| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Theodore Golfinopoulos,Bob Mumgaard,Chi Gao |
| Physics operator(s): | Ian Hutchinson,Jerry Hughes,Ian Hutchinson |
| Engineering operator(s): | Bill Parkin,Bill Cochran,Bill Byford |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| MP719 SL Theodore Golfinopoulos, MP 702 2pm-4pm Chi Gao PO Ian Hutchinso |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Entered: Sep 25 2012 03:38:18:577PM |
| Author: Chi Gao |
| MP 702: Cold pulse modulation experiments (2 hours: 2pm-4pm)
SL: cgao PO: hutchinson This 2 hours run is to recover the lost data of 1120919. put 1.5 psi Ar in B-SIDE-LOWER at 0.3s for 200ms for HIREX-Sr Target plasma: LSN nl04: 0.8*1e20, 0.5*1e20, 0.7*1e20 Ip = 0.8,1.1MA. Bt = 5.45 T ================ Shot Plan =============================================== (1) steady density with current scan: 6 shots --(a)x2 Ip = 0.8MA, Bt = 5.4T nl04 ~ 0.80 ref: 1120106010 --(b)x2 Ip = 1.1MA, Bt = 5.4T nl04 ~ 0.50 ref: 1120720019 --(c)x2 Ip = 1.1MA, Bt = 5.4T nl04 ~ 0.70 (2) time permits: 1-2 shots. Locked mode. This part will be tough.ref: try from seg 4 of 1120830005. |
| Entered: Sep 25 2012 08:34:12:167PM |
| Author: Theodore Golfinopoulos |
| MP719
Goals: 1. Establish ohmic EDA H-mode in reversed field, upper single null plasma 2. Run Shoelace antenna in phase-lock mode; modulate mode/antenna-drive phase in real-time during shot using new hardware 3. Run mirror probe; see if we observe antenna response on this probe. Boronization: half boronization overnight 2 hours of ECDC in helium on morning prior to run, standard parameters. Field range: 3.5-5 T Current range: 700-900 kA No ICRF (Yijun Lin will have short pulse to test J antenna 50-100 ms, 100-200 kW, either at 1.6 or 0.5 s) No DNB No LH Cryo pump on standby Diagnostics: Required: Mirnov coils, PCI, polarimeter, differential TCI, reflectometer, Edge Thomson, GPI. Desired: edge reflectometer Reference shot: 1120831026 (minus disruption) |
| Entered: Sep 26 2012 10:27:45:873AM |
| Author: Bob Mumgaard |
| Today from 1pm~2pm of the run we will take some beam into gas w/ fields shots as part of calibrating/characterizing the MSE diagnostic. This is (loosely) part of MP647.
MP 647: Evaluation of MSE issues SL: Mumgaard PO: Wolfe We have drawn several conclusions from previous data in quiescent ohmic shots this campaign. Below is the conclusion and proposes some tests to further illicidate them: Conclusion 1) The statisical variation in the MSE polarization angle measured from the beam is higher than we expect. When looking at the ISC during a discharge the statistical uncertainty scales nearly properly with signal level and is what we expect from previous measurements made invessel. However, when viewing the beam, for a given signal level the variability of the polarization angle is a factor of 2-3 larger than what we get from the ISC in similar conditions. Uncertainty due to background subtraction does not account for the discrepency for most shots leading us to suspect something in the beam is fluctuating causing the polarization angle to fluctuate. We don't know what this could be. We would like to rule out problems with background subtraction. Proposed experiment: Look at beam into gas w/ fields thereby eliminating the polarized background. Measure the variability in the polarization angle from the beam and compare to the variability from the ISC and invessel experiments at similar signal levels. 2) Althought the polarization uncertainty during the beam pulse is higher than expected it does behave statistically within a given pulse but not beam pulse to beam pulse. Dividing up the pulse into different bin sizes and comparing the variation within a pulse shows that the standard error properly describes the variation of the polarization angle within the beam pulse. However, between adjacent beam pulses the polarization angle changes outside of this standard error by a factor of 2-3 in quiessent plasmas. This looks as if everytime the beam fires something changes in the velocity disrupution or pointing angle of the beam (keep in mind we're worrying about things on the 0.05deg level). We would like to see if this conclusion holds for beam pulse trains significantly different than what we usually run, this could give clues to what might be changing. Proposed experiment: Change the beam modulation during a beam into gas w/ fields. Compare the variabilty of a unmodulated beam with one with only infrequent modulation and one with the standard modulation. Bin the data different ways and see if the above conclusion continues to hold as we exend the beam on periods. 3) We do not know how the variability of the beam polarization angle scales with MSE signal level. In order to obtain this we need to keep the beam at constant parameters but vary the signal level by varying the excitation of the beam. Proposed experiment: Beam into gas w/ fields with a torus pressure scan within the discharge. This will change the excitation and attenuation of the beam and thus change the signal level allowing us to determine how the variability in beam polarization angle scales with photon rate. The proposed experiments encompass 4 beam into gas w/ field shots: 1) A normal modulated beam at constant pressure and field 2) A partly modulated beam into gas at constant pressure and field 3) An unmodulated beam at constant pressure and field 4) A normal modulated beam with a gas pressure scan at constant field The gas pressure is specified to maximize the MSE signal The vertical field is specified to minimize the effect of secondary neutral emission ==============REQUIRED SUBSYSTEMS================= DNB (will not run without) no plasma ============Required Diagnostics================== MSE-DNB w/ ISC enabled g-side mks DNB tank and duct mks DNB spectrometer ============Desired Diagnostics================== BES fibers into Kaiser spectrometer ============Gas setup================== Working gas species: D2 Disable all gas except fueling ================ Shot Plan =============================================== + + + Take a few DNB shots into the calorimeter with the following timings to condition the beam up: Timing 1: Start at 0.1s 80ms on, 20ms off 14 pulses Timing 2: Start at 0.1s 300ms on, 20ms off 4 pulses Timing 3: Start at 0.1s 1500ms on, 0ms off 1 pulse Note on length of beam. Take the best performance acheivable from the previous day. + + + + TF field to 5.4T Shot 1: engineering setup from 1070529010 Reference shot /home/sscott/pcs/1120926101 Enable only pg4, turn ninja off. TORVAC set up for Torus Valves closed in pulse Goal gas pressure: 0.8mTorr. Beam timing 1 Shot 2: No power shot, beam into gas w/o fields Beam timing 1 Shot 3: No changes to gas or fields setup from shot 1 Beam timing 2 Shot 4: No changes to gas or fields Beam timing 3 Shot 5: No changes to fields Goal: Gas pressure scan within a shot from ~0.5mtorr to 2.5mtor See shot 1070529008 for timing beam timing 3 Shot 6: No power shot beam into gas w/o fields with same gas timing as shot 5 Total of 4 power shots and 2 no power shots After the run take a few beam into calorimeter shots with the different timings and with the bending magnet on/off |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Entered: Sep 25 2012 04:52:02:480PM |
| Author: Ian Hutchinson |
| Plan: Try to cope with demands of multiple MPs...
Run begins at 09:00 and ends at 18:00 Power systems as on: 1120831026 Gas setup: Nothing new Enable gate-valves and shutters: ECE Torvac gatevalve toggle (yes/no): no Boronization(yes/no): YES Overnight ECDC (yes/no): ECDC for at least 2 hours after boronization. ICRF(yes/no): no LH(yes/no): no Cryopump (yes/no): no DNB (yes/no): no |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Sep 26 2012 02:56:39:820PM |
| Author: Theodore Golfinopoulos |
| MP719
Summary for first half of run, Shots 1-19 (First plasma attempt was on Shot 3) The primary goal of today's run was to achieve a steady EDA H-mode, and then exercise the phase lock system, including the new phase delay board. Only Shot 3 exhibited steady QCMs, however - this shot had an unusually high density (the transition to H-mode happened around NL04=1.4E20 m^-2). While we achieved H-modes throughout the day, none had a strong enough QCM such that we could lock to it. Bumping the field up did not improve the situation, though a field swing downward did seem to aid the transition into H-mode. We benefitted from 40 ms pulses of ICRF at 0.7 s starting on Shot 16 - these seem to trigger H-modes on several shots. On the other hand, the Shoelace frequency modulation waveform appeared regularly on both PCI and polarimetry. This reproduces what we had seen on 1120814. The half run on 1120831, which did not benefit from boronization and which did not have long-lived H-modes, did not show density fluctuations from the antenna. We recovered from two faults between yesterday and today: (1) a drop in antenna inductance from 6 uH to 4 uH, as well as a reduction in resistance, and (2) a CAMAC issue that intermittently eliminated, essentially, our VCO output. We think the change in antenna impedance may be resulting from a short on the antenna, perhaps eliminating a few of the upper rungs on the antenna. Joe Bosco determined that the CAMAC fault was localized to another crate around C port containing triggers for some spectroscopy diagnostics, particularly D_alpha. After this crate was turned off, we were able to measure the antenna impedance using a LeCroy 'scope. The following morning, after boronization had finished, we retuned the matching network calibration using the new impedance measurement. This allowed antenna performance at nearly normal operational levels (i.e. 70 to 80 A in the antenna). Thanks to Physics Operators, Ian Hutchinson and Jerry Hughes, and the whole crew. |
| Entered: Sep 26 2012 05:29:44:577PM |
| Author: Chi Gao |
| Run summary of 1120921 (MP702. 2 hours)
We had 10 shots today(#25-#34) 3 disruptions: #29(0.67s), #31(0.255s), #33(1.25s) 1 fizzle: #30 6 full plasmas: #25,#26,#27,#28,#32,#34 #25: no LBO injection #28: No TS #32: No HiReX #26,#28,#32,#33,#34 are good shots for analysis.(although there are some diagnostics missing for some shots...) (1) Ip = 0.8MA. #26: nl04=0.8.nl04=0.8. Good SOC and pure diffusion. (2) Ip = 1.1MA. #27: nl04=0.8.nl04=0.8. LOC. This shot was intended to have nel04~0.4, but density was higher, probably due to the boronization. #28: nl04 = 0.5-0.7. LOC. Core Te increase. No TS this shot #32: nl04 = 0.6. Good LOC. Lost HiReX #33: nl04 = 0.75. Good LOC. There are some interesting magnetic fluctuation before the locked disruptions (#29 and #33). Ted will take a look at them. |
| Entered: Sep 27 2012 07:34:58:247PM |
| Author: Bob Mumgaard |
| Today we performed a short beam into gas w/ fields experiment.
The goal was to judge how the MSE signal statistics scale with beam pulse length and signal level. Previous analysis on beam into plasma data showed a larger variability in the measured polarization level than expected and a beam pulse-beam pulse dependence. The fields and gas programing was precisely what we asked for. However, we were able to get 2 of the 4 requested conditions before the beam started to have HV faults in the inverter system which significantly limited its reliability and moved the spectrum out of the MSE bandpass filters. The data obtained on the 3 good shots (1120927020, 21, 22) will allow us to answer a few of the questions this experiment was designed to target. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Sep 26 2012 12:37:18:670PM |
| Author: Jerry Hughes |
| I was PO from shots 9 through 16 today, for MP719. Shots were all USN, reversed
field, with low-field startup. Ian handled most of the set up for these. Mostly I adjusted TF and nl04 programming to try to optimize H-mode access and quality for the SL. These discharges had a few issues. Shots 13 and 14 both disrupted early. These I attributed mainly to crud falling in during and shortly after ramp-up. Note that the large H-L transitions on these shots have a tendency to lead to disruptions. Shot 10 had a massive snake following the H-L. |
| Entered: Sep 26 2012 04:45:10:330PM |
| Author: Ian Hutchinson |
| Summary
-------- MPs were completed as required. Finished 18 minutes early (not 1 hour early as scheduled). No scorecard for today because the code does not work well with the many null shots at the beginning and middle of the day. |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Sep 26 2012 09:30:33:280AM | 1120926003 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace Parameters
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=110 kHz, DeltaF=20 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 Phase Lock and Phase Delay: Disabled Result: Great first shot! 4 H-modes, each with QCM. Antenna ran between 70 and 80 A - up around where it should be. |
| Sep 26 2012 09:48:16:670AM | 1120926004 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace Parameters:
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=125 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: Disabled Result: Plasma dies at 0.15 s Next: try again |
| Sep 26 2012 09:56:39:970AM | 1120926005 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace parameters: unchanged from last shot
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=125 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: Disabled Result: H-mode with huge density rise. Get weak activity in QCM band until around 1.47 s, at which point a coherent QCM appears (and QCM_DETECT goes high). Shoelace is visible on BP_EF_BOT, for example, before the H-mode. Next: Same. |
| Sep 26 2012 10:10:39:653AM | 1120926006 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace parameters: unchanged from last shot
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=125 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: Disabled Result: H-mode late in shot. Again, QCM appears very late - around 1.6 s, between 60 and 110 kHz. There are several peaks in the QCM spectrum in this band. Some weak modes before that - Washboards? Antenna ran between 70 and 80 A - in the correct range. Next: changed Shoelace frequency range from 90 to 140 kHz. Otherwise, same Shoelace parameters. |
| Sep 26 2012 10:30:20:900AM | 1120926007 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace parameters: lower frequency range
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=115 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: Disabled Result: Similar to last shot - H-mode late in shot. QCM detect does not go high. Next: increase density to reproduce EDA's of Shot 3 |
| Sep 26 2012 10:50:30:427AM | 1120926008 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace parameters: unchanged from last shot
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=115 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: Disabled Result: disruption early H-mode this time, around 0.45 s The Shoelace antenna is visible on PCI (e.g. Channels 28 and 29, maybe others) and polarimeter Channel FROT_03. QCM_DETECT does not go high during this shot. After this shot, went into cell and reset Master Control Board, since tuning number outputs were not coming out once again. Next: try to squeeze RGAP down to 2 mm. |
| Sep 26 2012 11:06:38:337AM | 1120926009 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace parameters: unchanged from last shot
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=115 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: Disabled Problem with PCI phase plate, causing jitter. Shoelace is visible on PCI and polarimeter Next: enable phase lock, phase modulation 0 to 180 degrees, 10 Hz square wave |
| Sep 26 2012 10:59:45:890AM | 1120926010 | Steve Scott | Interestingly on this shot, the plasma falls out of Hmode at about 0.99 sec and the Nel immediately starts to decrease, but Neo from Thomson continues to INCREASE up to nearly 6.e20 at t=1.08 sec, and the neutron emission also increases substantially over that time period. |
| Sep 26 2012 11:08:30:730AM | 1120926010 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace parameters: phase lock enabled
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=115 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: 0-180 degree square wave modulation at 10 Hz Result: got two H-modes. Not quite EDA-ish - there is activity in the QCM band, but it doesn't look like a regular QCM, and we don't lock to it (i.e. QCM_DETECT stays low). Next: bump field from 3.6 to 4.0 T at 0.75 s to try to get a more EDA-ish H-mode |
| Sep 26 2012 11:22:47:383AM | 1120926011 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace parameters: phase lock enabled
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=115 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: 0-180 degree square wave modulation at 10 Hz Result: Two H-modes, first around 0.8 s, second around 1.4 s. There may be a brief period of cleaner QCM, but it seems to be short-lived such that QCM_DETECT stays low (PLL hysteresis). Antenna running on its frequency scan as expected. Antenna is visible on a few channels of PCI, less clear on polarimeter. Next: Increase density, try to hit NL04=1.2E20 early, bump field even higher - up to 4.5 T |
| Sep 26 2012 11:41:18:597AM | 1120926012 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace parameters: same as last shot
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=115 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: 0-180 degree square wave modulation at 10 Hz Maybe a bit more EDA-ish - an intermittent QCM coming down in frequency later in the shot with the H-mode. There is a triangle-like bright excursion in PCI in the QCM band, but this does not appear to be at the Shoelace frequency Next: swing down in field, then swing up to 4.5 again at 0.85 s. |
| Sep 26 2012 11:55:44:830AM | 1120926013 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace parameters: same as last shot
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=115 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: 0-180 degree square wave modulation at 10 Hz Result: Early disruption around 0.347 s Next: try again with same plasma. Change phase modulation: Stair-step phase modulation, 0,90,180,90,0,-90,-180,0,... at 4 Hz. |
| Sep 26 2012 11:55:37:930AM | 1120926014 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace parameters: stair-step phase modulation; otherwise, same as last shot
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=115 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: Stair-step phase modulation, 0,90,180,90,0,-90,-180,0,... at 4 Hz. Result: Plasma is lost at 0.10 s Next: try again. |
| Sep 26 2012 12:26:10:220PM | 1120926015 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace parameters: same as last shot
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=115 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: Stair-step phase modulation, 0,90,180,90,0,-90,-180,0,... at 4 Hz. Result: 3 H modes. Last one is promising. First one seems to be induced by Yijun Lin's ICRF tests with J antenna. Next: Move ICRF pulse to 0.7 s at same power level to try to kick an H-mode. |
| Sep 26 2012 12:31:54:757PM | 1120926016 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace parameters: same as last shot
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=115 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: Stair-step phase modulation, 0,90,180,90,0,-90,-180,0,... at 4 Hz. Result: 3 H-modes, first seems to be induced by ICRF pulse, but doesn't last long enough for the field bump at 0.95 s. Still no QCM's for any substantial amount of time. There is a nice H-mode in rampdown. Note: also had a deuterium puff for Christian Theiller at 1.2 s - I wonder if corresponding density rise contributed to second H-mode. Next: Advance bump in B_T forward in time to 0.8 s. |
| Sep 26 2012 12:54:30:850PM | 1120926017 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace parameters: move Shoelace pulse to 0.6-1.6 s to try to catch H-mode in rampdown; increase phase modulation frequency
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=115 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: Stair-step phase modulation, 0,90,180,90,0,-90,-180,0,... at 6 Hz. Result: get an H-mode around 0.77 s; a few shallow partial density drop outs afterward. There is a density rise around 1.2 s, perhaps corresponding to the Ninja puff, but there is also a transition at 1.19 s where the "QCM" disappears Next: increase density, puff earlier. |
| Sep 26 2012 12:57:18:150PM | 1120926018 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace parameters: same as last shot
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=115 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: Stair-step phase modulation, 0,90,180,90,0,-90,-180,0,... at 6 Hz. Result: very similar to last shot. A density ramp starts around 1.1 s, before NINJA puff. Still no steady QCM. Next: advance the field bump earlier in time, and reduce its height. |
| Sep 26 2012 01:05:13:027PM | 1120926019 | Theodore Golfinopoulos | Shoelace parameters: same as last shot
Freq: triangle wave sweep, fm=10 Hz, f0=115 kHz, DeltaF=25 kHz Amp: amp_wave_w max=200 - unchanged from last shot Phase Lock and Phase Delay: Stair-step phase modulation, 0,90,180,90,0,-90,-180,0,... at 6 Hz. Result: disruption around 0.94 s. Short H-mode early - doesn't quite look like an EDA H-mode, though there is activity in the QCM band during the RF pulse. Shoelace is visible on PCI. Next: changeover to new MP under Bob Mumgaard. That's all from us, folks. Thanks. |
| Sep 26 2012 01:29:27:463PM | 1120926020 | Bob Mumgaard | First shot in the scan.
MSE polychromator disabled. MSE in nominal configuration with HV at 1750/1750/1750/1750 First shot will be beam at 80/20. Beam, fields, gas, look good. Next we'll change the timing to timing 2. We will forgo the beam into gas without fields. |
| Sep 26 2012 01:44:14:993PM | 1120926021 | Bob Mumgaard | Goal: Change the beam timing to the longer pulses, timing 2. DNB fires a test shot into C-Mod before this pulse (1120926325).
Beam's 3rd and 4th pulses were no good. Inverters fault out. Beam fires into the machine to see if its recoverable, 326 Looks like we need to drop the arc current. 327 looses a single invertor. Drop the arc current further. Next: Repeat, this time with the a good beam. |
| Sep 26 2012 02:01:45:610PM | 1120926022 | Bob Mumgaard | Didn't get the beam to go the whole time. We have 2 good pulses.
Take a few shots in between the cmod shot. Decided to move onto the long pulse. Take a test shot into the torus, we loose a few inverters early. Drop the arc current down to 3.1 and shorten to 1.2s. |
| Sep 26 2012 02:07:59:430PM | 1120926023 | Bob Mumgaard | Goal: Long single pulse of DNB.
Didn't get it, faults out early. Next: Move to the last shot, normal modulation with a pressure scan within a shot. Load gas from 1070529008. Change beam timing back to 80/20. |
| Sep 26 2012 02:18:56:817PM | 1120926024 | Bob Mumgaard | Beam faults out.
Pressure good. Give up the machine. And on the beam. |
| Sep 26 2012 03:41:30:897PM | 1120926025 | Chi Gao | plan: 5.4T, 0.8MA, nl04=0.8.
result: Full plasma. No LBO. HiReX signal ok. Next: Repeat |
| Sep 26 2012 03:02:23:237PM | 1120926026 | Chi Gao | plan: 5.4T, 0.8MA, nl04=0.8.
result: Good SOC. Core Te decrease. Next: 5.4T, 1.1MA, nl04=0.5 |
| Sep 26 2012 03:41:19:987PM | 1120926027 | Chi Gao | plan: 5.4T,1.1MA, nl04=0.5
result: nl04 goes to 0.8~0.9. LOC.Core Te increase. Next: Repeat. 5.4T,1.1MA, nl04=0.5 |
| Sep 26 2012 03:26:55:780PM | 1120926028 | Chi Gao | plan: 5.4T,1.1MA, nl04=0.5
result: nl04 goes to 0.5~0.7. LOC.Core Te increase. No TS this shot Next: Repeat. 5.4T, 1.1MA, nl04=0.5 |
| Sep 26 2012 03:57:27:080PM | 1120926029 | Chi Gao | plan: 5.4T,1.1MA, nl04=0.5
result: Locked at 0.6s and disrupted at 0.67s. Next: go to higher density. 5.4T, 1.1MA, nl04=0.6 ![]() |
| Sep 26 2012 03:56:02:277PM | 1120926030 | Chi Gao | plan: 5.4T,1.1MA, nl04=0.6
result: fizzle, as "expected" Next: Repeat. 5.4T, 1.1MA, nl04=0.6 |
| Sep 26 2012 04:09:16:390PM | 1120926031 | Chi Gao | plan: 5.4T,1.1MA, nl04=0.6
result: disrupted at 0.255s. Prad is high Next: Repeat. 5.4T, 1.1MA, nl04=0.6 |
| Sep 26 2012 04:21:33:583PM | 1120926032 | Chi Gao | plan: 5.4T,1.1MA, nl04=0.6
result: good shot. Core Te increase, BUT HIREX module 2-3 got lost.. I should have noticed this from shot 31 Next: Repeat. 5.4T, 1.1MA, nl04=0.6 |
| Sep 26 2012 04:33:05:553PM | 1120926033 | Chi Gao | plan: 5.4T,1.1MA, nl04=0.6
result: Good shot. Core Te increase. Locked at 1.25s and disrupted at 1.33s Next: go to higher density. 5.4T,1.1MA, nl04=0.8 |
| Sep 26 2012 04:43:48:720PM | 1120926034 | Chi Gao | plan: 5.4T,1.1MA, nl04=0.75
result: Good shot. Core Te increase. End of the run |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Sep 26 2012 08:45:31:787AM | Ian Hutchinson | Load from 1120831026. It has segment 1 and 2 in use.
Fill puff is 25ms. The plasma shape is poorly controlled during plasma current ramp. It is limited for much of the time till 400ms, even though at 200ms it is nicely diverted (if a little bit vertically challenged). This appears to be deliberate because clearin is drawn at -0,03. According to SLs this is not desired or required. Also the Ip gain is ridiculously low during the first half second. And ICEF4 gain is staying up at 5 till 0.5s. Load from 1120914030 to look at stuff. Clearin ramps from -0.03 to 0 during .12 to .2s. gain is 5 stepping to 9. Ip gain is low. 0.3 till .55s. ICEF4 is similar.So main difference is clearin. Changes. Load from 1120831026. Set clearin to zero at .22s Rcur seems to be very low in the current ramp. Then ramps out to 0.6677. Draw further out 0.66 at .18s. Ip gain raise to 5 at .35s. Set zxu to -0.01, was just above zero. Rcur to .666 at .325s and keep it there. About 1.5mm in from where it started. Load | |
| Sep 26 2012 09:10:32:060AM | 1120926001 | Ian Hutchinson | No power test. |
| Sep 26 2012 09:10:02:910AM | 1120926002 | Ian Hutchinson | No power test shot
Lower nl04 demand to 0.8e20. Also lower at 0.13s to reduce initial puff. Load Worry about data system. But the bus rogowskis look ok at the bit noise level. |
| Sep 26 2012 09:28:51:097AM | 1120926003 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma disrupts at 1.6s.
Lower nl04 gain from 4 to 2. Remove the big step in the Rcur at the flat top end. It seems to be the cause of the disruption. Load. |
| Sep 26 2012 09:40:54:660AM | 1120926004 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma to .15s. Radiates itself to death.
No changes. Try to see what happened. Initial gas puff might be a bit too much. There's 90ms of trailing puff at the level of 20. |
| Sep 26 2012 09:56:49:093AM | 1120926005 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma to 1.65s
Turn initial gas puff off at 50ms. Nl04 derivative gain to 5 in segment 2. Load. |
| Sep 26 2012 10:15:59:497AM | 1120926006 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma to 1.73s. H-mode rather late, perhaps it liked the higher density.
Much decrease the rcur movement during rampdown. Raise nl04 to 1e20 Turn on gain on Ip up to 1 at 60ms. |
| Sep 26 2012 12:25:33:630PM | 1120926007 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma to rampdown.
Ramp zxu down faster and stronger. nl04 to 1.2e20 Segment 1 Ip gain to 1.6 Load |
| Sep 26 2012 10:28:54:987AM | 1120926008 | Jerry Hughes |
Taking over for Ian, beginning with shot 9. Shot 8 was an early disruption, seems to have resulted from the unwanted H-L transition. |
| Sep 26 2012 10:49:41:873AM | 1120926009 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 9.
PO changes: In seg2, reduce nl04 demand at 0.3 from 1.2e20 to 1.0e20. Leave in ramp up to 1.2e20 by 0.6s. In seg2, adjust RCUR to 0.667 in flattop (from 0.666) In seg1, adjust prefill from 26ms to 24ms to try to accommodate the disruption on shot 8. Load at 26-Sep-2012 10:39:18.00 Open tree /home/jwhughes/physop/pcs_scratch -1 Open tree done Result: RGAP is down to ~2mm, as requested. Density is as demanded, and L-H is delayed to 0.73s Still have an H-L which leads to a disruption at 1.17s. |
| Sep 26 2012 11:00:41:473AM | 1120926010 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 10.
No PO changes. Result: Ohmic H-mode again, with H-L transition. Big MHD obvious on the soft x-rays, nl04. But, it does go into rampdown, with another Ohmic H-mode. |
| Sep 26 2012 11:16:38:840AM | 1120926011 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 11
PO changes. SL requests a TF jump to 4.0T beginning at 0.75s In Seg2, step TF demand from 98000 to 108900A at 0.752s Load at 26-Sep-2012 11:06:14.00 Open tree /home/jwhughes/physop/pcs_scratch -1 Open tree done Result: Couple of Ohmic H-modes. The first one is triggered after the Bt jog to 4.0T. |
| Sep 26 2012 11:25:59:400AM | 1120926012 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 12
PO changes: In Seg 2, get nl04 up to 1.2e20 by 0.56s and keep it there. In Seg 2, set TF demand from 108900A to 124000A starting from 0.752s. Load at 26-Sep-2012 11:19:18.00 Open tree /home/jwhughes/physop/pcs_scratch -1 Open tree done Result: Plasma into rampdown. H-mode late. nl04 is a bit lower than programmed. |
| Sep 26 2012 11:43:10:897AM | 1120926013 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 13
PO changes Bump TF down to 87100A at 0.65 and then up to 124000A at 0.85s. Load at 26-Sep-2012 11:34:51.00 Open tree /home/jwhughes/physop/pcs_scratch -1 Open tree done Result: Plasma didn't make it to any of the programmed field waggles. Disrupted at 0.35s. Something fell in? |
| Sep 26 2012 12:03:58:517PM | 1120926014 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 14.
No PO changes. Result: Gets into trouble early, like 0.04s. High Prad and arrested current rise. Disrupts at 0.1s. Startup looks very similar, perhaps plasma is not pushing out as much. |
| Sep 26 2012 12:12:13:293PM | 1120926015 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 15.
No PO changes. Fingers crossed. Result: runs this time. Good startup this time, with my doing nothing. 3 H-modes, first one Rf triggered, last two Ohmic. |
| Sep 26 2012 12:27:59:643PM | 1120926016 | Jerry Hughes | Shot 16.
Set up, then Ian will take over. Changes: Remove drop in Bt. Have jump in TF occur at 0.95s. Load at 26-Sep-2012 12:15:57.00 Open tree /home/jwhughes/physop/pcs_scratch -1 Open tree done Result: Shot behaves well, full length. RF triggered H-mode isn't sustained very long. |
| Sep 26 2012 12:39:16:490PM | 1120926016 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma to rampdown.
Load from shot 16. Move Bt rampup to .8s from .95s |
| Sep 26 2012 12:51:23:300PM | 1120926017 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma to rampdown.
Raise nl04 to 1.2 at .35s |
| Sep 26 2012 01:01:40:300PM | 1120926018 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma to rampdown.
Bt ramp start at .7s only to 112kA rather than 124kA. |
| Sep 26 2012 01:31:01:880PM | 1120926019 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma disrupts at .93s.
Switch to beam into gas part of the day. Load from the shot that SScott developed in /home/sscott/pcs/ Looks correct. Load. |
| Sep 26 2012 01:34:32:540PM | 1120926020 | Ian Hutchinson | Beam into gas shot. Successful.
No changes |
| Sep 26 2012 01:49:35:400PM | 1120926021 | Ian Hutchinson | Beam into gas. Machine currents were correct. |
| Sep 26 2012 02:05:47:733PM | 1120926022 | Ian Hutchinson | Beam into gas. Machine currents were correct. Still beam problems. |
| Sep 26 2012 02:17:20:397PM | 1120926023 | Ian Hutchinson | Beam into gas. Machine currents were correct.
Import segment 1 from 1070529008. Copy the PG4 programming from that to segment one of today's shot. Load. |
| Sep 26 2012 02:17:33:140PM | 1120926024 | Ian Hutchinson | Currents ok. |
| Sep 26 2012 02:40:48:367PM | 1120926025 | Ian Hutchinson | Moving to the Chi Gao MP. Reconstruct the shot that Jerry Hughes had
constructed last week, because the data for that shot was lost. Load from 1120907028. Ip to 0.8MA TF to 153kA PG1 at 100 from .3 to .5s. NL04 TO .8E20 Load Plasma to rampdown. Impurity injector had a problem and did not fire. |
| Sep 26 2012 03:03:12:527PM | 1120926026 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma to rampdown. Many repetitive impurity blow-offs.
nl04 to 0.5e20 Ip to 1.1MA Load |
| Sep 26 2012 03:20:53:600PM | 1120926027 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma to rampdown.
Got substantially higher density than programmed. Reduce PG3 initial puff to zero by .08s. Tweak Ip rise to put more of the second ramp earlier. Load |
| Sep 26 2012 03:33:12:680PM | 1120926028 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma to rampdown. Density was lower, but still not controlled.
Reduce the PG3 early puff to height 20 from height 40. Load. |
| Sep 26 2012 03:45:32:193PM | 1120926029 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma disrupts at .68s. Appears to Lock at about 0.6s. This gives us a calibration.
PG3 early puff level to 30. nl04 to 0.6e20 Load |
| Sep 26 2012 03:58:52:047PM | 1120926030 | Ian Hutchinson | Fizzle.
Fill puff to 22ms from 42ms. I think this startup was a cryopumped one, even though it _says_ noncryo. |
| Sep 26 2012 04:10:54:507PM | 1120926031 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma disrupts at .24s. Hit by a brick, but after things seem to get resistive.
No changes. |
| Sep 26 2012 04:27:13:210PM | 1120926032 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma. Reasonably steady density.
Drop nl04 gain to 3 from 4. Derivative to 10 (from 6) Seg 1 initial PG3 puff to level 40 Load |
| Sep 26 2012 04:43:18:993PM | 1120926033 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma disrupts at 1.32s. Locks at about 1.23s
nl04 to .8e20 |
| Sep 26 2012 04:43:43:257PM | 1120926034 | Ian Hutchinson | Plasma to rampdown. Trophy shot at nl07=.7e20. |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 07:41:18:220AM | Test | Bad | Camac 2 server fail |
| 2 | 09:02:17:190AM | Test | Ok | |
| 3 | 09:11:47:890AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 09:25:43:627AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 09:39:00:590AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 09:54:26:020AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 10:08:42:753AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 10:21:26:073AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 10:39:53:637AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 10:52:26:340AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 11:06:55:723AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 11:21:33:540AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 11:35:47:623AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 11:49:00:660AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 12:03:16:783PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 12:17:37:250PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 12:30:48:287PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 12:44:21:117PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 12:58:49:587PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 01:21:50:377PM | Test | Ok | |
| 21 | 01:34:21:737PM | Test | Ok | |
| 22 | 01:46:51:503PM | Test | Ok | |
| 23 | 02:00:09:363PM | Test | Ok | |
| 24 | 02:13:33:447PM | Test | Ok | |
| 25 | 02:32:36:497PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 02:46:02:177PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 03:01:15:163PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 03:15:51:607PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 03:31:02:480PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 30 | 03:43:34:730PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 31 | 03:56:05:387PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 32 | 04:11:43:920PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 33 | 04:25:04:050PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 34 | 04:38:19:320PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| System Availability | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sep 26 2012 07:40:58:080AM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||