Alcator C-Mod Run 950530 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:116a
Date Filed: 4/18/1995
Title:Begin 8 Tesla plasma operation
First Author:Robert Granetz
Session Leader:Ian Hutchinson (shots 1-18)
Miniproposal:117
Date Filed: 4/18/1995
Title:3He Minority Heating at 7.9T
First Author:Yuichi Takase
Session Leader:Ian Hutchinson (shots 1-18)

Operators
Session leader(s):Ian Hutchinson,Ian Hutchinson
Physics operator(s):Steve Wolfe
Engineering operator(s):Joe Daigle,Vinny Bertolino

Engineering Operator Run Comment
8 Tesla Run Granetz/Wolfe/Bertolino/Silva

Session Leader Plans

Physics Operators Plans

Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:13:820PM
Author: To Be Determined
950530: First 8T run.

PO Wolfe
SL Hutch (for Granetz)
EO Bertolino

Summary:

A serious problem with TF regulation was discovered. The discovery was
done safely because the pulse duration was limited by inversion. The
cause of the problem was tracked down to an incorrect chip in the TF
regulator circuit. The chip was replaced and thereafter things went
OK. The last three shots 16-18 had He3 injected and saw heating during
the up to 2MW RF pulse. However, Mo radiation was rather strong. Shot
18 was 8T, 1MA - a nice demonstration of the engineering capability
improvements over recent months.

Overall, a rather successful first 8T run, with good physics and engineering
progress.

Details:

Load from Seg1 last Friday with tweaks. Seg2 950510010.

1 PS Test Tuesday morning test.
2 I2T Test
3 Pla 6.5T, 800kA, nl04=1.e20.
4 Pla 6.85T
5 Pla 7.5T Almost no regulation. We are gtetting more Bt than demand.
6 Pla 7.6T Earlier Bt initiate -1.4s. Starting to regulate.
7 Pla 7.9T No regulation. Just keeps rising till inversion.
8 Pla 7.54T TF set 208kA.TF init to -1.6. Regulation is still soft.
9 Pla 8.18T TF set at 212ka. TF regulation completely failed. Fortunately
we had decided not to move init any earlier. PF breakers pulled
at about 0.4s which killed the plasma slowly. Strange OH1 fault.
Kappa goes to 0.8 at the end of the shot!

Long pause to try to figure out what the TF power supply is doing.
Found that an incorrect op amp was installed on the current set/sense of
the TF control board that saturated at about 200kA.

10 PS OH1/OH2 test. OK.
11 PS 100 kA TF only test. OK.
12 Fiz 150 kA TF looks OK.
13 Pla 200 kA set regulates nicely at 192kA, 6.89T. Initiate at -1.6s.
14 Pla 210 set, 202 got. 7.2T. good regulation.
15 Pla 220 set 211 got. 7.57T. Regulates from 0.65s.
16 Pla Helium-3 added. 230 set 221 got. 7.93T. Regulates at 1s.
17 Pla 234 set 223 got. 8.01T. 1.8MW Rf some electron heating.
18 Pla 1MA attempt. 224kA. 8.06T. 1.01 MA. Increased He-3. ECE Michelson
is saturated so don't trusts its Te. Moly monitor is saturated during
the 2MW RF pulse.



Physics Operator Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:36:54:567PM
Author: To Be Determined
Physics Operator Summary for May 30, 1995
MP 116: 8Tesla Operation
MP117: D He3 Heating (piggyback)

SL: Hutch (substituting for Granetz)
PO: Wolfe
EO: Bertolino/Daigle

The goals for today's run were to establish 7.9 Tesla operation, raise the
plasma current to 1MA, and allow some initial tests of He3 minority heating.
These goals were successfully met, thanks to some expert trouble-shooting by
the engineering team. We actually got to 8.0T, 1.03MA, and observed RF
heating.

The startup plan was to breakdown on the ramp-up of the TF, with the TF moved
as early as necessary to get into regulation before the end of the pulse. We
started with a segment 1 copied from last Friday, with the IC_OH1 current
increased by 100A; this was intended for a TF start at -1.2sec. I intended to
increase the OH1 current further as the TF start was brought earlier, but it
turned out not to be necessary. The earliest TF start used was -1.7sec, or
about 30kA more on the TF at t=0 than the initial setting. Breakdowns were
very robust and current rises were fast (>100kA @30msec) all day, with the
exception of one fizzle when we went back down to 5.3Tesla. The fill started
at 2.0e-5 and changed to 2.2e-5 at shot #9.

Segment 2 was based on 950510010, an 800kA, 6.5Tesla shot with x-point control.
This was slightly modified to remove some funny gas programming.

Shots #1 and 2 were test shots.

The plan was to start from a TF current setting of 188kA, and increase the
setting by 10kA/shot until we got to 7.9Tesla (221kA). However, we found that
there was a strong non-linearity in the what-you-ask-for vs what-you-get
curve, corresponding to a large effective marginal gain at high currents.
Shot TF start PLC Setpoint TF Rogowski
----- ------------ ----------- ___________
3 -1.2 188 180
4 -1.2 198 190
5 -1.2 208 208 (no flattop)
6 -1.4 208 210
7 -1.4 214 220 (no flattop)
8 -1.6 208 209
9 -1.6 212 226 (no flattop)
At this point, it was clear something was wrong. If the TF invert had not
been set at +1.1 there is no telling how high the current would have gone on
shots 7 and 9. After much checking, the engineers determined that an op-amp
in the TF current regulation circuit was loading down, and could not drive
over 5.2 volts for any input, where 5V corresponded to 200kA. The op-amp was a
444, while the schematic specified a 324, which could drive smaller loads.
This op amp was replaced by the correct (specified) one, which was able to
drive up to 10V into the actual load.

Note that another non-linearity was also found by Gwinn: a plot of the sum of
the individual cabinet currents, as digitized in CAMAC, vs the TF rogowski
also showed a discrepancy increasing at high currents. The cause of this
non-linearity was not located, and it is still present. It is not clear why
this does not seem to affect the ask-for vs get curve, but it does not seem
to, as shown below.

Shot TF start PLC Setpoint TF Rogowski
----- ------------ ----------- ___________
11 -0.7 100 94
12 -1.2 156 150
13 -1.6 200 192
14 -1.6 210 201.6
15 -1.6 220 211
16 -1.6 230 220.6 (7.9Tesla)
17 -1.6 234 224 (8.0T, no flattop)
18 -1.7 234 224 (8.0T, short flattop)

He3 was pulsed from the B-side upper plenum on #16-18. RF power was over 1.5MW
on 17-18, and significant electron heating was observed on the polychromator
signal on these shots. Shot 18 was at 1MA, and had about twice the He3 as
16&17.

On all shots but the last two, the fizzle detector on the TF had a 1000msec
delay, which effectively would have kept it from shortening the TF pulse. On
#16 & 17 this was reduced to 100msec. In any case it didn't matter because
there were no fizzles except for shot 12 at the nominal 5.3Tesla field.

One of the RF antenna current probes was found to be dead, which prevented the
phase-balance arc detector from working correctly. This signal, which was a
redundant measurement, was disconnected during the long stoppage between shots
9 and 10. Thereafter both antennas worked normally.

In addition to the TF current over-shoot, shot 9 had a mysterious OH1 failure
with the supply going into a forced invert shortly after crossover. The plasma
ramped down, reaching a low elongation of 0.8. No fuses were found to be
blown, and the problem did not recur. Shot 10 was an OH only test.

Cooling times at the high TF currents are very long. The last shots required
over 20 minutes to get the TF arms cold (the usual top arms were lagging).
Scanner measurements indicated that up to 80% of the resistance was in the
central column after the high current pulses. The TF bus was observed with the
IR camera, and the heating was not found to be severe. Fuses were checked
between shots on all high current pulses.

Scorecard:
---------
Tests: 4
Duds: 0
Fizzles: 1
Plasmas: 13
-------- --
Total 18


Session Leader Comments

Physics Operator Comments
May 30 1995 07:25:21:310AMSteve WolfeMP116 8T Operation
MP 117 D-He3 heating (piggyback)

SL : Granetz (in absentia)
PO: Wolfe
EO: Bertolino

Engineering setup: Same as on 950510010, except:
TF start at -1.2sec
TF invert at +1.1sec
TF current set to 188ka (PLC setting)
TF fizzle detector disabled.
ECDC in D2 for at least 2hours prior to run.
A-side plenum to 19psi of D2.
B-side lower plenum 4psi Ar

Run plan:

Following the completion of engineering tests, we will begin trying for plasma
at 6.5 Tesla, starting with a shot similar to 950510010, except that breakdown
will be at a higher field. This will probably require some field tweaking.

We will then proceed to increase the TF current in 10kA increments until we
get to 220kA (nominal). The start time will be moved earlier, to about -1.5 sec
to get the 7.9Tesla flattop to begin around 0.5sec.

Once a shot is established at 800kA we will try increasing the current to 1MA.

RF will piggyback D-He3 heating scenario once we get to 7.9T. Try adjusting
He3 concentration to optimize heating.

May 30 1995 07:36:41:950AMSteve WolfeMP116 8T Operation
MP 117 D-He3 heating (piggyback)

Loaded prepared shot (pcs$wolfe: 950530901) at 07:18
Segment 2 similar to 950510010; segment 1 from 950526 with OH1 current
set 100A more negative.

Coldstart successful

May 30 1995 08:46:45:350AM950530001Steve WolfeShot 950530001

Tuesday Oh test. ok.

May 30 1995 09:05:38:660AM950530001Steve WolfeShot 950530002

I^2t test (no power) to determine if it pulls the breakers successfully
TF pulled, then after 3 sec the PF pulled. It seems to work.

May 30 1995 09:05:44:830AM950530002Steve WolfeShot 950530002

I^2t test (no power) to determine if it pulls the breakers successfully
TF pulled, then after 3 sec the PF pulled. It seems to work.

May 30 1995 09:22:13:020AM950530003Steve WolfeShot 950530003

Try for plasma. Fill=2.0e-5
TF at 188kA, TFstart at -1.2sec

Plasma. Ramped all the way down.
TF reaches flattop at .2sec, around 180kA.
Early current rise is a little slow, 70kA@30msec.
Radial field a bit positive, but leave it for now.

May 30 1995 09:41:26:530AM950530004Steve WolfeShot 950530004

Raise TF current to 198kA, same timing
RF will fire at low power.

Plasma - disrupts at 1.38sec, 300kA.
TF flattop at 0.5sec at 190msec
Better early current rise, 100ka at .03sec
RF got ~0.5MW, only one xmitter

May 30 1995 10:18:42:560AM950530005Steve WolfeShot 950530005

Raise TF current to 208kA, same timing
RF will fire at low power.
Enable Ar pulse 25msec at 0.3sec

Plasma - disrupts at 1.33sec
TF dis not reach flattop, but did get to 208 at 1.1sec!
The PLC reading seems to be non-linear in this range.
No, there is a problem with the reading (and feedback?) in the supply.

May 30 1995 10:32:13:720AM950530006Steve WolfeShot 950530006

TF start time to -1.4sec, no change in demand current.
See if it actually flattops

Plasma - ramps down ok
TF flattops around 210kA at around 0.8sec
Breakdown looks good, despite the fact I didn't tweak fields

May 30 1995 11:13:52:890AM950530007Steve WolfeShot 950530007

Raise TF set point to 214kA (was 208).
No change in timing.
RF is having a problem with D-port phase detector.

Plasma- ramped down ok.
TF got to 220kA, never regulated.

May 30 1995 11:31:42:470AM950530008Steve WolfeShot 950530008

Drop TF set to 208, TFstart at -1.6sec
Plasma - Got around 209kA, in "flattop" from around 0.6sec
It's not regulating all that well, even on this one; still rises
by 1-2ka.

May 30 1995 11:55:21:780AM950530009Steve WolfeShot 950530009

Drop TF set to 212, TFstart at -1.6sec
Raise fill to 2.2e-5
Note: TF cooling took about 22minutes after shot 8

Plasma - PF breaker pulled out early
OH1 had a problem at crossover.
TF current reached 226kA, did not regulate.
We will wait until the engineers figure out what's going on!

May 30 1995 02:36:35:540PM950530010Steve WolfeShot 950530010

OH test. should look like another Tuesday AM test:
Looks fine

May 30 1995 02:47:20:360PM950530011Steve WolfeShot 950530011

TF only test> set point at 100kA
Flattop at 94kA.

May 30 1995 03:01:05:580PM950530012Steve WolfeShot 950530012

Try for plasma, set 156kA, -1.0sec (go back to a normal 5.3T shot)

Fizzle. TF looks fine at 150kA.
Late bd; not surprising

May 30 1995 03:21:39:830PM950530013Steve WolfeShot 950530013

Set TF=200kA, start=-1.6
Plasma - ramps down fine.
TF gets to 192kA, flattop looks reasonable.

May 30 1995 03:43:34:680PM950530014Steve WolfeShot 950530014

Set TF=210kA, start=-1.6
Note: #13 is still showing the non-linearity in the sum of the cabinet
currents. This makes sense because those weren't changed. It may still
be a problem however.

Plasma - ramps down ok.
TF = 201.6kA.

May 30 1995 04:08:12:270PM950530015Steve WolfeShot 950530015

Set TF=220kA, start=-1.6
Plasma
TF at 211kA, flat from 0.65 sec

May 30 1995 04:33:44:400PM950530016Steve WolfeShot 950530016

Set TF=230kA, start=-1.6
Enable He3 pulse: open at 0.6sec for 15msec, then 20V till eof

Plasma - ramped down ok.
Got RF about 1MW
TF = 220.6kA, from 880msec

May 30 1995 04:54:41:370PM950530017Steve WolfeShot 950530017

Set TF=234kA, start=-1.6 (Try for 8T+, per IHH)
Decide not to go to 1MA.
Enable TF fizzle detector at +100msec

Plasma- TF got to 224KA, no flattop
Got 1.7MW of RF, some electron heating

May 30 1995 05:26:19:740PM950530018Steve WolfeShot 950530018

Set TF=234kA, start=-1.7 (Try for 8T+, per IHH)
go to 1MA.
INcrease He3 level to 40V
Enable TF fizzle detector at +100msec

Plasma - ramps down.
TF reaches 224.5kA
Over 2MW of RF
Looks like pretty good heating on the ECE poly. The Michaelson is
saturated
Moly monitor also saturates. Prad_core=2MW

Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
108:22:29:240AMTestOkcoax test
209:03:59:260AMTestOkI2t test ok
309:15:07:920AMPlasmaOk
409:34:03:230AMPlasmaOk
509:50:00:870AMPlasmaOk
610:22:13:320AMPlasmaOk
710:48:58:900AMPlasmaOk
811:16:56:440AMPlasmaOk
911:42:26:010AMPlasmaBadoh1 type 1
1002:33:07:710PMTestOkcoax test
1102:45:12:210PMTestOktf only
1202:56:34:080PMPlasmaOk
1303:17:03:460PMPlasmaOk
1403:34:17:280PMPlasmaOk
1503:57:17:140PMPlasmaOk
1604:25:30:530PMPlasmaOk
1704:47:06:750PMPlasmaOk
1805:12:14:670PMPlasmaOk