| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Istvan Cziegler,Jim Terry |
| Physics operator(s): | Robert Granetz,Steve Wukitch |
| Engineering operator(s): | Sam Pierson,Bill Parkin,Ed Fitzgerald |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| MP#635 Effects of RF heating on the edge/SOL poloidal velocities |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Jan 26 2011 12:12:13:383PM |
| Author: Istvan Cziegler |
| 1st 1/2 day
MP#635 Effects of RF heating on the edge/SOL poloidal velocities SL: Cziegler PO: Wukitch Gas Setup: fill NINJA plenum to 10 psi He Plan: USN RF L-modes -- start with 1100817016 I=0.8MA, but change B=5.4T (to compare best to ohmic 1091008 run) USN, no cryopump necessary, I-mode not required 0.130s long He gas puff at AB limiter for GPI; ICRF to scan from 1.0 MW input power to 3.5MW in 5 steps of 500kW If effect is reproduced at low RF power (up to 1.2MW - single antenna): ICRF power is increased during shot: 0 MW to 1.2MW, 0.2MW steps every 30ms; repeat 3 times with all antennas separately (D, E and J); repeat with a fine (0.1MW) power scan around critical values. If the previously observed effects are not clear at low power: increase power to the level where effect is developed -- this should take 6 good shots; outer gap is 0.7 mm for all shots first, repeat every shot with a 2cm gap -- this should take 6 good shots extra, for a total of 12 good shots in this half day. |
| Entered: Jan 27 2011 01:12:15:737PM |
| Author: Jim Terry |
| Run plan for 1110127 (2nd half of run)
SL: Jim Terry PO: Steve Wukitch applicable MP: 587a - this is a follow up to the 1100120 run Prep: Usual Overnight ECDC in D2 ------------------------------ ECDC Parameters ------------------------------ gas and pressure: D2 at 2e-4 Torr sweep: 44/45/103 cm scan: 20/120 s -- Working Gas Species: Deuterium -- ICRF needed for ~2 shots, therefore keep on standby -- Special gas puffing: 1psi Ar puff enabled, puff at 0.3s, 50ms in length 10psi He^4 NINJA puff enabled for GPI -- A-Coils: Standard configuration Desired Diagnostics and their setup: 1.) outboard midplane GPI (ADP array) - 2 MHz sample rate for 0.5 sec 2.) lower divertor flush-mounted probes at F port (digitized at 500 kHz) 3.) outboard midplane GPI (fast camera at 390 kfr/s digitized for 0.3 s) 4.) Edge TS 5.) ECE setup for 5.4 T Run plan: Toroidal Field: 3.6, 4.6, and 5.4 T see below Plasma Currents: 0.63 to 1.05 MA see below Working Gas Species: D2 Equilibrium configuration: LSN Here is a concise version of the run plan: load Shot 1100120023 - modify the Ip ramp slightly Bt (T) Ip (MA) NL04(e19) # of shots 3.6 .79-.71 4 2 3.6 .79-.71 9 2 4.6 1.01-.91 5 2 3.6 .70-.63 3 2 3.6 .70-.63 8 2 5.4 .76-.67 5 4 5.4 .76-.67 5 4 with RF 5.4 1.03-.93 5 2 ____________ We will examine the cross-correlation of outboard midplane GPI (APD array) signals with lower divertor probes at F-port with the mapping such that the fieldline connection length between GPI and divertor probes is ~3 m. These signals are correlated because the filaments/blobs dominate the fluctuations and because the filaments are field-aligned. PART 1: The plan is to establish the magnetic mapping such that the cross-correlation between I_sat of divertor probe 9 and the GPI intensity fluctuations are maximum in or near the center of the GPI view. After finding this mapping, then scan density, followed by a 2nd setting for field & current, while keeping q_95 the same (thus maintaining the mapping). In run 1100120 we showed that the desired magnetic mapping occurred (shot 1100120023) when q_95 was 3.10 (Ip=0.783 MA, Bt=3.6 T). (To see this, run map_div_probes_to_midGPI,1100120023, 1.09,1.11,Bphi_mult=0.925) Repeat these conditions to verify the good cross-correlation. Thus LOAD SHOT 1100120023, but with Ip programmed to peak at 0.790 MA at 0.75 s and then ramp it down to 0.710 MA in 0.45 s (i.e. reaching 0.710 MA at 1.2 s). Note NL04 for the target is 4e19 cm-2. Some adjustment of the outer gap may be necessary. Repeat shot with higher density (NL04=9e19 cm-2). NOTE - it is important to keep the outer strike-point the same as in shot 1100120023 for all of the following Ip & Bt changes. 2 shots Return to lower density (NL04=5e19 cm-2) but raise Bt to 4.6 T and Ip to 1.01 MA at peak and 0.907 at ramp end, keeping q const. 2 shots ____________ end of PART 1 - ~6 shots PART 2 Now map div. probe 10 to the APD array view: This occurs at a q_95 that is ~1.13 of the q for which probe 9 has maximum cross-correlation. Thus I expect that probe 10 maps for the Ip ramp from 0.70 MA to 0.63 MA. (to see this, run map_div_probes_to_midGPI,1100120023, 1.09,1.11,Bphi_mult=1.13*.925 and note that this implies a nominal q of 3.1*1.13 or Ip=0.783/1.13 at 3.6 T. Take 2 shots at Bt=3.6 T with an Ip ramp from 0.70 MA at 0.75 s to 0.63 MA at 1.2 s - NL04~3xe19 cm-2 If good cross-cor is seen, then repeat at higher density, NL04~8e19 cm-2 ____________ end of PART 2 - ~4 shots PART 3 Now map div. probe 8 to the APD array view: This cannot be done in one half of a toriodal circuit at an accessible q. A mapping occurs after 1.5 circuits at a q_95 that is 1.70 of the q for which probe 9 has maximum cross-correlation. Thus I expect that probe 8 maps at 5.4 T for the Ip ramp from 0.76 MA to 0.67 MA. (to see this, run map_div_probes_to_midGPI,1100120023, 1.09,1.11,Bphi_mult=1.70*0.925 and note that this implies a nominal q of 3.1*1.70 or Ip=0.783/1.58 at 3.6 T or Ip=0.783/1.58*(5.4/3.6)= 0.740 MA at 5.4 T Take 2 shots at Bt=5.40 T with an Ip ramp from 0.76 MA at 0.75 s to 0.67 MA at 1.2 s - NL04~4xe19 cm-2 If good cross-cor is seen, then repeat at higher density, NL04~8e19 cm-2. If good cross-cor is seen, then repeat adding 2.5 MW of ICRF in order to produce an EDA H-mode. See if this perturbs the mapping as implied by Linda Sugiyama's Ideas Form presentation. ____________ end of PART 3 - ~8 shots PART 4 (if time allows) If good cross-cor is seen with probe 8, then attempt to map probe 7 after 1.5 toroidal circuits. This is predicted to occur at (to see this, run map_div_probes_to_midGPI,1100120023, 1.09,1.11,Bphi_mult=1.20) and note that this implies a nominal q of 3.1*1.20 or Ip=0.783/1.20 at 3.6 T or Ip=0.783/1.20*(5.4/3.6)= 0.98 MA at 5.4 T) Thus take 2 shots at Bt=5.40 T with an Ip ramp from 1.03 MA at 0.75 s to 0.93 MA at 1.2 s - NL04~5xe19 cm-2 Code that are needed: .r /home/terry/kn1d/map_div_probes_to_midGPI.pro map_div_probes_to_midGPI,shot_num, start_time, stop_time and .r /home/terry/kn1d/show_fieldlines_from_div_to_GPI.pro show_fieldlines_from_div_to_GPI,shot_num,time To analyze the cross-correlation between a give divertor probe and the APD signals, use /home/terry/gpi/APDs/correlate_apd2probe.pro correlate_apd2probe,1100120014,t_in=0.73,t_out=1.195,probe=3,/plotit or correlate_apd2probe,1100120014,t_in=0.73,t_out=1.195,probe=3,/png where the probe # is 1 EDGE::top.probes.fmp.osd_10.p0:I_Slow 2 EDGE::top.probes.fmp.osd_10.p2:V_Slow 3 EDGE::top.probes.fmp.osd_09.p0:I_Slow 4 EDGE::top.probes.fmp.osd_09.p2:V_Slow 5 EDGE::top.probes.fmp.osd_08.p0:I_Slow 6 EDGE::top.probes.fmp.osd_08.p2:V_Slow 7 EDGE::top.probes.fmp.osd_07.p0:I_Slow 8 EDGE::top.probes.fmp.osd_07.p2:V_Slow 9 EDGE::top.probes.fmp.osd_06.p0:I_Slow 10 EDGE::top.probes.fmp.osd_06.p2:V_Slow |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Entered: Jan 26 2011 04:26:48:807PM |
| Author: Steve Wukitch |
| Session Leader: Istvan Cziegler (1st half)/Jim Terry (2nd half)
Physics Operator: Steve Wukitch MP635: Effects of RF heating on the edge/SOL poloidal velocities MP587a: The Parallel Structure and Dynamics of Blob/Filaments ----------------- Engineering Setup ----------------- Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 14:00 Power systems as on: 1100817016 Acoil: +Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot (standard) Hybrid Enabled Gas setup: Fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar Hybrid DISABLED (PG1) leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) fill B-main (C-side) with 40 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3) fill NINJA with 10 psi D2 DISABLED Enable gate-valves and shutters: ECE, VUV, HiREX Sr, Xeus Leave z-bolo shutter as is (should be open) Torvac gatevalve toggle (yes/no): no Boronization(yes/no): no Overnight ECDC (yes/no): yes ICRF(yes/no): yes LH(yes/no): no Cryopump (yes/no): no DNB (yes/no): no Vessel temperature: 50/50/50 ------------------------------ ECDC Parameters (if requested) ------------------------------ gas and pressure: D2 at 2e-4 Torr sweep: 44/45/103 cm scan: 20/120 s PO Plan 1) Start with USN discharges based on 1100817016 with BT set to 5.4 T; account for no cryopump on startup by shortening the prepuff to 25 ms from 55 ms. 2) For second half, load LSN discharge based on 1100120023 |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jan 30 2011 09:03:27:410PM |
| Author: Istvan Cziegler |
| This half run day was dedicated to MP#635
"Effects of RF heating on the edge/SOL poloidal velocities" In this half day which constituted the first half of the MP we wanted to reproduce all of the previously observed RF-heating phenomena in the SOL and tie these phenomena to specific operating parameters before we could perform a systematic scan of major plasma parameters - like Ip, Bt and ne. The run was very successful. We produced 14 good shots, and tested all RF antenna-combinations at all the relevant heating powers. The strong negative radial electric field developing in the far SOL, near or right in front ofthe antennas was observed with all individual antennas (E,D and J). The critical heating power at which this phenomenon becomes clearly discernible by GPI is around 600kW for all antennas in the most typical 5.4T, 0.8MA, nl04=0.8-0.9e20m^-2 plasmas. This treshold will be investigated in the second half of the MP. The radial profile of this electric field is different for each antenna. Whether this is depends on how well the region in front of the antenna is connected magnetically to the A-B limiter, where GPI measurements are made, will be addressed in the second half of MP#635. The previously rarely observed flow striation (EDD-IDD-EDD-IDD from the wall towards the core) was produced most clearly with antennas D+J at a minimum power of 800kW. A similar effect is seen with E+J and another, weaker phenomenon with only J producing the same amount of power. The size of the OUTER GAP seems to have a strong effect on the above striation pattern, which I provisionally attributed to the strong positive radial electric field in the near SOL region, previously measured by scanning probes. |
| Entered: Feb 9 2011 05:21:24:023PM |
| Author: Jim Terry |
| Summary for the 2nd half of run 1110127.
This was a continuation of MP 587a, where we are investigating the parallel structure and dynamics of the SOL filaments. We were successful in finding good cross-correlations between divertor probe (I_sat) signals and the intensity fluctuations in the 2D outboard midplane GPI view. The good cross-correlations were established for divertor probe 9 (X-corr ~ 0.6) and probe 10 (X-corr~0.75). The EFIT mapped-to-miplane rhos for these probes were typically 10 mm outside the rho of the array location where the maximum in the cross-correlation. Also the mapping in Z was not as predicted by EFIT; a reduction of Bt by 0.95 (or an increase of Bp by 1.05 gives the best mapping of EFIT to the location of the max correlation. These are cross-correlations using filaments connected by fieldlines mapping through ~0.5 toroidal turn. We were not able to find a good cross-correlation between probe 8 and the midplane after 1.5 toroidal turns.) Divertor probe 8 maps to a midplane rho of ~ 5 mm Divertor probe 9 maps to a midplane rho of ~ 9 mm Divertor probe 10 maps to a midplane rho of ~11 mm Delay times (between probe and miplane) were shorter at higher field and current by ~5 usec. Shot 030 has an Ohmic H-mode from 0.75-0.898 s with small ELM bursts starting at 0.826 s. The ELMs have a growing 200 kHz precursor oscillation. There is also a good QCM mode during that time; it has a 13 km/s EDD poloidal velocity! The detailed shot summary is: [shot] [Ip range for good X-corr] [Bt] [gap] [X-corr] [Bt mult. assuming field-aligned] [delta R] 016 0.788-0.76 3.6 0.55 1.4 0.953 +8mm probe 9 017 0.791-0.757 3.6 0.55 1.15 0.97 +9mm probe 9 018 0.790-0.758 3.6 0.55 0.9 0.96 +8mm probe 9 019 1.013-0.99 4.63 0.50 0.9 0.949 +10mm probe 9 020 1.02-0.986 4.63 0.50 0.85 0.947 +10mm probe 9 021 0.703-0.680 3.6 0.60 0.9 0.958 +8-10mm probe 10 022 no mapping to probe 10 over Ip range 0.655-0.555 MA 023 disrupted before puff 024 0.730-0.720 3.6 0.75 1.7-1.3 0.958 +10-12mm probe 10 025 0.730-0.685 3.6 0.67 1.2 0.958 +10 mm probe 10 026 0.725-0.678 3.6 0.62 0.9 0.958 +10 mm probe 10 027 no mapping to probe 8 over Ip range 0.784-0.691 MA, Bt=5.45 T (gap=0.5) it should have occurred at 1.01-1.05 s (Ip=0.73-0.718) 028 no mapping to probe 8 over Ip range 0.780-0.690 MA (gap=0.9) 029 0.714-0.678 3.6 0.70 1.25-1.4 0.955 +10 mm probe 10 higher ne than 024 030 0.715-0.690 3.6 0.70 0.6-1 0.941 +10 mm probe 10 Note that delta R is the difference in major radius for where the EFIT mapping shows the probe's field line maps onto the array MINUS the radius of max. correlation, i.e EFIT predicts the probe maps to a larger rho than observed via the max cross-correlation. At face value that means that the filament at the diverter is radially outboard of the fieldline it is on at the midplane. For this run we had Josh's/Bill Burke's CPCI timing system working. To automatically put the timing-system-derived timebases in the tree and tie them to the appropriate digitizers, we added special nodes in the EDGE and SPECTROSCOPY trees under the appropriate digitizer nodes. for the APD digitizers the corrected timebases are stored in the nodes SPECTROSCOPY::TOP.GPI.APD_ARRAY.HARDWARE:DT132_1:T_SIG_BASE SPECTROSCOPY::TOP.GPI.APD_ARRAY.HARDWARE:DT132_2:T_SIG_BASE SPECTROSCOPY::TOP.GPI.APD_ARRAY.HARDWARE:DT132_3:T_SIG_BASE The F-port divertor probe signals are stored using digitizer EDGE::TOP.PROBES.CPCI_FPORT:DT196_01 for this run this digitizer did NOT have the timing signal. Rather digitizer EDGE::TOP.PROBES.CPCI_FPORT:DT196_02 had the timing signal. On run 1110131 Brian proved to himself that DT196_01 and DT196_02 had the same timebase. Thus the timebase for the signals read by DT196_01 should be read by getting the corrected timebase for DT196_02, i.e. node EDGE::TOP.PROBES.CPCI_FPORT:DT196_02:T_SIG_BASE This has been corrected for future runs, in which case each digitizer will have its own corrected timebase. Also in the future, if timing signal is not present for some reason, then this corrected-timebase-node EDGE::TOP.PROBES.CPCI_FPORT:DT196_01:T_SIG_BASE will default to the internal timebase on the digitizer and the node EDGE::TOP.PROBES.CPCI_FPORT:DT196_01:T_SIG_SOURCE will be set to 0. If the node is using the timing signal, then EDGE::TOP.PROBES.CPCI_FPORT:DT196_01:T_SIG_SOURCE will be set to 1. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Jan 27 2011 05:07:12:100PM |
| Author: Steve Wukitch |
| We had an hour delay due to the snow storm. We started with MP635 to
investigate impact of ICRF power and antenna mapping to the GPI view on the measured poloidal velocities. There was some vertical instability for discharges with ~1.8 cm outer gap addressed by lowering ZXU. We verified earlier observations and were able to scan power, active antennas, and right gap. We moved to MP587a and were able to switch without significant problems. We had a rough stretch with disruptions in 23 and 24 that was addressed by raising density. Otherwise it was much tweaking of gaps, density, currents and magnetic fields. Score Card plasmas: 30 disruptions: 4 early disruptions (<0.5 s): fizzles: runaway shutdown: 1 |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Jan 27 2011 10:16:57:700AM | 1110127001 | Istvan Cziegler | Ip=0.8MA
Bt=5.4T nl04=1e20m^-2 OUTER_GAP=2cm shot disrupted at t=1.4s He puff hits at t=1.1s (starting puff 0.1s earllier on the next one) Signals are good on all APD's, no saturation. RF was lower than expected, repeat to get the required values. EDD propagation in the far SOL is seen for P_ICRF=1.0MW already. First column (farthest into SOL) has a fast IDD feature. Behind antenna? Nominal R_major=91.1cm Antenna R_major=91.3cm |
| Jan 27 2011 10:42:08:577AM | 1110127002 | Istvan Cziegler | Full length shot.
nl04=0.95e20m^-2 OUTER_GAP=1.8cm He puff hits at t=1.03s (starting puff 0.02s earllier on the next one) Signals are good on all APD's, no saturation. RF OK, some trips at the highest power. EDD propagation in the far SOL is seen for P_ICRF=1.0MW already. First column (farthest into SOL) has a fast IDD feature. Starting at v=2.3km/s (IDD) second column starting at v=2.5km/s (EDD) which would indicate the same potential drop scale length (if it's the two faces of the antenna) P_ICRF=2.5MW 1st col - EDD 2nd col - IDD 3rd col - EDD |
| Jan 27 2011 10:36:22:103AM | 1110127003 | Istvan Cziegler | Disrupted at t=0.76s
No light on APD's. |
| Jan 27 2011 11:12:30:313AM | 1110127004 | Istvan Cziegler | Full length shot.
nl04=1.2e20m^-2 (during RF) OUTER_GAP=1.1cm He puff hits before 1.0s (move it a tad later) Signals are good on all APD's, no saturation. P=1MW col1 - v=-1.15km/s col2 - v=2.1km/s then more or less regular L-mode P=1.7MW col1 - v=-1.14km/s col2 - v=1.9km/s then reg L-mode no power shows the EDD-IDD-EDD effect with a small gap! The velocity of the EDD feature in the edge depends on RF. Starting single antenna experiments. |
| Jan 27 2011 11:32:54:520AM | 1110127005 | Istvan Cziegler | Full length shot.
RF: 0-1.2MW from D nl04=0.85e20m^-2 (during RF) OUTER_GAP=0.8-1.0cm He puff hits at 1.0s (perfect) Signals are good on all APD's, no saturation. P=0.2MW col1 - v=-940m/s col2 - v=-1060m/s -- and v=1340m/s in EDD (weak) then reg L-mode P=0.4MW col1 - v=-980m/s col2 - v=-1200m/s -- and v=1500m/s in EDD (weak) then reg L-mode P=0.6MW col1 - dominantly EDD: v=3.1km/s rest reg L-mode The effect gets stronger from here. Next shot: repeat with a 2cm gap. |
| Jan 27 2011 11:40:47:250AM | 1110127006 | Istvan Cziegler | Full length shot.
RF: 0-1.2MW from D nl04=0.85e20m^-2 (during RF) OUTER_GAP=1.8-2.0cm He puff hits at 1.03s (bring it 30ms earlier) Signals are good on all APD's, no saturation. In previous ones the EDD propagation becomes dominant at: P=0.6MW col1 - strong EDD: v=6.9km/s decays within 3 channels (~1.1cm) rest reg L-mode Next shot: repeat with the same power from E, but ramp RF down at 1.35s to reduce MARFE |
| Jan 27 2011 11:55:19:940AM | 1110127007 | Istvan Cziegler | Full length shot.
RF: 0-1.2MW from nl04=0.83e20m^-2 (during RF) OUTER_GAP=1.8-2.0cm He puff hits at 0.97s (bring it 30ms earlier) Signals are good on all APD's, no saturation. In previous ones the EDD propagation becomes dominant at: P=0.6MW col1 - strong EDD: v=2.8km/s decays within 2 channels (~.8cm) rest reg L-mode Next shot: repeat with small outer gap |
| Jan 27 2011 12:07:41:150PM | 1110127008 | Istvan Cziegler | Full length shot.
RF: 0-1.2MW from nl04=0.77e20m^-2 (during RF) OUTER_GAP=1.0cm He puff hits at 0.97s Signals are good on all APD's, no saturation. In previous ones the EDD propagation becomes dominant at: P=0.6MW col1 - very weak EDD: v=1.3km/s col2 - weak but stronger EDD, same velocity rest L-mode except for fast IDD feature close to LCFS Next shot: repeat with J (both sides, so double the power) |
| Jan 27 2011 12:19:41:387PM | 1110127009 | Istvan Cziegler | Early shutdown.
No data. |
| Jan 27 2011 12:49:19:223PM | 1110127010 | Istvan Cziegler | Full length shot.
RF: 0-2.2MW from J nl04=0.9-1.0e20m^-2 (during RF) OUTER_GAP=0.9cm He puff hits at 0.97s Signals are good on all APD's, no saturation. In previous ones the EDD propagation becomes dominant at: P=0.6MW so at P=0.8MW: col1 - weak EDD: v=1.7km/s, IDD: v=-1.4km/s col2 - dominant EDD (large v spread) v=3.0km/s rest L-mode except for fast IDD feature close to LCFS P=2.2MW col1 both EDD (v=2.6km/s) and IDD (v=-2.1km/s) present col2 EDD dominant (v=3.km/s) Next shot: repeat with 2cm outer gap |
| Jan 27 2011 12:48:47:090PM | 1110127011 | Istvan Cziegler | Full length shot.
RF: 0-2.2MW from J nl04=0.85-0.98e20m^-2 (during RF) OUTER_GAP=1.8-2.0cm He puff hits at 0.97s Signals are good on all APD's, no saturation. In previous ones the EDD propagation becomes dominant at P=0.6MW so at P=1.2MW (higher than that limit) col1-2 strong, fast IDD col3 EDD (!!) switches back in ~2channels but this is reproduced even with 0.4MW of power. The OUTER GAP is key! Is this due to positive E_r just outside the LCFS due to temperature gradient? Next shot: repeat with E+D providing the power instead of J |
| Jan 27 2011 01:04:59:727PM | 1110127012 | Istvan Cziegler | Full length shot.
RF: 0-2.2MW from D+E nl04=0.77-1.0e20m^-2 (during RF) OUTER_GAP=1.8-2.0cm He puff hits at 0.97s Signals are good on all APD's, no saturation. In previous ones the EDD propagation becomes dominant at P=0.6MW so at 0.8MW (higher than that limit) col1 - strong, fast (v=6.0km/s) EDD feature decays in 2 channels (~8mm) rest is L-mode at max power col1 strong, extra sharp EDD (v=7.7km/s) the same radial profile as with 400kW Next shot: repeat with small gap |
| Jan 27 2011 01:16:29:010PM | 1110127013 | Istvan Cziegler | Full length shot.
RF: 0-2.2MW from D+E nl04=0.7-1.0e20m^-2 (during RF) OUTER_GAP=0.9cm He puff hits at 0.97s Signals are good on all APD's, no saturation. In previous ones the EDD propagation becomes dominant at P=0.6MW so at 0.8MW (higher than that limit) col1 - VERY weak EDD (v=1.5km/s) falls off within ~8mm the rest is L-mode with a fast IDD feature at LCFS (this structure is unaffected by power) Next shot: repeat with large gap and power provided by D+J (1-to-1) |
| Jan 27 2011 01:30:46:590PM | 1110127014 | Istvan Cziegler | Full length shot.
RF: 0-2.4MW from D+J nl04=0.7-1.0e20m^-2 (during RF) OUTER_GAP=2.0cm He puff hits at 0.97s Signals are good on all APD's, no saturation. In previous ones the EDD propagation becomes dominant at P=0.6MW so at 0.9MW (higher than that limit) col1 - strong, sharp EDD (v=3.4km/s) col2 - strong, sharp, fast IDD (v=-3.3km/s) col3 - switch over col4 - strong, sharp EDD (v=4.2km/s) decays over 4 columns (~1.5cm) Next shot: repeat with power provided by E+J (1-to-1) |
| Jan 27 2011 01:46:48:423PM | 1110127015 | Istvan Cziegler | Full length shot.
RF: 0-2.4MW from E+J nl04=0.7-1.0e20m^-2 (during RF) OUTER_GAP=1.9-2.0cm He puff hits at 0.97s Signals are good on all APD's, no saturation. In previous ones the EDD propagation becomes dominant at P=0.6MW so at 0.85MW (higher than that limit) col1 - strong, sharp IDD (v=-2.5km/s) (weak EDD at v=5.5km/s) col2 - strong, sharp IDD (v=-3.km/s) col3 - switch over col4 - strong, sharp EDD (v=4.2km/s) decays over 4 columns (~1.5cm) Thank you all for the successful half-run! |
| Jan 28 2011 10:48:16:423AM | 1110127016 | Jim Terry | Set up for magnetic mapping of filaments between outboard
midplane GPI and divertor probe 9. This should occur at Bt=3.6 T, Ip=0.780 MA. Outer gap is 1.4 cm NINJA puus at 0.63 s and 0.88 s Phantom timing start at 0.95 s APD timings set to 0.75 to 1.20 s Good shot - just as programmed good max correlation moves off of array at 0.95 s
max cor=0.51 at t=0.838 with R,Z=88.39,-3.00 repeat but with smaller outer gap (-> 0.8 cm) and smaller ramp rate (Ip at 0.75 MA at 1.2 s). |
| Jan 28 2011 10:52:59:703AM | 1110127017 | Jim Terry | Set up for magnetic mapping of filaments between outboard
midplane GPI and divertor probe 9. This should occur at Bt=3.6 T, Ip=0.780 MA. Outer gap is 1.1 cm NINJA puus at 0.63 s and 0.88 s Phantom timing start at 0.95 s APD timings set to 0.75 to 1.20 s great shot - just as programmed Ip ramped from 0.79 to 0.74 MA good max correlation moves thru array and then off of array at 1.08 s
max cor=0.60 at t=0.831 found at R,Z=88.77,-2.64 repeat but with smaller outer gap (-> 0.8 cm), same ramp |
| Jan 28 2011 11:02:40:590AM | 1110127018 | Jim Terry | Set up for magnetic mapping of filaments between outboard
midplane GPI and divertor probe 9. This should occur at Bt=3.6 T, Ip=0.780 MA. Outer gap is now 0.9 cm NINJA puus at 0.63 s and 0.88 s Phantom timing start at 0.95 s APD timings set to 0.75 to 1.20 s great shot - just as programmed Ip ramped from 0.79 to 0.74 MA good max correlation moves thru array and then off of array at 1.08 s
max cor=0.58 at t=0.838 with R,Z=89.53,-2.24 Next shot: increase Ip and Bt (to 4.6 T) at const q |
| Jan 28 2011 11:08:02:813AM | 1110127019 | Jim Terry | Set up for magnetic mapping of filaments between outboard
midplane GPI and divertor probe 9. This should occur at Bt=4.63 T, Ip=0.990 MA. Outer gap is now 0.9 cm NINJA puus at 0.63 s and 0.88 s Phantom timing start at 0.95 s APD timings set to 0.75 to 1.20 s great shot - just as programmed Ip ramped from 1.02 to 0.95 MA good max correlation moves thru array, disturbed by injection at 0.95 s
max cor=0.55 at t=0.825 with R,Z=89.15,-3.00 max cor=0.55 at t=0.831 with R,Z=89.15,-2.61 max cor=0.54 at t=0.838 with R,Z=89.15,-3.00 Next shot: slightly higher Ip |
| Jan 28 2011 11:20:15:840AM | 1110127020 | Jim Terry | Set up for magnetic mapping of filaments between outboard
midplane GPI and divertor probe 9. This should occur at Bt=4.63 T, Ip=0.990 MA. Outer gap is 0.9 cm NINJA puus at 0.63 s and 0.88 s Phantom timing start at 0.95 s APD timings set to 0.75 to 1.20 s good shot - Ip ramped from 1.02 to 0.97 MA no obvious change in the mapping at these higher fields and currents. good max correlation moves thru array and then off of array at 1.06 s
max cor=0.49 at t=0.953 with R,Z=89.15,-4.14 max cor=0.55 at t=0.959 with R,Z=89.15,-4.14 max cor=0.41 at t=0.966 with R,Z=89.15,-4.14 max cor=0.53 at t=0.980 with R,Z=89.15,-4.14 max cor=0.62 at t=0.982 with R,Z=89.15,-4.14 Next shot: try to map probe 10, which means going back to 3.6 T and an Ip ramp from 0.70 to 0.63 MA |
| Jan 28 2011 01:47:08:410PM | 1110127021 | Jim Terry | Set up for magnetic mapping of filaments between outboard
midplane GPI and divertor probe 10. This should occur at Bt=3.6 T, Ip=0.680 MA. Outer gap is 0.9 cm NINJA puus at 0.63 s and 0.88 s Phantom timing start at 0.95 s APD timings set to 0.75 to 1.20 s good shot, but mapping is not right - Ip ramped from 0.70 to 0.63 MA max correlation is < 0.2
max cor=0.53 at t=0.786 with R,Z=89.92,-3.00 max cor=0.62 at t=0.792 with R,Z=89.92,-3.00 max cor=0.52 at t=0.799 with R,Z=89.53,-3.38 max cor=0.54 at t=0.805 with R,Z=89.53,-3.38 max cor=0.51 at t=0.812 with R,Z=89.53,-3.00 max cor=0.62 at t=0.818 with R,Z=89.53,-3.38 max cor=0.59 at t=0.825 with R,Z=89.53,-3.76 max cor=0.66 at t=0.831 with R,Z=89.53,-3.76 max cor=0.63 at t=0.838 with R,Z=89.53,-3.76 Next shot: reduce Ip ramp from 0.65 to 0.55 MA |
| Jan 28 2011 01:49:16:217PM | 1110127022 | Jim Terry | Set up for magnetic mapping of filaments between outboard
midplane GPI and divertor probe 10. This should occur at Bt=3.6 T, Ip=0.680 MA. Outer gap is 0.9 cm NINJA puffs at 0.63 s and 0.88 s Phantom timing start at 0.95 s APD timings set to 0.75 to 1.20 s good shot, but mapping is not right - Ip ramped from 0.66 to 0.55 MA max correlation is < 0.3
Next shot: increase gap to 1.3 cm, and go back to nominal mapping-Ip-ramp from 0.66 to 0.56 MA |
| Jan 28 2011 01:58:50:103PM | 1110127024 | Jim Terry | Set up for magnetic mapping of filaments between outboard
midplane GPI and divertor probe 10. This should occur at Bt=3.6 T, Ip=0.680 MA. Outer gap is 1.4 cm NINJA puffs at 0.63 s and 0.88 s Phantom timing start at 0.95 s APD timings set to 0.75 to 1.20 s disrupting shot - maps to top of array - Ip ramped from 0.73 to 0.72 MA before it disrupts max correlation is >0.7
max cor=0.68 at t=0.759 with R,Z=88.77,-1.11 max cor=0.69 at t=0.766 with R,Z=88.77,-1.11 max cor=0.73 at t=0.772 with R,Z=88.77,-1.11 max cor=0.74 at t=0.779 with R,Z=88.77,-1.11 max cor=0.72 at t=0.785 with R,Z=88.77,-1.11 max cor=0.76 at t=0.790 with R,Z=89.15,-1.08 max cor=0.81 at t=0.796 with R,Z=88.76,-1.89 max cor=0.73 at t=0.801 with R,Z=88.76,-1.89 max cor=0.81 at t=0.807 with R,Z=88.76,-1.89 Next shot: Ip-ramp from 0.76 to 0.66 MA |
| Jan 28 2011 02:15:35:953PM | 1110127025 | Jim Terry | Set up for magnetic mapping of filaments between outboard
midplane GPI and divertor probe 10. This should occur at Bt=3.6 T, Ip=0.680 MA. Outer gap is 1.13 cm NINJA puffs at 0.602 s and 0.88 s Phantom timing start at 0.95 s APD timings set to 0.75 to 1.20 s good shot - great mapping - Ip ramped from 0.73 to 0.63 MA max correlation is >0.6
max cor=0.69 at t=0.917 with R,Z=88.77,-2.27 max cor=0.69 at t=0.923 with R,Z=88.77,-2.27 max cor=0.68 at t=0.930 with R,Z=88.77,-2.27 max cor=0.63 at t=0.936 with R,Z=88.76,-1.89 max cor=0.68 at t=0.943 with R,Z=88.77,-2.64 max cor=0.72 at t=0.948 with R,Z=88.77,-2.27 max cor=0.74 at t=0.953 with R,Z=88.77,-2.27 max cor=0.70 at t=0.958 with R,Z=88.77,-2.64 Next shot: reduce gap to 0.8 |
| Jan 28 2011 02:24:38:407PM | 1110127026 | Jim Terry | Set up for magnetic mapping of filaments between outboard
midplane GPI and divertor probe 10. This should occur at Bt=3.6 T, Ip=0.680 MA. Outer gap is 0.8 cm NINJA puffs at 0.602 s and 0.88 s Phantom timing start at 0.95 s APD timings set to 0.75 to 1.20 s good shot - great mapping - Ip ramped from 0.73 to 0.63 MA max cor moves down the array, off around 1.0 s It has movesd in as well because of the smaller gap. max correlation is >0.6
max cor=0.61 at t=0.838 with R,Z=89.53,-1.08 max cor=0.66 at t=0.845 with R,Z=89.53,-1.08 max cor=0.62 at t=0.851 with R,Z=89.53,-1.08 max cor=0.64 at t=0.858 with R,Z=89.53,-1.47 max cor=0.60 at t=0.864 with R,Z=89.53,-1.47 max cor=0.62 at t=0.871 with R,Z=89.92,-1.08 max cor=0.68 at t=0.877 with R,Z=89.53,-1.47 max cor=0.66 at t=0.881 with R,Z=89.53,-1.47 Next shot: try to map probe 8 with 1.5 circuits, i.e Bt=5.4 T and Ip from 0.77 to 0.67 MA |
| Jan 27 2011 04:36:07:850PM | 1110127027 | Jim Terry | Set up for magnetic mapping of filaments between outboard
midplane GPI and divertor probe 8. This should occur at Bt=5.4 T, Ip=0.740 MA. Outer gap is 0.8 cm NINJA puffs at 0.602 s and 0.88 s Phantom timing start at 0.95 s APD timings set to 0.75 to 1.20 s good shot - no correlation > 0.2
Next shot: increase the gap to 1.4 cm |
| Jan 27 2011 04:46:43:510PM | 1110127028 | Jim Terry | Set up for magnetic mapping of filaments between outboard
midplane GPI and divertor probe 8. This should occur at Bt=5.4 T, Ip=0.740 MA. Outer gap is 0.8 cm NINJA puffs at 0.602 s and 0.88 s Phantom timing start at 0.95 s APD timings set to 0.75 to 1.20 s good shot - no correlation > 0.2
Next shot: reload shot 25 which had good correlation with probe 10, but raise the density with a ramp from NL04=0.6 to 1e20 |
| Jun 8 2011 02:09:59:897PM | 1110127029 | Jim Terry | Set up for magnetic mapping of filaments between outboard
midplane GPI and divertor probe 10. This should occur at Bt=3.6 T, Ip=0.705 MA. Outer gap is ~1.3 cm - changing NINJA puffs at 0.602 s and 0.88 s Phantom timing start at 0.95 s APD timings set to 0.75 to 1.20 s good shot - good max correlations during Ip ramp Note increase in max correlation from t=0.75 to 0.86 s
max cor=0.75 at t=0.949 with R,Z=88.77,-2.64 max cor=0.76 at t=0.951 with R,Z=88.77,-2.64 max cor=0.74 at t=0.953 with R,Z=88.77,-2.64 max cor=0.72 at t=0.955 with R,Z=88.77,-2.64 max cor=0.72 at t=0.957 with R,Z=88.77,-2.64 max cor=0.64 at t=0.959 with R,Z=88.77,-2.64 max cor=0.72 at t=0.961 with R,Z=88.77,-2.64 max cor=0.83 at t=0.964 with R,Z=88.77,-2.64 max cor=0.78 at t=0.966 with R,Z=88.77,-2.64 max cor=0.75 at t=0.968 with R,Z=88.77,-2.64 max cor=0.80 at t=0.970 with R,Z=88.77,-2.64 max cor=0.73 at t=0.972 with R,Z=88.77,-3.03 max cor=0.74 at t=0.974 with R,Z=88.77,-3.03 max cor=0.81 at t=0.976 with R,Z=88.77,-3.03 max cor=0.81 at t=0.980 with R,Z=88.77,-3.03 max cor=0.76 at t=0.982 with R,Z=88.77,-3.03 max cor=0.80 at t=0.984 with R,Z=88.77,-2.64 max cor=0.73 at t=0.986 with R,Z=88.77,-3.03 max cor=0.73 at t=0.988 with R,Z=88.77,-3.03 max cor=0.79 at t=0.990 with R,Z=88.77,-3.03 max cor=0.76 at t=0.992 with R,Z=88.77,-3.41 max cor=0.76 at t=0.994 with R,Z=88.77,-3.41 max cor=0.77 at t=0.996 with R,Z=88.77,-3.41 max cor=0.75 at t=0.998 with R,Z=88.77,-3.41 max cor=0.68 at t=1.000 with R,Z=88.77,-3.03 max cor=0.71 at t=1.002 with R,Z=88.39,-3.38 max cor=0.72 at t=1.005 with R,Z=88.77,-3.41 max cor=0.77 at t=1.007 with R,Z=88.77,-3.78 Next shot: keep the density ramp but hold the current constant so that the max correlation is in the middle of the array |
| Jun 8 2011 03:33:42:360PM | 1110127030 | Jim Terry | Set up for magnetic mapping of filaments between outboard
midplane GPI and divertor probe 10. This should occur at Bt=3.6 T, Ip=0.705 MA. Outer gap is ~1.3 cm - changing NINJA puffs at 0.602 s and 0.88 s Phantom timing start at 0.95 s APD timings set to 0.75 to 1.20 s good shot, but short Ohmic H-mode at 0.75-1.06 - good max correlations during Ip flattop There is an Ohmic H-mode from 0.75-0.898 s with small ELM bursts starting at 0.826 s. The ELMs have a growing 200 kHz precursor oscillation. There is also a good QCM mode during that time that has a 13 km/s EDD poloidal velocity! See entry under TOPIC GPI. No EFIT mapping between 0.78 and 0.9, i.e. the H mode time, yet there is still good mcax correlation (0.5-0.7) max correlations ~0.6
max cor=0.60 at t=0.759 with R,Z=89.92,-1.47 max cor=0.69 at t=0.766 with R,Z=89.53,-1.08 max cor=0.66 at t=0.772 with R,Z=89.53,-1.08 max cor=0.57 at t=0.779 with R,Z=89.53,-1.08 max cor=0.55 at t=0.786 with R,Z=89.53,-1.08 max cor=0.52 at t=0.792 with R,Z=90.30,-1.08 max cor=0.51 at t=0.799 with R,Z=89.53,-1.08 max cor=0.35 at t=0.805 with R,Z=89.53,-1.08 max cor=0.50 at t=0.812 with R,Z=89.53,-1.08 max cor=0.52 at t=0.818 with R,Z=89.92,-1.08 max cor=0.63 at t=0.825 with R,Z=90.30,-1.08 max cor=0.52 at t=0.831 with R,Z=89.92,-1.08 max cor=0.60 at t=0.838 with R,Z=90.30,-1.08 max cor=0.67 at t=0.845 with R,Z=89.92,-1.08 max cor=0.68 at t=0.851 with R,Z=89.92,-1.08 max cor=0.59 at t=0.858 with R,Z=90.30,-1.08 max cor=0.60 at t=0.864 with R,Z=90.30,-1.08 max cor=0.66 at t=0.871 with R,Z=90.30,-1.08 max cor=0.49 at t=0.877 with R,Z=89.92,-1.08 max cor=0.68 at t=0.882 with R,Z=89.92,-1.08 max cor=0.54 at t=0.886 with R,Z=90.30,-1.08 max cor=0.57 at t=0.890 with R,Z=91.08,-1.08 max cor=0.62 at t=0.894 with R,Z=89.92,-1.08 max cor=0.66 at t=0.898 with R,Z=91.08,-1.08 Max correlation does not change much across the H-to-L transition |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Jan 27 2011 09:11:58:680AM | Robert Granetz | Snowstorm last night/this morning. Start of run is delayed until 10:00. Granetz filling in as physics operator until Steve Wukitch can get in, probably around 10:30. I've loaded Steve's shot that he setup last evening: /home/wukitch/pcs_scratch/pcs_1110127000. Seg 1 is from yesterday, and has been adjusted to account for lack of cryopump today. Seg 2 is for Istvan's morning run. Seg 3 is for Jim Terry's afternoon run. | |
| Jan 27 2011 09:43:24:940AM | Robert Granetz | Steve Wukitch just made it in, so he will takeover now as physop. We still have 15 minutes before the run starts. | |
| Jan 27 2011 10:20:11:650AM | 1110127001 | Steve Wukitch | load from 1110126028 for seg1 startup with adjustment for no
cryopump (25 ms); seg#2 from 1100817016 for USN right gap near 2 cm result: plasma, disruption ~1.4 s, vertical stability 1.3 (marginal at 1.2), MARFE EF1_L magnet above PLC current limits next: lower zxu by 3 mm slow density rise time to 0.6 @0.3 s and 0.9 at 0.7 s Load at 27-Jan-2011 10:17:12.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 10:32:50:000AM | 1110127002 | Steve Wukitch | plasma - better shot but right gap was 1.8 cm at the time of interest
RF was faulting at higher NINJA gas puff near 1 sec causes density rise next: decrease outer gap to 0.7 cm RCUR increased to 0.66 from 0.655 Load at 27-Jan-2011 10:32:31.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 10:46:44:617AM | 1110127003 | Steve Wukitch | plasma - disruption ~0.75 s
startup looks fine suspect a killer brick next: no changes but enabled 50 ms Ar at 0.3 s Load at 27-Jan-2011 10:44:08.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 11:16:03:937AM | 1110127004 | Steve Wukitch | plasma - still marfe-ing
second MARFE is related to the RF turning off with high nl_04 first MARFE start up okay next: tweak density rise to try to avoid early MARFE Load at 27-Jan-2011 11:03:36.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 11:26:26:877AM | 1110127005 | Steve Wukitch | plasma - right gap decreased to 0.8 cm from 1 cm on previous
RF power was stair stepped to 1.3 MW start up unchanged (reasonable) next: increase gap to 1.8 cm from 0.8 cm Load at 27-Jan-2011 11:25:05.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 11:40:16:437AM | 1110127006 | Steve Wukitch | plasma - right gap = 1.8 cm at 1 s
vertical unstable toward end of discharge change antennas but keep waveform same next: adjust zxu down 2 mm to avoid vertical instability lower density to 0.7 to avoid late MARFE |
| Jan 27 2011 11:54:00:550AM | 1110127007 | Steve Wukitch | plasma - right gap 1.8 cm at 1 s
vertical stability was better next: reduce outer gap to ~0.8 cm by increasing RCUR to 0.66 from 0.653 Load at 27-Jan-2011 11:53:43.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 12:10:13:790PM | 1110127008 | Steve Wukitch | plasma right gap ~0.8-1 cm
moly brick at 1.2 s - does not kill the plasma density has drifted down start up okay next: change to J antenna and higher power anticipate the push from RF - request smaller outer gap by 1 mm Load at 27-Jan-2011 12:09:38.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 12:30:41:580PM | 1110127009 | Steve Wukitch | plasma - runaway startup - looks like something increases Zeff at
0.03 s and loop voltage jumps and hard x-rays follow. next: repeat without runaways |
| Jan 27 2011 12:30:24:590PM | 1110127010 | Steve Wukitch | plasma - no hards this time - late MARFE
right gap 0.8 at 1 s startup okay next: increase outer gap to 1.8 cm Load at 27-Jan-2011 12:29:46.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 12:46:10:113PM | 1110127011 | Steve Wukitch | plasma - two injections from J antenna front tiles/FS correlate with trips
right gap ~1.8 cm at 1 s next: change to D and E antennas and repeat Load at 27-Jan-2011 12:45:48.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 01:00:36:173PM | 1110127012 | Steve Wukitch | plasma - injection around 1.2 s
right gap ~1.8 cm at 1 s start up looks okay next: reduce right gap to ~0.8 cm (RCUR to 0.661) Load at 27-Jan-2011 12:58:11.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 01:16:47:570PM | 1110127013 | Steve Wukitch | USN plasma - no injection this time
right gap ~0.9 cm next: right gap to ~1.8 cm Load at 27-Jan-2011 13:10:50.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 01:27:26:183PM | 1110127014 | Steve Wukitch | USN plasma - good shot
right gap ~0.9 cm next: repeat with different ICRF |
| Jan 27 2011 01:45:48:290PM | 1110127015 | Steve Wukitch | 015 USN plasma - good shot
right gap ~0.9 cm next: switch to MP587a, switch segment #3 on segment #2 off, LSN Load at 27-Jan-2011 13:42:31.00 cell access to power cycle FRCECE CPCI crate |
| Jan 27 2011 02:05:06:977PM | 1110127016 | Steve Wukitch | LSN plasma into ramp down
good repeat of 1100120023 next: raise current to 0.75 s at 1.25 sec decrease outer gap to 0.8 from 1.4 cm (RCUR from 0.657 to 0.66) Load at 27-Jan-2011 14:03:44.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 02:14:43:270PM | 1110127017 | Steve Wukitch | LSN plasma into ramp down
right gap only went to 1.1 cm next: increase outer gap further (RCUR from 0.66 to 0.663) Load at 27-Jan-2011 14:10:07.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 02:33:18:170PM | 1110127018 | Steve Wukitch | LSN plasma into ramp down
right gap 0.8-1 cm next: raise BT to 4.6 T (127 kA), IP 1.02-0.95 MA, nl_04=5 Load at 27-Jan-2011 14:29:27.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 02:44:30:487PM | 1110127019 | Steve Wukitch | LSN plasma into ramp down, 4.6 T, Ip= 1. MA
right gap 0.8 cm next: raise Ip to 1.07 - 0.97 MA Load at 27-Jan-2011 14:43:43.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 02:58:31:330PM | 1110127020 | Steve Wukitch | LSN plasma into rampdown
next: return to 3.6 T (-96.5 kA), IP=0.7-0.63 MA Load at 27-Jan-2011 14:57:52.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 03:15:48:313PM | 1110127021 | Steve Wukitch | LSN plasma into rampdown, 3.6 T
next: tweak early outer gap to hold it more constant tweak current to .65-.53 MA Load at 27-Jan-2011 15:15:29.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 03:43:21:393PM | 1110127023 | Steve Wukitch | LSN plasma, disruption ~0.64 s
OH commutation failure next: repeat Load at 27-Jan-2011 15:43:00.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 03:55:57:260PM | 1110127024 | Steve Wukitch | LSN plasma, disruption ~0.8 s
startup is okay lots of junk from 0.035 s density may be too low next: raise density to 4x10^19, modify current to 0.66 MA at 1.25 s Load at 27-Jan-2011 15:54:54.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 04:08:32:680PM | 1110127025 | Steve Wukitch | LSN plasma, right gap ~1.2 cm
next: decrease right gap to 0.8 cm Load at 27-Jan-2011 16:06:13.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 04:18:26:453PM | 1110127026 | Steve Wukitch | LSN plasma, right gap ~0.8 cm
next: 5.4 T (-150 kA), I=0.77-0.67 MA, nl04~5x10^19 Load at 27-Jan-2011 16:17:11.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 04:32:42:370PM | 1110127027 | Steve Wukitch | LSN plasma, right gap ~0.5 cm at 1 s, 5.4 T
next: tweak gap a bit with RCUR for larger gap Load at 27-Jan-2011 16:32:17.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 04:46:42:683PM | 1110127028 | Steve Wukitch | LSN plasma, right gap ~1 cm at 1 s, 5.4 T
next: reload 025 and increase density to 1x10^20 at 1 s. Load at 27-Jan-2011 16:45:39.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 04:57:24:090PM | 1110127029 | Steve Wukitch | LSN plasma, right gap ~1.2 cm at 1 s, 3.6 T, nl04~0.9
next: decrease right gap, Ip to 0.705 MA Load at 27-Jan-2011 16:56:08.00 |
| Jan 27 2011 05:06:57:407PM | 1110127030 | Steve Wukitch | LSN plasma - ohmic H-mode
End of run |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 09:55:46:760AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 2 | 10:18:45:303AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 10:33:16:973AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 10:46:40:047AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 11:16:05:950AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 11:29:31:087AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 11:43:31:093AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 11:56:31:023AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 12:11:13:030PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 12:23:54:957PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 12:37:53:700PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 12:51:24:527PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 01:06:02:410PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 01:22:08:497PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 01:38:47:273PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 01:52:12:453PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 02:05:25:270PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 02:18:51:600PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 02:31:24:017PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 02:44:57:677PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 02:58:42:653PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 03:15:57:653PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 03:29:39:040PM | Plasma | Bad | Oh commfailure |
| 24 | 03:43:38:777PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 03:56:11:417PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 04:08:43:287PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 04:21:05:187PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 04:35:32:557PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 04:48:51:313PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 30 | 05:01:31:567PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| System Availability | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jan 27 2011 09:55:31:393AM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||