Alcator C-Mod Run 930701 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:
Date Filed:
Title:
First Author:
Session Leader:Steve Golovato (shots 1-32)

Operators
Session leader(s):Steve Golovato
Physics operator(s):Earl Marmar
Engineering operator(s):Joe Daigle

Engineering Operator Run Comment
plasma run

Session Leader Plans

Physics Operators Plans

Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:08:040PM
Author: To Be Determined
Run Summary - July 1, 1993 run (930701)

Session leader - Golovato
Assistant leader - Marmar
Engineering leader - Daigle


The goals of the run were:

(1) Run in helium (pre-fill and puff) and make "good" plasmas.
(2) Move plasma out to be closer to antenna, Use helium if running well,
otherwise revert to hydrogen.
(3) Elongate and move plasma down to better match antenna shape.
(4) If everything is working, move the antenna in and observe antenna
probe and network analyzer outputs.

The run turned out to involve mainly breakdown studies, first in helium and
then in hydrogen. We did accomplish goal (3) and had a record current shot
(#24) of 430ka (non-thermal but not a complete runaway shot). By the end
of the run, we seemed to have found good running conditions, for shots 31
and 32. Helium ECDC for 1.75 hours preceeded the run. The first 13 shots
were in helium, the rest in hydrogen. The shot statsitics were:

Breakdown but no current buildup (fizzles)- 14 (12 in helium)
No breakdown (duds) - 2 (1 hardware, 1 too low gas)
Plasmas - 16 (all in hydrogen)

HELIUM OPERATION - We started with the hybrid setup for shot 930630019,
which included the new EF3 programming to improve its turnon consistency.
The fill gas was at 4.e-5 gauge, which is equivalent to 1.e-4 in hydrogen or
2.e-4 in nitrogen. The first few shots were spent adjusting EF4 to get
the right Bz at breakdown. We always got a flash but no buildup. EF3
was crossing -300a at 3ms (this is Wolfe's criteria for EF3) for the same
settings at which it crossed at 2ms the previous day. By shot 5 Bz looked
good. We did a gas scan from 4.e-5 to 1.e-5, where we lost the flash.
The breakdowns were late, around 7-8ms compared to 3-4ms the previous day,
but helium broke down readily and the magnetic configuration at breakdown
appeared correct for current buildup. EF3 was solid at -300a at 3ms.
The main observable difference compared to hydrogen was in the radiated power.
Typically the radiated power was 2-3 times higher than at the same time in a
good hydrogen shot or even a hydrogen fizzle. Hydrogen fizzles are usually
caused by too much gas or bad magnetics, neither of which appeared to be the
case for these helium shots. We never even achieved the "proto-plasma" state
in helium, only getting about 20ka. Several directions could be pursued to
get current buildup in helium:

(1) Use higher voltage breakdown, such as was used for the 930625 run
where Vloop was a few volts higher at breakdown than the 930630 run.
(2) Change the commutation resistors to get more Vloop. This will
likely necessitate adjustments of timing to get the null right.
(3) Try to get breakdown earlier, more like on 930630 and later this run
in hydrogen.

HYDROGEN OPERATION - We switched to hydrogen, both to make sure we could make
plasma with this configuration and to accomplish some of the other run goals.
The first hydrogen shot was good (#14). Thereafter, we had many disruptive
shots, typically with low current and high Zeff. Goal (2) was discarded
since the plasmas were already roughly full size radially (a=20cm).
Shots continued to be dirty with low current mixed, in with some non-thermal
shots (not full runaway shots) with record currents (430ka and 400ka).
Conditions were not very reproducible. Things improved on the last four
shots by moving the entire EF3 voltage programming 1ms earlier and adjusting
EF4 up a 25a. Now EF3 crossed -300a at <2ms and breakdowns occured around
3-4ms. However EF3 was no longer consistant, it was very early on shot 30,
which fizzled. During the series of hydrogen shots, the plasma was moved
down 2cm over the span of 125-200ms by programming zcur to move down 3cm.
It stayed at -2cm until OH2 runs out at about 260ms. On the last shot, the
elongation of 1.4 at 200ms was prolonged to 260ms by keeping EF1 current up
longer. This produced a plasma well-fitted to the antenna shape from about
190-260ms, as evidenced by roughly equal signals on the top, middle, and
bottom limiter probes, achieving goal (3) as time ran out.

In the end, it would have been nice to try helium with an earlier breakdown
time, as was achieved in hydrogen at the end of the run. It might work.
The other key may be the higher radiated power in helium, we may need more
power early to burn through. It is not clear whether the many high Zeff,
low current shots were related to the helium discharge cleaning and helium
operation, or the late breakdown. Some shots got stuck at about 20ka for a
while before taking off, looking similar to the helium shots (see shots 16
and 27). I think we could achieve helium operation with another day of trying.
Matching the plasma to the antenna shape seems straightforward. We also pushed
the density up with gas puffing, getting above 6.e19 during the matched phase
(190-260ms) on shot 32. The higher edge density during the "shark fin" on
shot 32 is also advantageous for coupling, though Zeff also goes up during the
shark fin.

There were no engineering problems. One shot was lost because OH1 did not
commutate, but no problem was found and the subsequent shots worked fine.
It is advantageous to run the LN2 pump at 34 Hz to avoid cryo holding
up the shot cycle. No leaks were opened with this rate of cooling.


Physics Operator Summaries

Session Leader Comments
Jul 1 1993 09:09:22:430AMEarl MarmarToday's run: RF coupling studies in helium.

Specific goals:

1) Run in helium and make "good" plasmas.

2) Move plasma out to be close to antenna. Use He if running well, otherwise revert to
hydrogen.

3) Elongate and move down a little to better match the antenna shape.

4) If everything is working, move the RF antenna in a little.

Jul 1 1993 09:14:19:450AM930701001Earl MarmarToday's run: RF coupling studies in helium.

Starting from shot 930630019, but with Ip feedback turned off and EF4 turn-on
earlier; gas puff also tweaked and moved earlier (starts at -12 msec).

Pfill (gauge) = 4.0e-5

Result: Fizzle; Got slightly +ve vertical field at commutation. EF4 was a bit high and
EF3 was a bit late.

Jul 1 1993 09:39:16:980AM930701002Earl MarmarLower fill pressure to 3.0e-5 and try again.

Result: Fizzle. Same problem with vertical field.

Jul 1 1993 09:48:32:950AM930701003Earl MarmarLower fill pressure to 2.5e-5
Lowered EF4 from 725 to 702 A.

Result: Fizzle. Bz better but still slightly +ve.

Jul 1 1993 10:01:27:360AM930701003Earl MarmarLowered EF4 from 702 to 653 A.

Result: Fizzle. Bz looks good.

Jul 1 1993 10:15:56:250AM930701005Earl MarmarLowered fill pressure to 2.0e-5

Result: Fizzle. Bz still looks OK. Slightly more Prad at breakdown.

Jul 1 1993 10:32:17:270AM930701006Earl MarmarLowered fill pressure to 1.5e-5

Result: Fizzle.

Jul 1 1993 10:49:05:200AM930701007Earl MarmarLowered fill pressure to 1.2e-5

Result: Fizzle

Jul 1 1993 10:55:59:980AM930701008Earl MarmarLowered fill pressure to 1.0e-5

Result: Dud

Jul 1 1993 11:10:53:770AM930701008Earl MarmarLowered fill pressure to 1.0e-5

Result: Dud

Jul 1 1993 11:11:23:420AM930701009Earl MarmarLowered fill pressure to 1.8e-5

Result: Fizzle

Jul 1 1993 11:37:50:160AM930701010Earl MarmarFill pressure to 2.2e-5

Result: Fizzle

Jul 1 1993 11:39:33:390AM930701011Earl MarmarFill pressure to 4.0e-5

Result: Fizzle

Jul 1 1993 11:58:07:840AM930701012Earl MarmarFill pressure to 2.0e-5
EF3 voltage reduced from -1300 to -1200 V

Result: Fizzle

Jul 1 1993 12:09:18:960PM930701013Earl MarmarFill pressure 2.0e-5
EF3 voltage reduced from -1200 to -1100 V

Result: Fizzle

Jul 1 1993 12:45:14:880PM930701014Earl MarmarSwitching back to hydrogen fill and pulse
EF3 back to -1300V
Pulse gas program from shot 930630019
Fill pressure 4.5e-5

Result: Good shot. 350 kA. nel4=3.4e19

Jul 1 1993 01:05:56:840PM930701015Earl MarmarChanged Rcur to move plasma out 1 cm between 150 and 200 msec

Result: OK. quite disruptive

Jul 1 1993 01:14:04:730PM930701016Earl MarmarFill pressure to 4.0e-5

Result: 170 kA, died at 180 ms.

Jul 1 1993 01:31:50:750PM930701017Earl MarmarRemoved Rcur change.
Changed Zcur to -1.5 between 150 and 200 ms.

Result: 250 kA. Plasma did respond to Zcur change; disruption at 230 ms

Jul 1 1993 01:47:28:900PM930701018Earl MarmarFill pressure = 3.7e-4 (this was also true for shot 17)
Changed Zcur to -2.5 between 125 and 200 ms.
Using gas puff from 930625025 with lower middle puff.

Result: Good shot. 280 kA. First diruption at 330 ms. Zcur responded, got about
-1.5 cm on soft X-rays.

Jul 1 1993 02:04:54:720PM930701019Earl MarmarChanged Zcur to -3 cm between 125 and 200 ms.
Middle gas puff a little earlier and a bit bigger.
EF3 to -1200 from -1300 V.

Result: 180 kA. Disrupt at 188.

Jul 1 1993 02:13:25:270PM930701020Earl MarmarDecreased initial gas puff, middle gas puff earlier.

Result: Good shot. 280 kA, first disrupt at 337 ms. nel4=4e19, Zeff=2.

Jul 1 1993 02:18:39:630PM930701020Earl MarmarDecreased initial gas puff, middle gas puff earlier.

Result: Good shot. 280 kA, first disrupt at 337 ms. nel4=4e19, Zeff=2.

Jul 1 1993 02:32:02:510PM930701021Earl MarmarTweaks on gas puff

Result: Dud. No commutation on OH1.

Jul 1 1993 02:42:52:700PM930701022Earl MarmarTry again

Result: 150 kA, disrupt at 96 ms, possibly too much early gas puff.

Jul 1 1993 03:02:47:040PM930701023Earl MarmarReduce first gas puff.

Result: Slightly better. 200 kA, first disrupt at 105 kA

Jul 1 1993 03:16:51:470PM930701024Earl MarmarDelayed EF3 by 1 msec

Result: Very disruptive. Non-thermal. Hard Xray = 25 Volts. New current record
Ip=430 kA.

Jul 1 1993 03:45:13:060PM930701026Earl MarmarMove EF3 earlier by 1 msec (back to where it was for shots 23 and earlier).
EF3 demand reduced to -1060 from -1200 V.

Result: Non-thermal. 400 kA, lots of hards, bright spot on limiter at end of shot,
no obvious gettering of water.

Jul 1 1993 03:58:02:170PM930701027Earl MarmarIncreased EF3 demand to -1150 V.
Fill pressure = 4.0e-5

Result: 150 kA, disruptive

Jul 1 1993 04:05:04:000PM930701028Earl Marmarloaded EF3 voltage and EF4 current from 930630019

Result: fizzle. Bz possibly a little to close to 0.

Jul 1 1993 04:23:09:070PM930701029Earl Marmarmoved EF3 voltage programming earlier by 1 msec

result: good shot. 330 kA. Disruptive after 185 ms. Z_eff ~ 1.3

Jul 1 1993 04:34:41:020PM930701030Earl Marmarlowered fill pressure to 3.7e-5
lowered second gas puff

Result: fizzle. EF3 came on about .5 msec earlier, breakdown was later and there
was too much Bz.

Jul 1 1993 04:55:17:100PM930701031Earl MarmarRaised EF4 from 725 to 750 Amps

Result: good shot. 310 kA. Sawtoothing. First disruption at 340 ms. nel4=4.8e19.
Z_eff ~ 1.2

Jul 1 1993 06:11:40:540PM930701032Earl MarmarChanged EF1 to maintain elongation later in the shot.

Result: decent shot. 280 kA. Sawtoothing. Disrupts at 280 ms.
kappa stayed up at ~1.4 until 250 ms.
nel4=6.7e19, with shark fin.
Z_eff ~ 1.2 before shark fin.

Physics Operator Comments

Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
108:56:07:310AMPlasmaOkPlasma shot no faults.
209:29:26:170AMPlasmaOkPlasma shot No faults
309:41:11:190AMPlasmaOkPlasma shot No faults
409:55:35:040AMPlasmaOkPlasma shot no faults.
510:08:51:420AMPlasmaOkPlasma shot no faults
610:25:04:570AMPlasmaOkPlasma shot no faults.
710:40:09:180AMPlasmaOkPlasma shot no faults
810:53:27:930AMPlasmaOkPlasma shot no faults.
911:08:24:370AMPlasmaOkPlasma shot no faults.
1011:23:22:210AMPlasmaOkplasma shot no faults
1111:35:17:160AMPlasmaOkno faults
1211:50:44:190AMPlasmaOkno faults
1312:04:41:550PMPlasmaOkno faults
1412:23:51:770PMPlasmaOkno faults
1512:46:30:510PMPlasmaOkPlasma shot No faults.
1601:00:34:260PMPlasmaOkno faults
1701:17:31:640PMPlasmaOkplasma shot no faults
1801:35:50:740PMPlasmaOkno faults
1901:50:42:440PMPlasmaOkplasma shot no faults
2002:03:18:870PMPlasmaOkno faults
2102:20:04:720PMPlasmaOkno faults -- oh1 didn't comm.
2202:34:34:160PMPlasmaOkplasma shot no faults
2302:46:51:610PMPlasmaOkno faults
2403:00:19:160PMPlasmaOkplasma shot 430ka No faults.
2503:16:47:230PMPlasmaOkPlasma shot No faults.
2603:27:31:220PMPlasmaOkplasma shot 400KA No faults.
2703:47:50:110PMPlasmaOkno faults
2803:59:44:100PMPlasmaOkplasma shot no faults
2904:13:02:240PMPlasmaOkplasma shot no faults
3004:27:38:680PMPlasmaOkPlasma shot no faults.
3104:39:40:730PMPlasmaOkplasma shot no faults
3204:56:56:730PMPlasmaOkplasma shot no faults