| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Brian Labombard |
| Physics operator(s): | Robert Granetz |
| Engineering operator(s): | Vinny Bertolino,Joe Daigle |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| granetz/labombard |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:12:507PM |
| Author: To Be Determined |
| Session Leader's summary of run 950308 MP# 084 Scrape_off Layer Characterization II Physics Operator: Granetz Session Leader: LaBombard Engineering Operator: Bertolino/Daigle The goal of this run was to study the scaling of scrape-off layer conditions in single null diverted plasmas with plasma currents of 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 MA. *** The run plan was: 5.3 Tesla deuterium plasmas, no impurity gas injection, no special wall preconditioning (0) - start programming with 950228006 which is an 0.8 MA shot with very good constant strike point programming (probe 2 on outer divertor), very good scanning probe targeting, and good gaps. Five key equilibrium shape parameters need to be watched during this run: inner gap > 1.5 cm, outer gap > 1.5 cm, distance to second separatrix (SSEP on EFIT scope) > 1.7 cm, constant outer divertor strike point location, and constant scanning probe target flux surface location. (1) - tune up a density ramp from NL_04 = 0.5e20 at 0.5 sec to 1.0e20 at 1 sec. Fire the scanning probe at 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 sec. (3 shots) (2) - density ramp from NL_04 = 0.8e20 at 0.5 sec to 1.5e20 at 1 sec, fire probe (3 shots) (2a) - optional at 1.0 MA: density ramp from NL_04 = 1.0e20 at 0.5 sec to 2.0e20 at 1 sec, fire probe (3 shots) - repeat steps (1) and (2) for plasma currents of 0.6, 0.4, and 1.0 MA. (3) - for last 2 shots, return to 0.8 MA with density ramp NL_04 = 0.5e20 at 0.5 sec to 1.0e20 at 1 sec, fire probe *** The actual run was: We were successful in setting up the 0.8 MA and 1.0 MA plasmas with the three (or more) density ramps as stated in steps (2), (2a) and (3) above. A bit more time was taken than originally planned at the 1.0 MA level. This was partly due to the disruption-fizzle mode of operation that we had to live with and partly due to the need to optimize the data from the fast-scanning probe. It appears that the probe could not be inserted to the LCFS without over-currenting the bias power supplies (2 amps per probe at -200 volts). We had to settle for 2-3 mm outside the LCFS as the deepest penetration. The 1.0 MA plasmas came at a cost: we managed to get 3 disruption 'strikes' exceeding 200kA of halo current. Fortunately, the three strikes and you're out rule does not apply to tokamak disruptions, even though they are a violent offense. By 3:00 P.M. we were ready to attack the low current (0.4, 0.6 MA) part of the miniproposal. Due to limited time, we decided to focus on 0.4 MA in order to get the widest range in current. These plasmas were not to be. They typically disrupted early. Apparently they were vertically unstable despite attempts by Bob (with some help from the wire-heads at large) to adjust feedback gain on ZCUR. In the end we gave up on 0.4 MA thinking that 0.6 MA would be easier (more stable). Still, the 0.6 MA plasmas behaved the same way. This is puzzling since we were successful on 02-FEB-1995 to get some nice 0.5 MA plasmas. Bob's statement was something like "looks like we need some more discharge development in order to do these plasmas". I agree. The remainder of this miniproposal could be tougher to complete than the first part. I would declare the first part of the miniproposal (diverted part) half done. Although the point of it really was to perform a complete current scan ON THE SAME RUN DAY in order to eliminate any systematic variations between runs (probe area changes, EFIT reconstruction changes, other). However, given that this run is the backup for when the RF is not ready, we may still have a chance to do a the full current scan in a single day. See the phys_op_summary for a complete shot-by-shot commentary. Also entries were made in the logbook under the physics operator and session leader topics. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:36:53:473PM |
| Author: To Be Determined |
| Physics operator's summary for run 950308. SL: B. Labombard PO: R. Granetz EO: V. Bertolino Today's run is devoted to MP #084, Scrape-off Layer Characterization II) This was first attempted a week ago (950228), but was prematurely cancelled due to disk quota problems. The run basically requires a well-diverted plasma, into which Brian fires the scanning probe assembly three times during the shot. Parameters to be scanned are density (ramped during the shot) and plasma current. The goal is to get data at 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 MA. Machine operation today was typical. At 0.8 and 1.0 MA we managed to get plenty of good probe data. We eventually had numerous shots at these currents that were disruption free, although it was a struggle. Nearly all of the disruptions were due to loss of vertical control, and the reasons for this are not obvious...kappa was not excessive. Most of the 1.0 MA disruptions were followed by a fizzle. However, operation at 0.4 and 0.6 MA was not satisfactory. First of all, the finely tuned plasma shape (x-point locations, strike points, etc) that we had setup at the higher currents did not carry over to the lower currents. I conclude that our so-called `orthogonal' controllers (and probably also our estimators) are not very othogonal to plasma current. Secondly, the plasma was even less vertically stable, and we didn't manage to get any shot that made it to the end of flattop at these lower currents, although lots of tweaks to slow and fast ZCUR PD gains were made. Very little useful probe data was obtained at the low currents. Detailed shot log follows: Shot 001 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.135 s during rampdown, due to VDE. Lots of moly injections. A few bits of hard x-rays. Gaps look good, SSEP is marginal (1.5 cm). Multiple PF faults after the shot ended. Next shot: correct RCUR by entering offset of 8000 and adding 1 cm to demand waveform. Also increase early gas puff. Shot 002 - Dud. EF2U upper didn't switch on, due to operator error (mine!). Next shot: import segment 01 from yesterday's run, and reset all switch times to yesterday's as well. Increase ZXU by 0.5 cm in order to increase SSEP from 1.5 to 2.0 Shot 003 - Runaway shot. Next shot: adjust pre-fill from 2.0 to 2.4e-5 torr. Shot 004 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.12 s during rampdown, due to a VDE. No hard x-rays. Density had a lot of wobbles on it. Next shot: lower proportional gain on density feedback. Also lower the proportional gain on fast ZCUR after 1.0 s. Density program was also changed slightly, in order to accomodate probe firing times. Shot 005 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.07 s, due to VDE. There were a few hard x-rays. Density still had wobbles. Next shot: lower derivative gain on fast ZCUR after 1 sec, and also turn down proportional gain on density again. Also raise pre-fill from 2.4 to 2.5e-5 torr. Shot 006 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.06 s, VDE. Density wobbles are gone. Next shot: tweak ZXL programming to try and keep the probe target point fixed better (it's varying by 2 mm). Also reduce proportional gain on slow ZCUR after 1 s. Shot 007 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.06 s, VDE. Density did not reach the requested maximum. Next shot: tweak up the max demand density. Return all fast and slow ZCUR gains (P's and D's) to the settings at the beginning of today's run. Change CLEARIN to push the plasma against the inner wall shortly after 1 s. Shot 008 - Fizzle. Next shot: reduce pre-fill from 2.5 to 2.4e-5 torr. Shot 009 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.10 s. Density was okay, but there were some hard x-rays. Next shot: tweak ZXU to keep SSEP more constant. Increase range of density ramp. Set it for nl_04=0.8e20 at 0.55 s, and 1.6e20 at 1.0 s. Also increase early gas puffing a little. Shot 010 - Fizzle. Next shot: on Earl's advice, lower OH1 voltage by 20 volts between t=5 to 15 ms. Shot 011 - Plasma, made it to 1.35 s before disrupting. Density makes it only to 1.3e20 m-2. Next shot: Change density pre-programmed voltage to better match what we got. Shot 012 - Plasma, made it to 1.35 s again before disrupting. Density ramp was pretty good. Next shot: move CLEARIN even further in after 1.3 s. Tweak ZXL at bit to keep probe target point fixed better, and also increase the density ramp: nl_04=1.0e20 at 0.55 s and 2.0e20 at 1.0 s Shot 013 - Plasma, disrupted upward at 0.97 s. Density made it to 1.7e20 m-2. This ends the probe dataset at 0.8 MA. Next shot: raise plasma current to 1.0 MA and return density ramp to lower values (copy nl_04 programming from shot 009) Shot 014 - Plasma, bad VDE disruption at 0.58 s, with Ihalo_l=236 kA. Kappa=1.66. Next shot: lower proportional gain on fast ZCUR after 0.35 s. Shot 015 - Fizzle. Next shot: try again. Shot 016 - Plasma, VDE disruption upwards at 0.56 s. Next shot: half the slow ZCUR proportional gain, and return the fast ZCUR gain to its earlier value. Shot 017 - Dud. Caused by multiple power supply misbehavior. Next shot: try again Shot 018 - Fizzle. Way too much vertical field. No reason why. Next shot: try again Shot 019 - Plasma, disrupted downwards at 0.71 s with Ihalo_l=245 kA. Next shot: tweak fast ZCUR gain down. Raised EF4 to account for higher plasma current. Shot 020 - Fizzle. Next shot: load in higher density ramp, and the corresponding pre-programmed voltage. Shot 021 - Plasma. Nice shot (finally!). Next shot: repeat. Shot 022 - Plasma, but it terminates at 0.30 s due to a fault in EF1L at 0.2 s. Next shot: repeat. Shot 023 - Plasma. No disruption. Some hard x-rays. Some of Brian's scanning probes had problems. Next shot: increase early gas puff and repeat Shot 024 - Plasma, nice shot. Brian's going to change the scanning probe position by a few mm again on next shot. Next shot: repeat Shot 025 - Plasma, disrupted at 0.62 s. VDE, but there's a huge injection of something at 0.59 s. Next shot: repeat Shot 026 - Fizzle. Next shot: repeat Shot 027 - Plasma, nice shot. Scanning probe data looks good. Next shot: higher density; set ramp to go from 1.0e20 at 0.55 s to 2.0e20 at 1.0 s Shot 028 - Plasma, nice shot. Density made it to 1.8e20 m-2. Next shot: increase plenum pressure by about 20% and repeat. Shot 029 - Plasma, nice shot. Magnetics Traq_2 failed. Because of that, we have to repeat this shot. Next shot: repeat Shot 030 - Plasma, nice shot. Really good repeat. Next shot: lower density; set ramp to go from 0.5e20 at 0.55 s to 1.0e20 at 1.0 s. Shot 031 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.05 s. Scanning probe was pulled back for safety purposes. Next shot: repeat (probably will be a fizzle though) Shot 032 - Fizzle. Next shot: try again, one last time at this 1 MA level. Shot 033 - Plasma, disrupted at 0.64 s, with Ihalo_l=216 kA. Got scanning probe data at the lowest density, which is what we were really after Next shot: Change plasma current to only 0.4 MA. Adjust EF4 accordingly. Note that this will probably be a fizzle anyway. Shot 034 - Fizzle. Next shot: try again. Shot 035 - Plasma, 0.4 MA, disrupts upward at 0.98 s. There's a very large and very fast increase in density at 0.86 s, which is probably a detachment. The lower x-point rides up very far onto the inner divertor. So much for our othogonal controllers and estimators. Next shot: Move RXL out by 1.5 cm and ZXL down by 1.5 cm. Shot 036 - Plasma, but disrupted at only 0.30 s. Kappa=1.59. Next shot: move plasma down by 0.5 cm to reduce kappa. Shot 037 - Plasma, disrupted upward at 0.85 s. Magnetics traq_2 failed again. Disruption happened at the same time as the density burst on shot 035. Next shot: lower the density ramp; 0.4e20 at 0.55 s to 0.8e20 at 1.0 s Shot 038 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.33 s. Next shot: minor changes to lower x-point programming time. Shot 039 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.30 s due to VDE. Give up on 0.4 MA. Next shot: raise Ip to 0.6 MA, adjust EF4 accordingly, and return density ramp to 0.5-1.0e20 m-2. Shot 040 - Plasma, 0.6 MA, disrupted early at 0.42 s. Weird stuff on 2pi bolo and x-rays starting at 0.3 s. Plasma is momentarily upper x-point. Next shot: lower slow ZCUR P and D gains from 1.5 to 1.0. Shot 041 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.41 s. There was a big impurity injection at 0.39 s. Next shot: return slow ZCUR P and D gains to 1.5, and boost up the fast ZCUR derivative gain from 6 to 9. Shot 042 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.42 s. Can't seem to overcome the vertical instability problems at low plasma currents. End of run. |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Mar 8 1995 08:46:55:700AM | 950308001 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 1
No FSP. 0.8 MA plasma. Gaps look good ~ 2 cm. SSEP is 1.5 cm. Strike points looks good. Density ramp from 0.5e20 @ .5 sec to 1.0e20 at 1 sec - some wiggles though. |
| Mar 8 1995 08:50:13:710AM | 950308002 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 2
FSP firing at .5, .75 and 1.0 sec. Rest position 5 mm. No EF2 upper. |
| Mar 8 1995 09:03:00:790AM | 950308003 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 3
FSP firing at .6, .8 and 1.0 sec. Rest position 5 mm. very ulgy. disruption at 0.38 sec. |
| Mar 8 1995 09:18:20:770AM | 950308004 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 4
FSP firing at .6, .8 and 1.0 sec. Rest position 5 mm. Plasma. Still wobble on density. Made it to 2 mm outside LCFS. |
| Mar 8 1995 09:33:33:130AM | 950308005 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 5
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 7 mm. samples densities: .45, .77, .92 e10 First scan is 3 mm out. Second and third scans make it to LCFS |
| Mar 8 1995 09:42:44:460AM | 950308006 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 6
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 7 mm. samples densities: .5, .69, .88 e20 First scan is 2 mm outside, last two are at LCFS. |
| Mar 8 1995 09:52:46:190AM | 950308007 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 7
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 7 mm. samples densities: .47, .63, .76e20 2 mm outside on all three scans. |
| Mar 8 1995 09:59:48:660AM | 950308008 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 8
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 9 mm. No plasma |
| Mar 8 1995 10:15:05:120AM | 950308009 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 9
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 9 mm. samples densities: .47, .7, .92e20 First two scans make it to LCFS, last scan is 1mm inside. SSEP ramps down from 1.8 @ .6 sec to .12 @ 1. sec Try to fix this on next shot. |
| Mar 8 1995 10:29:43:040AM | 950308010 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 10
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 9 mm. no plasma |
| Mar 8 1995 10:48:50:040AM | 950308011 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 11
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 9 mm. samples denmsities: .8, 1., 1.3 e20 all three scans make it to LCFS. Moly injection at .48 sec. |
| Mar 8 1995 11:13:56:470AM | 950308012 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 12
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 9 mm. samples denmsities: .86, 11., 1.5 e20 first two scans make it to LCFS. third scan is 3 mm out. |
| Mar 8 1995 11:18:08:770AM | 950308013 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 13
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 9 mm. samples denmsities: 1.0, 1.35., 1.7 e20 All three scans make it to LCFS |
| Mar 8 1995 11:31:54:130AM | 950308014 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 14
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 0 mm. This is a 1 MA shot. Disrupted just before first scan. |
| Mar 8 1995 11:36:58:910AM | 950308015 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 15
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position -5 mm. fizzle. |
| Mar 8 1995 11:48:00:170AM | 950308016 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 16
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position -5 mm. 1MA disruption before first scan. |
| Mar 8 1995 11:58:50:600AM | 950308017 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 17
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position -5 mm. Dud. |
| Mar 8 1995 12:07:57:610PM | 950308018 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 18
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position -5 mm. Fizzle. |
| Mar 8 1995 12:37:03:120PM | 950308020 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 20
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position -5 mm. Guess what - fizzle! |
| Mar 8 1995 12:53:17:760PM | 950308022 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 22
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position +5 mm. Disrupted at .3 sec. |
| Mar 8 1995 01:13:44:160PM | 950308023 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 23
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 6 mm. Sampled densities: .9, 1.2, 1.4 e20 second scan is overinserted by 1 mm. Other two scans are at LCFS. |
| Mar 8 1995 01:38:20:610PM | 950308025 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 25
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 3 mm. diruption at .625 sec, just after first scan. |
| Mar 8 1995 01:41:51:260PM | 950308026 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 26
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 3 mm. Fizzle. |
| Mar 8 1995 02:03:59:970PM | 950308027 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 27
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 3 mm. samples densities: .88, 1.17, 1.4 e20 data looks the best so far. 3mm, 1mm, and 3mm outside LCFS |
| Mar 8 1995 02:18:49:890PM | 950308028 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 28
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 3 mm. samples densities: 1.28, 1.4, 1.7 e20 FSP data looks good. 2 mm outside LCFS. |
| Mar 8 1995 02:30:56:030PM | 950308029 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 29
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 3 mm. samples densities: 1.2, 1.53, 2.0 e20 FSP data looks good. FSP position=???. Traq digitizers crapped out on this shot. For EFIT to run, it will have to use a different coil set. Since this could change the estimate of the LCFS target for the scanning probe, we would rather repeat the shot and use the same coil set. |
| Mar 8 1995 02:42:34:300PM | 950308030 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 30
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 4.5 mm. samples densities: 1.2, 1.5, 2.0 e20 FSP data looks good. 3 mm, 1mm, 3mm outisde. |
| Mar 8 1995 02:56:59:740PM | 950308031 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 31
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position -5 mm. Setting up target |
| Mar 8 1995 03:01:23:240PM | 950308032 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 32
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 3 mm. Fizzle as expected. |
| Mar 8 1995 03:16:07:330PM | 950308033 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 33
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 3 mm. Disruption after first scan. First density scan at .5e20 Now changing to 0.4 MA. |
| Mar 8 1995 03:28:30:990PM | 950308034 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 34
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 0 mm. This is the required fizzle after a disruption. |
| Mar 8 1995 03:43:43:590PM | 950308035 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 35
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 0 mm. Divertor detaches gradually as density rises. Full plasma detachment at 0.845 sec. Target is above 25 mm. |
| Mar 8 1995 04:10:27:260PM | 950308037 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 37
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 0 mm. Plasma makes it to .86 sec. This should set the target for the next shot. |
| Mar 8 1995 04:12:15:360PM | 950308038 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 38
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 8 mm. Disrupts just after .3 sec. . |
| Mar 8 1995 04:47:10:930PM | 950308040 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 40
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 8 mm. Disrupts again just after .3 sec. Changing to 0.6 MA on next shot. Disrupts at .43 sec |
| Mar 8 1995 04:55:32:230PM | 950308041 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 41
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 0 mm. Disrupts again just after .3 sec. Changing to 0.6 MA on next shot. Disrupts at .415 sec |
| Mar 8 1995 05:01:24:000PM | 950308042 | Brian Labombard | Shot: 42
FSP firing at .6, .78 and .96 sec. Rest position 0 mm. Disrupts again just after .423 |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Mar 8 1995 08:28:42:520AM | Robert Granetz | SL: B. Labombard
PO: R. Granetz EO: V. Bertolino Today's run is devoted to MP #084, Scrape-off Layer Characterization II) This was first attempted a week ago (950228), but was prematurely cancelled due to disk quota problems. See the previous run summary and logbook entries for general run plans and background info. | |
| Mar 8 1995 08:46:59:810AM | 950308001 | Robert Granetz | Shot 001 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.135 s during rampdown, due to VDE. Lots
of moly injections. A few bits of hard x-rays. Gaps look good, SSEP is marginal (1.5 cm). Multiple PF faults after the shot ended. Next shot: correct RCUR by entering offset of 8000 and adding 1 cm to demand waveform. Also increase early gas puff. |
| Mar 8 1995 08:56:42:130AM | 950308002 | Robert Granetz | Shot 002 - Dud. EF2U upper didn't switch on, due to operator error (mine!).
Next shot: import segment 01 from yesterday's run, and reset all switch times to yesterday's as well. Increase ZXU by 0.5 cm in order to increase SSEP from 1.5 to 2.0 |
| Mar 8 1995 09:03:34:320AM | 950308003 | Robert Granetz | Shot 003 - Runaway shot.
Next shot: adjust pre-fill from 2.0 to 2.4e-5 torr |
| Mar 8 1995 09:16:17:820AM | 950308004 | Robert Granetz | Shot 004 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.12 s during rampdown, due to a VDE. No
hard x-rays. Density had a lot of wobbles on it. Next shot: lower proportional gain on density feedback. Also lower the proportional gain on fast ZCUR after 1.0 s. |
| Mar 8 1995 09:47:10:920AM | 950308005 | Robert Granetz | Shot 005 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.07 s, due to VDE. There were a few hard
x-rays. Density still had wobbles. Next shot: lower derivative gain on fast ZCUR after 1 sec, and also turn down proportional gain on density again. Also raise pre-fill from 2.4 to 2.5e-5 torr. |
| Mar 8 1995 09:45:33:040AM | 950308006 | Robert Granetz | Shot 006 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.06 s, VDE. Density wobbles are gone.
Next shot: tweak ZXL programming to try and keep the probe target point fixed better (it's varying by 2 mm). Also reduce proportional gain on slow ZCUR after 1 s. |
| Mar 8 1995 09:56:12:440AM | 950308007 | Robert Granetz | Shot 007 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.06 s, VDE. Density did not reach the
requested maximum. Next shot: tweak up the max demand density. Return all fast and slow ZCUR gains (P's and D's) to the settings at the beginning of today's run. Change CLEARIN to push the plasma against the inner wall shortly after 1 s. |
| Mar 8 1995 10:01:12:260AM | 950308008 | Robert Granetz | Shot 008 - Fizzle.
Next shot: reduce pre-fill from 2.5 to 2.4e-5 torr. |
| Mar 8 1995 10:15:57:740AM | 950308009 | Robert Granetz | Shot 009 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.10 s. Density was okay, but there were some
hard x-rays. Next shot: tweak ZXU to keep SSEP more constant. Increase range of density ramp. Set it for nl_04=0.8e20 at 0.55 s, and 1.6e20 at 1.0 s. Also increase early gas puffing a little. |
| Mar 8 1995 10:33:21:710AM | 950308010 | Robert Granetz | Shot 010 - Fizzle.
Next shot: on Earl's advice, lower OH1 voltage by 20 volts between t=5 to 15 ms |
| Mar 8 1995 10:49:48:470AM | 950308011 | Robert Granetz | Shot 011 - Plasma, made it to 1.35 s before disrupting. Density makes it
only to 1.3e20 m-2. Next shot: Change density pre-programmed voltage to better match what we got. |
| Mar 8 1995 11:01:09:620AM | 950308012 | Robert Granetz | Shot 012 - Plasma, made it to 1.35 s again before disrupting. Density ramp
was pretty good. Next shot: move CLEARIN even further in after 1.3 s. Tweak ZXL at bit to keep probe target point fixed better, and also increase the density ramp: nl_04=1.0e20 at 0.55 s and 2.0e20 at 1.0 s |
| Mar 8 1995 11:12:57:860AM | 950308013 | Robert Granetz | Shot 013 - Plasma, disrupted upward at 0.97 s. Density made it to 1.7e20 m-2.
This ends the probe dataset at 0.8 MA. Next shot: raise plasma current to 1.0 MA. |
| Mar 8 1995 11:31:50:110AM | 950308014 | Robert Granetz | Shot 014 - Plasma, bad VDE disruption at 0.58 s, with Ihalo_l=236 kA.
Kappa=1.66. Next shot: lower proportional gain on fast ZCUR after 0.35 s. |
| Mar 8 1995 11:39:52:250AM | 950308015 | Robert Granetz | Shot 015 - Fizzle.
Next shot: try again. |
| Mar 8 1995 11:53:36:170AM | 950308016 | Robert Granetz | Shot 016 - Plasma, VDE disruption upwards at 0.56 s.
Next shot: half the slow ZCUR proportional gain, and return the fast ZCUR gain to its earlier value. |
| Mar 8 1995 11:59:25:820AM | 950308017 | Robert Granetz | Shot 017 - Dud. Caused by multiple power supply misbehavior.
Next shot: try again |
| Mar 8 1995 12:18:25:170PM | 950308018 | Robert Granetz | Shot 018 - Fizzle. Way too much vertical field. No reason why.
Next shot: try again |
| Mar 8 1995 12:26:57:320PM | 950308019 | Robert Granetz | Shot 019 - Plasma, disrupted downwards at 0.71 s with Ihalo_l=245 kA.
Next shot: tweak fast ZCUR gain down. Raised EF4 to account for higher plasma current. |
| Mar 8 1995 12:33:03:200PM | 950308020 | Robert Granetz | Shot 020 - Fizzle.
Next shot: load in higher density ramp, and the corresponding pre-programmed voltage. |
| Mar 8 1995 12:42:01:900PM | 950308021 | Robert Granetz | Shot 021 - Plasma. Nice shot (finally!).
Next shot: repeat. |
| Mar 8 1995 12:54:25:350PM | 950308022 | Robert Granetz | Shot 022 - Plasma, but it terminates at 0.30 s due to a fault in EF1L at 0.2 s.
Next shot: repeat. |
| Mar 8 1995 01:12:59:180PM | 950308023 | Robert Granetz | Shot 023 - Plasma. No disruption. Some hard x-rays. Some of Brian's scanning
probes had problems. Next shot: increase early gas puff and repeat |
| Mar 8 1995 01:25:51:120PM | 950308024 | Robert Granetz | Shot 024 - Plasma, nice shot. Brian's going to change the scanning probe
position by a few mm again on next shot. Next shot: repeat |
| Mar 8 1995 01:36:02:020PM | 950308025 | Robert Granetz | Shot 025 - Plasma, disrupted at 0.62 s. VDE, but there's a huge injection
of something at 0.59 s. Next shot: repeat |
| Mar 8 1995 01:43:53:540PM | 950308026 | Robert Granetz | Shot 026 - Fizzle.
Next shot: repeat |
| Mar 8 1995 01:58:17:080PM | 950308027 | Robert Granetz | Shot 027 - Plasma, nice shot. Scanning probe data looks good.
Next shot: higher density; set ramp to go from 1.0e20 at 0.55 s to 2.0e20 at 1.0 s |
| Mar 8 1995 02:16:38:760PM | 950308028 | Robert Granetz | Shot 028 - Plasma, nice shot. Density made it to 1.8e20 m-2.
Next shot: increase plenum pressure by about 20% and repeat. |
| Mar 8 1995 02:28:34:120PM | 950308029 | Robert Granetz | Shot 029 - Plasma, nice shot. Magnetics Traq_2 failed. Because of that, we
have to repeat this shot. Next shot: repeat |
| Mar 8 1995 02:40:06:540PM | 950308030 | Robert Granetz | Shot 030 - Plasma, nice shot. Really good repeat.
Next shot: lower density; set ramp to go from 0.5e20 at 0.55 s to 1.0e20 at 1.0 s. |
| Mar 8 1995 02:57:16:880PM | 950308031 | Robert Granetz | Shot 031 - Plasma, disrupted at 1.05 s. Scanning probe was pulled back for
safety purposes. Next shot: repeat (probably will be a fizzle though) |
| Mar 8 1995 03:00:50:100PM | 950308032 | Robert Granetz | Shot 032 - Fizzle.
Next shot: try again, one last time at this 1 MA level. |
| Mar 8 1995 03:15:38:480PM | 950308033 | Robert Granetz | Shot 033 - Plasma, disrupted at 0.64 s, with Ihalo_l=216 kA. Got scanning
probe data at the lowest density, which is what we were really after Next shot: Change plasma current to only 0.4 MA. Adjust EF4 accordingly. Note that this will probably be a fizzle anyway. |
| Mar 8 1995 03:21:32:700PM | 950308034 | Robert Granetz | Shot 034 - Fizzle.
Next shot: try again. |
| Mar 8 1995 03:43:16:840PM | 950308035 | Robert Granetz | Shot 035 - Plasma, 0.4 MA, disrupts upward at 0.98 s. There's a very large
and very fast increase in density at 0.86 s, which is probably a detachment. The lower x-point rides up very far onto the inner divertor. So much for our othogonal controllers and estimators. Next shot: Move RXL out by 1.5 cm and ZXL down by 1.5 cm |
| Mar 8 1995 03:54:49:060PM | 950308036 | Robert Granetz | Shot 036 - Plasma, but disrupted at only 0.30 s. Kappa=1.59.
Next shot: move plasma down by 0.5 cm to reduce kappa. |
| Mar 8 1995 04:09:19:620PM | 950308037 | Robert Granetz | Shot 037 - Plasma, disrupted upward at 0.85 s. Magnetics traq_2 failed again.
Disruption happened at the same time as the density burst on shot 035. Next shot: lower the density ramp; 0.4e20 at 0.55 s to 0.8e20 at 1.0 s |
| Mar 8 1995 04:20:02:310PM | 950308038 | Robert Granetz | Shot 038 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.33 s.
Next shot: minor changes to lower x-point programming time. |
| Mar 8 1995 04:29:43:800PM | 950308039 | Robert Granetz | Shot 039 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.30 s due to VDE.
Give up on 0.4 MA. Next shot: raise Ip to 0.6 MA, adjust EF4 accordingly, and return density ramp to 0.5-1.0e20 m-2 |
| Mar 8 1995 04:42:41:520PM | 950308040 | Robert Granetz | Shot 040 - Plasma, 0.6 MA, disrupted early at 0.42 s. Weird stuff on 2pi bolo
and x-rays starting at 0.3 s. Plasma is momentarily upper x-point. Next shot: lower slow ZCUR P and D gains from 1.5 to 1.0. |
| Mar 8 1995 05:00:59:750PM | 950308041 | Robert Granetz | Shot 041 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.41 s. There was a big impurity
injection at 0.39 s. Next shot: return slow ZCUR P and D gains to 1.5, and boost up the fast ZCUR derivative gain from 6 to 9. |
| Mar 8 1995 05:01:15:100PM | 950308042 | Robert Granetz | Shot 042 - Plasma, but disrupted early at 0.42 s. Can't seem to overcome
the vertical instability problems at low plasma currents. End of run. |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 08:28:47:300AM | Plasma | Ok | comm faults after fizzle |
| 2 | 08:47:22:640AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 3 | 08:56:53:080AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 4 | 09:05:33:300AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 5 | 09:19:35:170AM | Plasma | Ok | disruption, comm faults oh2u + oh1 |
| 6 | 09:33:37:460AM | Plasma | Ok | disruption induced comm faults oh2u, ef1u, oh1 |
| 7 | 09:44:07:920AM | Plasma | Ok | disruption induced comm faults oh2u, oh1 |
| 8 | 09:56:57:390AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 9 | 10:05:14:100AM | Plasma | Ok | disruption induced comm faults |
| 10 | 10:23:46:490AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 11 | 10:36:50:720AM | Plasma | Ok | power supplies operating at optimum |
| 12 | 10:49:52:700AM | Plasma | Ok | disruption induced comm faults |
| 13 | 11:04:52:760AM | Plasma | Ok | disruption induced comm faults |
| 14 | 11:21:59:630AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 15 | 11:33:58:990AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 16 | 11:42:52:010AM | Plasma | Ok | disruption induced comm faults |
| 17 | 11:54:51:400AM | Plasma | Bad | oh2s no good |
| 18 | 12:05:11:850PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 19 | 12:13:50:960PM | Plasma | Ok | disruption induced comm faults |
| 20 | 12:27:52:400PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults |
| 21 | 12:36:34:410PM | Plasma | Ok | disruption induced comm faults |
| 22 | 12:49:27:700PM | Plasma | Ok | Comm fault oh2 u&l EF1 U&l |
| 23 | 01:02:54:380PM | Plasma | Ok | disruption induced comm faults |
| 24 | 01:17:47:610PM | Plasma | Ok | No Faults. |
| 25 | 01:29:20:850PM | Plasma | Ok | No Faults. |
| 26 | 01:39:44:390PM | Plasma | Ok | No Faults |
| 27 | 01:51:31:350PM | Plasma | Ok | Comm faults OH2L, EF1U&L, OH1 |
| 28 | 02:05:24:370PM | Plasma | Ok | Comm fault oh2U&L, EF1U&L, OH1 |
| 29 | 02:18:30:160PM | Plasma | Ok | No Faults. |
| 30 | 02:32:06:490PM | Plasma | Ok | Comm fault OH1U&L, EF1U&L, OH1 |
| 31 | 02:45:59:260PM | Plasma | Ok | Comm fault OH2U, OH1, EF1U |
| 32 | 02:59:06:850PM | Plasma | Ok | No Faults |
| 33 | 03:07:49:700PM | Plasma | Ok | Comm fault OH2L & EF1L |
| 34 | 03:19:29:010PM | Plasma | Ok | No Faults |
| 35 | 03:28:03:380PM | Plasma | Ok | Comm Fault OH2L |
| 36 | 03:44:05:100PM | Plasma | Ok | Comm Fault EF1L |
| 37 | 03:56:52:840PM | Plasma | Ok | comm Fault OH2L |
| 38 | 04:09:16:530PM | Plasma | Ok | Comm Fault OH2L |
| 39 | 04:22:19:110PM | Plasma | Ok | Comm Fault OH2L EF1U |
| 40 | 04:35:07:320PM | Plasma | Ok | No Faults. |
| 41 | 04:45:18:800PM | Plasma | Ok | NO FAULTS> |
| 42 | 04:57:11:750PM | Plasma | Ok | No Faults. |