Alcator C-Mod Run 950308 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:
Date Filed:
Title:
First Author:
Session Leader:Brian Labombard (shots 1-42)

Operators
Session leader(s):Brian Labombard
Physics operator(s):Robert Granetz
Engineering operator(s):Vinny Bertolino,Joe Daigle

Engineering Operator Run Comment
granetz/labombard

Session Leader Plans

Physics Operators Plans

Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:12:507PM
Author: To Be Determined
Session Leader's summary of run 950308

MP# 084 Scrape_off Layer Characterization II

Physics Operator: Granetz
Session Leader: LaBombard
Engineering Operator: Bertolino/Daigle

The goal of this run was to study the scaling of scrape-off layer conditions
in single null diverted plasmas with plasma currents of 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 MA.

*** The run plan was:

5.3 Tesla deuterium plasmas, no impurity gas injection, no special wall preconditioning

(0) - start programming with 950228006 which is an 0.8 MA shot with very good constant
strike point programming (probe 2 on outer divertor), very good scanning probe targeting,
and good gaps.
Five key equilibrium shape parameters need to be watched during this run:
inner gap > 1.5 cm, outer gap > 1.5 cm, distance to second separatrix (SSEP on EFIT scope)
> 1.7 cm, constant outer divertor strike point location, and constant scanning probe target
flux surface location.

(1) - tune up a density ramp from NL_04 = 0.5e20 at 0.5 sec to 1.0e20 at 1 sec. Fire the
scanning probe at 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 sec. (3 shots)

(2) - density ramp from NL_04 = 0.8e20 at 0.5 sec to 1.5e20 at 1 sec, fire probe (3 shots)

(2a) - optional at 1.0 MA: density ramp from NL_04 = 1.0e20 at 0.5 sec to 2.0e20 at 1 sec,
fire probe (3 shots)

- repeat steps (1) and (2) for plasma currents of 0.6, 0.4, and 1.0 MA.

(3) - for last 2 shots, return to 0.8 MA with density ramp NL_04 = 0.5e20 at 0.5 sec to
1.0e20 at 1 sec, fire probe

*** The actual run was:

We were successful in setting up the 0.8 MA and 1.0 MA plasmas with the three (or more)
density ramps as stated in steps (2), (2a) and (3) above. A bit more time was taken than
originally planned at the 1.0 MA level. This was partly due to the disruption-fizzle mode of operation
that we had to live with and partly due to the need to optimize the data from the fast-scanning probe.
It appears that the probe could not be inserted to the LCFS without over-currenting the bias
power supplies (2 amps per probe at -200 volts). We had to settle for 2-3 mm outside the
LCFS as the deepest penetration.
The 1.0 MA plasmas came at a cost: we managed to get 3 disruption 'strikes' exceeding 200kA
of halo current. Fortunately, the three strikes and you're out rule does not apply to tokamak
disruptions, even though they are a violent offense.
By 3:00 P.M. we were ready to attack the low current (0.4, 0.6 MA) part of the
miniproposal. Due to limited time, we decided to focus on 0.4 MA in order to get the widest
range in current. These plasmas were not to be. They typically disrupted early. Apparently they
were vertically unstable despite attempts by Bob (with some help from the wire-heads at large)
to adjust feedback gain on ZCUR. In the end we gave up on 0.4 MA thinking that 0.6 MA would be
easier (more stable). Still, the 0.6 MA plasmas behaved the same way. This is puzzling since
we were successful on 02-FEB-1995 to get some nice 0.5 MA plasmas. Bob's statement was
something like "looks like we need some more discharge development in order to do these plasmas".
I agree. The remainder of this miniproposal could be tougher to complete than the first part.

I would declare the first part of the miniproposal (diverted part) half done. Although
the point of it really was to perform a complete current scan ON THE SAME RUN DAY in order to
eliminate any systematic variations between runs (probe area changes, EFIT reconstruction
changes, other). However, given that this run is the backup for when the RF is not ready,
we may still have a chance to do a the full current scan in a single day.

See the phys_op_summary for a complete shot-by-shot commentary. Also entries were made
in the logbook under the physics operator and session leader topics.

Physics Operator Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:36:53:473PM
Author: To Be Determined
Physics operator's summary for run 950308.

SL: B. Labombard
PO: R. Granetz
EO: V. Bertolino

Today's run is devoted to MP #084, Scrape-off Layer Characterization II)
This was first attempted a week ago (950228), but was prematurely cancelled
due to disk quota problems. The run basically requires a well-diverted
plasma, into which Brian fires the scanning probe assembly three times
during the shot. Parameters to be scanned are density (ramped during the
shot) and plasma current. The goal is to get data at 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and
1.0 MA.

Machine operation today was typical. At 0.8 and 1.0 MA we managed to get
plenty of good probe data. We eventually had numerous shots at these
currents that were disruption free, although it was a struggle. Nearly all
of the disruptions were due to loss of vertical control, and the reasons
for this are not obvious...kappa was not excessive. Most of the
1.0 MA disruptions were followed by a fizzle.

However, operation at 0.4 and 0.6 MA was not satisfactory. First of all,
the finely tuned plasma shape (x-point locations, strike points, etc) that
we had setup at the higher currents did not carry over to the lower currents.
I conclude that our so-called `orthogonal' controllers (and probably also
our estimators) are not very othogonal to plasma current. Secondly, the
plasma was even less vertically stable, and we didn't manage to get any
shot that made it to the end of flattop at these lower currents, although
lots of tweaks to slow and fast ZCUR PD gains were made. Very little useful
probe data was obtained at the low currents.

Detailed shot log follows:

Shot 001 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.135 s during rampdown, due to VDE. Lots
of moly injections. A few bits of hard x-rays. Gaps look
good, SSEP is marginal (1.5 cm). Multiple PF faults after the
shot ended.
Next shot: correct RCUR by entering offset of 8000 and adding 1 cm
to demand waveform. Also increase early gas puff.

Shot 002 - Dud. EF2U upper didn't switch on, due to operator error (mine!).
Next shot: import segment 01 from yesterday's run, and reset all
switch times to yesterday's as well. Increase ZXU by 0.5 cm in
order to increase SSEP from 1.5 to 2.0

Shot 003 - Runaway shot.
Next shot: adjust pre-fill from 2.0 to 2.4e-5 torr.

Shot 004 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.12 s during rampdown, due to a VDE. No
hard x-rays. Density had a lot of wobbles on it.
Next shot: lower proportional gain on density feedback. Also
lower the proportional gain on fast ZCUR after 1.0 s. Density
program was also changed slightly, in order to accomodate probe
firing times.

Shot 005 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.07 s, due to VDE. There were a few hard
x-rays. Density still had wobbles.
Next shot: lower derivative gain on fast ZCUR after 1 sec, and
also turn down proportional gain on density again. Also raise
pre-fill from 2.4 to 2.5e-5 torr.

Shot 006 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.06 s, VDE. Density wobbles are gone.
Next shot: tweak ZXL programming to try and keep the probe target
point fixed better (it's varying by 2 mm). Also reduce proportional
gain on slow ZCUR after 1 s.

Shot 007 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.06 s, VDE. Density did not reach the
requested maximum.
Next shot: tweak up the max demand density. Return all fast and
slow ZCUR gains (P's and D's) to the settings at the beginning
of today's run. Change CLEARIN to push the plasma against the
inner wall shortly after 1 s.

Shot 008 - Fizzle.
Next shot: reduce pre-fill from 2.5 to 2.4e-5 torr.

Shot 009 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.10 s. Density was okay, but there were some
hard x-rays.
Next shot: tweak ZXU to keep SSEP more constant. Increase range
of density ramp. Set it for nl_04=0.8e20 at 0.55 s, and
1.6e20 at 1.0 s. Also increase early gas puffing a little.

Shot 010 - Fizzle.
Next shot: on Earl's advice, lower OH1 voltage by 20 volts between
t=5 to 15 ms.

Shot 011 - Plasma, made it to 1.35 s before disrupting. Density makes it
only to 1.3e20 m-2.
Next shot: Change density pre-programmed voltage to better match
what we got.

Shot 012 - Plasma, made it to 1.35 s again before disrupting. Density ramp
was pretty good.
Next shot: move CLEARIN even further in after 1.3 s. Tweak ZXL
at bit to keep probe target point fixed better, and also increase
the density ramp: nl_04=1.0e20 at 0.55 s and 2.0e20 at 1.0 s

Shot 013 - Plasma, disrupted upward at 0.97 s. Density made it to 1.7e20 m-2.
This ends the probe dataset at 0.8 MA.
Next shot: raise plasma current to 1.0 MA and return density ramp
to lower values (copy nl_04 programming from shot 009)

Shot 014 - Plasma, bad VDE disruption at 0.58 s, with Ihalo_l=236 kA.
Kappa=1.66.
Next shot: lower proportional gain on fast ZCUR after 0.35 s.

Shot 015 - Fizzle.
Next shot: try again.

Shot 016 - Plasma, VDE disruption upwards at 0.56 s.
Next shot: half the slow ZCUR proportional gain, and return the
fast ZCUR gain to its earlier value.

Shot 017 - Dud. Caused by multiple power supply misbehavior.
Next shot: try again

Shot 018 - Fizzle. Way too much vertical field. No reason why.
Next shot: try again

Shot 019 - Plasma, disrupted downwards at 0.71 s with Ihalo_l=245 kA.
Next shot: tweak fast ZCUR gain down. Raised EF4 to account
for higher plasma current.

Shot 020 - Fizzle.
Next shot: load in higher density ramp, and the corresponding
pre-programmed voltage.

Shot 021 - Plasma. Nice shot (finally!).
Next shot: repeat.

Shot 022 - Plasma, but it terminates at 0.30 s due to a fault in EF1L at 0.2 s.
Next shot: repeat.

Shot 023 - Plasma. No disruption. Some hard x-rays. Some of Brian's scanning
probes had problems.
Next shot: increase early gas puff and repeat

Shot 024 - Plasma, nice shot. Brian's going to change the scanning probe
position by a few mm again on next shot.
Next shot: repeat

Shot 025 - Plasma, disrupted at 0.62 s. VDE, but there's a huge injection
of something at 0.59 s.
Next shot: repeat

Shot 026 - Fizzle.
Next shot: repeat

Shot 027 - Plasma, nice shot. Scanning probe data looks good.
Next shot: higher density; set ramp to go from 1.0e20 at 0.55 s to
2.0e20 at 1.0 s

Shot 028 - Plasma, nice shot. Density made it to 1.8e20 m-2.
Next shot: increase plenum pressure by about 20% and repeat.

Shot 029 - Plasma, nice shot. Magnetics Traq_2 failed. Because of that, we
have to repeat this shot.
Next shot: repeat

Shot 030 - Plasma, nice shot. Really good repeat.
Next shot: lower density; set ramp to go from 0.5e20 at 0.55 s to
1.0e20 at 1.0 s.

Shot 031 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.05 s. Scanning probe was pulled back for
safety purposes.
Next shot: repeat (probably will be a fizzle though)

Shot 032 - Fizzle.
Next shot: try again, one last time at this 1 MA level.

Shot 033 - Plasma, disrupted at 0.64 s, with Ihalo_l=216 kA. Got scanning
probe data at the lowest density, which is what we were really after
Next shot: Change plasma current to only 0.4 MA. Adjust EF4
accordingly. Note that this will probably be a fizzle anyway.

Shot 034 - Fizzle.
Next shot: try again.

Shot 035 - Plasma, 0.4 MA, disrupts upward at 0.98 s. There's a very large
and very fast increase in density at 0.86 s, which is probably
a detachment. The lower x-point rides up very far onto the
inner divertor. So much for our othogonal controllers and
estimators.
Next shot: Move RXL out by 1.5 cm and ZXL down by 1.5 cm.

Shot 036 - Plasma, but disrupted at only 0.30 s. Kappa=1.59.
Next shot: move plasma down by 0.5 cm to reduce kappa.

Shot 037 - Plasma, disrupted upward at 0.85 s. Magnetics traq_2 failed again.
Disruption happened at the same time as the density burst on
shot 035.
Next shot: lower the density ramp; 0.4e20 at 0.55 s to 0.8e20 at
1.0 s

Shot 038 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.33 s.
Next shot: minor changes to lower x-point programming time.

Shot 039 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.30 s due to VDE.
Give up on 0.4 MA.
Next shot: raise Ip to 0.6 MA, adjust EF4 accordingly, and return
density ramp to 0.5-1.0e20 m-2.

Shot 040 - Plasma, 0.6 MA, disrupted early at 0.42 s. Weird stuff on 2pi bolo
and x-rays starting at 0.3 s. Plasma is momentarily upper x-point.
Next shot: lower slow ZCUR P and D gains from 1.5 to 1.0.

Shot 041 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.41 s. There was a big impurity
injection at 0.39 s.
Next shot: return slow ZCUR P and D gains to 1.5, and boost up
the fast ZCUR derivative gain from 6 to 9.

Shot 042 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.42 s. Can't seem to overcome
the vertical instability problems at low plasma currents.

End of run.

Session Leader Comments
Mar 8 1995 08:46:55:700AM950308001Brian LabombardShot: 1
No FSP. 0.8 MA plasma. Gaps look good ~ 2 cm. SSEP is 1.5 cm.
Strike points looks good. Density ramp from 0.5e20 @ .5 sec
to 1.0e20 at 1 sec - some wiggles though.

Mar 8 1995 08:50:13:710AM950308002Brian LabombardShot: 2
FSP firing at .5, .75 and 1.0 sec. Rest position 5 mm.
No EF2 upper.

Mar 8 1995 09:03:00:790AM950308003Brian LabombardShot: 3
FSP firing at .6, .8 and 1.0 sec. Rest position 5 mm.
very ulgy. disruption at 0.38 sec.

Mar 8 1995 09:18:20:770AM950308004Brian LabombardShot: 4
FSP firing at .6, .8 and 1.0 sec. Rest position 5 mm.
Plasma. Still wobble on density. Made it to 2 mm outside LCFS.

Mar 8 1995 09:33:33:130AM950308005Brian LabombardShot: 5
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 7 mm.
samples densities: .45, .77, .92 e10
First scan is 3 mm out. Second and third scans make it to LCFS

Mar 8 1995 09:42:44:460AM950308006Brian LabombardShot: 6
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 7 mm.
samples densities: .5, .69, .88 e20
First scan is 2 mm outside, last two are at LCFS.

Mar 8 1995 09:52:46:190AM950308007Brian LabombardShot: 7
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 7 mm.
samples densities: .47, .63, .76e20
2 mm outside on all three scans.

Mar 8 1995 09:59:48:660AM950308008Brian LabombardShot: 8
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 9 mm.
No plasma

Mar 8 1995 10:15:05:120AM950308009Brian LabombardShot: 9
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 9 mm.
samples densities: .47, .7, .92e20
First two scans make it to LCFS, last scan is 1mm inside.
SSEP ramps down from 1.8 @ .6 sec to .12 @ 1. sec
Try to fix this on next shot.

Mar 8 1995 10:29:43:040AM950308010Brian LabombardShot: 10
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 9 mm.
no plasma

Mar 8 1995 10:48:50:040AM950308011Brian LabombardShot: 11
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 9 mm.
samples denmsities: .8, 1., 1.3 e20
all three scans make it to LCFS.
Moly injection at .48 sec.

Mar 8 1995 11:13:56:470AM950308012Brian LabombardShot: 12
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 9 mm.
samples denmsities: .86, 11., 1.5 e20
first two scans make it to LCFS. third scan is 3 mm out.

Mar 8 1995 11:18:08:770AM950308013Brian LabombardShot: 13
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 9 mm.
samples denmsities: 1.0, 1.35., 1.7 e20
All three scans make it to LCFS

Mar 8 1995 11:31:54:130AM950308014Brian LabombardShot: 14
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 0 mm.
This is a 1 MA shot. Disrupted just before first scan.

Mar 8 1995 11:36:58:910AM950308015Brian LabombardShot: 15
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position -5 mm.
fizzle.

Mar 8 1995 11:48:00:170AM950308016Brian LabombardShot: 16
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position -5 mm.
1MA disruption before first scan.

Mar 8 1995 11:58:50:600AM950308017Brian LabombardShot: 17
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position -5 mm.
Dud.

Mar 8 1995 12:07:57:610PM950308018Brian LabombardShot: 18
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position -5 mm.
Fizzle.

Mar 8 1995 12:37:03:120PM950308020Brian LabombardShot: 20
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position -5 mm.
Guess what - fizzle!

Mar 8 1995 12:53:17:760PM950308022Brian LabombardShot: 22
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position +5 mm.
Disrupted at .3 sec.

Mar 8 1995 01:13:44:160PM950308023Brian LabombardShot: 23
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 6 mm.
Sampled densities: .9, 1.2, 1.4 e20
second scan is overinserted by 1 mm. Other two scans
are at LCFS.

Mar 8 1995 01:38:20:610PM950308025Brian LabombardShot: 25
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 3 mm.
diruption at .625 sec, just after first scan.

Mar 8 1995 01:41:51:260PM950308026Brian LabombardShot: 26
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 3 mm.
Fizzle.

Mar 8 1995 02:03:59:970PM950308027Brian LabombardShot: 27
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 3 mm.
samples densities: .88, 1.17, 1.4 e20
data looks the best so far. 3mm, 1mm, and 3mm outside LCFS

Mar 8 1995 02:18:49:890PM950308028Brian LabombardShot: 28
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 3 mm.
samples densities: 1.28, 1.4, 1.7 e20
FSP data looks good. 2 mm outside LCFS.

Mar 8 1995 02:30:56:030PM950308029Brian LabombardShot: 29
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 3 mm.
samples densities: 1.2, 1.53, 2.0 e20
FSP data looks good. FSP position=???.
Traq digitizers crapped out on this shot. For EFIT to run, it will
have to use a different coil set. Since this could change the
estimate of the LCFS target for the scanning probe, we would rather
repeat the shot and use the same coil set.

Mar 8 1995 02:42:34:300PM950308030Brian LabombardShot: 30
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 4.5 mm.
samples densities: 1.2, 1.5, 2.0 e20
FSP data looks good. 3 mm, 1mm, 3mm outisde.

Mar 8 1995 02:56:59:740PM950308031Brian LabombardShot: 31
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position -5 mm.
Setting up target

Mar 8 1995 03:01:23:240PM950308032Brian LabombardShot: 32
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 3 mm.
Fizzle as expected.

Mar 8 1995 03:16:07:330PM950308033Brian LabombardShot: 33
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 3 mm.
Disruption after first scan. First density scan at .5e20
Now changing to 0.4 MA.

Mar 8 1995 03:28:30:990PM950308034Brian LabombardShot: 34
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 0 mm.
This is the required fizzle after a disruption.

Mar 8 1995 03:43:43:590PM950308035Brian LabombardShot: 35
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 0 mm.
Divertor detaches gradually as density rises.
Full plasma detachment at 0.845 sec.
Target is above 25 mm.

Mar 8 1995 04:10:27:260PM950308037Brian LabombardShot: 37
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 0 mm.
Plasma makes it to .86 sec. This should set the target for
the next shot.

Mar 8 1995 04:12:15:360PM950308038Brian LabombardShot: 38
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 8 mm.
Disrupts just after .3 sec.

.

Mar 8 1995 04:47:10:930PM950308040Brian LabombardShot: 40
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 8 mm.
Disrupts again just after .3 sec.
Changing to 0.6 MA on next shot.
Disrupts at .43 sec

Mar 8 1995 04:55:32:230PM950308041Brian LabombardShot: 41
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 0 mm.
Disrupts again just after .3 sec.
Changing to 0.6 MA on next shot.
Disrupts at .415 sec

Mar 8 1995 05:01:24:000PM950308042Brian LabombardShot: 42
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 0 mm.
Disrupts again just after .423

Physics Operator Comments
Mar 8 1995 08:28:42:520AMRobert GranetzSL: B. Labombard
PO: R. Granetz
EO: V. Bertolino

Today's run is devoted to MP #084, Scrape-off Layer Characterization II)
This was first attempted a week ago (950228), but was prematurely cancelled
due to disk quota problems. See the previous run summary and logbook
entries for general run plans and background info.

Mar 8 1995 08:46:59:810AM950308001Robert GranetzShot 001 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.135 s during rampdown, due to VDE. Lots
of moly injections. A few bits of hard x-rays. Gaps look
good, SSEP is marginal (1.5 cm). Multiple PF faults after the
shot ended.
Next shot: correct RCUR by entering offset of 8000 and adding 1 cm
to demand waveform. Also increase early gas puff.

Mar 8 1995 08:56:42:130AM950308002Robert GranetzShot 002 - Dud. EF2U upper didn't switch on, due to operator error (mine!).
Next shot: import segment 01 from yesterday's run, and reset all
switch times to yesterday's as well. Increase ZXU by 0.5 cm in
order to increase SSEP from 1.5 to 2.0

Mar 8 1995 09:03:34:320AM950308003Robert GranetzShot 003 - Runaway shot.
Next shot: adjust pre-fill from 2.0 to 2.4e-5 torr

Mar 8 1995 09:16:17:820AM950308004Robert GranetzShot 004 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.12 s during rampdown, due to a VDE. No
hard x-rays. Density had a lot of wobbles on it.
Next shot: lower proportional gain on density feedback. Also
lower the proportional gain on fast ZCUR after 1.0 s.

Mar 8 1995 09:47:10:920AM950308005Robert GranetzShot 005 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.07 s, due to VDE. There were a few hard
x-rays. Density still had wobbles.
Next shot: lower derivative gain on fast ZCUR after 1 sec, and
also turn down proportional gain on density again. Also raise
pre-fill from 2.4 to 2.5e-5 torr.

Mar 8 1995 09:45:33:040AM950308006Robert GranetzShot 006 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.06 s, VDE. Density wobbles are gone.
Next shot: tweak ZXL programming to try and keep the probe target
point fixed better (it's varying by 2 mm). Also reduce proportional
gain on slow ZCUR after 1 s.

Mar 8 1995 09:56:12:440AM950308007Robert GranetzShot 007 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.06 s, VDE. Density did not reach the
requested maximum.
Next shot: tweak up the max demand density. Return all fast and
slow ZCUR gains (P's and D's) to the settings at the beginning
of today's run. Change CLEARIN to push the plasma against the
inner wall shortly after 1 s.

Mar 8 1995 10:01:12:260AM950308008Robert GranetzShot 008 - Fizzle.
Next shot: reduce pre-fill from 2.5 to 2.4e-5 torr.

Mar 8 1995 10:15:57:740AM950308009Robert GranetzShot 009 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.10 s. Density was okay, but there were some
hard x-rays.
Next shot: tweak ZXU to keep SSEP more constant. Increase range
of density ramp. Set it for nl_04=0.8e20 at 0.55 s, and
1.6e20 at 1.0 s. Also increase early gas puffing a little.

Mar 8 1995 10:33:21:710AM950308010Robert GranetzShot 010 - Fizzle.
Next shot: on Earl's advice, lower OH1 voltage by 20 volts between
t=5 to 15 ms

Mar 8 1995 10:49:48:470AM950308011Robert GranetzShot 011 - Plasma, made it to 1.35 s before disrupting. Density makes it
only to 1.3e20 m-2.
Next shot: Change density pre-programmed voltage to better match
what we got.

Mar 8 1995 11:01:09:620AM950308012Robert GranetzShot 012 - Plasma, made it to 1.35 s again before disrupting. Density ramp
was pretty good.
Next shot: move CLEARIN even further in after 1.3 s. Tweak ZXL
at bit to keep probe target point fixed better, and also increase
the density ramp: nl_04=1.0e20 at 0.55 s and 2.0e20 at 1.0 s

Mar 8 1995 11:12:57:860AM950308013Robert GranetzShot 013 - Plasma, disrupted upward at 0.97 s. Density made it to 1.7e20 m-2.
This ends the probe dataset at 0.8 MA.
Next shot: raise plasma current to 1.0 MA.

Mar 8 1995 11:31:50:110AM950308014Robert GranetzShot 014 - Plasma, bad VDE disruption at 0.58 s, with Ihalo_l=236 kA.
Kappa=1.66.
Next shot: lower proportional gain on fast ZCUR after 0.35 s.

Mar 8 1995 11:39:52:250AM950308015Robert GranetzShot 015 - Fizzle.
Next shot: try again.

Mar 8 1995 11:53:36:170AM950308016Robert GranetzShot 016 - Plasma, VDE disruption upwards at 0.56 s.
Next shot: half the slow ZCUR proportional gain, and return the
fast ZCUR gain to its earlier value.

Mar 8 1995 11:59:25:820AM950308017Robert GranetzShot 017 - Dud. Caused by multiple power supply misbehavior.
Next shot: try again

Mar 8 1995 12:18:25:170PM950308018Robert GranetzShot 018 - Fizzle. Way too much vertical field. No reason why.
Next shot: try again

Mar 8 1995 12:26:57:320PM950308019Robert GranetzShot 019 - Plasma, disrupted downwards at 0.71 s with Ihalo_l=245 kA.
Next shot: tweak fast ZCUR gain down. Raised EF4 to account
for higher plasma current.

Mar 8 1995 12:33:03:200PM950308020Robert GranetzShot 020 - Fizzle.
Next shot: load in higher density ramp, and the corresponding
pre-programmed voltage.

Mar 8 1995 12:42:01:900PM950308021Robert GranetzShot 021 - Plasma. Nice shot (finally!).
Next shot: repeat.

Mar 8 1995 12:54:25:350PM950308022Robert GranetzShot 022 - Plasma, but it terminates at 0.30 s due to a fault in EF1L at 0.2 s.
Next shot: repeat.

Mar 8 1995 01:12:59:180PM950308023Robert GranetzShot 023 - Plasma. No disruption. Some hard x-rays. Some of Brian's scanning
probes had problems.
Next shot: increase early gas puff and repeat

Mar 8 1995 01:25:51:120PM950308024Robert GranetzShot 024 - Plasma, nice shot. Brian's going to change the scanning probe
position by a few mm again on next shot.
Next shot: repeat

Mar 8 1995 01:36:02:020PM950308025Robert GranetzShot 025 - Plasma, disrupted at 0.62 s. VDE, but there's a huge injection
of something at 0.59 s.
Next shot: repeat

Mar 8 1995 01:43:53:540PM950308026Robert GranetzShot 026 - Fizzle.
Next shot: repeat

Mar 8 1995 01:58:17:080PM950308027Robert GranetzShot 027 - Plasma, nice shot. Scanning probe data looks good.
Next shot: higher density; set ramp to go from 1.0e20 at 0.55 s to
2.0e20 at 1.0 s

Mar 8 1995 02:16:38:760PM950308028Robert GranetzShot 028 - Plasma, nice shot. Density made it to 1.8e20 m-2.
Next shot: increase plenum pressure by about 20% and repeat.

Mar 8 1995 02:28:34:120PM950308029Robert GranetzShot 029 - Plasma, nice shot. Magnetics Traq_2 failed. Because of that, we
have to repeat this shot.
Next shot: repeat

Mar 8 1995 02:40:06:540PM950308030Robert GranetzShot 030 - Plasma, nice shot. Really good repeat.
Next shot: lower density; set ramp to go from 0.5e20 at 0.55 s to
1.0e20 at 1.0 s.

Mar 8 1995 02:57:16:880PM950308031Robert GranetzShot 031 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.05 s. Scanning probe was pulled back for
safety purposes.
Next shot: repeat (probably will be a fizzle though)

Mar 8 1995 03:00:50:100PM950308032Robert GranetzShot 032 - Fizzle.
Next shot: try again, one last time at this 1 MA level.

Mar 8 1995 03:15:38:480PM950308033Robert GranetzShot 033 - Plasma, disrupted at 0.64 s, with Ihalo_l=216 kA. Got scanning
probe data at the lowest density, which is what we were really after
Next shot: Change plasma current to only 0.4 MA. Adjust EF4
accordingly. Note that this will probably be a fizzle anyway.

Mar 8 1995 03:21:32:700PM950308034Robert GranetzShot 034 - Fizzle.
Next shot: try again.

Mar 8 1995 03:43:16:840PM950308035Robert GranetzShot 035 - Plasma, 0.4 MA, disrupts upward at 0.98 s. There's a very large
and very fast increase in density at 0.86 s, which is probably
a detachment. The lower x-point rides up very far onto the
inner divertor. So much for our othogonal controllers and
estimators.
Next shot: Move RXL out by 1.5 cm and ZXL down by 1.5 cm

Mar 8 1995 03:54:49:060PM950308036Robert GranetzShot 036 - Plasma, but disrupted at only 0.30 s. Kappa=1.59.
Next shot: move plasma down by 0.5 cm to reduce kappa.

Mar 8 1995 04:09:19:620PM950308037Robert GranetzShot 037 - Plasma, disrupted upward at 0.85 s. Magnetics traq_2 failed again.
Disruption happened at the same time as the density burst on
shot 035.
Next shot: lower the density ramp; 0.4e20 at 0.55 s to 0.8e20 at
1.0 s

Mar 8 1995 04:20:02:310PM950308038Robert GranetzShot 038 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.33 s.
Next shot: minor changes to lower x-point programming time.

Mar 8 1995 04:29:43:800PM950308039Robert GranetzShot 039 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.30 s due to VDE.
Give up on 0.4 MA.
Next shot: raise Ip to 0.6 MA, adjust EF4 accordingly, and return
density ramp to 0.5-1.0e20 m-2

Mar 8 1995 04:42:41:520PM950308040Robert GranetzShot 040 - Plasma, 0.6 MA, disrupted early at 0.42 s. Weird stuff on 2pi bolo
and x-rays starting at 0.3 s. Plasma is momentarily upper x-point.
Next shot: lower slow ZCUR P and D gains from 1.5 to 1.0.

Mar 8 1995 05:00:59:750PM950308041Robert GranetzShot 041 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.41 s. There was a big impurity
injection at 0.39 s.
Next shot: return slow ZCUR P and D gains to 1.5, and boost up
the fast ZCUR derivative gain from 6 to 9.

Mar 8 1995 05:01:15:100PM950308042Robert GranetzShot 042 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.42 s. Can't seem to overcome
the vertical instability problems at low plasma currents.

End of run.

Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
108:28:47:300AMPlasmaOkcomm faults after fizzle
208:47:22:640AMPlasmaOkno faults
308:56:53:080AMPlasmaOkno faults
409:05:33:300AMPlasmaOkno faults
509:19:35:170AMPlasmaOkdisruption, comm faults oh2u + oh1
609:33:37:460AMPlasmaOkdisruption induced comm faults oh2u, ef1u, oh1
709:44:07:920AMPlasmaOkdisruption induced comm faults oh2u, oh1
809:56:57:390AMPlasmaOkno faults
910:05:14:100AMPlasmaOkdisruption induced comm faults
1010:23:46:490AMPlasmaOkno faults
1110:36:50:720AMPlasmaOkpower supplies operating at optimum
1210:49:52:700AMPlasmaOkdisruption induced comm faults
1311:04:52:760AMPlasmaOkdisruption induced comm faults
1411:21:59:630AMPlasmaOkno faults
1511:33:58:990AMPlasmaOkno faults
1611:42:52:010AMPlasmaOkdisruption induced comm faults
1711:54:51:400AMPlasmaBadoh2s no good
1812:05:11:850PMPlasmaOkno faults
1912:13:50:960PMPlasmaOkdisruption induced comm faults
2012:27:52:400PMPlasmaOkno faults
2112:36:34:410PMPlasmaOkdisruption induced comm faults
2212:49:27:700PMPlasmaOkComm fault oh2 u&l EF1 U&l
2301:02:54:380PMPlasmaOkdisruption induced comm faults
2401:17:47:610PMPlasmaOkNo Faults.
2501:29:20:850PMPlasmaOkNo Faults.
2601:39:44:390PMPlasmaOkNo Faults
2701:51:31:350PMPlasmaOkComm faults OH2L, EF1U&L, OH1
2802:05:24:370PMPlasmaOkComm fault oh2U&L, EF1U&L, OH1
2902:18:30:160PMPlasmaOkNo Faults.
3002:32:06:490PMPlasmaOkComm fault OH1U&L, EF1U&L, OH1
3102:45:59:260PMPlasmaOkComm fault OH2U, OH1, EF1U
3202:59:06:850PMPlasmaOkNo Faults
3303:07:49:700PMPlasmaOkComm fault OH2L & EF1L
3403:19:29:010PMPlasmaOkNo Faults
3503:28:03:380PMPlasmaOkComm Fault OH2L
3603:44:05:100PMPlasmaOkComm Fault EF1L
3703:56:52:840PMPlasmaOkcomm Fault OH2L
3804:09:16:530PMPlasmaOkComm Fault OH2L
3904:22:19:110PMPlasmaOkComm Fault OH2L EF1U
4004:35:07:320PMPlasmaOkNo Faults.
4104:45:18:800PMPlasmaOkNO FAULTS>
4204:57:11:750PMPlasmaOkNo Faults.