| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Jim Terry,Anne White |
| Physics operator(s): | Steve Scott |
| Engineering operator(s): | Andy Pfeiffer,Ed Fitzgerald,Gary Dekow |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| First 2 hours MP #635 SL Jim Terry MP 610 begins at 11 am SL Anne White |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Mar 9 2011 03:39:58:897PM |
| Author: Jim Terry |
| First 2 hours of the run is devoted to completing MP #635
"Effects of RF heat on edge/SOL poloidal velocities" This follows two previous half days devoted to this MP; the others took place on 1110127 (with normal field) and 1110218 (with reversed field, but with no J antenna operation) Note that this run is with REVERSED field (and Ip) direction. We desire normal ECDC preparation in D2. NINJA with 10 PSI He4 We are examining the strong changes in the edge/SOL profiles of the phase velocities of the fluctuations brought about by the application of ICRF power above a threshold of ~0.6 MW. These changes are measured by the outboard midplane GPI. Critical diagnostics: Midplane GPI A port scanning probe - to probe when PRF<1 MW Emissive probe on S3 The run plan is: Load (reversed field) shot 1110218001. Ip=0.8 MA Bt=5.4 T (-->q95=4.7) LSN adjust NL04 of the target plasma to 0.7e20 m-2 adjust outer gap to 2.0 cm adjust D & J RF waveforms be the following:
This provides a J antenna power scan followed by a D & J power scan at q_95=4.7 Puff the NINJA so that the puff hits the plasma at 0.98 s Perform 4 shot q_95 scan (with Bt=5.4 T) in order to vary the mapping from GPI to the D & J antennas (Bt=5.4 T) Ip=0.8 MA (NL04=0.8e20) (-->q95=4.7) Ip=0.6MA (NL04=0.7e20) (--> q95=9.5) Ip=1.0MA (NL04=0.8e20) (--> q95=3.8) Ip=1.2MA (NL04=1.3e20) (--> q95=3.16) Reload the first successful (q_95, Ip=0.8, Bt=5.4 T) shot from this run. Change SSEP programming so that SSEP sweeps from -2 cm at 1.05 s to +1.5 cm at 1.40 s and hold SSEP at +1.5 cm until 1.45 s. Thus we sweep from LSN, through DN, to USN. The RF power is at 1.0 MW from J only. 3 good shots Change heating scheme and gyro-radius by loading shot 1110218018 with Bt=2.7 T Bt=2.7T, Ip=0.4MA (-->q95=4.7) NL04=0.4e20 m-2 (2nd harmonic H minority) The RF waveform (J only) will be stepped in three steps (0.6, 1.0, 1.4 MW) with the 1st step starting at 1.05 s and each step lasting 0.1 s. This may take a few shots to get the RF tuning Total of 8-10 shots |
| Entered: Mar 9 2011 05:16:23:390PM |
| Author: Anne White |
| MP 610 begins at 11 am
MP 610: - Investigate Thomson/ECE Discrepancy in High Temperature Discharges Session leaders: A. White, Y. Lin, A. Hubbard, J. Hughes, S. Wukitch TS: Y. Ma, PCI: P. Ennever March 10th, 2011 Thursday Goal of MP 610: Run as many shots as possible with Te(0) > 9 keV for making detailed TS/ECE comparisons to study discrepancy seen on TFTR/JET. Optimize MC heating via adjustment of He3 puff length to vary He3 concentration. We will run +90 degree phase for J antenna (waves in the counter-Ip direction), because previously this phase resulted in a longer sawtooth period... and higher Te. Expect minor tweaks to Bt to shift ECE locations to overlap better with core TS points. NOTE: Extended Run 11 am �- 6 pm - Use reference LSN shot from an 8 T day, e.g. 1110216 per PO suggestion, or if it looks better, use a LSN from the day before. - B_T = 8.0 T, I_p = 1 MA, nL04 = 0.5e20 - He3 puff starting with 150 ms and adjusting to get good MC heating on axis Required sub-systems: ICRF (D,E,J) at max power, 8 T, w/He3 puffing for MC heating GPC1 and GPC2 with gratings for 8 T, Michelson (may need to adjust aperture to avoid saturation, which would require us to recalibrate with the reduced aperture), HIREX, PCI (for He3 concentration monitoring), McPherson helium monitor Shot Plan: 8 T partial day, expect total of 10-14 shots 1) 1-3 shots, bring machine up to 8 T: (See PO plan) 2) 2-3 shots, modulated RF to determine MC layer location If we have whole day, then perform this step. If we have only a half day, then skip this step and go to step 3. Use modulated RF to determine MC layer location. He3 puff is set to 150 ms. RF programming, all antennas, (or just one or two antennas, per RF group guidance), power modulated (40 on, 60 off) from t = 0.6 - 1.3 s Monitor GPC channels to observe prompt break in slope as ICRF power is modulated. This tells us location of mode conversion. Monitor He3 concentration with PCI. We can run Yijun�??s analysis using as input the He3 concentration, the Bt, the wave frequency and the plasma density profile to calculate the MC layer location. Repeat with an adjusted He3 puff length (100 or 200 ms depending on how we need to move MV layer.) 3) 3 shots, steady RF pulse, scan of He3 concentration to maximize Te on axis B_T = 8.0 T, I_p = 1 MA, nL04 = 0.5e20 We want to adjust the 3He puff length (He3 concentration) shot by shot to get the MC layer as close to on-axis and produce as High Te as possible, as informed by step 2 (if there was time for step 2) . If we did step 2, then scan as follows: He3 Puff length first of 50 ms, then 200 ms, then then 150 ms If we skipped step 2, then scan as follows: He3 Puff length first of 150 ms, then 50 ms, then 200 ms Use phasing of antennas (per Yijun's guidance) in counter current direction to lengthen the sawtooth period. This is done in an attempt to sustain for longer time the higher core Te before sawtooth crash. Use steady RF pulse, with all three antennas (D, E and J at 78-80 MHz) on steady to get maximum power entire L-mode time of interest. RF Demand would be something similar to this: D: t = [0.6, 1.3] sec, 1.30 MW, 80.5 MHz E: t = [0.6, 1.3] sec, 1.00 MW, 80.0 MHz J3: t = [0.6, 1.3] sec, 1.25 MW, 78.0 MHz J4: t = [0.6, 1.3] sec, 1.25 MW, 78.0 MHz 4) 6 shots, Repeat High Te shot with TS, GPC and Michelson data obtained B_T = 8.0 T, I_p = 1 MA, nL04 = 0.5e20 Using whatever He3 puff length gave maximum Te on axis in part 3), now just repeat that set-up to gather as much high Te TS and ECE data. Steady RF power t = 0.6-1.3 s. Diagnostics and plasma issues to keep an eye out for: saturation of signals, offset in magnetic axis position, timing and quality of TS data, position of LSN strike points and occurrence of injections. |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Entered: Mar 9 2011 05:50:41:807PM |
| Author: Steve Scott |
| -------------------------------------
Engineering Setup: REVERSE FIELD ------------------------------------- Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 18:00 *** EXTENDED RUN *** Power systems as on: 1110218001. Note: starting at about 11 AM, we will want to increase BT to 8 Tesla Acoil: -Dtop +Dbot +Jtop -Jbot (for reverse field) Hybrid Enabled Gas setup: B-Top D2 6 psi Hybrid enabled (PG4) B-side lower Ar 1 psi Hybrid DISABLED (PG1) B-side upper He3 15 psi Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) B-main (C-side) D2 40 psi Hybrid enabled (PG3) H-bottom Neon 2 psi Hybrid enabled (PG5) NINJA with 10 psi He4 Hybrid enabled Enable gate-valves and shutters: ECE, VUV, HiREX Sr, Xeus, B-spectrometer Leave z-bolo shutter as is (should be open) Torvac gatevalve toggle (yes/no):keep gate value open during pulse Boronization(yes/no): no Overnight ECDC (yes/no): no ICRF(yes/no): yes LH(yes/no): no Cryopump (yes/no): in standby starting at 11 AM DNB (yes/no): no Vessel temperature: 35/35/35 ------------------------------ ECDC Parameters (if requested) ------------------------------ gas and pressure: D2 at 2e-4 Torr sweep: 44/45/103 cm scan: 20/120 s This is a two-part experiment. The first two hours will complete MP635, "Effects of RF heating on the edge/SOL poloidal velocity". We will start with reference shot 1110218001 (5.4 T, 0.8 MA, reverse-field, LSN). Take segment #1 from last shot from yesterday, 1110309034 Changes to this shot: Nl04 --> 0.7 e20 m^-02 outer gap --> 2.0 cm don't forget to enable NINJA! note: upon inspection, these aren't changes. the programmed density is 0.7e20, and the outer gap we got on shot 1110218001 was between 2.0 and 2.1 cm. We will start with scan of density and current: Ip NeL 1. 0.8 0.8e20 2. 0.6 0.7e20 3. 1.0 0.8e20 4. 1.2 1.3e20 Then reload 1st successful shot from today (5.4 T, 0.8 MA). Impose an ssep sweep: ssep = -2 cm at 1.05 sec to + 1.5 cm at t=1.40 and hold ssep at +1.5 cm until 1.45 sec. For this shot, PRF = 1 MW (J-antenna). Then load shot 1110218018 (Ip=0.4 ; Bt ramps down to 2.7 T), NeL04 = 0.4e20. RF = 2nd harmonic H minority. RF waveform, J-only: 0.6, 1.0, and 1.4 MW. Total of 8-10 good shots will complete this part of the day. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ At about 11 AM, we move on to MP610, "Investigate Thomson / ECE discrepancy in high temperature discharges". Increase TF current limit to allow operation at 8.0 Tesla. Load reference shot: 1110216012 (1.0 MA, 8.0 Tesla). Based on experience from March 9, impose a neon puff (100%) from 0.32 to 0.45 sec to control divertor heating. Step 1: 2-3 shots with modulated RF power to determine location of MC layer. Set He3 puff at 150 ms. Step 2: 3 shots, steady RF heating. Same BT, Ip as in previous shots. If we did step 1, then He3 puffs will be 50, then 200, then 150 ms. If we skipped step 1, then puffs will be 150, then 50, then 200 ms. We want maximum RF power in these shots, all from 0.6 --> 1.3 sec. PRF MHz D 1.30 80.5 E 1.00 80.0 J3 1.25 78.0 J4 1.25 78.0 Step 3: Using optimum He3 puff that was identified in previous step, repeat that condition to get as much TS and ECE data as possible. |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Mar 10 2011 06:27:39:467PM |
| Author: Anne White |
| SL Summary for Run 11103010: 11 am to 6 pm, shots 11 through 23.
MP 610 Investigate discrepancy between TS and ECE measurements at high Te We were able to obtain several shots with Te0 ~ 7-8 keV transiently today, but we were not able to reproduce the very high Te with the long sawteeth from 1100211 and 1100210 runs. That method relied on on-axis MC heating, and using J antenna in counter current phasing to significantly increase the period and the amplitude of the sawtooth oscillations. Two factors contributed to this. First, J antenna could not be run at steady power with the counter current phasing today. Second, with the LSN shape we were not able to keep density low enough reliably. Interestingly, on several shots nl04 did stay low (~0.6) but more often it was up near 0.9. This could be mainly due to the RF, as density rises when the RF is on steady, but perhaps not in all cases (e.g. 17 and 23 had surprisingly low densities compared to nominal repeat shots). On several shots we performed a Bt ramp from 8T down to 7.8 T in order to find the optimum location for RF deposition to obtain larger, longer sawtooth periods. Based on this we can safely say that we were not simply missing the sweet spot. We varied the He3 puff from 50-200 ms shot to shot but there was too much variation in other parameters (RF power, density) to settle on which puff length was optimum for maintaining the proper He3 concentration. See PCI and RF notes, where there is more discussion of this. From the operations side of things, the machine ran very well today. We had a few shots with late disruptions that still yielded good physics data. There was one monster disruption in shot 13 that took us down for about an hour from 1 -2 pm today, shot 14 was a power supply test shot. The engineering team did amazing job at bringing us back up, we didn't miss a beat and started right back in with 8T shots. Overall, it was discouraging that we could not reliably reproduce the High Te using the 2009 recipe from 1100211/1100210. We did however obtain enough shots with Te0 between 5-8 keV to let us start looking at the TS and ECE data and performing the careful comparisons. I think any future attempts at producing High Te would benefit from careful pre-experiment J-antenna conditioning for the reverse Ip phase operation (which we really think is crucial to the sawtooth period modifications and hence the High Te that can be obtained with only 2 MW power.) Also, there are heating scenarios at 50 MHz,lower field (5-6 T) that should be explored in the future. |
| Entered: Mar 15 2011 09:12:50:680AM |
| Author: Jim Terry |
| Summary for 1110310 (1st two hours of the run) which
was used to complete MP 635 - "Effects of RF heat on edge/SOL poloidal velocities" This follows two previous half days devoted to this MP; the others took place on 1110127 (with normal field) and 1110218 (with reversed field, but with no J antenna operation) Note that this run is with REVERSED field (and Ip) direction. We were able to complete 1) a q_95 and ICRH power scan with J antenna only and with J combined with D antenna; 2) a comparison of USN and LSN configurations with 0 and 1 MW of ICRH power from J antenna only (with Ip=0.8 MA and Ip=0.6 MA, i.e. q_95=4.7 and 5.5 respectively). We did not complete the power scan in the low field (Bt=2.7 T), 2nd harm. minority heating scenario. (We ran out of time.) We were able to get good GPI data from the APD array and from the outboard midplane fast Phantom camera (although the Phantom data is not available for shots 3 and 4). The shot summary is (all with Bt=5.4 T, LSN): q scan with J and J+D power scan 003 Ip=0.8MA, J ant(0-1.5 MW) and J&D ants (0-2.1 MW), NL04=0.75-0.95e20 004 Ip=0.6MA, J ant(0-1.5 MW) and J&D ants (0-2.1 MW), NL04=0.5-0.81e20 saturation on some APD views 005 Ip=0.6MA, J ant(0-1.5 MW) and J&D ants (0-2.1 MW), NL04=0.5-0.82e20 006 Ip=1.0MA, J ant(0-1.5 MW) and J&D ants (0-2.1 MW), NL04=0.8-1.1e20 007 Ip=1.2MA, J ant(0-1.5 MW) and J&D ants (0-2.1 MW), NL04=1.0-1.3e20 SSEP sweep LSN to near-DN with 1.1 MW from J only 008 Ip=0.8MA, NL04=0.5-0.8e20, SSEP from -2 cm (LSN) to -0.5 cm USN (J ant to 1.1 MW at 1.22 s) 009 Ip=0.8MA, NL04=0.7-0.95e20 010 Ip=0.6MA, NL04=0.55-0.83e20 Observations: at q95=4.25 (shot 003) the addition of D power to J power seems only to bring up an IDD propagating feature in far-SOL. at q95=5.4 (shot 004-005) the addition of D power to J power doesn't seem to change the phase velocities. at q95=3.55 (shot 006) the addition of D power to J power seems only to bring up an IDD propagating feature in far-SOL and increase EDD velocities in mid-SOL. Roughly the addition of D power "breaks" the linear dispersion of the EDD propagating features, "speeding up" the higher frequency (>50 kHz) fluctuations. at q95=3.0 (shot 007) Qualitatively similar to 0.8MA and 1.0MA cases, continuing the trend of increasing the radial width of the IDD propagation in the far SOL. The IDD propagation with D+J is significantly faster than with J alone (factor of ~2). no significant effect on the phase velocities in sweeping SSEP from -2.0 to -0.5 cm (shot 008) Comparing LSN (J ant only) to USN (J ant only) - shots 003,009 (q=4.25) shot 003 - LSN
shot 009 - USN
compare 3rd thumbnail in LSN shot with thumbnails 4-6 in the USN shot Comparing LSN (J ant only) to USN (J ant only) - shots 005,010 (q=5.4) shot 005 - LSN
shot 010 - USN
compare 3rd thumbnail in LSN shot with thumbnails 4-6 in the USN shot The final observation that is very mysterious is the effect of a MARFE in the upper divertor on the no-RF power flows. On Shot 009 (USN) there is a rapid change in the recyling light in the upper divertor at 1.13 s. (Below is the trace from the H_alpha dectector that views the upper part of the machine's inner column.)
At the same time there is a shift from IDD propagating features to EDD propagating features. This is shown below. We hypothesize that the SOL flows are being changed significantly by the conditions in the upper divertor. Strong effects of MARFE on parallel SOL flows have previously been documented using Mach probes (see thesis and papers by Smick and LaBombard). Below are the conditional (f,k_pol) spectra at the two times straddling the MARFE "disappearance" for the column at rho -0.7 cm
Now for the column at rho 0.06 cm
![]() |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Mar 10 2011 06:41:23:687PM |
| Author: Steve Scott |
| Summary of MP
Special technical problem: shot 13 disrupted due to a failure in the power supply control system. MP635: shots 1 --> 10 This part of the expt went reasonably smoothly. The first shot (2) was a fizzle, and the ssep sweep shot (8) disrupted due to vertical instability (elongation too high). Other than that, this part of the expt was a success. One lesson learned: the SL plan clearly specified that some shots would have an ssep sweep. Being a novice physOp, I assumed that there would be an ssep sweep controller in the DPCS reference shot, so I assumed it would be trivial to program up the demanded ssep waveform. But in fact, there is no such controller, and so Steve Wolfe had to intervene and program in changes to about 4 position variables. This would have been impossible for me. MP610: shots 11 --> 23 This part of the experiment was less successful. We experienced 7 disruptions, of which 5 were sufficiently early that the value of the shot was compromised at least partially. Most of the disruptions were caused by injections, although there was one power-supply-control disruption. The second major challenge was getting RF to work at the proper phasing (RF worked OK in purely heating mode). The third challenge was density control: an early shot (17) looked promising in that the density remained low. For reasons that I don't understand, some subsequent shots had higher NeL during the RF heating phase and this probably limited the rise in Te. Then, in the final two shots, the density behaved much better. Shots 19 and 20 had a small BT ramp of 8.0 --> 7.8 Tesla during the period of RF heating. The purpose of this was to look for a sweet spot to put the heating on-axis. The BT ramp on shot 19 was deliberate, and the ramp on shot 20 was a mistake. There was no indication of enhanced performance at any field in the ramp Statistics: test shots 2 plasma attempts 21 plasmas 20 fizzles 1 disrupted in ohmic: 1 disrupted during RF: 5 disrupted during rampdown: 2 special disruption* 1 * (power supply system failure) full length: 11 Injections We experienced a variety of injections today, which we think were responsible for most of the disruptions. Matt reported injections of: copper, iron, moly, and tungsten. Gasses: we were injecting D, He3, Neon, and Argon for most of the day. Plus we have residual H. So the number of elements we inject deliberately, plus those we get for free, is a significant fraction of the periodic table. |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Mar 10 2011 09:07:58:440AM | Jim Terry | NINJA set up with 10 PSI He^4
puff from AB-lim start triggers at 0.87 and 1.0 sec, each with duration 0.1 s APDs take data from 1.0 to 1.45 s Phantom taking data from 1.13 s to 1.258 s Both have He I 587 nm filters | |
| Mar 10 2011 09:36:11:753AM | 1110310003 | Jim Terry | NINJA set up with 10 PSI He^4
puff from AB-lim start triggers at 0.87 and 1.0 sec, each with duration 0.1 s Good shot Gas hits at 1.01 s instead of 0.98 s APDs take data from 1.0 to 1.45 s no Phantom data Next shot: move 1st NINJA trigger to 0.845 s go to Ip=0.6 MA, NL04 target=0.6e20 |
| Mar 10 2011 09:53:12:283AM | 1110310003 | Jim Terry | NINJA set up with 10 PSI He^4
puff from AB-lim start triggers at 0.87 and 1.0 sec, each with duration 0.1 s Good shot Gas hits at 1.01 s instead of 0.98 s APDs take data from 1.0 to 1.45 s no Phantom data Next shot: move 1st NINJA trigger to 0.845 s go to Ip=0.6 MA, NL04 target=0.6e20 |
| Mar 10 2011 10:22:10:283AM | 1110310004 | Jim Terry | NINJA set up with 10 PSI He^4
puff from AB-lim start triggers at 0.845 and 1.0 sec, each with duration 0.1 s Good shot Gas hits before 1.0 s as it should APDs take data from 1.0 to 1.45 s outermost colum saturated part of the time. no Phantom data Next shot: repeat, reducing gain on outer columns |
| Mar 10 2011 10:22:49:877AM | 1110310005 | Jim Terry | NINJA set up with 10 PSI He^4
puff from AB-lim start triggers at 0.845 and 1.0 sec, each with duration 0.1 s Good shot Gas hits at before 1.0 s as it should APDs take data from 1.0 to 1.45 s still no Phantom data Next shot: go to Ip=1.0 MA, NL04 target=0.8e20 I have repowered the Phantom at the camera and it seems to be working again for the next shot |
| Mar 10 2011 10:20:49:343AM | 1110310006 | Jim Terry | NINJA set up with 10 PSI He^4
puff from AB-lim start triggers at 0.845 and 1.0 sec, each with duration 0.1 s Good shot Gas hits at before 1.0 s as it should APDs take data from 1.0 to 1.45 s got Phantom data Next shot: go to Ip=1.2 MA, NL04 target=1.0e20 |
| Mar 10 2011 10:29:58:047AM | 1110310007 | Jim Terry | NINJA set up with 10 PSI He^4
puff from AB-lim start triggers at 0.845 and 1.0 sec, each with duration 0.1 s Good shot Gas hits at before 1.0 s as it should APDs take data from 1.0 to 1.45 s very little signal on the outer channels (as expected) got Phantom data Next shot: go back to Ip=0.8 MA, NL04 target=0.6e20 put in the SSEP sweep from -2 cm (at 1.05 s) to +1.5 cm at (1.45 s) |
| Mar 10 2011 10:54:27:463AM | 1110310008 | Jim Terry | NINJA set up with 10 PSI He^4
puff from AB-lim start triggers at 0.845 and 1.0 sec, each with duration 0.1 s Shot disrupted at 1.289 s during SSEP sweep (vertically unstable), just before DN 1 MW RF from Jant only Gas hits at before 1.0 s as it should APDs take data from 1.0 to 1.45 s got Phantom data Next shot: give up on the SSEP sweep and go to a pure USN shot Ip=0.8, NL04 target=0.6e20 |
| Apr 28 2011 12:14:36:787PM | 1110310009 | Jim Terry | NINJA set up with 10 PSI He^4
puff from AB-lim start triggers at 0.845 and 1.0 sec, each with duration 0.1 s Good shot USN at 0.8 MA 1 MW RF from Jant only turing on halfway into the GPI data acq periods Gas hits at before 1.0 s as it should APDs take data from 1.0 to 1.45 s got Phantom data Next shot: go to a pure USN shot Ip=0.6, NL04 target=0.5e20 |
| Mar 10 2011 11:12:29:130AM | 1110310010 | Jim Terry | NINJA set up with 10 PSI He^4
puff from AB-lim start triggers at 0.845 and 1.0 sec, each with duration 0.1 s Good shot USN at 0.6 MA 1 MW RF from Jant only turning on halfway into the GPI data acq periods Gas hits at before 1.0 s as it should APDs take data from 1.0 to 1.45 s got Phantom data End of this part of the run. |
| Mar 10 2011 11:22:52:380AM | 1110310011 | Anne White | ********************************************
******************************************** ******************************************** Changing over to MP610: Investigate TS/ECE discrepancy at high Te Shots will be LSN at 8T, 1 MA, nl04 = 0.5 All RF antennas requested, >= 4 MW power. counter Ip phasing on J antenna. He3 puff t0 = 200 ms, delta_t = 150 ms ******************************************** ******************************************** ******************************************** |
| Mar 10 2011 12:12:23:980PM | 1110310011 | Anne White | Shot ran.
got 2.4 MW RF Te(0) ~ 3.5 keV nl04 is a bit too high, at 0.8 Wolfe says He3 puff did go. Tsuji on PCI says He3 fraction looks low, ~ 5% Next shot: request nl04 = 0.5 (was at 0.6 last shot) field is at 7.8 T, will request increase to 8T increase He3 puff to delta t = 200 ms |
| Mar 10 2011 12:41:57:880PM | 1110310012 | Anne White | This shot:
request nl04 = 0.5 (was at 0.6 last shot) field is at 7.8 T, will request increase to 8T increase He3 puff to delta t = 200 ms Result: shot ran He3 at 200 ms Bt = 8.0 T, 1 MA, nl04 droops from 0.9 to 0.7 in time during RF pulse. Te(0) ~ 4 keV 200 ms He3 GPC channel 2 looks good on axis, GPC2 channel 18 and stnd central TS Density is still higher than we'd like, we will ask to condition up cyro to see if that can help. there were some big injections early (before and just when RF came on) that are a bit worrying. Limiter heating is not bad. J antenna not happy, so Yijun is requesting lower power and heating phase (co Ip) until the end of the phase. |
| Mar 10 2011 12:52:47:697PM | 1110310013 | Anne White | Result:
Bt = 8.0 T, Ip = 1 MA, nl04 ~ 0.7, Te0 ~ 5 keV, ne0 ~ 1.5 cryo seems to be helping, and got about 4 MW RF bad news : shot disrupted at 1.2 sec |
| Mar 10 2011 02:52:23:547PM | 1110310015 | Anne White | Shot ran.
8 T, Ip = 1 MA, nl04 = 0.5, ne0 = 1, Te0 ~ 7 keV RF J antenna not too good yet, Yijun will tune it up He3 150 ms see lots of injections. Next shot: just repeat and tune up J antenna I need to keep reminding myself that we see peak Te > 7 kev at certain time slices in the ECE data, but that the image below does not reflect this because the one to one comparison code takes only the TS time points and then finds the ECE data from that TS time... /logbook/whitea/tsece_121_2_1110310015.png is shown below
/logbook/whitea/quickfits_1110310015.png is shown below ![]() |
| Mar 10 2011 03:12:38:030PM | 1110310016 | Anne White | Shot disrupted
Next shot: nl04 request is 0.6 early in time to try and get ne up to survice injections, then nl04 back to 0.5 when RF is on |
| Mar 10 2011 03:37:54:623PM | 1110310017 | Anne White | Shot ran.
8 T, Ip = 1 MA, nl04 = 0.5, ne0 = 1, Te0 ~ 6.5 keV He3 150 ms Next shot: repeat plasma, less power request on J antenna, but try for entire pulse with counter current phasing /logbook/whitea/tsece_121_2_1110310017.png is shown below
/logbook/whitea/quickfits_1110310017.png is shown below ![]() |
| Mar 10 2011 04:12:23:337PM | 1110310018 | Anne White | shot ran.
we are not getting the highest Te. can't get highest power from J at the counter current phasing. Next shot: we are trying a B-field scan from 8.0 T-7.8 T starting at t = 0.7 sec. the J antenna phasing is set at counter current phasing until t ~ 1.2 sec or so. |
| Mar 10 2011 04:26:51:307PM | 1110310019 | Anne White | shot ran.
but again, no high Te phases. the density was too high nl04 ~ 0.8 instead of closer to 0.5.?? increase on He3 to 200 ms also didn't seem to help. The B-field scan from 8.0 T-7.8 T starting at t = 0.7 sec did not reveal any sawtooth period modifications during RF with the Jantenna counter current phasing. We don't seem able to get the power out of J in teh counter current phasing today. Next shot: Fixed at 8 T. raise the current to 1.2 MA keep nl04 request to 0.5 during main RF phase RF in all heating phase, high power. He3 puff 100 ms |
| Mar 10 2011 04:55:36:430PM | 1110310020 | Anne White | Shot disrupted near t ~ 1.16 s
RF power very steady at 4 MW no high Te phases 8 T, 1.2 MA, Te0 ~ 6 keV, nl04 ~ 0.8, He3 puff 100 ms Bt starts ramping down from 8 T to 7.8 T starting at t = 0.8 sec for some reason. Next Shot: Keep Bt fixed at 8 T. we got longer sawteeth when field was higher. reduce the He3 puff to 50 ms keep Ip at 1.2 MA |
| Mar 10 2011 05:13:44:020PM | 1110310021 | Anne White | shot disrupted t ~ 0.68 sec
Before the disruption, the sawteeth started to look quite nice. repeat for the next shot, but avoid (if possible) whatever caused the early Mo source |
| Mar 10 2011 05:39:55:940PM | 1110310022 | Anne White | shot disrupted around t ~ 0.95 sec
Bt=8 T, Ip=1 MA, nl04 ~ 0.7 and Te0 ~ 8 keV before disruption He3 50 ms, RF power dropping out. we got lower density, but also had less RF power Next shot: repeat, get in the steady RF power /logbook/whitea/tsece_121_2_1110310022.png is shown below
/logbook/whitea/quickfits_1110310022.png is shown below
|
| Mar 10 2011 06:06:19:337PM | 1110310023 | Anne White | Thank you everyone!
************************************* ************************************* ************************************* Last Shot of the Day: Shot disrupted about t ~ 1.1 sec Bt = 8T, IP = 1.2 MA,nl04 ~ 0.4 (before disruption) and Te0 ~ 8.3 keV! Antennas in heating phase. Some drop out of E antenna. /logbook/whitea/tsece_121_2_1110310023.png is shown below
/logbook/whitea/quickfits_1110310023.png is shown below
|
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Mar 10 2011 09:06:39:680AM | 1110310001 | Steve Scott | gas test shot: successful |
| Mar 10 2011 09:09:16:733AM | 1110310002 | Steve Scott | DELAY: problem with EF1 power supply. Investigation is in progress. No estimated time to repair at present time. |
| Mar 10 2011 09:24:33:687AM | 1110310002 | Steve Scott | shot ran into trouble at 0.15 sec and was gone by 0.17 sec. There seems to be a lot of early radiated power. got an early marfe, then a prad burst at about 0.13 sec.
Next shot: repeat with no changes. |
| Mar 10 2011 09:39:30:923AM | 1110310003 | Steve Scott | Reasonably good shot. Density is a little high, probably due to NINJA.
Next shot: go to 0.6 MA, NeL = 0.5 |
| Mar 10 2011 09:47:33:407AM | 1110310004 | Steve Scott | Good shot. Nice RF waveform. Got a lower density as requested.
Next shot: exact duplicate of this shot. |
| Mar 10 2011 10:01:30:187AM | 1110310005 | Steve Scott | result: good shot.
Next: 1.0 MA and raise NeL target to 8.e19. |
| Mar 10 2011 10:18:59:140AM | 1110310006 | Steve Scott | Good shot. RF is OK, and got the demanded NeL.
Next: 1.2 MAm neL=1.0 also, enable B-side lower (argon for HIREX). will get a 100 argon puff from 0.300 to 0.375 sec. |
| Mar 10 2011 10:40:47:917AM | 1110310007 | Steve Scott | Good shot.
Next: return to shot 3 (5.4 T, 0.8 MA). reduce NeL demand and impose ssep sweep. |
| Mar 10 2011 10:43:58:813AM | 1110310008 | Steve Scott | to get the ssep sweep:
zxl=0 zxu=+0.07 zcur=-0.009 --> zxu=+0.01 zxl=-0.004 zcur=0.000 courtesy of Steve Wolfe. result: disrupted (vertically unstable) during the ssep sweep at 1.29 sec. |
| Mar 10 2011 10:51:28:293AM | 1110310009 | Steve Scott | reload 1110218017 with two changes:
1. decrease nel to 6.e19 2. raise ip to a full 0.8 MA |
| Mar 10 2011 11:00:17:050AM | 1110310009 | Steve Scott | reload 1110218017 with two changes:
1. decrease nel to 6.e19 2. raise ip to a full 0.85 MA. result: good shot. there is a marfe starting at about 0.8 sec. Next: goto 0.6 MA, nel=0.5e20 (reload shot 4 from today) |
| Mar 10 2011 11:10:12:487AM | 1110310010 | Steve Scott | reload shot 9. reduce Ip demand to 0.65 MA. reduce Nel to 5.e19. |
| Mar 10 2011 12:04:17:347PM | 1110310011 | Steve Scott | going to 8 Tesla. reload shot 1110216012 (8 T, 1.0 MA).
enable B-side upper for He3. decrease fill pressure on neon (H_bottom) to match shot 1110216012. increased neon puff demand from 40 to 100, but retained same timing. He3 puff remains at 0.2 --> 0.32 sec as on reference shot. result: full length shot. Density is a little higher than desired. Did we get all the He3? |
| Mar 10 2011 12:19:56:310PM | 1110310012 | Steve Scott | Increase prefill by 5 ms and increase demand on PG3 in segment 1 from 40 to 60.
decrease Nel demand to 5.e19 increase TF to 225600. --> hoping to get to 8.0 Tesla. engineering limit on TF increased to 232 kA. also increased He3 puff to duration of 200 ms result: full length shot. Density still higher than SL wants. got big injections as 0.42 and 0.58 sec. |
| Mar 10 2011 02:09:19:010PM | 1110310013 | Steve Scott | Turn on cryopump for this shot. Some changes to the J-port RF programming.
increase prefill to 50 ms to compensate for cryopump. also move the neon puff 100 ms closer to the start of RF (0.45 --> 0.55 sec) result: disruption at 1.209 sec. Before that, plasma looked pretty good. startup was a little bouncy |
| Mar 10 2011 02:08:02:673PM | 1110310014 | Steve Scott | Changes:
- decrease He3 puff from 200 to 150 ms. - increase fill pressure for Neon (H_bottom) to 3 PSI - programming on Neon (PG5) is now 60% from 0.4 to 0.5 sec - increase prefill from 50 to 55 ms result: Change of plans: power supply test |
| Mar 10 2011 02:41:44:997PM | 1110310015 | Steve Scott | reload 8 T shot from shot 1100310009. Then:
Changes: - decrease He3 puff from 200 to 150 ms. - increase fill pressure for Neon (H_bottom) to 3 PSI - programming on Neon (PG5) is now 60% from 0.4 to 0.5 sec - increase prefill from 50 to 55 ms result: pretty nice shot. Disrupted in rampdown at 1.34 sec. one big, early injection (0.27 sec) and three injections during RF. the early injection and the last one during RF took a 'divot' out of the plasma current. startup is a little better |
| Mar 10 2011 02:58:06:537PM | 1110310016 | Steve Scott | Conditions: repeat previous shot. Hope for better RF power waveform.
Increase demand on PG1 (argon, for HIREX) from 70 to 100. same timing result: early disruption. Next shot: increase early Nel demand from 5.0 to 6.0e19. But slowly reduce Nel demand in time, returning back to 5.e19 at t=0.7 sec. |
| Mar 10 2011 03:33:31:293PM | 1110310017 | Steve Scott | Have increased the early NeL demand from 5.0e19 to 6.0e19. The Nel demand is back down to 5.0e19 at t=0.7 sec.
result: full-length shot! got PRF=4+ MW, but 'only' Te=6 keV |
| Mar 10 2011 03:50:29:063PM | 1110310018 | Steve Scott | No PhysOp changes for this shot. RF will reduce power a little, hoping to get fewer faults.
result: full length plasma. slightly ratty startup. RF power waveform is poor, so electron temperature goal not achieved |
| Mar 10 2011 04:39:33:150PM | 1110310019 | Steve Scott | 1. increase prepuff from 55 to 60 ms.
2. increase He3 puff from 150 to 200 ms. 3. ramp the TF from 8.0 --> 7.8 Tesla over time period 0.7 --> 1.25 sec result: full length shot. but density during RF is higher, and the Te is not high. |
| Mar 10 2011 04:53:24:110PM | 1110310020 | Steve Scott | Changes:
1. remove BT ramp. BT now flattops at 8.0 T 2. reduce He3 puff to 100 ms duration. 3. raise Ip from 1.0 to 1.2 MA. 4. increase segment-1 PG3 demand from 60 to 75 (same timing) None of these changes really addresses the issue of why the density was higher on shot 17. result: somehow, I did not actually change the BT ramp. survived until disruption at t=1.157 sec, but density is high, and heating is not good. |
| Mar 10 2011 05:08:00:210PM | 1110310021 | Steve Scott | 1. remove the BT ramp ... really, this time.
2. reduce He3 puff to 50 ms result: disrupts at about t=0.687 |
| Mar 10 2011 05:37:54:520PM | 1110310022 | Steve Scott | No PhysOp changes for this shot. Previous shot looked promising (better sawteeth).
Result: shot disrupted at about 0.96 sec. Until then, it was looking pretty good: density lower than in previous few shots, and Te is higher. |
| Mar 10 2011 06:11:26:410PM | 1110310023 | Steve Scott | no physOp changes.
Result: plasma disrupted at 1.07. But the density was low, and Te got transiently to 8.4 keV. |
| Mar 10 2011 06:11:31:353PM | 1110310023 | Steve Scott | no physOp changes.
Result: plasma disrupted at 1.07. But the density was low, and Te got transiently to 8.4 keV. |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 08:58:00:627AM | Test | Ok | |
| 2 | 09:13:18:290AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 09:26:14:613AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 09:40:12:687AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 09:52:39:257AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 10:06:28:347AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 10:20:59:080AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 10:40:34:550AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 10:53:53:183AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 11:09:55:017AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 11:45:26:470AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 12:13:46:613PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 12:46:37:790PM | Plasma | Bad | Type 2 fault (global I<2 T) |
| 14 | 02:07:47:203PM | Test | Ok | OH1,OH2U&OH2L PLC Test |
| 15 | 02:20:19:960PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 02:50:03:567PM | Plasma | Ok | Disruption Generates OH1 Fault |
| 17 | 03:15:24:850PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 03:42:49:243PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 04:10:44:513PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 04:38:08:910PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 05:05:24:787PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 05:30:39:700PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 05:57:05:987PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| System Availability | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mar 10 2011 08:57:45:203AM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||