| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Yuichi Takase |
| Physics operator(s): | Joseph Snipes |
| Engineering operator(s): | Vinny Bertolino |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| first run after vac break |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:11:693PM |
| Author: To Be Determined |
| Session Leader's Run Summary for 941216 Run SL: Takase PO: Snipes EO: Bertolino The run objective was E-port antenna (B4C coated FS) commissioning: 1. to establish plasma tuning 2. antenna conditioning into plasma The target plasma was an inner-wall limited, mid-plane centered, high triangularity plasma we developed last week. Objective 1. was accomplished. Some more piggybacking will be needed to complete the tuner calibration, which will enable "one-shot matching". We need to continue working on Objective 2. We had 4 shots to raise the power (shots 021-024) after acceptable plasma tuning was established. We seem to be able to inject 0.5 MW reliably, and a little over 1 MW was achieved for a short time. Higher power pulses (> 0.5 MW) tend to end in what we think is an antenna arc, visible on the TV as a bright flash (don't be alarmed, this is why we need to condition the antenna with plasma, and it's clear we need some more time to contion). PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE POWER LEVELS QUOTED HERE ARE NOT OFFICIAL YET! (they can be off by a factor of two). Because a drive signal reconfiguration was made to enable two-antenna operation, we also scanned the D-port antenna power (up to 1.9 MW) to establish a correspondence table between the programmed voltage and the RF power into the plasma (for a particular loading). |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:36:52:490PM |
| Author: To Be Determined |
| Overall, it was a reasonably successful run despite problems with the EF1L power supply that led to a large number of fizzles and some later control problems. Problems with EF1 at breakdown led us to begin to use integral control for the EF1s. At first, we integrated from -0.3 sec to 0 with a gain of 1. This turned out to be too much. It was backed off toward the end of the run to start at -0.1 sec and then worked fine. We also tried to eliminate the late disruptions in the current rampdown by decreasing the proportional gain on the fast ZCUR (wire 3). It does not seem to have had much effect, since the Z oscillation around 1.2 sec was still there on the last shot, though it seems to come and go. Also, the cross-over of the OH1 supply at about 0.3 to 0.35 sec leads to some jumps in the loop voltage and changes in the radiation signals (bolometer, H alpha, Z meter) indicating that some impurities may be coming into the plasma at that time. This should be looked into and corrected. At the end of the day, the RF coupling was successful and that was the purpose of the run. Because of yesterday's opening, the run started late and because of Navratil's seminar, the run ended early. Still, there were 24 shots, 17 plasmas, and 7 fizzles. Shot,Duration(s),Ipmax(MA) Shot,Duration(s),Ipmax 1 0.000 0.032 2 0.000 0.037 3 0.931 0.838 4 0.000 0.024 5 0.907 0.822 6 1.454 0.822 7 1.456 0.822 8 1.451 0.822 9 0.402 0.466 10 0.000 0.039 11 0.000 0.039 12 0.000 0.037 13 1.442 0.822 14 0.399 0.683 15 1.363 0.825 16 1.368 0.825 17 0.000 0.024 18 1.373 0.830 19 1.362 0.822 20 1.359 0.825 21 1.374 0.822 22 1.380 0.822 23 1.363 0.828 24 1.375 0.822 |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Dec 16 1994 09:19:46:300AM | 941216001 | Yuichi Takase | Today's run: E port Antenna Commissioning (Tuning + Conditioning)
Start from 941214018 Shot 001: Fizzle |
| Dec 16 1994 09:34:34:080AM | 941216002 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 002: Fizzle
|
| Dec 16 1994 10:01:24:620AM | 941216003 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 003: plasma (disrupted @ 0.9s)
Starting to tune. |
| Dec 16 1994 10:50:02:700AM | 941216004 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 004: fizzle
|
| Dec 16 1994 10:53:16:530AM | 941216005 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 005: plasma (disrupt @ 0.9s)
|
| Dec 16 1994 10:53:58:350AM | 941216006 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 006: plasma
RF tripping |
| Dec 16 1994 11:36:48:490AM | 941216007 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 007: plasma
Started to get tuning data. nel_04=0.8; R_L=2.4Ohms (low loading) |
| Dec 16 1994 12:08:24:580PM | 941216008 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 008: plasma
nel_04=0.95; R_L=7Ohms. |
| Dec 16 1994 12:09:00:570PM | 941216009 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 009: plasma died early (0.4s)
|
| Dec 16 1994 12:09:40:920PM | 941216010 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 010: fizzle
|
| Dec 16 1994 12:28:50:840PM | 941216011 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 011: fizzle
|
| Dec 16 1994 12:43:17:330PM | 941216012 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 012: fizzle
|
| Dec 16 1994 01:41:18:870PM | 941216013 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 013: plasma
nel_04=1.0, R_L=6Ohms |
| Dec 16 1994 01:42:03:320PM | 941216014 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 014: plasma died early (0.4s)
|
| Dec 16 1994 01:56:51:550PM | 941216015 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 015: plasma
nel_04=1.0; R_L=5Ohms |
| Dec 16 1994 02:05:16:720PM | 941216016 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 016: plasma
nel_04=1.0; R_L=?Ohms (bad tune) |
| Dec 16 1994 02:12:42:180PM | 941216017 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 017:fizzle
|
| Dec 16 1994 02:37:36:900PM | 941216018 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 018: plasma
1.9MW from D port E port didn't go |
| Dec 16 1994 03:00:38:270PM | 941216019 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 019: plasma
no power from D port nel=1.0; R_L=5.5Ohms E port almost tuned |
| Dec 16 1994 03:14:53:360PM | 941216021 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 021: plasma
no power from D port (tripping) nel=1.0; R_L=6->4Ohms Refl=5%->25%; Pf/Pr=160/35kW |
| Dec 16 1994 03:32:07:960PM | 941216021 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 021: plasma
nel=1.0; R_L=4Ohms E port Pf/Pr=1.3/p.3MW D port 0.17/0.035MW |
| Dec 16 1994 03:43:26:520PM | 941216022 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 022: plasma
nel=1.0; R_L=4Ohms E port Pf/Pr=0.7/0.15MW D port 0.40/0.08MW |
| Dec 16 1994 03:58:39:870PM | 941216023 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 023: plasma
nel=1.0; R_L=4Ohms moved RCUR out 5mm E port Pf/Pr=0.9/0.1MW D port 0.75/0.08MW |
| Dec 16 1994 05:31:22:470PM | 941216024 | Yuichi Takase | Shot 024: plasma
nel=1.0; R_L=6Ohms moved RCUR out another 5mm outer gap=1cm E port Pf/Pr=0.6/0.03MW D port 1.2/0.07MW |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Dec 16 1994 10:19:28:530AM | 941216001 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 1
Fizzle! |
| Dec 16 1994 10:20:16:170AM | 941216002 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 2
Fizzle! |
| Dec 16 1994 10:26:28:520AM | 941216003 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 3
Got plasma, but disrupted at about 0.95 sec. The EF2 power supply current limit was set to 3 kA when it should have been 4 kA. The railing of the power supply apparently led to plasma control problems. |
| Dec 16 1994 10:27:02:150AM | 941216004 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 4
Fizzle! |
| Dec 16 1994 10:28:54:870AM | 941216005 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 5
Got plasma, but there was an EF1L crowbar that brought the plasma down early and led to a disruption at 0.9 sec. |
| Dec 16 1994 10:59:54:470AM | 941216006 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 6
Got plasma and it lasted quite long. Thrashing around 0.5 sec may be due to EF2 reaching its current limit. So, for the next shot, we will move the upper X point RXU from -3.5 cm to -3.0 cm and the RXL from -2.5 cm to -3.0 cm. |
| Dec 16 1994 11:03:42:600AM | 941216007 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 7
Good plasma! |
| Dec 16 1994 11:37:15:000AM | 941216008 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 8
Checking EF1 power supply for 15 minutes before this shot. Then, raising the density from 8 x 10^19 m^-2 to 9 x 10^19 m^-2. Good shot! |
| Dec 16 1994 11:56:41:350AM | 941216009 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 9
Raising the density from 9 x 10^19 m^-2 to 1 x 10^20 m^-2. EF1L power supply failure. Plasma died early around 0.15 sec. |
| Dec 16 1994 12:27:25:580PM | 941216010 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 10
Fizzle! |
| Dec 16 1994 12:36:38:850PM | 941216011 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 11
Fizzle! Wires 11 and 12 (EF1U,L) on integrator channel C. Integral gain on EF1U and EF1L from -0.2 sec to 0 sec with a gain of 1 for shot 12. |
| Dec 16 1994 01:09:47:170PM | 941216012 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 12
Fizzle! For shot 13, we reduced the OH1 voltage by 25 V and OH2U and L by 5 V. Changed integrator on EF1s to start at -0.3 sec and changed the gain from 2 to 3. Moved the proportional gain step down to -0.2 sec. The motivation for the OH1 and OH2 changes was to reduce the current rise since it seems to be increasing too rapidly. The EF1 changes are to make us less dependent on random changes in the EF1 power supply. |
| Dec 16 1994 01:15:53:840PM | 941216013 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 12
Fizzle! For shot 13, we reduced the OH1 voltage by 25 V and OH2U and L by 5 V. Changed integrator on EF1s to start at -0.3 sec and changed the gain from 2 to 3. Moved the proportional gain step down to -0.2 sec. The motivation for the OH1 and OH2 changes was to reduce the current rise since it seems to be increasing too rapidly. The EF1 changes are to make us less dependent on random changes in the EF1 power supply. |
| Dec 16 1994 01:23:31:550PM | 941216013 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 13
Good plasma! Apparently with some luck. There are still differences between EF1U and EF1L that we are trying to sort out. For shot 14 Horne lowered the pre-programmed EF1U and L voltages before 0.1 sec to reduce the demand. |
| Dec 16 1994 01:39:47:730PM | 941216014 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 14
Plasma died early at about 0.4 sec. While there are problems with the EF1L supply, it seems that the early drop in the proportional gain may also be a problem. |
| Dec 16 1994 01:46:13:640PM | 941216015 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 15
Keeping the proportional gain up until -0.02 sec instead of stepping it down at -0.3 sec. Decent plasma. Disrupted at 1.35 sec. |
| Dec 16 1994 02:06:40:650PM | 941216016 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 16
Changed EF1U and L integral gain turn on from -0.3 sec to -0.1 sec to reduce the amount of time of integration to reduce the accumulated error. Good shot! Disrupted late again. |
| Dec 16 1994 02:19:24:090PM | 941216017 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 17
Dropped density at 0.85 sec to try to avoid the late disruption-in-tail. Fizzle! |
| Dec 16 1994 02:48:27:510PM | 941216018 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 18
Lowered fill pressure to 1.4 x 10^-5 Torr. Decent plasma. Disrupted late. |
| Dec 16 1994 02:50:33:570PM | 941216019 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 19
Good shot! Disrupted late again. For shot 20, moved RCUR in by about 8 mm at 0.85 sec and throughout the rampdown. Also moved CLEARIN in by a small amount at the same time. |
| Dec 16 1994 03:22:44:720PM | 941216020 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 20
Good shot! |
| Dec 16 1994 03:24:31:580PM | 941216021 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 21
Good shot! For shot 22, reducing proportional gain on fast ZCUR wire 3 after 1.2 sec from 8 to 6 to attempt to get rid of the Z oscillations late in the hope that the plasma will be more stable in the rampdown to avoid the late disruption. |
| Dec 16 1994 03:45:13:190PM | 941216022 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 22
Good shot! For shot 23, raising the prefill to 1.5 x 10^-5 Torr to try to eliminate the hard x rays. Also moving RCUR out by 5 mm to improve RF coupling. |
| Dec 16 1994 04:05:02:480PM | 941216023 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 23
Good Shot! |
| Dec 16 1994 04:05:30:330PM | 941216024 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 24
Good Shot! |
| Dec 16 1994 05:31:57:170PM | 941216024 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 24
Good Shot! |
| Dec 16 1994 05:32:02:320PM | 941216024 | Joseph Snipes | Shot 24
Good Shot! |
| Dec 16 1994 05:35:53:040PM | 941216024 | Joseph Snipes | Overall, it was a reasonably successful run despite problems with the EF1L
power supply that led to a large number of fizzles and some later control problems. At the end of the day, the RF coupling was successful and that was the purpose of the run. Because of yesterday's opening, the run started late and because of Navratil's seminar, the run ended early. Still, there were 24 shots, 17 plasmas, and 7 fizzles. |
| Dec 16 1994 05:47:24:220PM | 941216024 | Joseph Snipes | Problems with EF1 at breakdown led us to begin to use integral control for
the EF1s. At first, we integrated from -0.3 sec to 0 with a gain of 1. This turned out to be too much. It was backed off toward the end of the run to start at -0.1 sec and then worked fine. We also tried to eliminate the late disruptions in the current rampdown by decreasing the proportional gain on the fast ZCUR (wire 3). It does not seem to have had much effect, since the Z oscillation around 1.2 sec was still there on the last shot, though it seems to come and go. Also, the cross-over of the OH1 supply at about 0.3 to 0.35 sec leads to some jumps in the loop voltage and changes in the radiation signals (bolometer, H alpha, Z meter) indicating that some impurities may be coming into the plasma at that time. This should be looked into and corrected. |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 09:13:11:660AM | Plasma | Ok | fizzel |
| 2 | 09:26:16:250AM | Plasma | Ok | fizzle |
| 3 | 09:43:39:230AM | Plasma | Ok | 0.8MA disruption |
| 4 | 10:06:08:850AM | Plasma | Ok | fizzle |
| 5 | 10:18:15:250AM | Plasma | Ok | comm fault ef1, oh1oh2 |
| 6 | 10:33:29:830AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 7 | 10:54:43:610AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 8 | 11:34:53:870AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 9 | 11:47:36:280AM | Plasma | Bad | ef1l comm fault |
| 10 | 12:05:58:680PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 11 | 12:18:06:450PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 12 | 12:38:32:010PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 13 | 01:07:21:600PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 14 | 01:22:52:290PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 15 | 01:40:25:280PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 16 | 01:54:01:810PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 17 | 02:10:54:800PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 18 | 02:21:43:930PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 19 | 02:38:20:480PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 20 | 02:55:42:260PM | Plasma | Bad | ef1l comm fault |
| 21 | 03:12:54:110PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 22 | 03:29:54:240PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 23 | 03:46:17:400PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 24 | 04:03:07:070PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |