| Miniproposals | ||||||||||
|
| Operators | |
| Session leader(s): | Brian Labombard |
| Physics operator(s): | Earl Marmar |
| Engineering operator(s): | Gary Dekow,Frank Silva,Bill Cochran |
| Engineering Operator Run Comment |
| MP#228 SOL Transport Marmer,Silva |
| Session Leader Plans |
| Physics Operators Plans |
| Session Leader Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 03:49:21:023PM |
| Author: To Be Determined |
| Session Leader's summary of run 990831 MP#228 - SOL Transport using Ohmic H-modes Physics Operator: Marmar Session Leader: LaBombard Although MP#228 did not originally call for ohmic H-modes, it was recognized that ohmic H-modes provide a nice way to study H-mode transport under a variety of toroidal fields which are not compatible with ICRF heating. Additionally, SOL transport studies rely heavily on the use of probes. Therefore, ohmic H-modes are a particularly nice discharge to study since they tend to have the lowest power densities and they lack any complications for probe interpretation in the presence of RF-sheath effects. The drawbacks are a limited range of qPsi95 and the inability to initiate an L-H transition at a particular time, relative to that of well-conditioned RF heated discharges. We were successful in getting a number of good H-modes during this run with the scanning probes recording profiles of n, Te, parallel flow, and fluctuations up to the separatrix. This required taking many repeat shots and walking the fine line between getting the probes deep enough to record interesting profile data and yet not inserting them so deep that they got destroyed. Hence the need for a dedicated run. On a number of discharges, the scanning probes (mostly ASP but sometimes FSP) appeared to poke into a 'shear layer'-like zone where the floating potential (Vf) dropped dramatically (100 V/mm) and the fluctuations appeared to be suppressed. The 'shear layer' Vf gradient also appeared to be much stronger in the 'elm-free' phase. Observations of C+2 plume dispersal on a few selected shots showed a qualitatively similar behavior: during 'elm-free' phases there was some very strong poloidal dispersion while in EDA-like phases the poloidal dispersal was much smaller. One should keep in mind that all these 'on the fly' observations are preliminary and need to be carefully checked. The run plan called for: (a) a Bt scan at fixed qPsi95 and (b) a qPhi95 scan at fixed Bt. We got a limited Bt scan. There was not enough time to do the qPhi95 scan. Although the data has not been analyzed yet, these data should provide a good start on H-mode SOL profile scaling (with Bt) and on SOL fluctuations. ________________________________________________________________________________ Posted Run Plan ________________________________________________________________________________ Objectives: Record cross-field SOL profiles of density, Te, parallel flow, and fluctuations in ohmic H-mode discharges with: (a) constant qPsi95 but different Bt and (b) fixed Bt and different qPsi95. Setup: FSP: - Operate in two bias modes: (a) West/East-sweep, North/South-float mode (b) West/South-sweep, North/East-float mode - Enable gas (C2H4) for optional plumes - Set up for a "deep" scan to the separatrix ASP: - Operate in two bias modes: (South probe is dead) (a) West/East-sweep, North-float mode (b) West-sweep, North/East-float mode - Set up for a "deep" scan to the separatrix FMP: - Operate in two bias modes: (a) Divertor probes in sweep and Vf mode with gated fast sampling (b) Divertor probes in Isat and Vf mode with continuous fast sampling Set fast triggers to capture Ohmic H-mode phase. Starting Discharge: Reload 990825003 and take shot. This was a dithering 1.0 MA NL04=1.0 discharge with good gaps and probes targeting. Reload segment 3 (which is presently a modified version of segment 3 from shot# 990819001): 1 MA, Ohmic H-mode ending with Bt at 5 tesla. Set gaps to 1.5 cm. Set lower x-point programming similar to 990825003. Shot plan: (a) Bt scan with constant q. Program to arrive at different Bt during end-of-shot 'flat-top'. Adjust Ip so that qPsi95 is roughly the same during end-of-shot 'flat-top'. 1 redo 990825003 2-3 setup Ohmic H-mode shot, optimized scanning probe targeting 4-6 FSP/ASP/FMP in bias mode (a) then (b) 7 Change end point Bt to 3.5 tesla, Ip = 0.7 MA. 8-10 FSP/ASP/FMP in bias mode (a) then (b) 11 Change end point Bt to 6.0 tesla, Ip = 1.2 MA. 12-14 FSP/ASP/FMP in bias mode (a) then (b) (b) q scan with constant Bt. Set Bt flat-top to 4.0 tesla. Scan Ip from 0.8 to 1.2 MA (may be 1.1 MA if we are afraid of a low q disruption!) 15-16 Ip=0.8MA, setup discharge with optimized scanning probe targeting 17-19 FSP/ASP/FMP in bias mode (a) then (b) 20 change to Ip=1.0 MA 21-23 FSP/ASP/FMP in bias mode (a) then (b) 24 change to Ip=1.2 MA 25-27 FSP/ASP/FMP in bias mode (a) then (b) ________________________________________________________________________________ Actual Shot summary: shot Ip Bt Probe Bias Plume Comment 1 OH coax test 2 1 5 Mach Dithering, shallow probe scan, G-side gauge off 3 1 4-5 Mach CIII No H-mode 4 1 4-5 Mach CIII H-mode, goes L at 5 tesla 5 1 4-5 Mach CIII H-mode, shallow insertion during H-mode 6 1 4-5 Mach CIII Nice H-mode, FSP too deep, no spectroscopy data! 7 1 4-5 Mach Nice ASP FSP data during H-mode 8 1 4-5 Fluctuation ASP FSP data 9 .7 3.5 Mach CIII Shallow insertion 10 .75 3.5 Mach CIII into H-mode at second probe scan, G-side ratiomatic was off 11 .75 3.5 Mach into H-mode at second probe scan 12 .75 3.5 Mach H-mode on both probe scans 13 .75 3.5 Mach H-mode on both probe scans, Data on first scan on ASP looks excellent! 14 .75 3.5 Fluctuation H-mode on both probe scans 15 .75 3.5 Mach H-mode on both probe scans 16 1.2 4-6 disrupted at 0.47 sec 17 1.2 4-6 Mach CIII disrupted at 0.92 sec, after first probe scan 18 1.1 4-6 Mach CIII no H-mode 19 1.15 4-6 Mach CIII H-mode, drops out of H then disrupts at 1.09 20 1.2 4-6 Mach CIII H-mode on first scan, L-mode on second 21 1.2 4-6 Mach CIII H-mode on first scan, H to L-mode on second 22 1.2 4-6 Mach CIII Probe induced disruption! 0.87 s 23 0.9 4 Mach CIII Shallow injection, first scan L second scan H 24 no plasma 25 0.9 4 Mach EDA-like H-mode on second scan 26 disrupted early 27 0.9 4 Fluctuation H-mode on two probe scans FSP goes in deep, sees drop in Vf at sep on both scans while ASP only sees drop in Vf on second scan 28 0.9 4 Mach H-mode on both scans, shallower insertion |
| Physics Operator Summaries |
| Entered: Jul 7 2004 04:37:08:990PM |
| Author: To Be Determined |
| Physop run summary -- 990831 MP#228 SOL Transport using Ohmic H-modes SL: LaBombard PO: Marmar EO: Silva, Cochrane, Dekow ______________________________________________________________________________________ Plan: Start (after Tuesday OH test) with standard 1MA 5.1T plasma (like 990825003). Then introduce TF ramps to get ohmic H-mode. Current and field will be scanned shot to shot according to the miniproposal requirements. ICRF will piggyback as possible at the end of flattop, to test and condition J3 and J4. ______________________________________________________________________________________ The run went reasonably well. We got some nice looking EDA ohmic H-modes (shots 7, 12, 14, 15, 25, 27 and 28). A number of the shots ended in high current disruptions (e.g. 16, 17, 19, 22, 26, 27); for 19, 22, 26 and 27, the disruptions were preceded by large step increases in radiated power. J3 and J4 were run into plasma at the 1.5 MW total level. Startup reliability was excellent. There was one power supply dud, due to the OH2L breaker pulling on shot 24. Shot 6 suffered a paranormal loss of spectroscopy data; it appears that a spectroscopy_start event was generated after initialization, but before the start of the discharge. There were no camac errors, but all data looked like they had been digitized during a period with no plasma. Scorecard: 26 plasmas 1 PS dud 1 test _______ 28 shot cycles |
| Session Leader Comments | |||
| Aug 31 1999 09:44:21:233AM | Brian Labombard | MP#228 SOL Transport using Ohmic H-Modes Objectives: Record cross-field SOL profiles of density, Te, // flow, and fluctuations in ohmic H-mode discharges with: (a) constant qPsi95 but different Bt and (b) fixed Bt and different qPsi95. Setup: FSP: - Operate in two bias modes: (a) West/East-sweep, North/South-float mode (b) West/South-sweep, North/East-float mode - Enable gas (C2H4) for optional plumes - Set up for a "deep" scan to the separatrix ASP: - Operate in two bias modes: (South probe is dead) (a) West/East-sweep, North-float mode (b) West-sweep, North/East-float mode - Set up for a "deep" scan to the separatrix FMP: - Operate in two bias modes: (a) Divertor probes in sweep and Vf mode with gated fast sampling (b) Divertor probes in Isat and Vf mode with continuous fast sampling Set fast triggers to capture Ohmic H-mode phase. Starting Discharge: Reload 990825003 or equivalent. This was a dithering 1.0 MA NL04=1.0 discharge with good gaps and probes targeting. Reload segment 3 (which is presently a modified version of segment 3 from shot# 990819001): 1 MA, Ohmic H-mode ending with Bt at 5 tesla. Set gaps to 1.5 cm. Set lower x-point programming similar to 990825003. Shots: (a) Bt scan with constant q. Program to arrive at different Bt during end-of-shot 'flat-top'. Adjust Ip so that qPsi95 is roughly the same during end-of-shot 'flat-top'. 1 redo 990825003 2-3 setup Ohmic H-mode shot, optimized scanning probe targeting 4-6 FSP/ASP/FMP in bias mode (a) then (b) 7 Change end point Bt to 3.5 tesla, Ip = 0.7 MA. 8-10 FSP/ASP/FMP in bias mode (a) then (b) 11 Change end point Bt to 6.0 tesla, Ip = 1.2 MA. 12-14 FSP/ASP/FMP in bias mode (a) then (b) (b) q scan with constant Bt. Set Bt flat-top to 4.0 tesla. Scan Ip from 0.8 to 1.2 MA (may be 1.1 MA if we are afraid of a low q disruption!) 15-16 Ip=0.8MA, setup discharge with optimized scanning probe targeting 17-19 FSP/ASP/FMP in bias mode (a) then (b) 20 change to Ip=1.0 MA 21-23 FSP/ASP/FMP in bias mode (a) then (b) 24 change to Ip=1.2 MA 25-27 FSP/ASP/FMP in bias mode (a) then (b) | |
| Aug 31 1999 09:58:43:107AM | 990831002 | Brian Labombard | Shot #2 - Standard 1MA , 5T ohmic discharge with dithering G-side ionization gauge was dead. Went into cell and connected to spare filament. Gauge looks ok for now. Next shot, setup for Ohmic H-modes. Do shallow probe scan. |
| Aug 31 1999 10:05:03:497AM | 990831003 | Brian Labombard | Shot #3 - didn't get H-mode. Next shot repeat with lower NL04 and optimized FSP Target. Probes in A2 bias mode. |
| Aug 31 1999 10:23:26:547AM | 990831004 | Brian Labombard | Shot #4 - H-mode, goes L at 5 tesla Next Repeat, hoping H-mode continues in 5 tesla portion. Changed FSP target. Probes firing at .85, .65 and 1.05 sec, bias mode A2. |
| Aug 31 1999 10:42:45:263AM | 990831005 | Brian Labombard | Shot #5 - Nice H-mode, persisting at 5 tesla FSP/ASP/FMP in A2 bias mode, deep scan, gated A14 digitizers Target moves away during H-mode! Next shot, repeat Set to only two probe scans with deep insertion during H-mode - cross your fingers! |
| Aug 31 1999 11:14:56:513AM | 990831006 | Brian Labombard | Shot #6 - Nice H-mode, ASP and FSP got in nicely, FSP is a little too deep. FSP/ASP/FMP in A2 bias mode, deep scan, gated A14 digitizers Next shot, repeat with no plume |
| Aug 31 1999 11:15:32:920AM | 990831007 | Brian Labombard | Shot #7 - Nice H-mode, ASP and FSP got in nicely, FSP/ASP/FMP in A2 bias mode, deep scan, gated A14 digitizers Next shot, repeat with probes in B2 bias mode |
| Aug 31 1999 11:39:48:060AM | 990831008 | Brian Labombard | Shot #8 - H-mode during .85 sec scan. ASFSP/ASP/FMP in B2 bias mode, deep scan, continuous A14 digitizers Next shot, go to 3.5 tesla, .75 MA Probes in shallow scan A2 mode. |
| Aug 31 1999 12:33:54:733PM | 990831010 | Brian Labombard | Shot #10 - into H-mode at second probe scan G-side ratiomatic was off ASFSP/ASP/FMP in A2 bias mode, gated A14 digitizers Next shot, repeat with reduced Bt early. |
| Aug 31 1999 12:51:21:123PM | 990831011 | Brian Labombard | Shot #11 - into H-mode at second probe scan ASFSP/ASP/FMP in A2 bias mode, gated A14 digitizers Next shot, repeat with lower gas, better FSP targeting |
| Aug 31 1999 12:56:51:233PM | 990831012 | Brian Labombard | Shot #12 - got H-mode on both probe scans ASFSP/ASP/FMP in A2 bias mode, gated A14 digitizers Next shot, repeat Delay ASP/FSP targeting to .9, 1.1 |
| Aug 31 1999 01:09:53:153PM | 990831013 | Brian Labombard | Shot #13 - got H-mode on both probe scans Data on first scan on ASP looks excellent! ASFSP/ASP/FMP in A2 bias mode, gated A14 digitizers Next shot, repeat with probes in B2 bias mode |
| Aug 31 1999 01:27:01:060PM | 990831014 | Brian Labombard | Shot #14 - H-mode on both probe scans Nice FSP/ASP data FSP/ASP/FMP in B2 bias mode, continuous A14 digitizers Next shot, repeat with probes in A2 bias mode to get Mach data during EDA segment of H-mode |
| Aug 31 1999 01:40:47:263PM | 990831015 | Brian Labombard | Shot #15 - H-mode on both probe scans Nice FSP/ASP data FSP/ASP/FMP in A2 bias mode, gated A14 digitizers Next shot, go to 6 tesla, 1.2 MA at end of shot Probes in shallow scan, A2 bias mode with plumes. |
| Aug 31 1999 02:12:04:263PM | 990831016 | Brian Labombard | Shot #16 - Disrupted early |
| Aug 31 1999 02:12:28:327PM | 990831017 | Brian Labombard | Shot #17 - Disrupted just after first probe scan |
| Aug 31 1999 02:25:17:343PM | 990831018 | Brian Labombard | Shot #18 - No H-mode plumes on FSP |
| Aug 31 1999 02:59:29:590PM | 990831019 | Brian Labombard | Shot #19 - H-mode, drops out of H then disrupts Next shot, reload 990831008 |
| Aug 31 1999 03:06:04:827PM | 990831020 | Brian Labombard | Shot #20 - H-mode on first scan, L-mode on second Next shot, increase Ip and Bt at end of shot |
| Aug 31 1999 03:26:28:717PM | 990831021 | Brian Labombard | Shot #21 - H-mode on first scan, H to L-mode on second Next shot, increase Ip to 1.2 MA and Bt to 6.0 T at end of shot |
| Aug 31 1999 03:47:23:593PM | 990831022 | Brian Labombard | Shot #22 - Probe induced disruption! Did not go into H-mode and as a consequence the FSP was over-inserted by 2mm Next shot, dial up Bt=4 tesla, Ip =0.9 MA Probes in shallow scan. |
| Aug 31 1999 04:05:11:420PM | 990831023 | Brian Labombard | Shot #23 -H-mode at .95 sec Shallow probe injection with plumes Next shot, repeat |
| Aug 31 1999 04:05:39:420PM | 990831024 | Brian Labombard | Shot #24 no plasma Next shot, repeat shot 23 |
| Aug 31 1999 04:31:56:593PM | 990831025 | Brian Labombard | Shot #25 EDA-like H-mode on second scan A2 bias Next shot, repeat with B2 bias (fluctuation mode) |
| Aug 31 1999 04:45:25:967PM | 990831026 | Brian Labombard | Shot #26 disrupted early, no data Next shot, repeat shot 25 with B2 bias (fluctuation mode) |
| Aug 31 1999 05:04:02:263PM | 990831027 | Brian Labombard | Shot# 27 H-mode on two probe scans Probes in B2 bias mode (fluctuation) FSP goes in deep, sees drop in Vf at sep on both scans while ASP only sees drop in Vf on second scan. FSP and ASP also see two dithers (or something) in Vf profile data. Next shot, go to 1.1 MA in A2 bias mode |
| Aug 31 1999 05:46:04:000PM | 990831028 | Brian Labombard | Shot# 28 - Turned out to be a repeat of shot #27 H-mode on both probe scans. |
| Physics Operator Comments | |||
| Aug 31 1999 05:16:13:123PM | Earl Marmar | hybrid coldstart; no errors; all matrices respond | |
| Aug 31 1999 05:16:29:827PM | Earl Marmar | MP#228 SOL Transport using Ohmic H-modes SL: LaBombard PO: Marmar Start (after Tuesday OH test) with standard 1MA 5.1T plasma (like 990825003). Then introduce TF ramps to get ohmic H-mode. Current and field will be scanned shot to shot according to the miniproposal requirements. ICRF will piggyback as possible at the end of flattop, to test and condition J3 and J4. Gas setup - fill B-top with 6 psi of D2 Hybrid enabled fill B-side lower with 1 psi of Ar Hybrid enabled fill B-side upper with 6 psi of H2 Hybrid DISABLED fill C-side with 30 psi of D2 Hybrid enabled leave J-bottom as is Hybrid DISABLED The following gate valves should be enabled, assuming no vacuum problems: ECE, VUV. | |
| Aug 31 1999 05:17:19:717PM | 990831001 | Earl Marmar | OH coax test; PLC control. |
| Aug 31 1999 05:18:56:293PM | 990831002 | Earl Marmar | Load from 990825003, segment 1 from 990824002 move end of Ip flat-top out to 1.5 seconds reduce Argon pulse to 25 msec plasma |
| Aug 31 1999 05:18:35:077PM | 990831003 | Earl Marmar | Turn off segment 2, turn on segment 3, TF scan to try for ohmic H-mode Plasma no H-mode |
| Aug 31 1999 10:14:34:263AM | 990831004 | Earl Marmar | reduce nl_04 to 0.9e20 move zxl down 4 mm at 1.2 seconds reduce argon puff to 10 msec add .5mT to B_R offset (now 0.000) plasma ohmic H-mode 1.5 MW RF late in shot |
| Aug 31 1999 10:47:15:857AM | 990831005 | Earl Marmar | ZXL tweak (ramp down 4 mm between 0.8 and 1.2 s) plasma long ohmic H-mode (EDA-ish?) 1 MW RF |
| Aug 31 1999 11:04:49:577AM | 990831006 | Earl Marmar | repeat plasma H-modes No spectroscopy data |
| Aug 31 1999 11:29:55:780AM | 990831007 | Earl Marmar | repeat plasma H-modes Spectroscopy data ok |
| Aug 31 1999 11:47:53:013AM | 990831008 | Earl Marmar | repeat plasma H-modes |
| Aug 31 1999 11:55:01:107AM | 990831009 | Earl Marmar | 3.5 Tesla program for 0.75 MA no RF removed RCUR jog plasma got 0.71 MA Goes into H-mode at about 1.08 s |
| Aug 31 1999 12:15:29:937PM | 990831010 | Earl Marmar | Program for 0.8 MA plasma H-mode after 1.04 s |
| Aug 31 1999 12:32:11:810PM | 990831011 | Earl Marmar | Reduce I_TF to -82000 before 0.8 s, to get into H-mode sooner Start TF rampdown later (1.6 s) plasma H-Mode at 0.89 s |
| Aug 31 1999 05:20:16:030PM | 990831012 | Earl Marmar | lower nl_04 to 0.7e20 plasma H-Mode after 0.83 s |
| Aug 31 1999 01:04:00:297PM | 990831013 | Earl Marmar | Tweak ZXU so it doesn't ramp down after 1.2 s plasma |
| Aug 31 1999 01:19:58:857PM | 990831014 | Earl Marmar | Bring TF back up after 1.2, to try to avoid the rampdown disruption Plasma The TF tweak helped the disruption |
| Aug 31 1999 01:41:34:623PM | 990831015 | Earl Marmar | Repeat plasma |
| Aug 31 1999 01:51:57:950PM | 990831016 | Earl Marmar | 1.2 MA, 6 Tesla plasma Disrupt at 0.47 seconds (around q_95=3) |
| Aug 31 1999 02:11:29:140PM | 990831017 | Earl Marmar | Raise I_p more slowly Small CLEARIN tweak (increase 2 mm) slow early TF rampdown plasma Disrupt at 0.92 s; got very resistive heading towards the disruption |
| Aug 31 1999 02:20:29:670PM | 990831018 | Earl Marmar | lower I_P to 1.1 MA raise nl_04 to 1e20 reduce time at lowest TF plasma no ohmic H-mode brief RF H-mode late |
| Aug 31 1999 02:38:17:937PM | 990831019 | Earl Marmar | Raise I_p to 1.15 MA lower nl_04 to 0.9e20 keep lowest TF value longer plasma disrupt at 1.09 s |
| Aug 31 1999 03:10:14:077PM | 990831020 | Earl Marmar | reload 990831008 plasma |
| Aug 31 1999 03:22:39:687PM | 990831021 | Earl Marmar | 1.2 MA 6 Tesla plasma TF PLC limit was 160 kA, so got 5.7 T |
| Aug 31 1999 03:35:44:997PM | 990831022 | Earl Marmar | Raise TF PLC limit to 175 kA Raise I_p demand to 1.25 MA Disrupt at 0.87 s |
| Aug 31 1999 03:55:47:797PM | 990831023 | Earl Marmar | 4 tesla across plasma H-mode after 0.94 |
| Aug 31 1999 04:14:17:233PM | 990831024 | Earl Marmar | repeat dud; OH2L breaker pulled before the shot |
| Aug 31 1999 04:30:33:903PM | 990831025 | Earl Marmar | No PCS changes plasma Ohmic H-mode after 1.015 (EDA) |
| Aug 31 1999 04:55:59:030PM | 990831026 | Earl Marmar | Repeat early disrupt; something fell in |
| Aug 31 1999 04:56:23:530PM | 990831027 | Earl Marmar | No PCS changes Plasma Ohmic H-Mode (EDA) |
| Aug 31 1999 05:07:37:717PM | 990831028 | Earl Marmar | repeat plasma Ohmic H-Mode |
| Engineering Operator Comments | ||||
| Shot | Time | Type | Status | Comment |
| 1 | 09:14:53:187AM | Test | Ok | OH co-ax test ok |
| 2 | 09:24:52:140AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults/plasma |
| 3 | 09:52:58:263AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults/plasma |
| 4 | 10:08:35:340AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults/plasma |
| 5 | 10:24:05:187AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults/plasma |
| 6 | 10:49:46:873AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults/plasma |
| 7 | 11:04:15:077AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults/plasma |
| 8 | 11:29:37:983AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults/plasma |
| 9 | 11:46:05:530AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults/plasma |
| 10 | 11:58:49:873AM | Plasma | Ok | no faults/plasma |
| 11 | 12:25:51:403PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults/plasma |
| 12 | 12:38:41:763PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults/plasma |
| 13 | 12:54:26:437PM | Plasma | Ok | no faults/plasma |
| 14 | 01:14:08:123PM | Plasma | Ok | (null) |
| 15 | 01:27:22:937PM | Plasma | Ok | (null) |
| 16 | 01:44:30:200PM | Plasma | Ok | (null) |
| 17 | 01:58:25:640PM | Plasma | Ok | (null) |
| 18 | 02:11:59:450PM | Plasma | Ok | (null) |
| 19 | 02:31:54:357PM | Plasma | Ok | (null) |
| 20 | 02:56:52:373PM | Plasma | Ok | (null) |
| 21 | 03:13:11:170PM | Plasma | Ok | (null) |
| 22 | 03:33:34:950PM | Plasma | Ok | (null) |
| 23 | 03:47:34:623PM | Plasma | Ok | (null) |
| 24 | 04:01:56:187PM | Plasma | Bad | PF Power supply Faults |
| 25 | 04:22:43:390PM | Plasma | Ok | (null) |
| 26 | 04:36:12:983PM | Plasma | Ok | (null) |
| 27 | 04:49:25:500PM | Plasma | Ok | (null) |
| 28 | 05:03:35:937PM | Plasma | Ok | (null) |