| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Steve Golovato |
| Physics operator(s): | Earl Marmar |
| Engineering operator(s): | Joe Daigle |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| plasma run |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:08:040PM |
| Author: To Be Determined |
| Run Summary - July 1, 1993 run (930701) Session leader - Golovato Assistant leader - Marmar Engineering leader - Daigle The goals of the run were: (1) Run in helium (pre-fill and puff) and make "good" plasmas. (2) Move plasma out to be closer to antenna, Use helium if running well, otherwise revert to hydrogen. (3) Elongate and move plasma down to better match antenna shape. (4) If everything is working, move the antenna in and observe antenna probe and network analyzer outputs. The run turned out to involve mainly breakdown studies, first in helium and then in hydrogen. We did accomplish goal (3) and had a record current shot (#24) of 430ka (non-thermal but not a complete runaway shot). By the end of the run, we seemed to have found good running conditions, for shots 31 and 32. Helium ECDC for 1.75 hours preceeded the run. The first 13 shots were in helium, the rest in hydrogen. The shot statsitics were: Breakdown but no current buildup (fizzles)- 14 (12 in helium) No breakdown (duds) - 2 (1 hardware, 1 too low gas) Plasmas - 16 (all in hydrogen) HELIUM OPERATION - We started with the hybrid setup for shot 930630019, which included the new EF3 programming to improve its turnon consistency. The fill gas was at 4.e-5 gauge, which is equivalent to 1.e-4 in hydrogen or 2.e-4 in nitrogen. The first few shots were spent adjusting EF4 to get the right Bz at breakdown. We always got a flash but no buildup. EF3 was crossing -300a at 3ms (this is Wolfe's criteria for EF3) for the same settings at which it crossed at 2ms the previous day. By shot 5 Bz looked good. We did a gas scan from 4.e-5 to 1.e-5, where we lost the flash. The breakdowns were late, around 7-8ms compared to 3-4ms the previous day, but helium broke down readily and the magnetic configuration at breakdown appeared correct for current buildup. EF3 was solid at -300a at 3ms. The main observable difference compared to hydrogen was in the radiated power. Typically the radiated power was 2-3 times higher than at the same time in a good hydrogen shot or even a hydrogen fizzle. Hydrogen fizzles are usually caused by too much gas or bad magnetics, neither of which appeared to be the case for these helium shots. We never even achieved the "proto-plasma" state in helium, only getting about 20ka. Several directions could be pursued to get current buildup in helium: (1) Use higher voltage breakdown, such as was used for the 930625 run where Vloop was a few volts higher at breakdown than the 930630 run. (2) Change the commutation resistors to get more Vloop. This will likely necessitate adjustments of timing to get the null right. (3) Try to get breakdown earlier, more like on 930630 and later this run in hydrogen. HYDROGEN OPERATION - We switched to hydrogen, both to make sure we could make plasma with this configuration and to accomplish some of the other run goals. The first hydrogen shot was good (#14). Thereafter, we had many disruptive shots, typically with low current and high Zeff. Goal (2) was discarded since the plasmas were already roughly full size radially (a=20cm). Shots continued to be dirty with low current mixed, in with some non-thermal shots (not full runaway shots) with record currents (430ka and 400ka). Conditions were not very reproducible. Things improved on the last four shots by moving the entire EF3 voltage programming 1ms earlier and adjusting EF4 up a 25a. Now EF3 crossed -300a at <2ms and breakdowns occured around 3-4ms. However EF3 was no longer consistant, it was very early on shot 30, which fizzled. During the series of hydrogen shots, the plasma was moved down 2cm over the span of 125-200ms by programming zcur to move down 3cm. It stayed at -2cm until OH2 runs out at about 260ms. On the last shot, the elongation of 1.4 at 200ms was prolonged to 260ms by keeping EF1 current up longer. This produced a plasma well-fitted to the antenna shape from about 190-260ms, as evidenced by roughly equal signals on the top, middle, and bottom limiter probes, achieving goal (3) as time ran out. In the end, it would have been nice to try helium with an earlier breakdown time, as was achieved in hydrogen at the end of the run. It might work. The other key may be the higher radiated power in helium, we may need more power early to burn through. It is not clear whether the many high Zeff, low current shots were related to the helium discharge cleaning and helium operation, or the late breakdown. Some shots got stuck at about 20ka for a while before taking off, looking similar to the helium shots (see shots 16 and 27). I think we could achieve helium operation with another day of trying. Matching the plasma to the antenna shape seems straightforward. We also pushed the density up with gas puffing, getting above 6.e19 during the matched phase (190-260ms) on shot 32. The higher edge density during the "shark fin" on shot 32 is also advantageous for coupling, though Zeff also goes up during the shark fin. There were no engineering problems. One shot was lost because OH1 did not commutate, but no problem was found and the subsequent shots worked fine. It is advantageous to run the LN2 pump at 34 Hz to avoid cryo holding up the shot cycle. No leaks were opened with this rate of cooling. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Jul 1 1993 09:09:22:430AM | Earl Marmar | Today's run: RF coupling studies in helium.
Specific goals: 1) Run in helium and make "good" plasmas. 2) Move plasma out to be close to antenna. Use He if running well, otherwise revert to hydrogen. 3) Elongate and move down a little to better match the antenna shape. 4) If everything is working, move the RF antenna in a little. | |
| Jul 1 1993 09:14:19:450AM | 930701001 | Earl Marmar | Today's run: RF coupling studies in helium.
Starting from shot 930630019, but with Ip feedback turned off and EF4 turn-on earlier; gas puff also tweaked and moved earlier (starts at -12 msec). Pfill (gauge) = 4.0e-5 Result: Fizzle; Got slightly +ve vertical field at commutation. EF4 was a bit high and EF3 was a bit late. |
| Jul 1 1993 09:39:16:980AM | 930701002 | Earl Marmar | Lower fill pressure to 3.0e-5 and try again.
Result: Fizzle. Same problem with vertical field. |
| Jul 1 1993 09:48:32:950AM | 930701003 | Earl Marmar | Lower fill pressure to 2.5e-5
Lowered EF4 from 725 to 702 A. Result: Fizzle. Bz better but still slightly +ve. |
| Jul 1 1993 10:01:27:360AM | 930701003 | Earl Marmar | Lowered EF4 from 702 to 653 A.
Result: Fizzle. Bz looks good. |
| Jul 1 1993 10:15:56:250AM | 930701005 | Earl Marmar | Lowered fill pressure to 2.0e-5
Result: Fizzle. Bz still looks OK. Slightly more Prad at breakdown. |
| Jul 1 1993 10:32:17:270AM | 930701006 | Earl Marmar | Lowered fill pressure to 1.5e-5
Result: Fizzle. |
| Jul 1 1993 10:49:05:200AM | 930701007 | Earl Marmar | Lowered fill pressure to 1.2e-5
Result: Fizzle |
| Jul 1 1993 10:55:59:980AM | 930701008 | Earl Marmar | Lowered fill pressure to 1.0e-5
Result: Dud |
| Jul 1 1993 11:10:53:770AM | 930701008 | Earl Marmar | Lowered fill pressure to 1.0e-5
Result: Dud |
| Jul 1 1993 11:11:23:420AM | 930701009 | Earl Marmar | Lowered fill pressure to 1.8e-5
Result: Fizzle |
| Jul 1 1993 11:37:50:160AM | 930701010 | Earl Marmar | Fill pressure to 2.2e-5
Result: Fizzle |
| Jul 1 1993 11:39:33:390AM | 930701011 | Earl Marmar | Fill pressure to 4.0e-5
Result: Fizzle |
| Jul 1 1993 11:58:07:840AM | 930701012 | Earl Marmar | Fill pressure to 2.0e-5
EF3 voltage reduced from -1300 to -1200 V Result: Fizzle |
| Jul 1 1993 12:09:18:960PM | 930701013 | Earl Marmar | Fill pressure 2.0e-5
EF3 voltage reduced from -1200 to -1100 V Result: Fizzle |
| Jul 1 1993 12:45:14:880PM | 930701014 | Earl Marmar | Switching back to hydrogen fill and pulse
EF3 back to -1300V Pulse gas program from shot 930630019 Fill pressure 4.5e-5 Result: Good shot. 350 kA. nel4=3.4e19 |
| Jul 1 1993 01:05:56:840PM | 930701015 | Earl Marmar | Changed Rcur to move plasma out 1 cm between 150 and 200 msec
Result: OK. quite disruptive |
| Jul 1 1993 01:14:04:730PM | 930701016 | Earl Marmar | Fill pressure to 4.0e-5
Result: 170 kA, died at 180 ms. |
| Jul 1 1993 01:31:50:750PM | 930701017 | Earl Marmar | Removed Rcur change.
Changed Zcur to -1.5 between 150 and 200 ms. Result: 250 kA. Plasma did respond to Zcur change; disruption at 230 ms |
| Jul 1 1993 01:47:28:900PM | 930701018 | Earl Marmar | Fill pressure = 3.7e-4 (this was also true for shot 17)
Changed Zcur to -2.5 between 125 and 200 ms. Using gas puff from 930625025 with lower middle puff. Result: Good shot. 280 kA. First diruption at 330 ms. Zcur responded, got about -1.5 cm on soft X-rays. |
| Jul 1 1993 02:04:54:720PM | 930701019 | Earl Marmar | Changed Zcur to -3 cm between 125 and 200 ms.
Middle gas puff a little earlier and a bit bigger. EF3 to -1200 from -1300 V. Result: 180 kA. Disrupt at 188. |
| Jul 1 1993 02:13:25:270PM | 930701020 | Earl Marmar | Decreased initial gas puff, middle gas puff earlier.
Result: Good shot. 280 kA, first disrupt at 337 ms. nel4=4e19, Zeff=2. |
| Jul 1 1993 02:18:39:630PM | 930701020 | Earl Marmar | Decreased initial gas puff, middle gas puff earlier.
Result: Good shot. 280 kA, first disrupt at 337 ms. nel4=4e19, Zeff=2. |
| Jul 1 1993 02:32:02:510PM | 930701021 | Earl Marmar | Tweaks on gas puff
Result: Dud. No commutation on OH1. |
| Jul 1 1993 02:42:52:700PM | 930701022 | Earl Marmar | Try again
Result: 150 kA, disrupt at 96 ms, possibly too much early gas puff. |
| Jul 1 1993 03:02:47:040PM | 930701023 | Earl Marmar | Reduce first gas puff.
Result: Slightly better. 200 kA, first disrupt at 105 kA |
| Jul 1 1993 03:16:51:470PM | 930701024 | Earl Marmar | Delayed EF3 by 1 msec
Result: Very disruptive. Non-thermal. Hard Xray = 25 Volts. New current record Ip=430 kA. |
| Jul 1 1993 03:45:13:060PM | 930701026 | Earl Marmar | Move EF3 earlier by 1 msec (back to where it was for shots 23 and earlier).
EF3 demand reduced to -1060 from -1200 V. Result: Non-thermal. 400 kA, lots of hards, bright spot on limiter at end of shot, no obvious gettering of water. |
| Jul 1 1993 03:58:02:170PM | 930701027 | Earl Marmar | Increased EF3 demand to -1150 V.
Fill pressure = 4.0e-5 Result: 150 kA, disruptive |
| Jul 1 1993 04:05:04:000PM | 930701028 | Earl Marmar | loaded EF3 voltage and EF4 current from 930630019
Result: fizzle. Bz possibly a little to close to 0. |
| Jul 1 1993 04:23:09:070PM | 930701029 | Earl Marmar | moved EF3 voltage programming earlier by 1 msec
result: good shot. 330 kA. Disruptive after 185 ms. Z_eff ~ 1.3 |
| Jul 1 1993 04:34:41:020PM | 930701030 | Earl Marmar | lowered fill pressure to 3.7e-5
lowered second gas puff Result: fizzle. EF3 came on about .5 msec earlier, breakdown was later and there was too much Bz. |
| Jul 1 1993 04:55:17:100PM | 930701031 | Earl Marmar | Raised EF4 from 725 to 750 Amps
Result: good shot. 310 kA. Sawtoothing. First disruption at 340 ms. nel4=4.8e19. Z_eff ~ 1.2 |
| Jul 1 1993 06:11:40:540PM | 930701032 | Earl Marmar | Changed EF1 to maintain elongation later in the shot.
Result: decent shot. 280 kA. Sawtoothing. Disrupts at 280 ms. kappa stayed up at ~1.4 until 250 ms. nel4=6.7e19, with shark fin. Z_eff ~ 1.2 before shark fin. |
| Physics Operator Comments |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 08:56:07:310AM | Plasma | Ok | Plasma shot no faults. |
| 2 | 09:29:26:170AM | Plasma | Ok | Plasma shot No faults |
| 3 | 09:41:11:190AM | Plasma | Ok | Plasma shot No faults |
| 4 | 09:55:35:040AM | Plasma | Ok | Plasma shot no faults. |
| 5 | 10:08:51:420AM | Plasma | Ok | Plasma shot no faults |
| 6 | 10:25:04:570AM | Plasma | Ok | Plasma shot no faults. |
| 7 | 10:40:09:180AM | Plasma | Ok | Plasma shot no faults |
| 8 | 10:53:27:930AM | Plasma | Ok | Plasma shot no faults. |
| 9 | 11:08:24:370AM | Plasma | Ok | Plasma shot no faults. |
| 10 | 11:23:22:210AM | Plasma | Ok | plasma shot no faults |
| 11 | 11:35:17:160AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 12 | 11:50:44:190AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 13 | 12:04:41:550PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 14 | 12:23:51:770PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 15 | 12:46:30:510PM | Plasma | Ok | Plasma shot No faults. |
| 16 | 01:00:34:260PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 17 | 01:17:31:640PM | Plasma | Ok | plasma shot no faults |
| 18 | 01:35:50:740PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 19 | 01:50:42:440PM | Plasma | Ok | plasma shot no faults |
| 20 | 02:03:18:870PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 21 | 02:20:04:720PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults -- oh1 didn't comm. |
| 22 | 02:34:34:160PM | Plasma | Ok | plasma shot no faults |
| 23 | 02:46:51:610PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 24 | 03:00:19:160PM | Plasma | Ok | plasma shot 430ka No faults. |
| 25 | 03:16:47:230PM | Plasma | Ok | Plasma shot No faults. |
| 26 | 03:27:31:220PM | Plasma | Ok | plasma shot 400KA No faults. |
| 27 | 03:47:50:110PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 28 | 03:59:44:100PM | Plasma | Ok | plasma shot no faults |
| 29 | 04:13:02:240PM | Plasma | Ok | plasma shot no faults |
| 30 | 04:27:38:680PM | Plasma | Ok | Plasma shot no faults. |
| 31 | 04:39:40:730PM | Plasma | Ok | plasma shot no faults |
| 32 | 04:56:56:730PM | Plasma | Ok | plasma shot no faults |