Alcator C-Mod Run 930630 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:
Date Filed:
Title:
First Author:
Session Leader:Robert Granetz (shots 1-31)
Session Leader:Robert Granetz (shots 1-31)

Operators
Session leader(s):Robert Granetz,Robert Granetz
Physics operator(s):John Goetz
Engineering operator(s):Steve Fairfax

Engineering Operator Run Comment
Plasma Current feedback; low-voltage EF3

Session Leader Plans

Physics Operators Plans

Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:08:023PM
Author: To Be Determined
Summary of Run 930630

Physics Operator: Goetz
Asst. Operator: Granetz
Eng. Operator: Fairfax

The goal of this run was to demonstrate feedback of the plasma current using
OH1. Difficulties were to be expected due to the fact that OH1 is also part
of a R_CUR position controller and the demands could be in conflict. Secondary
goals developed during the run. They consisted of trying different controllers
for IP, consisting of combinations of OH1, EF1U, EF1L, OH2L, OH2U, and EF3, as
calculated by Wolfe's orthogonal controller generator code. All these
controllers are prone to the same difficulties as using OH1 alone.

Four different types of IP controllers were tried out during the run.
Controller #1: OH1 only; #2: OH1, OH2U, OH2L, and EF3; #3: OH1, OH2U,
OH2L, EF1U, EF1L, and EF3; and #4: OH1, EF1U, EF1L, and EF3. Controller #1
showed no indications of being obeyed. The suspicion is that the R_CUR
controller is winning the battle for OH1 control. Controller #2 was obeyed
when the demand current was above 300 kA. A record current of 387 kA was
achieved using this controller. This conroller has trouble with R & Z
position when it is turned on early. Controller #3 seemed to control the
flat top of the current although the magnitude was wrong. R and Z position
control with this controller suffer greatly. Controller #4 also worked for
current control. As the drawn waveform increased, so did the peak current
achieved although there was no flat top. R and Z position control with this
controller was good. For all controllers, power supplies running out of
current was the limiting factor in plasma performance.

Argon was puffed as a piggyback run. Beginning on shot 13 argon was puffed
into the machine for HIREX measurements. These plasmas had high radiated
power, high Zeff, and saturated SXR channels. Beginning on shot 20 the
argon puff was decreased with Zeff and radiated power decreasing also. After
shot 29 there was no argon puffed. Radiated power, Zeff, and SXR signals
all decreased to their pre-argon levels.

Problems:
---------
No operational hold-ups today. The engineering staff did not have to go
through the door after the EF3 tests were completed on shots 1-3. Access
control was limited to one run to the diagnostic labs to remove condensation
from the Michelson.

The unexplained oscillation in the EF3 current came and went throughout the
day EF3 turn-on timing drifted during the run. This was solved by adding
a 'reverse front-porch' to the EF3 voltage (see shot 6) to ensure that there
will be current flowing at commutation. This change in EF3 necessitates a
compensating change in the EF4 programmed current to keep Bz in the correct
range for breakdown. Care must be taken during the day to watch this
relationship.

Wall Conditioning/Vacuum:
-------------------------
ECDC was run for one and one-half hours prior to the run, ending at 08:00.
The base pressure was 4.E-6 when the run began at 09:00.

Detailed Summary:
-----------------
Shots 1-3 were engineering tests to check the board change that occured last
night. Tests were o.k. under PLC control but the mystery relay problem
nullified the hybrid test shot (3).

The day began with programming identical to shot 930629009. This shot was a
LEVP shot (low elongation, vanilla shot) with reduced EF3 voltage and a moderate
current ramp rate.

Shots 4-11 were attempts to use OH1 as the IP controller. This set of shots
was plagued by EF3 jitter and Bz changes and operator error in the tweaking
of fill pressure. Throughout these shots the programmed current level was
250kA at 100 msec, which is less current than what the ramp rate would have
achieved at 100 msec. This led the operators into the land of confusion as
the voltage demand to OH1 did not seem to be affected by the IP controller
output. Shots 8 and 10 had flat-tops of aprrox. 300kA and the M-out was
constant at -200V throughout this period from 100 to 300 msec.

Shots 12-23 were attempts to use OH1, OH2U, OH2L, and EF3 as the IP controller.
During this set of shots the drawn waveform was upped to 350kA to see if
indeed the total M out to OH1 would change. It did, proving that the hybrid
was indeed calculating the error in the correct manner. Starting with shot
18 the achieved current does track the drawn waveform in magnitude and
change in shape at the switch times. Switch times were moved from 80 to
126 msec. Moving the switch times early causes bad things to happen to the
R and Z control. As expected, the supplies ran out of current during the
attempted feedback and muddy the picture.

Shots 24-27 were attempts to use OH1, OH2U, OH2L, EF1U, EF1L, and EF3 as the
IP controller. This controller had a deleterious effect on the R and Z
position control and I would not recommend its use. The PID gain was
increased to 10 for this set of shots because the calculated M values were
too big for the controller and were divided by 10. The achieved current
scaled with the drawn demand but at no time did the current match the drawn
waveform.

Shots 28-31 were attempts to use OH1, EF1U, EF1L, and EF3 as the IP controller.
This controller was used because the EF1's still had plenty of volt-secs to
provide to the plasma. This controller did well with R and Z position control.
The drawn demand grew from 350 -> 400 -> 450 kA on shots 29-31 (shot 28 had
too much pulse gas, density rose too early) and the current achieved went
from 330 -> 350 -> 366 kA. All of these plasma currents rolled over when OH1
ran out of current. They died peaceful deaths. Inflections in the current
waveform corresponded to the switch times of the controller and the switch off
of various supplies.

Recommendations:
If I were to run this scan of IP controllers again I would start with a
LEVP with a slower current rise (see 930629013). This may allow for the
use of more volt-secs later in time and discriminate between the current
rise rate and the feedback current control.

Score-card:
-----------
3 engineering shots
22 "good" shots
5 fizzles
1 no-breakdowns
--
31 total shots

Physics Operator Summaries

Session Leader Comments
Jun 30 1993 08:40:02:410AMRobert GranetzRun 930630
Session leader: S. Goetz
Lackey: R. Granetz
Head Engineer S. Fairfax

Primary object of today's run: feedback control of plasma current using
OH1. The principle difficulty will be interactions between the demands on
OH1 for both the Ip control and the R_CUR position control.

Prior to the run we had 1.5 hours of ECDC in hydrogen. Base pressure before
the first plasma shot is 1.e-6 (because ECDC was not turned off until 08:00).

Commutation for all 5 supplies is set at t=0.000 (yes, OH1 will be commutated
today).

Supply Resistance Crowbar time
OH1 0.060 ohm 0.070 s
OH2U&L 0.013 0.120
EF1U&L 0.120 0.070
EF2 0.046

First shot will be copied from 930629009. This is a low elongation, plain
vanilla shot, with somewhat reduced EF3 voltage.


Jun 30 1993 08:40:14:960AM930630001Robert GranetzRun 930630
Session leader: S. Goetz
Lackey: R. Granetz
Head Engineer S. Fairfax

Primary object of today's run: feedback control of plasma current using
OH1. The principle difficulty will be interactions between the demands on
OH1 for both the Ip control and the R_CUR position control.

Prior to the run we had 1.5 hours of ECDC in hydrogen. Base pressure before
the first plasma shot is 1.e-6 (because ECDC was not turned off until 08:00).

Commutation for all 5 supplies is set at t=0.000 (yes, OH1 will be commutated
today).

Supply Resistance Crowbar time
OH1 0.060 ohm 0.070 s
OH2U&L 0.013 0.120
EF1U&L 0.120 0.070
EF2 0.046

First shot will be copied from 930629009. This is a low elongation, plain
vanilla shot, with somewhat reduced EF3 voltage.


Jun 30 1993 08:40:35:120AM930630001Robert GranetzTest of EF3 only.

Jun 30 1993 08:45:44:980AM930630002Robert GranetzAnother EF3 test.

Jun 30 1993 09:22:22:170AM930630003Robert GranetzEF3 test under hybrid control.

Test failed.

Jun 30 1993 09:33:28:740AM930630004Robert GranetzNice shot. Ipmax=0.26 MA, duration=0.322 s. Sawtoothing for the
entire shot. Marfe occurs earlier than normal. Current droops during
latter half of the shot.

Jun 30 1993 09:36:18:550AM930630004Robert GranetzFor the next shot, turn on feedback control of IP by setting the PID
proportional gain to 0.5, starting at 0.100 s. The programmed
demand is 250 kA until t=0.3, then rampdown in 0.1 s. The M-matrix
controller is includes only OH1 (for now). The RCUR controller also
contains OH1, along with the OH2's and EF3's.

Jun 30 1993 09:38:24:330AM930630005Robert GranetzFizzle. We didn't change anything prior to 0.100 s, so I don't think it
was due to our programming.

Jun 30 1993 09:44:59:960AM930630005Robert GranetzBz was -5 mT at breakdown, which is marginal (it was -3 mT on the
previous shot). The difference is due to the jitter problem with EF3.
For the next shot, try putting a reverse front porch on EF3 voltage
programming, starting at -0.015 s.

Jun 30 1993 09:49:35:810AM930630005Robert GranetzAdditional note for next shot: the reverse front porch (i.e. -50 volts)
on EF3 just prior to breakdown will give some current in EF3. This must
be compensated by about +100 amps in EF4. This will be programmed in
also for the next shot.

Jun 30 1993 09:57:19:480AM930630006Robert GranetzNo breakdown.

Jun 30 1993 10:01:18:230AM930630006Robert GranetzFor next shot, raise EF4 current by another 75 amps.

Jun 30 1993 10:14:07:170AM930630007Robert GranetzFizzle.

Jun 30 1993 10:20:55:620AM930630007Robert GranetzFor next shot, back off on EF4 by 35 amps.

Jun 30 1993 10:40:45:110AM930630008Robert GranetzBeauty! Ipmax=0.30 MA, duration=0.38 s. Sawtoothing for most of shot.

Jun 30 1993 10:45:05:540AM930630008Robert GranetzThe plasma current flattopped from 0.1 to 0.3 s, just as programmed.
However, the value was 0.30 MA, rather than the 0.25 MA that was programmed.
Examination of the hybrid feedback scopes showed that everything worked
as expected. Either the gain is not enough, or the RCUR feedback is
fighting the OH1 IP feedback. For the next shot, double the proportional
gain to 1.0 on the IP feedback.

Jun 30 1993 10:45:56:960AM930630008Robert GranetzAdditional note: the prefill pressure has been 4.0e-5 torr today.

Jun 30 1993 11:00:51:210AM930630009Robert GranetzFizzle. Everything appeared to be okay. The gas prefill pressure was not
reduced after the previous good shot...that's the only thing we can think
of. Try again with no changes.

Jun 30 1993 11:24:26:510AM930630010Robert GranetzGood shot. Ipmax=0.29 MA, duration=0.38 s. Feedback control of Ip still
doesn't seem to be trying hard enough to keep the current at 0.25 MA.

Jun 30 1993 11:27:23:220AM930630010Robert GranetzAfter looking at the hybrid traces, we think the problem is due to
conflicting demands with the RCUR feedback (especially the derivative
part of RCUR). We will change the IP and RCUR controller M values AFTER
the next shot. For the next shot, the only changes will be: reduce
the prefill pressure from 4.0 to 3.6e-5 (since this last shot was a good
one) and increase the pulse gas programming.

Jun 30 1993 11:47:30:620AM930630011Robert GranetzAnother good shot. This had the funny behavior at 0.2 s where radiated
power and x-rays take a jump, and the RF limiter probe drops.
The plasma current droops starting at 0.2 s, probably not due to feedback
control. Ipmax=0.27 MA, duration=0.34 s. Sawteeth start at 0.134 s.

Jun 30 1993 12:17:23:440PM930630011Robert GranetzFor the next shot, we are going to make a big change: input a new set of
M matrix values for the RCUR feedback, and develop a completely new controller
for IP which uses OH1, OH2's, and EF3's. We calculated the M values using
Steve Wolfe's IDL routine "controllers.pro". They should be more diagonal
than just using OH1 for IP feedback.

Jun 30 1993 12:18:15:010PM930630011Robert GranetzNote: while putting in the new controllers, there were a few that were
limited by the max permissibles in the hybrid.

Jun 30 1993 12:07:51:960PM930630012Robert GranetzRunaway shot. Intense hard x-rays.

Jun 30 1993 12:11:29:830PM930630012Robert GranetzThis shot was in trouble from the beginning. Bz has been creeping up a
tiny bit. For the next shot, drop EF4 by another 40 amps. Also, reload
the old RCUR M matrix values (since the old and new sets were about the
same except for a constant of proportionality). Also turn on argon
puffing.

Jun 30 1993 12:25:48:510PM930630012Robert GranetzAlso for the next shot: raise the prefill from 3.6 to 4.5e-5 torr, because
of the expected molydenum gettering that usually follows a runaway shot.

Jun 30 1993 12:20:48:910PM930630013Robert GranetzGot a shot back, but it started disrupting at 0.20 s. It was sawtoothing
until the first disruption. The radiated power was higher than normal,
perhaps because the previous runaway shot splatted molybdenum all over.

Jun 30 1993 12:27:45:610PM930630013Robert GranetzFor the next shot, the only change will be to reduce the prefill to
4.0e-5 torr.

Jun 30 1993 12:35:10:300PM930630014Robert GranetzVery similar to the previous shot. The first disruption happens slightly
later... at t=0.22 s.

Jun 30 1993 12:54:52:230PM930630014Robert GranetzWe can't figure out the hybrid feedback signals. The error outs appear to
be correct, but the final M out for the OH1 voltage doesn't seem to be
properly summed up. In fact, the M out OH1 voltage didn't change between
shot 004 (which didn't have feedback enabled) and shots 010 or 014 (which
had IP feedback enabled, with two different controllers).

For the next shot, try demanding 0.35 MA for Ip. Since the plasma current
has been naturally reaching 0.30 MA, this new demand should change the
error from -50 kA to +50 kA, resulting in an obvious change in the
M out OH1 voltage.

Jun 30 1993 12:55:43:350PM930630015Robert GranetzFizzle.

Jun 30 1993 01:15:06:650PM930630016Robert GranetzGot a little more plasma current this time. Ipmax=0.32 MA, duration=0.30 s.
There were disruptions starting at 0.22 s.

Jun 30 1993 01:16:25:430PM930630016Robert GranetzThe hybrid reacted properly to the different IP programming. For the
next shot, increase the PID proportional gain on IP to 2.5. Also decrease
the prefill pressure from 4.0 to 3.7e-5 torr.

Jun 30 1993 01:20:46:740PM930630017Robert GranetzFizzle

Jun 30 1993 01:29:42:690PM930630017Robert GranetzVertical field was -5 mT at breakdown, which is marginal. For the next
shot, increase EF4 by 25 amps (about +2 mT), and increase prefill to
4.0e-5 (since this shot was a fizzle).

Jun 30 1993 01:48:16:250PM930630018Robert GranetzGood shot. Ipmax=0.35 MA, which is exactly what we programmed. There is
a disruption at 0.22 s, which is where OH1 runs out of current. The
plasma current also starts to rampdown at 0.22 s. Radiated power, Zeff,
and x-ray signals are all about twice there normal levels. Other signals
are near normal. No hard x-rays.

Jun 30 1993 02:01:19:520PM930630019Robert GranetzGood one! Ipmax=0.387 MA. A new record. Duration=0.29 s. Ip starts to
ramp down at 0.18 s, which is exactly when OH1 runs out of current. The
centroid position is not well controlled after 0.2 seconds, probably due
to the supplies running out of poop. Radiated power, Zeff, and x-rays are
all very high.

Jun 30 1993 02:10:36:170PM930630019Robert GranetzFor the next shot, we wanted to move the PID turn-on and the programmed
turn-on earlier (from 0.100 to 0.080 s.) However, we forgot to change
the PID, and only changed the S demand waveform. Therefore, the next shot
should be a repeat of this one.

Jun 30 1993 02:20:03:300PM930630020Robert GranetzGood shot again. As expected, it was nearly identical to the preceding
shot. The discharge ended a little earlier this time, duration=0.267 s.
Ipmax=0.387 again. As before, the radiated power, Zeff, and x-ray
signals are very high. This may be due to the argon puffing.

Jun 30 1993 02:20:56:250PM930630020Robert GranetzFor the next shot, move the PID earlier, from 0.100 to 0.080 s. Also
decrease the pulse gas programming for the argon puff.

Jun 30 1993 02:37:11:480PM930630021Robert GranetzNot so great. Ipmax=0.35 MA, duration=0.215 s. The position starts to
get bad starting at 0.080 s, which is where the IP feedback turns on.
The OH2's are pushed to zero hard by the turn on of IP feedback on OH1.

Jun 30 1993 02:39:42:400PM930630021Robert GranetzFor the next shot, the only change will be to delay turn-on of IP feedback
from 0.080 to 0.126 s. The PID value is still 2.5 for the proportional
component.

Jun 30 1993 02:50:03:520PM930630022Robert GranetzGood shot. Ipmax=0.380 MA. Duration=0.345 s. X-ray emission saturated,
but not until after 0.2 s. Zeff was less on this shot.

Jun 30 1993 02:51:11:170PM930630022Robert GranetzNext shot: do a repeat for the ECE diagnostic. Amanda just fixed a problem
that's invalidated their data for all previous shots.

Jun 30 1993 03:17:25:980PM930630023Robert GranetzNot as nice a shot. It should have been a repeat of the preceding shot,
but it had a major disruption at 0.22 s. We'll blame it on the
Michelson.

Jun 30 1993 03:20:16:580PM930630023Robert GranetzBig changes for the next shot: change the IP controller in order to reduce
its use of the OH2's (so that they can be saved for ZCUR control).

The new controller has been calculated using OH1, OH2's, EF1's, and EF3's.

Due to hybrid limits, the new M values had to all be reduced by 1.5, so the
PID gain was also increased from 2.5 to 4.0. Here goes nothing...

Jun 30 1993 03:30:53:000PM930630024Robert GranetzNice shot, but we still didn't make 0.400 MA. Ipmax=0.37 MA, duration=0.34 s.
Position is still going bad, this time at 0.15 s.

Jun 30 1993 03:31:42:710PM930630024Robert GranetzFor the next shot, change IP feedback turn-on back to 0.100 s.

Jun 30 1993 03:43:29:980PM930630025Robert GranetzGood shot. Ipmax=0.37 MA, duration=0.347 s. Similar to previous shots.
The position control goes to hell starting at 0.12 s.

Jun 30 1993 03:44:38:440PM930630025Robert GranetzFor the next shot, back off on the Ip demand from 0.400 to 0.340 MA. We
want to see if the controller really works, and if we get a flattop.

Jun 30 1993 04:02:29:530PM930630026Robert GranetzWell we got Ipmax=0.31 MA, rather than 0.34 MA. And it flattopped.
There was a major disruption at 0.225 s. Position control was a little
better that time, maybe because the lower Ip demand left more current in
the OH1 and OH2's.

Jun 30 1993 04:03:12:330PM930630026Robert GranetzFor the next shot, just increase the proportional gain on the Ip feedback
from 4.0 to 10.0.

Jun 30 1993 04:14:04:850PM930630027Robert GranetzGood shot. Ipmax=0.36 MA, which is higher than we wanted. Position
control is also not too good.

Jun 30 1993 04:15:37:240PM930630027Robert GranetzBig change for the next shot: use new controller that does not use the
OH2's, only the OH1, EF1's, and EF3's. This is because the EF1's still
have some current available. Also, the pulsed gas was increased a little.

Jun 30 1993 04:31:40:830PM930630028Robert GranetzThis was a disruptive shot...perhaps due to the increased pulse gas
programming. Try repeating the shot with the gas programming copied in
from several shots ago (from 026).

Jun 30 1993 04:41:51:750PM930630028Robert GranetzAlso for the next shot: turn off argon puffing.

Jun 30 1993 04:40:26:760PM930630029Robert GranetzBeauty. Ipmax=0.33 MA, not quite flattopped though. EF1's had plenty of
current left over. Centroid control was excellent. Radiated power, Zeff,
and x-rays are all quite low. No disruptions until 0.335 s. Duration=0.38 s.

Jun 30 1993 04:41:18:630PM930630029Robert GranetzFor the next shot, change the S-waveform demand for Ip from 0.34 MA to 0.40 MA.

Jun 30 1993 04:42:12:580PM930630029Robert GranetzNote: there was no argon puff on this shot.

Jun 30 1993 04:53:22:610PM930630030Robert GranetzAnother good shot. Ipmax=0.35 MA, with no flattop. The demand was for
0.40 MA. Centroid control was not bad. Radiated power, Zeff, and x-rays
were low again, thanks to no argon puffing.

Jun 30 1993 04:55:13:900PM930630030Robert GranetzFor the next (and final) shot of the run: Raise Ip demand to 0.45 MA,
and turn on PID earlier (from 0.100 to 0.076 s), and raise PLC current
limit on EF3 to 18 kA.

Jun 30 1993 05:06:13:440PM930630031Robert GranetzGood shot, but Ipmax=0.37 MA only. Duration=0.377 s. The supplies tried to
get the current, but they ran out of current too soon. Radiated power,
Zeff, and x-rays are all low again.

Physics Operator Comments

Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
108:30:16:820AMTestOkEF3 test looks good
208:43:22:070AMTestOkEF3 test plc control; fast 10 khz digitizer
308:52:48:830AMTestBadEF3 did not fire; not the forced invert problem as yesterday
409:14:39:580AMPlasmaOkFirst Plasma OK
509:35:17:970AMPlasmaOkFizzle. setting up OH1 for plasma current feedback
609:53:51:600AMPlasmaBadNo flash. EF3 supply misbehaving but did not cause fizzle;
710:12:35:970AMPlasmaOkFizzle. Using EF4 to compensate for EF3 bias. EF3 B supply still glitc
810:26:49:260AMPlasmaOkExcellent shot with plasma current very flat at 300 kA for 200 msec
910:44:11:390AMPlasmaOkFizzle.
1011:00:00:800AMPlasmaOkgood shot
1111:27:32:020AMPlasmaOkAll OK
1211:50:41:420AMPlasmaOkNasty runaway shot
1312:11:40:590PMPlasmaOksilva's back
1412:27:59:080PMPlasmaOkshot ok
1512:53:15:120PMPlasmaOkthis ones for john
1601:04:59:480PMPlasmaOkgood shot
1701:17:11:690PMPlasmaOkfizzle
1801:31:19:780PMPlasmaOkgood shot; 350 kA with 100 msec flat-top; minor disruption at 220 msec
1901:49:37:630PMPlasmaOk0.38 MA plasma current; new record
2002:09:07:820PMPlasmaOksame as last shot; 385 kA
2102:23:42:050PMPlasmaOk330 kA disruption at 211 msec
2202:40:19:780PMPlasmaOkgood plasma but no flat-top
2302:53:12:630PMPlasmaOkgood plasma ; 150 kA/msec disruption from 300 ka
2403:20:11:460PMPlasmaOkNew Ip controller but no flat top; OH2s running out of current
2503:33:58:250PMPlasmaOkno flat top
2603:46:43:380PMPlasmaOkno flat top; disruption at .23 sec
2704:01:51:370PMPlasmaOkMax PID gain but marginal Ip flat-top
2804:14:58:330PMPlasmaOkVery disruptive shot
2904:32:45:760PMPlasmaOkvery nice shot, 325 +/1- 6 ka for over 100 msec
3004:44:53:450PMPlasmaOkTried for 400 kA; got 350
3104:57:26:050PMPlasmaOknice shot but no 400 kA