| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Graham Wright |
| Physics operator(s): | Ron Parker |
| Engineering operator(s): | Andy Pfeiffer,Sam Pierson,Ed Fitzgerald |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| MP622 - Molybdenum nano-filament growth in the Alcator C-mod outer diver |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Apr 6 2011 07:54:14:303AM |
| Author: Graham Wright |
| Shot plan:
Ideal conditions are surface temperatures of >1000 K at the ODIV ramped nose tiles (J cassette). ST will be measured via IR analysis. L-mode plasmas are needed to get power to the divertor plates. ODIV Te should be <15 eV to minimize sputtering to allow fuzz growth, so densities should be in the high range (no cryo pump needed). 5.4 T so reasonable flat-top and inter-shot times are available to accumulate total growth time for the day. Power is injected with ICRF only and as much as possible without LH transition. Model shot (in D2) is 1100303031 but magnetics have been adjusted since then so the strikepoint position (desired on the nose tile) will likely need to be adjusted from this configuration. He flux is not a major factor in fuzz growth rates so there is no need to push the plasma current or ionization (800 kA is adequate) Shots 1-2: - ICRF conditioning, strike point positioning (strike point on nose tile) - High density (NL04 ~1.1 e20) in He - 800 kA - 5.4 T Shot 3: - ICRF ramp from 2-3.5 MW during flat-top at 1.1e20 density to check for LH transition (want to stay in L-mode) Shot 4-6: - Adjust ICRF injection power and (time) profile to achieve optimal surface temperature as early in the flat-top as possible - Small adjustments to density may be needed as well. Shot 7-end (extended run day until 18:00): - Repeat optimized shot as many times as possible to accrue growth time for surface filaments. |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Entered: Apr 5 2011 09:35:47:287PM |
| Author: Ron Parker |
| PO Plan for 1110406
MP622 - Molybdenum nano-filament growth in the Alcator C-mod outer divertor SL: G. Wright PO: R. Parker Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 18:00 ----------------- Engineering Setup ----------------- Power systems as on:1110207004 Acoil: +Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot (standard) Hybrid Enabled Gas setup: Fill B-Top with 6 psi He Hybrid enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar Hybrid DISABLED (PG1) leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) fill B-main (C-side) with 40 psi He Hybrid enabled (PG3) fill NINJA as is Enable gate-valves and shutters: ECE, VUV, Xeus Leave z-bolo shutter as is (should be open) Torvac gatevalve toggle (yes/no): no Boronization(yes/no): no Overnight ECDC (yes/no): yes, in HELIUM ICRF(yes/no): yes, all antennas LH(yes/no): no Cryopump (yes/no): no DNB (yes/no): no Vessel temperature: 35/35/35 ------------------------------ ECDC Parameters (if requested) ------------------------------ gas and pressure: D2 at 5e-5 Torr (Normal for Helium) sweep: 44/45/103 cm scan: 20/120 s |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Apr 7 2011 05:14:51:897PM |
| Author: Graham Wright |
| For a day we wanted to accumulate as much plasma exposure time as possible we lost 21 shots due to:
fizzles = 7 Disruptions = 6 Runaway shutdowns = 5 Controls issues = 3 We had a total of 12 shots at appropriate conditions for fuzz growth. Including the first ~200 ms of rampdown at which the surface temperature was still elevated, this corresponds to 10-12 s of total fuzz growth time The growth conditions achieved were from a high-density (NL04~1.4e20) He discharge (start-up in D2) with 3.25 MW of ICRF power during the flat-top and slightly into the ramp down (0.5-1.7 s). This gave us L-mode discharges with temperatures at the edge in the range of 15-25 eV (slightly higher than our target edge Te of 10-15 eV). Surface temperatures were typically increasing from 900-1100 K at the hottest position throughout the flat-top.
These conditions were repeated for shots 26-39 with disruptions at shots 28 (at 0.5 s before growth conditions achieved) , 33 (at 0.77 s before growth conditions achieved), and 39 (20 ms before ramp-down, so nearly a full flat-top at growth conditions). It is not clear the effect of the disruptions on possible fuzz growth but disruptions for shots 33 and 39 showed only small surface temperature spikes indicating that disruptions did not strike near the ramped tiles. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Apr 6 2011 08:08:48:760PM |
| Author: Ron Parker |
| This turned out to be a difficult run. The shot plan called for repeatable 0.8-1.0 MA, 5.4 T, nel04 ~ 1.2-1.4e20 in helium, with 2-4 MW of ICRH power. Initially, segment 1 was loaded from a helium run in February, shot 1110207003, while segment 2 was loaded from 1100303031 at the SL's request. The first shot actually ran well, lasting into rampdown. The second shot fizzled, and then the problems began. Shot 3 ended up being a no power shot due to a hangup in the shot sequence, and the next 15 shots either disrupted before rampdown (shots 6,7,10 and 15-18), fizzled (shots 4,5,8,13,14), or had engineering issues (shots 11,12.) The single marginally useful shot in this sequence was shot 9, which made it into rampdown. Most of the problems encountered during this extended discharge development phase were due to the difficulty starting up in helium, which generally resulted in fizzles or early disruptions associated with strong runaway production.
Beginning with shot 15, the PO decided to start up in D2 and use helium for density control (PG4.) However, it took some tuning using PG3,which was programmed to open near the time of commutation, to prevent runaways and early disruptions. Using the PG3 waveform developed for the 1110207 run was ineffective since D2 rather than He was being used for the breakdown and early startup. At the suggestion of Jim Irby, the PG3 waveform recently used for D2 discharges was used for early helium injection. After a little tuning of the PG4 pulse length, reliable startups were obtained for the rest of the run. As time went on, it was found that adding additional gas for the prepulse seemed to further improve the startup by eliminating early runaways. After tuning the density demand and increasing the ICRH power to ~ 3+ MW, the conditions required by the SL's plan were finally achieved, regrettably for only 12 shots. Hopefully these will be sufficient to determine whether the "fuzz" seen in helium discharges in linear machines is or is not a possible issue for tokamaks. Scorecard: 39 attempts at plasma, 3 failed shots due to engineering issues, 7 fizzles, 10 disruptions before ramp down and 19 shots lasting into rampdown. |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Apr 6 2011 09:13:23:517AM | 1110406001 | Graham Wright | Full shot
Strike point sits on nose tile but sweeps up into USN near the end of flat top. RF power looks stable but ODIV Te is ~30 eV so density will have to be raised. Try 1.3 e20 NL04 for next shot IR camera saturated so ne temperature feedback |
| Apr 6 2011 09:19:04:410AM | 1110406002 | Graham Wright | fizzle |
| Apr 6 2011 09:31:39:907AM | 1110406003 | Graham Wright | no power shot |
| Apr 6 2011 09:46:45:277AM | 1110406004 | Graham Wright | fizzle |
| Apr 6 2011 10:06:38:260AM | 1110406005 | Graham Wright | fizzle |
| Apr 6 2011 10:23:07:360AM | 1110406006 | Graham Wright | Start-up was successful but disrupts at ~300 ms. |
| Apr 6 2011 10:42:55:260AM | 1110406007 | Graham Wright | Reached flat-top after a blip in plasma current during ramp up. Strike point positioning looked good although still swept up near the end of flat-top
2 MW ICRF looked stable. Disrupts (1 MA) at ~1.37 s ODIV Te still at ~30 eV during flat-top with NLO4 1.2e20 but drops down to ~10 eV just before disruption when the density increased to ~1.4e20 and plasma starting moving up into USN IR camera shows temperature turning over before end of shot, likely due to increasing density and dropping ODIV Te |
| Apr 6 2011 10:44:58:043AM | 1110406008 | Graham Wright | fizzle (post-disruption?) |
| Apr 6 2011 11:08:21:013AM | 1110406009 | Graham Wright | Good shot with 1 s flat-top. Small disruption during ramp down.
ODIV Te still quite high even with increased density. Difficult to increase the denisty more since we are limited to how quickly we cn ramp it up. We will try nudging the density up a little more but we may need to pull back on the ICRF power if density increase don't help enough. IR camera shows max surface temperatures in excess of 1100 K so we are in our target growth region assuming it is not being all sputtered away. |
| Apr 6 2011 12:14:35:723PM | 1110406010 | Graham Wright | Full current (1 MA) disruption at ~1.28 s.
ODIV Te was down to ~15 eV as NL04 ramped up to 1.4e20 so that is improving but will have to check how that impacted peak Te. Will try again at same density Disruption caused by running out of V-s and plasma becoming vertically unstable. Max V-s is moved upwards to give us more operating room |
| Apr 6 2011 11:34:42:867AM | 1110406011 | Graham Wright | no TF |
| Apr 6 2011 12:15:03:913PM | 1110406012 | Graham Wright | No TF again
TF was accidentally disabled while modifying the Max V-s. Fixed now. |
| Apr 6 2011 11:45:24:900AM | 1110406013 | Graham Wright | fizzle |
| Apr 6 2011 12:00:58:237PM | 1110406014 | Graham Wright | fizzle
Whoever has the C-Mod voodoo doll, please stop sticking it with needles. Thanks. |
| Apr 6 2011 12:19:03:017PM | 1110406015 | Graham Wright | Runaway shut down |
| Apr 6 2011 12:37:25:553PM | 1110406016 | Graham Wright | runaway shutdown |
| Apr 6 2011 12:42:10:243PM | 1110406017 | Graham Wright | runaway shutdown |
| Apr 6 2011 12:57:23:960PM | 1110406018 | Graham Wright | more of the same |
| Apr 6 2011 01:33:32:397PM | 1110406019 | Graham Wright | Plasma! Full flat-top but disruption right at beginning of ramp down.
ODIV Te is 15-20 eV, when density got up to 1.3-1.4e20, but low density early in the shot means high Te then. Temperature (max) is pretty flat from 0.7-1.5 s at ~700 C Fill in density at ~0.5 s and it should be promising |
| Apr 6 2011 01:35:46:800PM | 1110406020 | Graham Wright | Same shot and similar result. Need to fill in early shot density more.
Surface temperatures are a bit down, possibly due to reduced plasma current (900 kA). ODIV Te looks similar with high Te early in the shot than more manageable Te from 1 s to rampdown. |
| Apr 6 2011 01:35:54:017PM | 1110406021 | Graham Wright | fizzle |
| Apr 6 2011 01:46:57:453PM | 1110406022 | Graham Wright | runaway shutdown |
| Apr 6 2011 02:09:44:483PM | 1110406023 | Graham Wright | Full flat-top but disrupting right at ramp down due to density running away.
Denisty is filling in a bit more but higher density at 0.5 s would help keep ODIV Te down early in the shot. Next shot, small ramp-down of ICRF (1.4-1.5 s) near end of shot to help transition to rampdown. |
| Apr 6 2011 02:42:44:243PM | 1110406024 | Graham Wright | Stable flat-top but still disrupting at rampdown.
This time try extending ICRF out to 1.7 s (rampdown at 1.6 s) Bring early density a bit and late denisty down slightly to try for a flatter density profile for the shot. Temperatures are similar to shot 23 (maxing out at 600 C and hotspot) |
| Apr 6 2011 02:41:09:183PM | 1110406025 | Graham Wright | Density still taking off as soon as ICRF ramp down starts and disrupting plasma.
Denisty profile is basically flat at 1.4e20 from 0.75 s to rampdown. Looks good and keeps ODIV Te down in the 15 eV range Surface temperature is too cold. Only ~500 C or so, try increasing ICRF to 3 MW early and ramping down to 2.5 MW at current rampdown. |
| Apr 6 2011 03:02:15:940PM | 1110406026 | Graham Wright | Stable flat top and ramp down to 400 kA before disrupting the rest of the way.
No H-mode despite increase in ICRF power (3MW ramping down to 2.5 MW). ODIV Te increases to ~20 eV but may be the best we can do with limited time left. Max temp on tile surfaces is 600-700 C. Try higher ICRF so area of appropriate temperature is higher and duration at the appropriate temperature is longer. This will help with accumulation of growth time. Next shot: ICRF 3.25 MW flat from 0.5-1.7 s |
| Apr 6 2011 03:39:59:277PM | 1110406027 | Graham Wright | No H-mode despite 3.25 MW ICRF. Rampdown to 450 kA before disruption.
ODIV Te moving from 25-20 eV through shot. Raw data for surface temperatures look good. This may be our sweet spot. Run it again. Max surface temperatures are ramping up from 600-800 C from 0.8-1.6 s |
| Apr 6 2011 03:23:36:317PM | 1110406028 | Graham Wright | Disrupted at 0.5 s just as ICRF came on. |
| Apr 6 2011 03:38:26:093PM | 1110406029 | Graham Wright | Full flat-top with small disruption (400 kA during ramp down).
ODIV Te 25-20 eV throughout shot. Looks good for a post-disruption shot. |
| Apr 6 2011 03:52:02:103PM | 1110406030 | Graham Wright | Good shot with rampdown to ~300 kA before disruption
Raw data from IR camera identical from shot 29 ODIV Te 25-20 eV throughout shot |
| Apr 6 2011 04:16:13:770PM | 1110406031 | Graham Wright | Current profile very similar to 30 (rampdown to ~300 kA disruption)
ODIV Te looks the same Surface temperature is slowly increasing, perhaps indicating some temperature racheting from shot to shot. Now reaching almost 1000 C at max |
| Apr 6 2011 04:25:39:690PM | 1110406032 | Graham Wright | Same Ip profile.
ODIV Te may be slightly higher by 2-3 eV but still between 25-20 eV from ~0.7-1.5 s Surface temperatures have decreased a bit. This may be due to camera alignment though. Still reaching almost 800 C at max. |
| Apr 6 2011 04:33:23:563PM | 1110406033 | Graham Wright | disruption at ~0.7 s |
| Apr 6 2011 04:54:13:817PM | 1110406034 | Graham Wright | Full shot until ~500 kA disruption from rampdown. Recovered nicely from previous shot.
ODIV TE has moved slightly down again to 25-15 eV throughout the shot. Surface temperatures look good. Maxes still ramping up from 600-800 C |
| Apr 6 2011 05:18:33:937PM | 1110406035 | Graham Wright | Full shot with ~450 kA disruption during rampdown
ODIV Te looks similar to shot 34 Surface temperatures also similar to shot 34 |
| Apr 6 2011 05:23:47:620PM | 1110406036 | Graham Wright | Full shot with ~350 kA disruption during rampdown.
ODIV Te moves from 25-20 eV throughout the shot. Surface temperatures seem to be slowly decreasing from shot to shot? Max temps just under 800 C now. |
| Apr 6 2011 05:39:58:000PM | 1110406037 | Graham Wright | Looks good (normal small disruption at rampdown, typical ODIV Te)
Surface temperatures are back up to 800-900 C |
| Apr 6 2011 05:55:21:997PM | 1110406038 | Graham Wright | Looks good (Ip profile and ODIV Te are normal)
Surface temperatures similar to 37 |
| Apr 6 2011 06:11:03:507PM | 1110406039 | Graham Wright | Disruption for last shot (of course) just before ramp down.
ODIV Te looks normal. Surface temperatures look good. Now large spikes in surface temperature corresponding to disruption so the fuzz may yet live on. |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Apr 6 2011 08:55:25:073AM | 1110406001 | Ron Parker | This will be the last scheduled run for this campaign.
Segment 1 was loaded from shot 1110207004, which was a helium run, just before field reversal. Segment 2 was loaded from shot 1100303031, a shot with outer strike point on the divertor nose. |
| Apr 6 2011 09:17:56:833AM | 1110406001 | Ron Parker | Shot 1 ran fairly well, but there were programmed ramps in ZXL and ZXU that caused the shot to go upper null at about 1.3 s.
For the next shot, we'll take these ramps out. |
| Apr 6 2011 09:18:07:633AM | 1110406002 | Ron Parker | Fizzle |
| Apr 6 2011 09:30:27:063AM | 1110406003 | Ron Parker | A hangup in the control system -- "entering ENIT" repeatedly. |
| Apr 6 2011 09:31:31:293AM | 1110406003 | Ron Parker | No power shot |
| Apr 6 2011 09:36:48:060AM | 1110406003 | Ron Parker | Waiting for Josh to identify problem causing hangup.
Meanwhile, I loaded 1110207014 which should have a more reliable startup, based on PO's log for that run day. |
| Apr 6 2011 09:59:33:927AM | 1110406004 | Ron Parker | Fizzle. Likely too much or too little prefill gas. Next: reduce prefill by 3 ms |
| Apr 6 2011 10:23:09:763AM | 1110406005 | Ron Parker | Slightly more current, but still fizzled.
Next: reduce prefill by 2 more ms. |
| Apr 6 2011 10:22:15:893AM | 1110406006 | Ron Parker | Shot 6 started up with gas reduced 2 more ms.
It disrupted at 31 ms -- density ramp too fast? |
| Apr 6 2011 10:54:24:650AM | 1110406007 | Ron Parker | Shot 7 disrupted at 1.36 s
Steve thinks density rises too fast, so the density fb gain will be reduced to 2.5 and the programmed rate of rise reduced. |
| Apr 6 2011 10:51:14:880AM | 1110406008 | Ron Parker | Shot 8 was a fizzle |
| Apr 6 2011 11:07:29:740AM | 1110406009 | Ron Parker | Shot 9 was better, still disrupted in rampdown at half current.
SL wants density increased, so program nl04 = 1.3e20 m-2. |
| Apr 6 2011 11:18:06:923AM | 1110406010 | Ron Parker | Shot ran to 1.3 s, then disrupted
Next: run again, but fizzle? |
| Apr 6 2011 11:27:08:400AM | 1110406011 | Ron Parker | No TF! |
| Apr 6 2011 11:36:15:153AM | 1110406012 | Ron Parker | Another no TF "shot" |
| Apr 6 2011 11:52:26:807AM | 1110406013 | Ron Parker | PD fizzle. Restore gas pulse to 22 ms |
| Apr 6 2011 12:01:49:190PM | 1110406014 | Ron Parker | Fizzle. Let's go to a deuterium startup |
| Apr 6 2011 12:14:24:653PM | 1110406014 | Ron Parker | Switch to D2 prefill, need to adjust pg 3 if runaways |
| Apr 6 2011 12:35:28:990PM | 1110406015 | Ron Parker | Runaway shutdown |
| Apr 6 2011 12:34:52:170PM | 1110406016 | Ron Parker | Another early disruption. Runaways are an issue -- try to find waveform for PG3 to kill them. |
| Apr 6 2011 12:49:20:820PM | 1110406017 | Ron Parker | Early disruption.
Next: Copy PG3 waveform (for D2) from 1110329022 into PG3 (for He) for next shot |
| Apr 6 2011 01:05:15:283PM | 1110406018 | Ron Parker | Same thing, but PG3 waveform not loaded |
| Apr 6 2011 01:17:49:560PM | 1110406020 | Ron Parker | Useful shot, but disrupted at rampdown. |
| Apr 6 2011 01:24:22:653PM | 1110406020 | Ron Parker | Shot ran OK, still disrupting during rampdown.
Next: Cut density program off at 1.35 s |
| Apr 6 2011 01:36:16:720PM | 1110406021 | Ron Parker | Fizzle, add 2 ms more prefill |
| Apr 6 2011 01:53:48:963PM | 1110406022 | Ron Parker | Early disruption, with runaways. Increase PG4 to 30 ms (add 3ms more) |
| Apr 6 2011 02:30:45:240PM | 1110406023 | Ron Parker | Shot 23 ran into rampdown |
| Apr 6 2011 02:30:59:937PM | 1110406024 | Ron Parker | Shoit 24 ran into rampdown |
| Apr 6 2011 02:33:52:670PM | 1110406025 | Ron Parker | Shoit 25 ran into rampdown
Some early runaways -- increase prefill by 2 ms. |
| Apr 6 2011 02:50:14:857PM | 1110406026 | Ron Parker | Shot 26 ran half way into rampdown -- progress |
| Apr 6 2011 03:06:16:923PM | 1110406027 | Ron Parker | Shot ran halfway into rampdown. Runaways appear early, increase D2 fill by 2 ms |
| Apr 6 2011 03:25:55:230PM | 1110406028 | Ron Parker | Shot 28 disrupted early, at ~ 0.5 s. No runaways, no obvious problem. |
| Apr 6 2011 03:37:26:190PM | 1110406029 | Ron Parker | Shot came back, still disrupts halfway in rampdown |
| Apr 6 2011 03:49:59:993PM | 1110406030 | Ron Parker | Same shot -- watching the fuzz grow |
| Apr 6 2011 04:24:01:847PM | 1110406031 | Ron Parker | Shot 31 ran half way into rampdown |
| Apr 6 2011 04:34:08:630PM | 1110406032 | Ron Parker | Shot 32 ran half way into rampdown |
| Apr 6 2011 04:35:16:783PM | 1110406033 | Ron Parker | Shot 33 disrupted at .77 s |
| Apr 6 2011 04:53:37:770PM | 1110406034 | Ron Parker | Shot 34 came back, disrupting in rampdown |
| Apr 6 2011 05:02:28:290PM | 1110406035 | Ron Parker | Shot 35 ran halfway into rampdown |
| Apr 6 2011 05:16:10:290PM | 1110406036 | Ron Parker | Shot ran into rampdown |
| Apr 6 2011 05:45:53:213PM | 1110406037 | Ron Parker | Shot 37 ran into rampdown |
| Apr 6 2011 05:45:29:033PM | 1110406038 | Ron Parker | Shot 38 ran into rampdown |
| Apr 6 2011 07:24:30:303PM | 1110406039 | Ron Parker | Shot 39 disrupted at beginning of ramp down. |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 08:58:40:383AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 2 | 09:13:30:050AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 09:26:31:973AM | Plasma | Bad | Igor fault |
| 4 | 09:44:10:867AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 10:02:45:270AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 10:15:15:123AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 10:28:29:723AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 10:41:06:440AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 10:53:41:780AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 11:07:39:577AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 11:24:37:193AM | Plasma | Bad | TF Magnet Resistance Fault |
| 12 | 11:34:14:400AM | Plasma | Ok | TF disabled by Engineering Operator shot 11 |
| 13 | 11:42:22:780AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 11:54:52:450AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 12:13:57:677PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 12:26:44:500PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 12:39:40:720PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 12:52:32:073PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 01:05:12:040PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 01:17:45:213PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 01:31:04:260PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 01:44:29:320PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 01:56:55:647PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 02:12:14:683PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 02:25:00:883PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 02:41:15:960PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 03:01:16:040PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 03:19:03:173PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 03:31:09:800PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 30 | 03:44:39:647PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 31 | 04:00:38:460PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 32 | 04:14:48:933PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 33 | 04:29:29:683PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 34 | 04:43:52:017PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 35 | 04:59:19:967PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 36 | 05:13:31:667PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 37 | 05:27:44:200PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 38 | 05:42:16:720PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 39 | 05:59:27:663PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| System Availability | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Apr 6 2011 08:58:21:593AM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||