Alcator C-Mod Run 941219 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:068a
Date Filed:11/28/1994
Title:Effect of plasma outer gap on divertor characteristics
First Author:Bruce Lipschultz
Session Leader:Bruce Lipschultz (shots 1-32)

Operators
Session leader(s):Bruce Lipschultz
Physics operator(s):John Goetz
Engineering operator(s):Vinny Bertolino

Engineering Operator Run Comment
outer gap effects

Session Leader Plans

Physics Operators Plans

Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:11:710PM
Author: To Be Determined
Run of 941213
Physics Operator - J. Goetz
Session Leader - B. Lipschultz
Engineering - V. Bartolino

MP# 68A: Effect of plasma outer gap on divetor characteristics

Mini-proposal 68A is considered accomplished. We were able to vary the gap over
the range desired and obtained all the required data. The loading resistance v
as predicted; increasing by about a factor of 2 (from 5 - 10 ohms)
as the outer gap was reduced
from 2.1 cm to 0.5 cm. The effects on the outer divertor were less clear.
The domed probe #9 located at ~ 1.2 cm in rho was unaffected even when the
outer gap was reduced to 0.5 cm. On the other hand, the inner divertor
showed an increase in current as the gap was reduced. So at first glance,
the divertor parameters were relatively unaffected by the change in gap. We
still need to look at things like radiated power and neutral pressure.

There were some additional things to note about this run:

(1) H-mode dithering shots were achieved when the RF power was turned up -
shots 27 & 28. At each sawtooth crash the H-alpha @ H-port would go into
oscillation for a short period. The ISAT currents at the outer divertor
plate private flux region correlate almost exactly with the H-alpha. There
is similar behaviour at the inner divertor except the common flux region ISats
oscillate before the private flux regions.

(2) We finally achieved divertor detachment without an impurity injection.
This required raising nebar above 2.0e20 which is much higher than the
previous 2 run periods (threshold was more like 1.3e20). The transition
was much less abrupt in these examples of detachment (shots 29-32). We did
see the characteristics of localized detachment in shots 29 (no RF) and
32 (RF-reattachment).

(3) The antenna loading was very high (30 ohms) at the highest densities (shot
32). This was at the larger outer gap of 1.8 - 1.9 cm.

The shot summary/comments follow:

shot 1: power supply test

shot2: disrupt at 420 ms. The density and kappa both were high (2e20, 1.8)

shot 3: This went the full length. Nebar ~ 1.7e20. Outer gap was fine (2cm)
with the inner gap a little too small.

shot 6: gaps fine; 2.15 cm outside, 1.5 at inside.

shot 7: The probe went in this shot. However, Brian felt that we should
repeat it because the probes is 'still cleaning up'. Also, the RF power was
low for some reason.

shot 8: Repeat of shot 7 but the RF didn't fire. We will continue the program
by reducing the outer gap (reducing plasma current center radius).

shot 9: Outer gap reduced to 1.9-2 cm over most of the shot. It is smaller
at the earliest times before the probe insertion time (.6 seconds). John Rice
is going to increase the Ar on the next shot by 50% to get more signal.

shot 10: All went well for the probe and RF. Next shot we will
reduce the gap by ~ 2mm. John R. has again requested an increase in the
Ar puff to get his signal. He only obtained a 25% increase in
signal from a 50% increase in plenum pressure.
I have acquiesed (sp?) in that the radiated
power seems unaffected by the previous increase.

shot 11: fizzle

shot 12: fine with outer gap of 1.5 cm. Probe will go in the next shot.

shot 13: All went fine with RF and probe with this gap. The probe seemed
to get additional triggers during the second scan which caused it not to
pull back in the ususal way. It hesitated on the way out. The outer
divertor strike points were very constant in position.

shot 14: The gap is in the range 1.1 - 1.35 cm. This is acceptable given
the rest of the conditions are good. The Ar will be off the next shot to
see if there is residual Ar affecting the penetration measurements. Francesca
reports that the penetration efficiency for Ar has been varying; increasing
as the gap is decreased.

shot 15: The probe and RF were fine. The gap varied from 1. cm to 1.25 cm
over the course of the shot. We will try to keep the outer gap more constant
at ~ .9 to 1 cm for the next shot with no probe scan.
The radiated power (2pi) dropped by 1/3 with the Ar off. We will
reinstate the Ar for the next shot but with a shorter puff.

shot 16: EF supply problem and plasma disrupted at .6 sec. Repeat again
without probe scan

shot 17: This shot didn't disrupt. However the position (outer gap and strike
points) is varying too much. We will try again before doing the probe insertion
shot.

shot 18: The position seems more constant this shot - .7 cm outer gap.
The strike points seem pretty good too. No probe insertion this shot. We
will have on the next.

shot 19: Another probelem with EF1, the plasma disrupted. Try again

shot 20: This shot was fine but the probe was not enabled so will do it again.

shot 21: The probe went, this is fine for .7 - .8 outer gap.

shot 22: Gap is good at ~ 0.5 mm. We will replay this shot with
probe insertion.

shot 23: All went well with RF and probe insertion. Outer gap of
0.5 cm again. Next shot change outer gap to ~ 1.75 cm.

shot 24: We are back to an outer gap of 1.75 cm. Probe will be inserted
the next shot.

shot 25: This ends the scan in gaps. We will now stay at this gap and
change the RF power programming. The first and second pulses have been
~ 10kW and 500kW respectively. These will now be changed to 0.5 and 1.0
MW respectively. The probe will not be inserted the next shot while
we tune up the position of the x-point.

shot 26: The x-point position looks better. The probe will go in the next shot.
The RF power was 0.5 MW and 1.0 MW.

shot 27: 1.0 and 1.7 MW RF with a good probe scan. We will repeat at slightly
higher power. On looking back at this shot it appears that at these high
RF powers the plasma is dithering around H-mode. G has pointed out that
the oscillations on the H-alpha correlate with the sawtooth crash. An
added twist to this is that I noticed that the H-alpha (H-port) oscillations
look just like the oscillations on Isat in the private flux region of the
outer divertor.

shot 28: 1.0 and 1.8 MW pulses of RF. Good probe scan through SOL. Next
shot we will leave the RF power at low levels and try to see how high
we can raise the density. The plasma current will be ramped up 50 kA during the
of .5 - 1.0 sec.

shot 29: Nebar increased to 2. e20. ramping during the current 'flattop'.
We will try and make the density as constant as possible the next shot -
the probe will fire and the RF power will be in the usual 2 steps - 10kW
and 0.5 MW.

shot 30: This is significantly different. Although nebar is not much
higher (2.4e20)
it appears that the divertor plasma is going in and out of detachment.
The evidence is that all the probes in the outer divertor below the
nose have Isat currents which are oscilating over about a 100 ms time scale.
When the Isats in the divertor decrease, nebar increases in the main plasma.
The RF faulted on this shot. For the next shot we will increase the density further.

shot 31: Definite detachment on this shot! Nebar ~ 2.3 e20 when the
current on probes 1-7 in th divertor (outer) drop. We then increased nebar
to 2.8e20 before the end of the shot. No RF power.

shot 32: We kept the density the same and tried to put RF power in. The
loading resistance was enormous (30 ohms) but only 400 kW was put in. This was
enough to nudge the divertor plasma towards reattachment; The Isat currents
increased every time the RF power was stepped up.


Physics Operator Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:36:52:503PM
Author: To Be Determined
Physics operator summary for 941219

EO: Bertilino
PO: Goetz
SL: Lipschultz

Run 941219 was in support of Mini-Proposal #068A - Effect of outer gap
on divertor characteristics. The goal of this mini-proposal is to determine
the minimum gap between the separatrix and the antenna required to obtain
the best divertor operation.

Program for this run:
Vary the outer gap from 2.0 to 0.6 cm in 0.2 cm steps
two RF pulses per shot - one low power, one high power ( >0.5MW)
Insert fast-scanning probe (FSP) into the SOL during each RF pulse

This goal was accomplished and then some. A scan of outer gap was done, from
0.4cm to 1.9cm. The preliminary results will be summarized in the session
leader's summary. A power scan at fixed gap and a density scan were also
performed at the same gap.

Some things discovered today:
1) Work on the ramp-down segment still needs to be performed. Moving
both the x-points further away from the plasma seemed to help get the
current almost all the way down. At the higher densities, shark fins
were the norm. The density was just too high for the given current.
2) Some attention needs to be payed to the x-point and gap controllers.
Ramping the drawn waveform will help to hold the gaps and positions
constant through the shot.
3) The machine ran well today. Helium ECDC was performed over the weekend
as was deuterium ECDC. Recovery from all disruptions was seen. After
the two EF1 disruptions, hard x-rays were measured on the succeeding
shots. One fizzle was had today for no apparent reason.

Engineering today: EF1L had two comm. faults today. Both led to disruptions
during the shot. Otherwise, a good day.

Scorecard: 32 shots = 30 plasmas + 1 fizzles + 1 p.s. test

Shot summary for Run 941219

Reload of 941206025

Changes to shot 941206025:
copy segment 1 from 941216024 (use startup changes from last week)
Rename NL_07 to NL_04 and draw 1.0e20
add I gain to CLEARIN = 0.5 at 0.05sec
RCUR offset = 10000. in segment 2

Shot change result
____ _____ ______
1 OH stack test shot - o.k.

2 P_0 = 1.5e-5 plasma - disr. at 0.41
kappa>1.8 delta>0.6

3 RCUR = .66 plasma - disr. at 0.2MA
kappa=1.6; outer=2.5 inner=1.5

4 NL_04=9e19 with break @ .825 plasma - disr @ 1.31sec
raise CLEARIN I gain to 2 no change in inner gap
outer=2.5cm; kappa=1.6

5 RCUR=.665 plasma - disr. @ 1.29sec
outer=1.6cm; inner=1.5->1.0

6 enable B_SIDE_LOWER plasma - disr @ 1.43
RCUR=.6625; CLEARIN=-.005 outer=2.2; inner=1.5; kappa=1.6
ZXU and ZXL constant during rampdown

7 CLEARIN=-.004 plasma
2.3PSIA in B_SIDE_LOWER and one outer=2.2; inner=1.5; kappa=1.6
pulse on PG1
fire FSP

8 PG1=90Vx.024sec plasma - disr. @ 1.29
ZXU and ZXL ramp out during rampdown outer=2.1 inner=1.5 kappa=1.63
move RXL out by .005 during flattop no RF
fire FSP

9 RCUR=.664 (start gap scan) plasma - disr @ 1.3
PG1=90Vx.034sec outer=1.9 inner=1.5 kappa=1.62
RXL=-.006

10 2.7PSIA in B_SIDE_LOWER plasma - disr. @ 1.37
fire FSP outer=1.9 inner=1.5 kappa=1.62

11 NL_04 break @ 0.9sec fizzle - everything looks o.k.
CLEARIN=-.003 and RCUR=.667
3.9PSIA in B_SIDE_LOWER
yank ZXU and ZXL out harder during ramp

12 no changes plasma - disr. @ 1.32
outer=1.5 inner=1.5 kappa=1.61

13 RXL=-.01 (after ramp) fire FSP plasma - disr @ 1.25
outer=1.5 inner=1.5 kappa=1.60

14 RXL=-.012 (after ramp) plasma - disr. @ 1.27
RCUR=.6685 and CLEARIN=-.002 outer=1.1->1.3 inner=1.5

15 disable B_SIDE_LOWER plasma - disr. @ 1.15
yank in CLEARIN and RCUR outer=1.0->1.3 inner=1.5

16 turn on P gain on ZXU plasma - disr. @ 0.7
undo CLEARIN and RCUR yank EF1L comm. fault @ 0.55
enable B_SIDE_LOWER and PG1=90Vx.026sec crowbar @ 0.6
RCUR=.67 after 0.7sec

17 RCUR = 0.67 @ 0.5sec plasma - disr @ 1.33
outer=0.8->1.2 inner=1.5

18 RXL=-.006 plasma - disr @ 1.4
RCUR=0.671 @ 0.7sec outer=0.7 inner=1.5 kappa=1.57

19 no changes plasma - disr @ 0.31
EF1L comm fault @ 0.20

20 no changes plasma - disr. @ 1.45
outer=0.75 inner=1.5 kappa=1.57

21 no changes plasma - disr. @ 1.45
outer=0.75 inner=1.5 kappa=1.57

22 RCUR=.6725 and RXL=-.005 plasma - disr. @ 1.4
outer=0.5 inner=1.5 kappa=1.56

23 RXL=-.007 and fire FSP plasma - disr. @ 1.4
outer=0.5 inner=1.5 kappa=1.56

24 RCUR=.6655 plasma - disr. @ 1.43
outer=1.75 inner=1.5 kappa=1.61

25 no changes plasma - disr. @ 1.43
outer=1.75 inner=1.5 kappa=1.62

26 RXL=-.095 plasma - disr. @ 1.46 Prf=1.0MW
RF two steps - 0.5 & 1.0 MW outer=1.8 inner=1.5 kappa=1.61

27 more RF plasma - disr. @1.46 Prf=1.5MW
outer=1.8 inner=1.5 kappa=1.61

28 more RF plasma - disr. @1.45 Prf=1.75
outer=1.75 inner=1.5 kappa=1.61

29 ramp Ip to -850000 plasma - disr. @ 1.33
ramp NL_04 to 1.35e20 outer=1.75 inner=1.5 kappa=1.61
no RF power

30 NL_04=1.5e20 and hold gain on plasma - disr. @ 1.3
until 1.5sec outer=1.9 inner=1.5 kappa=1.63

31 NL_04=1.75e20 plasma - disr. @ 1.27
outer=1.9->2.1 inner=1.5->1.7

32 no changes plasma - disr. @ 1.28
outer=1.8->2.0 inner=1.5->1.7


Session Leader Comments
Dec 19 1994 08:32:21:810AMBruce LipschultzRun of 941213
Physics Operator - J. Goetz
Session Leader - B. Lipschultz
Engineering - V. Bartolino

MP# 68A: Effect of plasma outer gap on divetor characteristics

The approach for these studies is to vary the outer gap
and observe the effect on both RF coupling and divertor characteristics
(temperature, density, profile shapes, divertor detachment)
of these changes.
For each gap value the characteristics of the SOL and divertor will be
measured at low and high RF power.

We will vary the gap by 2 mm from 2 cm to 0.6 cm. There will
be 2 shots for each gap value. The first shot will allow the determination of
the separatrix location needed for insertion of the fast-scanning probe on the
second shot. The fast-scanning probe will be inserted twice during the shot;
once during a 200-300 ms long low-power RF pulse, once during a 200-300 ms high
RF pulse ($\ge 500$ kW). The magnetic equilibrium should be as close to
identical as possible at the 2 probe insertion yimes.
The density will be fixed during the shot such that
the plasma is attached before the RF.

Dec 19 1994 08:48:29:470AM941219002Bruce Lipschultzshot 2: The density screamed upto 2.e20 and the plasma disrupted at 420 ms.
The main cause was probably the kappa being about 1.8

Dec 19 1994 10:08:31:770AM941219006Bruce Lipschultzshot 6: This looks fine; outer gap 2.15 cm, inner gap 1.5 cm. We will
start the mp using this shot. 6 will be the baseline, on #7 Brian will
insert the probe on the next shot.

Dec 19 1994 10:17:27:270AM941219007Bruce Lipschultzshot 7: Brian felt that the probe may still be cleaning up. We will
repeat this shot. Also the RF power dropped to .4 MW for some unknown reason.

Dec 19 1994 10:39:30:970AM941219008Bruce Lipschultzshot 8: Probe went in fine but the RF didn't fire.
The RF faulted and didn't fire. We will continue
the program by reducing the outer gap.

Dec 19 1994 10:57:58:140AM941219009Bruce Lipschultzshot 9: The outer gap was reduced to ~ 1.9 cm and the shot went fine.
No probe insertions, this shot will be used to determine the insertion
depth for shot 10.

Dec 19 1994 11:12:34:120AM941219010Bruce Lipschultzshot 10: All went well for the probe and RF. Next shot we will
reduce the gap by ~ 2mm. John R. has again requested an increase in the
Ar puff to get his signal. He only obtained a 25% increase in
signal from a 50% increase in plenum pressure.
I have acquiesed (sp?) in that the radiated
power seems unaffected by the previous increase.

Dec 19 1994 11:59:25:130AM941219013Bruce Lipschultzshot 13: all went well for this shot. Probe and RF fired and the
outer gap was 1.4-1.5 cm.

Dec 19 1994 12:21:05:420PM941219014Bruce Lipschultzshot 14: The gap is in the range 1.1 - 1.35 cm. This is acceptable given
the rest of the conditions are good. The Ar will be off the next shot.
No probe insertion this shot (just a test into the
nether regions of the plasma. The probe will fire on the next shot.

Dec 19 1994 12:33:18:480PM941219015Bruce Lipschultzshot 15: The probe and RF were fine. The gap varied from 1. cm to 1.25 cm
over the course of the shot. We will try to keep the outer gap more constant
at ~ .9 to 1 cm for the next shot with no probe scan.
The radiated power (2pi) dropped by 1/3 with the Ar off. We will
reinstate the Ar for the next shot but with a shorter puff.

Dec 19 1994 12:51:55:580PM941219016Bruce Lipschultzshot 16: EF supply problem and plasma disrupted at .6 sec. Repeat again
without probe scan

Dec 19 1994 01:21:15:520PM941219018Bruce Lipschultzshot 18: The position seems more constant this shot - .7 cm outer gap.
The strike points seem pretty good too. No probe insertion this shot. We
will have on the next.

Dec 19 1994 01:29:25:830PM941219019Bruce Lipschultzshot 19: Another probelem with EF1, the plasma disrupted. Try again.

Dec 19 1994 01:56:39:150PM941219020Bruce Lipschultzshot 20: This shot was fine but the probe was not enabled so will do it again.

Dec 19 1994 01:58:09:590PM941219021Bruce Lipschultzshot 21: The probe went, this is fine for .7 - .8 outer gap. We will
reduce the gap to ~ .6 cm next shot.

Dec 19 1994 02:19:22:680PM941219022Bruce Lipschultzshot 22: Gap is good at ~ 0.5 mm. We will replay this shot with
probe insertion.

Dec 19 1994 02:39:22:650PM941219023Bruce Lipschultzshot 23: All went well with RF and probe insertion. Outer gap of
0.5 cm again. Next shot change outer gap to ~ 1.75 cm.

Dec 19 1994 02:54:43:660PM941219024Bruce Lipschultzshot 24: We are back to an outer gap of 1.75 cm. Probe will be inserted
the next shot.

Dec 19 1994 03:13:38:650PM941219025Bruce Lipschultzshot 25: This ends the scan in gaps. We will now stay at this gap and
change the RF power programming. The first and second pulses have been
~ 10kW and 500kW respectively. These will now be changed to 0.5 and 1.0
MW respectively. The probe will not be inserted the next shot while
we tune up the position of the x-point.

Dec 19 1994 03:29:37:810PM941219026Bruce Lipschultzshot 26: The x-point position looks better. The probe will go in the next shot.
The RF power was 0.5 MW and 1.0 MW.

Dec 19 1994 03:55:41:580PM941219027Bruce Lipschultzshot 27: 1.0 and 1.7 MW pulses of RF. Good probe scan through SOL.

Dec 19 1994 03:59:49:120PM941219028Bruce Lipschultzshot 28: 1.0 and 1.8 MW pulses of RF. Good probe scan through SOL. Next
shot we will leave the RF power at low levels and try to see how high
we can raise the density. The plasma current will be ramped up 50 kA during the
of .5 - 1.0 sec.

Dec 19 1994 04:18:45:300PM941219029Bruce Lipschultzshot 29: Nebar increased to 2. e20. ramping during the current 'flattop'.
We will try and make the density as constant as possible the next shot -
the probe will fire and the RF power will be in the usual 2 steps - 10kW
and 0.5 MW.

Dec 19 1994 04:39:48:640PM941219030Bruce Lipschultzshot 30: This is significantly different. Although nebar is not much
higher (2.4e20)
it appears that the divertor plasma is going in and out of detachment.
The evidence is that all the probes in the outer divertor below the
nose have Isat currents which are oscilating over about a 100 ms time scale.
When the Isats in the divertor decrease, nebar increases in the main plasma.
The RF faulted on this shot. For the next shot we will increase the density further.

Dec 19 1994 05:18:01:320PM941219030Bruce Lipschultzshot 30: This is significantly different. Although nebar is not much
higher (2.4e20)
it appears that the divertor plasma is going in and out of detachment.
The evidence is that all the probes in the outer divertor below the
nose have Isat currents which are oscilating over about a 100 ms time scale.
When the Isats in the divertor decrease, nebar increases in the main plasma.
The RF faulted on this shot. For the next shot we will increase the density further.

Dec 19 1994 05:22:53:190PM941219032Bruce Lipschultzshot 32: We kept the density the same and tried to put RF power in. The
loading resistance was enormous (30 ohms) but only 400 kW was put in. This was
enough to nudge the divertor plasma towards reattachemnt; The Isat currents
increased every time the RF power was stepped up.

Physics Operator Comments
Dec 19 1994 08:22:54:600AMJohn GoetzRun 941219 is in support of Mini-Proposal 068A - Effect of outer gap
on divertor characteristics.

This run will hopefully determine the minimum gap between the separatrix
and the antenna required to obtain the best divertor operation.

Program for the run:
Start from 941206025
Vary the outer gap from 2.0 to 0.6 cm in 0.2 cm steps
Two RF pulses per shot - one low power, one high power ( >0.5MW)
Insert fast-scanning probe (FSP) into the SOL during each pulse

Changes:
Load segment 1 from 941216024 - try and use the breakdown stuff
learned over the week of 941212
change name of wire NL_07 to NL_04 in segment 2 and draw 1e20
add I gain of 0.5 to CLEARIN wire
add offset of 10000 to RCUR in segment 2
change Ip rampdown rate

Dec 19 1994 08:28:40:930AM941219001John GoetzShot 941219001:
OH stack test shot - 10kA under PLC control

Dec 19 1994 08:52:27:350AM941219002John GoetzShot 941219002:
Plasma - disrupts at 0.41sec when kappa becomes > 1.8
density varying wildly
triangularities of > 0.6

For Shot 941219003:
draw RCUR = 0.66
CLEARIN = -.01
NL_04=7.5e19 and stairstep on gain for NL_04

Dec 19 1994 09:04:35:870AM941219003John GoetzShot 941219003:
Plasma - disrupts at 0.2MA
outer gap = 2.0cm; inner gap=1.5->1.0 cm; kappa=1.6

For Shot 941219004:
NL_04=9e19; break point @ 0.825sec
raise CLEAIN I gain to 2 in steps

Dec 19 1994 09:24:27:650AM941219004John GoetzShot 941219004:
Plasma - disrupts @ 1.31
outer gap = 2.5cm; inner gap=1.5->1.0 cm; kappa=1.6
nl_04=1.0e20

For Shot 941219005:
RCUR = .665 (close up the outer gap)

Dec 19 1994 09:51:47:200AM941219005John GoetzShot 941219005:
Plasma - disrupts @ 1.29
outer gap = 1.6cm; inner gap=1.5->1.0 cm; kappa=1.6
nl_04=0.94e20

For Shot 941219006:
RCUR = .6625 (more outer gap)
ramp CLEARIN to -.005 (to hold inner gap)
ZXU and ZXL drawn flat during rampdown
enable B_SIDE_LOWER (for Ar)

Dec 19 1994 10:07:45:800AM941219006John GoetzShot 941219006:
Plasma - disrupts @ 1.43sec
outer gap = 2.2cm; inner gap=1.5cm; kappa=1.6
nl_04=0.95e20

For Shot 941219007:
CLEARIN=-.004
one pulse on PG1 and 2.35PSIA in B_SIDE_LOWER

Dec 19 1994 10:24:38:130AM941219007John GoetzShot 941219007:
Plasma - disrupts @ 1.43sec
outer gap = 2.2cm; inner gap=1.5cm; kappa=1.6
nl_04=0.95e20

For Shot 941219008:
PG1 = 90V x .024sec
ZXU and ZXL ramp out during rampdown
ramp RXL out by .005 during shot

Dec 19 1994 10:40:15:050AM941219008John GoetzShot 941219008:
Plasma - disrupts @ 1.29sec
outer gap = 2.1cm; inner gap=1.5cm; kappa=1.63

For Shot 941219009:
PG1 = 90V x .034sec
RCUR=.664
remove ZXU and ZXL changes from 008
RXL=-.006

Dec 19 1994 10:55:25:260AM941219009John GoetzShot 941219009:
Plasma - disrupts @ 1.3sec
outer gap = 1.9cm; inner gap=1.5->1.4cm; kappa=1.62

For Shot 941219010:
2.7PSIA in B_SIDE_LOWER
fire FSP

Dec 19 1994 11:11:53:160AM941219010John GoetzShot 9412190010:
Plasma - disrupts @ 1.37sec
outer gap = 1.9cm; inner gap=1.5->1.4cm; kappa=1.62

For Shot 941219011:
3.9PSIA in B_SIDE_LOWER
yank ZXU and RXU out harder during rampdown
NL_04 break @ 0.9sec
CLEARIN=-.003 and RCUR=.667

Dec 19 1994 11:29:41:820AM941219011John GoetzShot 9412190011:
Fizzle - everything looks fine

For Shot 941219012:
no changes

Dec 19 1994 11:48:16:030AM941219012John GoetzShot 9412190012:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.32
kappa=1.61; inner=1.5; outer=1.5

For Shot 941219013:
RXL=-.01 (after ramp)
fire FSP

Dec 19 1994 12:00:04:560PM941219013John GoetzShot 9412190013:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.25
kappa=1.60; inner=1.5; outer=1.5

For Shot 941219014:
RXL=-.012 (after ramp)
RCUR=.6685 and CLEARIN=-.002 (after ramp)

Dec 19 1994 12:20:00:700PM941219014John GoetzShot 9412190014:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.27
kappa=1.60; inner=1.5; outer=1.1->1.3

For Shot 941219015:
disable B_SIDE_LOWER
yank in CLEARIN and RCUR during rampdown

Dec 19 1994 12:32:55:440PM941219015John GoetzShot 9412190015:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.15
kappa=1.60; inner=1.5; outer=1.0->1.3

For Shot 941219016:
enable B_SIDE_LOWER and PG1=90Vx.026sec
remove yank in CLEARIN and RCUR during rampdown
turn on P gain (=2) on ZXU during rampdown
RCUR=.67 from 0.7 on

Dec 19 1994 12:52:57:940PM941219016John GoetzShot 9412190016:
Plasma - disr. @ 0.7
EF1L comm fault at 0.55 - crowbar at 0.6

For Shot 941219017:
RCUR=0.67 @ 0.5sec

Dec 19 1994 01:08:41:020PM941219017John GoetzShot 9412190017:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.33
outer=0.8->1.2 inner=1.5 kappa=1.58

For Shot 941219018:
RCUR=0.671 @ 0.7sec ( try and stop the outer gap growth)
RXL=-.006 (RXL was moving last shot)

Dec 19 1994 01:20:12:880PM941219018John GoetzShot 9412190018:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.4
outer=0.7 inner=1.5 kappa=1.57

For Shot 941219019:
fire FSP

Dec 19 1994 01:33:32:950PM941219019John GoetzShot 9412190019:
Plasma - disr. @ 0.31
EF1L comm. fault @ 0.2

For Shot 941219020:
fire FSP

Dec 19 1994 01:46:41:850PM941219020John GoetzShot 9412190020:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.45
outer=0.75->0.8 inner=1.5 kappa=1.57
no FSP

For Shot 941219021:
fire FSP

Dec 19 1994 02:00:28:650PM941219021John GoetzShot 9412190021:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.45
outer=0.75->0.8 inner=1.5 kappa=1.57

For Shot 941219022:
RCUR=0.6725 (smaller gap yet)
RXL=-.005

Dec 19 1994 02:19:36:800PM941219022John GoetzShot 9412190022:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.4
outer=0.5 inner=1.5 kappa=1.56

For Shot 941219023:
RXL=-.007 (after ramp) to try to hold constant
fire FSP

Dec 19 1994 02:35:22:630PM941219023John GoetzShot 9412190023:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.41
outer=0.5 inner=1.5 kappa=1.56

For Shot 941219024:
RCUR=.6655 (try to get outer=1.7)

Dec 19 1994 02:54:55:330PM941219024John GoetzShot 9412190024:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.43
outer=1.75 inner=1.5 kappa=1.61

For Shot 941219025:
fire FSP

Dec 19 1994 03:11:16:660PM941219025John GoetzShot 9412190025:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.43
outer=1.75 inner=1.5 kappa=1.62

For Shot 941219026:
RXL=-.095 at end of ramp (to hold x-point more constant)

Dec 19 1994 03:27:01:170PM941219026John GoetzShot 9412190026:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.46
outer=1.8 inner=1.5 kappa=1.61

For Shot 941219027:
fire FSP

Dec 19 1994 03:41:54:540PM941219027John GoetzShot 9412190027:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.46
outer=1.8 inner=1.5 kappa=1.61
Prf=1.5MW

For Shot 941219028:
more RF power

Dec 19 1994 03:58:50:670PM941219028John GoetzShot 9412190028:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.45
outer=1.75 inner=1.5 kappa=1.61
Prf=1.75MW

For Shot 941219029:
ramp Ip to -850000
ramp NL_04 to 1.35e20
no RF power

Dec 19 1994 04:16:58:920PM941219029John GoetzShot 9412190029:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.33
outer=1.75 inner=1.5 kappa=1.61

For Shot 941219030:
NL_04=1.5e20 (no ramp) and hold gain on until 1.5sec

Dec 19 1994 04:34:14:010PM941219030John GoetzShot 941219030:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.3
outer=1.9 inner=1.5 kappa=1.63

For Shot 941219031:
NL_04=1.75e20 (no ramp)

Dec 19 1994 04:47:34:420PM941219031John GoetzShot 941219031:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.27
outer=1.9->2.1 inner=1.5->1.7 kappa=1.62->1.65

For Shot 941219032:
no changes

Dec 19 1994 05:03:54:080PM941219032John GoetzShot 941219032:
Plasma - disr. @ 1.28
outer=1.8->2.0 inner=1.5->1.7 kappa=1.61->1.65

Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
108:22:29:350AMTestOkoh coax test
208:36:23:650AMPlasmaOkno faults
308:49:31:440AMPlasmaOkno faults
409:12:13:970AMPlasmaOkno faults
509:29:07:000AMPlasmaOkdisruption induced comm faults oh2u and oh1
609:51:22:250AMPlasmaOkno faults
710:07:40:800AMPlasmaOkno faults
810:26:00:890AMPlasmaOkdisruption induced comm faults oh2l oh1
910:42:36:960AMPlasmaOkdisruption induced comm faults
1010:58:06:320AMPlasmaOkno faults
1111:16:59:540AMPlasmaOkno faults
1211:30:40:470AMPlasmaOkno faults
1311:45:10:750AMPlasmaOkno faults
1412:03:45:740PMPlasmaOkno faults
1512:19:26:900PMPlasmaOkdisruption induced comm faults- oh1 and oh2l
1612:36:38:030PMPlasmaBadef1l comm fault, then oh1 comm fault
1712:52:22:110PMPlasmaBadef4 fault 1 - d and e breaker pulled
1801:08:45:150PMPlasmaOkno faults
1901:22:09:620PMPlasmaBadef1l comm fault killed plasma
2001:35:46:690PMPlasmaOkno faults
2101:50:47:740PMPlasmaOkno faults
2202:07:25:060PMPlasmaOkno faults
2302:22:05:810PMPlasmaOkno faults
2402:40:16:010PMPlasmaOkno faults
2502:59:14:500PMPlasmaOkno faults
2603:15:19:130PMPlasmaOkno faults
2703:31:28:010PMPlasmaOkno faults
2803:48:29:180PMPlasmaOkno faults
2904:03:58:800PMPlasmaOkno faults
3004:20:35:840PMPlasmaOkno faults
3104:35:58:600PMPlasmaOkno faults
3204:52:40:960PMPlasmaOkno faults