Alcator C-Mod Run 950606 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:
Date Filed:
Title:
First Author:
Session Leader:Martin Greenwald (shots 1-38)

Operators
Session leader(s):Martin Greenwald
Physics operator(s):Ian Hutchinson
Engineering operator(s):Vinny Bertolino

Engineering Operator Run Comment
hutch

Session Leader Plans

Physics Operators Plans

Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:13:880PM
Author: To Be Determined

Shot sequence plan

1. scan kappa from 0.9 to 1.5 at Ip = .5 MA, ne = 0.5 x 1020 - limited

2. scan kappa from 0.9 to 1.5 at Ip = .5 MA, ne = 1.5 x 1020 - limited

3. scan kappa from 0.9 to 1.5 at q95 = 4, (Ip ~ .45 to .8 MA) ne = 0.5 x
1020 - limited

4. scan kappa from 0.9 to 1.5 at q95 = 4, (Ip ~ .45 to .8 MA) ne = 1.5 x
1020 - limited (Assuming ~5 kappa's for each these scans, kappa = [.9,
1.0, 1.1, 1.3, 1.5] => 20 good shots)

Run Summary for 950606 - ohmic confinement, kappa scan
------------------------------------------------------

Objective:
Test possible explanations for the observed difference in confinement scaling
between C-Mod and Alcator C. This run will focus on effects of plasma shaping.

Plan:
a. scan kappa for otherwise identical discharges. - this should be done
at two densities, the first at the lowest feasible density to explore
the "neo-Alcator" regime (nebar = .5e20 if possible), the second at a
higher density where we have previously seen no density dependence
(nebar = 1.5e20).

b. scan kappa at fixed q - use the same two densities

Toroidal Field: 5.3
Plasma Current: 0.4-0.8 MA
Working gas species: D2

Results: The run went pretty well considering the unusual requirements.
Getting low density was difficult due to impurity and radiation problems
and (maybe) to the highly non-linear nature of the pulsed gas valve at
low flow rates. Of 38 total shots 25 may be suitable for analysis.

for the constant Ip = .5 scans

Shot nebar kappa
950606003 .75-1. 1.15
950606006 .55-.7 1.15
950606007 .45-.75 1.15
950606008 .4-.5 1.15
950606009 .5 1.04
950606010 .5 0.98
950606011 .5 0.98
950606012 .5-.65 0.95
950606013 .5-.65 0.95
950606014 .4-.5 1.4
950606015 .6-.8 1.4
950606016 .6-.9 1.4
950606017 .5-.7 1.4
950606018 .5-.7 1.2
950606019 1.4-1.7 1.2
950606021 1.4 1.2
950606022 1.4 1.1
950606023 1.4 1.03
950606024 1.3-1.4 0.95
950606025 1.3-1.4 0.95
950606026 1.3-1.4 1.4

for the constant q = 4 scan

shot nebar kappa ip
950606030 .7 1.4 .76
950606035 .7-.8 1.4 .75
950606036 .8 1.2 .63
950606038 .55 1.03 .51


Physics Operator Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:36:54:677PM
Author: To Be Determined
950606 Kappa Scan from .9 to 1.5.

SL Greenwald
PO Hutch
EO Bertolino

Do a controlled low density kappa scan to investigate the kappa dependence
of tauE and try to figure out the absence of NeoAlcator scaling.

Summary
_______

The kappa estimator/controller works but has offset and calibration problems.
With the present reference, asking for 1.2 gave nearly 1.4, asking for 1.1
gave nearly 1.2, and there seemed to be an offset of about .05 near kappa=1.

It was generally rather difficult to run with n_bar less than 0.6e20 but
we did so on a number of shots. Bright runaway light was seen on the TV
and looks like synchrotorn radiation. At any rate it is tangential beaming.

The controlled kappa scans at density of n_bar=.5 and 1.5 e20 were done.
Low density has very high radiation and zeff. The radiation drops as
kappa is increased. Input power (i.e. loop voltage) also drops, implying
a strong rise of tauE with kappa at low density.

A kappa scan at constant safety factor at low density was also accomplished.
Time did not permit the constant q scan at higher density.

Scorecard:
_________
Shot,Duration(s),Ipmax(MA) Shot,Duration(s),Ipmax
1 0.000 0.018 2 0.000 0.037
3 1.477 0.530 4 0.597 0.523
5 0.000 0.008 6 1.479 0.530
7 1.477 0.523 8 1.480 0.512
9 1.474 0.502 10 1.462 0.505
11 0.599 0.541 12 1.473 0.499
13 1.470 0.505 14 1.490 0.538
15 1.487 0.541 16 1.491 0.549
17 1.489 0.538 18 1.481 0.528
19 1.109 0.533 20 0.000 0.024
21 1.482 0.538 22 1.481 0.538
23 1.474 0.533 24 1.477 0.530
25 1.474 0.525 26 1.478 0.564
27 0.377 0.549 28 1.494 0.533
29 1.469 0.538 30 1.100 0.780
31 0.440 0.830 32 0.449 0.830
33 0.576 0.828 34 0.000 0.029
35 1.029 0.815 36 1.486 0.642

*** Consider increasing shotmax. 36
Finished summary for 950606 Total of 36 shots.
36 shots. 31 plasmas. 3 fizzles. 2 duds.



Details
_______

Load segment2 from 950516006. Kappa reference is 1. (ztop=.23,zbot=-.23m)
Move zxl and zxu out by 5 cm to reduce triangularity.
Lower nl04 to 4e20. (Remember the important L changes this run.)
Fill at 2.0e-5.

1 PS test.

Coldstart Ok

2 Fiz 40 kA bounce.

Raise fill to 2.4
3 Ran to 1.5 s. EF4 is close to zero so crossover is a problem.

Raise gain on zxu,zxl to 5=20s^-1.
Lower Ip fractionally to 500kA and raise its early gain
Lower nl04 to ramp from 3. to 1.5e19.
4 Disrupts at .6 sec. Power supply problems. OH2L trips at .18s and
pulls all PFs shortly thereafter. Plasma ramps down surprisingly well.

Remove the step up in the pulse gas 3 V at near .2s that seems to
be giving an extra puff.
5 PS dud Hardly any power supplies. Type 3 fault from cryo.

Raise derivative on RCUR in segment 1 to 9 from 6 V/V.
6 Went till 1.5s. Some TV speckles at the end. kappa 1.1 with a slight
down ramp to 1 at OH1 cross-over .5s. Density still a little high.

Move zxl,u to .06 tried .08 but overflowed.
add argon puff, 23ms at 120ms.
lower nl04 at .22s. add gas puf at the end using nl04 for hards.
7 No speckles. EF4 stays positive after its cross-over.
Still n too high.

Lower nl04 to .2, lower gas3 V during .1-.9s.
Shorten Argon puff to 15ms because Rice has too much signal.
Lower EF2byEf4 gain to 1.
8 Lower density obtained. Bright central region on TV speckles etc.
RAther a lot of hards there.

Raised end gas to nl04=6. Installed an upramp .2 to .3 nl04.
Installed integral gain on kappa at .5 V/V this makes PI=20,20 s^-1(2)
Set kappa to -.1.
9 Still a bright plasma center. But the end gas puff stops it.
Got kappa of about .96 consistent with the kappa error of 30000.
Plasma very resistive early nearly dies at .2s.

Raise integral gain to 2.
10 Rather more non-thermal. Clear asymmetric central radiation on the
wide angle TV. Synchrotron?

Raise kappa gain to 7., set to -.15
Raise nl04 to .35 at 1s.
11 Disrupts at .58s. EF3/OH2 showing signs of instability.
RCUR instability is evident. Kappa get below .9.

Lowered kappa gain back to 5.
Increased RCUR P to 9.5 from 6.
Added wire 10 with D gain of .5 which is equivalent to 5 on wire 1.
So total D is of order .15 physics.
12 Survived, but higher frequency oscillation. Around 50 Hz.
Got kappa of .87 at .5s. YAG did not go.

Repeat
13 OK.

Discovered that the late density drop is due to gas3 V-program. Fixed.
Set kappa to (1+).2. Kappa gain to .7
14 Got Kappa of 1.4. There seems to be a calibration problem.
Phys-A-Out shows we are following the controller well; so this is
a predictor calibration issue. We could recalculate, but not now.
This is a very low density because of geometry.

lower gas puff 3 to 25V during .05 to .1s.
increase nl04 to 2.8 ramping to 5.2
15 Got .34e20 rather too high, Ramp is OK.

Raised PG3 at .1 to .2s to try to keep the density near the right
value so we don't over puff later.
16 Did not work to lower the density.

Lower PG3 V during .2 to .5s. Lower nl04 to .25.
17 Got .27e20 at .4s ramping to .5.
OK for the data.

Set kappa 1.1.
Lower nl04 to .23 ramping to .45.
18 OK. got .27e20 ramping. Got kappa about 1.2

Start higher density kappa-scan.
Set nl04 to .7-1.3e20. Raise segment 1 PG3 to 25-30V.
19 Got resistive at the end. Disrupts at 1s.
Current sags.

Raise Ip gain to 9 from 6. Raise OH Vs to 170V(OH1) and 20V(OH2)
Remove most of the density ramp.
20 Fiz

EF4 to -1090 from -1100. Fill to 2.0e-5.
21 Ran to 1.5s. got kappa of 1.2.

Lower kappa to 1.0. Lower nl04 to .58
22 Got nl04=.58. kappa 1.05 (mfil) (1.1 EFIT).

Lower kappa to .95. nl04 to .55.
23 Got nl04 5.4 to 6.3. q=4 after cross-over. kappa .98 (Efit kappa 1.03)

Lower kappa to .88. nl04 to .52
24 Slight Oh1 oscillations. kappa =.92 nl=.51.

kappa to .84. Argon was to have been off but the gremlins got us.
25 kappa .89. looks as if I forgot to load.

kappa to 1.2, nl to .8.
Shorten Argon to 12 ms.
26 Got kappa=1.42, nl=.83to .9e20.
Argon was nearly a factor 12 less. Radiation is much reduced.
This is the argon off test. It looks like argon is important.

Reset Argon to 18ms but set its pressure to 2 psi from 4.
27 Disrupt at .38s due to density feedback running wild.
Fuels to the Greenwald limit. Limited plasma.

Repeat.
28 Runaways later. Density feedback borke again and turned off the gas.
Low density.

Repeat.
29 nl=.85e20 at last.

Start Constant-q scan.
Raise Ip to .75MA, nl04 to .28-.32e19.

30 EF2s remain high throughout. disrupts at 1.07s apparently too much
gas puff at the end.
Got kappa=1.36. nl04=.38 to .43e20.

Lower nl04 puff at the end and PG3 throughout.
31 Disrupts at .44 sec. Might be the EF2s coming out of saturation.
Not a VDE. Density just too low.

Restore some of the early PG3 voltage.
32 Same sort of thing.

Set nl04 to be at .27 from about .15s.
Turned the kappa into a ramp from 0. to .4s to help Ef2s.
33 Disrupts at .5s. A little extra density gets it further.

Set nl04 to .4 at .4s. Then allow to droop.
34 Fiz 32kA at 14ms. late breakdown 7ms.

Raise fill pressure to 2.2.
35 OK but density stays about .4e20. Disrupts at 1s.

Lower kappa to 1.1 demand (1.2 equiv). Lower current to .62MA.
NL04 to .35 at .4s.
36 Got kappa of 1.18, nl04 of .36.

Lower nl04 to about .23 and ease off the ramp-dwonw gas puff.
Lower Ip to .5
Lower kappa to .95.
37 Disrupts at .33s. Very resistive and low density.

Top up plenum to 20 from 18psi. Raise .26s nl04 to nearly .3.
38 Nice shot. NL04=.24

Session Leader Comments
Jun 6 1995 08:27:47:500AMMartin GreenwaldTest possible explanations for the observed difference in confinement scaling
between C-Mod and Alcator C. This run will focus on effects of plasma shaping.

The scans we need to do are:

a. scan kappa for otherwise identical discharges. - this should be done
at two densities, the first at the lowest feasible density to explore
the "neo-Alcator" regime (nebar = .5e20 if possible), the second at a
higher density where we have previously seen no density dependence
(nebar = 1.5e20).

b. scan kappa at fixed q - use the same two densities

Toroidal Field: 5.3
Plasma Current: 0.4-0.8 MA
Working gas species: D2

Shot sequence plan

1. scan kappa from 0.9 to 1.5 at Ip = .5 MA, ne = 0.5 x 1020 - limited

2. scan kappa from 0.9 to 1.5 at Ip = .5 MA, ne = 1.5 x 1020 - limited

3. scan kappa from 0.9 to 1.5 at q95 = 4, (Ip ~ .45 to .8 MA) ne = 0.5 x
1020 - limited

4. scan kappa from 0.9 to 1.5 at q95 = 4, (Ip ~ .45 to .8 MA) ne = 1.5 x
1020 - limited (Assuming ~5 kappa's for each these scans, kappa = [.9,
1.0, 1.1, 1.3, 1.5] => 20 good shots)

Jun 6 1995 08:56:27:350AM950606002Martin Greenwaldfizzle

Jun 6 1995 08:55:29:680AM950606003Martin GreenwaldGood shot
Ip = .51
a = .225
kappa = 1.15
nebar_07 = 1 -> .75 (ramping down)

Jun 6 1995 09:04:54:920AM950606003Martin Greenwaldpower supply problem - short shot

Jun 6 1995 09:05:10:150AM950606004Martin Greenwaldpower supply problem - short shot

Jun 6 1995 09:21:11:260AM950606005Martin Greenwaldpower supply problem - no shot

Jun 6 1995 09:31:46:530AM950606006Martin GreenwaldGood shot
Ip = .5
a = .225
kappa = 1.15
nebar_07 = .7 -> .55 (ramping down)

Jun 6 1995 09:51:03:220AM950606007Martin GreenwaldGood shot
Ip = .5
a = .225
kappa = 1.15
nebar_07 = .75 -> .45 (ramping down)

Jun 6 1995 10:06:36:450AM950606008Martin GreenwaldGood shot
Ip = .5
a = .225
kappa = 1.15
nebar_07 = .5 -> .4 (ramping down)

Jun 6 1995 10:23:14:830AM950606009Martin GreenwaldGood shot
Ip = .5
a = .225
kappa = 1.04
nebar_07 = .5 (ramping down)

Jun 6 1995 10:47:27:840AM950606010Martin GreenwaldGood shot
Ip = .5
a = .225
kappa = .98
nebar_07 = .5

Jun 6 1995 10:46:23:860AM950606011Martin GreenwaldGood shot
Ip = .5
a = .225
kappa = .98
nebar_07 = .5

Jun 6 1995 11:00:13:460AM950606011Martin GreenwaldDisrupts - radial instability

Jun 6 1995 11:12:55:660AM950606012Martin GreenwaldGood shot
Ip = .51
a = .225
kappa = .95
nebar_07 = .5 -> .65 (ramping down)

Jun 6 1995 11:24:20:740AM950606013Martin GreenwaldGood shot
Ip = .51
a = .225
kappa = .95
nebar_07 = .5 -> .65 (ramping down)

Jun 6 1995 11:36:37:040AM950606014Martin Greenwaldkappa higher than expected (1.4 instead of 1.2) so density too low
a bit disruptive besides

Jun 6 1995 11:49:35:700AM950606015Martin GreenwaldGood shot but density a bit too high.

kappa = 1.4

Jun 6 1995 12:28:01:940PM950606016Martin GreenwaldGood shot - but density still a bit high
nebar_07 = .6 ->.9 ramp up
kappa = 1.4

Jun 6 1995 12:26:42:720PM950606017Martin GreenwaldGood shot
nebar_07 = .5 ->.7 ramp up
kappa = 1.4

Jun 6 1995 12:42:48:390PM950606018Martin GreenwaldGood shot
nebar_07 = .5 ->.7 ramp up
kappa = 1.2

Jun 6 1995 12:51:58:210PM950606019Martin GreenwaldGood shot
nebar_07 = 1.4 ->1.7 ramp up
kappa = 1.2

Jun 6 1995 12:54:32:010PM950606020Martin Greenwaldfizzle

Jun 6 1995 01:14:31:990PM950606021Martin GreenwaldGood shot
nebar 07 = 1.4
kappa = 1.2

Jun 6 1995 01:27:42:840PM950606022Martin GreenwaldGood shot
nebar 07 = 1.4
kappa = 1.1

Jun 6 1995 01:51:57:450PM950606023Martin GreenwaldGood shot
nebar 07 = 1.4
kappa = 1.03

Jun 6 1995 01:57:31:360PM950606024Martin GreenwaldGood shot
nebar 07 = 1.3 - 1.4
kappa = .95

Jun 6 1995 02:09:49:030PM950606025Martin GreenwaldGood shot
nebar 07 = 1.3 - 1.4
kappa = .95

Jun 6 1995 02:26:51:800PM950606026Martin GreenwaldGood shot
nebar 07 = 1.3 - 1.4
kappa = 1.4

Jun 6 1995 02:39:23:900PM950606027Martin GreenwaldDisrupted - runaway gas puff

Jun 6 1995 02:57:58:250PM950606028Martin Greenwaldno density trace - very low

Jun 6 1995 03:20:46:720PM950606030Martin Greenwaldfirst shot of constant q scan
ip = .76
q95 = 4
nebar = .7

Jun 6 1995 03:28:25:270PM950606031Martin Greenwaldearly disruption

Jun 6 1995 03:39:53:010PM950606032Martin Greenwaldearly disruption

Jun 6 1995 03:53:02:920PM950606033Martin Greenwaldearly disruption

Jun 6 1995 03:56:06:130PM950606033Martin Greenwaldearly disruption
some analysis might be possible
nebar 07 = .5 .7
ip = .76
q95 = 4.3

Jun 6 1995 04:09:39:770PM950606034Martin Greenwaldfizzle

Jun 6 1995 04:36:13:360PM950606034Martin Greenwaldearly disruption
some analysis might be possible
nebar 07 = .5 .7
ip = .76
q95 = 4.3

Jun 6 1995 04:18:22:050PM950606035Martin Greenwaldnebar = .8
kappa = 1.4
ip = .76

Jun 6 1995 04:35:52:270PM950606035Martin Greenwaldnebar = .7 - .8
kappa = 1.2
ip = .75
q = 4.3

Jun 6 1995 04:34:35:000PM950606036Martin Greenwaldnebar = .8
kappa = 1.2
ip = .63
q = 4

Jun 6 1995 04:42:06:780PM950606037Martin Greenwalddisrupts early

Jun 6 1995 04:57:40:890PM950606038Martin GreenwaldIp = .51
q95 = 4
nebar 07 = .55
kappa = 1.03

Physics Operator Comments

Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
108:23:00:870AMTestOkcoax test
208:32:25:640AMPlasmaOk
308:43:09:870AMPlasmaOk
408:57:56:590AMPlasmaBadoh2l comm fault
509:12:45:440AMPlasmaBadmag resist type 3
609:22:58:620AMPlasmaOk
709:42:58:680AMPlasmaOk
809:57:03:010AMPlasmaOk
910:14:59:110AMPlasmaOk
1010:30:15:170AMPlasmaOk
1110:45:00:710AMPlasmaOk
1211:02:05:590AMPlasmaOk
1311:14:41:200AMPlasmaOk
1411:26:55:810AMPlasmaOk
1511:41:23:670AMPlasmaOk
1611:57:30:040AMPlasmaOk
1712:11:30:980PMPlasmaOk
1812:24:29:060PMPlasmaOk
1912:40:38:320PMPlasmaOk
2012:52:19:240PMPlasmaOk
2101:06:19:070PMPlasmaOk
2201:21:24:330PMPlasmaOk
2301:35:04:620PMPlasmaOk
2401:50:11:150PMPlasmaOk
2502:02:35:330PMPlasmaOk
2602:17:36:160PMPlasmaOk
2702:35:12:420PMPlasmaOk
2802:46:16:910PMPlasmaOk
2903:00:12:070PMPlasmaOk
3003:12:28:340PMPlasmaOk
3103:24:04:930PMPlasmaOk
3203:35:40:670PMPlasmaOk
3303:47:13:170PMPlasmaOk
3404:01:57:070PMPlasmaOk
3504:10:46:020PMPlasmaOk
3604:26:58:120PMPlasmaOk
3704:39:04:010PMPlasmaOk
3804:50:22:940PMPlasmaOk