| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Bruce Lipschultz |
| Physics operator(s): | Steve Wolfe |
| Engineering operator(s): | Bill Cochran,Vinny Bertolino |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| mp 168 |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:17:773PM |
| Author: To Be Determined |
| run 980109 session leader: Bruce Lipschultz physop: Steve Wolfe engineering op: Vinnie Bertolino Mini-proposal 168: "Exploration of the Effect on Core Confinement of Different Impurities" This run was fairly successful. We did see a correlation between a degradation in confinement and the edge Te dropping with radiation. We still need to look at the emissivity profiles and look at the localization of the radiation at the edge with corresponding to the injected impurity (ReJean and John G.). We had difficulty reaching the Prad/Pin point of 70%. The plasma either disrupted out dropped out of H-mode. Amanda reported that her quick glance at the data indicated that the edge Te dropping was indicative of the pedestal width narrowing as opposed to the overall profile dropping everywhere. It appeared that the Te slope through the pedestal and in the core stayed fairly constant. One other surprise was that the injected impurities did not appear to be going into the divertor. This may have been due to the lateness of the injection and the relatively long time it takes for the divertor to reach equilibrium. However, during one shot where the plasma was primarily in L-mode (shot 31) the Kr levels in the divertor were much higher. The baseline shots for analysis are shots 12, 29 and 36 without injection (there may have been significant Ne or Kr around anyway). The Ne and Kr shots are 24 (50% Prad w/Ne), 27/28 (66% Prad/Pin with Ne), 37 (80% Prad/Pin for Kr) and 38 (66% Prad/Pin with Kr). The details follow: shot #1-4: Power tests shot #5: MARFE at the beginning (till about 0.45 sec) followed by a good EDA mode with 1.7 MW RF. No GPC, no injected impurities. shot #6: fizzle shot #7: fizzle shot #8: MARFE at the beginning followed by 2.1 MW of RF. BUT no H-mode and huge H-alpha during the RF. We get H-mode AFTER the RF turns off. Note also that the GPC was not calibrated properly for that shot and the Tes are low. shot #9: Went ok but no data - computer problem shot #10: fizzle shot #11: 2.2 MW of RF and EDA mode. Still increasing the RF power. Still no impurity puff. Divertor probes still trying to get the right gain settings so poor data. Significant recombination light at the outer divertor up to 0.8 seconds. There appears to be a density variation across the outer divertor profile looking at the line widths. shot #12: 2.5 MW of RF and EDA mode. No impurity puff. Divertor probes almost back. Baseline Prad/Pin about .4 shot #13: small amount of Ne (0.02 sec puff at 0.7 sec) had a slight effect on the 2Pi bolo. Need more Ne. shot #14: fizzle shot #15: fizzle shot #16: 2.5 MW & EDA mode. Ne increased to 0.03 sec width and triggered at 0.85. Prad/Pin ~ 0.5. Next shot we will do the TF sweep. shot #18: same shot but with TF sweep. There seems to be rearrangements in the ne, Te and rad power profiles? shot #19: Same again. Still getting a spatial profile for McPherson. JT says that he is able to identify the He-like Ne line which should give a better measure of the core density. shot #20: Same shot. The radiated power keeps changing from shot to shot, The rumour is that the profiles of density and Te are what is causing this. Goetz claims that the div. radiated power is not changing. Amanda's sweep shifted to earlier time. shot# 21: Larger Ne injection (60 ms). However, large Mo injection drops it out of H-mode. EDA returns with the larger Ne levels. shot #22: fizzle shot #23: fizzle shot #24: Great steady-state w/Ne. However the Prad/Pin is 50% still! Try for more Ne. shot #25: disrupts on the way down. Made it to Prad/Pin of 60%. 100 ms pulse starting at .8 sec. Next shot more. shot #26: dud (power supply) shot #27: 2.5 MW of radiation. Prad/Pin ~ 66%. But large ELM-like occurence in middle of shot (1.05 sec). Stay with this? shot #28: repeat of #27. shot #29: baseline shot, no Ne. However, big injection at 1.05 seconds. shot #30: 50 ms of Kr started at 0.8 seconds. It seems to get in at .845 and kills the H-mode at .87 seconds. Too much. We need to back off the Kr. shot #31: No H-mode until almost 0.9 seconds. Then we have an awful looking ELMy H-mode with a large amount of radiation. This may be coincident with a MARFE on the inner divertor. John finds that there is 3x the amount of Kr in the divertor during this shot (mostly L-mode) compared to 32. That is even with much less Kr injected -> H-mode causes the Kr compression to degrade. Shot #32: Short H-mode. Jim Terry reports that the Kr level was significant even before the puff. Then the puff knocked it out of H-mode. Prad/Pin ~0.66. shot #33: delayed H-mode. Kr puff only 20 ms. Still 2.7 MW in radiated power. shot #34: shot ended quickly due to 'brick. shot #35: still awful plasma (same Kr puff). shot #36: Kr off and TF sweep off. Shot fairly nice. shot #37: Kr on with 2 PSI and 20 ms puff. Got the H-mode. It starts to degrade at 1.09 seconds. 2.8 MW of radiated power (67% radiation). No TF sweep this shot. Significant loss in stored energy. shot #38: Shot same as 27. Got the TF sweep for Amanda as well. Almost 2.5 MW of radiated power. Amanda gets 2 sweeps, one during the hotter period and one later in the shot when there is more radiation. |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:36:58:537PM |
| Author: To Be Determined |
| Physop Summary for Friday, 980109 SL: Blip PO: wolfe EO: Bertolino,Cochran MP 168 Run Plan --------- This run is in support of MP#168, "Exploration of the Effect on Core Confinement of Different Impurities". Power tests will be conducted between 08:00 and 09:00, to investigate possible instability in the OH2 response which seems to be contributing to our vertical stability problems. Ian Hutchinson will serve as Session Leader for these tests. Engineering setup: ------------------ Two hours of ECDC in Deuterium prior to run. For power tests: TF under hybrid control, current limit and timing as on 980107025. Fizzle detector start moved late (1.5 sec) OH1,OH2U and OH2L under hybrid control. PLC Limits [-10,10], start=-.4sec, switch close=-0.2, open=+2 (no commutation), crowbar=2.1, invert=1.2sec. We will turn the supplies on one at a time. Gas puffs disabled. Plenums filled as indicated below. For plasma operation (first shot): Engineering setup as on 980107025, except TF current limit set to 183kA (approximately 6T+ headroom) TF under hybrid control Remember to set the fizzle detector back to .08 Gas setup - fill K-side with 30 PSI of D2, hybrid enable fill B-top with 6 PSI of D2, hybrid enable fill B-side-lower with 4 PSI of Kr, hybrid disabled fill J-bottom with 4 PSI of Ne hybrid disabled The following gases will be used during this run: D2,Neon,Argon,Krypton, and Nitrogen. These bottles are presently installed. Following the run the Neon bottle should be replaced with Helium for ECDC over the weekend and running Helium plasmas next Tuesday. ECE gate valve enabled; others if diagnosticians are ready. Power Tests: ----------- Start from previously prepared shot with OH's at -5000 amps, with an oscillating voltage waveform chirping from 40-120Hz (pcs$wolfe:pcs_999). Run OH1, OH2U, OH2L power supplies one at a time, then perhaps together. Run TF pulse for all cases to include effect of alternator loading. Look for resonances in response at some range of frequencies. Plasma Run: ----------- The goal of this run is to assess the effect of various impurity gases on global confinement. We will start from a target shot taken from 980107025, but with increased TF=5.7T to avoid cutoff of the ECE. The TF will be ramped up by 7.5kA (~5%) during the shot for ECE pedestal measurements on some shots (not the first). The initial seg2 is now setup in pcs$wolfe:pcs_999 (but segment 2 is turned off). The planned shot sequence is: (1) Setup of H-mode plasma (3-4 shots) (2) Injection of Ne to achieve Prad,main/PIN= 0.5. (J-bottom valve) (5 shots for scan of McPherson + 2-3 setup shots). (3) repeat (2) with Prad,main/PIN = 0.7 (5 shots). (4) Injection of Kr to evaluate relative effect on profiles (3 shots). (B-side lower). We may repeat steps 2 and 3 in Kr depending on results. Between shots without holding up sequence, pump out J-bottom and fill with N2 If time permits: (5) Injection of N to achieve Prad,main/PIN = 0.5. (J-bottom valve) (3 shots for scan of McPherson + 2-3 setup shots). (6) repeat (5) with Prad,main/PIN = 0.7 (5 shots). Results: ------- The power tests were carried out, but no smoking gun with respect to the oscillations on the OH supplies was found. Parts 1-4 of the run plan were completed. Confinement degradation was demonstrated with injected neon and krypton, and radiation profile and pedestal measurements were made. Two shots, #8 and #31, failed to go into H-mode with high input power levels, and seemed to have halpha signatures that looked like the RF pulse; there was speculation about this being a steady-state marfe in the vicinity of the inner nose. The fizzle rate was higher today. A BR tweak, increasing the RCUR offset to 8000, and adding 15amps to EF4 eventually gave a successful startup, but also gave late and somewhat variable breakdown times. Details: ------- Start PCS and confirm that the OH test shot is still loaded from last night. Did a coldstart and got an A-matrix not responding error! Re-tried the coldstart; worked ok this time. Don't know what was wrong the first time. The power tests were carried out on shots 1-4. #1-3 had TF plus OH2U, OH2L, and OH1, respectively. It was noted that the pre-loaded waveform actually went to 200Hz instead of 120Hz, as intended. Shot #2, with OH2l seemed to have a possible resonance at just above 40Hz. It looked like each supply exhibited gain of about 1.5 at low frequency and decreasing to nothing at higher frequency. No obvious instabilities were observed. Shot 3 was OH1 and the TF. The OH1 response seemed to role off faster than the OH2's. For shot 4 we changed the waveform to ramp f from 20Hz to 80Hz and ran the two OH2's with the TF. The supply response looked pretty much as expected, decreasing with f. No resonance or instability was observed. The first shot of the physics run was #5, which ran well with a long EDA reaching 145kJ with 1.7MW of RF. Unfortunately GPC was not turned on for this shot. TF was set at 160kA. Shots 6 and 7 were fizzles. It turned out the cooling valve for EF4 upper was not opening, so the EF4 coil imbalance was large and positive. Also the CII signal on these shots was large (.008 and .01). For Shot 8 adjusted Br offset from .006 to .0055. We got a full length plasma with over 2MW of RF, but it stayed in L-mode until the RF turned off, then went into H-mode. The H-alpha trace had a big square pulse that looked like the RF pulse. Shot 9 appeared to run well, and judging from the neutron noise on the TV had a long H-mode, but DAQA crashed right after the shot and all data was lost. For Shot 10 reduced the TF to 157kA, which should give 5.7T instead of 5.8T. Shot 10 fizzled. Shots 11 and 12 had good H-modes with increasing RF power, to 2.5MW and 160kJ on #12. Neon injection began with shot #13, with a 20msec pulse at 0.7 sec. #14-15 fizzled as we tried to increase the neon level and radiated power. For shot 16 I changed the IC_EF4 from -1345 to -1330 to increase the early Bz; this seemed to delay the breakdown but got a good plasma, with close to the desired Prad/Pin~0.5. Shot 17 fizzled. Because it looked like Bz was coming in too slowly, I started increasing the RCUR offset from 6300->7000->8000; this seemed to work. Shots 18-20 were a McPherson sweep, with TF waggles for ECE edge profiles. Shot #21 had increased neon. I had put the EF4 back to -1345 because I didn't like the late breakdown. While #21 worked, with early breakdown, it had a hesitation. I brought it back to -1335 for #22, but it fizzled, as did #23 which was back to -1330. For shot #24 I dropped the Br offset again, from .0055 to .005. Note that at some point in the EF4 changes I moved the last point on the flattop from -.003 to 0.0; this may have been a bad thing, as the thrashes after commutation seemed worse than earlier in the day. At any rate, with the Br at .005 and the EF4 at -1330, and RCUR offset = 8000, there were no further fizzles from #24-#38, although the breakdowns varied from 6.3 to 7.8 msec. Shot #26 was a power supply dud, with EF3 breaker pulling out with a forced shutdown before the pulse. Shots 24-28 had increasing neon levels trying to get to a radiated power fraction of 0.7. Shot #29 was a no-neon baseline shot. There was a suspicion that the TF sweep was somehow related to injections and eruptions from the antenna on some of these shots, typically at 1.0 to 1.1 sec. I believe this was a red herring, but we moved the sweep time and tried an in-and-out sweep, and also turned the sweep off for a couple of shots during the next sequence. See the logbook for what happened when. Shot 30-35, and 37-38 were krypton puff shots. The first try,#30, used a 50msec puff at 4psi, and this was clearly too much; it killed the H-mode almost immediately. Subsequent shots seemed to still have substantial Kr levels around even before the puff. Shot 31 was similar to #8 in that it stayed in L-mode until 0.9sec, with a flat H-alpha trace. Shot 36 was a no-puff (and no TF sweep) shot that got back to a long EDA, but with somewhat lower confinement, a stored energy of 147kj, compared to 160. Good Kr shots which stayed in H-mode but showed degrading comfinement during the pulse, were #37-38, with 20msec puff at 1.9psi. Shot #38 had a TF sweep starting at 0.9sec. After the run, John Goetz ran some puffs to calibrate the divertor RGA for Ne, Ar, and Kr. Tommy Toland then replaced the Helium bottle where the neon bottle had been. Helium ECDC is scheduled to take place over the weekend. Problems: --------- The first coldstart of the hybrid gave a "a-matrix not responding" error. Repeating the coldstart fixed it. We lost data from one shot (#9) to a DAQA crash. The EF3 breaker pulled before the shot on #26, causing a dud. Scorecard: ---------- Tests 4 Duds 1 (power supply) Fizzles 8 plasmas 25 (data lost on 1 due to DAQA crash) ======= == Total 38 |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Jan 9 1998 09:27:12:360AM | 980109005 | Bruce Lipschultz | MARFE at the beginning (till about 0.45 sec) followed by a good EDA mode with 1.7 MW RF. No GPC, no injected impurities. |
| Jan 9 1998 10:05:15:730AM | 980109008 | Bruce Lipschultz | MARFE at the beginning followed by 2.1 MW of RF. BUT no H-mode and huge H-alpha during the RF. We get H-mode AFTER the RF turns off. Note also that the GPC was not calibrated properly for that shot and the Tes are low |
| Jan 9 1998 10:51:04:550AM | 980109011 | Bruce Lipschultz | 2.2 MW of RF and EDA mode. Still increasing the RF power. Still no impurity puff. Significant recombination light at the outer divertor up to 0.8 seconds. There appears to be a density variation across the outer divertor profile looking at the stark line widths. |
| Jan 9 1998 11:07:17:890AM | 980109012 | Bruce Lipschultz | 2.5 MW of RF and EDA mode. No impurity puff. Divertor probes almost back. |
| Jan 9 1998 11:10:42:240AM | 980109013 | Bruce Lipschultz | small amount of Ne (0.02 sec puff at 0.7 sec) had a slight effect on the 2Pi bolo. Need more Ne. |
| Jan 9 1998 12:03:14:780PM | 980109016 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot 16: 2.5 MW & EDA mode. Ne increased to 0.03 sec width and triggered at 0.85. Prad/Pin ~ 0.5. Next shot we will do the TF sweep. |
| Jan 9 1998 12:33:56:300PM | 980109018 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #18: same shot but with TF sweep. There seems to be rearrangements in the ne, Te and rad power profiles? |
| Jan 9 1998 12:35:48:690PM | 980109019 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #19: Same again. Still getting a spatial profile for McPherson. JT says that he is able to identify the He-like Ne line which should give a better measure of the core density. |
| Jan 9 1998 12:43:35:850PM | 980109020 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #20: Same shot. The radiated power keeps changing from shot to shot, The rumour is that the profiles of density and Te are what is causing this. Goetz claims that the div. radiated power is not changing. |
| Jan 9 1998 01:02:43:620PM | 980109021 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot# 21: Larger Ne injection (60 ms). However, large Mo injection drops it out of H-mode. EDA returns with the larger Ne levels. |
| Jan 9 1998 01:48:47:980PM | 980109024 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #24: Great steady-state w/Ne. However the Prad/Pin is 50% still! Try for more Ne. |
| Jan 9 1998 01:57:05:490PM | 980109025 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #25: disrupts on the way down. Made it to Prad/Pin of 60%. 100 ms pulse starting at .8 sec. Next shot more. |
| Jan 9 1998 02:28:30:870PM | 980109027 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #27: 2.5 MW of radiation. Prad/Pin ~ 66%. But large ELM-like occurence in middle of shot (1.05 sec). Stay with this? |
| Jan 9 1998 02:43:29:560PM | 980109028 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #28: repeat of #27. |
| Jan 9 1998 02:46:49:020PM | 980109029 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #29: baseline shot, no Ne. However, big injection at 1.05 seconds. |
| Jan 9 1998 03:18:53:990PM | 980109030 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #30: 50 ms of Kr started at 0.8 seconds. It seems to get in at .845 and kills the H-mode at .87 seconds. Too much. We need to back off the Kr. |
| Jan 9 1998 03:33:37:050PM | 980109031 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #31: No H-mode until almost 0.9 seconds. Then we have an awful looking ELMy H-mode with a large amount of radiation. This may be coincident with a MARFE on the inner divertor. John finds that there is 3x the amount of Kr in the divertor during this shot (mostly L-mode) compared to 32. That is even with much less Kr injected -> H-mode causes the Kr compression to degrade. |
| Jan 9 1998 03:52:11:070PM | 980109032 | Bruce Lipschultz | Shot #32: Short H-mode. Jim Terry reports that the Kr level was significant even before the puff. Then the puff knocked it out of H-mode. Prad/Pin ~0.66. |
| Jan 9 1998 04:04:36:900PM | 980109033 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #33: delayed H-mode. Kr puff only 20 ms. Still 2.7 MW in radiated power. |
| Jan 9 1998 04:14:00:750PM | 980109034 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #34: shot ended quickly due to 'brick. |
| Jan 9 1998 04:25:13:180PM | 980109035 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #35: still awful plasma (same Kr puff). |
| Jan 9 1998 04:35:09:110PM | 980109036 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #36: Kr off and TF sweep off. Shot fairly nice. |
| Jan 9 1998 04:59:08:140PM | 980109037 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #37: Kr on with 2 PSI and 20 ms puff. Got the H-mode. It starts to degrade at 1.09 seconds. 2.8 MW of radiated power (67% radiation). No TF sweep this shot. Significant loss in stored energy. |
| Jan 9 1998 05:21:36:840PM | 980109038 | Bruce Lipschultz | shot #38: Shot same as 27. Got the TF sweep for Amanda as well. Almost 2.5 MW of radiated power. Amanda gets 2 sweeps, one during the hotter period and one later in the shot when there is more radiation. |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Jan 7 1998 05:09:12:490PM | Ian Hutchinson | Having set up the controllers in segment. Note that the gains are up to 2 for OH1, 4 for OH2. Draw in the 5000 A traces from -.2 to 1s. Draw in gains .25 OH1, .5 OH2 as a complete guess. Need to calculate. | |
| Jan 7 1998 05:09:56:340PM | Ian Hutchinson | OH2 testing set up. Copied segment 1 OH1 and OH2U to segment 4. Zeroed segment 1. Copied back OH1 and OH2U to segment 1, 2 versions of OH2. OH2 U went into predictor, was 0.5 each on OH2U and OH2L (we were lying, this was really controlling the average current.) set to 1. OH2U. in controller, was 0.00575 OH2U and OH2L removed OH2L. Now this really IS an OH2U wire. Asks for factor. Was.00035 now set to .0003 lower than offered numbers. Other wire. Change name to IC_OH2L. Do the corresponding things from the above to make this so. Complains about predictor. Had to use call and then customize. Complains about predictor having zero weights. Not true. When brought back things seems ok. Did this first but lost entry. | |
| Jan 7 1998 05:12:43:010PM | Ian Hutchinson | Saved to [.mds.bus] shot 1 | |
| Jan 7 1998 05:31:07:340PM | Ian Hutchinson | Constructed a chirped signal via: _t=ramp(701)/700.,_s=10.*sin(2.*3.142*(40.+80.*_t)*_t) Played around with different ramp numbers. 1000 messed up the smoothing 500-700 gave pretty similar answers. It looks reasonable when imported into PCS, though we are nearly aliased. Saved scope in [hutch.mds.bus]chirped.dat Copied signal into OH1 and OH2L V traces. Stretched the OH1 trace to +-20V (from +-10) using shift ctrl. Save as shot 2. | |
| Jan 8 1998 03:35:33:070PM | Steve Wolfe | Modifying Ian's shot#2 in seg1: Rename seg 1 "OH test" Copy TF V trace from segment 2 Increase gain on OH1 to 2.5 and OH2's to 5 for t<0 (note that OH2L gain was still like a normal startup, hadn't been set as in Ian's notes). Save as USER9:[WOLFE.MDS.SHOTS.HYBRID.PCS] shot 980109999 | |
| Jan 8 1998 03:51:08:930PM | Steve Wolfe | Tried looking at how many points there are, and found I needed to do a build all to get the loadables written. Did that and stored the result in shot 998. The answer is that there are 525 points in the V_OH1 waveform (Wavegen 17), and the same in OH2U and OH2L. Josh says the max number of wavegen points is nearly 4000 total for all channels, so we should be ok. Since the three oh's are all at the same time, there should be alot of headroom. We'll test after the run anyway. | |
| Jan 8 1998 04:24:44:430PM | Steve Wolfe | While I'm at it, set up segment 2 for the MP168 part of run. Import segment 2 from 980107025 Increase TF_CURRENT to 160KA (should give 5.7T) Draw 20msec pulses @.7sec on PG5 and PG1. I'll need to load a good startup (probably 980107025, just to be foolishly consistent) and copy the TF trace into it. Delete the old pcs$wolfe:pcs_999.*;* and Save as pcs$wolfe:pcs_999 | |
| Jan 8 1998 04:43:06:920PM | Ian Hutchinson | Calculated the time constants of the closed loop circuits of OH1 and OH2. With the controllers as .05775 and .00575 respectively, they are \tau=1/(P + Q_i) where P is the P gain of PID and Q_1=.052, Q_2=.1. Therefore a gain of 1 gives a time-constant of 0.1s which translates to a \omega.\tau of 25 at 40Hz: four percent compensation of the oscillating voltage only. At this gain, the DC error will be equal to Q_i, 5 and ten percent respectively. Sounds about right. | |
| Jan 8 1998 04:51:21:620PM | Steve Wolfe | Ian says the right gains for the t>0 part of the shot should be 1.0, rather than what he set up earlier. Make this change. Build all (why not?) Once again, delete the existing pcs$wolfe: 999 (Shouldn't matter or be necessary) Save as pcs$wolfe:pcs_999.* | |
| Jan 8 1998 05:23:56:570PM | Steve Wolfe | Thursday's Run is over. Now to test the shot we've prepared. Load from my pcs$wolfe: shot 999 Load/clean Bring up hybrid_control Take shot 374 Got an error after hitting trigger: %SYSTEM-F-NOLOGNAM, no logical name match % Compiled module: MDS$VMS_ERROR. % XMANAGER: Caught unexpected error from client application. Message follows... % Error returned from TCL command % %SYSTEM-F-NOLOGNAM, no logical name match Get out and do a REMCAM Try again (shot 375) Looks like it worked. Waveforms are ugly, but that was expected from limited number of points in wavegen traces. | |
| Jan 9 1998 06:49:45:370AM | Steve Wolfe | un Plan for Friday, 980109 Engineering setup: ------------------ For plasma operation (first shot): Engineering setup as on 980107025, except TF current limit set to 183kA (approximately 6T+ headroom) TF under hybrid control Remember to set the fizzle detector back to .08 Gas setup - fill K-side with 30 PSI of D2, hybrid enable fill B-top with 6 PSI of D2, hybrid enable fill B-side-lower with 4 PSI of Kr, hybrid disabled fill J-bottom with 4 PSI of Ne hybrid disabled The following gases will be used during this run: D2,Neon,Argon,Krypton, and Nitrogen. These bottles are presently installed. Following the run the Neon bottle should be replaced with Helium for ECDC over the weekend and running Helium plasmas next Tuesday. ECE gate valve enabled; others if diagnosticians are ready. | |
| Jan 9 1998 06:51:28:740AM | Steve Wolfe | un Plan for Friday, 980109 SL: Blip PO: wolfe MP 168 This run is in support of MP#168, "Exploration of the Effect on Core Confinement of Different Impurities". Power tests will be conducted between 08:00 and 09:00, to investigate possible instability in the OH2 response which seems to be contributing to our vertical stability problems. Ian Hutchinson will serve as Session Leader for these tests. Engineering setup: ------------------ Two hours of ECDC in Deuterium prior to run. For power tests: TF under hybrid control, current limit and timing as on 980107025. Fizzle detector start moved late (1.5 sec) OH1,OH2U and OH2L under hybrid control. PLC Limits [-10,10], start=-.4sec, switch close=-0.2, open=+2 (no commutation), crowbar=2.1, invert=1.2sec. We will turn the supplies on one at a time. Gas puffs disabled. Plenums filled as indicated below. | |
| Jan 9 1998 06:52:35:420AM | Steve Wolfe | Power Tests: ----------- Start from previously prepared shot with OH's at -5000 amps, with an oscillating voltage waveform chirping from 40-120Hz (pcs$wolfe:pcs_999). Run OH1, OH2U, OH2L power supplies one at a time, then perhaps together. Run TF pulse for all cases to include effect of alternator loading. Look for resonances in response at some range of frequencies. | |
| Jan 9 1998 06:52:51:880AM | Steve Wolfe | Plasma Run: ----------- The goal of this run is to assess the effect of various impurity gases on global confinement. We will start from a target shot taken from 980107025, but with increased TF=5.7T to avoid cutoff of the ECE. The TF will be ramped up by 7.5kA (~5%) during the shot for ECE pedestal measurements on some shots (not the first). The initial seg2 is now setup in pcs$wolfe:pcs_999 (but segment 2 is turned off). | |
| Jan 9 1998 06:53:19:210AM | Steve Wolfe | The planned shot sequence is: (1) Setup of H-mode plasma (3-4 shots) (2) Injection of Ne to achieve Prad,main/PIN= 0.5. (J-bottom valve) (5 shots for scan of McPherson + 2-3 setup shots). (3) repeat (2) with Prad,main/PIN = 0.7 (5 shots). (4) Injection of Kr to evaluate relative effect on profiles (3 shots). (B-side lower). We may repeat steps 2 and 3 in Kr depending on results. Between shots without holding up sequence, pump out J-bottom and fill with N2 If time permits: (5) Injection of N to achieve Prad,main/PIN = 0.5. (J-bottom valve) (3 shots for scan of McPherson + 2-3 setup shots). (6) repeat (5) with Prad,main/PIN = 0.7 (5 shots). | |
| Jan 9 1998 07:06:39:780AM | Steve Wolfe | OH test Shot is already loaded from last night. Do a coldstart. Got an A-matrix not responding error! Try coldstart again. 07:00 Bitbus log looks ok this time. No errors, all matrices respond. Hloader log looks ok. | |
| Jan 9 1998 07:30:47:880AM | Steve Wolfe | While I'm waiting, put segment 4 back to a fiducial. Import segment 4 from 971217017. Check on the gain on BP12_DE in ZCUR predictor; it is -15e3, not enough to account for a significant error on ZCUR with a 25e-3 difference from BTOR offset between BP12_BC and BP12_DE. I suspect actual offsets in the iso-amps, some of which are larger than this; e.g. input 37 (BP08_BC) has a .1V (50mT) offset. These have drifted since the last campaign. We probably should retweak these, but then shots from the last month would need adjusting. | |
| Jan 9 1998 08:18:28:720AM | 980109001 | Steve Wolfe | TF and OH2U Get a 20V amplitude (40V p-p) at the low frequency, dying off at the higher frequency. Next shot OH2L. |
| Jan 9 1998 08:37:01:470AM | 980109001 | Ian Hutchinson | Shot 1 oscillating OH2U shows no resonance. Gain is about 1.5 too high at lowest frequency. Roll off is quite rapid at the higher frequency. 3db point seems about .4s which is around 90Hz. It should not be so fast so soon. For some reason that chirp is going to 200 Hz. |
| Jan 9 1998 08:44:55:270AM | 980109002 | Ian Hutchinson | OH2L seems to have a slight resonance at the lower end of the frequency range. Not very severe. We realize that the expression we were using was not correct for what we had wanted. Still it gives us roughly a reasonable test. |
| Jan 9 1998 08:56:32:880AM | 980109002 | Steve Wolfe | Shot 2: TF and OH2L May show a small resonance arounf .1 sec (near 50Hz) |
| Jan 9 1998 08:51:10:600AM | 980109003 | Steve Wolfe | shot 3: TF and OH1 seems to roll off much faster, and has some similar oscillations before t=0. |
| Jan 9 1998 08:56:24:040AM | 980109003 | Ian Hutchinson | OH1 seems to roll off faster than the OH2s. |
| Jan 9 1998 09:01:55:310AM | 980109004 | Steve Wolfe | shot 4: TF and both OH2's. Change chirp to 20Hz: 80Hz. Note that previous expression was wrong, got to 200Hz. Now using _s = sin($2pi*(20.+30*_t)*_t) to get top frequency of 80Hz No apparent resonance in that. It looks like they are pretty linear. |
| Jan 9 1998 09:03:12:710AM | 980109004 | Ian Hutchinson | Slowed down the chirp to 20-60Hz. Ran OH2U/L simultaneously. No signs of anything bad happening. |
| Jan 9 1998 09:23:19:040AM | 980109005 | Steve Wolfe | Shot 5: Begin plasma run Load startup from 980107025. Copy TF waveform from seg 2 to seg 1 Turn on seg 2 ECE, pcx, moly monitor and VUV gate valves open. RF will try for 1.5MW this shot (wake up call) plasma full length. Long EDA H-mode. Startup looks good. 145kJ, H=1.7, Prf=1.7MW |
| Jan 9 1998 09:52:48:160AM | 980109007 | Steve Wolfe | Shot 6: repeat with more RF (we hope). Amanda is trying to get GPC back on the air; didn't show up on shot 5. fizzle. null looked bad on previous, and EF4's weren't cold. this time breakdown is a little late. EF4's still imbalanced (difference is positive); turns out the EF4U cryo valve wasn't open because of hysteresis. It was at -167, compared to -184 on lower. shot 7:When EF4U is down to -177 try again: another fizzle. balance is better, but not there yet. CII signal is up to .01. Br is still positive. Next shot, reduce Br offset. |
| Jan 9 1998 10:05:27:790AM | 980109008 | Steve Wolfe | Shot 8: Br offset from .006 to .0055 I suspect the real problem is dirt. CII iwas at .01 on shot 7, .008 on shot 6. plasma full length, still a big early marfe. EF4 balance to 0. now. CII down to .006 Got over 2MW RF, no H-mode during RF, H-mode after RF. H-alpha has a big flat enhancement. |
| Jan 9 1998 10:24:29:530AM | 980109009 | Steve Wolfe | Shot 9: repeat. plasma. full length, Looks like a good H-mode from TV. DAQA crashed right after shot, no data. For next shot, reduce TF current from 160->157kA. It was noted that on shot 8 we were at 5.8T instead of 5.7. Tom tried to recoverf the data from shot 9, but it is gone. |
| Jan 9 1998 10:34:44:900AM | 980109010 | Steve Wolfe | Shot 10: repeat with reduced TF current from 160->157kA. It was noted that on shot 8 we were at 5.8T instead of 5.7. . fizzle. EF4 imbalance down to -30A. CII at .008 again. |
| Jan 9 1998 10:43:26:310AM | 980109011 | Steve Wolfe | Shot 11: repeat with reduced TF current from 160->157kA. It was noted that on shot 8 we were at 5.8T instead of 5.7. . plasma. Looked on the TV like #9. Looks like a good EDA. Prf=2.2MW, W=147kJ. There still seems to be a problem with ECE calibration? |
| Jan 9 1998 10:56:08:680AM | 980109012 | Steve Wolfe | Shot 12: repeat, try for .4MW more RF. Note that CII was down to .004 on shot 11. plasma, 2.5MW, H-mode. 160kJ Next shot Neon |
| Jan 9 1998 11:07:43:660AM | 980109013 | Steve Wolfe | Shot 13: repeat with 20msec Ne pulse at 0.7sec plasma. H-mode. Only a small increase in 2pi signal |
| Jan 9 1998 11:23:59:510AM | 980109014 | Steve Wolfe | Shot 14: Delay Ne pulse to .85sec, increase to 30msec fizzle. CII at .006, bd a little late (6.3msec) Br maybe a little positive. Just try again. |
| Jan 9 1998 11:27:34:940AM | 980109015 | Steve Wolfe | Shot 15: repeat Delay Ne pulse to .85sec, increase to 30msec another fizzle. Try some tweaks. |
| Jan 9 1998 11:33:51:590AM | 980109015 | Steve Wolfe | Shot 15: repeat Delay Ne pulse to .85sec, increase to 30msec another fizzle. CII is down to .003, it isn't that. bd at .005, nice and early. Br looks a little negative, but null looks good. It got to 40kA and hit something. Looks to me like Bz isn't coming in fast enough. |
| Jan 9 1998 11:51:30:530AM | 980109016 | Steve Wolfe | Shot 16: EF4 from -1345->-1330 Delay Ne pulse to .85sec, increase to 30msec plasma. H-mode; I doubt that the EF4 tweak did it, though. Nice current rise; it's at 55ka at 15msec, with Bz of .007. bd is actually later, 6.8msec. I still am not happy with the startup. I may want to tweak the RCUR offset. Got more Ne this time, about 200kW on the 2pi. Start the scan, TF waggle on next shot. |
| Jan 9 1998 11:56:50:100AM | 980109017 | Steve Wolfe | Shot 17: TF waggle at 1.0sec to -164500kA. No startup tweak this time. fizzle, should have tweaked. |
| Jan 9 1998 12:14:20:240PM | 980109018 | Steve Wolfe | Shot 18: RCUR offset in segment 1 to 7000 TF waggle at 1.0sec to -164500kA. plasma, H-modes, etc. When it goes it goes. field in somewhat faster, 10mT @15msec. Little drop in neutron rate and Halpha at peak of radiation. |
| Jan 9 1998 12:27:07:750PM | 980109019 | Steve Wolfe | shot 19: repeat plasma. breakdown is later. |
| Jan 9 1998 12:37:25:210PM | 980109020 | Steve Wolfe | shot 20: Move TF waggle to .73 sec Seg 1 RCUR offset from 7000 to 8000 plasma, H-modes Next shot more Neon. |
| Jan 9 1998 12:57:17:010PM | 980109021 | Steve Wolfe | shot 21: INcrease neon pulse width to 60msec. Bring EF4 back to -1345A plasma. bd earlier 5.8msec, but a slight hesitation. Two EDA periods this time. Big injection at .93 |
| Jan 9 1998 01:10:10:510PM | 980109022 | Steve Wolfe | shot 22: EF4 to -1335; move TF waggle back to 1sec fizzle. hesitation seemed to get it, even though I went part way back. Br is positive again. bd is later 8msec. |
| Jan 9 1998 01:16:26:330PM | 980109023 | Steve Wolfe | shot 23: EF4 to -1330; That should be essentially no change, but back to a setting that ran. TF waggle at 1sec fizzle. |
| Jan 9 1998 01:35:36:350PM | 980109024 | Steve Wolfe | shot 24: Br offset from .0055 to .005 TF waggle at 1sec plasma. bd is even later 7.5msec, br is almost unchanged except for a thrash at 3msec. Radiated power is up, no injection this time. |
| Jan 9 1998 01:56:03:990PM | 980109025 | Steve Wolfe | shot 25: Need more radiation. Move Neon pulse to 0.8 sec and turn on for 100msec plasma, ends a bit earlier in rampdown 1.38sec bd slightly earlier. Still a big Br jump around 3msec. Neon puff drops the halpha, 2MW of Prad. Clear change in Halpha, lower stored energy |
| Jan 9 1998 02:03:05:620PM | 980109026 | Steve Wolfe | shot 26: Need still more radiation. Move Neon pulse to 0.8 sec and turn on for 150msec dud EF3 breaker pulled before shot. EF3 had 4KA of induced current at t=0. |
| Jan 9 1998 02:24:37:950PM | 980109027 | Steve Wolfe | shot 27: Repeat try with 150msec Ne puff. plasma. 1.33sec Almost completely suppresses the EDA Halpha level, got an ELM at 1.03 sec bd at 6.3msec, rise is ok. For some reason, the last point on the EF4 flattop was at -.003 sec, but at some point today I've moved it to t=0. Hard to believe this matters, but it may be related to the Br thrash at +3msec. Don't do amything about it now. Wait till a fizzle. |
| Jan 9 1998 02:33:54:780PM | 980109028 | Steve Wolfe | shot 28: move Ne puff to 750msec, width 140ms plasma . Almost identical. bd back to 7.2msec, no hesitation. Leave it be. Next shot no neon |
| Jan 9 1998 02:46:30:590PM | 980109029 | Steve Wolfe | shot 29: Turn off J-bottom. No neon. plasma back to 1.6sec length Big injection at 1.05sec |
| Jan 9 1998 03:11:47:150PM | 980109030 | Steve Wolfe | shot 30: Krypton B-side lower pulse at .8 sec for 50msec disrupts just into ranpdown. Lost the H-mode at .87sec bolo gets to 3MW. |
| Jan 9 1998 03:27:12:470PM | 980109031 | Steve Wolfe | shot 31: Shorten Kr puff to 35msec. Change TF sweep to up and down +/- 4kA, still starting at 1.0sec plasma to 1.36sec. Long delay before L-H at .87 sec, then very ELMy. Initial Halpha seems to follow RF, similar to shot 8 |
| Jan 9 1998 03:39:32:770PM | 980109032 | Steve Wolfe | shot 32: No changes, let the plasma adapt? plasma to 1.4sec, One transmitter shut off early. goes into H-mode promptly, but density turns over at .87, H-L at .918 |
| Jan 9 1998 03:55:06:670PM | 980109033 | Steve Wolfe | shot 33: Reduce Kr to 20msec, extend reverse sweep on TF to 1.15sec plasma to 1.46,; Kr must be going away. Late L-H again. |
| Jan 9 1998 04:10:43:100PM | 980109034 | Steve Wolfe | shot 34: Repeat it like this. Disrupted early at .3sec. Looks like multiple bricks. 2pi goes to 8MW |
| Jan 9 1998 04:22:38:870PM | 980109035 | Steve Wolfe | shot 35: Move TF ramp to 0.9sec and make it unipolar again (157 to 164.5kA) in 100msec plasma to 1.5sec L-H at .72sec, start to lose EDA at .86, ELM or H-L at 1.00, second h-mode at 1.02 Next shot turn off TF sweep. |
| Jan 9 1998 04:34:14:370PM | 980109036 | Steve Wolfe | shot 36: Turn off TF ramp and Kr puff. plasma to 1.63 sec, long EDA 2pi at 800kW, 147kJ Next shot reduce Kr plenum pressure to 1.9psi and turn on the 20msec puff again |
| Jan 9 1998 04:51:21:500PM | 980109037 | Steve Wolfe | shot 37: 20msec Kr puff @1.9psi in plenum (was 4) at .8sec plasma to 1.57sec, long EDA, H-alpha starts dropping ELmy behavior aroumd 1.08, followed by short RF trip. Stored energy starts at 155kJ, drops linearly to 117 by end of RF pulse. bolo goes to 2.8MW Tfsweep back on next shot. |
| Jan 9 1998 05:09:14:540PM | 980109038 | Steve Wolfe | shot 38: 20msec Kr puff @1.9psi in plenum (was 4) at .8sec TF sweep starting at 0.9sec plasma to 1.54sec one long EDA, similar to 37 stored energy is down all the way through, dropping to 119kJ Two injections early in RF pulse. bolo ends up at 2.2MW prad. |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 08:13:48:570AM | Test | Ok | |
| 2 | 08:32:53:260AM | Test | Ok | |
| 3 | 08:48:24:180AM | Test | Ok | |
| 4 | 08:58:11:960AM | Test | Ok | |
| 5 | 09:14:21:620AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 6 | 09:30:57:770AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 7 | 09:44:25:420AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 8 | 09:54:29:850AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 9 | 10:08:21:770AM | Plasma | Bad | computer crash |
| 10 | 10:26:53:090AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 11 | 10:35:48:350AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 12 | 10:49:16:490AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 13 | 11:00:25:940AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 14 | 11:17:22:950AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 15 | 11:26:02:750AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 16 | 11:37:29:380AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 17 | 11:55:28:280AM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 18 | 12:04:28:840PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 19 | 12:18:37:330PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 20 | 12:32:36:660PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 21 | 12:48:19:360PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 22 | 01:03:22:590PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 23 | 01:14:57:940PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 24 | 01:27:50:180PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 25 | 01:44:25:980PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 26 | 01:58:50:190PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 27 | 02:14:38:440PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 28 | 02:28:02:370PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 29 | 02:40:36:730PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 30 | 03:00:36:720PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 31 | 03:18:18:540PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 32 | 03:31:56:030PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 33 | 03:47:40:220PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 34 | 04:05:36:050PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 35 | 04:14:46:710PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 36 | 04:26:41:560PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 37 | 04:41:55:420PM | Plasma | Ok | |
| 38 | 04:56:29:960PM | Plasma | Ok | |