Here is a list of internal
MSE memos
|
No |
Topic |
Date |
Comment |
|
|
Mar 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
Sept, 2009 |
This needs to be
examined during the next in-vessel calibration (not for oral exam). Question:
can we reduce errors in measuring pitch angle simply by rotating the
PEM + linear polarizer assembly? |
|
|
107 |
July, 2009 |
|
|
|
106 |
June, 2009 |
|
|
|
105 |
March 2009 |
|
|
|
104 |
Jan 2009 |
|
|
|
103 |
Reducing
azimuthal temperature variation in the MSE canister |
Dec 2008 |
|
|
102 |
Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
101 |
Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
100 |
Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
99 |
Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
98 |
Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
97 |
Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
96 |
Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
95 |
October 2008 |
|
|
|
94 |
Sept 2008 |
|
|
|
93 |
Sept 2008 |
|
|
|
92 |
October 2008 |
|
|
|
91 |
Effect
of thermal conductivity of lens ring on temperature … |
Sept 2008 |
|
|
90 |
(superceded
by 91) |
Sept 2008 |
|
|
89 |
August 2008 |
|
|
|
88 |
August 2008 |
|
|
|
87 |
August 2008 |
|
|
|
86 |
June 2008 |
Can one estimate the
absolute photon rate incident on a detector by looking at the variability in
the measured count rate? |
|
|
85 |
A
simple estimate of the effects of background signal on pitch angles measured
by MSE |
June 2008 |
Why we need to be
able to compensate the polarized background signal so accurately. |
|
84 |
June 2008 |
How to compute the
polarization fraction. |
|
|
83 |
May 2008 |
A follow-on to previous
memo |
|
|
82 |
May 2008 |
Evaluates potential errors
for an in-situ calibration system. |
|
|
81 |
April 2008 |
Analysis showing
that the fixed phase shift due to mirrors could magnify the effect of
variable phase shift due to thermal birefringence. |
|
|
80 |
March 2008 |
A very detailed discussion
of the coordinates for optical analysis of MSE. |
|
|
79 |
March 2008 |
|
|
|
78 |
Mar 2008 |
More on the possibility of
replacing lenses with curved mirrors.
This analysis shows what shape elliptical mirror can be used to
replace a given lens. |
|
|
77 |
Feb 2008 |
Analysis for Manfred Bitter’s discovery that while one spherical mirror has
terrible aberrations, two such mirrors in the appropriate orientation can
have excellent focusing. |
|
|
76 |
Feb 2008 |
You will remember that one
proposed solution to the thermal birefringence problem was to use spherical
mirrors. |
|
|
75 |
Jan 2008 |
More stuff on multiple MSE
harmonics. |
|
|
74 |
Dec 2007 |
Simple discussion
of effect of waveplate on linearly polarized
light. Can be used to develop a
simple-to-explain model of how MSE works. |
|
|
73 |
Oct 2007 |
What happens if
we use the ‘numerical lock-in’ approach and if the PEM frequency drifts a
little during a shot. Shows that small drifts in the PEM
frequency can be a problem, and for this reason we changed the software to
analyze the frequency over a number of piece-wise intervals of 200 ms in the
standard mse analysis. |
|
|
72 |
withdrawn |
|
|
|
71 |
Sept 2007 |
Title is wrong. This memo discusses expected heating of the
MSE optics canister. |
|
|
70 |
August 2007 |
How to infer the retardance by looking at the ratio of particular
frequencies in the MSE spectrum. Howard has a simple discussion of this in his thesis. |
|
|
69 |
July 2007 |
Have a look at
equations 7-8. Previously, students
have been asked questions about how to infer q(r=0) from MSE data. See analysis leading up to Eq. 7-8. |
|
|
68 |
July 2007 |
|
|
|
67 |
<obsolete> |
|
|
|
66 |
May 2007 |
|
|
|
65 |
April, 2007 |
This generalizes the
analysis of secondary beam emission to allow the beam to be non-normal. |
|
|
64 |
March, 2007 |
|
|
|
63 |
Feb 2007 |
|
|
|
62 |
<obsolete> |
Feb 2007 |
|
|
61 |
Aug 2006 |
|
|
|
60 |
<obsolete> |
|
|
|
59 |
<obsolete> |
|
|
|
58 |
May 2006 |
|
|
|
57 |
May 2006 |
|
|
|
56 |
<obsolete> |
Dec 2005 |
|
|
55 |
April 2006 |
A big analysis of the
secondary-emission conjecture. |
|
|
54 |
April 2006 |
|
|
|
53 |
Feb 2006 |
|
|
|
52 |
Dec 2005 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
What happens to
the polarization direction for light that bounces off a mirror? Initially, we thought that the observed
heating effect might be caused by the MSE canister deforming, thereby tilting
the mirrors. Some mirrors have more
effect than others. |
|
|
50 |
Effect
of spherical aberration on collimating lens in PMT assembly |
Dec 2005 |
For a while, I worried that
spherical aberrations in the collimating lens in the APD filter assembly
changed the filter passband. |
|
|
Oct 2005 |
J. Ko: lots of data for WGP versus angle |
|
|
|
Oct 2005 |
|
|
|
|
August 2005 |
Miniproposal to look for fluorine and molecular emission as
background. |
|
|
|
August 2005 |
|
|
|
|
August 2005 |
|
|
|
- |
August 2005 |
|
|
|
- |
August 2005 |
|
|
|
- |
July 2005 |
|
|
|
49c |
July 2005 |
J. Ko – a better analysis
of the angle-of-incidence effect. |
|
|
49 |
June 2005 |
J. Ko – a better analysis
of the angle-of-incidence effect. |
|
|
48 |
May 2005 |
During an in-vessel
calibration using the linear polarizer that we could rotate in front of the
L1 lens, we noticed that the measured angle depends on the angle of
incidence. This memo analyzes the
expected behavior. Jinseok has an APS
paper on this that goes into detail. |
|
|
47 |
April 2005 |
More on proper treatment of
imperfect mirrors. |
|
|
46 |
March 2005 |
|
|
|
45 |
Feb 2005 |
|
|
|
42 |
Nov 2004 |
More on the
secondary-emission explanation of beam-into-gas. |
|
|
41 |
Sept 2004 |
More on the
secondary-emission explanation of beam-into-gas. |
|
|
40 |
Sept 2004 |
More on the
secondary-emission explanation of beam-into-gas. |
|
|
39 |
October 2004 |
More on the
secondary-emission explanation of beam-into-gas. |
|
|
38 |
August 2004 |
We tried to measure the Verdet constant of our lenses in-situ by putting a small
amount of current in various EF coils |
|
|
37 |
August 2004 |
Not important. |
|
|
36 |
July 2004 |
Part of our analysis to
measure the Verdet constant of our SFL6 lenses. |
|
|
35 |
July 2004 |
More on analysis of phase
shift between PEM drive and the MSE signals at 40 and 44 kHz frequency |
|
|
34 |
July 2004 |
First of series of analyses
of the secondary-neutral explanation of beam into gas anomaly. |
|
|
33 |
July 2004 |
Hmmm, I’m not sure this is
correct. |
|
|
32 |
The
relation between real and MSE invessel optics pitch
angles |
July 2004 |
J. Ko |
|
31 |
To
determine the L1 position in (x,y,z) in the MSE
coordinate system |
July 2004 |
J. Ko |
|
30 |
June 2004 |
First in-vessel
calibration, showing cos(2 theta) and cos (4 theta)
error terms. |
|
|
29 |
May 2004 |
An early attempt to
understand the beam-into-gas anomalies. |
|
|
28 |
May 2004 |
|
|
|
27 |
May 2004 |
First absolute calibration
of linear polarizer. |
|
|
26 |
April 2004 |
More analysis to absolutely
calibrate the linear polarizer on the rotational stage. |
|
|
25 |
March 2004 |
This was a fire drill. For a while, I thought that the filter
assemblies yielded a different passband than
advertized due to the finite entrance slit.
This analysis may be useful when we consider the beam-splitter
approach to background subtraction. |
|
|
24 |
March 2004 |
Filter temperature scan
during beam into gas with no TF. Gives
information on the filter performance. |
|
|
23 |
March 2004 |
How to relate the
pitch angle in tokamak coordinates to pitch angle
in MSE frame of reference. This is
also treated (probably in a more understandable way) in Howard’s thesis and Jinseok’s thesis.
You should understand this mapping at least at a high level. |
|
|
22 |
Feb 2004 |
Effect of Zeeman splitting
on MSE analysis. Effect is small. |
|
|
21 |
Feb 2004 |
More analysis of imperfect
mirrors, including effect of filter temperature scan. |
|
|
20 |
Feb 2004 |
Another in the series that
computes the effect of imperfect mirrors on the MSE measured antle |
|
|
19 |
Jan 2004 |
First attempt to absolutely
calibrate the direction of the transmission axis of the linear polarizer that
is mounted on the rotational stage. Accuracy
a few hundredth’s of a degree. |
|
|
18 |
Jan 2004 |
Has some interesting stuff
on effect of non-normal incidence at PEMs. |
|
|
17 |
Feb 2004 |
Finally, this memo
correctly assumes that sigma and pi light are perpendicular in the MSE frame. The calculation of polarization fraction is
still wrong. Some interesting stuff on
filter temperature scans at the end. |
|
|
16 |
Nov 2003 |
unimportant |
|
|
15 |
Sept 2003 |
wrong |
|
|
14 |
August 2003 |
Some beam neutrals will
charge-exchange onto thermal deuterons.
The newly-generated thermal neutrals can have 3 à 2 transitions, i.e. Halpha
light. The velocity distribution of
the thermal neutrals is Maxwellian, with a
temperature of maybe 0.1-0.5 keV and so it will be
Doppler shifted. Will any of this
light get past the MSE filters and thereby pollute the measurement? This memo argues NO. |
|
|
13 |
August 2003 |
? |
|
|
12 |
Feb 2006 |
First few pages
are useful to review for Doppler shift, stark shift, etc. You should
understand e.g. figure 3. |
|
|
11 |
August 2003 |
This is wrong. the sigma and pi
radiation are exactly perpendicular in the MSE frame. |
|
|
10 |
July 2003 |
As you remember, during
in-vessel calibration we determine the phase shift between the PEM drive and
the MSE signal that maximizes the intensity at various frequencies (40, 44,
etc). This memo has the result for the
2003 calibration. |
|
|
9 |
July 2003 |
Withdrawn. |
|
|
8 |
July 2003 |
Describes the
computed intensities at lots of MSE harmonics. See figure 3 for a plot of the expected
intensity for ideal mirrors at 40, 44, 42, 46, 38, etc kHz. |
|
|
7 |
June 2003 |
Followup on memo 5.
Not important. But at the end, it does use Mueller calculus to compute
the expected behavior of MSE if only one of the two PEMs
is turned on. This is the
Mueller-approach to the problem we did on the board the other day. I think it gets the same answer. |
|
|
6 |
June 2003 |
obsolete |
|
|
5 |
June 2003 |
We observe that only one of
the first-harmonic amplitudes (20 or 22) has a significant
amplitude, the other does not. Hawkes concluded that the 20/22 amplitude has info about
circular polarization. This memo
analyzes the expected behavior. Not
important for oral. |
|
|
4 |
June 2003 |
3 pg. simply shows that proper way to compensate for the
polarized background is to subtract the A40 and A44 amplitudes during
beam-off periods from the A40 and A44 amplitudes during beam-on. |
|
|
3 |
June 2003 |
Not interesting until after
oral exam |
|
|
2 |
June 2003 |
3 pg. A simple
application of Mueller calculus to understanding what happens if the
polarizer is not inserted at the same angle in its frame each time. |
|
|
1 |
June 2003 |
Not sure this is right |