| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | John Goetz |
| Physics operator(s): | Unknown |
| Engineering operator(s): | Unknown |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| Plasma position and shape control; test of OH2 will use some shots but n |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:07:900PM |
| Author: To Be Determined |
| A leak opened up in the vacuum around 8:30 am when the cooling was turned on again to prepare for the run. The leak showed up as almost all nitrogen, although that may be an air leak. It may have been related to the freezing of the G-bottom, which arose because a heater had been left disconnected. This must not happen. Whoever was responsible, don't do it again. The leak did not disappear but remained in the low 10^-7 range partial pressure of nitrogen even after unfreezing the port. Therefore no attempts at plasma were undertaken. Instead, various power tests were done. Also ECDC between shots, under manual control, was successfully tested. It was established by deliberately inducing a commutation failure that at the present voltages, OH2 is able to protect itself against overcurrent via the PLC-set current limits. The test showed OH2 limitation at 18kA, the set limit. Danger still exists if OH2 were to fail to invert to protect itself. OH2 inversion does not seem to be fully reliable, as the persistent imbalance in OH2s has shown. Tests under PLC control (8-11) demonstrate OH2 PLC regulation at about 25kA but the inversion is very clearly imbalanced. OH1 under PLC control shows much the same syndrome as OH2U. It does not immediately give its full inversion voltage. Instead, when inverted from about 25kA it gives about -200V gradually increasing to -500V as the current ramps down. It is believed that the problem has been isolated and it will be worked on tonight. This is important not only because of the OH2 imbalance but also because the safest way to avoid OH2 overcurrents in the event of commutation failure is NOT to commutate OH1. That way, even if the OH2 power-supply were to autocrowbar (the worst scenario for the overcurrent problem), provided that all OH supplies autocrowbar together (which I am told is the case) there would be automatic removal of the dangerous induced voltage. OH1 voltage would be zeroed as well as OH2 so the current would not be driven up in OH2. This is in contrast to the situation where OH1 is commutated into the resistor. The resistor will continue to apply voltage regardless of the OH1 supply being autocrowbarred. If we can get the full specified inversion voltage out of OH1 then we can probably dispense with the need to commutate it. The last half hour was devoted to single coil current tests for the purposes of verifying the structure electromagnetic response. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Jun 15 1993 10:45:21:200AM | John Goetz | Outline for today's run:
1) Test OH1 and OH2 to see if higher precharge on OH1 is acceptable if OH2 fails to commutate. 2) Understand hard x-ray bursts. 3) Use EF3 for divertor work. | |
| Jun 15 1993 10:43:20:600AM | 930615002 | John Goetz | TF & OH only for engineering test. EF1 by mistake.
|
| Jun 15 1993 10:38:48:910AM | 930615003 | John Goetz | This shot is OH only to get a baseline.
|
| Jun 15 1993 11:19:11:170AM | 930615005 | John Goetz | Commutation failure induced in OH2L on purpose.
Current in OH2L rises to 18kA (PLC limit) |
| Jun 15 1993 11:19:23:680AM | 930615005 | John Goetz | Commutation failure induced in OH2L on purpose.
Current in OH2L rises to 18kA (PLC limit) |
| Jun 15 1993 11:20:14:370AM | 930615006 | John Goetz | Commutation failure induced in OH2U on purpose.
Current in OH2L rises to 19.5kA (PLC limit = 18kA) |
| Jun 15 1993 11:26:53:650AM | 930615007 | John Goetz | TF and OH's on this time.
Commutation failure induced in OH2U on purpose. Current in OH2U rises to 19.5kA (PLC limit = 18kA) TF does not seem to change the OH2U waveform between shots 006 and 007. Note: OH2L in notes for shot 006 should be OH2U. |
| Jun 15 1993 12:32:22:380PM | 930615007 | John Goetz | The previous shots were to show that the OH2's could protect themselves at
the present current level. The PLC limit was obeyed and the OH2's protected the coils. Next, the OH supplies will be run at the higher current levels, put into inversion, and then checked for commutation failures. Attempting to do ECDC between shots. OH2U and OH2L at 25kA. OH2L current limits at 24.6kA and OH2U current limits at 26.2kA No commutation faults. OH2L makes it to full inversion (-200V) but OH2U does not (-100V) |
| Jun 15 1993 12:32:34:350PM | 930615008 | John Goetz | The previous shots were to show that the OH2's could protect themselves at
the present current level. The PLC limit was obeyed and the OH2's protected the coils. Next, the OH supplies will be run at the higher current levels, put into inversion, and then checked for commutation failures. Attempting to do ECDC between shots. OH2U and OH2L at 25kA. OH2L current limits at 24.6kA and OH2U current limits at 26.2kA No commutation faults. OH2L makes it to full inversion (-200V) but OH2U does not (-100V) |
| Jun 15 1993 12:50:33:960PM | 930615009 | John Goetz | Repeat of shot 008. Try to fix the inversion discrepancy.
No changes in inversion voltages. No commutation faults. |
| Jun 15 1993 02:15:44:060PM | 930615010 | John Goetz | Engineers think they know where the OH2 inversion discrepancy lies. Needs to
be fixed offline. Error in inversion traced to loose connection. Unsure whether or not problem was fixed as it disappeared during investigation. Shot 010 stopped due to PLC hangup. |
| Jun 15 1993 02:49:35:540PM | 930615011 | John Goetz | OH2U only. Still only -80V during full inversion.
|
| Jun 15 1993 03:06:52:380PM | 930615012 | John Goetz | OH1 only. 25kA under PLC control. No commutation.
25kA from -1.5 to -1.2 sec then ramp down to 1200A. Causes unknown. |
| Jun 15 1993 03:49:47:160PM | 930615013 | John Goetz | Repeat of shot 012.
Errors of shot 012 appear to be due to the fact that the power supply was not under PLC control but under hybrid control. Pulse was indeed at 24.4kA but at inversion the supply did not go directly to full inversion (-500V). It only went to -200V. Power supply did invert correctly on shot 012. Next shot will be with a narrow pulse to see if the inversion problem is pulse width related. |
| Jun 15 1993 04:07:34:780PM | 930615015 | John Goetz | OH1 only under PLC control at 25kA.
Pulse narrower than 013. Inversion is only to -200V instead of -500V. |
| Jun 15 1993 04:29:40:870PM | 930615016 | John Goetz | OH1 only at 12kA under PLC control to check inversion behavior with no
commutation. Inversion voltage is now about -350V. |
| Jun 15 1993 04:42:02:310PM | 930615017 | John Goetz | EF1U only for Horne-Tinios tests.
|
| Jun 15 1993 04:50:21:380PM | 930615018 | John Goetz | EF2U only for Horne-Tinios tests.
|
| Jun 15 1993 05:00:04:390PM | 930615019 | John Goetz | EF2L only for Horne-Tinios tests.
|
| Physics Operator Comments |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 08:09:22:830AM | Test | Ok | Static test of OH2 OK |
| 2 | 09:53:17:150AM | Test | Ok | TF and OH test; all OK but OH2L still shows spurious commutation fault |
| 3 | 10:22:00:300AM | Test | Ok | OH test w/o TF; all OK |
| 4 | 10:39:23:120AM | Test | Bad | data system did not arm the CAMAC - data from last shot |
| 5 | 10:53:14:850AM | Test | Ok | Deliberate commutation failure in OH2 SCR switch. OK; current does not e |
| 6 | 11:06:17:810AM | Test | Ok | OH2U deliberate SCR switch comm failure. Power supplies responded OK |
| 7 | 11:21:17:740AM | Test | Ok | Test OH2 with TF; OK |
| 8 | 12:22:14:530PM | Test | Ok | 25 kA commutation test of OH2U and OH2L OK; some difference in inversion |
| 9 | 12:38:42:630PM | Test | Ok | OH2 commutation test 25 kA OK but still inversion imbalance |
| 10 | 02:10:38:670PM | Test | Ok | OH2 still unbalanced in inversion; no other problems |
| 11 | 02:41:44:600PM | Test | Ok | OH2U ONLY, still not inverting hard enough |
| 12 | 02:54:41:720PM | Test | Bad | OH1 test did not follow PLC program; instead followed hybrid program! |
| 13 | 03:36:13:910PM | Test | Ok | OH1 pul;se OK but inversion the same as problem OH2 supply |
| 14 | 03:51:04:910PM | Test | Bad | OH1 commutation was inadvertently enabled; disable during CHECK caused f |
| 15 | 04:02:30:390PM | Test | Ok | OH1 short pulse ok |
| 16 | 04:25:10:450PM | Test | Ok | OH1 12 ka test shows that current gain in inversion endstop calc is too |
| 17 | 04:39:15:000PM | Test | Ok | EF1 U test OK |
| 18 | 04:48:34:810PM | Test | Ok | EF2U test OK |
| 19 | 04:56:52:690PM | Test | Ok | EF2L test OK |
| 20 | 05:41:48:780PM | Test | Ok | josh testing data system |
| 21 | 06:58:26:190PM | Test | Ok | steve's camac problems .... |
| 22 | 07:07:43:050PM | Test | Ok | turned off 10 and 9 and 11 got fixed |
| 23 | 07:15:05:500PM | Test | Ok | still testing worked again |
| 24 | 07:20:58:060PM | Test | Bad | a missing cadf breaks the next cadf !!!! |
| 25 | 07:29:01:010PM | Test | Ok | turned off cadf_10 and it all worked again |