Alcator C-Mod Run 930924 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:
Date Filed:
Title:
First Author:
Session Leader:John Goetz (shots 1-31)

Operators
Session leader(s):John Goetz
Physics operator(s):Ian Hutchinson
Engineering operator(s):Vinny Bertolino

Engineering Operator Run Comment
RF conditioning --D2

Session Leader Plans

Physics Operators Plans

Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:08:993PM
Author: To Be Determined
Physics operator and Session leader summary for 930924

EO: Bertolino
PO: Hutchinson
SL: Goetz

The goal of Run 930924 was to obtain reliable breakdowns with deuterium fill
and fueling gas. The plan for the day was to once again explore breakdown
space, i.e., obtain a good field null, determine the correct fill pressure
and fueling pulse, and get an acceptable current rise.

The run started with a reload of shot 930923018 which had fueling programming
acceptable for a hydrogen plasma. The first shot was a test shot to determine
the difference in fueling time for a deuterium pulse. The deuterium pulse
takes from 5 - 10 msec longer than hydrogen to register at the gauge. The
first six shots were used to determine the correct time to start the fueling
pulse and the correct magnitude of the pulse. Shots with hard x-rays and
density disruptions occured but by shot 009 a good gas pulse was obtained.

The field nulls obtained throughout the day were good, if not very good.
The commutation resistors for the EF1's were increased to 100 mOhm and the
V_EF1's and V_OH2U were tweaked just after commutation to try and remove the
curvature from the vacuum fields. The radial field drifted somewhat during
the run and small tweaks to the Br_0 controller were needed, although never
more than 0.5 mT was needed. The ramp rate of the vertical field was adjusted
throughout the run using the OH1 and EF3 voltages. A linear ramp of Bz was
achieved by the end of the run and a current rise without a hesitation
followed.

Radial position control was achieved by moving the switch-on time of the
RCUR controller to .02 sec and turning up the PID and M gains. Vertical
position control was much better during this run. The chopper was removed
from ZCUR(2) and the gains for ZCUR(3) were increased. Also a new predictor
for ZCUR(3) was calculated using FILAMENT/nocoils.

The plasmas produced throughout the run were rather dirty with copious amounts
of molybdenum. Many of the fizzles had acceptable field structure and had
'burn-out' on the z-meter diagnostic. Disruptions also plagued the run and
an upcoming run may shed some light on to the post-disruption fizzle blues
puzzle. As usual it is difficult to determine if fields, fill, or some other
condition is limiting the operational space for a good breakdown.

Engineering troubles today: Feedback on the plasma current causes trouble
with the OH1 and EF4 power supplies during fizzles. The dead-time has been
adjusted to save these supplies from shoot-through. This adjustment causes
a longer dead-time which leads to a dimple in the plasma current (until OH1
has current again).

Scorecard: 30 shots = 16 plasmas + 13 fizzles + 1 test

Shot summary for 930924
Reload of 930923018

Changes:
PULSE_GAS_3 waveform doing all the fueling
put CLEAR_IN on Wire 6


1 test shot for deuterium fuel delay test
2 P_0=1.2e-5 move PULSE_GAS_3 5 msec earlier fizzle
3 move PULSE_GAS_3 3 msec later fizzle
4 move PULSE_GAS_3 3 msec later plasma
5 lower PULSE_GAS_3 starting at 40 msec plasma
6 raise gas @ 0; lower after .1 chopper removed from wire 2
M gain of chopper on wire 3 doubled to comp. plasma
7 move PULSE_GAS_3 2 msec earlier; lower V_OH2U to 25V @ .001
and .003 (was 35); chopper D now 6 plasma
8 V_OH2U -25V@.4 & -30@.7 (help EFC bias) lower gas @.25 on plasma
9 lower early fueling gas raise EF1 comm. resistance to .1 Ohm plasma
10 V_EF3 to -2800 @ -.001 D_RCUR to 2 fizzle
11 V_EF3 back to -3000 V_OH1 to -180V @ .005 D_ZCUR(3)=4 plasma
12 turn on RCUR @ .02 turn off D_ZCUR(3) from.7 to .8
increase fueling from .3 to .6 plasma
13 P_RCUR=4 D_RCUR=4 dropout on ZCUR(2) and ZCUR(3) from .75 to .76
raise fuel @ .2 and lower after .5 plasma
14 P_RCUR=6 D_RCUR=6 raise fuel after .5 fizzle
15 V_OH1 to -185V @ .005 IC_EF4 @ -1000 @ .35 fizzle
16 P_0 = 1.1e-5 fizzle
17 P_0=1.2e-5 V_EF3 to -2900 @ -.001 fizzle
18 V_EF3 to -2800 @ -.001 offset on Br_0 now .0095 fizzle
19 delay PULSE_GAS_3 by .002 V_EF1's to -150V @ .002 fizzle
20 V_OH1 to -150V @ .024 plasma
21 lower fuel after .5 fizzle
22 V_OH1 -175 @ .005 & -160 @ .024 offset on Br_0 = +.009 plasma
23 M_RCUR gains all inc. by 1/3 remove EFC_current from
predictor on wire 3 plasma
24 gas to 35V @ .07 & .11 recalculate Wire 3 - filament/nocoils plasma
25 PULSE_GAS_2 50V from .4 to .425 remove 300A from EF1U and
add 250A to EF2U after .2 plasma
26 PULSE_GAS_2 = 60V more PULSE_GAS_3 @ .2 D_ZCUR(3)=9. fizzle
27 offset on Br_0 = .0085 plasma
28 100V spike on PULSE_GAS_2 V_OH1 -165 @ .005 & -170 @ .024
raise M_ZCUR(2) 8x lower P_ZCUR to 2 fizzle
29 no RF fizzle
30 P_0=1.0e-5 V_OH1 -170 @ .005 plasma

Physics Operator Summaries

Session Leader Comments
Sep 24 1993 08:30:53:930AMJohn GoetzRun 930924

Today's run is dedicated to obtaining reliable breakdown using
deuterium fill and fueling gas.
Secondary goals include further evaluation of the R_XL and Z_XL
controllers, installation of CLEAR_IN and CLEAR_OUT predictors and
evaluation of their controllers, and tuning and conditioning of the
RF antenna in anticipation of Run 930928.

Sep 24 1993 09:01:12:960AM930924001John GoetzShot 001
Test shot to determine deuterium fueling delay time
(to be compared with Shot 930923014 - a dud)

For Shot 002:
Move gas programming 5 msec earlier and fire away

Sep 24 1993 09:20:22:310AM930924002John GoetzShot 002
Fizzle
Burn-out on z-meter trace
Density 1e19 (Nel) - usually 5e18

For Shot 003:
Move gas programming 3 msec later and try again

Sep 24 1993 09:37:31:970AM930924003John GoetzShot 003
Fizzle
Burn-out on z-meter trace
Density 1e19 (Nel) - usually 5e18

For Shot 004:
Move gas programming 3 msec later and try again

Sep 24 1993 09:54:00:930AM930924004John GoetzShot 004
Plasma
over-gasssed beginning at 40 msec
density disruptions the whole way - VDE @ .370

For Shot 005:
Lower gas programming starting at +.04 until .25

Sep 24 1993 10:17:41:420AM930924005John GoetzShot 005
Plasma
density disruptions the whole way - VDE @ .820
hards until .233

For Shot 006:
Raise gas programming at 0 until .05; lower from .1
Remove chopper from Wire 2; up the M on wire 3 to make the
change transparent
Enable RF

Sep 24 1993 10:31:55:460AM930924006John GoetzShot 006
Plasma - 47kA
VDE @ .820
still some hards early

For Shot 007:
Move gas programming 2 msec earlier
Up chopper D gain to 6.
lower V_OH2U to 25v @ .001 and .003 (was 35) try and smooth
out radial field after commutation
Enable RF

Sep 24 1993 10:49:18:970AM930924007John GoetzShot 007
Plasma - 440kA
VDE @ .690
hards gone due to gas programming
high density - shark fin @.33
oscillations gone from ZCUR
fields look much better at current rampup

For Shot 008:
lower gas programming from .25 sec on
lower V_OH2U to -25v @ .4 and -35V @ .7 (help with EFC bias)
Enable argon puff

Sep 24 1993 11:07:47:010AM930924008John GoetzShot 008
Plasma - 440kA
VDE @ .42
density 8e19 -nel- sudden drop @ .34

For Shot 009:
lower gas programming @.1 (to 25V)
raise EF1 commutation resistor to .1Ohm (slow down Bz ramp)

Sep 24 1993 11:32:02:680AM930924009John GoetzShot 009
Plasma - 470kA - no disruption - successful rampdown
dirty plasma
R oscillations early
45 kW RF

For Shot 010:
V_EF3 to -2800 @ -.001 (slow vertical field ramp)
D_RCUR to 2 (stop RCUR oscillations)

Sep 24 1993 11:50:17:920AM930924010John GoetzShot 010
Fizzle
Bz ramp rate too slow?

For Shot 011:
V_EF3 to -3000 @ -.001
V_OH1 to -180V @ .005 (was -200) (faster Bz ramp rate)
D_ZCUR(3) to 4.

Sep 24 1993 12:07:52:380PM930924011John GoetzShot 011
Plasma
good current rise
natural injection @ .6

For Shot 012:
D_ZCUR(3) off from .7 to .8
turn on RCUR @ .02
up gas from .3 to .6

Sep 24 1993 12:26:11:710PM930924012John GoetzShot 012
Plasma
good current rise
still shaking in major radius

For Shot 013:
P_RCUR = 4. & D_RCUR = 4.
add dropout to gains of ZCUR(2) & ZCUR(3) from .75 to .76
raise PULSE_GAS_3 @ .2; lower after .5
more Ar
Ti injection @ .5 for calibration purposes

Sep 24 1993 12:41:14:770PM930924013John GoetzShot 013
Plasma - VDE @ .65 - shark fin @ .5 (a big 'un)
good current rise
still shaking in major radius although smaller in amplitude

For Shot 014:
P_RCUR = 6. & D_RCUR = 6.
raise PULSE_GAS_3 after .5

Sep 24 1993 12:58:21:270PM930924014John GoetzShot 014
Fizzle - should have gone

For Shot 015:
V_OH1 to -185V @ .005 (was -180) slow Bz ramp just a bit
IC_EF4 @ -1000 @ .35 (was .3) help power supply out of single-phase

Sep 24 1993 01:08:25:500PM930924015John GoetzShot 015
Fizzle - should have gone - fields o.k.

For Shot 016:
P_0 = 1.1e-5

Sep 24 1993 01:30:21:070PM930924016John GoetzShot 016
Fizzle - should have gone - fields o.k.

For Shot 017:
P_0 = 1.2e-5
V_EF3 to -2900 @ -.001 (slow down Bz ramp)

Sep 24 1993 01:44:51:830PM930924017John GoetzShot 017
Fizzle - should have gone

For Shot 018:
V_EF3 to -2800 @ -.001 (slow down Bz ramp)
offset on Br_0 now at +.0095

Sep 24 1993 02:02:40:020PM930924018John GoetzShot 018
Fizzle - should have gone - fields very good

For Shot 019:
delay PULSE_GAS_3 by .002
V_EF1's to -150V @ .002

Sep 24 1993 02:18:21:200PM930924019John GoetzShot 019
Fizzle - should have gone - fields very good
dies on inboard wall @ .018

For Shot 020:
V_OH1 to -150V @ .024 (was -70) slow down Bz ramp after .01

Sep 24 1993 02:32:08:590PM930924020John GoetzShot 020
Plasma - 470kA - VDE @ .72
shark fin @ .65 - density rising - current falling
current ramp slower - Bz ramp has less change of slope @ .01

For Shot 021:
no changes

Sep 24 1993 02:48:52:250PM930924021John GoetzShot 021
Fizzle - Br a little positive

For Shot 022:
V_OH1 -175 @ .005 & -160 @ .024 (smooth out Bz ramp)
offset on Br_0 now +.009

Sep 24 1993 03:11:26:080PM930924022John GoetzShot 022
Plasma - 470kA successful rampdown
a few hards throughout
smooth Bz ramp
RCUR oscillation reduced
data obtained for ZCUR studies

For Shot 023:
M_RCUR factors all increased by 1/3
zeroed EFC_current contribution to predictor on wire 3

Sep 24 1993 03:29:15:110PM930924023John GoetzShot 023
Plasma - 470kA VDE @ .62
current ramp fine - linear Bz ramp
shark fin @ .48 - shark fin disruption @ .55
RF power stepped from 80 to 120 kW

For Shot 024:
recalculate predictor on wire 3 - filament/nocoils predictor
raise fuel gas to 35V @ .07 & .11

Sep 24 1993 03:45:47:930PM930924024John GoetzShot 024
Plasma - 480kA - successful rampdown
current ramp fine - linear Bz ramp
RF turned on at .5 - moly injected - > 150kW

For Shot 025:
PULSE_GAS_2 50V from .4 to .425 (H2 minority)
remove 300A from EF1U and add 250A to EF2U for shaping from .2 on

Sep 24 1993 03:59:08:820PM930924025John GoetzShot 025
Plasma - 480kA - VDE @ .78
RF on @ .5 - lots of moly - 150kW average - 200 kW peak

For Shot 026:
PULSE_GAS_2 60V from .4 to .425 (H2 minority)
raised D_ZCUR(3) to 9.
more PULSE_GAS_3 @ .2

Sep 24 1993 04:09:50:310PM930924026John GoetzShot 026
Fizzle - fields look o.k. - Br too pos?

For Shot 027:
offset on Br_0 now .0085

Sep 24 1993 04:36:10:450PM930924027John GoetzShot 027
Plasma - VDE @ .575
hesitation in the current rise
hards the whole way

For Shot 028:
100V spike on PULSE_GAS_2
V_OH1 to -165 @ .005 & -170 @ .024 (help current rise)
raise all M_ZCUR(2) gains by factor of 8
lower P_ZCUR(2) to 2.

Sep 24 1993 04:49:35:090PM930924028John GoetzShot 028
Fizzle - fields o.k.

For Shot 029:
no RF

Sep 24 1993 04:57:16:490PM930924029John GoetzShot 029
Fizzle - fields o.k.

For Shot 030:
V_OH1 to -170 @ .005
P_0 = 1.0e-5

Sep 24 1993 05:15:23:630PM930924030John GoetzShot 030
plasma - successful rampdown - slight current rise hesitation
shark fin at the end

Sep 27 1993 01:57:14:620PM930924031Tom LukeThis is part of a series of shots performed on 930927 in order to
test the efficiency of the gas puffing system. The test were
performed b Artur Niemczewski and Thomas Luke using the ratiomatic
gas gauge. By pulsing the gas system and measuing the change in
pressure on the gauge, we will hopefully be able to determine the number
of particle being put in the machine per puff. Shot 31 was the first shot
The puff was 50 ms long and 60V high. The base pressure is 1.-e-5 torr.

Physics Operator Comments

Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
108:45:28:780AMTestOktest of the pulsed gas with D2
209:01:14:430AMPlasmaBadef4 single phased through zero
309:22:03:310AMPlasmaOkno faults
409:38:04:710AMPlasmaOkno faults
509:55:47:080AMPlasmaOkno faults
610:14:19:200AMPlasmaOkno faults
710:31:57:360AMPlasmaOkno faults
810:48:50:030AMPlasmaOkno faults
911:15:05:170AMPlasmaOkno faults
1011:32:31:140AMPlasmaOkef4 single phasing through zero
1111:49:57:250AMPlasmaOkno faults
1212:05:47:040PMPlasmaOkno faults
1312:26:07:020PMPlasmaOkno faults
1412:42:33:690PMPlasmaOkef4 single phasing through zero
1512:58:53:730PMPlasmaOkef4 single phasing thru zero
1601:15:05:980PMPlasmaOkno faults
1701:31:17:950PMPlasmaOkef4 single phased through zero
1801:46:50:690PMPlasmaOkef4 single phased through zero
1902:04:03:890PMPlasmaOkef4 single phased through zero
2002:19:14:380PMPlasmaOkno faults
2102:35:50:700PMPlasmaOkno faults
2202:54:14:960PMPlasmaOkno faults
2303:11:19:560PMPlasmaOkno faults
2403:29:26:800PMPlasmaOkno faults
2503:45:17:410PMPlasmaOkno faults
2604:00:18:970PMPlasmaOkef4 single phased through zero
2704:18:29:180PMPlasmaOkno faults
2804:37:31:510PMPlasmaOkno faults
2904:50:21:630PMPlasmaOkno faults
3005:04:39:220PMPlasmaOkno faults
3101:44:33:730PMTestBad