Alcator C-Mod Run 1120202 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:675
Date Filed:11/11/2011
Title:Initial disruption mitigation experiments with two gas jets
First Author:Geoff Olynyk
Session Leader:Robert Granetz (shots 1-23)
Session Leader:Geoff Olynyk (shots 1-23)

Operators
Session leader(s):Robert Granetz,Geoff Olynyk
Physics operator(s):Jim Irby
Engineering operator(s):Sam Pierson,Bill Parkin,Bill Byford

Engineering Operator Run Comment
MP 675 Initial disruption mitigation experiments with two gas jets

Session Leader Plans
Entered: Feb 1 2012 04:36:10:670PM
Author: Geoff Olynyk
Session leader plan for run 1120202 (Thursday, February 2, 2012)
MP 675 - "Initial disruption mitigation experiments with two gas jets", run 1 of 2.
G.M. Olynyk

Objectives:
(a) Commission second disruption mitigation gas jet and toroidal radiation asymmetry diagnostic (DMBolo).
(b) Begin to study the performance of massive gas injection disruption mitigation with two gas jets, especially as regards toroidal radiation asymmetry during thermal quench.

Gas request:
- D2 majority fuelling.
- Load Ar into B-side lower gas puff in order to get core rotation from HiReX Jr.

Essential diagnostics & systems:
- Fast magnetics - at least the low-n coils on stalks. [T. Golfinopoulos]
- Two-color interferometer [J. Irby]
- ICRF - 1 MW, from E-port 2-strap antenna (transmitter #2) [S.J. Wukitch, Y. Lin]
- X-ray tomography - at least array 3 [R.S. Granetz, I. Faust]
- Core CXRS - impurity temperature and rotation [I. Bespamyatnov]
- FRCECE - [P. Phillips, W. Rowan (U. Texas)]
- Foil bolometry [M.L. Reinke]
- AXUV diode arrays AXA, AXJ with gains turned down for disruption mitigation [M.L. Reinke]
- Disruption mitigation gas jets [R.S. Granetz]
- Fast AXUV diode toroidal array (DMBolo) [G.M. Olynyk]

Desired diagnostics & systems:
- Divertor thermocouples [D. Brunner]
- IR imaging - Already discussed, this will not be available for this run [J. Terry]
- Core rotation from HiReX Jr [J. Rice, Y. Podpaly]
- Core Thomson temperature and density [J. Hughes]
- DNB [R.S. Granetz]
- MSE [R.T. Mumgaard, S. Scott]

Important note for diagnosticians: After disruption mitigation gas jets are fired, torus pressures can rise as high as 1 torr. If you have sensitive diagnostics, these should have their protective gate valves closed.

PhysOp instructions:
We will be running identical, steady target plasmas all day, with the variation coming from the gas jet system. Requested plasma parameters are as follows:
- Target plasma 1120117015 but with X-point moved in radially by 1 cm to lower strike point on outer divertor. (rxl in by 1 cm)
- Ip 1.0 MA
- Btor 5.4 T
- nl04 1.0e20 m-2

Auxiliary system setup instructions:
- ICRF request: 1 MW on E-antenna (transmitter #2), turning on at t=0.800 s, remaining on until (induced) disruption at t=1.000 s
- Timing of DNB pulses should be set so that the DNB is off when the gas jets fire at t=1.000 s. For example, 60 ms on, 40 ms off (100 ms between pulse starts) at 0.520 s, 0.620 s, 0.720 s, 0.820 s, 0.920 s, 1.020 s, etc. would work.
- Load disruption mitigation gas jet plenums with mixture of 85% He, 15% Ar for both of B-port (old) and F-port (new) gas jets.


Run plan:

0. (This will possibly be done before the run, on Wednesday 2012-02-01) Determination of relative timing offset between old (B-port) and new (F-port) gas jets without plasma. Fire gas jets individually and look at pressure pulse on fast pressure transducers on injection pipes. Record relative offset so that jets can be timed relative to both jets arriving at plasma edge at the same time. (No plasma for this phase.)

1. Initial operation, and adjustment of gains on DMBolo. Load target and make field/current/shape adjustments as necessary. Fire old (B-port) and new (F-port) gas jets into plasma at t=1.000 s, twice each. In between shots, this may require cell access to adjust gain on DMBolo system. Refine relative timing between B-port and F-port gas jets. (4 shots)

2. Simultaneous operation of two gas jets. Fire both gas jets at the same time into identical plasma. Repeat three times to figure out any unexpected offsets in the timing of each jet. Attempt to get the two gas jets to fire at the exact same time. Up to four shots allocated for this. (If it is attained earlier, move on to step 3.) (3-4 shots)

3. Staggered gas jet operation scan. This is a scan of the advancement time between triggering to each gas jet. Define delta_T = t_trig_F - t_trig_B - offset_FB. That is, delta_T is the length of time between the triggering signal being sent to the B-port and the F-port gas jets, corrected for the relative offset determined in earlier steps, such that delta_T = 0 means that the two gas jets arrive at the plasma at the same time. Fire gas jets into identical plasmas (as described above in PhysOp instructions) with delta_T = -2.0, -1.0, +1.0, and +2.0 ms. (delta_T = 0 was already covered in the last step.) (4-6 shots)

4. q-scan. Repeat earlier steps with B-port gas jet alone; F-port gas jet alone; both gas jets at the same time (delta_T = 0); and both gas jets with delta_T = +/- 1.0 ms at 5.4 T with currents of 600 kA, 800 kA, and 1.2 MA. Adjust density to maintain fixed T_e. This step will be completed on the first day only if time permits. ~9 shots

Physics Operators Plans
Entered: Feb 1 2012 04:47:51:277PM
Author: Jim Irby
-----------------
Engineering Setup
-----------------

Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 17:00

Power systems as on: 1120117015

Acoil: +Dtop -Dbot -Jtop +Jbot (standard) Hybrid Enabled

Gas setup:

Fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4)
fill B-side lower with 1 psi Ar Hybrid Enabled (PG1)
leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2)
fill B-main (C-side) with 40 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3)
fill NINJA with 10 psi D2 DISABLED

Enable gate-valves and shutters: ECE, VUV, HiREX Sr, Xeus, Loeus
Leave z-bolo shutter as is (should be open)

Torvac gatevalve toggle (yes/no): no

Boronization(yes/no): no
Overnight ECDC (yes/no): yes
ICRF(yes/no): yes
LH(yes/no): no
Cryopump (yes/no): no
DNB (yes/no): yes

Vessel temperature: 35/35/35

------------------------------
ECDC Parameters (if requested)
------------------------------
gas and pressure: D2 at 2e-4 Torr
sweep: 44/45/103 cm
scan: 20/120 s

Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Feb 2 2012 05:14:37:350PM
Author: Geoff Olynyk
Session leader summary for run 1120202 (Thursday, February 2, 2012)
MP 675 - "Initial disruption mitigation experiments with two gas jets", run 1 of 2.
G.M. Olynyk

Today was extremely successful. We commissioned the second (F-port) massive gas
injection disruption mitigation gas jet system, confirmed that the original
(B-port) gas jet system still works, and got a lot of good data for analysis
from the new disruption mitigation bolometry (DMBolo) system.

The start of the run was delayed by about 60 minutes due to the alternator
getting too cold over the maintenance day, and then by another ~15 minutes due
to a software problem with the EngOps widget/panel (changing the start of the
fizzle detector was not working). Thus, we took our first plasma shot (003)
around 10:15 am, and from then on had no more system problems. The MGI system
was exercised from shot 004 onwards.

We ran identical plasmas all day, except that shots 003-011 had Btor=5.42 T, and
then we changed to Btor=5.6 T in order to push the FRCECE resonance layers out
to r/a = 1.0. (With the lower Btor, they were only out to about r/a=0.9.)

Shots 004-009 were with single MGI gas jets in order to refine the relative
timing and duration of the jets (007 was a fizzle but the B-jet still fired and
thus we could still get timing information from it). From then on, shots 010-023
used both gas jets.

Aside from shot 004, when channel 2 had a dead op-amp on the transimpedance
board, the DMBolo system seemed to be working well all day. There are lots of
data to analyze!


Lessons learned:
- Relative timing of gas jets to get same gas front arrival: for 55 bar plenum
  pressure, you want to trigger the F-port gas jet about 1.0 ms before the
  B-port gas jet. This seems to be reproducible to within about 0.1 ms.

- Gas jet duration to get same injected amount: this was figured from the torus
  pressure change when firing one gas jet or the other. For 55 bar plenum
  pressure, you want to use a duration of 1.25 ms for the B-port gas jet and 3.0
  ms for the F-port gas jet.

- With the double gas jet shots, it takes a long time to pump out the torus, and
  so the inter-shot delay is longer than in a normal run. We got started late -
  didn't take our first plasma shot until about 10:15 am (no MGI on this shot).
  First MGI shot was 004 at 10:30 am. Shots 004, 005, 006, 007, 008, 009 used a
  single gas jet. (007 was a fizzle but the B-jet still fired.) All shots from
  010 on used both gas jets. We took shot 023 at about 5:07 pm. So that is 14
  shots in about 6.5 hours.
 
- I think we can now say that mitigated disruption shots do NOT lead to fizzles
  on the next shot. This has been confirmed by this run as well as run 1090925.
  They do, however, delay the next shot because the torus has to be pumped down,
  as discussed above.


"Scorecard"
No-power shots           2  (shots 001, 002)

Fizzles, no MGI          0
Fizzles with MGI         1  (shot 007)

Plasma, no MGI           1  (shot 003)
Plasma, B port jet only  3  (shots 004, 008, 009)
Plasma, F port jet only  2  (shots 005, 006)
Plasma, both MGI jets    14 (shots 010-023)


Shot summaries
001  No plasma. Test of whether MGI system gate valves are automatically opening
     in the shot cycle (supposed to be at t = -3.0 s). Gas jets not
     fired on this shot. Gate valves worked as expected.

002  No plasma. Test of F-port gas valve interlocking and pressure transducer.
     Interlock failed so gas jet didn't fire.

003  Plasma, 1 MW ICRF but had lots of faults. No MGI gas jets (as expected -
     did not fire them). Rampdown disruption at t = 1.65 s.

004  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF successful. Successfully fired B-port gas jet at
     t = 1.000 s with duration 1.9 ms.

005  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF successful. Fired F-port gas jet at t = 1.000 s but not
     much gas made it through.

006  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF successful with no faults. Successfully fired F-port gas
     jet at t = 1.000 s. More gas made it through (about half what was injected
     through B-port jet on shot 004).

007  Fizzle. B-port gas jet only fired, with duration 1.4 ms (compare to shot
     004 when duration was 1.9 ms). Still got more gas through on this shot than
     we got from F-port jet on shot 6.

008  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF with no faults. B-port gas jet successfully fired. Short
     duration (1.1 ms). Not much gas made it through (torus pressure change 40
     mtorr).

009  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF with no faults. B-port gas jet only successfully fired.
     Duration 1.28 ms puts a sufficient amount of gas through.

010  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF with no faults. Both gas jets successfully fired, with
     F jet triggering 1.1 ms earlier than B jet in order to get the gas to hit
     the plasma edge at the same time.

011  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF with one fault, but was only off for a short time. Both
     gas jets fired successfully as in shot 010. Raised toroidal field to 5.6 T
     on this shot in order to pull FRCECE resonance layer locations out to the
     very edge of the plasma.

012  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF, no faults. Both gas jets fired successfully with timing
     such that the gas hits the plasma at the same time.

013  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF, no faults. Both MGI gas jets fired successfully. Timing
     was such that F jet hit the plasma 0.5 ms before B jet.

014  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF, no faults. Both MGI gas jets fired successfully. Timing
     was such that F jet hit the plasma 1.0 ms before B jet.

015  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF, no faults. Both MGI gas jets fired successfully. Timing
     was such that F jet hit the plasma about 1.5-1.6 ms before B jet.

016  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF, with one short fault. Both MGI gas jets fired
     successfully. Timing was such that the F jet hit the plasma about 0.35-0.5
     ms after the B jet. (We wanted it to hit 0.5 ms after.)

017  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF, no faults. Both MGI gas jets fired successfully. Timing
     was such that the F jet pressure transducer started to rise about 0.9-1.0
     ms later than the B jet pressure transducer. (Wanted 1.0 ms.)

018  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF, with some faults between 0.800 and 0.900 s. Wth steady
     when gas jets fire. Both MGI jets fired successfully. Timing was such that
     the F-jet hit the plasma about 1.4-1.5 ms after B-jet.

019  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF, no faults. Both MGI jets fired successfully. Timing was
     such that the F-jet hit the plasma about 2.0 ms after the B-jet did.

020  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF, no faults. Both MGI jets fired successfully. This was
     a repeat of shot 016 (F-jet hits plasma ~0.5 ms after B-jet).

021  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF, no faults. Both MGI jets fired successfully. This was
     a repeat of shot 013 (F-jet hits plasma ~0.5 ms before B-jet).

022  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF, with some faulting between 0.800 and 0.900 s. Wth steady
     when gas jets hit. Both gas jets fired successfully. Aimed to have F-jet
     hit plasma ~1.25 ms after B-jet.

023  Plasma. 1 MW ICRF, with no faults. Both MGI gas jets fired successfully.
     Aimed to have F-jet hit plasma ~1.25 ms before B-jet.

Entered: Feb 2 2012 09:23:28:500PM
Author: Robert Granetz

Session leader summary for Thursday 2012/02/02:

MP #675 -- Initial disruption mitigation experiments with two gas jets

Session leaders: G. Olynyk & R. Granetz
Physics operator: J. Irby

This run's primary goal is to look at the toroidal asymmetry of the
gas-jet-induced radiated power using two gas jets as a function of the
relative timing of the gas jet firings.  We got the hardware operational
during yesterday's maintenance day.  During a couple of no-plasma test
shots this morning, we confirmed that the B and F gate valves properly open
automatically when we go into PULSE state, but we also determined that the
PLC interlock hardware and/or logic is not working properly.  So after
shot 2, I bypassed the interlock box, and from then on the gas jet system
worked flawlessly.  We spent an hour or two firing a single gas jet per
shot to determine the proper durations to get roughly equal amounts of gas
into the torus, and to determine that the F gas jet fires about 1.1 ms
later than the B gas jet for the same start setting.  Using this
information, we then fired both gas jets on each shot, starting with shot
10.  We raised the toroidal field to 5.6 T on shot 11 in order to optimize
the plasma coverage of FRC ECE, and ran identical plasmas for the rest of
the day.  We spend most of the run doing a scan of relative starting times
for the two gas jets by varying F_START from about 1.5 ms before the
optimal ""simultaneous"" setting, to +2.1 ms after.  Analysis of the AXA and
AXJ arrays, and the DMBOLO signals will be done shortly to determine the
toroidal asymmetry for each of today's shots.  

See Geoff's SL summary for additional information.

Entered: Feb 3 2012 12:31:38:370AM
Author: Robert Granetz

Table of relative timing delay and corresponding shots
------------------------------------------------------
 Note: B_START = 1.0000s and F_START = 0.9989 s corresponds to
       a "relative" delay of 0.0 ms, i.e. this gives a pretty good
       simultaneous start on the pressure transducer signals.

    Relative delay               Shots
    --------------               -----
        -1.5 ms (F before B)      15
        -1.25                     23
        -1.0                      14
        -0.5                      13, 21
         0.0                      10, 11, 12
        +0.5                      16, 20
        +1.1                      17
        +1.25                     22
        +1.6                      18
        +2.1                      19

     B only (optimal duration)    09
     F only (optimal duration)    06
     B only (other durations)     04, 08
     F only (other durations)     05

     no gas jets                  03


Entered: Feb 3 2012 12:52:25:543AM
Author: Robert Granetz

I wrote a routine to plot the ratio AXA[19]/AXJ[10] (these two chords have
the same tangency radii, and look near the center).  If you look at the
ratio during the pre-TQ, there's an incredibly consistent dependence on the
relative timing of the two jets, in the direction that one would expect.  At
the extremes of the range of relative timings, the pre-TQ ratios match the
corresponding single-jet results...absolutely phenominal result.  I need to 
decide how to distill the ratio vs time during the pre-TQ into a single number
for each shot, so I can make a simple plot vs relative timing.  It's good news
for ITER.

Physics Operator Summaries

Session Leader Comments
Feb 2 2012 09:28:20:343PMRobert Granetz

I hooked up the F pressure transducer signal to channel 2 of the
ORNL amplifier box.  (At least, I'm hoping it's a 2nd channel.)

Feb 2 2012 09:28:44:947PMRobert Granetz

I filled both B and F plena to 55 bar with a mixture of 85% He / 15% Ar

Feb 3 2012 12:28:29:220AMRobert Granetz

Table of relative timing delay and corresponding shots
------------------------------------------------------
 Note: B_START = 1.0000s and F_START = 0.9989 s corresponds to
       a "relative" delay of 0.0 ms, i.e. this gives a pretty good
       simultaneous start on the pressure transducer signals.

    Relative delay               Shots
    --------------               -----
        -1.5 ms (F before B)      15
        -1.25                     23
        -1.0                      14
        -0.5                      13, 21
         0.0                      10, 11, 12
        +0.5                      16, 20
        +1.1                      17
        +1.25                     22
        +1.6                      18
        +2.1                      19

     B only (optimal duration)    09
     F only (optimal duration)    06
     B only (other durations)     04, 08
     F only (other durations)     05

     no gas jets                  03


Feb 3 2012 12:53:43:990AMRobert Granetz

I wrote a routine to plot the ratio AXA[19]/AXJ[10] (these two chords have
the same tangency radii, and look near the center).  If you look at the
ratio during the pre-TQ, there's an incredibly consistent dependence on the
relative timing of the two jets, in the direction that one would expect.  At
the extremes of the range of relative timings, the pre-TQ ratios match the
corresponding single-jet results...absolutely phenominal result.  I need to
decide how to distill the ratio vs time during the pre-TQ into a single number
for each shot, so I can make a simple plot vs relative timing.  It's good news
for ITER.

Feb 7 2012 02:14:45:327PMGeoff OlynykI have defined and retrieved several key times for the disruptions in today's
run. NOTE! Shot 007 (the fizzle) is not included in this list.
Only the 19 plasmas that have gas jets are included.

Also note that there is no entry for the F-jet pressure rise on shot 005, or the
B-jet pressure rise on shot 008, because these MGI shots had very small amounts
of gas making it through the valve; not enough to cause a significant pressure
rise on the transducer and get the timing. So these ones are in there as NaN.

Definitions:

1. BTrig - Start of rise on TTL waveform to B-jet [s]
2. FTrig - Start of rise on TTL waveform to F-jet [s]

3. BDur - Duration of TTL pulse to B-jet [ms]
4. FDur - Duration of TTL pulse to F-jet [ms]

5. BPres - Start of rise of pressure transducer waveform for B-jet [s]
6. FPres - Start of rise of pressure transducer waveform for F-jet [s]

7. tStag = (FPres - BPres)*1.e3 - This is the stagger time between the two gas
jets, as defined by their pressure waveforms. Plot vs. this when plotting
things like integrated radiation asymmetry. [ms]

8. gEdge - Time when DMBolo average signal rises from 0, indicating presence of
significant impurities in plasma. [s]
9. TQ_dm - Time when DMBolo average emissivity signal starts to sharply rise,
indicating that the thermal quench event has started. [s]
10. TQ_end - Time at which the DMBolo average emissivity signal reaches a
local minimum before rising again during the CQ. This is typically
~0.2-0.4 ms before the peak in the plasma current waveform. [s]

11. TQ_SXR - Time at which the core SXR (XTomo array 3 chord 19) has fallen to
half its peak value. [s]
12. CQ - Peak in plasma current as measured by Rogowski coil (the 10 kHz signal
stored in the HYBRID tree) [s]

OK, here comes the table, as comma-separated values:
"SHOT","BTrig","FTrig","BDur","FDur","BPres","FPres","tStag","gEdge","TQ_dm","TQ_end","TQ_SXR","CQ"
1120202004,1.00000,"NaN",1.90,"NaN",1.00162,"NaN","NaN",1.00299,1.00406,1.00469,1.00452,1.00490
1120202005,"NaN",1.00000,"NaN",1.90,"NaN","NaN","NaN",1.00471,1.00683,1.00735,1.00729,1.00763
1120202006,"NaN",1.00000,"NaN",3.00,"NaN",1.00284,"NaN",1.00399,1.00536,1.00592,1.00582,1.00619
1120202008,1.00000,"NaN",1.10,"NaN","NaN","NaN","NaN",1.00317,1.00426,1.00485,1.00471,1.00508
1120202009,1.00000,"NaN",1.28,"NaN",1.00162,"NaN","NaN",1.00300,1.00411,1.00467,1.00462,1.00490
1120202010,1.00000,0.99890,1.28,3.00,1.00159,1.00144,-0.15,1.00283,1.00401,1.00438,1.00446,1.00470
1120202011,1.00000,0.99890,1.28,3.00,1.00164,1.00130,-0.34,1.00240,1.00398,1.00436,1.00442,1.00470
1120202012,1.00000,0.99890,1.28,3.00,1.00160,1.00156,-0.04,1.00252,1.00399,1.00439,1.00442,1.00469
1120202013,1.00000,0.99840,1.28,3.00,1.00163,1.00103,-0.60,1.00200,1.00365,1.00409,1.00410,1.00440
1120202014,1.00000,0.99790,1.28,3.00,1.00166,1.00050,-1.16,1.00140,1.00306,1.00367,1.00355,1.00394
1120202015,1.00000,0.99740,1.28,3.00,1.00166,0.99998,-1.68,1.00090,1.00265,1.00324,1.00308,1.00341
1120202016,1.00000,0.99940,1.28,3.00,1.00162,1.00195,0.33,1.00298,1.00406,1.00454,1.00450,1.00480
1120202017,1.00000,1.00000,1.28,3.00,1.00166,1.00252,0.86,1.00303,1.00415,1.00453,1.00461,1.00490
1120202018,1.00000,1.00050,1.28,3.00,1.00162,1.00299,1.37,1.00296,1.00416,1.00453,1.00464,1.00490
1120202019,1.00000,1.00100,1.28,3.00,1.00163,1.00347,1.84,1.00294,1.00416,1.00462,1.00469,1.00491
1120202020,1.00000,0.99940,1.28,3.00,1.00166,1.00192,0.26,1.00291,1.00407,1.00447,1.00452,1.00480
1120202021,1.00000,0.99840,1.28,3.00,1.00164,1.00081,-0.83,1.00180,1.00354,1.00400,1.00399,1.00430
1120202022,1.00000,1.00015,1.28,3.00,1.00164,1.00276,1.12,1.00290,1.00428,1.00476,1.00465,1.00501
1120202023,1.00000,0.99765,1.28,3.00,1.00162,1.00017,-1.45,1.00100,1.00282,1.00336,1.00327,1.00360


It can also be found in worksheet 'events' of the following spreadsheet:
/home/golynyk/mpdata/mp675/gas_jet_timing.ods

Or all of them can be loaded into memory in IDL by running the following two
IDL scripts, in order (run scripts using .r program_name.pro)

1. /home/golynyk/mpdata/mp675/idl/mp675_load.pro
(This takes a while to run because it's loading 19x6 = 114 DMBolo signals)
2. /home/golynyk/mpdata/mp675/idl/mp675_anal.pro
Oct 1 2012 06:29:52:097PMGeoff OlynykHere is a chart showing the stagger time scan from today. Note we assume a 0.790 ms relative delay (that is, if you fire them at the same time, the F-jet arrives at the plasma edge 0.79 ms after the B-jet).

shot         nebar   Wth    t_stag   Other notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
1120202006   1.55     52    F only   Normal field, LSN, L-mode
1120202015   1.61     43    -1.81    Normal field, LSN, L-mode
1120202023   1.58     50    -1.56    Normal field, LSN, L-mode
1120202014   1.56     48    -1.31    Normal field, LSN, L-mode
1120202013   1.56     48    -0.81    Normal field, LSN, L-mode
1120202021   1.56     49    -0.81    Normal field, LSN, L-mode
1120202010   1.58     52    -0.31    Normal field, LSN, L-mode
1120202011   1.55     45    -0.31    Normal field, LSN, L-mode
1120202012   1.56     48    -0.31    Normal field, LSN, L-mode
1120202016   1.59     46    +0.19    Normal field, LSN, L-mode
1120202020   1.58     51    +0.19    Normal field, LSN, L-mode
1120202017   1.57     48    +0.79    Normal field, LSN, L-mode
1120202022   1.59     48    +0.94    Normal field, LSN, L-mode
1120202018   1.57     52    +1.29    Normal field, LSN, L-mode
1120202019    ---     50    +1.79    Normal field, LSN, L-mode
1120202009   1.56     47    B only   Normal field, LSN, L-mode

Feb 2 2012 08:52:55:720AM1120202001Geoff OlynykI'm told the alternator is delayed spinning up and the start of the run is delayed 1 hour. We are planning to use this time do no-plasma shots to test the TORVAC (and other) interlocking on the gas jet system.

Both gas jet plenums are loaded with 85% He, 15% Ar at 55 bar.

Normal pressure for the MGI system is 70 bar but according to Oak Ridge, the new (F-port) gas valve apparently is having problems opening at that pressure. (No 100,000-mile powertrain warranty on these valves.) We are going to start at 55 bar and possibly increase to 60 bar later.
Feb 2 2012 09:18:26:587AM1120202001Geoff OlynykShot 001 will be a test of the gate valves on the MGI system only. They are supposed to open at t = -3.0 s in the shot cycle. We will have both gate valves (B and F) open but will not be firing the gas jets on this one.

Result: Both gate valves successfully opened. Gas jets did not fire (as expected).

Next shot: No plasma; full test of F-port gas jet.
Feb 2 2012 09:29:20:477PM1120202001Robert Granetz

Shot 01 - No-plasma shot to test whether both gas jet gate valves open
          automatically during the PULSE state.  I'll check this by watching
          the RSView status.  I will NOT fire the fast valves for this test.

Feb 2 2012 09:29:56:647PM1120202001Robert Granetz

Shot 01 - Both gas jet gate valves opened automatically in PULSE state.
          So far, so good.

Next shot: Try firing just the F gas jet to test that everything works with
           all the interlocks involved, and also to see if the fast pressure
           transducer signal works.  The start of the fizzle detector will
           be set at t=1.2 s so it doesn't confuse us.

Feb 2 2012 10:12:09:667AM1120202002Geoff OlynykShot 002
-----------------------------

Plan: This will be a no-plasma test of the F-port (new) gas jet. Two things are being tested here: (1) The TORVAC interlock on the gas jet chassis, and (2) Whether the pressure transducer for F-port valve is being amplified. (Granetz hooked up the F-port gas valve pressure transducer to what we think is another amplifier channel on our lone Oak Ridge pressure transducer amplifier, but we're not sure whether it will actually work.)

If the gas jet does not fire because of some problem with getting a permissive from the gas jet interlock, we will disable the interlock on the gas jet system. This has been the case in past years.

Moving the fizzle detector start time to 1.2 s so that the gas jet system gets a permissive from the fizzle detector despite not having any plasma on this shot. ~30 minute delay while EngOps and IT support troubleshoot a problem with changing the fizzle detector start time.

Result: F-port gas jet did not fire. Triggering worked (TTL drive from trigger to interlock box shows on scope) but no voltage on output from gas jet chassis (power supply). So this means that either the interlock box never went permissive, or the power supply failed. The power supply was working last night, so we assume that it was the interlocking that failed.

Took a cell access and bypassed the interlocking on the gas jet. Also having Maria Silveira make two more BNC-to-2pinLEMO cables so that we can digitize the output of the interlock box, and in future we can know whether problems are with the interlocking or the gas jet chassis (power supply).

Next shot: Attempt plasma with RF heating; no gas jet. Use this shot to check out the plasma and RF after a maintenance day (no plasma since Tuesday 2012-01-31) and for background for our diagnostics. Fizzle detector turn-on has been restored to 0.080 s since MGI system is now bypassing the interlock anyway.
Feb 2 2012 09:30:31:553PM1120202002Robert Granetz

Shot 02 - Gas jet didn't fire.  So we're going to have to have a cell access in
          order to bypass the interlock box. 

Feb 2 2012 10:24:23:430AM1120202003Geoff OlynykShot 003
-----------------------------

Plan: Attempt plasma with RF heating from t=0.800 s. Do not fire gas jets.

Result: RF on at t=0.800 s as requested. 1 MW from E antenna. Lots of faults. Density request was erroneously low (nl04 = 0.6e20); will up for next shot. Went into H-mode at about 0.98 s (we think this is because of the low density), came out again when RF turns off at t=1.1 s. Disruption early in rampdown at about 1.6465 s.

Next shot: Up density to nl04=1.0e20 m-3. Same RF heating. Fire B-port gas jet at t=1.000 s for duration of 1.9 ms.
Feb 2 2012 09:31:43:020PM1120202003Robert Granetz

Shot 03 - This will be the first plasma shot, and NO gas jets.  Note that the
          gas jet signals are bypassing the interlock box.

Feb 2 2012 09:58:43:220PM1120202003Robert Granetz

Shot 03 - Plasma, pretty good, but disrupted in rampdown.  1 MW RF with faults.
          We got an ELMfree H-mode starting at t=1.0 s, perhaps because the
          density was too low.

Next shot: fire B gas jet at 1.0 s for 1.9 ms

Feb 2 2012 10:36:35:270AM1120202004Geoff OlynykShot 004
-----------------------------

Plan: Plasma with RF, fire B-port gas jet only at t=1.000 s.

Result: RF worked perfectly; plasma stayed in L-mode. B-port gas jet fired as expected.

Next shot: Plasma with RF, fire F-port gas jet only at t=1.000 s.
Feb 2 2012 09:32:10:510PM1120202004Robert Granetz

Shot 04 - Plasma.  Disrupted at t=1.005 s due to B gas jet at t=1.000 s.
          delta_P = 9 bar
          1.0 MA, 5.4 T, 1.0e20 m-2, LSN, Prf=1 MW, L-mode.

Next shot: Fire F gas jet (only) at t=1.0 s for 1.9 ms.

Feb 2 2012 11:10:04:167AM1120202005Geoff OlynykShot 005
-----------------------------

Plan: Plasma with RF, fire F-port gas jet only at t=1.000 s.

Result: Plasma with RF. F-port gas jet fired at t=1.000 s but not, er, massively enough. Got a disruption but it wasn't mitigated very well - triggered a downward VDE.

F-port gas jet pressure transducer is not being amplified. (Whatever it was that we plugged the BNCs into on that ORNL pressure transducer amplifier, it wasn't a second amplifier channel!)

Next shot: Same thing, fire F-port MGI jet again. Up the duration of the F-port MGI jet to 3.0 ms (from current 1.9 ms).
Feb 2 2012 09:33:22:437PM1120202005Robert Granetz

Shot 05 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.007 s due to F gas jet at t=1.0 s for 1.9 ms,
          but there wasn't very much gas injected.

Next shot: 

Feb 2 2012 09:56:39:397PM1120202005Robert Granetz

For next shot increase F gas jet duration to 3 ms.  Fire F gas jet only.
Refill plenum prior to next shot.

Feb 2 2012 11:38:14:440AM1120202006Geoff OlynykShot 006
-----------------------------

Plan: Same plasma as before. Fire F-port gas jet only at t=1.000 s, but with increased duration (3.0 ms instead of 1.9 ms).

Result: Plasma with no RF faults. Much more successful. Got more gas in this time.

Next shot: Same plasma. Fire B-port gas jet only at t = 1.000 s, with duration shortened to 1.4 ms.
Feb 2 2012 09:33:52:017PM1120202006Robert Granetz

Shot 06 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.006 s due to F gas jet.  We got much more
          gas with this 3 ms pulse, and the F fast pressure transducer is
          is working nicely.  The z-centroid went down more than shot 4 (B gas
          jet), but not as far as shot 5 (F gas jet).  Pressure drop in
          F plenum is too noisy to get a useful measurement. 

Feb 2 2012 11:50:31:763AM1120202007Geoff OlynykShot 007
-----------------------------

Plan: Same plasma as before. Fire B-port gas jet only at t=1.000 s, but with decreased duration from shot 004 (1.4 ms instead of 1.9 ms).

Result: Fizzle. B-port gas jet still fired. Still got more gas than F-port gas jet had put in on shot 6.

Next shot: Same plasma. Fire B-port gas jet only at t = 1.000 s. Reduce duration of gas jet to 1.1 ms from 1.4 ms.
Feb 2 2012 09:34:56:597PM1120202007Robert Granetz

Shot 07 - Fire B gas jet, but with a duration of 1.4 ms to see if we can
          match the lower amount of gas that the F gas jet injects.
          Both plena have been refilled to 55 bar before the shot.

Feb 2 2012 09:57:32:590PM1120202007Robert Granetz

Shot 07 - Fizzle.  B gas jet fired for 1.4 ms, and torus pressure was
          still much more than the F gas jet for 3 ms

Next shot: decrease B pulse duration to 1.1 ms; replenish B plenum before shot

Feb 2 2012 12:17:14:703PM1120202008Geoff OlynykShot 008
-----------------------------

Plan: Same plasma as before. Fire B-port gas jet only, at t = 1.000 s, but with decreased duration from shot 007 (1.1 ms instead of 1.4 ms).

Result: Plasma with RF, no faults. B port jet fired as expected. Not much gas made it through (torus pressure change only ~ 40 mtorr).

Next shot: Same plasma, B jet only. Increase duration to 1.28 ms. Want to get torus pressure change of about 150 mtorr from B jet, in order to match F jet with pulse duration 3.0 ms. Cell access before shot 009 in order for diagnosticians who are not me or Granetz to tweak things.
Feb 2 2012 09:38:17:900PM1120202008Robert Granetz

Shot 08 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.005 s due to B gas jet, which fired at
          t=1.0 s for 1.1 ms.  Much, much less gas was injected on this shot.
          So we've bracketed the B durations to between 1.1 and 1.4 ms in order
          to match 3 ms on the F gas jet.

Next shot: fire B gas jet only, for a duration of 1.28 ms.  Refill plena
           before shot.

Feb 2 2012 12:32:10:850PM1120202009Geoff OlynykShot 009
-----------------------------

Plan: Same plasma as before. Fire B-port gas jet only, at t = 1.000 s, but with increased duration from shot 008 (1.28 ms instead of 1.1 ms). Attempting to get torus pressure change of about 150 mtorr from B jet in order to match F jet with 3.0 ms duration.

Result: Plasma, RF heating with no faults. B jet fired as expected.

Next shot: Fire both jets. Set duration on B jet to 1.28 ms, and on F jet to 3.0 ms. Fire F jet 1.1 ms earlier than B jet in an attempt to get them to hit at the same time.
Feb 2 2012 09:38:51:030PM1120202009Robert Granetz

Shot 09 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.005 ms due to B gas jet with a duration
          of 1.28 ms.  delta_P is about 5 bar in plenum.

Feb 2 2012 12:55:21:680PM1120202010Geoff OlynykShot 010
-----------------------------

Plan: Same plasma as before. Fire both gas jets.

Duration:
B jet 1.28 ms
F jet 3.00 ms

Trigger time:
B jet 1.0000 s
F jet 0.9989 s (= 1.0000 s - 1.1 ms)

Result: Plasma and RF good. Both gas jets fired, pressure transducer signals show them leaving the valves at the same time! (To within 0.1 ms anyway.)

Next shot: Repeat, identical plasma RF, and gas jet settings. Turn toroidal field up to 5.6 T in order to get FRCECE data right out to the edge.
Feb 2 2012 09:39:19:803PM1120202010Robert Granetz

Shot 10 - Fire both gas jets:
           B start = 1.0000 s
           B duration = 1.28 ms
           F start = 0.9989 s (1.1 ms before B)
           F duration = 3.00 ms
          Refill both plena prior to shot 

Feb 2 2012 09:39:50:600PM1120202010Robert Granetz

Shot 10 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.0045 s; both gas jets fired, with timings
          specified in my previous logbook entry.  The fast pressure transducers
          show that we did a good job of matching the relative amounts and
          timings.

Next shot: repeat, no changes; refill plena prior to shot

Feb 2 2012 01:24:48:690PM1120202011Geoff OlynykShot 011
-----------------------------

Plan: Same plasma current, density, and heating as shot 010. Fire both gas jets as in shot 010.

FRCECE right now is seeing out to r/a of about 0.9 only. Since we want to use that diagnostic to look at the inward movement of the pre-TQ cooling front, we need to up the toroidal field slightly in order to bring the resonance layers out in radial location. So upping toroidal field to 5.6 T for this shot, and all subsequent shots today.

Gas jet trigger time:
B jet 1.0000 s
F jet 0.9989 s (= 1.0000 s - 1.1 ms)

Gas jet duration:
B jet 1.28 ms
F jet 3.00 ms

Result: Plasma, with one RF trip at about 0.86 s. Came back on quickly. Wth was steady at time of disruption. Both gas jets fired successfully.

Next shot: Change toroidal field to 5.6 T. Otherwise same settings. Keep same plasma and heating settings. Same gas jet duration and timing.
Feb 2 2012 09:40:32:013PM1120202011Robert Granetz

Shot 11 - At Amanda's suggestion, we'll raise Btor to 5.6 T for the rest
          of the run.  This is to enable the FRC ECE to give profiles all
          the way to the plasma edge.  This is important because Amanda will
          be keeping the GPC gate valve closed for the rest of the day, and
          also because the FRC ECE has good time resolution.

Feb 2 2012 09:41:03:660PM1120202011Robert Granetz

Shot 11 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.0045 s.  Both gas jets fired with the
          same timings as the previous shot.  The B-field was supposed to
          be increased to 5.6 T, but Jim forgot to load into the tree.

Next shot: repeat with Btor=5.6 T

Feb 2 2012 09:41:33:747PM1120202011Robert Granetz

Shot 11 - Actually, Jim did load the Btor change.  This shot has Btor=5.6 T,
          as desired. 

Feb 2 2012 01:28:27:400PM1120202012Geoff OlynykShot 012
-----------------------------

Plan: Same plasma current, density, field, and heating as shot 011. Fire both gas jets as in shot 011. Toroidal field at 5.6 T.

Gas jet trigger time:
B jet 1.0000 s
F jet 0.9989 s (= 1.0000 s - 1.1 ms)

Gas jet duration:
B jet 1.28 ms
F jet 3.00 ms

Result: Plasma. RF 1 MW; no faults. Both gas jets fired successfully.

Next shot: Same plasma and heating. Same gas jet duration. Start scan of gas jet staggering time: move F-port jet 0.5 ms earlier.
Feb 2 2012 09:42:03:513PM1120202012Robert Granetz

Shot 12 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.0045 s; both gas jets fired with same
          timings as previous few shots.  Btor=5.6 T.  Plena pressures
          are dropping by about 5-6 bar on all of these shots.

Next shot: move start time of F gas jet by -0.5 ms, i.e. 0.5 ms earlier
           than shot 12.  (F_START = 0.9984 s)

Feb 2 2012 01:48:32:450PM1120202013Geoff OlynykShot 013
-----------------------------

Plan: Same plasma and heating as shot 012. Fire both gas jets, with F-jet firing 0.5 ms earlier than the "hits plasma at the same time" time.

Gas jet trigger time:
B jet 1.0000 s
F jet 0.9984 s (= 1.0000 s - 1.1 ms - 0.5 ms)

Gas jet duration:
B jet 1.28 ms
F jet 3.00 ms

Result: Success. Plasma, RF, gas jets worked as expected.

Next shot: Move F jet 0.5 ms earlier than on this shot.
Feb 2 2012 09:42:36:323PM1120202013Robert Granetz

Shot 13 - Both gas jets are firing with the following timings:
           B_START = 1.0000 s
           B_DURATION = 0.00128 s
           F_START = 0.9984 s
           F_DURATION = 0.0030 s
          Both plena were refilled prior to the shot 

Feb 2 2012 09:43:08:900PM1120202013Robert Granetz

Shot 13 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.004 s; two gas jets with timing as specified
          in my preceding logbook entry.

Next shot: move F gas jet another 0.5 ms earlier, i.e. F_START = 0.9979 s

Feb 2 2012 02:05:35:130PM1120202014Geoff OlynykShot 014
-----------------------------

Plan: Same plasma and heating as shot 013. Fire both gas jets, with F-jet firing 1.0 ms earlier than the "hits plasma at the same time" time.

Gas jet trigger time:
B jet 1.0000 s
F jet 0.9979 s (= 1.0000 s - 1.1 ms - 1.0 ms)

Gas jet duration:
B jet 1.28 ms
F jet 3.00 ms

Result: Plasma. RF, no faults. Gas jets fired as expected.

Next shot: Advance F-port gas jet (earlier) by another 0.5 ms.
Feb 2 2012 09:43:48:980PM1120202014Robert Granetz

Shot 14 - Gas jet timings:
           B_START = 1.0000 s
           B_DURATION = 0.00128 s
           F_START = 0.9979 s
           F_DURATION = 0.0030 s
          Both plena were refilled to 55 bar prior to the shot.
Next shot: 

Feb 2 2012 09:44:15:153PM1120202014Robert Granetz

Shot 14 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.004 s; two gas jets with timings specified in
          my preceding logbook entry

Next shot: move F gas jet another 0.5 ms earlier, i.e. F_START = 0.9974 s

Feb 2 2012 02:29:51:997PM1120202015Geoff OlynykShot 015
-----------------------------

Plan: Same plasma and heating as shot 014. Fire both gas jets, with F-jet firing 1.5 ms earlier than the "hits plasma at the same time" time.

Gas jet trigger time:
B jet 1.0000 s
F jet 0.9974 s (= 1.0000 s - 1.1 ms - 1.5 ms)

Gas jet duration:
B jet 1.28 ms
F jet 3.00 ms

Result: Plasma. RF, 1 MW, no faults. Both jets fired successfully. F jet pressure rise started about 1.6 ms before B jet pressure rise (not 1.5 ms as desired).

Next shot: Same plasma and heating. Fire both jets, this time with the F jet set to arrive at the plasma 0.5 ms AFTER the B jet.
Feb 2 2012 09:44:43:580PM1120202015Robert Granetz

Shot 15 - Gas jet timings:
           B_START = 1.0000 s
           B_DURATION = 0.00128 s
           F_START = 0.9974 s
           F_DURATION = 0.0030 s
          Both plena were refilled to 54 bar prior to this shot.

Feb 2 2012 09:45:53:990PM1120202015Robert Granetz

Shot 15 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.003 s; two gas jets with timing as specified
          in previous logbook entry

Next shot: move F gas jet start by +2.0 ms (F_START = 0.9994 s), i.e. 0.5 ms
           later than the optimal value to match the B gas jet.

Feb 2 2012 02:59:55:667PM1120202016Geoff OlynykShot 016
-----------------------------

Plan: Same plasma and heating as shot 015. Fire both gas jets, with F-jet firing 0.5 ms later than the "hits plasma at the same time" time.

Gas jet trigger time:
B jet 1.0000 s
F jet 0.9994 s (= 1.0000 s - 1.1 ms + 0.5 ms)

Gas jet duration:
B jet 1.28 ms
F jet 3.00 ms

Result: Plasma. RF tripped briefly once again. Both gas jets fired correctly. Note that the F jet pressure transducer started rising about 0.35-0.40 ms after B jet pressure transducer, not 0.50 ms as desired. Looking back, we may have had our original timing off by ~0.10 ms. From now on, adjust relative timing to 1.0 ms advance on F (instead of 1.1 ms).

Next shot: Make F-jet 0.6 ms later than this shot.
Feb 2 2012 09:45:19:160PM1120202016Robert Granetz

Shot 16 - Gas jet timings:
           B_START = 1.0000 s
           B_DURATION = 0.00128 s
           F_START = 0.9994 s
           F_DURATION = 0.0030 s
          Both plena were filled to 54 bar prior to this shot.

Feb 2 2012 09:46:34:993PM1120202016Robert Granetz

Shot 16 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.0045 s; two gas jets with timing as specified
          in preceding logbook entry

Next shot: move F gas jet start time by +0.6 ms, i.e. F_START = 1.0000 s

Feb 2 2012 03:11:15:110PM1120202017Geoff OlynykShot 017
-----------------------------

Plan: Same plasma and heating as shot 016. Fire both gas jets, with F-jet firing 1.0 ms later than the "hits plasma at the same time" time. Note that the "hits plasma at the same time" time has been adjusted to mean "F jet earlier than B jet by 1.0 ms".

This may be confusing. Later when analyzing data, we will get the actual trigger times and pressure transducer start-of-rise (break-in-slope) times.

Gas jet trigger time:
B jet 1.0000 s
F jet 1.0000 s (= 1.0000 s - 1.0 ms + 1.0 ms)

Gas jet duration:
B jet 1.28 ms
F jet 3.00 ms

Result: Plasma. 1 MW ICRF, no faults. Both gas jets fired successfully. TQ occurs at the same time as in shot 016, indicating that the B-jet (the one that is injected first) is what is triggering the TQ. This is not surprising.

Next shot: Same plasma and heating. Fire both gas jets. Delay F-port jet by 0.5 ms relative to this shot.
Feb 2 2012 09:47:21:380PM1120202017Robert Granetz

Shot 17 - Gas jet timings:
            B_START = 1.0000 s
            B_DURATION = 0.00128 s
            F_START = 1.0000 s
            F_DURATION = 0.0030 s
          Both plena were refilled prior to this shot. 

Feb 2 2012 09:47:45:197PM1120202017Robert Granetz

Shot 17 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.0045 s; two gas jets with timing specified in
          my previous logbook entry.

Next shot: move F gas jet start time by another +0.5 ms (F_START = 1.0005 s)

Feb 2 2012 03:32:34:853PM1120202018Geoff OlynykShot 018
-----------------------------

Plan: Same plasma and heating as shot 017. Fire both gas jets, with F-jet firing 1.5 ms later than the "hits plasma at the same time" time.

Gas jet trigger time:
B jet 1.0000 s
F jet 1.0005 s (= 1.0000 s - 1.0 ms + 1.5 ms)

Gas jet duration:
B jet 1.28 ms
F jet 3.00 ms

Result: Plasma. 1 MW RF with a few faults between 0.8 and 0.9 s. Wth seems to be steady, though.

Next shot: Same plasma and heating. Fire both gas jets. Delay F-jet by another 0.5 ms.
Feb 2 2012 09:48:12:257PM1120202018Robert Granetz

Shot 18 - Gas jet timings:
            B_START = 1.0000 s
            B_DURATION = 0.00128 s
            F_START = 1.0005 s
            F_DURATION = 0.0030 s
          Both plena were refilled prior to this shot.

Feb 2 2012 09:49:08:897PM1120202018Robert Granetz

Shot 18 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.0045 s; both gas jets fired; timing as
          specified in previous logbook entry for this shot

Next shot: move F gas jet start time by another +0.5 ms (F_START = 1.0010 s)

Feb 2 2012 04:03:47:787PM1120202019Geoff OlynykShot 019
-----------------------------

Plan: Same plasma and heating as shot 018. Fire both gas jets, with F-jet firing 2.0 ms later than the "hits plasma at the same time" time.

Gas jet trigger time:
B jet 1.0000 s
F jet 1.0010 s (= 1.0000 s - 1.0 ms + 2.0 ms)

Gas jet duration:
B jet 1.28 ms
F jet 3.00 ms

Result: Plasma. RF, no faults. Both jets fired successfully with timing as expected. nl04 signal on bigboard (display at front of control room) drops to zero at aobut t=0.1 s.

Next shot: Repeat shot 016 exactly.
Feb 2 2012 09:49:36:103PM1120202019Robert Granetz

Shot 19 - gas jet timings:
            B_START = 1.0000 s
            B_DURATION = 0.00128 s
            F_START = 1.0010 s
            F_DURATION = 0.0030 s
          Both plena were refilled prior to this shot. 

Feb 2 2012 09:50:01:733PM1120202019Robert Granetz

Shot 19 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.0045 s; both gas jets fired
          See previous entry for timings for this shot

Next shot: start scan back in opposite direction; F_START = 0.9994 s

Feb 2 2012 04:13:05:327PM1120202020Geoff OlynykShot 020
-----------------------------

Plan: Repeat of shot 016. Same plasma and heating as shot 016. Same gas jet setup as shot 016. (That is, fire both gas jets, with F-jet firing approximately 0.4 ms later than the "hits plasma at the same time" time.)

Gas jet trigger time:
B jet 1.0000 s
F jet 0.9994 s (= 1.0000 s - 1.0 ms + 0.4 ms)

Gas jet duration:
B jet 1.28 ms
F jet 3.00 ms

Result: Plasma. RF. B-jet. F-jet. All were functioning as they are supposed to.

Next shot: Repeat shot 013.
Feb 2 2012 09:50:34:330PM1120202020Robert Granetz

Shot 20 - gas jet timings for this shot:
            B_START = 1.0000 s
            B_DURATION = 0.00128 s
            F_START = 0.9994 s
            F_DURATION = 0.0030 s
          Both plena were refilled prior to this shot.

Feb 2 2012 09:51:00:537PM1120202020Robert Granetz

Shot 20 - Plasma disrupted at 1.0045 s; two gas jets; timings as per my other
          logbook entry for this shot

Next shot: set F_START = 0.9984 s

Feb 2 2012 04:16:56:263PM1120202021Geoff OlynykJust as a general note, today would be a great day for people looking to get statistics about the variability of their diagnostic in identical plasmas.
Feb 2 2012 04:30:57:607PM1120202021Geoff OlynykShot 021
-----------------------------

Plan: Repeat of shot 013. Same plasma and heating as shot 013. Same gas jet setup as shot 013. (That is, fire both gas jets, with F-jet firing approximately 0.6 ms earlier than the "hits plasma at the same time" time.)

Gas jet trigger time:
B jet 1.0000 s
F jet 0.9984 s (= 1.0000 s - 1.0 ms - 0.6 ms)

Gas jet duration:
B jet 1.28 ms
F jet 3.00 ms

Result: Plasma. RF, 1.0 MW, no faults. Both gas jets worked as expected.

Next shot: Fire F-jet 1.25 ms after B-jet.
Feb 2 2012 09:51:25:170PM1120202021Robert Granetz

Shot 21 - gas jet timings for this shot:
            B_START = 1.0000 s
            B_DURATION = 0.00128 s
            F_START = 0.9984 s
            F_DURATION = 0.0030 s
          Both plena were refilled to 54 bar prior to this shot .

Feb 2 2012 10:00:29:433PM1120202021Robert Granetz

Shot 21 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.004 s; two gas jets; timings specified in
          my other entry for this shot

Next shot: F_START = 1.00015 s

Feb 2 2012 04:52:48:287PM1120202022Geoff OlynykShot 022
-----------------------------

Plan: Plasma and heating same as the last several shots. Fire both gas jets, with F-jet approximately 1.15 ms after B-jet.

Gas jet trigger time:
B jet 1.00000 s
F jet 1.00015 s (= 1.0000 s - 1.0 ms + 1.15 ms)

Gas jet duration:
B jet 1.28 ms
F jet 3.00 ms

Result: Plasma. RF, 1 MW with some faults. Both gas jets fired successfully as requested.

Next shot: Fire F-jet about 1.25-1.35 ms before B-jet.
Feb 2 2012 09:35:45:420PM1120202022Robert Granetz

Shot 22 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.0045 s; two gas jets
            B_START = 1.0000 s
            B_DURATION = 0.00128 s
            F_START = 1.00015 (+1.25 ms from optimally simultaneous)
            F_DURATION = 0.0030 s
          Both plena were refilled to 54 bar prior to this shot.

Next shot: F_START = 0.99765
           (This will be the last shot of today's run.)

Feb 2 2012 05:12:24:383PM1120202023Geoff OlynykShot 023
-----------------------------

Plan: Plasma and heating same as the last several shots. Fire both gas jets, with F-jet approximately 1.35 ms before B-jet.

Gas jet trigger time:
B jet 1.00000 s
F jet 0.99765 s (= 1.0000 s - 1.0 ms - 1.35 ms)

Gas jet duration:
B jet 1.28 ms
F jet 3.00 ms

This will be the last shot for today's run. Thank you to the staff for staying slightly late to accommodate this shot.

Result: Plasma. 1 MW ICRF, no faults. Gas jet worked as requested.
Feb 2 2012 09:36:11:080PM1120202023Robert Granetz

Shot 23 - Plasma, disrupted at t=1.0035 s; two gas jets
            B_START = 1.0000 s
            B_DURATION = 0.00128 s
            F_START = 0.99765 s
            F_DURATION = 0.0030 s
          Both plena were refilled to 54 bar prior to this shot.

End of run 

Physics Operator Comments
Feb 2 2012 08:36:29:380AMJim IrbyOne hour delay in run start for alternator
Feb 2 2012 09:21:20:397AM1120202001Jim IrbyLoaded from 1120117015 --- seg 1 and seg 2 are on
prepuff 17 ms
pg3 100% at -20 ms
ef4 -1310 A
RXL 0.005 m

Argon enabled for first shot: 1 psi, 375 ms

RXL from 0.005 m to -0.005 m
loaded -- open tree done


**********************************
1 hour delay in alternator
**********************************

Use time to continue testing of MGJs.


------------------------------------

no main gas on this shot --- give it a good hit on the next shots

Feb 2 2012 10:03:32:547AM1120202002Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

pg3 from -56 to -1 ms at 100%

fizzle start to 1.2 s
turned off seg 2 to keep nl_04 feedback from adding even more gas
open tree done

results --------------------------------

looks like pg3 is working now


Feb 2 2012 10:17:34:587AM1120202003Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

Try for plasma --- but no gas jet

fizzle detector back to 0.080 s start
seg2 back on
pg3 back to -20 ms pulse
loaded
open tree done

results --------------------------------

plasma --- I had the density programming too low -- raise to 1e20 for next shot
Feb 2 2012 10:36:12:487AM1120202004Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

nl04 request from 6 to 10e19 /m^2
loaded


results --------------------------------

Plasma into rampdown --- MGJ fired
Feb 2 2012 11:16:49:747AM1120202005Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

plasma ----

for last two shots:
polarimeter follows disruption nicely on all chords -- 60 degree rotations
Feb 2 2012 11:26:17:383AM1120202006Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

plasma
Feb 2 2012 11:48:22:063AM1120202007Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

fizzle
Feb 2 2012 12:03:26:267PM1120202008Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

plasma
Feb 2 2012 12:26:35:100PM1120202009Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

pg4 from 17 to 15 ms --- disruption recovery improvement?

results --------------------------------

plasma
Feb 2 2012 12:43:00:073PM1120202010Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

plasma
Feb 2 2012 01:23:20:163PM1120202011Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

Bt from 5.42 to 5.6 T

results --------------------------------

plasma
Feb 2 2012 01:26:17:567PM1120202012Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

seg 1 Bt changed to 5.6 T

results --------------------------------

plasma

Feb 2 2012 01:45:16:673PM1120202013Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

plasma
Feb 2 2012 02:12:39:947PM1120202014Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

plasma
Feb 2 2012 02:26:16:040PM1120202015Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

plasma
Feb 2 2012 02:59:46:503PM1120202016Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

plasma
Feb 2 2012 03:52:29:343PM1120202017Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

plasma
Feb 2 2012 03:52:36:157PM1120202018Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

plasma
Feb 2 2012 03:52:42:707PM1120202019Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

plasma
Feb 2 2012 04:15:37:627PM1120202020Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

plasma
Feb 2 2012 04:29:42:673PM1120202021Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

plasma
Feb 2 2012 04:49:26:123PM1120202022Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

plasma
Feb 2 2012 05:04:28:510PM1120202023Jim Irbychanges --------------------------------

no dpcs changes

results --------------------------------

plasma

Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
109:13:58:630AMTestOk
209:51:43:637AMTestBadGas Jet didn't work
310:11:40:963AMPlasmaOk
410:29:55:123AMPlasmaOk
510:57:47:227AMPlasmaOk
611:20:37:377AMPlasmaOk
711:42:21:140AMPlasmaOk
812:01:23:577PMPlasmaOk
912:22:28:777PMPlasmaOk
1012:35:23:860PMPlasmaOk
1112:58:40:407PMPlasmaOk
1201:20:17:877PMPlasmaOk
1301:40:51:667PMPlasmaOk
1402:00:55:360PMPlasmaOk
1502:24:03:567PMPlasmaOk
1602:44:57:587PMPlasmaOk
1703:05:06:207PMPlasmaOk
1803:26:46:770PMPlasmaOk
1903:46:43:330PMPlasmaOk
2004:07:39:917PMPlasmaOk
2104:26:48:473PMPlasmaOk
2204:46:20:713PMPlasmaOk
2305:05:34:887PMPlasmaOk

System Availability
Feb 2 2012 09:13:38:790AM
SystemAvailableCommentAvailability
Changed
OwnerDescriptionWho Can
Change
Active MHDnosecured - tagged outJun 02 2008 11:03AM (sears)Joe SnipesActive MHD Antennagolfit
BESyesBES system is onlineNov 22 2011 02:21PM (bespam)Bill RowanBeam Emission Spectroscopybespam,liao,rowan
BolometersyesMidplane and LEDGE-AX diodes functioning properly. Midplane bolometers working and calibrated. LEDGE/DIV bolometers working, but toaster calibration not yet complete.Jan 23 2012 12:02PM (mlreinke)Matt ReinkeBolometershutch,mlreinke
BoronizationnoBottle Removed. System has been tested and will be ready once bottle is installedJan 09 2012 06:32AM (dekow)Jim IrbyBoronizationdekow,irby
CECEno Jan 06 2012 03:48PM Anne WhiteCorrelation ECEwhitea
CNPAyesMultiple channel CNPA available, no safety risk for in-vessel accessApr 14 2011 12:01PM (parker)Ron ParkerCompact Neutral Analyzerparker
Cryopump - Upper DivertoryesOperational. He level meter not working on 500L dewar. Frank will take manual readings.Jan 11 2012 11:46AM (labombard)Brian LaBombardUpper Divertor Cryopumpdekow,irby,labombard
CXRSyescore-CXRS system is onlineNov 22 2011 02:21PM (bespam)Bill RowanCharge Exchange Spectroscopybespam,blip,liao,rachmcd,rowan
CXRS edgeyesMichael CHurchill has primary responsibility at the momentApr 19 2011 11:44AM (blip)Bruce LipshultzMeasurement of CXR light in the pedestal region at both the high- and low-field sidesblip,rmchurch
D Alphayes\ha2_bright is available; \SPECTROSCOPY::TOP.VUV.VIS_SIGNALS:MCP_VIS_SIG1 is not availableJul 01 2009 09:45AM (terry)Jim TerryBalmer Alpha Monitorirby,terry,wolfe
Dalsanosystem is is installed and aligned, but not functional (appears to be a broken cable)Dec 05 2011 02:41PM (marmar)Earl MarmarVisible Bremsstrahlung Imagingmarmar
Disruption Mitigationnogas jet valve disabled on 2011/04/13Apr 13 2011 02:04PM (granetz)Robert GranetzGas Jetgranetz,whyte
Divertor IRno Mar 06 2007 10:50AM Glen WurdenDivertor IR Digital Videogwurden,terry
Divertor IR Spectroscopyno Mar 06 2007 10:51AM Glen WurdenDivertor IR Spectroscopygwurden,terry
DMBolo AXUV diodesyesDiodes are taking usable data. Not all post-processing code is working yet.Feb 01 2012 01:24PM (golynyk)Geoff OlynykSet of six AXUV diodes in a toroidal array of midplane wall boxes.golynyk,granetz,mlreinke,whyte
DNByes Dec 01 2011 11:46AM (granetz)Robert GranetzDiagnostic Neutral Beamdterry,granetz,mochung
ECDCyesOperational as of 11/19/11Nov 22 2011 03:01PM (irby)Jim Irby2.45 GHz, 3 kW, discharge cleaning systemdekow,irby,pfeiffer
FRC-ECEnoPower off to RF and IF sections- Power on to DAApr 11 2011 02:54PM (phillips)Perry PhillipsHeterodyne ECE-32 channelsbespam,liao,phillips,rowan,whitea
FTCIno Jan 06 2012 04:36PM Jim IrbyFast two-color interferometerirby
G-Side Ratiomaticyes Dec 02 2011 12:24PM (toland)Brian LaBombardG-side ratiomatic ionization gaugelabombard,toland
Glow DischargenoPower supply unplugged and redtagged, HV cables removedApr 14 2011 08:03AM (dekow)Jim Irby1 kV, 5 A, glow discharge systemdekow,dterry,irby
GPCyesUsing new preamps.Nov 30 2011 07:51AM (hubbard)Amanda HubbardECE Polychromaterhubbard
GPC2yesDewar cold. Nov 21 2011 09:55AM (hubbard)Amanda HubbardECE Polychromaterhubbard
GPIyesThe Xpt-view, the midplane-view cameras are operational. The innerwall GPI (coupled to the fast-diodes) is available. Jul 01 2009 09:45AM (terry)Jim TerryGas Puff Imagingterry,zweben
H/Dyessystem is functional and taking dataDec 05 2011 02:42PM (marmar)Earl MarmarH/D Ratiomarmar
HEATyes Jan 09 2012 06:32AM (dekow)Gary Dekow - Machine Heaters -burke,dekow
Hirex JryesHirex-Jr has been installedJun 28 2010 03:36PM (rice)John RiceHigh Resolution X-Rayince,rice
Hirex SryesInstalled and aligned. Will be available for Ti/Vr profiles after focusing tests and locked modes are taken.Dec 06 2011 08:21AM (ypodpaly)John RiceHigh Resolution X-Raycgao,ldelgado,rice,ypodpaly
HXRyes32 Channels operational,, no safety risk for in-vessel accessApr 14 2011 12:05PM (parker)Ron ParkerHard X-Ray Arrayfaust,parker,schmidt
ICRF D-AntennanosecuredApr 14 2011 08:55AM (wukitch)Steve WukitchD-port antennawukitch,ylin
ICRF E-AntennanosecuredApr 14 2011 08:55AM (wukitch)Steve WukitchE-port antennawukitch,ylin
ICRF J-AntennanosecuredApr 14 2011 08:56AM (wukitch)Steve WukitchJ-port antennawukitch,ylin
Impurity SpectroscopyyesBeing upgraded with better optics and new spectrographs. Dan Miller has primary responsibility.Apr 19 2011 11:46AM (blip)Bruce LipshultzMeasurement of recycling light and impurity source rates at multiple surfaces around the tokamakblip,miller
Laser Blow-OffyesOperational and testedJan 06 2012 03:50PM (g)Martin GreenwaldImpurity Injection Systemg,nthoward
Lower HybridnoLH HV Breaker Opened and Tagged, TPS Upgrade UnderwayNov 10 2011 03:51PM (dterry)Ron ParkerLower Hybriddterry,parker,wallaceg
Lower Hybrid ReflectometernooffApr 15 2011 08:24AM (dominguez)Arturo DominguezLower Hybrid Reflectometerdominguez,marmar,parker,sgbaek
LoWEUSyesLoWEUS viewing the 10-30 nm region, spectral brightness vs. lambda and time are being stored in tree.Jan 23 2012 12:03PM (mlreinke)Matthew L. Reinke Long Wavelength Extreme Ultraviolet Spectrometermarkchil,mlreinke
LPInoBeam line removedMay 30 2008 02:09PM (bose)Earl MarmarLithium Pellet Injectorbose,marmar
Ly-alphayesMidplane Lyman-a and LEDGE-LY working normally. New B-PORT Lyman (BPLY) still being debugged.Jan 23 2012 12:04PM (mlreinke)Matt ReinkeLyman alpha camerasfaustian,labombard,mlreinke
Magneticsyes Dec 01 2011 11:51AM (g)Robert GranetzBp coils and flux loops for equilibrium controlgranetz,wolfe
McPhersonno**vacuum system problem*** McPherson viewing the 10-14 nm region for molybdenum monitoring. It's days are numbered as LoWEUS has demonstrated superiority.Jan 31 2012 08:15AM (mlreinke)Jim TerryVUV Spectrometermarkchil,mlreinke,terry
MichelsonyesFront end at 4.5e-8 T. Reduced speed for initial operation.Nov 30 2011 07:51AM (hubbard)Amanda HubbardECE Te Profileshubbard,schmidt
MKSyes Dec 02 2011 12:27PM (toland)Brian LaBombardBaratron pressure gaugeslabombard,toland
MLPnoSystem is in edge lab. Version 2 drivers ready to test. Needs a student to help work on it.Jul 14 2009 09:20PM (labombard)Brian LaBombardMirror Langmuir Probe Electronics Systemlabombard
MSEno1/3/2011: push-pull mechanism broken. MSE inoperativeJan 03 2012 11:47AM (sscott)Steve ScottMotional Stark Effectjinseok,sscott
NeutronsyesHigh voltage is on. We're ready for plasma.Nov 21 2011 12:58PM (fiore)Catherine FioreNeutron Detectorsfiore
Neuts and HardsyesAll detectors Powered On --- Waiting for neutrons for calibrationNov 22 2011 01:05PM (irby)Jim IrbyX-Ray/Neutron Detectors at K-Horirby
NINJAyesC-bottom and new F-bottom system ready.Dec 02 2011 12:28PM (toland)Brian LaBombardNINJA gas pufflabombard,terry,toland
PCIyesOperational.Nov 30 2011 12:45PM (ntsujii)Miklos PorkolabPhase Contrast Imagingemd,ennever,ntsujii,porkolab
Penning GaugesyesOperational. High voltage comes on during INIT and off at RECOOL.Dec 09 2011 09:48AM (labombard)Brian LaBombardPenning Ionization Gaugeslabombard
Plasma TVyesWIDE1, WIDE2 (chan 33), DANT, JANT and DIV are operational.Jul 01 2009 09:46AM (terry)Jim TerryVideo of plasma via several camerasdekow,irby,terry,wolfe
Polarimeteryes3 chords operational but with high noise levelJan 06 2012 04:22PM (irby)Jim IrbyC-Mod Polarimeterirby
Power - Alternator Air Switchyes Jan 09 2012 06:33AM (dekow)Gary Dekowfeeds all the other suppliescochran,dekow,dterry,irby
Power - PEIyes Jan 09 2012 06:33AM (dekow)Gary DekowPEI Systemcochran,dekow,dterry,irby
Power - TMXyes Jan 09 2012 06:33AM (dekow)Gary DekowEf2s,. EFCs and A-Coilsbyford,cochran,dekow,dterry,irby
Power Systemsyes Jan 09 2012 06:33AM (dekow)Jim IrbyC-Mod Magnet Suppliesbyford,cochran,dekow,dterry,irby
Probe Array - ISDyesOperational, except for probe #1 (open circuit) and probe #16 (not installed).Dec 09 2011 09:50AM (labombard)Brian LabombardInner Lower Divertor Probe Arraylabombard
Probe Array - LHyesOperational, except for bottom-D probe (open circuit).Dec 09 2011 09:52AM (labombard)Brian LaBombardLower Hybrid Probe Arraylabombard
Probe Array - OSDyesF-divertor ok. J-divertor ok, except for JDIV_06 which is shorted out.Dec 09 2011 09:54AM (labombard)Brian LaBombardOuter Lower Divertor Probe Array (F and J)labombard
Probe Array - UDIVyesOperational except for probes #4, 5 and 13 (open)Dec 09 2011 09:56AM (labombard)Brian LaBombardUpper Divertor Probe Arraylabombard
ReflectometeryesAs of 1120105xxx, all channels are connectedJan 05 2012 09:14AM (dominguez)Earl MarmarReflectometerdominguez,marmar
Scanning Probe - ASPyesIon Sensitive Probe head installed. Testing in piggy-back mode.Dec 20 2011 12:33PM (labombard)Brian LaBombardA-Port Scanning Probelabombard
Scanning Probe - FSPyesOperational.Dec 09 2011 09:57AM (labombard)Brian LaBombardF-Port Scanning Probelabombard
Scanning Probe - WASPyesA-port WASP is operational. K-port WASP is dead (all probes melted together).Dec 09 2011 09:58AM (labombard)Brian LaBombardInner Wall Scanning Probelabombard,nsmick
Shoelace AntennayesFixed frequency operation available (100kHz) at moderate power (< 0.5kW). Otherwise in receiver mode.Jan 11 2012 11:50AM (labombard)Brian LaBombardHigh-k active MHD antenna, for QCM, WCM studiesgolfit,labombard
SOL reflectometeryesc-port waveguides operational, h-port waveguides are not.Nov 29 2011 12:04PM (cornwall)Cornwall LauSOL reflectometercornwall,wukitch,ylin
SparkeryesNew Type II sparker replaced Type I on 11/17/2011Nov 23 2011 08:53AM (irby)Jim IrbyField Emission Preionization for C-Moddekow,irby,parkin
Surface Science StationnoSSS is up to air, no safety issuesApr 14 2011 12:06PM (ochoukov)Bruce LipschultzRadially scanning probe located on K-portblip,ochoukov
TCIyesTCI Operational. Density feedback operational.Nov 10 2011 11:47AM (irby)Jim IrbyTwo-Color Interferometerirby,murray
TS - CoreyesOperating with one 50Hz laser, precise density calibration still required.Jan 31 2012 09:15AM (jwhughes)Jerry HughesCore Thomson scatteringjrwalk,jwhughes,yma
TS - EdgenoSystem being checked out. No useful edge data yet.Jan 31 2012 09:15AM (jwhughes)Jerry HughesMillimeter resolution edge Thomson scatteringjrwalk,jwhughes,yma
Vispecno350 and 670 nm, 4 spatial channelsNov 28 2007 09:58AM (agraf)Alex GrafVisible Spectrometeragraf
XEUSyesXEUS viewing the 1-6 nm region, spectral brightness vs. lambda and time are being stored in tree.Jan 23 2012 12:13PM (mlreinke)Matt ReinkeX-ray Extended Ultraviolet Spectrometermarkchil,mlreinke
XTOMOyesARRAY1->4 working normally, ARRAY5 (new core view) working but spatial calibration issues not yet resolvedJan 23 2012 12:13PM (mlreinke)Robert GranetzX-Ray Tomographyfaustian,granetz,mlreinke