Alcator C-Mod Run 930615 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:
Date Filed:
Title:
First Author:
Session Leader:John Goetz (shots 1-25)

Operators
Session leader(s):John Goetz
Physics operator(s): Unknown
Engineering operator(s): Unknown

Engineering Operator Run Comment
Plasma position and shape control; test of OH2 will use some shots but n

Session Leader Plans

Physics Operators Plans

Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:07:900PM
Author: To Be Determined
A leak opened up in the vacuum around 8:30 am when the cooling was
turned on again to prepare for the run. The leak showed up as almost
all nitrogen, although that may be an air leak. It may have been
related to the freezing of the G-bottom, which arose because a heater
had been left disconnected. This must not happen. Whoever was
responsible, don't do it again.

The leak did not disappear but remained in the low 10^-7 range partial
pressure of nitrogen even after unfreezing the port. Therefore
no attempts at plasma were undertaken. Instead, various power tests
were done. Also ECDC between shots, under manual control, was
successfully tested.

It was established by deliberately inducing a commutation failure that
at the present voltages, OH2 is able to protect itself against
overcurrent via the PLC-set current limits. The test showed OH2
limitation at 18kA, the set limit.

Danger still exists if OH2 were to fail to invert to protect itself.
OH2 inversion does not seem to be fully reliable, as the persistent
imbalance in OH2s has shown. Tests under PLC control (8-11)
demonstrate OH2 PLC regulation at about 25kA but the inversion is
very clearly imbalanced.

OH1 under PLC control shows much the same syndrome as OH2U. It does
not immediately give its full inversion voltage. Instead, when
inverted from about 25kA it gives about -200V gradually increasing to
-500V as the current ramps down.

It is believed that the problem has been isolated and it will be
worked on tonight.

This is important not only because of the OH2 imbalance but also
because the safest way to avoid OH2 overcurrents in the event of
commutation failure is NOT to commutate OH1. That way, even if the OH2
power-supply were to autocrowbar (the worst scenario for the
overcurrent problem), provided that all OH supplies autocrowbar
together (which I am told is the case) there would be automatic
removal of the dangerous induced voltage. OH1 voltage would be zeroed
as well as OH2 so the current would not be driven up in OH2. This is
in contrast to the situation where OH1 is commutated into the resistor.
The resistor will continue to apply voltage regardless of the OH1
supply being autocrowbarred. If we can get the full specified
inversion voltage out of OH1 then we can probably dispense with the
need to commutate it.

The last half hour was devoted to single coil current tests for the
purposes of verifying the structure electromagnetic response.

Physics Operator Summaries

Session Leader Comments
Jun 15 1993 10:45:21:200AMJohn GoetzOutline for today's run:
1) Test OH1 and OH2 to see if higher precharge on OH1 is acceptable
if OH2 fails to commutate.
2) Understand hard x-ray bursts.
3) Use EF3 for divertor work.

Jun 15 1993 10:43:20:600AM930615002John GoetzTF & OH only for engineering test. EF1 by mistake.

Jun 15 1993 10:38:48:910AM930615003John GoetzThis shot is OH only to get a baseline.

Jun 15 1993 11:19:11:170AM930615005John GoetzCommutation failure induced in OH2L on purpose.
Current in OH2L rises to 18kA (PLC limit)

Jun 15 1993 11:19:23:680AM930615005John GoetzCommutation failure induced in OH2L on purpose.
Current in OH2L rises to 18kA (PLC limit)

Jun 15 1993 11:20:14:370AM930615006John GoetzCommutation failure induced in OH2U on purpose.
Current in OH2L rises to 19.5kA (PLC limit = 18kA)

Jun 15 1993 11:26:53:650AM930615007John GoetzTF and OH's on this time.
Commutation failure induced in OH2U on purpose.
Current in OH2U rises to 19.5kA (PLC limit = 18kA)
TF does not seem to change the OH2U waveform between shots 006 and 007.

Note: OH2L in notes for shot 006 should be OH2U.

Jun 15 1993 12:32:22:380PM930615007John GoetzThe previous shots were to show that the OH2's could protect themselves at
the present current level. The PLC limit was obeyed and the OH2's protected
the coils.

Next, the OH supplies will be run at the higher current levels,
put into inversion, and then checked for commutation failures.

Attempting to do ECDC between shots.

OH2U and OH2L at 25kA.
OH2L current limits at 24.6kA and OH2U current limits at 26.2kA
No commutation faults.
OH2L makes it to full inversion (-200V) but OH2U does not (-100V)

Jun 15 1993 12:32:34:350PM930615008John GoetzThe previous shots were to show that the OH2's could protect themselves at
the present current level. The PLC limit was obeyed and the OH2's protected
the coils.

Next, the OH supplies will be run at the higher current levels,
put into inversion, and then checked for commutation failures.

Attempting to do ECDC between shots.

OH2U and OH2L at 25kA.
OH2L current limits at 24.6kA and OH2U current limits at 26.2kA
No commutation faults.
OH2L makes it to full inversion (-200V) but OH2U does not (-100V)

Jun 15 1993 12:50:33:960PM930615009John GoetzRepeat of shot 008. Try to fix the inversion discrepancy.

No changes in inversion voltages.
No commutation faults.

Jun 15 1993 02:15:44:060PM930615010John GoetzEngineers think they know where the OH2 inversion discrepancy lies. Needs to
be fixed offline.

Error in inversion traced to loose connection. Unsure whether or not problem
was fixed as it disappeared during investigation.

Shot 010 stopped due to PLC hangup.

Jun 15 1993 02:49:35:540PM930615011John GoetzOH2U only. Still only -80V during full inversion.

Jun 15 1993 03:06:52:380PM930615012John GoetzOH1 only. 25kA under PLC control. No commutation.

25kA from -1.5 to -1.2 sec then ramp down to 1200A. Causes unknown.

Jun 15 1993 03:49:47:160PM930615013John GoetzRepeat of shot 012.

Errors of shot 012 appear to be due to the fact that the power supply was not
under PLC control but under hybrid control.

Pulse was indeed at 24.4kA but at inversion the supply did not go directly
to full inversion (-500V). It only went to -200V. Power supply did invert
correctly on shot 012.

Next shot will be with a narrow pulse to see if the inversion problem
is pulse width related.

Jun 15 1993 04:07:34:780PM930615015John GoetzOH1 only under PLC control at 25kA.

Pulse narrower than 013. Inversion is only to -200V instead of -500V.

Jun 15 1993 04:29:40:870PM930615016John GoetzOH1 only at 12kA under PLC control to check inversion behavior with no
commutation.

Inversion voltage is now about -350V.



Jun 15 1993 04:42:02:310PM930615017John GoetzEF1U only for Horne-Tinios tests.

Jun 15 1993 04:50:21:380PM930615018John GoetzEF2U only for Horne-Tinios tests.

Jun 15 1993 05:00:04:390PM930615019John GoetzEF2L only for Horne-Tinios tests.

Physics Operator Comments

Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
108:09:22:830AMTestOkStatic test of OH2 OK
209:53:17:150AMTestOkTF and OH test; all OK but OH2L still shows spurious commutation fault
310:22:00:300AMTestOkOH test w/o TF; all OK
410:39:23:120AMTestBaddata system did not arm the CAMAC - data from last shot
510:53:14:850AMTestOkDeliberate commutation failure in OH2 SCR switch. OK; current does not e
611:06:17:810AMTestOkOH2U deliberate SCR switch comm failure. Power supplies responded OK
711:21:17:740AMTestOkTest OH2 with TF; OK
812:22:14:530PMTestOk25 kA commutation test of OH2U and OH2L OK; some difference in inversion
912:38:42:630PMTestOkOH2 commutation test 25 kA OK but still inversion imbalance
1002:10:38:670PMTestOkOH2 still unbalanced in inversion; no other problems
1102:41:44:600PMTestOkOH2U ONLY, still not inverting hard enough
1202:54:41:720PMTestBadOH1 test did not follow PLC program; instead followed hybrid program!
1303:36:13:910PMTestOkOH1 pul;se OK but inversion the same as problem OH2 supply
1403:51:04:910PMTestBadOH1 commutation was inadvertently enabled; disable during CHECK caused f
1504:02:30:390PMTestOkOH1 short pulse ok
1604:25:10:450PMTestOkOH1 12 ka test shows that current gain in inversion endstop calc is too
1704:39:15:000PMTestOkEF1 U test OK
1804:48:34:810PMTestOkEF2U test OK
1904:56:52:690PMTestOkEF2L test OK
2005:41:48:780PMTestOkjosh testing data system
2106:58:26:190PMTestOksteve's camac problems ....
2207:07:43:050PMTestOkturned off 10 and 9 and 11 got fixed
2307:15:05:500PMTestOkstill testing worked again
2407:20:58:060PMTestBada missing cadf breaks the next cadf !!!!
2507:29:01:010PMTestOkturned off cadf_10 and it all worked again