Feeling social? Share this
A: Typically, energy moves from large scales to small before dissipating. But at tiny scales, magnetic field lines in plasmas break and reconnect using only electrons. Reconnection events can snowball, combining small magnetic structures into larger ones, helping explain how energy moves and changes form in the sun and fusion experiments.
A: For me, the most exciting outcome is the development of the first theoretical framework explaining “electron-only” magnetic reconnection in plasmas, which is when electrons, not the usual ions, participate in breaking apart and rejoining magnetic field lines through a reconnection process that releases energy. Magnetic reconnection is typically associated with energetic plasma events like solar flares, and we use a framework called magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) to describe how the plasma and magnetic field lines behave. MHD works well with dense plasmas because it treats it like a uniform liquid, averaging out the behavior of individual particles, which is an effective method in many circumstances. But we also see magnetic reconnection in environments where charged-particle collisions are less likely to happen. In these so-called collisionless plasma environments, electrons (and electrons only) are responsible for magnetic reconnection. Here, the behavior can’t be characterized accurately using MHD because it happens on a smaller, more detailed scale than MHD was meant for. That’s where this new theoretical framework comes in, and when we used it, we found that electron-only reconnection has very different properties than large-scale reconnection explained by MHD.
A: If I had unlimited time and funding, the next major question I would pursue is: How do these newly understood electron-only magnetic reconnection events influence large-scale astrophysical phenomena, such as solar flares, pulsar magnetospheres, and accretion disks around black holes? I would explore how tiny, electron-scale reconnection events cascade upward, merging into larger magnetic structures that drive these massive cosmic processes. This could not only reveal the origins of large-scale magnetic formations but also shed light on how energetic particles are generated across different scales in these extreme environments.
A: I would choose “Life on Mars?” by David Bowie.
First, the title alone feels like a very good metaphor because I’m literally exploring the universe, in a way. It’s all about the unknown and the unreachable.
Second, I feel it’s more than just the name. My understanding of the song is that it’s telling the story of someone searching for meaning, just like this girl who goes to the movies and ends up feeling disconnected from real world. There’s this strange mix of wonder and disillusion, and honestly, relate to that when I think about my research. My research is not application-driven, and I can’t always explain how it’ll help people in their daily lives. Sometimes I ask myself, do we really need this?
But then it comes to me that how beautiful it is to just explore for the sake of curiosity and to lose myself in the science. It is a kind of escape from the world as well, but it also feels necessary. People have always asked “unnecessary” questions like “is there life on Mars?”, and I think we need that kind of questioning. Even if the answers don’t come right away, the act of asking is worth something.
A: Every time I ski in Colorado, there are always powder days.