| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Steve Wukitch |
| Physics operator(s): | Steve Wolfe |
| Engineering operator(s): | Vinny Bertolino,Bill Cochran |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| mp 148 |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:17:240PM |
| Author: To Be Determined |
| Continue conditioning and testing of the antenna (MP148 80 MHz RF conditioning and testing). E-port (FMIT#2) transmitted up to 1.6 MW yesterday (971104), but D-port (FMIT#1) appears to have had a malfunctioning fault protection circuit. The position feedback was briefly tested yesterday. The goal today is to: 1.) investigate FMIT#1 problem 2.) check position feedback 3.) RF conditioning 4.) power calibration Plasmas will be typical 5.4 T, 0.8 MA, D(H) heated discharges. This run was fairly successful. The D-Port malfunctioning fault protection circuit appears to have correct itself (the circuit was tested last night and no problems were found, but it worked when D-Port was started this morning). The position feedback was working from 971105019 on and appears to be functioning properly. Good progress was made in conditioning the RF (5 discharges in excess of 2.5 MW), but were inconsistent in delivering power from both transmitters simultaneously. The power calibration for the BiRa (MW->V) were performed as well and were entered into the RF tree. The H/H+D, determined by the U. of Maryland spectroscopy group (Welsh and Weaver), is about 2% before the RF and climbs to about 4% during RF for 971105018. The other discharges were thought to be similar and further analysis is being done to determine the concentration of H. The conditioning goal is 2.5 MW reliably from both transmitters. When reached, the RF will be characterized as conditioned. PRF(D/E) PFor(D/E) ST1 PS1 ST2 PS2 001 loaded the tune from 971104029 565 439 2380 1064 fizzle 002 dud 003 magnet resistance fault 004 plasma disrupt@0.65 sec 005 moved timing to .4 from .65 (D-Port .4-.85 and E-Port .85-1.1) dud 006 dud 007 fizzle 008 fizzle 009 fizzle 010 plasma D-Port ran (PRF D/E) 100 kW/600 kW 011 fizzle 539 439 2305 1105 012 plasma (PRF D/E) 0.75/1.4 MW by themselves changed timing -- D-Port: .4-.7 E-Port: .7-.95 Both .96-1.25 not very successful running together 013 fizzle 014 fizzle 015 plasma -- good PRF ramps on both and they ran better together each transmitter set a new record for forward power 016 fizzle 573 432 2305 1105 017 plasma E-Port is overpowering D-Port, but they ran longer together 018 plasma 019 fizzle turned the position feedback circuit on 020 fizzle 021 plasma transmitters ran together -- ramped to over 2 MW 022 changed timing D&E-Port run .7-1.25 s and retuned PRF 2.6 MW 583 423 2395 1040 023 fizzle 024 PRF 2.7 MW 587 413 2423 1036 E-Port is now the more sensitive of the pair and is tripping off 025 plasma PRF 3 MW; continued tripping on E-port 026 plasma PRF 2.8 MW; continued tripping H/H+D is about 2% before the RF and climbs to about 4% during RF for 971105018 027 plasma E-Port continues trip 580 428 028 programmed the outer gap to be smaller by 6 mm previous gap is close 1 cm D-port ran but probably is the reason E-Port did not run 029 power test timing on D-port is .85-1.25 s with E-port unchanged |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:36:58:050PM |
| Author: To Be Determined |
| Physics Operator Summary for Wed. 971105 SL: Wukitch PO: wolfe EO: Bertolino,Cochrane Run Plan for Wednesday, 971105 MP 148 -- Continue conditioning 80 MHz ICRF Engineering setup for Wednesday, 05 Nov 1997: Two hours of ECDC in deuterium before the run, if possible. Engineering setup as on 971104030, with TF under hybrid control Gas setup - fill K-side with 20 PSI of D2, hybrid enable fill B-top with 6 PSI of D2, hybrid enable fill B-side-lower with 4 PSI of Ar, hybrid enable The following gate valves should be enabled, assuming no vacuum problems: ECE (no others until we verify the status of each system) Plan: ----- We will start from 971104030 (not shot 31 which had RF feedback on RCUR turned on). The goal will be to get the D-port antenna operating at close to full power, and to get the two antennas operating together. We also need to get the loading position feedback (RF_LOAD_E) operating correctly. Hopefully we will get some decent H-modes for physics analysis along the way. If things go extremely well with the RF, we will move into MP188, pedestal studies. Results: -------- The goals were approached, but not fully met. The antennas ran together at up to 2.8MW, but not reliably. More work needs to be done tomorrow. At the higher powers we got ELM-free and type 3 Elmy discharges, with rather low H-factors. The highest WMHD was in the 120kJ range. The run got off to a very frustrating start. The startup appears to be a bistable system, with the same programming giving different results on BR and apparently on Bz as well. Yesterday, Bob tuned up state 2, for which appropriate settings are BR offset=.007T and EF4=-1335A. After some oscillations today we ended up in state 1, similar to Joe's run last Thursday, for which the corresponding settings (today) are .003T and -1430A. Once the proper programming was set, a fair shot reliability was obtained with minor tuning. Unfortunately, getting the above settings today took until shot#12. It is not at all clear what is responsible for the state change. Today we first saw it (2->1) after a change in EF4 programming (shot 2) and then back (1->2) after resetting the EF4 program for shot 3, and then again (2->1) after a disruption on shot 4. After the disruption it stayed in state 1 for the remainder of the run. I was suspicious that the hybrid gains or offsets might be changing somehow, but there does not seem to be any evidence for this (some comments about offsets in the logbook are in fact based on faulty logic; in fact the changes in the early-time baseline are exactly what we should expect for the change in offset.) Shots from the last part of today's run have satisfactory startups for what I've called state 1. If we should experience a jump to state 2, I recommend loading a segment 1 from 971104030. There was no repetition of the large frequent spikes on the hybrid output noted yesterday. There may have been a few sparse examples of spikes, but there was no evidence these had any effect and may have been due to input noise. Power supplies ran well except for shot 28, which had a repetition of the anomalous tf behavior as on 970625020: cabinet 1 got a very noisy shunt current feedback signal and caused substantial current ripple. The resulting bus vibration was clearly audible in the control room. As in June, exhaustive examination of the supply found nothing, and a subsequent PLC 100kA TF test was fine. It was noted that the air blower for the TF bus had come loose, causing the bus to get hot. I suspect the cabinet 1 problem may be related to something getting hot, since it has happened twice near the end of runs with a number of long tf pulses. Scorecard: --------- 14 plasmas 9 fizzles 5 duds (1 from magnet resistance fault) 1 test -- 29 shots Pre-Run Setup: --------- Load 971104030 and coldstart - successful Took a hybrid test shot - looks ok ECDC was carried out as requested. The sparker died during yesterday's run (after 22), and was repaired last night TCI had a H2O problem last night and was repaired this morning. Frank has put the EF4 coils on 25% cool to try to get them dead cold by the time we start. Just before ready to start, we had a computer network problem. JUKBOX and across the street nodes went down; we got NETWORK Partner exited warnings on sessions connected to MDSPlus. Tom and Henry fixed it. Engineers had a problem closing the air switch; there was a valve in the wrong position. Shot Log: --------- 1 Start like 971104030 fizzle. bd at 6.7msec. Increase EF4 from -1335 to -1320A Note: there may be a couple of spikes on hybrid outputs. 2 dud. huge +ve radial field and too much Bz. Put EF4 back where it was. 3 dud magnet resistance fault; no 13.8 supplies There is a single spike on the hybrid PID outputs at .113sec this time 4 plasma - disrupts at .6sec. Looks like a brick. bd better; jump in br around 2msec 5 no changes; see how it recovers from disruption dud. Now we've got Br at 5mT !! and Bz at +7mT. OH2 currents are different by nearly a kA! EF4 current is also different by 80A. Hybrid A-out signals show similar errors from 4 and 5?? Just repeat again and see if it does the same; there's been a 20 minute wait while I stare at traces. 6 dud. same thing, huge radial field. NOw try dropping the br offset 7 BR offset from .007 to .003 dud. Br is better, but there is too much Bz; EF4 rog is still at -1270 8 IC_EF4 from -1335 to -1390 fizzle- bd at 6msec. Bz still a little too positive EF4U rogowski reads -1335 9 IC_EF4 from -1390 to -1400 fizzle; got -1345A on EF4 got to 50kA Note: If I look at the DC level on BR0 on shot 5 at -1.3 sec (before the shot) it is +4mT. On shot 8 it was 0. On the EF4 trace, on shot 5 the error on IC_EF4 was -26A, while on shot it is the same. 10 Up EF4 again from -1400 to -1415 plasma- lasts to 1.46 sec. bd at 5msec, no hesitation, bz is low until 10msec rf = 100kW on D, 600kW on E. 11 No changes. Will it repeat or change state again? fizzle, bd at 6msec 12 IC_EF4 from -1415 to -1430 plasma till 1.44 sec only a small field difference, some hesitation between 10-15msec 1.5MW from E-port, they wouldn't run together dithering h-mode around .9 sec 13 no changes another fizzle! 14 play gashead for a while; drop prepuff from 18 to 15msec fizzle. So much for gas tweaks Note that IC_EF4 is really the average EF4 current 15 Drop RCUR offset from 7000 to 5000 in segment 1 plasma to 1.45 sec rf up to 2MW; running together at lower power late in pulse It's not clear the RCUR tweak did anything to the initial rise. 16 Repeat. disruption at .45 sec check-mag reports a baseline offset on bp26_bc; it's really dead BP26_bc is not used by hybrid or processed data, so that's ok. Disruption was called by a brick at 0.38sec, before the RF went down; about 125kA of halo current. 17 Just repeat, see if the hybrid has jumped offsets again. plasma to 1.44sec RF got to 1.8MW (E-port); "Oh, they came up together without tripping out"- S. Wukitch 18 No change- plasma to 1.45sec RF close to 2MW 19 Turn on RF_LOAD feedback gain at -1500 fizzle. 4 in a row is as good as it gets? 20 Try to get rid of hesitation. I'm not sure which way to tweak, try slowing down Bz a little. Raise V_oh1 at 7msec from 60V to 100V, and at 8msec from 20 ->60V No OH2 tweak, they are already going up. fizzle. MAybe it was the wrong way? 21 Put V_oh1 back. Increase V_ef3 from 2600->2800 at -.001 plasma to 1.41 sec current rise is much faster, but still has a slight hesitation between 8 and 12msec; hard to actually see much difference on the EF3 voltage Get around 1.5MW, got several H-modes, elm-free from .83 to .85sec 22 Keep ZXL down at end of pulse plasma to 1.44sec, no change in end of pulse No hesitation this time rf =2.6MW; h-mode from .76 to .99sec; ~100kJ, betaN~.85 23 Slow down CLEARIN ramp at end of pulse. fizzle. previous was best looking startup today, this one fizzles? Bz is maybe a little lower at 10msec and 20msec, same at 15msec 24 When in doubt, drop the fill (to 13msec); while I'm at it, shorten the Ar pulse by 3 msec plasma to 1.3 sec, pf crowbar at disruption. oh2l comm fault CLEARIN move was probably in the wrong direction. RF to 2.7MW, 2 h-modes until 1.02sec, over 100kJ current rise looks good, for now 25 Copy CLEARIN wire back in from 22 plasma to 1.44sec. JR requests lowering the Ar plenum pressure to 3 psi for next shot! Rf got up to 3MW, but trips earlier, get to 120kJ 26 Ar off for this shot. No other changes plasma to 1.64sec; sure the Ar doesn't hurt anything! RF peaks at 2.8MW, multiple h-modes, multiple rf faults Some runaways early, ECE sees signal across whole chamber 27 Ar puff back on at 3psi. Brian will poke the probe in at .48 and .68 I ought to do something about the runaways, but let's see what happens; plasma to 1.49sec. No runaways. RF only gets to 2.5MW, then faults. 28 Move RCUR out from .669 to .672; should decrease outer gap by 6mm. also ramp clearin down faster at end of pulse plasma to 1.46sec ***ripple on tf current, one cabinet goes berserk, like last June.*** only 1 transmitter (D-ran, E-didn't) 1.2MW Outer gap around 0.6cm Early runaways again. 29 100KA TF test under PLC control. |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Nov 5 1997 09:58:35:730AM | Steve Wukitch | Continue conditioning and testing of the antenna (MP148 80 MHz RF conditioning and testing). E-port (FMIT#2) transmitted up to 1.6 MW yesterday (971104), but D-port (FMIT#1) appears to have had a malfunctioning fault protection circuit. The position feedback was briefly tested yesterday. The goal today is to: 1.) investigate FMIT#1 problem 2.) check position feedback 3.) RF conditioning 4.) power calibration Plasmas will be typical 5.4 T, 0.8 MA, D(H) heated discharges. | |
| Nov 5 1997 03:16:33:170PM | Steve Wukitch | H/H+D is about 2% before the RF and climbs to about 4% during RF for 971105018 | |
| Nov 5 1997 09:57:48:390AM | 971105001 | Steve Wukitch | 001 fizzle loaded the tune from 971104029 [(ST1,PS1),(ST2,PS2)] [(565,439),(2380,1064)] |
| Nov 5 1997 10:22:25:620AM | 971105005 | Steve Wukitch | moved D-port RF start to .4 from .65 (D-Port is on from .4-.85 and E-Port runs .85-1.1) |
| Nov 5 1997 11:38:24:420AM | 971105010 | Steve Wukitch | plasma D-Port ran (PRF D/E) 100 kW/600 kW |
| Nov 5 1997 11:59:14:590AM | 971105012 | Steve Wukitch | plasma (PRF D/E) 0.75/1.4 MW by themselves changed timing -- D-Port: .4-.7 E-Port: .7-.95 Both .96-1.25 not very successful running together |
| Nov 5 1997 12:33:42:210PM | 971105015 | Steve Wukitch | plasma -- good PRF ramps on both and they ran better together |
| Nov 5 1997 01:01:48:220PM | 971105017 | Steve Wukitch | plasma -->E-Port is overpowering D-Port, but they ran longer together |
| Nov 5 1997 01:51:29:260PM | 971105021 | Steve Wukitch | plasma transmitters ran together -- ramped to over 2 MW |
| Nov 5 1997 02:06:44:830PM | 971105022 | Steve Wukitch | plasma changed timing D&E-Port run .7-1.25 s and retuned PRF = 2.6 MW |
| Nov 5 1997 02:39:14:200PM | 971105024 | Steve Wukitch | PRF 2.7 MW E-Port is now the more sensitive of the pair and is tripping off |
| Nov 5 1997 02:55:30:730PM | 971105025 | Steve Wukitch | plasma PRF 3 MW; continued tripping on E-port |
| Nov 5 1997 03:10:58:970PM | 971105026 | Steve Wukitch | plasma PRF 2.8 MW; continued tripping on D&E-port |
| Nov 5 1997 03:51:21:670PM | 971105028 | Steve Wukitch | programmed the outer gap to be smaller by 6 mm previous gap is close 1 cm D-port ran but probably is the reason E-Port did not run |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Nov 5 1997 07:17:10:400AM | Steve Wolfe | In PCS: Load_from 971104030 LOAD/CLEAN into model Load at 5-Nov-1997 07:08:20.00 HYBINIT_DISPATCH coldstart ok, both log files check out (still using old server/log file; cycle not started yet) | |
| Nov 5 1997 07:59:20:590AM | Steve Wolfe | Run Plan for Wednesday, 971105 MP 148 -- Continue conditioning 80 MHz ICRF SL: Wukitch PO: Wolfe Engineering setup for Wednesday, 05 Nov 1997: Two hours of ECDC in deuterium before the run, if possible. Engineering setup as on 971104030, with TF under hybrid control Gas setup - fill K-side with 20 PSI of D2, hybrid enable fill B-top with 6 PSI of D2, hybrid enable fill B-side-lower with 4 PSI of Ar, hybrid enable The following gate valves should be enabled, assuming no vacuum problems: ECE (no others until we verify the status of each system) Plan: ----- We will start from 971104030 (not shot 31 which had RF feedback on RCUR turned on). The goal will be to get the D-port antenna operating at close to full power, and to get the two antennas operating together. We also need to get the loading position feedback (RF_LOAD_E) operating correctly. Hopefully we will get some decent H-modes for physics analysis along the way. If things go extremely well with the RF, we will move into MP188, pedestal studies. | |
| Nov 5 1997 09:39:25:320AM | 971105001 | Steve Wolfe | Just before ready to start, we had a computer network problem. JUKBOX and across the street nodes went down; we got NETWORK Partner exited warnings on sessions connected to MDSPlus. First shot setup is a copy from 971104030 fizzle. bd at 6.7msec. Increase EF4 from -1335 to -1320A Note: there may be a couple of spikes on hybrid outputs. |
| Nov 5 1997 10:05:42:040AM | 971105002 | Steve Wolfe | shot 2: EF4 from -1335 to -1320 dud. huge +ve radial field and too much Bz. Put EF4 back where it was. |
| Nov 5 1997 10:05:10:430AM | 971105003 | Steve Wolfe | shot 3: EF4 from -1320 to -1335 again dud magnet resistance fault; no 13.8 supplies There is a single spike on the hybrid PID outputs at .113sec this time |
| Nov 5 1997 10:19:22:050AM | 971105004 | Steve Wolfe | shot 4: EF4 from -1320 to -1335 again plasma - disrupts at .6sec Looks like a brick. bd better; jump in br around 2msec |
| Nov 5 1997 10:43:04:470AM | 971105005 | Steve Wolfe | shot 5: No changes; see how it recovers from disruption dud. Now we've got Br at 5mT !! and Bz at +7mT. OH2 currents are different by nearly a kA! EF4 current is also different by 80A. Hybrid A-out signals show similar errors from 4 and 5?? Just repeat again and see if it does the same; there's been a 20 minute wait while I stare at traces. |
| Nov 5 1997 10:50:32:170AM | 971105006 | Steve Wolfe | shot 6: dud. same thing, huge radial field. NOw try dropping the br offset |
| Nov 5 1997 11:01:27:190AM | 971105007 | Steve Wolfe | shot 7: BR offset from .007 to .003 dud. Br is better, but there is too much Bz; EF4 rog is still at -1270 |
| Nov 5 1997 11:10:39:410AM | 971105008 | Steve Wolfe | shot 8: IC_EF4 from -1335 to -1390 fizzle- bd at 6msec. Bz still a little too positive EF4U rogowski reads -1335 |
| Nov 5 1997 11:22:08:120AM | 971105009 | Steve Wolfe | shot 9: IC_EF4 from -1390 to -1400 fizzle; got -1345A on EF4 got to 50kA Note: If I look at the DC level on BR0 on shot 5 at -1.3 sec (before the shot) it is +4mT. On shot 8 and 9 it was 0. On the EF4 trace, on shot 5 the error on IC_EF4 was -26A, while on shot it is the same. |
| Nov 5 1997 11:34:06:700AM | 971105010 | Steve Wolfe | shot 10: Up EF4 again from -1400 to -1415 plasma- lasts to 1.46 sec. bd at 5msec, no hesitation, bz is low until 10msec rf = 100kW on D, 600kW on E. |
| Nov 5 1997 11:47:32:830AM | 971105011 | Steve Wolfe | shot 11: No changes. Will it repeat or change state again? fizzle bd at 6msec Bz a little higher early. |
| Nov 5 1997 11:59:37:170AM | 971105012 | Steve Wolfe | shot 12: IC_EF4 from -1415 to -1430 plasma till 1.44 sec only a small field difference, some hesitation between 10-15msec 1.5MW from E-port, they wouldn't run together dithering h-mode around .9 sec |
| Nov 5 1997 12:09:16:560PM | 971105013 | Steve Wolfe | shot 13: no changes another fizzle! makes it to 45kA |
| Nov 5 1997 12:19:14:750PM | 971105014 | Steve Wolfe | shot 14:play gashead for a while; drop prepuff from 18 to 15msec fizzle. So much for gas tweaks Note that IC_EF4 is really the average EF4 current |
| Nov 5 1997 12:34:12:350PM | 971105015 | Steve Wolfe | shot 15: Drop RCUR offset from 7000 to 5000 in segment 1 plasma to 1.45 sec rf up to 2MW; running together at lower power late in pulse It's not clear the RCUR tweak did anything to the initial rise. |
| Nov 5 1997 12:50:43:780PM | 971105016 | Steve Wolfe | shot 16: repeat disruption at .45 sec check-mag reports a baseline offset on bp26_bc; it's really dead BP26_bc is not used by hybrid or processed data, so that's ok. Disruption was called by a brick at 0.38sec, before the RF went down; about 125kA of halo current. |
| Nov 5 1997 12:59:03:470PM | 971105017 | Steve Wolfe | shot 17:Just repeat, see if the hybrid has jumped offsets again. plasma to 1.44sec RF got to 1.8MW (E-port); "Oh, they came up together without tripping out"- S. Wukitch |
| Nov 5 1997 01:14:57:310PM | 971105018 | Steve Wolfe | shot 18:No change- plasma to 1.45sec RF close to 2MW |
| Nov 5 1997 01:26:09:440PM | 971105019 | Steve Wolfe | shot 19:Turn on RF_LOAD feedback gain at -1500 fizzle. 4 in a row is as good as it gets? |
| Nov 5 1997 01:37:58:340PM | 971105020 | Steve Wolfe | shot 20: Try to get rid of hesitation. I'm not sure which way to tweak, try slowing down Bz a little. Raise V_oh1 at 7msec from 60V to 100V, and at 8msec from 20 ->60V No OH2 tweak, they are already going up. fizzle. MAybe it was the wrong way? |
| Nov 5 1997 02:08:19:530PM | 971105021 | Steve Wolfe | shot 21:Put V_oh1 back. Increase V_ef3 from 2600->2800 at -.001 plasma to 1.41 sec current rise is much faster, but still has a slight hesitation between 8 and 12msec; hard to actually see much difference on the EF3 voltage Get around 1.5MW, got several H-modes, elm-free from .83 to .85sec |
| Nov 5 1997 02:07:54:060PM | 971105022 | Steve Wolfe | shot 22:Keep ZXL down at end of pulse plasma to 1.44sec, no change in end of pulse No hesitation this time rf =2.6MW; h-mode from .76 to .99sec; ~100kJ, betaN~.85 |
| Nov 5 1997 02:22:51:240PM | 971105023 | Steve Wolfe | shot 23 Slow down CLEARIN ramp at end of pulse. fizzle. previous was best looking startup today, this one fizzles? Bz is maybe a little lower at 10msec and 20msec, same at 15msec |
| Nov 5 1997 02:38:39:850PM | 971105024 | Steve Wolfe | shot 24: When in doubt, drop the fill (to 13msec); while I'm at it, shorten the Ar pulse by 3 msec plasma to 1.3 sec, pf crowbar at disruption. oh2l comm fault CLEARIN move was probably in the wrong direction. RF to 2.7MW, 2 h-modes until 1.02sec, over 100kJ current rise looks good, for now |
| Nov 5 1997 03:10:40:000PM | 971105025 | Steve Wolfe | shot 25: Copy CLEARIN wire back in from 22 plasma to 1.44sec. JR requests lowering the Ar plenum pressure to 3 psi for next shot! Rf got up to 3MW, but trips earlier, get to 120kJ |
| Nov 5 1997 03:11:06:070PM | 971105026 | Steve Wolfe | shot 26: Ar off for this shot. No other changes plasma to 1.64sec; sure the Ar doesn't hurt anything! RF peaks at 2.8MW, multiple h-modes, multiple rf faults Some runaways early, ECE sees signal across whole chamber |
| Nov 5 1997 03:26:20:820PM | 971105027 | Steve Wolfe | shot 27:Ar puff back on at 3psi. Brian will poke the probe in at .48 and .68 I ought to do something about the runaways, but let's see what happens; plasma to 1.49sec. No runaways. RF only gets to 2.5MW, then faults. |
| Nov 5 1997 03:42:46:060PM | 971105028 | Steve Wolfe | shot 28: Move RCUR out from .669 to .672; should decrease outer gap by 6mm. also ramp clearin down faster at end of pulse plasma to 1.46sec ***ripple on tf current, one cabinet goes berserk, like last June.*** only 1 transmitter (D-ran, E-didn't) 1.2MW Outer gap around 0.6cm |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 09:24:58:470AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 2 | 09:41:26:980AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 3 | 10:00:03:150AM | Plasma | Bad | mag resist fault |
| 4 | 10:08:23:200AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 5 | 10:20:05:780AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 10:43:51:730AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 10:52:20:280AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 11:03:05:660AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 11:12:07:270AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 10 | 11:26:14:380AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 11:39:10:160AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 11:51:41:290AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 12:05:06:720PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 12:14:14:710PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 12:24:09:590PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 12:38:32:420PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 12:51:48:820PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 01:02:27:940PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 01:16:46:610PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 01:29:07:690PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 01:40:02:800PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 01:58:41:440PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 02:13:40:970PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 02:27:27:340PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 02:44:18:610PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 02:59:54:220PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 03:17:35:080PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 03:32:25:620PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 05:05:46:200PM | Test | Ok | |