Alcator C-Mod Run 941221 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:038
Date Filed: 2/22/1994
Title:Lithium Conditioning and Ohmic H Modes
First Author:Joseph Snipes
Session Leader:Vinny Bertolino (shots 1-32)

Operators
Session leader(s):Vinny Bertolino
Physics operator(s):Robert Granetz
Engineering operator(s):Vinny Bertolino

Engineering Operator Run Comment
ohmic H mode

Session Leader Plans

Physics Operators Plans

Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:11:727PM
Author: To Be Determined
Overall, it was a pretty good run. We achieved the goals of the
experiment which were to map out the density and to some extent the current
dependence of the H-mode threshold and compare with the addition of lithium
pellets. Ohmic H-modes occurred at 800 kA and 5.3 T for densities in the
range of 5.5 x 10^19 m^-2 and 8 x 10^19 m^-2. At higher densities,
H-modes were not found, apparently due to not enough power. The low
density limit seems to be pretty solid and may be due to increases in
molybdenum as the plasma edge gets hotter at the lower densities.

Ramping the current from 750 to 900 kA during the shot helped to
increase the length of some of the H-modes by increasing power while the
density increases during the H-mode. However, the density range up to 900 kA
was not significantly higher than at 800 kA, at least for ramping current.
Perhaps, at constant current of 900 kA, higher density H-modes could be
achieved. One shot with current ramping from 500 kA to 650 kA at low
density (5.5 x 10^19 m^-2) showed no evidence of an H-mode.

The addition of lithium pellets does not appear to affect the
H-mode threshold nor the H-mode quality at low, intermediate, or high density.
However, the density feedback did cause problems after the pellets since as
the density dropped below the pre-pellet value, the gas turned on hard and
these gas puffs increased the H alpha emission and may have prevented the
plasma from going into H-mode after the pellet. Marmar suggests increasing
the derivative gain on the feedback to try to prevent this problem. A run
should be devoted to tuning up the density feedback with pellets. Then,
the effects of lithium pellets on H-mode might be worth readdressing.

Except for problems on the first shot with EFC that caused several
blown fuses and an hour delay, the power supplies worked very well.

Shot,Duration(s),Ipmax(MA) Shot,Duration(s),Ipmax
1 0.250 0.579 2 0.419 0.864
3 1.471 0.838 4 0.967 0.830
5 1.469 0.833 6 1.469 0.835
7 1.468 0.833 8 1.484 0.833
9 1.478 0.830 10 1.130 0.835
11 1.470 0.835 12 1.054 0.864
13 0.983 0.897 14 0.000 0.024
15 1.064 0.864 16 1.090 0.835
17 1.088 0.825 18 1.070 0.840
19 1.099 0.835 20 0.000 0.026
21 1.429 0.913 22 1.413 0.915
23 1.086 0.913 24 1.433 0.910
25 1.418 0.915 26 1.425 0.835
27 1.225 0.830 28 1.453 0.675
29 1.430 0.828 30 0.000 0.047

Finished summary for 941221
Total of 30 shots. 27 plasmas. 3 fizzles. 0 duds.

Physics Operator Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:36:52:550PM
Author: To Be Determined
Physics operator's summary for Run 941221, MP 038?, "Ohmic H-modes"
SL: J. Snipes
PO: R. Granetz
EL: V. Bertolino

Goal: vary density and plasma current (0.6-0.9 MA) to further map out
ohmic H-mode thresholds. The reciprocating probe will also be firing, in
order to get profiles in the SOL. Towards the end of the run, we will also
inject lithium pellets.

This run succeeded at mapping out the density threshold for ohmic
H-modes at Ip=0.8 MA and 5.3 T. The result is nl=0.72-0.78 x 10**20
m-2, which results in a value of about 0.020 for the coefficient in
the standard ASDEX/DIII-D/JET scaling. The H-modes today were all
ELMy. A low density limit of nl=0.5-0.55 x 10**20 m-2 was also found
for Ip=0.5 to 0.8 MA. Also, lithium pellets do not seem to affect the
threshold for the L-H transition, at least not in a clean tokamak.
Further details of the physics results can be found in Joe's session
leader summary.

The only interesting new stuff today, from an operator's viewpoint, is
that running at low density (nl=0.5e20 m-2) resulted in many
disruptions around the time when the current rampdown began (approx
1.0 s), and running at higher densities did not result in these
disruptions. This is in spite of the fact that the magnetic
configuration was identical (i.e. the only changes to PCS had to do
with density feedback, and there were no detachments, or "sharkfins").
This problem has been plaguing us, and changes in configuration
programming don't seem to consistently solve the problem. Steve Horne
noted that the disruptions are occurring around the time when the
plasma becomes limited again on the inboard wall. Perhaps there is a
problem with a sudden influx of molybdenum at this time, which is
exacerbated at low densities because the SOL is hotter than at high
densities. We tried to overcome this on shots 027 (0.8 MA) and 028
(0.65 MA) by programming a 60 ms burst in density from t=0.94 to 1.00
s, the idea being that the resulting puff of gas would cool down the
edge and reduce impurity generation. This seemed to be successful,
and should be explored further. (Note: shot 027 eventually did
disrupt at 1.2 s, but this was due to the injection of a large lithium
pellet at that time.)

The blow-by-blow description follows:

Start with a shot comprised of segments 1 and 2 from 941219027, with mods
to RCUR (actually for larger outer gap), and density (start at nl=0.6e20 m-2).

Pre-fill at 1.4e-5 torr. ECDC in Helium was done for 2.5 hours prior to
this run.

Shot 001: Plasma, but EFC didn't go, so there were large vertical
oscillations, followed by a terminating disruption at t=0.25 s,
followed by crowbars on the TF and OH supplies.

(P.S. There were no hard x-rays.)

Next shot: repeat (hopefully with EFC).

Shot 002: Plasma, disrupted at 0.42 s because elongation got too high.

Next shot: change RCUR from 0.65 to 0.66 m, keeping CLEARIN the
same. This should reduce the elongation.

Shot 003: Plasma, nice shot. There was a 45 ms ELMy H-mode from 0.755 to
0.80. It may have been terminated by a moly injection. There
was a noticeable rise in the density during the H-mode.

Next shot: repeat, with argon enabled.

Shot 004: Plasma, disrupted at 0.97 s due to loss of vertical stability.
No H-modes.

Next shot: change RCUR again from 0.66 to 0.665 m, in order to
further reduce kappa.

Shot 005: Plasma, nice shot. H-mode from 0.85 to 1.0 s. Density was
at nl=0.6e20 m-2.

Next shot: increase density to nl=0.7e20 m-2. Looking for density
threshold for ohmic H-mode.

Shot 006: Plasma, nice shot. H-mode starts at 0.85 s.

Next shot: increase density to nl=0.8e20 m-2, and move the time
of gas turn-off earlier (from 0.85 s to 0.80 s.)

Shot 007: Plasma, nice shot. H-mode starts at 0.95 s, when the density
has decayed down to nl=0.72e20 m-2.

Next shot: repeat at same density, except put the time of density
turn-off back out to 0.85 s, in order keep the density from drooping
prior to H-mode.

Shot 008: Plasma, nice shot. H-mode starts at 1.0 s, when the density has
decayed to nl=0.72e20 m-2 again. That must be the threshold!

Next shot: increase density to 0.9e20 m-2.

Shot 009: Plasma, nice shot. No H-mode, although there is still some
dithering. So we've found the density threshold at Ip=0.8 MA.

Next shot: decrease the density back down to what we started
at on shot 003 (nl=0.6e20 m-2). This will begin a series of
shots in which the density will be lowered, in an attempt to
find a low density limit. We are repeating this density because
the scanning probe missed it last time (on shot 003).

Shot 010: Plasma, lots of big moly injections, terminated by a disruption at
1.13 s. No H-mode, no dithering. Don't know why.

Next shot: repeat.

Shot 011: Plasma, nice shot. H-mode starts at 0.75 s (same as on shot 003).
Wp increases by 20%. X-ray emission rises sharply during the
H-mode, and drops sharply at H-L transition. No moly injections...
maybe that's the difference between this shot and the previous one.

Next shot: lower density to nl=0.5e20 m-2.

Shot 012: Plasma. No H-mode or dithering. Terminated by a disruption
at 1.05 s. No moly injections. Reason for lack of H-mode: low
density limit? Reason for disruption: ?

Next shot: repeat, with a slight tweak on the early density
programming, but nl=0.5e20 m-2 still.

Shot 013: Plasma. No H-mode or dithering. Terminated by a disruption
at 0.98 s. No moly injections.

Next shot: raise density slightly from nl=0.5 to 0.55e20 m-2.

Shot 014: Fizzle. No obvious reason.

Next shot: repeat.

Shot 015: Plasma. No H-mode or dithering. Terminated by a disruption
at 1.06 s. There was a large molybdenum injection at 0.48 s.
Density feedback control leaves something to be desired.

Next shot: repeat one last time. Argon puff will NOT be enabled
on the next shot.

Shot 016: Plasma. Had H-mode this time! Terminated by a disruption
at 1.09 s. Noticeable density rise and x-ray rise during the
H-mode periods.

Next shot: lower the density back down to nl=0.5e20 m-2, and
keep the argon OFF.

Shot 017: Plasma. No H-mode or dithering. Terminated by a disruption
at 1.08 s. No moly injections.

Next shot: raise pre-fill to 1.6e-5 (from 1.4e-5 torr), and increase
gains of ZXL and ZXU from 2 to 4 after 1.0 s in order to try to
do something about these disruptions around 1 second.

Shot 018: Plasma. No H-mode or dithering. Terminated by a disruption
at 1.07 s. Big moly injection at around 0.6 s.

Next shot: raise density to nl=8.0e20 m-2.

Shot 019: Plasma. H-mode at 0.83 s, preceded by lots of dithering. Density
was nl=0.78e20 m-2 at the L-H transition which is close to the
result we found earlier in the run. There was also a large moly
injection at 0.91 s, which was probably due to the scanning probe.
The plasma still terminated in a disruption at 1.1 s.

Next shot: ramp plasma current from 0.75 MA at t=0.3 s up to
0.90 MA at t=1.0 s.

Shot 020: Fizzle.

Next shot: lower pre-fill back to 1.4e-5 torr and repeat.

Shot 021: Plasma, good shot. H-mode at 0.84 s, Ip=0.88 MA, nl=0.76e20 m-2.
Good Ip feedback control. No disruption.

Next shot: same current ramp, and raise density to nl=0.9e20 m-2.

Shot 022: Plasma, good shot. H-mode at 0.97 s, Ip=0.90 MA, nl=0.80e20 m-2.

Next shot: lower density to nl=0.7e20 m-2.

Shot 023: Plasma. H-mode starts at 0.63 s, Ip=0.84 MA, nl=0.71e20 m-2.
Terminated by a disruption at 1.08 s.

Next shot: raise density to nl=0.9e20 m-2, AND enable the lithium
pellet injector at 0.505 s.

Shot 024: Plasma, good shot. Lithium pellet did not seem to make any
difference to getting an H-mode at this density (compare to shot
941221022). The interferometer data was screwed up on this shot.

Next shot: repeat (to get the interferometer data), including lithium
pellet injection at 0.505 s.

Shot 025: Plasma, good shot. Again, lithium did not seem to make any
difference to getting an H-mode at this density (compare to shot
941221022). Interferometer data is okay on this shot.

Next shot: decrease density to nl=0.8e20 m-2, and program Ip to
be a constant 0.8 MA (i.e. no current rampup). The lithium pellet
at 0.505 s will be increased from medium to large size. There is
also a lithium pellet being injected at 1.2 s for Peter O'Shea to
study cold pulse propagation.

Shot 026: Plasma, good shot. Again, lithium did not seem to make any
difference to getting an H-mode at this density and current (compare
to 941221007).

Next shot: lower density to nl=0.55e20 m-2, and add a density puff
around 1 s to try and avoid the disruption. Lithium still being
injected.

Shot 027: Plasma. Again lithium did not make a difference at this low
density. There were several moly injections. Plasma terminated
in a disruption at 1.2 s, which may have been due to the second
lithium pellet.

Next shot: Low current rampup experiment...ramp Ip from 0.5 to
0.65 MA, at the same density (nl=0.55e20 m-2). No lithium
injection on this shot.

Shot 028: Plasma, nice shot. No H-mode. Low current does not help get
into H-mode at low density.

Next shot: Density at nl=0.7e20 m-2 (puff around 1 s is removed),
and current at a constant 0.8 MA. Lithium injection at 0.505 and
1.2 s.

Shot 029: Plasma, good shot. No H-mode with the lithium pellet injection,
even though the density (nl=0.7e20 m-2) and current (0.8 MA) are
within the parameter range where we previously had H-modes without
lithium injection (shot 941221006).

Next shot: repeat without lithium pellet injection.

Shot 030: Fizzle. Polychromator data indicates the protoplasma shot to
the outside, which means the current ramped up too fast. This
typically happens when the machine is very clean.

End of run.

Session Leader Comments
Dec 21 1994 08:53:58:950AM941221001Joseph SnipesThe purpose of this run is to map out the ohmic H-mode threshold in plasma
current and electron density space. The starting point was a combination of
shots 941130032 and 941219027, where we used the waveforms from the latter
slightly modified in segment 2 to more reflect the former.
Shot 1
EFC failed to chop causing early loss of control of the vertical position
and a disruption at 0.25 sec and many blown fuses on TF, OH2, and EFC power
supplies.

Dec 21 1994 09:45:43:200AM941221002Joseph SnipesShot 2
Power supplies worked, but the changes made in the RCUR apparently increased
the elongation too much and railed the EF2 supplies as well as EFC. The plasma
disrupted at 0.4 sec. So, for shot 3 we moved RCUR out to 0.66 m from 0.4 sec
to try to reduce the elongation.

Dec 21 1994 09:57:14:730AM941221003Joseph SnipesShot 3
Good plasma. Short H-mode from 0.75 to 0.8 sec

Dec 21 1994 10:15:17:650AM941221004Joseph SnipesShot 4
Violent disruption at 0.96 sec. It seems kappa is still too high. So, for
shot 5, we will move RCUR out another 5 mm to 0.665 m at 0.45 sec. Also, we
are having many Moly injections.

Dec 21 1994 10:30:16:180AM941221005Joseph SnipesShot 5
Good shot! H-mode from 0.85 - 1.0 sec and another short one to 1.1 sec.

Dec 21 1994 10:38:14:250AM941221006Joseph SnipesShot 6
Good shot! Density was set to 7 x 10^19 m^-2. H-mode from 0.85 - 1.05 sec.

Dec 21 1994 11:03:13:720AM941221007Joseph SnipesShot 7
Density set to 8 x 10^19 m^-2. Very short H-mode as the density comes down
at 0.95 sec to 1.05 sec.

Dec 21 1994 11:16:25:970AM941221008Joseph SnipesShot 8
Repeat keeping the density programming up to 0.85 sec. Good shot. Short
H-mode as the density comes down and passes 7.2 x 10^19 m^-2 from 0.97 sec
to 1.08 sec.

Dec 21 1994 11:40:54:950AM941221009Joseph SnipesShot 9
Good shot.
Raise density to 9 x 10^19 m^-2. Got some "dithering" from 0.9 to 1 sec.

Dec 21 1994 12:06:17:330PM941221010Joseph SnipesShot 10
Returning to 6 x 10^19 m^-2. Plasma, but no H-mode. Perhaps, the moly
injections made it too dirty to go into H-mode.

Dec 21 1994 12:07:10:700PM941221011Joseph SnipesShot 11
Repeat. Good shot! H-mode from 0.759 to 1 sec.

Dec 21 1994 12:25:30:670PM941221012Joseph SnipesShot 12
Density down to 5 x 10^19 m^-2. Disrupted at 1.05 sec. No H-mode

Dec 21 1994 12:36:19:280PM941221013Joseph SnipesShot 13
Good shot. No H-mode. May have reached the low density limit.

Dec 21 1994 12:37:38:730PM941221013Joseph SnipesShot 13
Good shot. No H-mode. Reached the low density limit.

Dec 21 1994 12:59:03:380PM941221014Joseph SnipesShot 14
Raising the density to 5.5 x 10^19 m^-2.
Fizzle!

Dec 21 1994 01:05:34:040PM941221015Joseph SnipesShot 15
Good shot. No H-mode.

Dec 21 1994 01:41:13:140PM941221016Joseph SnipesShot 16
Repeat with no Argon puff. Short H-mode from 0.67 to 0.68 sec and from
0.76 to 0.83 sec.

Dec 21 1994 01:43:49:330PM941221017Joseph SnipesShot 17
Good shot but with some hard x rays. No H-mode.

Dec 21 1994 01:44:52:320PM941221018Joseph SnipesShot 18
Good shot but with some hard x rays and moly injections. No H-mode.

Dec 21 1994 02:09:23:250PM941221019Joseph SnipesShot 19
Raising the density to 8 x 10^19 m^-2 to recheck upper density limit for this
current. Good shot. Disrupted late at 1.1 sec. H-mode from 0.83 to 0.91 sec.
Looks like the fast scanning probe injected moly into the plasma at 0.91 sec.

Dec 21 1994 02:24:59:430PM941221020Joseph SnipesShot 20
Ramping the plasma current from 750 to 900 ka from 0.4 sec to 1 sec.
Fizzle!

Dec 21 1994 02:36:01:990PM941221021Joseph SnipesShot 21
Ramping the plasma current from 750 to 900 ka from 0.4 sec to 1 sec.
Good shot. H-mode from 0.84 to 1.1 sec. Dithering between 0.56 and 0.83 sec.

Dec 21 1994 03:04:27:240PM941221022Joseph SnipesShot 22
Another current ramp shot with higher density at 9 x 10^19 m^-2.
H-mode from 0.97 to 1.05 sec.

Dec 21 1994 03:05:39:360PM941221023Joseph SnipesShot 23
H-mode from 0.6 2 to 0.88 sec.

Dec 21 1994 03:06:14:910PM941221023Joseph SnipesShot 23
Density set to 7 x 10^19 m^-2.
H-mode from 0.6 2 to 0.88 sec.

Dec 21 1994 03:24:03:800PM941221024Joseph SnipesShot 24
Density set to 9 x 10^19 m^-2. Medium sized lithium pellet at 0.5 sec.
Good shot! No density measurements. Dithering from 0.77 to 1.05 sec.
Very short H-mode from 1.06 to 1.08 sec.

Dec 21 1994 03:46:21:550PM941221025Joseph SnipesShot 25
Density set to 9 x 10^19 m^-2. Medium sized lithium pellet at 0.5 sec and
a small Li pellet at 1.2 sec.
Good shot! Dithering from 0.72 to 0.96 sec. H-mode from 0.97 to 1.07 sec.

Dec 21 1994 04:01:10:930PM941221026Joseph SnipesShot 26
Density set to 8 x 10^19 m^-2. Big sized lithium pellet at 0.5 sec and
a big Li pellet at 1.2 sec.
Good shot! Dithering from 0.75 to 0.89 sec. H-mode from 0.89 to 1.07 sec.

Dec 21 1994 04:12:00:720PM941221027Joseph SnipesShot 27
Density set to 5.5 x 10^19 m^-2. Medium sized lithium pellet at 0.5 sec and
a big Li pellet at 1.2 sec. Disrupted at second pellet. No H-mode.

Dec 21 1994 04:26:38:770PM941221028Joseph SnipesShot 28
Trying to get low power H-mode at 5.5 x 10^19 m^-2 with a current ramp from
0.5 to 0.65 MA from 0.17 sec to 1 sec. Good shot! No H-mode.

Dec 21 1994 04:46:57:000PM941221028Joseph SnipesShot 29
Returning to 800 kA flattop at 7 x 10^19 m^-2. Big Li pellets at 0.5 sec
and 1.2 sec. No H-mode.

Dec 21 1994 05:01:28:610PM941221030Joseph SnipesShot 30
Repeat without Li pellet at 0.5 sec but with a small pellet at 1.2 sec.
Fizzle!

Dec 21 1994 05:13:24:910PM941221030Joseph SnipesOverall, it was a pretty good run. We achieved the goals of the experiment
which were to map out the density and to some extent the current dependence
of the H-mode threshold and compare with the addition of lithium pellets.
Ohmic H-modes occurred at 800 kA and 5.3 T for densities in the range of
5.5 x 10^19 m^-2 and 7.8 x 10^19 m^-2. At higher densities, H-modes were
not found, apparently due to not enough power. The low density limit seems
to be pretty solid and may be due to increases in molybdenum as the plasma
edge gets hotter at the lower densities.

Dec 21 1994 05:18:19:820PM941221030Joseph SnipesThe addition of lithium pellets does not appear to affect the H-mode threshold
nor the H-mode quality at low, intermediate, or high density. However, the
density feedback did cause problems after the pellets since as the density
dropped below the pre-pellet value, the gas turned on hard and these gas puffs
increased the H alpha emission and may have prevented the plasma from going
into H-mode after the pellet. Marmar suggests increasing the derivative gain
on the feedback to try to prevent this problem.

Physics Operator Comments
Dec 21 1994 08:27:41:180AMRobert GranetzPhysics operator's summary for Run 941221, MP 038?, "Ohmic H-modes"
SL: J. Snipes
PO: R. Granetz
EL: V. Bertolino

Goal: vary density and plasma current (0.6-0.9 MA) to further map out
ohmic H-mode thresholds. The reciprocating probe will also be firing, in
order to get profiles in the SOL. Towards the end of the run, we may also
inject lithium pellets.

Start with a shot comprised of segments 1 and 2 from 941219027, with mods
to RCUR (actually for larger outer gap), and density (start at nl=0.6e20 m-2).

Pre-fill at 1.4e-5 torr. ECDC in Helium was done for 2.5 hours prior to
this run.

Dec 21 1994 08:48:33:560AM941221001Robert GranetzShot 001: Plasma, but EFC didn't go, so there were large vertical
oscillations, followed by a terminating disruption at t=0.25 s,
followed by crowbars on the TF and OH supplies.

(P.S. There were no hard x-rays.)

Next shot: repeat (hopefully with EFC)

Dec 21 1994 09:45:00:850AM941221002Robert GranetzShot 002: Plasma, disrupted at 0.42 s because elongation got too high.

Next shot: change RCUR from 0.65 to 0.66 m, keeping CLEARIN the
same. This should reduce the elongation.

Dec 21 1994 09:57:57:190AM941221003Robert GranetzShot 003: Plasma, nice shot. There was a 45 ms ELMy H-mode from 0.755 to
0.80. It may have been terminated by a moly injection. There
was a noticeable rise in the density during the H-mode.

Next shot: repeat, with argon enabled.

Dec 21 1994 10:15:12:470AM941221004Robert GranetzShot 004: Plasma, disrupted at 0.97 s due to loss of vertical stability.
No H-modes.

Next shot: change RCUR again from 0.66 to 0.665 m, in order to
further reduce kappa.

Dec 21 1994 10:27:29:270AM941221005Robert GranetzShot 005: Plasma, nice shot. H-mode from 0.85 to 1.0 s. Density was
at nl=0.6e20 m-2.

Next shot: increase density to nl=0.7e20 m-2. Looking for density
threshold for ohmic H-mode.

Dec 21 1994 10:38:44:830AM941221006Robert GranetzShot 006: Plasma, nice shot. H-mode starts at 0.85 s.

Next shot: increase density to nl=0.8e20 m-2.

Dec 21 1994 10:56:47:830AM941221007Robert GranetzShot 007: Plasma, nice shot. H-mode starts at 0.95 s, when the density
has decayed down to nl=0.72e20 m-2.

Next shot: repeat at same density, except put the time of density
turn-off back out to 0.85 s, in order keep the density from drooping
prior to H-mode.

Dec 21 1994 11:14:06:420AM941221008Robert GranetzShot 008: Plasma, nice shot. H-mode starts at 1.0 s, when the density has
decayed to nl=0.72e20 m-2 again. That must be the threshold!

Next shot: increase density to 0.9e20 m-2.

Dec 21 1994 11:37:13:560AM941221009Robert GranetzShot 009: Plasma, nice shot. No H-mode, although there is still some
dithering. So we've found the density threshold at Ip=0.8 MA.

Next shot: decrease the density back down to what we started
at on shot 003 (nl=0.6e20 m-2). This will begin a series of
shots in which the density will be lowered, in an attempt to
find a low density limit. We are repeating this density because
the scanning probe missed it last time (on shot 003).

Dec 21 1994 11:53:09:310AM941221010Robert GranetzShot 010: Plasma, lots of big moly injections, terminated by a disruption at
1.13 s. No H-mode, no dithering. Don't know why.

Next shot: repeat.

Dec 21 1994 12:06:44:530PM941221011Robert GranetzShot 011: Plasma, nice shot. H-mode starts at 0.75 s (same as on shot 003).
Wp increases by 20%. X-ray emission rises sharply during the
H-mode, and drops sharply at H-L transition.

Next shot: lower density to nl=0.5e20 m-2.

Dec 21 1994 12:23:29:940PM941221012Robert GranetzShot 012: Plasma. No H-mode or dithering. Terminated by a disruption
at 1.05 s. No moly injections. Reason for lack of H-mode: low
density limit? Reason for disruption: ?

Next shot: repeat, with a slight tweak on the early density
programming, but nl=0.5e20 m-2 still.

Dec 21 1994 12:37:12:210PM941221013Robert GranetzShot 013: Plasma. No H-mode or dithering. Terminated by a disruption
at 0.98 s. No moly injections.

Next shot: raise density slightly from nl=0.5 to 0.55e20 m-2.

Dec 21 1994 12:44:00:900PM941221014Robert GranetzShot 014: Fizzle. No obvious reason.

Next shot: repeat.

Dec 21 1994 01:01:29:290PM941221015Robert GranetzShot 015: Plasma. No H-mode or dithering. Terminated by a disruption
at 1.06 s. There was a large molybdenum injection at 0.48 s.
Density feedback control leaves something to be desired.

Next shot: repeat one last time.

Dec 21 1994 01:06:49:090PM941221015Robert GranetzArgon puff will NOT be enabled on the next shot.

Dec 21 1994 01:21:19:270PM941221016Robert GranetzShot 016: Plasma. Had H-mode this time! Terminated by a disruption
at 1.09 s. Noticeable density rise and x-ray rise during the
H-mode periods.

Next shot: lower the density back down to nl=0.5e20 m-2, and
keep the argon OFF.

Dec 21 1994 01:38:15:150PM941221017Robert GranetzShot 017: Plasma. No H-mode or dithering. Terminated by a disruption
at 1.08 s. No moly injections.

Next shot: raise pre-fill to 1.6e-5 (from 1.4e-5 torr), and increase
gains of ZXL and ZXU from 2 to 4 after 1.0 s in order to try to
do something about these disruptions around 1 second.

Dec 21 1994 01:47:37:810PM941221018Robert GranetzShot 018: Plasma. No H-mode or dithering. Terminated by a disruption
at 1.07 s. Big moly injection at around 0.6 s.

Next shot: raise density to nl=8.0e20 m-2.

Dec 21 1994 02:10:40:490PM941221019Robert GranetzShot 019: Plasma. H-mode at 0.83 s, preceded by lots of dithering. Density
was nl=0.78e20 m-2 at the L-H transition which is close to the
result we found earlier in the run. There was also a large moly
injection at 0.91 s, which was probably due to the scanning probe.
The plasma still terminated in a disruption at 1.1 s.

Next shot: ramp plasma current from 0.75 MA at t=0.3 s up to
0.90 MA at t=1.0 s.

Dec 21 1994 02:16:05:590PM941221020Robert GranetzShot 020: Fizzle.

Next shot: lower pre-fill back to 1.4e-5 torr and repeat.

Dec 21 1994 02:37:00:110PM941221021Robert GranetzShot 021: Plasma, good shot. H-mode at 0.84 s, Ip=0.88 MA, nl=0.76e20 m-2.
Good Ip feedback control. No disruption.

Next shot: same current ramp, and raise density to nl=0.9e20 m-2.

Dec 21 1994 02:48:41:740PM941221022Robert GranetzShot 022: Plasma, good shot. H-mode at 0.97 s, Ip=0.90 MA, nl=0.80e20 m-2.

Next shot: lower density to nl=0.7e20 m-2.

Dec 21 1994 03:03:48:730PM941221023Robert GranetzShot 023: Plasma. H-mode starts at 0.63 s, Ip=0.84 MA, nl=0.71e20 m-2.
Terminated by a disruption at 1.08 s.

Next shot: raise density to nl=0.9e20 m-2, AND enable the lithium
pellet injector at 0.505 s.

Dec 21 1994 03:22:27:870PM941221024Robert GranetzShot 024: Plasma, good shot. Lithium pellet did not seem to make any
difference to getting an H-mode at this density (compare to shot
941221022). The interferometer data was screwed up on this shot.

Next shot: repeat (to get the interferometer data), including lithium
pellet injection at 0.505 s.

Dec 21 1994 03:40:38:320PM941221025Robert GranetzShot 025: Plasma, good shot. Again, lithium did not seem to make any
difference to getting an H-mode at this density (compare to shot
941221022). Interferometer data is okay on this shot.

Next shot: decrease density to nl=0.8e20 m-2, and program Ip to
be a constant 0.8 MA (i.e. no current rampup). The lithium pellet
at 0.505 s will be increased from medium to large size. There is
also a lithium pellet being injected at 1.2 s for Peter O'Shea to
study cold pulse propagation.

Dec 21 1994 03:59:25:240PM941221026Robert GranetzShot 026: Plasma, good shot. Again, lithium did not seem to make any
difference to getting an H-mode at this density and current (compare
to 941221007).

Next shot: lower density to nl=0.55e20 m-2, and add a density puff
around 1 s to try and avoid the disruption. Lithium still being
injected.

Dec 21 1994 04:12:14:220PM941221027Robert GranetzShot 027: Plasma. Again lithium did not make a difference at this low
density. There were several moly injections. Plasma terminated
in a disruption at 1.2 s, which may have been due to the second
lithium pellet.

Next shot: Low current rampup experiment...ramp Ip from 0.5 to
0.65 MA, at the same density (nl=0.55e20 m-2). No lithium
injection on this shot.

Dec 21 1994 04:28:09:930PM941221028Robert GranetzShot 028: Plasma, nice shot. No H-mode. Current rampup does not help get
into H-mode at low density.

Next shot: Density at nl=0.7e20 m-2 (puff around 1 s is removed),
and current at a constant 0.8 MA. Lithium injection at 0.505 and
1.2 s.

Dec 21 1994 04:46:02:790PM941221029Robert GranetzShot 029: Plasma, good shot. No H-mode with the lithium pellet injection,
even though the density (nl=0.7e20 m-2) and current (0.8 MA) are
within the parameter range where we previously had H-modes without
lithium injection (shot 941221006).

Next shot: repeat without lithium pellet injection.

Dec 21 1994 04:53:56:070PM941221030Robert GranetzShot 030: Fizzle. Don't know why

End of run.

Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
108:33:46:620AMPlasmaBadchopper IOC, disruption, oh2u comm fault, tf IOC: in that order!
209:27:30:180AMPlasmaOkno faults
309:45:24:840AMPlasmaOkno faults
409:57:20:940AMPlasmaOkno faults
510:16:12:760AMPlasmaOkno faults
610:30:27:580AMPlasmaOkno faults
710:48:10:180AMPlasmaOkNo faults
811:04:55:530AMPlasmaOkNo faults
911:22:18:400AMPlasmaOkNo faults.
1011:40:53:170AMPlasmaOkNo Faults.
1111:53:33:410AMPlasmaOkNo Faults
1212:09:39:480PMPlasmaOkNo faults.
1312:23:06:860PMPlasmaOkNo faults.
1412:38:36:780PMPlasmaOkNo Faults.
1512:51:18:770PMPlasmaOkno faults
1601:07:53:010PMPlasmaOkNo Faults.
1701:23:25:100PMPlasmaOkNo Faults
1801:38:10:230PMPlasmaOkNO faults
1901:51:47:390PMPlasmaOkNo Faults
2002:12:56:220PMPlasmaOkNo Faults.
2102:23:22:530PMPlasmaOkComm fault OH2 L
2202:39:45:370PMPlasmaOkno faults
2302:51:54:170PMPlasmaOkno faults
2403:07:32:090PMPlasmaOkno faults
2503:22:24:330PMPlasmaOkoh2u comm fault after disruption
2603:41:06:910PMPlasmaOkno faults
2703:58:58:120PMPlasmaOkno faults
2804:14:52:540PMPlasmaOkno faults
2904:30:39:950PMPlasmaOkoh1, oh2l comm faults after disruption
3004:48:06:130PMPlasmaOkno faults
3105:32:06:660PMTestOkData system test
3205:44:49:900PMTestOkData system test