| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Geoff Olynyk |
| Physics operator(s): | Steve Wolfe |
| Engineering operator(s): | Bill Cochran,Bill Cochran,Bill Parkin,Bill Byford |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| MP 675 - "Initial disruption mitigation experiments with two gas jets" |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Sep 10 2012 02:41:53:620PM |
| Author: Geoff Olynyk |
![]() |
| Entered: Sep 10 2012 03:26:37:787PM |
| Author: Geoff Olynyk |
| Session leader plan for run 1120911 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)
MP 675 - "Initial disruption mitigation experiments with two gas jets", run 3 of 3. G.M. Olynyk Objectives:
Gas request:
Diagnostics & systems requested:
Important note for diagnosticians: After disruption mitigation gas jets are fired, torus pressures can rise as high as 1 torr. Although, we will only fire a single gas jet on this day and so it shouldn't go above 500 mtorr. If you have sensitive diagnostics, these should have their protective gate valves closed. Notes for PhysOp and RF operator:
Other instructions (Session Leader, auxiliary systems, diagnostic setup, etc.):
In all RF-heated cases, we turn on the RF at 0.750 s and induce disruption at 0.900 s (about 3 energy confinement times later). This is to prevent too much heating of divertor and limiter surfaces. The scans are quite fine, and with optimum timing, the targets are repeated. This is because we almost always observe significant variation in gas jet mitigated disruptions, even with identical target plasmas, and we want to be able to build statistics and find what is actually controlling the differences. It is noted that this plan comprises 25 useful shots, plus any required for discharge development. Given the long inter-shot wait time on gas jet shots, plus the extra-long wait time when we fire both gas jets, this is an ambitious plan. We hope to be able to accomplish the majority of the run plan. |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Entered: Sep 10 2012 03:25:54:190PM |
| Author: Steve Wolfe |
| Physop plan and engineering setup for Tuesday, Sep 11, 2012
MP#675 Initial disruption mitigation experiments with two gas jets (part 3) SL: Olynyk PO: wolfe ----------------- Engineering Setup ----------------- Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 17:00 Power systems as on: 1120907028 Acoil: -Dtop +Dbot +Jtop -Jbot (standard reverse field) Hybrid Enabled Gas setup: Fill B-Top with 6 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG4) fill B-side lower with 2 psi Neon Hybrid DISABLED (PG1) leave B-side upper as is Hybrid DISABLED (PG2) fill B-main (C-side) with 40 psi D2 Hybrid enabled (PG3) fill H-bot with 1psi (or less) Argon (Hybrid enabled) (PG5) fill NINJA with 10 psi D2 DISABLED Enable gate-valves and shutters: VUV, Xeus/LoWEUS DISABLE gate valves for ECE and HIREX_SR Leave z-bolo shutter as is (should be open) Torvac gatevalve toggle (yes/no): yes Boronization(yes/no): no Overnight ECDC (yes/no): yes ICRF(yes/no): yes LH(yes/no): no Cryopump (yes/no): no DNB (yes/no): no Vessel temperature: 35/35/35 ------------------------------ ECDC Parameters (if requested) ------------------------------ gas and pressure: D2 at 2e-4 Torr sweep: 44/45/103 cm scan: 20/120 s ********************************************** Physics operator plan: Load from 1120907, adjust TF_CURRENT for 5.6T (156900) Reduce nl04 program from 8 to 7e19; consider changes in PID for nl04 for non-cryopump. Change seg1 pg4 puff to 20msec (no cryo) Probably want to reduce ic_ef4 from 1320 Initial shot is planned for 2.5MW, so hold off on the neon until we need it. Almost the whole run is at fixed plasma target, except for the rf power, so after the first couple of shots there won't be a lot of dpcs adjustments except for startup and keeping an eye on the neon seeding and watching the shoelace. The last few shots are supposed to aim for H-mode at higher density nl04=1.1e20 (no I-mode window) May want to go back up to 5.8T if the sawteeth seem to be degrading the I-mode access or performance or anything. Should figure that out in the first 6 shots. |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Sep 11 2012 05:20:07:293PM |
| Author: Geoff Olynyk |
Session Leader Summary for 1120911 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012) MP 675 - Initial disruption mitigation experiments with two gas jets, run 3 of 3 The goal today was to explore gas jet disruption mitigation (rapid shutdown) with multiple gas jets into high-stored-energy I-modes, in the lower-single-null reversed-field configuration. Overall, the day was moderately successful, although we had to do abbreviated scans because of problems with the ICRF heating system and with the F-port gas injector. The first phase of the SL_PLAN was to do a scan of stored energy by varying the ICRF heating into otherwise-identical I-mode targets, and to develop a stable high-power target, with reproducible stored energy, for the later scan of gas jet stagger time. During this phase, we fired only a single gas jet (the B-port gas jet). Unfortunately, the FMIT (transmitter) for the E-port ICRF antenna had a problem with its crowbar, and so we had to use only two antennas (J and D). This meant that developing the high-power scenario was more difficult, since we had to push more power through each remaining antenna. Using an nl04 target of 0.7e20, we tried to develop a 4.00 MW scenario, but didn't have much luck. In the end, we had to reduce the power to about 3.60 MW of auxiliary heating, and increase the density target (nl04) to 0.8e20. This gave us stable heating from 0.750 s to our (induced) disruptions at 0.900 s, and a stored energy of about 128 kJ. The stored energy was remarkably consistent – using I-mode targets to get a high-power, high-stored-energy target was a good idea. With our target developed as of shot 8, we went on to fire single gas jets (B and F) into that target. This was used to verify the timing of the gas jets, in order to get a 'delta' between when the trigger was sent and when light was first seen on the DMBolo diodes. At this point, we found out that the F-port gas jet was behaving differently in the reversed-field configuration than it did in forward field: when there was plasma, it would "run away", i.e. it would not close after the pressure pulse, emptying the entire gas jet plenum into the torus, and raising torus pressures to multiple torr (2–4 torr). This meant that the pumpdown/recovery time between shots was extremely long – about 35 minutes, instead of the usual 15–20 minutes. We discussed some possible ways to fix it between shots, but in the end, decided to just press on, and abbreviated the stagger-time scan to reflect the reduced number of shots we now expected to get. We covered stagger times of -1.00 ms, -0.50 ms, 0.00 ms (optimum), +0.50 ms, and +1.00 ms. (Negative times mean that the gas from the F-jet arrived at the plasma before the gas from the B-jet.) Interspersed with a couple of fizzles, this took us through to shot 018. It is noted that the F-jet did not run away when there was TF but no plasma (on a fizzle), indicating that it was the poloidal field (specifically, the radial component of it) that was the problem. It is also noted that the F-valve seemed to open faster today than it did in forward field, requiring an adjustment in timing to get the optimum (when the gas from the B and F jets arrives at the plasma at the same time). If the radial component of the poloidal field in this reverse-field configuration were pulling the valve open (thus causing the 'runaway'), this would be consistent with the same field pulling the valve open faster at the beginning of the pressure pulse. After completing the (abbreviated) scan of gas jet stagger time, we tried two more shots with optimum timing. Shot 019 used the timing developed earlier in the day. Finally, we tried one more timing, moving the F-jet earlier by 0.300 ms, just to either fill in one more point in the scan, or find the optimum. Shot 020 was a fizzle and 021 (taken at 5:15 pm) used our adjusted timing. Overall, a successful run day, and lots of good data at high stored energy to use for G. Olynyk's thesis and to inform the ITER disruption mitigation system. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Sep 11 2012 05:55:06:053PM |
| Author: Steve Wolfe |
Physics Operator Summary for Tuesday, Sept 11, 2012
MP#675 Gas jet disruption experiments with 2 gas jets
SL: Olynyk
PO: wolfe
EO: Cochran, Parkin, Byford
*********************************************************************
Warning for future runs: Due to physop error, the TF on all shots today
is ramping up from 5.6T at .2sec to 5.7T at 0.9sec (and would reach 5.8T
at 1.5sec if it didn't disrupt at 0.9sec.
This was an accident, you probably don't want to repeat it.
**********************************************************************
The machine ran pretty well today, but some problems with the RF and
with the gas jet system itself somewhat compromised the run.
There was a problem with the FMIT#2 crowbar trigger that took the E-port
antenna out of commission for the day; this is still unresolved. As a result,
we were unable to get over 3.5MW reliably from the combination of D and J,
which limited the stored energy to < 130kJ.
After we got going, it turned out that the F-port Gas Jet valve stayed
open after firing, dumping the whole plenum into the torus. This slowed
the shot cycle to about 30minutes, and required cell access after each
successful shot to reset gate valves. It turns out that this effect only
happened on plasma shots. Fizzles only gave the nominal amount of gas from
the F and B jets. We conclude that the fields, probably mainly from EF4,
are acting to keep the solenoid open in reversed field operation.
Shot#1 was the usual Tuesday data system test, except Bob had left
the gas jet enabled so it fired and filled the torus. There were also
issues with computers and data system, mostly fixed by Josh who came in
early to deal with them, before disappearing for an off-campus meeting.
There were no data system problems after this, although it was necessary
to contact Mark London to have a problem on the alc-compute-1 disk mounting
remedied (after shot#2).
All plasmas today were successfully disrupted at 0.9sec by the gas jet(s).
The gas jet also fired on 3 of the 4 fizzles; apparently the interlock
to the fizzle detector worked on the fourth fizzle.
Shots #2-8 were a combination of Wmhd scan and discharge development
to optimize rf to provide a reliable target energy. We ended up reducing
the outer gap somewhat from the reference shot, increasing the neon
puff to 90, and raising the target nl04 program from 7e19 to 8e19. The
RF pulse was kept short to avoid excess heating of the shoelace and GH
limter, which were lighting up some. Longer rf pulses should probably
put the gap back to 2cm, and may need higher density yet. The maximum
reliable RF power today was 3.5MW in this configuration.
Shots#9-21 were a scan of relative timing of the jets. There were a number
of fizzles during this sequence, most as a consequence of higher than
optimum pressure at breakdown. The ratiomatic was down for much of the
day, but after it was revived, the pressure reading at breakdown varied
from 0.07 to 0.1 mTorr. The pg4 puff was typically 20msec, and I dropped
it down as low as 16 msec by the last shot (following the 5o'clock fizzle).
At the start of the day it was noted that several LN2 valves were leaking and
at least one was sticking. Gary was able to take advantage of the long
shot intervals to thaw and chop his way down to these and tighten them up.
The zbolo shutter is stuck in a mainly closed position, which blocks the
view of hirex_jr, so after a failed attempt to fix it, the Argon was
turned off on shot#9.
Scorecard:
Test shots 1 (with gas jet!)
Duds 0
Fizzles 4
Plasmas 16
|
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Sep 13 2012 01:40:15:967PM | Geoff Olynyk | List of all shots from run 1120911, plus good shots to use for scans.
Note t_stag = F_trig–B_trig+(F_delay–B_delay) where B_delay = 2.900 ms; F_delay = 3.450 ms therefore F_delay–B_delay = 0.550 ms so if F_trig–B_trig = –0.550 ms, then t_stag = 0 num nebar Wth B_trig F_trig t_stag Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 001 -- -- -- -- -- * No plasma (C-Mod cycle test) 002 1.67 92 0.900000 -- -- Wth scan - note high density 003 1.01 97 0.900000 -- -- Wth scan - density better 004 1.06 111 0.900000 -- -- Wth scan 005 1.08 107 0.900000 -- -- ICRF trippy 006 1.12 89 0.900000 -- -- ICRF even more trippy 007 1.07 113 0.900000 -- -- Wth scan - ICRF better 008 1.19 121 0.900000 -- -- Increased density; I-mode 009 1.17 131 -- 0.898940 -- First shot with F-jet 010 1.17 128 -- 0.899030 -- Another F-jet only; determine it is running away 011 -- -- 0.900000 0.899760 +0.310 * Fizzle. Both jets fired 012 1.17 110 0.900000 0.899760 +0.310 RF trippy; both gas jets fired 013 1.15 127 0.900000 0.898760 -0.690 Good RF and Wth; use for t_stag scan 014 1.11 128 0.900000 0.899260 -0.190 Decent RF; use for t_stag scan 015 -- -- 0.900000 0.900260 +0.810 * Fizzle. Both jets fired 016 1.15 124 0.900000 0.900260 +0.810 Good RF and Wth; use for t_stag scan 017 -- -- -- -- -- * Fizzle. Jets didn't fire 018 1.11 122 0.900000 0.900760 +1.310 Decent RF and Wth; use for t_stag scan 019 1.13 121 0.900000 0.899760 +0.310 Decent RF and Wth; use for t_stag scan 020 -- -- 0.900000 0.899460 +0.010 * Fizzle. Both jets fired 021 1.13 124 0.900000 0.899460 +0.010 RF tripped; Wth recovering; use for t_stag scan We want to use the following shots for our Wth scan (B-jet only): shot nebar Wth Other notes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1120622007 1.55 64 Forward field; L-mode; note higher density 1120911006 1.12 89 Reverse field; probably L-mode 1120911003 1.01 97 Reverse field; probably L-mode 1120911005 1.08 107 Reverse field; probably L-mode 1120911004 1.06 111 Reverse field; probably L-mode 1120911007 1.07 113 Reverse field; could be L- or I-mode 1120911008 1.19 121 Reverse field; I-mode And the following shots for the gas jet stagger time scan: shot nebar Wth t_stag Other notes ---------------------------------------------------------- 1120911010 1.17 128 F only Reverse field; I-mode 1120911013 1.15 127 -0.690 Reverse field; I-mode 1120911014 1.11 128 -0.190 Reverse field; I-mode 1120911021 1.13 124 +0.010 Reverse field; I-mode 1120911019 1.13 121 +0.310 Reverse field; I-mode 1120911016 1.15 124 +0.810 Reverse field; I-mode 1120911018 1.11 122 +1.310 Reverse field; I-mode 1120911008 1.19 121 B only Reverse field; I-mode | |
| Sep 11 2012 08:45:12:607AM | 1120911001 | Geoff Olynyk | Shot 1 was a system test earlier today, and is not part of MP 675. |
| Sep 11 2012 08:47:48:500AM | 1120911002 | Geoff Olynyk | Possible delay due to problem with the interlock on the door between the control room and the power room. Bill Byford being called.
Also - No E-antenna due to transmitter crowbar (?), at least for first three shots. |
| Sep 11 2012 09:06:38:210AM | 1120911002 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Starting phase 1 of SL_PLAN: Wth scan with a single gas jet. I-mode target from 1120907026/027/028, with 2.50 MW ICRF heating from D and J antennas only (FMIT for E-antenna has a crowbar). Gas jets - B-jet only, firing at t=0.900000 s. Result: Locked mode B-jet fired successfully Good mitigated disruption Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 275 mtorr (didn't close gate valves so may be a slight underestimate) |
| Sep 11 2012 09:10:46:460AM | 1120911002 | Geoff Olynyk | No Thomson on this shot (they weren't warmed up yet - decided to take the shot anyway). |
| Sep 11 2012 09:26:12:803AM | 1120911003 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Continue Wth scan, with single gas jet. ICRF heating increased to 3.00 MW from D and J antennas. Gas jets - B-jet only, firing at t=0.900000 s. Result: RF tripping down to 2 MW, stored energy 97 kJ at disruption Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 302 mtorr |
| Sep 11 2012 09:48:40:030AM | 1120911004 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Continue Wth scan, with single gas jet. ICRF heating increased to 3.50 MW from D and J antennas. Gas jets - B-jet only, firing at t=0.900000 s. Result: - Probably an I-mode - Gas jet fired successfully - D antenna faulting just before disruption, stored energy 111 kJ at time of disruption - More noise on DMBolo channels on that one than on shots 2 or 3 Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 302 mtorr |
| Sep 11 2012 10:07:04:610AM | 1120911005 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Continue Wth scan, with single gas jet. Requested ICRF heating increased to 4.00 MW from D and J antennas. This will be our max heating possible, since we have no E-antenna. Enable neon seeding for this shot (B-side lower) to try to improve ICRF coupling. Gas jets - B-jet only, firing at t=0.900000 s. Result: - Gas jet fired successfully - D-antenna faulting again, stored energy 107 kJ at time of disruption Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 299 mtorr |
| Sep 11 2012 10:26:44:683AM | 1120911006 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Try to fill in our Wth scan by going back to approx. 3.5 MW and modifying the power waveform to reduce faulting (step D antenna up in steps). Gas jets - B-jet only, firing at t=0.900000 s. Result: - Gas jet fired successfully - D antenna still tripping a lot, stored energy 89 kJ at disruption Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 296 mtorr |
| Sep 11 2012 10:55:05:947AM | 1120911007 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Increase neon seeding and reduce outer gap to try to improve RF performance. Total RF request just over 3.5 MW, from D and J antennas. Gas jets - B-jet only, firing at t=0.900000 s. Result: - Gas jet fired successfully - Still tripping, stored energy 114 kJ at disruption Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 308 mtorr |
| Sep 11 2012 11:30:58:693AM | 1120911009 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Move to phase 2 of SL_PLAN. Use target developed in shot 008. Gas jets - F-jet only, firing at t = 0.898 940 s. Result: - F-jet fired but ran away really badly - stayed open for 200 ms, emptied the entire plenum ... very much hoping that this was not the dying gasp of the valve (we'll repeat the shot to confirm) - Good RF. Stored energy at time of disruption - 131 kJ - Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 2500 mtorr (!) |
| Sep 11 2012 11:51:43:393AM | 1120911009 | Geoff Olynyk | Trying to figure out timing -
shot 8 (B-jet only) trigger time 0.900 000 s start to see light in plasma at 0.903 070 delay 3.070 ms shot 9 (F-jet only) trigger time 0.898 940 s start to see light in plasma at 0.902 978 s delay 4.038 ms delta_delay = 0.968 ms Use delta_delay of -0.97 ms. So if we fire B-jet at 0.900 s, we want to fire F-jet at 0.89903 |
| Sep 11 2012 11:57:26:033AM | 1120911009 | Geoff Olynyk | Taking cell access before shot 10. That huge pressure pulse made all kinds of gate valves close and stay closed, have to be manually reset. |
| Sep 11 2012 12:18:09:400PM | 1120911010 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Returning to business after long delay from runaway pressure pulse on last shot. Repeat shot 9, hopefully F-jet doesn't run away this time. Slightly change timing to new optimum (delta, of -0.97 ms, that is, fire F-jet earlier than B-jet by 0.97 ms) Gas jets - F-jet only, firing at t = 0.899 030 s. Result: - F-jet fired but ran away again ... - Good RF. Stored energy at time of disruption - 128 kJ - Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 2700 mtorr (!) |
| Sep 11 2012 12:29:09:713PM | 1120911010 | Geoff Olynyk | Another long cell access after shot 10 to reset gate valves. |
| Sep 11 2012 12:42:26:107PM | 1120911011 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Rui Vieira and Bob Granetz hit the F-jet with a hammer (seriously - a rubber mallet). Gas jets - BOTH enabled B-jet firing at t = 0.900 000 s F-jet firing at t = 0.899 760 s Result: - Fizzle. No plasma, no RF. - B-jet and F-jet fired successfully. No flow runaway this time. - Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 572 mtorr (!) next - repeat with plasma |
| Sep 11 2012 01:07:17:463PM | 1120911012 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Attempt to fire both gas jets at same time again, but with plasma. Gas jets - BOTH enabled B-jet firing at t = 0.900 000 s F-jet firing at t = 0.899 760 s Result: - Plasma. RF faulted (D then J); stored energy down to 110 kJ at time of disruption. - B-jet and F-jet fired successfully. F-jet ran away though. - Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 2600 mtorr (!) |
| Sep 11 2012 01:42:22:983PM | 1120911013 | Geoff Olynyk | Slow progress due to very long pumpdown times due to F-port valve running away.
It's probably the reverse-field operation - this is causing a difference in magnetic field along the axis of the solenoid vs. the forward-field operation (because the F-port fast valve is mounted so that it points radially outward, and is below the midplane). We should rotate the F-port valve so it's oriented a different way relative to the large poloidal field. |
| Sep 11 2012 01:54:02:040PM | 1120911013 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
No choice but to carry on (at greatly reduced rate due to very long pumpdown time with the F-jet running away like this). Move to -1.00 ms stagger time. Gas jets - BOTH enabled B-jet firing at t = 0.900 000 s F-jet firing at t = 0.898 760 s Result: - Plasma. RF good this time - stored energy 128 kJ at time of disruption - B-jet and F-jet fired successfully. F-jet ran away again. - Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 3200 mtorr (!) |
| Sep 11 2012 02:09:40:050PM | 1120911014 | Geoff Olynyk | Two ideas for fixing this during the run today (during one of our nice 40-minute pumpdown times)...
1. Add a sleeve of iron around the F-valve. Problem is that it experiences a field (PF) of about 0.1 T, which means it would experience significant force. So any such sleeve would have to be strongly bolted to something. 2. Rotate the valve/plenum assembly about the "axis of the plumbing" so that the valve axis points toroidally (instead of radially). The problem is that there is no "axis of plumbing" because the stainless steel pipes come in to the plenum at one angle, and go out of the valve 90 degrees off from that. So we can't rotate the valve/plenum assembly simply by unbolting some ConFlat gaskets - it has to be significantly re-plumbed. It appears that we have no choice but to continue on at this reduced shot frequency. |
| Sep 11 2012 04:19:17:383PM | 1120911014 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Continuing phase 2 of SL_PLAN. Move to -0.50 ms stagger time. Gas jets - BOTH enabled B-jet firing at t = 0.900 000 s F-jet firing at t = 0.899 260 s Result: - Plasma. J ICRF antenna tripped once but recovered. Stored energy 128 kJ at time of disruption, on an increasing slope. - B-jet and F-jet fired successfully. F-jet ran away again. - Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 4.3 mtorr (!) Something weird going on. If we're dumping the entire F-valve plenum each time, why is it getting to higher pressure each time this happens? B-jet is working fine, not running away. Suspect a problem with thermocouple gauge. |
| Sep 11 2012 02:49:03:047PM | 1120911015 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Continuing phase 2 of SL_PLAN. Move to +0.50 ms stagger time. Gas jets - BOTH enabled B-jet firing at t = 0.900 000 s F-jet firing at t = 0.900 260 s Result: - Fizzle. No plasma, no RF. - B-jet and F-jet fired successfully. F-jet fired, but did NOT run away. I think we can conclusively say that it's the fields that are causing the F-valve to run away. - Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 555.3 mtorr (perfect) next - try again with no fizzle |
| Sep 11 2012 03:34:42:370PM | 1120911016 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Try again at +0.50 ms. Gas jets - BOTH enabled B-jet firing at t = 0.900 000 s F-jet firing at t = 0.900 260 s Result: - Plasma. Good RF coupling. - Both jets fired, F jet ran away again. - Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 4.0 torr (ran away again) |
| Sep 11 2012 03:41:24:707PM | 1120911017 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Go to +1.00 ms stagger time. Gas jets - BOTH enabled B-jet firing at t = 0.900 000 s F-jet firing at t = 0.900 760 s Result: - Fizzle. Gas jets did NOT fire on fizzle (signal went to interlock box - didn't come out - as it is supposed to be.) next - try again |
| Sep 11 2012 03:54:45:207PM | 1120911018 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Go to +1.00 ms stagger time. Gas jets - BOTH enabled B-jet firing at t = 0.900 000 s F-jet firing at t = 0.900 760 s Result: - Plasma. RF (J) faulted once but recovered. Stored energy 121 kJ at disruption. - Gas jets fired successfully. F valve ran away again. - Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 3.3 torr (ran away again) |
| Sep 11 2012 04:39:17:053PM | 1120911019 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Having completed an abbreviated scan of gas jet stagger time (-1.00, -0.50, 0.00, +0.50, and +1.00 ms), we continue to phase 3 of SL_PLAN. Try to build statistics on the most important shot, which is OPTIMUM TIMING INTO HIGH POWER I-MODE. Gas jets - BOTH enabled B-jet firing at t = 0.900 000 s F-jet firing at t = 0.899 760 s Result: - Plasma. RF (J) faulted but recovered. Stored energy 121 kJ at disruption. - Gas jets fired successfully. F valve ran away again. Digitizer on the gas jet system messed up - all the pressure signals, etc. are not what they should be. - Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 3.2 torr (ran away again) |
| Sep 11 2012 04:55:17:253PM | 1120911020 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Adjust timing on F-jet (make it 0.3 ms earlier) and try again. Was supposed to be last shot for today. Gas jets - BOTH enabled B-jet firing at t = 0.900 000 s F-jet firing at t = 0.899 460 s Result: - Fizzle. No RF. - Both gas jets fired successfully, but F-jet didn't run away because no PF. - Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 603 mtorr (F-jet didn't run away) |
| Sep 11 2012 05:18:45:190PM | 1120911021 | Geoff Olynyk | Description:
Try again with adjusted timing on F-jet. Last shot for today. Gas jets - BOTH enabled B-jet firing at t = 0.900 000 s F-jet firing at t = 0.899 460 s (0.3 ms earlier than last time) Result: - Plasma. J antenna tripped out but recovered, kind of late. Stored energy 125 kJ at disruption. - Both gas jets fired successfully. F-jet ran away. - Pressure after shot according to TC gauge (callout from Vacuum Operator) - 3.3 torr (F-jet ran away) |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Sep 11 2012 07:19:45:003AM | Steve Wolfe | Setting up for MP#675 run Load from 1120907028 Seg1 changes: pg4 from 42 msec ending at -.4 to 20msec ending at -.5 ic_ef4u from 1320 to 1310. Seg2 changes: nl04 from 8 to 7e19 leave PID = 4,0,5.4667 until we see how it responds TF_CURRENT from 162500 to 156900 for 5.6T reduce pg5 (argon) from 100msec to 75msec @100% starting .3sec note: pg1 (neon) is 200msec at 60% starting .35sec, Load at 11-Sep-2012 07:18:45.00 Open tree /home/wolfe/pcs_scratch -1 Open tree done Rick Murray reports there may be a delay for RF; FMIT#2 crowbar has a problem. | |
| Sep 11 2012 07:40:06:323AM | 1120911001 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#1: Supposed to have been an no power test, but the gas jet people left their system armed and enabled, so the gas jet fired! Torus is up to 275mTorr. Pumping out now, I hope. |
| Sep 11 2012 09:10:03:727AM | 1120911002 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#2: Trying for the first shot, 2.5MW, nl04=7e19 We will be running without E-port antenna today, so the power scan will be limited to 4MW on the top end. Result:Disrupted qt 0.9sec, with gas jet. GV2 did not close in pulse? Ian's vacbrbz job failed on this shot, alcserv4 seems to not find the /home directory. |
| Sep 11 2012 09:15:31:623AM | 1120911002 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#2: Trying for the first shot, 2.5MW, nl04=7e19 We will be running without E-port antenna today, so the power scan will be limited to 4MW on the top end. Result:Disrupted qt 0.9sec, with gas jet. GV2 did not close in pulse? Ian's vacbrbz job failed on this shot, alcserv4 seems to not find the /home directory. I can move the vacbrbz job, but alc-compute-1 is used for a lot of stuff, including fast_efit and efit20. |
| Sep 11 2012 09:31:35:437AM | 1120911003 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#3: RF at 3MW, no pcs changes. IGT down to 2.2e-6 Torr before INIT Amanda will open ECE permissive for this shot. Result: disrupted on schedule. RF D&J faulted but came back Not sure if this one got an I-mode or not, Wmhd gets to ~100kJ. vacbrbz ran that time, mrl probably fixed alc-compute-1. Injections from the gh limiter (llnl1 camera), and a bit of a cyan spot on the display_energy screen; LLNL1 camera shows some heating on the shoelace and the limiter, does not glow after the disruption. Ratiomatic read .075 mTorr at breakdown, a little on the high side. Next: Increasing rf to 3.5MW, no pcs changes |
| Sep 11 2012 09:49:03:630AM | 1120911004 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#4: RF at 3.5MW, no pcs changes. IGT down to 2.3e-6 Torr before INIT Amanda will not allow ECE permissive for this shot or after. Result: wmhd to 122kJ, but dropped to 110kJ after D-port fault Still getting injections from gh region and maybe shoelace. Yijun would like smaller gap, but I want to hold off a little. Try adding neon to next shot, see if that helps the rf. Next: rf to 4MW, enable neon puff (bside lower) |
| Sep 11 2012 10:16:05:937AM | 1120911005 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#5: RF at 4MW, enable b-side lower: programmed for .35 to .55 at 60%, neon 1.8psi IGT down to 2.5 e-6 Torr before INIT (note that it goes up to 3.5e-6 when gv1 closes) Result: disrupts on schedule, injection at 0.8sec is still there Wmhd 107kJ at disruption, d-faulted again. Neon did not seem to help Next: Change rf waveform, try to keep rf on until gas jet time |
| Sep 11 2012 10:29:17:940AM | 1120911006 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#6: RF at 3.5MW with a step up, no PCS changes IGT to 2.1e-6 before init Result: disrupts on schedule, rf still faulting,max stored energy ~103kJ down at 0.9sec. Next: try reducing outer gap. Presently at 2.0cm, increase rcur by 4mm and see what happens to the gh and shoelace Next: |
| Sep 11 2012 10:51:07:663AM | 1120911007 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#7: try reducing outer gap. Presently at 2.0cm, increase rcur by 4mm from .656 to .660 and see what happens to the gh and shoelace Wukitch is suggesting higher neon puff. Increase pg1 to 90%, still 200ms Load at 11-Sep-2012 10:36:01.00 Open tree /home/wolfe/pcs_scratch -1 Open tree done IGT to 2.5e-6 before INIT, just past 15minutes in recool Result: Wmhd to 116kJ, D still faulting, a little increase in the gh heat, not too bad (first calculation showed a lot more on top??) Next: Go to nl04=0.8e20, see if that helps the RF |
| Sep 11 2012 11:14:31:610AM | 1120911008 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#8: Go to nl04=0.8e20, see if that helps the RF Load at 11-Sep-2012 10:52:22.00 Open tree /home/wolfe/pcs_scratch -1 Open tree done IGT to 1.9e-6 before INIT (delay for EF1L cooling, since LN2 valve is cranky) Result: rf stays on, wmhd to 124kJ Xeus/loweus were enabled on that shot, shows neon is dropping after 0.74sec, could stand delaying the puff, but SL says leave it. Next: begining jet scan, no PCS changes |
| Sep 11 2012 11:29:52:367AM | 1120911009 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#9: begining jet scan, no PCS changes argon (h-bot) off, because zbolo shutter is jammed so hirex_jr is blocked leave neon as is IGT to 2.4e-6 before INIT Result: F-port jet dumped a LOT of gas into the torus Wmhd=130kJ, Prf~3.6MW Aside from the fact that the F-jet valve isn't closing, we should be on our way. Next: Proceed (with caution?) once they pump down |
| Sep 11 2012 12:16:44:657PM | 1120911010 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#10: Proceed (with caution?) once they pump down SL is modifying gas jet timing, firing only F jet IGT to 2.5e-6 after 29minutes in recool Then had a delay for a cell access because all gate valves were closed and could not open from PLC in control room IGT=1.3e-6 before INIT (ratiomatic has died) Result: F-jet dumped its plenum again. It's going to be a long pump. Wmhd=128kJ, target seems to be hanging in there. GV2 didn't close in pulse, but I don't think it matters much since the mks will be saturated anyway. Next: Staggering along? |
| Sep 11 2012 12:46:52:777PM | 1120911011 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#11: Proceed with jet timing scan Both jets enabled. Rui gave the F-jet valve a calibrated whack during the cell access. TS people have abandoned ship IGT at 2.5e-6 after 24minutes, before INIT Result: fizzle, I saw IGT got up to 6e-6 before the pulse. This time the F-jet worked properly. Pressure excursion may have been the VUV gate valve; the McPherson vacuum had shut down, and the permissive was on. Will be off now Next: just try again, same timing |
| Sep 11 2012 01:09:16:357PM | 1120911012 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#12: just try again, same timing Reduce the pg4 from 20 to 18msec Load at 11-Sep-2012 12:48:49.00 Open tree /home/wolfe/pcs_scratch -1 Open tree done IGT 1.6e-6 before INIT Result: F-jet dumped plenum again, only works without plasma? wmhd down to 110kJ, RF faults on both D and J. Startup has an injection on Zmeter, not seen on Dalpha. Next: continue scan, no pcs changes |
| Sep 11 2012 02:08:54:530PM | 1120911013 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#13: continue scan, no pcs changes IGT=2.2e-6 after 35minutes, IGT=1.8e-6 before init (PF coil cooling) Result: Another day another gas jet dump. Wmhd=127kJ, Prf=3.5MW Next: continuing timing scan |
| Sep 11 2012 02:21:23:240PM | 1120911014 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#14: continue scan, no pcs changes IGT=1.9e-6 at 30minutes, before INIT Result: wmhd=128kj at the disruption One RF fault early in the pulse, on J, but it recovered. Torus pressure is increasing each shot. Next: staggering along. |
| Sep 11 2012 02:51:27:963PM | 1120911015 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#15: continue scan, no pcs changes IGT=2.3e-6 at 29 minutes Result: fizzle. Bounced at 17msec, big CIII signal at .01sec Jets fired, and again the F-jet did not dump the plenum. Clearly a field effect. Next: increase pg4 back to 20msec (probably not useful, but something to do). |
| Sep 11 2012 03:13:31:977PM | 1120911016 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#16: increase pg4 back to 20msec, try again Load at 11-Sep-2012 14:52:42.00 Open tree /home/wolfe/pcs_scratch -1 Open tree done IGT to 2.0e-6 at 20minutes, just before INIT Result: plasma disrupts on schedule Wmhd=124kJ RF clean at 3.5MW Next: On with the scan |
| Sep 11 2012 03:42:33:657PM | 1120911017 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#17: On with the scan (after another 30minutes of pumping) Just noticed I must have programmed a slight slope on the TF current; it's at 5.7T instead of 5.6 at 0.9sec, the time of the disruption. I may not have changed the end point from the setting for 5.8T? Too late to worry about it now, shouldn't hurt, since it's been that way all day. IGT=2.5e-6 at 28minutes, before INIT No TS this shot Result: another fizzle? Ratiomatic has revived, pressure is high around 0.1mTorr. No gas jet. Maybe fd interlock actually took them out this time Next: reduce pg4 back to 18msec and repeat |
| Sep 11 2012 04:17:13:027PM | 1120911018 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#18: reduce pg4 back to 18msec and repeat Load at 11-Sep-2012 15:43:32.00 Open tree /home/wolfe/pcs_scratch -1 Open tree done IGT=1.4e-6 at INIT, hope I didn't lower pg4 too much Result: wmhd=123kJ, rf fault (J) early but mostly recovered Ratiomatic is reading .07mTorr at breakdown Next: continue the scan, back to nominally no stagger |
| Sep 11 2012 04:27:05:563PM | 1120911019 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#19: continue the scan, back to nominally no stagger No pcs changes IGT=2.5e-6 at 28minutes Result: rf faults early in pulse, wmhd=121kJ Next: small change in F jet timing |
| Sep 11 2012 04:57:00:457PM | 1120911020 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#20: small change in F jet timing, no PCS changes IGT=2.3e-6 at 28minutes before going to INIT Result: fizzle. Ratiomatic is at .09mTorr Gas jet fired, but did not runaway. Will try for one more. Next: reduce pg4 from 18 to 16msec |
| Sep 11 2012 05:18:56:453PM | 1120911021 | Steve Wolfe | Shot#21: small change in F jet timing, reduce pg4 from 18 to 16msec Load at 11-Sep-2012 16:57:50.00 Open tree /home/wolfe/pcs_scratch -1 Open tree done IGT=1.9e-6 at 19 minutes before INIT This will be the last shot of the day, regardless Result: disrupted on schedule, jets both went Wmhd=125kJ, with a positive Wdot;J RF fault half-way through the RF pulse End of Run |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 07:22:14:890AM | Test | Ok | |
| 2 | 08:59:57:597AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 09:19:14:983AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 09:39:04:453AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 10:02:37:087AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 10:21:39:220AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 10:39:23:600AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 11:03:52:963AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 11:24:04:460AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 12:11:57:823PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 12:38:38:510PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 01:01:07:287PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 01:41:58:730PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 02:14:18:583PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 02:46:03:880PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 03:07:25:830PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 03:38:09:953PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 03:50:38:170PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 04:21:28:660PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 04:52:22:623PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 05:14:02:473PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| System Availability | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sep 11 2012 07:21:55:763AM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||