:410AM | 1101214011 | Steve Scott | Result: disrupted at about 0.79 sec due to moly injection.
* * Next shot * 1. reduce early PRF to 2.0 MW, otherwise repeat of last shot |
| Dec 14 2010 11:45:49:190AM | 1101214012 | Steve Scott | result: full length shot - no disruption in rampdown.
lots of ELMs, resulting in a very ratty PRF waveform (1 to 2 MW). NeL remains at about 1.0e20. * * Next shot * 1. decrease NeL demand 4.0 --> 3.0e19 early, but then increase NeL demand to 8.0e19 from 0.9 to 1.5 sec. |
| Dec 14 2010 11:55:40:233AM | 1101214013 | Steve Scott | Result: full length shot. Better PRF waveform.
Some early ELMs, plus some impurity injections at 0.92 and circa 1.3 sec. * * Next shot * 1. decrease fill pressure in H-bot (neon) to 1.5 pounds 2. enable H-bot 3. increase demand on PG5 from 20 to 50 |
| Dec 14 2010 11:55:48:900AM | 1101214013 | Steve Scott | Result: full length shot. Better PRF waveform.
Some early ELMs, plus some impurity injections at 0.92 and circa 1.3 sec. * * Next shot * 1. decrease fill pressure in H-bot (neon) to 1.5 pounds 2. enable H-bot 3. increase demand on PG5 from 20 to 50 |
| Dec 14 2010 12:17:09:690PM | 1101214014 | Steve Scott | result: good shot, disrupted in rampdown at 1.78 sec.
No apparent ELMS. Two back transitions during RF ... maybe we put in too much neon? Good PRF waveform at 2-3 MW. Zeff=4 during RF * * Next shot * 1. reduce demand on Neon (PG5) from 50 to 20. |
| Dec 14 2010 12:44:42:960PM | 1101214015 | Steve Scott | Result: good shot, full length.
Moderate-sized injection @0.82 sec. Lots of ELMs. PRF waveform is pretty good, 2 --> 3 MW. Nel=1.3e20 and taue = 1.5 x Lmode Zeff about 3.6 * * Next shot * 1. turn off neon (H-bot). 2. reduce early PRF -- hopefully to avoid the early impurity injections. 3. adjust PRF waveform |
| Dec 14 2010 12:59:28:647PM | 1101214017 | Steve Scott | Result: full length shot. No major impurity injections (!) which Jerry
attributes to the small adjustment in the lower strike point. NeL = 1.2e20. PRF = 2 - 3 MW with a few dropouts when 3 MW is reached. * * Next shot: push up the elongation * 1. increase ZCUR -0.025 --> -0.010 (as on shot 009 today) 2. leave ZXU at 0.080 (as on shot 009 also) |
| Dec 14 2010 01:13:30:197PM | 1101214018 | Steve Scott | Result: full length shot with ELMs that please the SL. Prad under control
and no major impurity injections. NeL = 1.1. RF waveform is pretty ratty. EFIT says that the separatrix is just grazing the inner belt limitr at the bottom. * * Next shot * 1. Increase RXl from -0.050 to -0.045. 2. Tweak the RF parameters to reduce faulting. 3. reduce ZXL from 0.017 to 0.012 |
| Dec 14 2010 01:30:32:323PM | 1101214019 | Steve Scott | Result: full length plasma. Impurity injection at 0.89 sec.
NeL is higher than in previous shot ... maybe due to adjustment in position of lower X-point? Prad remains higher than in previous two shots. Pretty good PRF waveform, 2 --> 3 MW. * * Next shot: return to elongation on shot 8 * 1. ZCUR set to 0. 2. ZXU set to 0.02 |
| Dec 14 2010 01:40:27:650PM | 1101214020 | Steve Scott | Result: full length shot. No ELMs? or maybe small, grassy ELMs.
PRF = 2 --> 3 MW. * * Next shot: increase RXL by 0.5 cm. * |
| Dec 14 2010 01:41:35:173PM | 1101214020 | Steve Scott | Result: full length shot. No ELMs? or maybe small, grassy ELMs.
No obvious Prad spikes. PRF = 2 --> 3 MW. * * Next shot: increase RXL by 0.5 cm. * |
| Dec 14 2010 01:57:09:027PM | 1101214021 | Steve Scott | Result: full length plasma. Injection at 0.89 sec. no ELMs.
* * Next shot: decrease upper triangularity * 1. Increase RXU by 6 cm (!!). RXU = -0.015 --> +0.045 |
| Dec 14 2010 02:11:00:780PM | 1101214022 | Steve Scott | Result: full length plasma, but no ELMs. Confinement is almost L-mode at 1.0 sec;
is better earlier, when Prad is smaller. Late RF trip seems to cause a back transition. See a big reduction in upper triangularity (down to circa 0.2) compared to previous shot. * * Next shot * 1. Increase RF power. |
| Dec 14 2010 02:32:17:903PM | 1101214023 | Steve Scott | Result: plasma that disrupts at 1.48 sec. There is an early period
of good confinement and a late period of good confinement. Got to 4 MW of RF power late. There is a late impurity injection that seems to kill the late period of good confinement, but whether it is also the cause of the disruption is unclear. No ELMs. * * Next shot * 1. Increase ZXU from 0.02 to 0.05 2. Decrease ZCUR from 0.0 to -0.005 |
| Dec 14 2010 02:45:18:697PM | 1101214024 | Steve Scott | Result: plasma with ELMs. A brick, bowling ball etc. fell in at about
1.07 sec, leading to a disruption at 1.1 sec. * * Next shot * 1. Increase target NeL from 3.e19 to 4.e19 ... hopefully this will eliminate the fatal impurity injection without eliminating the ELMs. |
| Dec 14 2010 02:54:19:573PM | 1101214025 | Steve Scott | Result: full length plasma with ELMs. Target density rose a lot,
to 9.e19. Small injection at 1.03. RF waveform is ratty. * * Next shot * 1. Change NeL programming: reduce target NeL from 4.0e19 to 3.0e19 before 0.5 sec. after 0.5 sec, leave it unchanged from previous shot. |
| Dec 14 2010 03:06:24:397PM | 1101214026 | Steve Scott | Result: full length plasma with ELMs. A moderate-sized impurity injection
at about 1.03 sec. PRF to 4 MW. NeL is more like shot 24 - about 6.e19 before start of RF. * * Next shot * 1. |
| Dec 14 2010 03:08:34:393PM | 1101214026 | Steve Scott | Result: full length plasma with ELMs. A moderate-sized impurity injection
at about 1.03 sec. PRF to 4 MW. NeL is more like shot 24 - about 6.e19 before start of RF. * * Next shot * 1. Increase target NeL from 4.0 to 5.0e19 for t=0.5 to 1.0 sec. |
| Dec 14 2010 03:23:32:067PM | 1101214027 | Steve Scott | Result: plasma, disrupts at 1.6. The target NeL rises to 1.1e20 (compared
to demand of 5.e19) and the Halpha is 3-4x higher than in previous shot ... is there a Marfe or other detachment? RF waveform is ratty; little or no power from D-antenna. * * Next shot * 1. Decrease target NeL back to level of shot 26 (= 4.e19 for t=0.5 to 1.0 sec). 2. Bring RF power up faster. |
| Dec 14 2010 03:45:42:653PM | 1101214028 | Steve Scott | Result: plasma, but disrupts early at 1.05 sec. There is a big Prad burst
0.9-0.95 sec, maybe leading to locking and then a disruption. * * Next shot: reload shot 19 from today and raise its target NeL * from 3.e19 to 4.e19 between t=0.5 and t=1.0 sec. Also get the * PRF waveform from shot 19. |
| Dec 14 2010 03:54:11:737PM | 1101214029 | Steve Scott | Result: very nice shot, disrupts in rampdown at 1.75 sec.
Very well-behaved radiated power. Has nice ELMs. Late in RF, taue is 1.4 - 1.6 x Lmode. * * Next shot: start density scan in this configuration * 1. Increase target NeL from 4.0e19 to 5.0e19 over time t=0.5-1.0 sec. |
| Dec 14 2010 04:08:05:863PM | 1101214030 | Steve Scott | Result: very nice shot, similar to 29. full length.
Has Elms. Similar pedestal density, but some differences in time evolution of pedestal Te compared to shot 30. * * Next shot * |
| Dec 14 2010 04:15:38:307PM | 1101214030 | Steve Scott | Result: very nice shot, similar to 29. full length.
Has Elms. Similar pedestal density, but some differences in time evolution of pedestal Te compared to shot 30. * Transiently, taue reaches 1.8 x Lmode late in the shot, when PRF=3 MW. At the same time, tauE reaches about 1.1 x taue98(Hmode) * * Next shot: continue density scan at this configuration * 1. Increase target NeL from 5.e19 to 6.e19 for t=0.5-1.0 sec. |
| Dec 14 2010 04:30:31:413PM | 1101214031 | Steve Scott | Another nice full length shot with ELMs. transiently drops out
of Hmode at about 0.93 sec, maybe due to RF glitch. Target NeL is about 1.1e20, i.e. considerably larger than the demand of 6.e19. * * Next shot: reload from shot our favorite shot 29 and change RXU * 1. Decrease RXU -0.015 --> -0.065 , i.e. move it in 5 cm, in order to increase upper triangularity. |
| Dec 14 2010 04:48:05:110PM | 1101214032 | Steve Scott | Result: somewhat to the surprise of the physics operator, this shot
went through OK. Achieved the desired large increase in upper triangularity. Most plasma parameters similar to shot 29. Early in RF heating phase, this shot gets somewhat higher Wtot. * Has ELMs late. * * Next shot: reduce upper triangularity significantly * 1. Move RXU out by 10 cm (!!) from -0.065 to +0.035 |
| Dec 14 2010 04:58:11:470PM | 1101214033 | Steve Scott | result: plasma disrupted at 1.0 sec due to railing on EF2 upper.
* * Next shot * 1. reload shot 32 and reduce ZCUR from -0.01 to -0.02. |
| Dec 14 2010 05:06:26:393PM | 1101214034 | Steve Scott | Result: fizzle/dud. sigh.
* *************************************** * * end of run for today * * |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 08:51:35:313AM | Test | Ok | Gas test |
| 2 | 09:03:18:700AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 09:15:58:510AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 09:29:31:850AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 09:41:47:370AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 09:56:10:880AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 10:10:22:867AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 10:24:34:330AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 10:40:45:757AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 11:05:13:603AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 11:19:21:050AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 11:32:06:917AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 11:47:32:080AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 12:02:51:687PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 12:15:40:857PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 12:33:53:963PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 12:47:03:920PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 01:00:50:473PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 01:15:02:100PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 01:31:40:317PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 01:45:55:657PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 02:00:14:623PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 02:15:53:287PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 02:33:06:057PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 02:46:02:033PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 03:00:24:607PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 03:13:31:757PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 03:30:45:900PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 03:46:56:243PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 30 | 04:02:07:370PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 31 | 04:18:25:210PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 32 | 04:33:08:477PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 33 | 04:48:54:433PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 34 | 05:01:20:883PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| System Availability | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dec 14 2010 08:51:17:970AM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dec 14 2010 09:10:28:393AM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shutter was closed this shot
manually open it | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||