| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Bruce Lipschultz |
| Physics operator(s): | Earl Marmar |
| Engineering operator(s): | Vinny Bertolino |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| detached divertor q-scan |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:13:897PM |
| Author: To Be Determined |
| Run # 950607 Engineering operator: V. Bertolino Physics operator E. Marmar Session leader B. Lipschultz The aim of today's run was to complete the q scan section of MP# 105, 'Dependence of Detachment Threshold and Radial Extent on Plasma Current and q". The difference noted at first glance at the data was that q has a strong effect on the detachment threshold. The detachment threshold today was nl04=1.5 (3.6 T), 1.2 (5.3 T) and 1. (7 T). This could be indicative that the field line length is very important for the interaction of neutrals with ions in the divertor. This result is similar to the flat-plate divertor result; those equilibria have higher detachment thresholds and shorter field line lengths in the divertor. There is also the possibility that the 1MA plasma result (higher threshold) is at least partly due to the q dependence found today. The q for 1 MA (5.3 T) was only slightly higher than that for the 800 kA, 3.6 T shots to day (20 %) and the detachment threshold was similar. The caveat to all these musings about q is that we need to properly look at the power flowing into the SOL and the separatrix Te for all of these shots to determine if there are significant changes there. I have only been able to glance at a few shots. For example one can compare shots 20 (3.5 T), 26 (5.3 T) and 28 (7 T), all at nl04=1.2e20. The power flowing into the SOL for these shots is .65, .45 & .25 respectively. Unfortunately, shot 28 is detached so not a good comparison. The difference between shots 20 & 26 is due to changes in both the input power and core radiated power. The other quick comparison is between shots 12 (3.6 T, nl04~1.0) and 30 (7T, same nl04). The P_SOL for the 2 shots is similar. Unfortunately, shot 12 is not steady state. There is only a short period when the density is correct and no H-mode soon after the injection at .6 seconds. So at first glance there does not seem to be large differences in P_SOL. The only other significant aspect of the day was the operating space at 3.6 T. We found that at too low a density that we were constantly being jerked in and out of H-mode. As the density was raised the operation was more dependable, but fewer H-modes. For future cases it appears that the fix to all our injections (shots 14-19) were fixed by raising the FSP feedback point. The run summary follows: shot #1: disruption early. shot #2: Disruption at 800 ms following H-mode. Strike point in region of probes 2 & 3. shot #3: Another disruption at 450 ms. The q is hovering around 3. We will lower the current slightly to see if we can obtain reproducible discharges. shot #4: 700 kA, another disruption at .75 seconds. Try again. shot #5: This shot went till 1.2 seconds with the usual dithering the whole time. Strike point betwen probes 2 & 3 for most of the shot. No FSP yet. Still 700 kA. shot #6: 700 kA. This shot lasted well through inversion. Next shot switch to FSP control and raise current to 750. shot #7: 750 kA, lasts till 1.16 seonds. nl04 oscillating around 1.e20 because of H-modes. shot #8: 800 kA, no FSP. Everything went fine. Next shot with FSP. shot #9: dud due to power supply problems shot #10: Elm-free H-modes galore. FSP fired. We aimed for constant density at ml04=1.e20 and got densities as high as 1.5. shot #11: fizzle shot #12: H-modes again with uncontrollable density, FSP scans ok. shot #13: fizzle shot #14: disruption at .5 seconds. shot #15: disruption at .48 seconds. shot #16: Disruption after .8 seconds. nl04=1.25e20. shot #17: Another disruption due to a large injection 'brick dropping'. shot #18: This one makes it to inversion. nl04=1.e20, FSP scans ok. H-modes as usual. shot #19: nl04=0.5e20. disruption at 0.6 seconds. FSP scan fine shot #20: Very nice. nl04=1.2e20. No FSP scans. Injection at .6 seconds ends H-mode. shot #21: Repeat of 20 with FSP scan. shot #22: nl04=1.5e20. FSP scans ok. Slight amount of detachment. shot #23: nl04 reaches 1.7e20. FSP scans ok. definite detachment shot #24: fizzle at 7 Tesla shot #25: nasty disruptive shot at 5.3 Tesla. shot #26: Nice shot at 5.3 Tesla. No FSP scan. nl04=1.2e20. Possible detachment. Next shot 7 Tesla. shot #27: fizzle shot #28: Shot fine at 7 Tesla (ramp reaches 7 Tesla at .8 seconds or so). nl04=1.2e20, FSP scans ok. Definite detachment! shot #29: nl04=1.4e20. FSP scan fine and detachment occurred. shot #30: nl04 ramps from .95 - 1.05 from 0.6-1.0 seconds. During that period the plasma detaches (near 1.05 e20), but not all the way up the divertor plate. FSP scans ok. shot #31: nl04=0.85e20. FSP scans fine. No detachment. shot #32: nl04 dropping from.7 to .55e20 through shot. FSP scans ok. No detachment. shot #33: repeat of shot 32 because some of the FSP data was not taken. FSP scan fine. shot #34: Back to 3.6 Tesla to try for lower density once again. Obtained usual H-modes with density varying from 1.3 to .8e20. Not a pretty shot. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Jun 7 1995 08:24:16:240AM | Bruce Lipschultz | Run # 950607
Engineering operator: V. Bertolino Physics operator E. Marmar Session leader B. Lipschultz Today we plan to try and complete MP# 105, 'Dependence of Detachment Threshold and Radial Extent on Plasma Current and q". The aspect we will study today is the q dependence of divertor and SOL paramteters. We plan to start at 3.5 Tesla, 800 kA and vary the density (from shot to shot) from nl04=0.7 - 1.5 or shigher. After this is finished we will go on to 7 Tesla or thereabout. The density scan will be repeated at that field. The usual perscription for good gaps all around the plasma is needed so that the SOL plasma is not limited from one divertor plate to the other. If both of these programs are finished (Ha ha!) we may return to the 800 kA flat-plate to finish some of that work. | |
| Jun 7 1995 08:49:48:080AM | 950607001 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #1: disruption early.
|
| Jun 7 1995 08:55:50:390AM | 950607002 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #2: Disruption at 800 ms following H-mode. Strike point in region of
probes 2 & 3. |
| Jun 7 1995 08:56:57:000AM | 950607002 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #2: Disruption at 800 ms following H-mode. Strike point in region of
probes 2 & 3. |
| Jun 7 1995 08:59:12:710AM | 950607003 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #3: Another disruption at 450 ms. The q is hovering around 3. We
will lower the current slightly to see if we can obtain reproducible discharges. |
| Jun 7 1995 09:14:44:680AM | 950607004 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #4: 700 kA, another disruption at .75 seconds. Try again.
|
| Jun 7 1995 09:35:15:640AM | 950607005 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #5: This shot went till 1.2 seconds with the usual dithering the
whole time. Strike point betwen probes 2 & 3 for most of the shot. No FSP yet. |
| Jun 7 1995 09:40:56:880AM | 950607006 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #6: 700 kA. This shot lasted well through inversion. Next shot
switch to FSP control and raise current to 750. |
| Jun 7 1995 10:01:49:200AM | 950607007 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #7: 750 kA, lasts till 1.16 seonds. nl04 oscillating around
1.e20 because of H-modes. |
| Jun 7 1995 10:17:27:110AM | 950607008 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #8: 800 kA, no FSP. Everything went fine. Next shot with FSP.
|
| Jun 7 1995 10:19:03:460AM | 950607009 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #9: dud due to power supply problems
|
| Jun 7 1995 10:56:09:900AM | 950607011 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #11: fizzle
|
| Jun 7 1995 10:58:07:870AM | 950607012 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #12: H-modes again with uncontrollable density, FSP scans ok.
|
| Jun 7 1995 11:05:18:890AM | 950607013 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #13: fizzle
|
| Jun 7 1995 11:19:35:350AM | 950607014 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #14: disruption at .5 seconds.
|
| Jun 7 1995 11:48:48:140AM | 950607015 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #15: disruption at .48 seconds.
|
| Jun 7 1995 11:51:13:290AM | 950607016 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #16: Disruption after .8 seconds. nl04=1.25e20.
|
| Jun 7 1995 12:00:52:800PM | 950607017 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #17: Another disruption due to a large injection 'brick dropping'.
|
| Jun 7 1995 12:16:40:340PM | 950607018 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #18: This one makes it to inversion. nl04=1.e20, FSP scans ok.
H-modes as usual. |
| Jun 7 1995 12:16:55:190PM | 950607018 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #18: This one makes it to inversion. nl04=1.e20, FSP scans ok.
H-modes as usual. |
| Jun 7 1995 12:32:57:720PM | 950607019 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #19: nl04=0.5e20. disruption at 0.6 seconds. FSP scan fine
|
| Jun 7 1995 12:34:40:970PM | 950607019 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #19: nl04=0.5e20. disruption at 0.6 seconds. FSP scan fine
|
| Jun 7 1995 12:42:55:750PM | 950607020 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #20: Very nice. nl04=1.2e20. No FSP scans. Injection of zirconium
at .6 seconds ens H-mode. |
| Jun 7 1995 12:53:12:660PM | 950607021 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #21: Repeat of 20 with FSP scan and Zr injection (.6 seconds)
|
| Jun 7 1995 01:26:40:440PM | 950607022 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #22: nl04=1.5e20. FSP scans ok. Slight amount of detachment.
|
| Jun 7 1995 01:31:42:140PM | 950607023 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #23: nl04 reaches 1.7e20. FSP scans ok. definite detachment
|
| Jun 7 1995 02:11:56:710PM | 950607024 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #24: fizzle at 7 Tesla
|
| Jun 7 1995 02:12:27:710PM | 950607025 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #25: nasty disruptive shot at 5.3 Tesla.
|
| Jun 7 1995 02:34:16:810PM | 950607026 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #26: Nice shot at 5.3 Tesla. No FSP scan. nl04=1.2e20. Possible
detachment. Next shot 7 Tesla. |
| Jun 7 1995 02:38:14:800PM | 950607027 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #27: fizzle
|
| Jun 7 1995 02:58:17:960PM | 950607028 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #28: Shot fine at 7 Tesla (ramp reaches 7 Tesla at .8 seconds or so).
nl04=1.2e20, FSP scans ok. Definite detachment! |
| Jun 7 1995 03:16:48:140PM | 950607029 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #29: nl04=1.4e20. FSP scan fine and detachment occurred.
|
| Jun 7 1995 03:36:43:020PM | 950607029 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #30: nl04 ramps from .95 - 1.05 from 0.6-1.0 seconds. During that
period the plasma detaches (near 1.05 e20), but not all the way up the divertor plate. FSP scans ok. |
| Jun 7 1995 03:44:21:390PM | 950607030 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #30: nl04 ramps from .95 - 1.05 from 0.6-1.0 seconds. During that
period the plasma detaches (near 1.05 e20), but not all the way up the divertor plate. FSP scans ok. |
| Jun 7 1995 04:00:27:650PM | 950607031 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #31: nl04=0.85e20. FSP scans fine. No detachment.
|
| Jun 7 1995 04:11:08:220PM | 950607032 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #32: nl04 dropping from.7 to .55e20 through shot. FSP scans ok.
No detachment. |
| Jun 7 1995 04:41:22:210PM | 950607033 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #33: repeat of shot 32 because some of the FSP data was
not taken. FSP scan fine. |
| Jun 7 1995 05:09:09:470PM | 950607034 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #34: Back to 3.6 Tesla to try for lower density once again. Obtained
usual H-modes with density varying from 1.3 to .8e20. Not a pretty shot. |
| Jun 7 1995 05:31:43:650PM | 950607034 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #34: Back to 3.6 Tesla to try for lower density once again. Obtained
usual H-modes with density varying from 1.3 to .8e20. Not a pretty shot. |
| Physics Operator Comments |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 08:28:03:880AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 2 | 08:42:12:910AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 08:53:01:480AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 4 | 09:03:15:570AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 09:14:41:120AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 09:26:59:510AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 09:40:15:590AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 09:52:53:200AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 10:04:55:060AM | Plasma | Bad | power supply faults |
| 10 | 10:22:43:050AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 10:37:05:100AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 10:47:37:740AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 11:00:21:380AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 11:12:02:430AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 11:23:15:230AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 11:38:14:170AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 11:52:47:860AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 12:05:44:700PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 12:17:53:810PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 12:30:58:580PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 12:43:29:240PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 12:56:38:960PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 01:12:34:020PM | Plasma | Ok | Comm Fail OH1 then 1SCR EF1U |
| 24 | 01:53:27:190PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 02:07:21:940PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 02:20:08:790PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 02:31:36:110PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 02:48:29:090PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 03:04:42:150PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 30 | 03:19:44:370PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 31 | 03:45:19:170PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 32 | 04:05:34:230PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 33 | 04:18:46:260PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 34 | 04:41:56:500PM | Plasma | Ok | |