Alcator C-Mod Run 980203 Information

Back to runs

Miniproposals
Miniproposal:155
Date Filed: 7/15/1996
Title:H-Mode Confinement Scaling MP No. 155
First Author:Martin Greenwald
Session Leader:Martin Greenwald (shots 1-33)

Operators
Session leader(s):Martin Greenwald
Physics operator(s):Earl Marmar
Engineering operator(s):Frank Silva,Vinny Bertolino,Bill Cochran

Engineering Operator Run Comment
yes

Session Leader Plans

Physics Operators Plans

Session Leader Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:17:943PM
Author: To Be Determined
Run Summary for 980203
Confinement Scaling MP 155

Session Leader: Greenwald
Phys Op: Marmar

============================

Plan:

The goal was to extend the parameter range for our h-mode
confinement studies. The mp has ambitious goals overall -
to scale with Ip, ne, Bt, kappa, and Prf. For this run, we
concentrate on Ip.

We start with a fiducial shot.

then...

Bt = 5.6 to avoid ECE cutoff; small ramps will be added to get
edge profiles. We will also be getting edge data from the soft
xray arrays.

The current scan will be much wider Ip = 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4 MA
Prf ~ 2.5 MW

The density scan will be relatively small, we want to work in
the vicinity of the ELMfree/EDA boundary; nl04 ~ 1e20.
The Ip scan will be repeated for a "high" and "low" density.

We want impurity injection (laser blowoff) and impurity confinement
times on as many shots as possible.


==============================

Results:

Mixed, we did run plasmas over the desired current range. Radiation was
high, even for EDA plasmas. Stored energy scaled roughly linearly with
Ip, though it was about 30% below our best results. Jim got some
impurity confinement data - tauI seems to scale with current as well.
Bob found scaling of the pedestal width ~ 1/Ip though with some
ambiguous shots. We scanned the Bt to allow GPC edge profiles. These
didn't show much Ip scaling, suggesting that either the GPC and the edge
xray array are looking at quantities with different widths, or that the
GPC resolution is to large to see these differences. Fluctuations were
seen with Bp probes and on the reflectometer - more analysis needs to be
done. Some scanning probe data was obtained at the lower currents.
Disruptions limited operation at the highest currents.

We got much stronger EDA's at low currents and ELMfree discharges at
high currents. This suggests some sort of q dependence on the as
yet unknown EDA mechanism.

================================

Shots suitable for further analysis include:

980203006 0.8 MA Fiducial shot
009 0.8 MA
010 0.8 MA
011 0.8 MA
013 0.6 MA
015 0.6 MA
016 0.6 MA
020 0.4 MA
021 0.4 MA
024 1.0 MA
025 1.0 MA
026 1.0 MA
027 1.0 MA
028 1.4 MA
033 1.2 MA


Physics Operator Summaries
Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:36:58:927PM
Author: To Be Determined
physop run summary 980203

SL: Greenwald
PO: Marmar
EO: Cochrane, Silva, Bertolino

MP 155 -- H-mode confinement scaling

Discharge clean in deuterium for 2 hours before the run


The goal is to extend the parameter range for our h-mode
confinement studies. The mp has ambitious goals overall -
to scale with Ip, ne, Bt, kappa, and Prf. For this run, we
will concentrate on Ip, ne, and Prf.


Start with a Tuesday test followed by a fiducial: engineering and gas settings
as on 980120025.

After a good fiducial:

Bt = 5.6 to avoid ECE cutoff; small ramps will be added to get
edge profiles.

The current scan will be wide Ip = 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4 MA
Prf ~ 2.5 MW.

The density scan will be relatively small, in
the vicinity of the ELMfree/EDA boundary: nl04 ~ 1e20.
The Ip scan will be repeated for a "high" and "low" density.

The power scan will be at 0.8 MA. Prf will be scanned from the minimum for
H-mode to the maximum available power, hopefully at least 3 MW.

_____________________________________________________________________________

We accomplished a current scan, from .4 MA to 1.4 MA. The H-modes were not
great (H typically < 1.5) and there was a lot of radiation on many shots.
There were also many shots which disrupted; at least some of the disruptions
were caused by large injections. The first attempt at 1.4 MA (shot 28) made it
just into rampdown, disrupting at 1.2 MA.

33 data cycles = 28 plasmas + 3 fizzles + 1 test + 1 no power

Coldstart hybrid; no problems.

load shot from 980120025
load seg 1 from 980123002




1. Tuesday OH test; no fizzle detector; coaxes ok

2. Fiducial attempt; fizzle; B_r too negative

3. B_r offset to .0065 from .0045; plasma; disrupt at .28; many injections

4. PF breaker pulled during init; back to recool; no power shot

5. B_R offset to .006 from .0065; lower seg 4 gas prog volt; plasma; some early
hards; disrupt at .54; injections

6. touch the seg 1 gas slightly; plasma; still some hards; H-mode on second RF
pulse (1.75 MW)

7. increase pre-puff by 1 msec; plasma; no hards; RF ramping;

8. TF to 5.6 T from 5.3; lower target nl_04 to .83e20 from 1e20; fiddle with
late part of ramp-down; magnet resistance fault; dud

9. retry; plasma; target density did not come down much; a few early hards

10. lower puff voltage program; target nl still too high

11. move x-point up 5 mm; lower gas puff voltage; increase nl_04 gain; put twiddle
into TF between 1.0 and 1.3 s; add 1 msec to prepuff; plasma

12. 600 kA; nl_04 down to 7.5e19; plasma; injections during RF

13. raise nl_04 prog 10%; add some gas during RF; move RXL up 5 mm; plasma;
some RF trips; early hards;

14. EF4 5 amp less -ve at breakdown; fiddle with nl_04 feedback late in RF
pulse; fizzle

15. add 1 msec to prepuff; plasma; hards early;

16. EF4 5 more amp less -ve; plasma; no hards

17. 400 kA; fizzle

18. B_r offset to .0065T from .006; plasma; disrupt at .48; vertically unstable

19. reduce clearin by 8 mm; plasma; disrupt at .33; big injection just prior to
disrupt.

20. fiddle with I_p time history; plasma; no hards

21. repeat for fast scanning probe; plasma

22. go to 1 MA; load seg 2 from 980123033; lower nl_04 prog & puff volt
preprog; plasma; a lot of radiated power during H-mode

23. put TF scan back in; turn gas puff back on during H-mode; plasma; didn't
get the puff.

24. modify TF scan; reduce argon; add gas puff after .7 sec; plasma

25. turn off argon; RCUR out by 2 mm; plasma

26. repeat; RF on earlier; plasma

27. ask for higher target density; plasma

28. 1.4 MA; plasma; disrupt on rampdown at 1.2 MA, near q=3; H-modes look
ELM-free

29. RCUR in by 3 mm; decrease clearin by 3 mm; plasma; increase nl_04; disrupt on rampup at .53
s; halo waring; EFCU coil stress warning.

30. slow current ramp slightly; increase clearin 3 mm; decrease RCUR 1 mm;
delay RF; plasma; disrupt at .9 s; halo warning

31. reload seg 2 from shot 28; increase nl_04; slow I_p ramp slightly; decrease
RCUR 2 mm; decrease clearin 2 mm; increase EF4 PLC limit to -10kA; plasma;
disrupt at .7 s

32. 1.2 MA; plasma; disrupt at .34s; brick

33. retry; plasma; multiple H-modes.

Session Leader Comments
Feb 3 1998 09:03:44:280AMMartin GreenwaldRun plan for mp 155
H-mode confinement scaling

The goal here is to extend the parameter range for our h-mode
confinement studies. The mp has ambitious goals overall -
to scale with Ip, ne, Bt, kappa, and Prf. For this run, we
will concentrate on Ip, ne, and Prf.

We should start with a fiducial shot.

then...

Bt = 5.6 to avoid ECE cutoff; small ramps will be added to get
edge profiles. We will also be getting edge data from the soft
xray arrays.

The current scan will be much wider Ip = 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4 MA
Prf ~ 2.5 MW

The density scan will be relatively small, we want to work in
the vicinity of the ELMfree/EDA boundary; nl04 ~ 1e20.
The Ip scan will be repeated for a "high" and "low" density.

The power scan will be at 0.8 MA, this widens the scrapeoff and makes
RF coupling easier. Prf will be scanned from the minimum for H-mode
to the maximum available power, hopefully at least 3 MW.

We want impurity injection (laser blowoff) and impurity confinement
times on as many shots as possible.
Feb 3 1998 09:46:53:990AM980203002Martin Greenwaldfizzle
Feb 3 1998 10:04:23:600AM980203003Martin Greenwaldshort plasma, disrupts at 0.3 sec
Feb 3 1998 10:14:40:680AM980203005Martin GreenwaldGot a bit farther, reach 0.8 MA at .55 seconds, then disrupted
Feb 3 1998 10:28:14:750AM980203006Martin GreenwaldGood fiducial
Feb 3 1998 10:54:30:130AM980203007Martin GreenwaldSimilar shot, but with RF ramp to calibrate power programming
Feb 3 1998 10:55:10:050AM980203008Martin GreenwaldPS fault
Feb 3 1998 11:05:52:790AM980203009Martin GreenwaldGood Shot, density still a bit high

Bt = 5.6
Ip = 0.8
Prf = 2.65
ne target = 1.6
div n0 targe = 15
Wmhd = 0.124
Feb 3 1998 11:23:00:130AM980203010Martin GreenwaldGood Shot

Bt = 5.6
Ip = 0.8
Prf = 2.5
ne target = 1.5
div n0 = 10
Wmhd = 0.12

Feb 3 1998 11:44:23:750AM980203011Martin Greenwald
Good Shot

Bt = 5.6
Ip = 0.8
Prf = 2.5
ne target = 1.4
div n0 = 12
Wmhd = 0.13

Feb 3 1998 12:01:38:890PM980203012Martin GreenwaldIp lowered to 0.6 MA
several large injections, interupt H-modes
Feb 3 1998 12:12:29:870PM980203013Martin GreenwaldOK Shot, multiple RF trips

Bt = 5.6
Ip = 0.6
Prf = 2.5 (tripping to 1.2)
ne target = 1.3
div n0 = 15
Wmhd = 0.8

Feb 3 1998 12:29:55:790PM980203014Martin GreenwaldFizzle
Feb 3 1998 12:37:51:380PM980203015Martin GreenwaldGood Shot

Bt = 5.6
Ip = 0.6
Prf = 2.4
ne target = 1.3
div n0 = 17
Wmhd = .08

Feb 3 1998 01:01:12:360PM980203016Martin GreenwaldRepeat of 15
Feb 3 1998 01:01:47:750PM980203017Martin Greenwaldfizzle
Feb 3 1998 01:26:28:180PM980203019Martin Greenwaldearly disruption

Feb 3 1998 01:38:45:260PM980203020Martin GreenwaldGood Shot

Bt = 5.6
Ip = 0.4
Prf = 2.5
ne target = 1.3
div n0 = 15
Wmhd = .05

Feb 3 1998 01:59:00:790PM980203021Martin Greenwald
Good Shot

Bt = 5.6
Ip = 0.4
Prf = 2.4
ne target = 1.2
div n0 = 15
Wmhd = .052

Feb 3 1998 02:12:38:050PM980203022Martin GreenwaldFirst try at 1 MA

H-mode only lasts .22 sec
Prad comes up to 2.5 MW
Wmhd reaches .144

Feb 3 1998 02:28:26:030PM980203023Martin Greenwaldvery similar to shot 22
Feb 3 1998 02:41:00:040PM980203024Martin GreenwaldSimilar to 22, three separate h-mode phases

Feb 3 1998 03:00:08:540PM980203025Martin Greenwaldsame as 24
Feb 3 1998 03:09:39:310PM980203026Martin Greenwaldlonger RF pulse
4 distinct h-modes
Feb 3 1998 03:20:34:350PM980203027Martin Greenwaldditto
Feb 3 1998 03:41:56:590PM980203028Martin Greenwaldmultiple elmfree h-modes
ip = 1.4 MA


Feb 3 1998 03:56:49:530PM980203029Martin GreenwaldEarly disruption

Feb 3 1998 04:16:31:380PM980203030Martin Greenwald1.4 MA
early disruption

1 elm-free h-mode period
multiple rf trips

Feb 3 1998 04:31:54:810PM980203031Martin Greenwaldearly disruption
Feb 3 1998 04:44:57:500PM980203032Martin Greenwaldattempt at 1.2 MA
early disruption

Feb 3 1998 04:58:28:520PM980203033Martin Greenwald1.2 MA
multiple elm-free h-modes

Physics Operator Comments
Feb 3 1998 08:56:08:860AMEarl MarmarRun plan for 980203
MP 155 -- H-mode confinement scaling

Discharge clean in deuterium for 2 hours before the run


The goal is to extend the parameter range for our h-mode
confinement studies. The mp has ambitious goals overall -
to scale with Ip, ne, Bt, kappa, and Prf. For this run, we
will concentrate on Ip, ne, and Prf.


Start with a Tuesday test followed by a fiducial: engineering and gas settings
as on 980120025.

After a good fiducial:

Bt = 5.6 to avoid ECE cutoff; small ramps will be added to get
edge profiles.

The current scan will be wide Ip = 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4 MA
Prf ~ 2.5 MW.

The density scan will be relatively small, in
the vicinity of the ELMfree/EDA boundary: nl04 ~ 1e20.
The Ip scan will be repeated for a "high" and "low" density.

The power scan will be at 0.8 MA. Prf will be scanned from the minimum for
H-mode to the maximum available power, hopefully at least 3 MW.

Feb 3 1998 08:58:20:230AMEarl MarmarColdstart hybrid; no problems.

load shot from 980120025
load seg 1 from 980123002


Feb 3 1998 09:44:32:380AM980203002Earl Marmar Fiducial attempt; fizzle; B_r too negative
Feb 3 1998 10:06:55:510AM980203003Earl MarmarB_r offset to .0065 from .0045; plasma; disrupt at .28; many injections

Feb 3 1998 10:07:08:040AM980203004Earl MarmarPF breaker pulled during init; back to recool; no power shot

Feb 3 1998 10:56:12:830AM980203005Earl MarmarB_R offset to .006 from .0065; lower seg 4 gas prog volt; plasma; some early
hards; disrupt at .54; injections
Feb 3 1998 10:56:24:760AM980203006Earl Marmartouch the seg 1 gas slightly; plasma; still some hards; H-mode on second RF
pulse (1.75 MW)
Feb 3 1998 10:56:37:630AM980203007Earl Marmarincrease pre-puff by 1 msec; plasma; no hards; RF ramping
Feb 3 1998 10:56:50:310AM980203008Earl MarmarTF to 5.6 T from 5.3; lower target nl_04 to .83e20 from 1e20; fiddle with
late part of ramp-down; magnet resistance fault; dud

Engineering Operator Comments
ShotTimeTypeStatusComment
109:08:58:330AMTestBadno fizzle detector
209:38:39:830AMPlasmaOk
309:47:17:610AMPlasmaOk
409:56:40:410AMTestOkOH1 sel power ckt fired in A&B, PLC sync shot no power. fault occured wh
510:12:22:150AMPlasmaOkno faults/plasma
610:22:12:540AMPlasmaOkno faults/plasma
710:34:47:450AMPlasmaOkno faults/plasma
810:52:57:550AMPlasmaBadmag. res. flt
910:59:36:000AMPlasmaOk
1011:14:54:200AMPlasmaOk
1111:36:09:580AMPlasmaOk
1211:48:48:370AMPlasmaOk
1312:05:22:060PMPlasmaOk
1412:21:40:560PMPlasmaOk
1512:31:29:530PMPlasmaOk
1612:46:50:510PMPlasmaOk
1712:59:51:280PMPlasmaOkfizzle
1801:10:03:880PMPlasmaOk
1901:22:45:290PMPlasmaOk
2001:33:04:480PMPlasmaOk
2101:49:58:880PMPlasmaOk
2202:05:02:860PMPlasmaOk
2302:19:27:370PMPlasmaOk
2402:36:17:670PMPlasmaOk
2502:47:12:550PMPlasmaOk
2603:04:57:230PMPlasmaOk
2703:16:57:420PMPlasmaOk
2803:32:48:740PMPlasmaOk
2903:50:53:280PMPlasmaOk
3004:11:23:930PMPlasmaOk
3104:29:33:390PMPlasmaOk
3204:41:41:730PMPlasmaOk
3304:54:46:160PMPlasmaOk