| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Jeff Schachter |
| Physics operator(s): | John Goetz |
| Engineering operator(s): | Vinny Bertolino,Frank Silva |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| pellets |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:14:630PM |
| Author: To Be Determined |
| Run Summary for MP 123A (PEP Mode with D2 Pellets) - Jeff Schachter ================================================== We managed to get PEP modes on only 4 shots: 951212022, 028, 029, and 030. There were several shots which gave indications of a PEP mode, but these either disrupted, or the RF tripped out. Flaky RF late in the day was one problem with the run. The other major problem was bad pellets. As compared to the Li PEP modes, the D2 PEP modes we got weren't fantastic. We did get many H-Modes; a few were following a PEP mode Our peak neutron rate was on shot 951212022: 3.3e13/s. The peak line integral density achieved was on shot 951212028: 3.5e20 (NL04), at which time the YAG density at z=+1.5cm was 1.7e21. There doesn't appear to be a correlation between the maximum stored energy and the maximum neutron rate. Unlike with Li pellets, we weren't able to effectively suppress the sawteeth. For future reference, the DPI can fire 4 different sizes of pellets. They will be referred to as: Pellet # Particle Inventory (nominal) -------- ------------------ A 3.0 x 10^20 B 2.0 x 10^20 C 1.0 x 10^20 D 0.5 x 10^20 We started with shot 951129023 - a shot in which we fired a D2 pellet before the RF - and attempted to increase the PEP performance by (a) increasing pellet penetration (to fuel at or near the center) and (b) increasing the RF reheat after injection. Most of the work was spent on (a). To accomplish (a), we tried increasing the pre-pellet density (to cool the plasma), varying pellet size, and firing two pellets (the first cools it, the second reaches the center). We didn't do this in a systematic fashion. B and C size pellets, whether fired solo or first in a two pellet shot, did not reach the center with pre-pellet NL04 = 1.2 - 1.4e20. Because of this and the fact that the A size pellets were flaky, most of our attempts used two pellets in succession. The one shot in which we fired a good solo A size pellet gave a great PEP mode: 951212022. The other good PEP modes mentioned above were all with a B size pellet fired in 10 ms after a C size. We couldn't get good pellets to test 2 successive B sizes, and using A and B sizes in one shot always led to a disruption when the pellets were good. The pellet penetration seems to be sufficient to start the PEP mode. Comparing to the Li PEP modes: the length of the modes are comparable (50 ms), but Li gave higher neutron rates than D2. Aside from the isotopes, one difference between the best Li PEP shot and the best D2 PEP shot that could be significant is the relative timing of the injection and the RF. The Li pellets were fired in about 50 ms before the RF turned on, while the D2 pellets we were firing today were going in only 10 ms before the RF. This could indicate that the plasma needs time to "settle down" before the reheat in order to maximize the PEPiness, maybe because the current profile needs to adjust before being frozen in by the RF (see shot 26 below). We didn't have time to tweak this today. Here is a shot-by-shot summary. For more details on each shot, see LOGBOOK under the topics SESSION_LEADER and PI. Shots 1-29 were at 800 kA. Shots 30-32 were at 1.0 MA. Shots meritting further analysis, including the 4 PEP mode shots, are marked with a *. # ? Details (A=A size, B=B size pellet; NL04 is value before 1st pellet) -- - --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01 - No pellet - test 02 - No pellet - test 03 - No pellet - test 04 - No pellet - 05 - No pellet - 06 B @ 0.672, RF @ 0.70 (slow rise) No PEP. NL04=1.12 07 A @ 0.695. Fizzle. Nice pellet though 08 A @ 0.695. RF @ 0.70. Bad pellet - didn't make it. No PEP. NL04=1.10 09 B @ 0.649, B @ 0.679. RF @ 0.7 (slow rise) No PEP. NL04=1.12 10 B @ 0.649, B @ 0.679, RF @ 0.7 (steeper) No PEP. NL04=1.18 11 B @ 0.659, B @ 0.679, RF @ 0.70. No PEP. NL04=1.24. 2nd pellet cruddy (Remainder of shots will all have RF coming on at 0.70 s.) 12 B @ 0.690, B @ 0.709, RF trip. No PEP. Both bad pellets. NL04=1.35 13 B @ 0.695, B @ 0.705. 2nd pellet didn't make it. NL04=1.36 14 B @ 0.695, A @ 0.705. No 2nd pellet. RF trip. NL04=1.39 No PEP. 15 * A @ 0.680, B @ 0.695. Disruption after RF. PEP-like RF trippy. 2nd pellet right in. NL04=1.37. Rdd,max=3.3e12 16 * A @ 0.680, B @ 0.695. Disruption after RF. Repeat of 15. RF better. 17 - Fiducial shot - 18 - Dud - 19 B @ 0.645, A @ 0.695. Another density disruption. NL04=1.25 20 B @ 0.595, A @ 0.695. Yet another density disruption. NL04=1.1 21 A @ 0.695 - bad pellet (didn't reach plasma) 22 * PEP MODE! A @ 0.695 s. Rdd,max=3.3e13. RF trip. NL04=1.34 23 C @ 0.630, A @ 0.695 - A was bad (fragments). NL04=1.3 24 another attempt of 23 - A still bad. NL04=1.3 25 C @ 0.625, A @ 0.695 - A bad (no pellet) NL04=1.2 26 * C @ 0.625, A @ 0.695 - different barrel for A, still bad. NL04=1.2 This shot has only one pellet reaching plasma (size C). RF comes on over 50 ms after the pellet, and Rdd reaches almost 1.0e13. This could be a weak PEP mode - the smaller size of the pellet being offset by the later timing of the RF. 27 * C @ 0.625, C @ 0.685, B @ 0.695 - density disruption, but indications of PEP mode 28 * PEP MODE! C @ 0.685, B @ 0.695. Rdd,max=3.0e13. NL04=1.3 29 * PEP MODE! C @ 0.670, B @ 0.680. Rdd,max=2.0e13. NL04=1.3 30 * PEP MODE! same timing as 29. RF trip. Rdd,max=2.3e13. NL04=1.3 31 attempt to repeat 30 - RF trip again. Snake - pellet didn't go all the way. NL04=1.3 32 - fizzle - - Jeff Schachter |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:36:55:583PM |
| Author: To Be Determined |
| Physics operator summary for 951212 EO: Silva/Bertolino PO: Goetz SL: Schachter Run 951212 was in support of Mini-Proposal #123A - PEP Mode with D2 Pellets. The goal of this run is to optimize PEP conditions. Program for this run: - Set up a diverted shot with Ip=0.8MA, Bt=5.3T, and NL_04=1.5e20. - Vary pre-pellet density - Vary size of pellet - Vary number of pellets - Vary timing of pellets relative to RF See the session leader's summary for a report on this program. Some things discovered today: 1) Very reliable startup today. Very good current rises and low impurity levels. A 'strong' fizzle and a fizzle at the end of the day were all the non-plasmas. Only one plasma had a hesitation in the current rise and the fastest rise seen was 76kA in 20msec. Pressures at breakdown were 2.0-2.2e-5 (10^logp_fport) with the fizzle on shot 032 being at a pressure of 1.5e-5. Disruption recovery was good today, except possibly for shot 032 which followed a high current (0.86MA) disruption. 2) Deuterium pellets were fired successfully today. Troubles with large pellets are being investigated. PEP mode was observed. Many density disruptions observed today. Record C-Mod densities measured today, with the central YAG channel being saturated even with a reduced entrance iris. 3) Feedback of the radial position using the RF loading worked well today. A contribution of -2000 in RCUR was satisfactory. 4) Nitrogen was being leaked into the machine through the divertor gas puff system. The background was building up throughout the morning and finally large levels after shot 014, 015 and 016 initiated an investigation. Pumping out the plenum after shot 020 returned the background level to the early morning value. It appears that the leak must be a through leak on a valve. This will be checked. 5) Nitrogen levels are NOT the important 'knob' for breakdown. Even with a partial pressure of 10^-7, plasmas were made with good current rises. Engineering, computing, and diagnostics today: Engineering tests were performed on shots 001-003 to check the repaired TF comm fault board and to do the OH resistance measurements. The repaired TF board works as no crowbars occured today. One TF resistance shutdown DUD occured. CAMAC errors were very minimal today. The YAG calibration is not good for the change in iris that was necessary with the density obtained with D pellets. Scorecard: 32 shots = 26 plasmas + 2 fizzles + 3 tests + 1 dud Shot summary for Run 951212: Load segment 1 of 951207025 Load segment 2 of 951129023 Match across segments by: RCUR = 0.653 IP = -500000A V_OH1 = 150V and remove switch closing spike V_EF2's = 100V coldstart hybrid - all matrices respond engineering changes made on 951211: EF4 cross-over time reduced by 35msec TF fault monitoring board repaired and included in the logic EF2's now have firmer current limits - they will not exceed their current limit of 4KA as in the past Fuses and SCRs replaced in EF4 Shot change result ____ _____ ______ 1 eng. test shot for TF no crowbar 2 eng. test shot for OH no OH 3 eng. test shot for OH resistances o.k. 4 see above plasma - all the way down good startup - CII light < .008 density not at target 5 add volts to PG3 in seg. 2 plasma - all the way down NL_04 still not at target 6 draw NL_04 up earlier; match plasma - all the way down - D pellet ZCUR across segments 7 -2000 in the RF loading field strong fizzle - .04MA - Br jump @ .015 in RCUR 8 BR_0 offset = .0064 (was .007) plasma - all the way down - excellent startup; RF feedback worked 9 stairstep RCUR D gain in seg1 plasma - all the way down - two small pellets and RF 10 draw NL_04 up sooner plasma - all the way down - current rise a little slower - P_0=1.2e-5 NL_04=1.2e20 pre-pellet 11 draw NL_04 up sooner and more plasma - all the way down - NL_04=1.25 V on PG3; remove 1msec of pre-pellet prefill puff 12 NL_04=1.5e20 @ 0.3 - move plasma - disr. @ 1.2; NL_04=1.35e20; pellets later no RF (mis-tune) 13 NL_04=1.5e20 @ .275; plasma - disr. @ 1.15; NL_04=1.35e20; 14 no changes plasma - disr. @ 1.16; NL_04=1.4e20 15 no changes plasma - disr. @ 0.75; got two pellets in; RF feedback probably killed it because of high density 16 RF_LOAD_E=-1500 in RCUR plasma - disr. @ 0.72; got two pellets; near the G limit; probably not RF feedback that killed the last two 17 load 951207025 for fiducial plasma - all the way down; even an H-mode; Zeff near 1. 18 load 951212016; no RF position DUD - TF magnet resistance fault feedback; pellets further apart 19 try again plasma - disr. @ 0.73; bit of hesitation RF feedback cleared 20 no changes; lower divertor plasma - disr. @ 0.76; good current rise plenum pumped out - through leak in the system 21 no changes; only one pellet plasma - disr. @ 1.21; pellet didn't make the plasma; good current rise 22 no changes; only one pellet plasma - disr. @ 1.20; best neuts; short PEP H-mode 23 RF_LOAD_E=-2000 (in RCUR) and plasma - disr. @ 1.19; 2nd pellet turn on pos. feedback didn't penetrate very well 24 no changes plasma - disr. @ 1.20; two little pellets - no PEP 25 no changes plasma - disr. @ 1.19; one little pel 26 no changes plasma - disr. @ 1.20; one little pel 27 two med. pellets plasma - disr. @ 0.74; three pel; PEP 28 just two pellets plasma - disr. @ 1.23; PEP; H-mode later 29 pellets earlier in time plasma - disr. @ 1.32; PEP; 3 ELM-free H-modes 30 draw IP=-1000000 plasma - disr. @ 1.27; Ip=1.0MA; short PEP - RF trips 31 no changes plasma - disr. @ 1.08; short PEP; RF trips out 32 no changes; only D-Port ant. fizzle - bouncer - P_0=1.5e-5 |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Dec 12 1995 09:40:21:960AM | 951212006 | Jeff Schachter | Barrel # 2. Fire at 0.66 s. RF at 0.70 s. No feedback.
Rdd ~ 1e13. Pellet didn't get to center (got as far as 70 cm). Not a very peppy shot. Will try bigger pellet. |
| Dec 12 1995 09:51:45:440AM | 951212007 | Jeff Schachter | Barrel # 1. Fire at 0.665 s. RF at 0.70 s. No feedback.
Fizzle. Try same again (with feedback on RF). |
| Dec 12 1995 10:06:15:810AM | 951212008 | Jeff Schachter | Barrel # 1. Fire at 0.665 s. RF at 0.70 s. With feedback.
Not very peppy. Trackers didn't work, so can't tell how far in it got. Same prepellet density as shot 6. Nice H-Mode. |
| Dec 12 1995 10:30:29:470AM | 951212009 | Jeff Schachter | Barrel # 6 at 0.635, # 2 at 0.665 s. RF at 0.70 s.
Not very peppy. 1st pellet raised density for 2nd, but spacing was far enough apart to allow partial reheat. |
| Dec 12 1995 01:11:05:130PM | 951212010 | Jeff Schachter | Barrel # 6 at 0.635, # 2 at 0.665 s. RF at 0.70 s.
Still not peppy. 2nd pellet is not giving big density rise, nor is it reaching close to the center. |
| Dec 12 1995 01:11:06:460PM | 951212010 | Jeff Schachter | Barrel # 6 at 0.635, # 2 at 0.665 s. RF at 0.70 s.
Still not peppy. 2nd pellet is not giving big density rise, nor is it reaching close to the center. |
| Dec 12 1995 01:12:17:750PM | 951212011 | Jeff Schachter | Barrel # 6 at 0.635, # 18 at 0.665 s. RF at 0.70 s.
Still not peppy. Same problems as last shot. 18 is a bad pellet. |
| Dec 12 1995 01:14:23:120PM | 951212012 | Jeff Schachter | Barrel # 6 at 0.675, # 18 at 0.695 s. RF at 0.70 s.
Moved closer to RF. RF tripped out. |
| Dec 12 1995 01:16:03:790PM | 951212013 | Jeff Schachter | Barrel # 6 at 0.680, # 10 at 0.695 s. RF at 0.70 s.
#10 didn't make it. Not peppy. Try a bigger pellet next. |
| Dec 12 1995 01:16:29:450PM | 951212014 | Jeff Schachter | Barrel # 6 at 0.680, # 1 at 0.695 s. RF at 0.70 s.
#1 didn't make it. RF power trip. |
| Dec 12 1995 01:19:23:480PM | 951212015 | Jeff Schachter | Barrel # 1 at 0.665, # 6 at 0.680 s. RF at 0.70 s.
Back away from RF. #1 worked!!! #6 penetrated to the center BIG density rise. Disruption after 2nd pellet - was it the RF feedback, or the G limit? |
| Dec 12 1995 01:23:52:210PM | 951212016 | Jeff Schachter | Barrel # 1 at 0.665, # 6 at 0.680 s. RF at 0.70 s.
Another BIG density rise, followed by disruption. Rdd giving indications that it would have been big - beginnings of PEP? Nice snake. |
| Dec 12 1995 01:24:18:040PM | 951212017 | Jeff Schachter | Fiducial Shot. No pellets. Got a plasma. Yeah.
|
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Dec 12 1995 08:23:28:150AM | John Goetz | Run 951212 - MiniProposal #123A (PEP Mode with D2 Pellets)
Goal: Optimize PEP conditions by maximizing pellet penetration Plan: Diverted plasma with Ip=0.8MA, Bt=5.3T, and nl_04=1.5e20 Vary pre-pellet density Vary pellet size Vary number of pellets fired before RF Vary timing of pellets relative to the RF time | |
| Dec 12 1995 08:26:20:330AM | John Goetz | Run 951212 - MiniProposal #123A (PEP Mode with D2 Pellets)
Setup: Load segment 1 from 951207025 (fiducial startup) Load segment 2 from 951129023 Match segments by: RCUR = 0.653 in segment 2 IP = -500000A @ 0.1sec in segment 2 V_OH1 = 150V @ 0.1sec in segment 2 and remove switch closing spike V_EF2's = 100V @ 0.1sec Coldstart hybrid - all matrices respond | |
| Dec 12 1995 08:28:10:590AM | John Goetz | Run 951212:
Engineering changes made on 951211 1.EF4 cross-over time reduced by 35msec 2.TF fault monitoring board repaired and included again in the logic 3.EF2 upper and lower now have firmer current limits - they will not exceed their current limit of 4KA as in the past 4.Fuses and SCRs replaced in EF4 | |
| Dec 12 1995 08:33:16:810AM | 951212001 | John Goetz | Shot 951212001:
TF test shot to check new comm board Results: no crowbar |
| Dec 12 1995 08:44:54:320AM | 951212002 | John Goetz | Shot 951212002:
OH test shot to check resistances Results: no OH |
| Dec 12 1995 08:48:53:610AM | 951212003 | John Goetz | Shot 951212003:
OH test shot to check resistances Results: resistance o.k. |
| Dec 12 1995 09:07:46:240AM | 951212004 | John Goetz | Shot 951212004:
see null entry Results: Plasma - all the way down good startup - CII < .008 didn't reach target density |
| Dec 12 1995 09:23:20:100AM | 951212005 | John Goetz | Shot 951212005:
add some volts to PG3 in segment 2 to help with density Results: plasma - all the way down NL_04 = 1e20 when the plasma goes into H-mode |
| Dec 12 1995 09:37:23:630AM | 951212006 | John Goetz | Shot 951212006:
draw NL_04 higher, sooner match ZCUR across segments Results: plasma - all the way down D pellet in |
| Dec 12 1995 09:56:02:400AM | 951212007 | John Goetz | Shot 951212007:
bigger pellet type -2000 in the RF loading field in RCUR - but no feedback yet Results: strong fizzle makes it to .04MA and then it hits something Br jump at around .015sec |
| Dec 12 1995 10:09:55:130AM | 951212008 | John Goetz | Shot 951212008:
Br_0 offset = .0064 (was .007) RF feedback on Results: plasma - all the way down excellent current rise pressure at breakdown = 2.0e-5 RF feedback works fine but a slushy pellet |
| Dec 12 1995 10:25:08:210AM | 951212009 | John Goetz | Shot 951212009:
stairstep on the D gain for RCUR in first 50msec to remove thrash in OH1 Results: plasma - all the way down OH1 voltage thrash still there, but different in character two D pellets in - RF stays on |
| Dec 12 1995 10:38:30:380AM | 951212010 | John Goetz | Shot 951212010:
draw NL_04 up sooner Results: plasma - all the way down breakdown pressure = 2.2e-5; slightly slower current rise NL_04 = 1.2e20 pre-pellet |
| Dec 12 1995 10:51:55:600AM | 951212011 | John Goetz | Shot 951212011:
draw NL_04 up sooner and more V on PG3 remove 1 msec from prefill puff Results: plasma - all the way down NL_04 = 1.25e20 pre-pellet (and rising) |
| Dec 12 1995 11:05:27:370AM | 951212012 | John Goetz | Shot 951212012:
draw NL_04 even earlier (asking for 1.5e20 @ 0.3sec) move pellets later (to get higher density) Results: plasma - disruption at 1.2sec nice current rise - P_0 = 2.0e-5 NL_04 = 1.35e20 pre-pellet; no RF |
| Dec 12 1995 11:23:09:490AM | 951212013 | John Goetz | Shot 951212013:
NL_04 asking for 1.5e20 @ 0.275sec Results: plasma - disrupts @ 1.15sec NL_04 = 1.35e20 pre-pellet second pellet doesn't make the plasma - third pellet is a little, bitty thing |
| Dec 12 1995 11:41:38:360AM | 951212014 | John Goetz | Shot 951212014:
no changes Results: plasma - disrupts @ 1.16 NL_04 = 1.4e20 pre-pellet one transmitter tripped out second pellet (big pellet didn't go again) |
| Dec 12 1995 11:57:36:640AM | 951212015 | John Goetz | Shot 951212015:
no changes Results: plasma - disrupts @ 0.75 - many mini-disruptions finally got the pellets in it appears that RF feedback killed this one because of the high density |
| Dec 12 1995 01:19:50:100PM | 951212016 | John Goetz | Shot 951212016:
lower RF_LOAD_E in RCUR to -1500 Results: plasma - disrupts @ 0.72 density near the Greenwald limit the last two shots were probably not RF feedback deaths |
| Dec 12 1995 01:31:36:410PM | 951212017 | John Goetz | Shot 951212017:
long break because of high partial pressure of mass 28 load 951207025 for fiducial Results: plasma - all the way down H-mode during the 2MW pulse Zeff near 1. |
| Dec 12 1995 01:41:48:270PM | 951212018 | John Goetz | Shot 951212018:
load 951212016 and begin the run again no RF position feedback pellets further apart in time Results: DUD TF magnet resistance fault |
| Dec 12 1995 01:56:46:020PM | 951212019 | John Goetz | Shot 951212019:
try again Results: plasma - disrupts @ 0.73 slight hesitation in current rise RF feedback cleared as disruption cause |
| Dec 12 1995 02:14:57:340PM | 951212020 | John Goetz | Shot 951212020:
no changes first pellet earlier Results: plasma - disrupts @ 0.76 two pellets - over the G limit - 1e21 ne0 many disruptions before the last one |
| Dec 12 1995 02:59:43:100PM | 951212020 | John Goetz | Shot 951212020:
LOWER_DIVERTOR plenum pumped out mass 28 drops precipitously on the RGA -> must be a through leak in the system somewhere |
| Dec 12 1995 02:23:37:170PM | 951212021 | John Goetz | Shot 951212021:
no changes only one pellet Results: plasma - disrupts @ 1.21 nice current rise pellet didn't make the plasma |
| Dec 12 1995 02:37:28:420PM | 951212022 | John Goetz | Shot 951212022:
no changes only one pellet Results: plasma - disrupts @ 1.20 PEP H-mode best neutron production so far |
| Dec 12 1995 02:52:31:380PM | 951212023 | John Goetz | Shot 951212023:
RF_LOAD_E = -2000 (in RCUR) and turn on the position feedback Results: plasma - disrupts @ 1.19 two small pellets; 2nd pellet didn't penetrate |
| Dec 12 1995 03:02:56:840PM | 951212024 | John Goetz | Shot 951212024:
no changes Results: plasma - disrupts @ 1.20 two little pellets again - RF solid - no PEP |
| Dec 12 1995 03:14:11:750PM | 951212025 | John Goetz | Shot 951212025:
no changes Results: plasma - disr. @ 1.19 only one pellet and a slush ball RF much more reliable than the PI today |
| Dec 12 1995 03:26:29:860PM | 951212026 | John Goetz | Shot 951212026:
no changes Results: plasma - disrupts at 1.20 only one pellet |
| Dec 12 1995 03:42:58:170PM | 951212027 | John Goetz | Shot 951212027:
two medium pellets at nearly the same time Results: plasma - disr. @ 0.74 got 3 pellets PEP mode (no H) |
| Dec 12 1995 03:53:47:200PM | 951212028 | John Goetz | Shot 951212028:
try for two medium pellets at nearly the same time Results: plasma - disr. @ 1.23 got the two pellets and a PEP mode; H-mode much later |
| Dec 12 1995 04:06:17:760PM | 951212029 | John Goetz | Shot 951212029:
move pellets earlier Results: plasma - disrupts @ 1.32 ( almost made it down ) PEP, then ELM-free H modes |
| Dec 12 1995 04:22:46:220PM | 951212030 | John Goetz | Shot 951212030:
draw IP = -1000000 Results: plasma - Ip = 1.0MA - disrupts @ 1.27 short PEP; RF tripped out |
| Dec 12 1995 04:42:58:610PM | 951212031 | John Goetz | Shot 951212031:
no changes Results: plasma - disrupts @ 1.08 short PEP; RF tripped out |
| Dec 12 1995 05:09:32:450PM | 951212032 | John Goetz | Shot 951212032:
no changes only D-Port antenna Results: fizzle - bouncer P_0 = 1.5e-5 fields look the same as 031 must have waited too long |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 08:23:53:940AM | Test | Ok | tftest |
| 2 | 08:35:15:010AM | Test | Bad | nothing fired |
| 3 | 08:43:46:730AM | Test | Ok | |
| 4 | 08:56:10:410AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 09:10:37:860AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 09:25:08:100AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 09:41:56:760AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 09:58:50:680AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 10:14:12:350AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 10:28:22:580AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 10:42:04:430AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 10:56:48:480AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 11:12:23:370AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 11:28:53:800AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 11:42:50:170AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 12:02:02:690PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 01:22:52:720PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 01:37:19:340PM | Plasma | Bad | mag res fault |
| 19 | 01:47:39:330PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 02:03:43:390PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 02:15:35:180PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 02:27:39:360PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 02:41:39:780PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 02:54:26:400PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 03:06:24:540PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 03:19:26:120PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 03:32:07:320PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 03:43:58:610PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 03:57:21:260PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 30 | 04:13:31:750PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 31 | 04:32:53:310PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 32 | 05:00:03:440PM | Plasma | Ok | |